"tank engines like Thomas, don't need tenders. They can go just as well backwards as forwards. But to hear Gordon talk, you would've thought that the fat controller had given him a tender, just to show how important he was."
@Moggster232 жыл бұрын
The longest serving steam locomotives in Britain were the A1\A1X Terrier tank engines with some achieving 90+ years service until retirement. A really useful engine as someone we know might say. 😀
@OneMarsyBoi2 жыл бұрын
The most famous being Stepney of Thomas the tank engine. And the bluebell railway
@ianbailey46672 жыл бұрын
And in September, Fenchurch will celebrate her 150th birthday
@peeky442 жыл бұрын
Not to mention Newport on the Isle of Wight which won the 1878 Paris Exhibition Gold medal. (edit: somehow managed to get the wrong date and loco name first time)
@johnfry10112 жыл бұрын
@@ianbailey4667 having, at one time, lived in a road named after Fenchurch I have a soft spot for her (it’s definitely the engine as there was a Stepney Close nearby too)
@ianbailey46672 жыл бұрын
@@johnfry1011 great that there are roads named after them, have been lucky enough to have been on a train hauled by Freshwater
@FriedEgg1012 жыл бұрын
Thomas was so happy when he got his own branch line.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
He cried tears of joy on arrival on it in my Thomasverse.
@Jimmy_Jones Жыл бұрын
@erical6338 Are you sure he didn't just find shed 17?
@jovanweismiller71142 жыл бұрын
I grew up in the States in a division point on the Union Pacific Railroad. My family was definitely a 'railroading family' with all the male members, including myself, working on the railroad in some capacity for three generations. I only mention that to point out that I don't think I ever saw a tank engine, even in the shunting yard, which we called a switching yard. And it wasn't like I had no opportunity to notice. I lived on one side and my Gran lived on the other just across the street from the yard. Thus, walking across the yard was an almost daily occurrence.
@raymondflanagan93552 жыл бұрын
The major advantage of a tank engine is that you can have a Vindaloo without having a tender behind.
@peterjansen79292 жыл бұрын
LOL - probably the best joke I ever read in a KZbin comment. Thanks!
@millennialchicken2 жыл бұрын
Well I do believe that Thomas, is indeed a tank engine.
@tomwillis3092 жыл бұрын
And a very useful one at that
@joshuaW56212 жыл бұрын
And the most famous tank engine
@Enterprising112 жыл бұрын
True
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
He's my favorite tank engine. Even if he's just a toy. I grew up with the models, so I choose to remember them as "toy trains", as my mom said when I was little.
@flowerfrombfdi Жыл бұрын
And I believe Stepney is one too.
@Jonago.2 жыл бұрын
before this video, I thought a tank engine was the same as a steam locomotive. Thank you for educating me on the topic!
@clairebennett91042 жыл бұрын
*He Has Six Small Wheels* *A Short Stumpy Funnel* *A Short Stumpy Boiler* *And A Short Stumpy Dome*
@rayfisher39212 жыл бұрын
This has always irritated me because the illustrations make plain he DIDN'T have a short stumpy funnel or dome. On the contrary.
@Inverse_to_Chaos25 күн бұрын
7:24 Your closing statement was spot-on yet so natural. I haven’t watched the show in years, so I’m trying to recall as much as possible.
@florjanbrudar6922 жыл бұрын
8:10 My most favourite of the three BR Standard Class tanks, the Class 4. It's big and very fast.
@bow-tiedengineer44532 жыл бұрын
I'd never heard of an inverted saddle tank. Learn something new every day!
@johndavies10902 жыл бұрын
I don't think they were any too common - usually the tank was underneath the boiler, but not low between the frames, which made it a well tank.
@bow-tiedengineer44532 жыл бұрын
@@johndavies1090 yeah, I only found a couple examples when I looked it up, but it's an interesting design. I wonder if anyone was crazy enough to have both an inverted saddle tank in the front and a normal saddle tank behind the chimney, possibly connected together into one ridiculous tank.
@pinngg69072 жыл бұрын
My favorite type of locomotive. They look like it's fully packed and ready for the journey they're gonna fulfill
@-xirx-2 жыл бұрын
The model railway nerd in me was absolutely loving this video! 😃
@JagoHazzard2 жыл бұрын
There’s more steam train stuff to come, including a locomotive that likely owes its fame to model railways.
