Why I NEVER Focus Stack my Photos...

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Competition winners will be announced in a video in 2 weeks time! Meanwhile, the books start shipping tomorrow - thanks so much for the support! www.jamespopsys.com/store/2019-book

[@DJFoucher]

James Popsys Dang, I could use something like Luminar. Just don’t know if my Dinausor 2012 Mac Mini will handle it.

[@DavidTelesPortugal]

I was here to comment about the books, but no need after all. Excited to receive it

[@ericrjennings]

Pumped for a copy of the book

[@sander5086]

That's great news, almost running out of toilet paper😉

[@lindaholtphotography]

Submitted my photos.... I have Luminar and been using it along Lightroom for a few months. Soooooo.... Your book would be lovely.... (hint, hint) 😂😂

[@MichaelGerrard]

I thought you were going to say you don't use focus stacking because you don't like tripods! ;-)

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

And that! :)

[@MichaelTapel]

No it’s obviously due to the hassle of making each individual sheep in focus...yea you try that 25 times!

[@hauke3644]

Yesterday I managed to take a 20-exposure-picture of a blowball, free hand 😀 It took me two attempts, some luck and a camera with a fast burst (Olympus PEN-F)

[@lylestavast7652]

I do hand held focus stacking and panos all the time in the right light. only an issue in really long exposure situations.

[@rejeannantel1185]

"Avoid Distractions", this has been my motto in photography. "What is not in a picture is as important as what's in it". Sure enough a totally focus photo can lessen the way the viewer will enter the image unless it has a composition with strong leading lines.

[@robindrangmeister3887]

In my opinion replacing the sky in a photograph removes the right to call it a photograph. It's "only" a composite. Why should you travel to distant places and countries when you could simply download some stock images, put them together and call that a photograph?

[@crispin8888]

Absolutely. No satisfaction and no challenge.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

My take is that people enjoy music regardless of whether it was made by a live band or a computer. Nice stuff is nice, regardless of where it came from, in my opinion :)

[@LudwigDesmet]

@@JamesPopsysPhoto maybe so, the viewer of the image will not bother how it was made, but imho it takes away the pleasure for the photographer of 'creating' that great photograph. Why bother going outdoors if you can 'fix' an image on the computer, and mark my words: soon will come the days that all popular 'landscape themes' will also be in a software library, so you only have to combine a nice landscape with an even nicer sky, and the software will match the light conditions in the landscape according to the sky chosen. I rather prefer being out there, making images, enjoying my time and with any luck, make an image I am pleased with from time to time ... but of course, I would also like Luminar or any other brand to sponsor my channel ;-)

[@overnightdelivery]

Yeah because if you can replace the background, you might as well photoshop everything. If it's made clear it's edited than that's fine. But when you get people entering photo contests claiming it's legit when they just replaced the background. Then nobody will be inspired to compose a great shot naturally.

[@raystrickland8665]

Isn’t that like telling Rembrandt he can’t paint a moody sky (which is his style) because it’s a bright sunny day? Masterpieces have been painted (OFTEN) because the artists haven’t had to wait for a “Photographically” perfect day s/he envisions for a specific composition s/he wishes to depict. The finished image the Photographer-Artist is exactly the same concept. Image in Camera + Image clean-up/Image changing (from cropping to further altering) as the P-A envisions is EXACTLY same thing … but in a few minutes, not a few months or years. isn’t it?

[@Phil_f8andbethere]

Absolutely spot on. Having things in extreme foreground as sharp as something 4 kilometres or more away isn't natural. When you are stood in the landscape looking at a scene, if you are looking at a distant mountain, your eyes blur the rock in front of you - so focus stacking is not a natural thing experienced in real life. Having said that it can sometimes make an image more pleasing having sharpness throughout, but I think it is overplayed by many photographers.

[@grabshotphoto7396]

2:19 So what I heard you say is that you use focus stacking so your picture of a shower cap on top of a building would look realistic. I think we define that word differently.

[@lcador9]

I thought I was in for an oppositional moment when first viewing the video title but I must acknowledge you got it perfectly right in camera without any need for post processing. Simply, isolate and eliminate!