@ollyshighlightreel65302 жыл бұрын
I was a huge Thomas the Tank Engine fan as a kid (and I did visit Bury and the station at Bolton Road to see a 'full size' Thomas. But I didn't know what a tank engine was in 1990 though, I thought it was just a steam train... That was until this video that is, thanks for the clarity Jago. Now only if ELR can keep the line a heritage railway and not have Northern Rail turn it back into a branch line.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
Without Thomas, I'd associate "tank engine" with Army tanks. Rosie and Porter are from my country, btw.
@roderickjoyce67162 жыл бұрын
London Transport had some second-hand GWR 57xx pannier tanks that were used to haul engineering trains when the electricity on the sub-surface lines was turned off at night. There was a daytime train that ran to the spoil heap at Croxley. It would run to Watford to take water from an attractive tower which looked as if it had been there since the station was built in the 1920s. Once watered the engine would run round the train and return southwards as access to the siding at Croxley was from the up (towards London) line only. This was the last non-heritage main line steam in the UK; it ended with a spectacular run from the City to Neasden depot via Baker Street in June 1971. Some of the LT panniers were rescued and have run in their LT livery in preservation. One features in the 1970s film of E. Nesbit's "The Railway Children".
@andrewpinner31812 жыл бұрын
Tank you Jago ! l'm sure l'm not the first to say this...doh! l had the books way back when, early 70's, featuring Thomas, Gordon, The Fat Controller, Percy ... Loved 'em !
@jimfrodsham79382 жыл бұрын
I'm not in anyway a "Railway" enthusiast but somehow I'm always drawn to and fascinated by Jago's posts. So interesting.
Tank engines are severely underrated. I do love a massive T1 or Big Boy but the tiny little shunters and narrow gauge locomotives have my heart.
@bobcosmic2 жыл бұрын
Jago Hazzard staying on track as always !
@ashleyjlikestrains2 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahahhahahahahahaha funny pun
@Keithbarber2 жыл бұрын
@@ashleyjlikestrains a bit boring May send me to sleeper on the trackbed 😀 I have added my own set of one liners
@ashleyjlikestrains2 жыл бұрын
@@Keithbarber ok
@ashleyjlikestrains2 жыл бұрын
@Rich H ik
@Keithbarber2 жыл бұрын
@Rich H you must be really pleased with that one, well chuff chuffed
@dangerousandy2 жыл бұрын
6:58 I’m guessing that Dougal used to work at Provan Gas Works in Glasgow. I moved to Glasgow back in 2020, and I have noticed all the disused railway relics that were once part of the branch line to to works.
@physiocrat71432 жыл бұрын
During the Kuwait war in 1991 there were reports of tank engines being unloaded and stored at the quayside at the supply port. It conjured up an image of rows of Jinties and 5700 class locos in sidings by the water's edge. Lovely picture.
@ukaszwalczak1154Күн бұрын
Some traumatized LYR Pug, like the shellshocked meme 💀
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
Apart from being nicely explained as usual, this illustrates a pretty wide range of historic British tank engines of numerous classes in various locations - the NRM at York naturally features strongly, and several preserved railways and steam centres. Several noteworthy classes shown - the LBSC Terriers, L&Y 2-4-2s, LMS Stanier tanks, and GWR panniers for example.
@pauldonatantonio77852 жыл бұрын
I arrogantly expected this to be an amusing presentation of what I already knew. Well, it was...until the last couple of minutes. "Well" tanks, "box" tanks, "wing" tanks, "inverted saddle" tanks and "back" tanks. Wow, never heard of them before! I look foward to telling my wife that I'm not such a nerd.
@MrDavil432 жыл бұрын
Seems like perfect bedtime conversation to me!
@aklc40902 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@wbeliteofficial_012 жыл бұрын
Pls do more of these kind of videos on the really nerdy stuff. I like it
@keithorchard31372 жыл бұрын
I worked on a lot of them in the 1960s at Bournemouth, thanks for bringing back some great memories, Jago. The Riddle's locos were like a Rolls Royce for seating and shoveling comfort, and the GWR saddle tanks were like a slave Galley for shoveling ! LOL !
@daveherbert62152 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@WolfmanWoody2 жыл бұрын
Thomas the Tank Engine, published the year I was born and I had early copies read to me at bedtime. Because of them I always wanted to be an engine driver, but my eyes weren't big enough to fit in the windows.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
He came to my country the year I was born, via Shining Time Station. So, Shining Time Station's the reason I know what a tank engine, because Thomas taught me.
@ThomasTrue2 жыл бұрын
Furthest north GWR-design pannier tanks have reached? Helmsdale, way up the far north of Scotland. In 1958, the Dornoch branch was needing new engines to replace their ancient and clapped-out Highland Railway 0-6-0s. 16xx Class 0-6-0PT 1649, designed for the Welsh valleys, was transferred from Swindon to Inverness Lochgorm shed, and was sent to work on the Dornoch branch. It was so successful that it was soon joined by sister engine 1646. Inverness Lochgorm was also home to a Jinty at one point.
@rayfisher39212 жыл бұрын
Actually they were based at Helmsdale shed.
@thestargateking2 жыл бұрын
i love the opening where you say "explain railway terminology for the benefit of people who arent nerds like me". Then you have me, who is a massive railway nerd who didnt learn anything new but the videos are still entertaining to watch so i do anyway. (sometimes i do learn things, but thats usually related to UK specific stuff that doesnt apply to where i live on the other side of the planet)
@MrDportjoe2 жыл бұрын
If you deal with an American rail fan remember you shunt, we switch. so switch engine and switch yard. Oh and we also have been to HUMP cars in a switch yard (meaning the switcher rolls the cars to the top of a small hill then allowed to free roll through the switches (points) to the line of cars that will make up the next "haul" (Train).
@caw25sha2 жыл бұрын
There were hump shunting yards in Britain as well, and I believe many other countries.
@dunebasher19712 жыл бұрын
Hump-shunting happens/happened in the UK too. You'll still see wagons with signs on them saying "Not to be hump or loose shunted"
@Tevildo2 жыл бұрын
Strictly speaking, a line of wagons (cars) that make up a train is a "rake". The train is the whole thing with the loco (er - loco?) and brake van (caboose) attached. :)
@ktipuss2 жыл бұрын
Appearances can be deceptive. I always considered the Sydney (NSW) suburban 30 Class tanks to be small, until one day one was coupled to the front of The Flying Scotsman 4472 on its 1988 visit to Australia. The Sydney tank was bigger than the Flying Scotsman! A lot of the 30 Class were converted to tender engines when Sydney electrification made them redundant; they were given the name "30T Class" which caused some confusion. The last 30 Class Tank was withdrawn in February 1973.
@highpath47762 жыл бұрын
Worst thing I here on Thomas etc railway days is the General Public calling it Thomas The Tank. ( though in fairness the military self propelled killing machines were called Tanks as a means of disguising their purpose )
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
Thomas the Train's another. He's not a train, he's a train engine, a tank engine to be exact. Say "tank engine" and I see his adorable face. Someone said "Thomas has a very cute face."
@russellgxy29052 жыл бұрын
I find it interesting that the Southern Railway had tank engines that closely and furtherly fit its short distance passenger runs. Two tank engines, the K class from the South Eastern & Chatham Railway and the L class frrom the London Brighton & South Coast were each designed for express trains. Meanwhile, the London & South Western Railway had _two_ tank engines for heavy shunting and trip freights, the H16 and G16, both of which ended up being the widest steam engines in the country. And then when the Southern Railway happened, the W and Z class tank engines appeared for the same duties
@bingbong73162 жыл бұрын
The K, or "River" class had stability issues over poor track, resulting in the Sevenoaks disaster in 1927 and their rebuilding into U class tender engines. Strangely, the L class suffered the same stability issues until they were modified to halve the capacity of the side tanks and have a well tank fitted between the frames; clearly, news didn't travel fast, because it would have solved the K problems. The L class were also rebuilt, into the mediocre N15X class of tender engines, following electrification of the Brighton line. Also, the I3 Atlantic tanks were early examples of superheated engines, running from Brighton to Rugby and back without a water stop - this impressed the LNWR so much, they took up superheating.
@bingbong73162 жыл бұрын
@Richard Harrold ohh, the W was lovely. The Met tanks built from Maunsell parts were called the K class... intentionally?