[@geo33t]

Focus stacking is for macro, and I'm happy my Canon R6 has this feature - it produces fantastic results.

[@antipodesman]

Until recently I have followed your view on simplicity in photography but I have recently discovered Gavin Hardcastle's videos featuring his landscapes on Vancouver Island (where I also live) and other locations. His philosophy is to avoid boring negative spaces and in my opinion he makes it work specatularly. He has inspired me to try some focus stacking and panoramas. In summary both philosophies can produce excellent photos. Focus stacking and panoramas involve extra post production work though.

[@chuckmoser9662]

I focus stack macro photos because of the thin depth of field. The biggest problem I have is focus breathing and my software not being able to scale the layers well enough to avoid ghosting. This leads to long sessions of panning over the photo cloning out the ghosted outlines.

[@tjc9514]

I'm sure you know about these, but in case you don't, macro rails could be very helpful! I use one and I get much better results than when I was changing my focus from the focus ring. Even when I used the automated focus system in the PhaseOne XF body, I still couldn't get as good of results as I could using the macro rail

[@noregretsyet]

The Nikon D850 has stacking built-in and it works swimmingly.

[@matt309]

Try a parafocal lens

[@paulinap-k8409]

@@noregretsyet do you need particular lens for focus stacking? I wanted to buy Canon camera but on the website its mentioned that focus stacking works only with few lenses.

[@noregretsyet]

@@paulinap-k8409 focus stacking is a technique and not specific to a brand. The Nikon D850 just makes it easier as it is built into the software.

[@BurfieldPhoto1]

I like your line of reasoning. The "everything in focus" trap is an easy one to fall into as a landscape photographer. Your examples are a nice reminder that sometimes out of focus elements enhance an image. Plus no need for a tripod.

[@CristanBoerg]

Pritty much nailed it! Not using this technic makes you think of what exactly is the thing you want to show.

[@justinvanmarle6039]

I’ve lost count of the number of landscape images that I shoot at f/1.4 or f/1.8. Allows me to shoot handheld and isolates the subject matter of the photo. I couldn’t agree more and the day I focus stack will be a dark day indeed. 😉👍🏼

[@oli-haukur-valtysson]

I always respect the fact that you talk about how YOU like to do things... and not telling people what’s right and what’s wrong like so many KZbin “experts” tend to do :-) Cheers 🍻

[@geoffscott5066]

Thanks for this video James. Looking at other KZbinrs videos they seems obsessed with focus stacking landscape scenes. I agree with you not stacking leads to something more atmospheric, less distracting, easy to view. Cheers

[@dmacfilm]

As a wedding photographer, I find using bokeh to highlight the subject incredibly useful! It's the same principle - telling the viewer where to look.

[@joelrollins2841]

I love the way you simplify your compositions. It’s one of the distinguishing characteristics of your work. I also really appreciate the way in which you simplify the photography process. Thanks for sharing your tips.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Thanks so much :)

[@grahambush3226]

Just subscribed to your channel a few days ago and I am loving it. I have been watching your channel for a few months now and decided I needed to subscribe after watching this video. The reason being is that I find myself agreeing with your style and approach to shooting more than other KZbin photogs. And I completely agree with much of what you say in this video. I've been shooting for many years and I am now retired and can now dedicate more of my time to this passion. So one point I would like to make regarding this video is your comment about making sure that when you choose to have something out focus make sure it is truly out of focus and not just a soft focus. Unfortunately, the state of being "out of focus" is a matter of degrees. In an image with great depth using an out of focus technique there will surely be content that is fully out of focus graduating to a soft focus, then to sharpness. This is especially true for landscapes. Any 2D representation of reality should mimic what the human eye and brain can achieve. This is my argument against focus stacking. Of course as an art form photography should not necessarily represent reality but should interpret it according to the artist's vision. My own vision requires something much closer to reality than a focused stacked image.

[@smartyarts]

Dear James, your opinion on focus stacking has some good points! Next time I take a photo, I will incorporate the idea of when and when not to focus stack in order to tell a story in my composition! All the best!