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
@Richard Harrold Probably the Southern simply didn't need any more W's. They were just used for short trip freights round London (as on the Met). It would seem that they were not felt sprightly enough for passenger train use by the Met, LNER or SR. BR went for LMS-type 2-6-4 tanks instead on routes like Oxted/Uckfield.
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
The LBSCR used tank engines a lot for quite fast passenger services. There were the E5 0-6-2 "radial tanks", the four I classes of 4-4-2s of which only the I3's were any good (and as Bing Bong points out, were notable and well-publicised early examples of superheating), and two J class 4-6-2s as well as the L class 4-6-4s. The I3s worked heavy commuter expresses over the tough Oxted/Uckfield line for many years (long climbs at 1 in 100) and eventually handed over to LMS/BR 2-6-4 tanks similar to those that performed so well on the Tilbury line. It was said though that if the similar H1/H2 class Atlantic tender engines were rostered instead, they gained a few minutes from not having to fill up with water at the Oxted stop.
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
@Richard Harrold OK, checking my source (Richard Hardy) it was the LMS/BR 2-6-4s that had to take a bit of extra water at Oxted. They had harder work to do than the I3s - the "Terrible 6.10" Victoria-Uckfield was 10 modern coaches and had to try to keep pace with the electrics to East Croydon, then climb to Woldingham summit. Also depends where they had to get to from Uckfield before they could replenish water.
@AlwaysmadPercy7 ай бұрын
I don’t know why but when I was really young I thought the 5700 class tank engines looked like ducks…..I then learned of Thomas.
@creativejamieplays71852 жыл бұрын
Clicked on this just to see how long it would take for Thomas to be mentioned.
@JagoHazzard2 жыл бұрын
Some things are just inevitable.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
@@JagoHazzard The phrase is Thomas, to me. Say "tank engine" and a little blue engine fills my mind's eye.
@thesteelrodent17962 жыл бұрын
4:51 and 4:58: those two locomotives were some of the first loco models made by Matchbox. I'm not really a train nerd, but when i was very little someone in the family gave me a Matchbox train set and some extra trains, which included those two models. It always bothered me they didn't look anything like the trains we have/had in Denmark
@stepheneyles21982 жыл бұрын
From one massive nerd to another! Thoroughly enjoyed this foray into tank engines! As one who grew up with the Railway books it was nice to see them referred to here... PS have you ever met the Fat Controller? 😁
@atgordon19482 жыл бұрын
as always, a great video delivered in the self deprecating "hazzard" style (and more enjoyable for it too!). I have a small quibble: you mention that shunting involves moving stock and isn't a money maker ... a very small part of shunting was (and is) stock movement. The vast majority of shunting involves organizing freight traffic at large marshalling yards so the right cargo goes to the right destination, and was a very significant revenue earner for the pre-BR big 4 that continues to this day. The LNER made more money on freight, and less on passenger traffic (while the Southern was the obverse ... maybe worth a video?)
@Kim-px2sq2 жыл бұрын
Not watched it yet, but really hoping Jago is in my beloved home town of Ramsbottom. That definitely looks like a platform I have spent many hours on...
@caileanshields45452 жыл бұрын
I live for nerdy stuff like this, tanks very much, Jago. Especially if it concerns the railways. ;) 4:24 This engine (Lancashire and Yorkshire Class 21 'Pug' No.19, built in 1910) is a fairly recent return-ee to steam, as her gleaming condition indicates. Another example of this class (L&Y No. 68, LMS No. 11218 & BR No. 51218; built 1901 and withdrawn September 1964) survives as a static exhibit at Oxenhope on the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway, though there are considerations about returning this example to working order too.
@BrokenIET2 жыл бұрын
I pronounce it yago, also nice slide into the ad lol
@Andrewjg_892 жыл бұрын
I do like your KZbin channel called “Jago Hazzard”. I’ve always been so fascinated in your videos since I started watching your videos and subscribed to your videos. Keep up the good work Jago.
@ReubenAshwell2 жыл бұрын
Always known what tank engines were thanks to Thomas. Also interesting to learn of the different types that exist.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
Me, too. Thomas taught me practically everything I know about tank engines.
@ListerDavid2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video, I live on the Tilbury Southend branch line so that gave me a little moment of pride.
@germanogirardelli2 жыл бұрын
blimey that ad transition was smooth as heck
@lawrencelewis25922 жыл бұрын
I wonder about the term "Jinty" It seems to me to be a nautical reference but I haven't been able to find a defintion.
@jonathangat47652 жыл бұрын
Nice pictures of the different heritage trains.
@MrGreatplum2 жыл бұрын
Wait, Jago isn’t your real name? 😜 Another excellent video - you are definitely travelling around the heritage lines these days!
@FelloniusWizard2 жыл бұрын
Finally got the answers I needed for so long. Now I have to check what they were called in Sweden.
@caw25sha2 жыл бұрын
Is there a reason why larger locomotives, Pacifics for example, didn't have some kind of integral tank to allow for either more coal in the tender and/or smaller tenders?
@pf329002 жыл бұрын
Probably because of the diameter of the boiler. Certainly on express locos, the boiler is BIG.
@johndavies10902 жыл бұрын
@@pf32900 Capacity is one reason, safety another. The big express tank types had to have their tanks high on the footplate, which could lead to problems with stability if the water started sloshing in a part empty tank. Indeed the SECR/SR K or 'River' class had to be rebuilt as mogul tender engines after the Sevenoaks disaster for that reason - they were known as the 'Rolling Rivers'. Above a certain boiler diameter tanks became impractical anyway - an A3, Princess or Royal Scot boiler was close to the loading gauge limits. And the amount of machinery in between the frames debarred well tanks. Express engines needed much more water than coal - they had water scoops, to replenish the tender tanks from track troughs while on the move, but could carry sufficient coal for a London - Edinburgh or Glasgow run.
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
@@pf32900 And the associated weight. Express engines and particularly boilers tended to be sized up to give the maximum allowable axle loading. Carrying more water on the engine part would have made it too heavy or compromised the power.
@johnkeepin75272 жыл бұрын
@@johndavies1090 Except on the Southern Railway, which did not use water troughs - so they had larger tender tanks instead. Incidentally, the “modern” class A1, Tornado, has a reduced amount of coal capacity (something like 7.5 tons cf 9 tons on the originals) on the tender, to allow for more water.
@TerryTheNewsGirl2 жыл бұрын
I think saddle tanks are very cute.
@likklej82 жыл бұрын
Thanks for showing a GWR Pannier tank locomotive.
@darylcheshire16182 жыл бұрын
Puffing Billy (NA class) is a 2’6” guage tank engine. I love the look of the pannier tank engines, first time I saw them was in 1950s videos. I hope to come to the UK in 2024 and see them for myself.
@Steven_Rowe2 жыл бұрын
Jago (really Norman) another great video I am ALWAYS amazed at the little quip at the end of your videos regarding Paterson, I was waiting and thinking, what could old NORMAN say this time, but as usual you came up with something regarding water and tanks. Very good Jago.
@neilforbes4162 жыл бұрын
7:00 You don't know why they were called "Wing Tanks"? Well, don't get into a "flap" over it! 😁
@studioruurd2482 жыл бұрын
Side tanks which are part of the hull of a ship are usually also called wing tanks. Never knew why too. Maybe they were expecting the ship to fly when the tanks were getting empty.
@johndavies10902 жыл бұрын
Similarly, there are 'wings' either side of a theatre stage. Probably because they're on the sides?
@bigblue69172 жыл бұрын
I was on the Bury Line behind the Flying Scotsman last year I must admit of all the types of locomotive the little tank engine is one of my favourites. The A4's and Coronation Class look magnificent but your more likely to see a Jinty or J72
@johndavies10902 жыл бұрын
And they are much handier, and believable, in the space I have for a model railway!
@itsreeah26632 жыл бұрын
As soon as I read the title, the Thomas the Tank Engine theme just started playing in my head LOL
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
I associate him completely with the phrase.
@thatSteveSmith2 жыл бұрын
Great see the East Lancashire Railway feature in this video. Hope you had a pint in the Trackside (Bury) and Buffer Stop (Rawtenstall).
@kaymish61782 жыл бұрын
I liked that radio show that was on in the early 2000's I think the morning pirates did it. Anyway it was Thomas the Tanked engine. In my country tanked is a colloquial term for being very drunk. And it was the antics of a very drunk tank engine.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
Did they put alcohol in your tank, Thomas? Did you go to a pub next to the rails or something?