[@DavidCrooksPhotos]

Use the right tool for the job. Use your own skies so it is your own art. Well done!

I love sky replacement so much!! Luminar simply kicks ass imo. I am not that much of a Fan of using Skies of other Photographers but i simply shoot pictures of the sky with may camera or drone when i have the feeling that this kind of sky is awesome. And when i travel or i do a shoot the actual sky does not matter as much. That makes everything so much faster, and better.

[@shimmeringreflection]

Great point around 5:00 about the brain of the viewer not wanting to figure out what you're trying to say in your photos. The brain of the person viewing your photos relies on you to clearly express what you're trying to communicate, giving it a shortcut if you can, so it gets the message sooner. Basically, we should be able to tell straight away whether a photo is good or not -- if we have to sit there thinking about what the hell it is you're trying to say with a photo then it's probably not a very good one

[@jimfok4343]

Welcome to the Luminar world! I just started any type of editing in January and found L4 to be very intuitive.... plus there are tons of tutorials. Love it!! -Elaine

[@Michael-fw5ef]

Btw James, I suffered with nasal problems for 20 years. In Canada, we cant see the doctor when we want to, for we are putting on lengthy waiting lists. So, we have to often fix our own medical issues. Anyways, the best allergy treatment is to use a Neti Pot type of device, fill it with just under 1% salt in distilled water and rinse your nasal passages every 2 days. It does wonders for your allergies. Also helps with keeping colds to a shorter duration.

[@BookwormSkates]

I really loved this explanation because it also explained why I like (some) focused stacked images and dislike others.

[@BrendanvanSon]

I used to tell people that I didn't get allergies, then I spent isolation in the UK with the Hay...

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Haha, we're in this together buddy! And I'll follow you around the world every may from now on...

[@cityzenkane108]

I totally agree. Even in my macro photography I love shallow depth of field. Shallow depth of field creates mystery.

[@migalito1955]

I have the same aesthetics as you in that I like to blur what I don't want to be the primary interest. I mostly paint, but even there I'll blur the background by running a wet cloth across the background in a watercolour image and it makes what is not the subject less busy thus leading the eye to the real intended composition. Good luck with your contest, don't actually need the software, book or to win again, at least for another week or so.

[@LukVonTrug]

I was looking for focus stacking tutorials in luminar for the last two days! good timing, mate!

[@LukVonTrug]

...aaaand now I don't wanna FS more :-D

[@Dahrenhorst]

I'm an old school photographer. My approach to photography is to create the picture the moment I press the trigger, not to use captured digital information to create a picture out of that at the computer. For me the latter is some form of digital design, not photography. Yes I know, that even in photography laboratories there were manipulations possible during the exposure and development process, but that is by far not comparable to what can be done (and is done) at the computer. Because of that I don't use RAW, but do all my pictures in jpg, since for me it is absolutely no fun to "develop" a picture at the computer. Luckily I found a camera, which is very good in calibrating its jpg-output (you can compare that with selecting the correct film in the old days) and can produce outstanding quality that way (Olympus Pen-F). I do not judge people who create pictures at the computer at all, the results can be truly stunning, it's just not my understanding of photography. And yes, I know that I'm old and somewhat outdated.

[@crispin8888]

Old and outdated ? No. Absolutely right. Photography should be photography. Not distortion of reality. Anyone can do that.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Everyone has their own processes which is great :)

[@StephenCotterell]

Thank you for such a clear explanation of how you consider, compose and create your photographs

[@vegardpedersen]

I agree James. It's good to guide the person thru the image and look at what you want, but at the same time I use focus-stacking sometimes. I did that on a clock (as you gave as example). I think it's good for product shots etc. where you need to see the whole thing, but artistic, I think have some blur and direct the audience thru the image is good. I will try to remember to do that in my next photo. Make the forground blurry like on 7:32. it looks great! :-) When you are talking about Luminar, I like to make my pictures completely in-camera and I edit the colors, sharpnes, contrast etc. but I don't like to manipulate the image. Sky replacement looks really cool, but Idon't want to show a "fake" version of my images if I was on let's say a trip to the mountain. If the sky did not look like how I saw it, I think it's a bit weird to replace the sky. But for other things and if the client want another sky, I totaly respect that and if you are making art and the sky can help support that, but generally I don't manipulate my images. How about you James? But it's incredible how you can change a sky that simply.