@stoker1931jane Жыл бұрын
Yes!! Learned a new 🏴word👌🏻, today: shunting. Though I have been familiar with the need/job/task of shunting🚂🚃🚃 (aka switching in 🇺🇲) . I never knew the particular term for it. In 🇳🇱 it's called 'rangeren' maybe derived from 🇫🇷? for re-arranging your trains?!
@johndavies10902 жыл бұрын
Excellent - detailed, clear, lucid, accurate, and beautifuly illustrated. A number of British companies, from Brighton to Glasgow, had some really massive 'Baltic' type tanks for express passenger work in the late 1900s - being very few in numbers, they mostly vanished fairly soon after the 1923 grouping. Confusingly, in Germany a tank engine is a 'tenderlok', while a tender locomotive is a 'schlepptenderlok' (or 'dragging tender engine'!) They and other European lines had some massive tanks for hilly country work, and plenty of small, quaint ones for shunting and bimmelbahn (rural local lines) work. The American railroads weren't so keen on tank engines, save for fast, light suburban short distance work or yard work. Many of theirs had panniers or saddles, because US steam engines were usually built around the boiler (the light frames kept the moving parts in the right places, and the boiler was the backbone, the opposite to European practice) and the tanks were simply hung from it. GWR Pannier tanks were introduced when Swindon adopted the angular Belpair firebox - fitting a saddle tank over it and keeping it watertight was not an easy task, and panniers were a simple solution. Just loved every second of it
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
Sadly, the Baltic tanks seem to have been pretty uniformly unsuccessful wherever you went. Lancashire and Yorkshire, Furness, London Tilbury and Southend, Glasgow and South Western, all ate coal voraciously and oscillated at speed if they ever got there. The LBSC ones were about the best but still not great and even when rebuilt as 4-6-0s were mainly confined to secondary duties. In WW2 they were sent to the GWR mainly for goods trains. Probably poor valve events are the common feature to all of these. Likewise Deeley's 0-6-4 tanks for the Midland which were tried on the Tilbury line but weren't as quick as the LTS 4-4-2s. W.A. Tuplin explained this by concluding that they were "probably the most port-strangled steam engines of the 20th century" - narrow steam passages with sharp bends giving large pressure drop.
@raakone2 жыл бұрын
Informative as usual. They were very popular all over Europe, but in North America, with longer distances being common, they didn't catch on as much, even for shunting...or as we say in the USA and Canada, "Switching" (we also refer to a "set of points" as a "railroad switch", so make of that what you will)
@vehicleandanimalcrossovers2 жыл бұрын
2:09 They did this in 2000 to make the title not so lengthy. It's more convenient for brief conversations. Furthermore Thomas is still referred to his full title even with this slight modification to the title.
@AtheistOrphan2 жыл бұрын
And for goodness’ sake do not mention ‘Thomas And The Magic Railroad’!
@TheTrainMaster152 жыл бұрын
The Southern Z class was actually used to bank trains up the gradient from Exeter St Davids to Exeter Central. Hence the tiny tanks as they didn’t go very far. There is a picture on one in BR days outside of Exeter for a trial but the caption incorrectly states the location as Bournemouth
@Albanwinter2 жыл бұрын
Well I consider myself a partial railway nerd. And I'm so glad I stumbled across you all those months ago. Or wait. Has it been more than a year? I've lost track. Oh dear. Unintentional railway pun. LOL
@mrwizzardknight Жыл бұрын
Please Jago! 🥺 I really want you tell us everything you know about tender locomotives please! 🥺 Yeah! There maybe things I think I already know but I really want you to do it cuz you know better! ;) 😊👍
@LoveAngelLA2 жыл бұрын
loved watching as you are very educational and fun to watch.
@Dan-Athema2 жыл бұрын
Lots of shots from the East Lancs Railway in this video. I know the guards in the Stove R at the end of the video 😄
@nigelcole19362 жыл бұрын
Tanks a lot for another really great video Jago
@captainjoshuagleiberman27782 жыл бұрын
Now that was a smooth segue.
@ricardokowalski15792 жыл бұрын
Did the engines used for shunting have improved bumpers, or brakes? If you are doing a lot of manouvering... would you need better precision at stopping... or repeatedly butting against rolling stock
@alejandrayalanbowman3672 жыл бұрын
Thank you Jago for the mention of the LT&SR. I first rode on the footplate of a LT&SR Tilbury Tank at the age of nine from Shoeburyness to Southend Central. I'm now 81 and still remember it to this day
@Adam-wu8nh2 жыл бұрын
like the east lancs shots in the video nice to see the engins running
@highpath47762 жыл бұрын
Might be worth following this up with the Steam Locomotives of the Metropolitan Railway and London Transport
@DangItshere2 жыл бұрын
Nice to meet you, Yagoo Hazzard!
@julianaylor43512 жыл бұрын
I used to get the Reverend Audin's books out of my local library as a child and I remember a frontis leaf in them, inked drawings with yellow tint. As a child I also once walked past a tank engine in St Pancras, before the end of British Rail steam. This engine was somewhat rusty around its wheels, and working as a shunter of carriages.
@berkshire46072 жыл бұрын
Examples were the LB&SC E2S and A1/A1Xs, Porters, GWR 14XX, and LNER J50s
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
Thomas. You mention his basis and I associate tank engine with him and his franchise almost completely. The basis of any tank engine in TTTE's deeply associated with the franchise for me. The Little Engine That Could's my only other association, other than TTTE and the basis of any tank engine there.
@harrytodhunter50782 жыл бұрын
Little industrial tank engines are my absolute favourite
@sefgrt2 жыл бұрын
Noticed some footage there from Bury. East Lancashire railway. 🙌
@Ian-Steele2 жыл бұрын
How dare you suggest that Thomas the Tank Engine is fictional. You’ll be telling us that there’s no Santa Claus next and that the Tooth Fairy doesn’t exist. 😂🤣😂. Seriously though keep up the good work, I love your style.
@ingo_86282 жыл бұрын
Thats funny, you call a usual locomotive tender engine, but in german its the opposite, a tank engine is called Tenderlokomotive, coz the tender is amalgated into the engine
@LancashireLass2 жыл бұрын
This is nothing to do with the topic on hand, but I come over hopelessly nostalgic whenever I see blue and white railway carriages. I bet they've got that weird scratchy grey moquette on the seats as well. Sigh.
@caw25sha2 жыл бұрын
Now to me they are an unwelcome reminder of the Miserable Seventies. I quite like the previous dark red and cream though, sort of Heartbeat/Miss Marple if you see what I mean.
@highpath47762 жыл бұрын
@@caw25sha I quite like the Blue and White era , though a rake of Southern Railway Green is probably the ultimate hauled by a Schools or King Arthur
@LancashireLass2 жыл бұрын
@@caw25sha I was too young to notice how ghastly the seventies were, it just takes me back to childhood and my innocent desire to be a train driver!
@michaelcampin14642 жыл бұрын
I see 80151. I helped cleaning the rust out of her tanks many weekends at the Stour Valley Railway. Its difficult to get in the tanks at over 6' tall. M
@gothnerd887 Жыл бұрын
1:28 brings new meaning to the term "rail gun" also this means the weapons from Choo Choo Charlies are real!😲
@RobinRense2 жыл бұрын
In Dutch those engines are called 'tenderlocomotief', because it is a combination of the two. It is a bit confusing though, since it doesn't have a tender :P
@fritz462 жыл бұрын
Same in German.
@Sim0nTrains2 жыл бұрын
Wonder what kind of Tank Locomotive would Jago be? My money is on a Pannier Tank! Great Video Jago.
@erical6338 Жыл бұрын
I'd be a US-built tank engine, because that's my country. My trainsona on FanFiction's an S100, which is a US-built tank engine. As a kid, I had a TTTE tank engine personality, because I was an imp. So my trainsona's cheeky and gets into mischief with Thomas. He's her best friend.
@timsully89582 жыл бұрын
Well, well, well (As Mr Beattie said when describing his three new tank engines in 1863) what a splendid episode. Not only did you manage to describe the concept in simple yet not patronising terms, you also managed to get a fabulous Rev Awdry pun at the very end 🤓 I don’t know why, but the older I’ve got, the more I seem to really love tank engines. Admittedly, one of my favourite engines full stop is the Webb Coal Tank (thanks for including it BTW!) as is the Standard 4MT 2-6-4 (thanks for mentioning my line the LTS as well!) but it is the sheer variety in type, shape, size and configuration that appeals, plus the fact there is nothing better than watching a plucky little industrial tank engine thrashing the hell out of a hill pulling a big load 😎 I remember talking to one of the directors of the Swanage Railway who, as luck would have it, was sat adjacent to us on the Wessex Belle dining train (you really must, it’s wonderful!) and he summed it up for me: “Don’t get me wrong, I love having the Pacific’s here and they are beautiful. But it’s much more fun to listen to the old M7 really pushing herself at 25 up the hill.” 😍 Lovely to see a picture of the original Welsh Pony. Had the fortune to see the new incarnation when visiting the fam in Wales and my goodness, it was emotional. Funny how these things that are essentially just a load of lumps of metal stuck together can stir emotions that, frankly, are far more affectionate that at least half the humans I have had the (mis) fortune of meeting 🤔 Ho hum, cheers old fruit! Absolutely loved the footage. So good, I ended up watching it all through again 😎👍🍀🍻
@jean-lucpicard30122 жыл бұрын
That Segway into the surf shark ad was smooth as French butter
@raedwulf612 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this, and learned something I did not know. Tank you!
@thatmarchingarrow2 жыл бұрын
Well played with that ad
@Alex-cw3rz2 жыл бұрын
Were you at the East Lancashire Railway for the background footage?
@Keithbarber2 жыл бұрын
Where did you get your information about these engines? Where did you loco-late it all? And it must have taken you a fair amount of time to "coal-late" it all together And what inspired you to make this film? What was your loco-motivation? Is this going to make you an es/steamed filmmaker?
@RounderRounder2 жыл бұрын
When I become world king, these sort of puns become a capital offence 😐
@Keithbarber2 жыл бұрын
@@RounderRounder so it would be the end of the line for them?
@RounderRounder2 жыл бұрын
@@Keithbarber I hate that you’re so good at this hahaha
@Keithbarber2 жыл бұрын
@@RounderRounder 😀thanks
@tonys16362 жыл бұрын
Oh, the punishment from these is unboilerviable.
@mrwizzardknight Жыл бұрын
Will you explain everything to us what a tender engine is next? :)
@teecefamilykent2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant video sir.
@robertlewis42162 жыл бұрын
Here's a question: anyone know what a Motor Halt was? In London Victoria there's a Victorian tiled wall called 'Map of the System' and it mentions these Motor Halts but I can't find any gen on what they were.
@caw25sha2 жыл бұрын
I think it just means there is an interconnection with a bus service. (Many railways ran their own bus services BTW.)
@pf329002 жыл бұрын
I would guess they were used only by steam railmotors like this one: live.staticflickr.com/5056/5577615139_d19ba02f23_b.jpg When she's had her boiler overhauled, you'll be able to travel in a Great Western one at Didcot Railway Centre: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKXRaY2QrdR5bqs
@johndavies10902 жыл бұрын
Mr Webb may be part right - the GWR refered to their buses as 'road motors'. Before that, a 'motor train' or 'rail motor' was a light steam driven railcar which (hopefully) provided a frequent, fast-ish service, competing with electric tram cars in the big cities, or a low-cost service on a rural branchline. They weren't all that successful, frequently badly underpowered and unable to cope with peak traffic demands. The GWR ones were probably the best - indeed, a working replica has recently been built at Didcot, I believe. A 'motor halt' would there be a small station - often, on the GWR, a bare platform - with minimal facilities.
@highpath47762 жыл бұрын
@@johndavies1090 Possible on the Col Stephens light railways where the oddest rail motors sometimes appeared (based on a model T ford )
@iankemp11312 жыл бұрын
@@caw25sha The original "motor halts" would have been for "motor trains" which were introduced in the early 1900s. Self-contained railmotors with a tiny steam engine built in, or (better) "push-and-pull" trains with an engine attached to one or more coaches. The LBSCR Terriers and LSWR M7s (both seen in the video) were very successful in this role. It was then possible to add lots of extra halts to provide more convenient services. On the Portsmouth-Brighton line, for example, 6 were added between Fratton and Chichester, and 4 between Worthing and Brighton. Nearly all still survive because fast-accelerating electric trains took over in the 1930s. The "halt" names largely disappeared in the 1960s.
@eattherich92152 жыл бұрын
@2:36, nerds to the nth degree says the person avidly devouring Jago's every word.
@AtheistOrphan2 жыл бұрын
Tanks a lot Jago!
@qaphqa2 жыл бұрын
Your writing is so tight, even before thinking about how often you release videos. Well done!