[@iKeto_gal]

No focus stacking, no full frame, no tripod.... I love you! 💕😘

[@josephcole3187]

Gotta say James, im impressed...the shelves are still holding up. Oh and the sky replacement and structure tools seem pretty cool.

[@chrisperceval193]

Talking of DoF, I remember years ago reading about a bloke who took a lens out of a TV camera (about 4mm or something) and built it into a lens body for a 35mm camera - focus from about 1cm to infinity!

[@lylestavast7652]

Thanks for bringing up the sharpest f-stop point on a lens and shooting at that and focus stacking for best overall sharpness. Few people take the time to really sort out their lenses to find that f-stop or 2 where it performs best. Shooting there will bring up image sharpness quite a bit overall even if stacking isn't the process. I never shoot one of my lenses at f16, 22 or 32 - it's always at f8 or f-14 - nowhere else - things just drop off noticeably. I learned this doing focus stacking about 7 years ago... good video and thoughts.

[@garethjones5068]

100K subs so close now James, you might not focus stack but you're stacking up those subs!!!

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

haha, cheers mate! :)

[@walterwiniana]

Thank you for this video! I’ve never really tried focus stacking in the field! And your video has explained it simply why we don’t need too! I will continue to just focus on the main subject and use the out of focus parts to frame the main part 👍🏼

[@JohnTravena]

Directing the eye is the point of composition. This is the way we see in life - we won’t see the whole scene in equal focus. Focus stacking is giving the viewer a buffet to graze on. Also, I can’t be arsed to do the work.

[@edcAdventures.]

i might be alone in this but my philosophy on photography is make as little edits as possible. for me, its about taking the "perfect" single shot. the edits i usually make is just exposure and lighting correction. i almost never even adjust the colors

[@GeneWaddle]

I"m feeling too lazy to really write anything so. . . 🐑

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Everyone's allowed a day off :)

[@Michael-fw5ef]

I think the #1 characteristic that produces a photo most loved by the audience is SYMMETRY. It seems that you can take a picture of anything and as long as there is symmetry in the photo, many people will like it. Its the reason we want our haircut to look neat, our clothes to be tucked in, our belt to be centered, our faces to be absent of any markings or debris, our beds to be made well and our floor tiles to line up perfectly, etc. The human brain loves symmetry.

[@silversulu]

Flips on YT, randomly picks this vid. Focus stacking...yadaya...ok ok....*throws up most influential pulitzer prize winning book I've ever read* WHOA! *follows up with one of the most iconic film scenes from favorite filmmaker*. WHOAx2. Pays rapt attention for rest of video :).

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

haha, thanks! :)

[@samdensleyphotography]

I totally agree with your non-focus stacking ideology. Simplicity is key. Though it does have its moments, though rare they may be.

[@endtimeimages3284]

I see it that way: Focus stacking is some last resort if the foreground is really close but you still want to have everything in focus front to back (as you say). Other than that I prefer to use the craft, work out a matching depth of field with aperture, focal length and focal point. 👍

[@nevvanclarke9225]

I now use a GFX camera James and occasionally I focus back but only very occasionally. I actually like the mountains in the background to be slightly soft and yes with GFX you're shooting at F1 16 anyway, so you get most of it in focus anyway and if you use the hyper focal method you get pretty much everything you need in focus you just need to be mindful of what you've got in the foreground and your focus Point stacking is a pain in the arse. It really is for the benefit is minimal. Yes, those images and you see in those galleries sometimes look amazing, but I almost think they look a little bit AI to be honest with the mountains in the background, Pin sharp, because that is not how the human eye sees itr, because that is not how the human eye sees it

[@trouwfotomakerij]

Luminar: Mind. Blown. Very impressive AI on all areas. Portraits, landscapes, it's going to help me a lot in optimizing my workflow.

[@michaellaurent7371]

Thinking fast and slow, so good man!

[@cotswolddroner7714]

I always look forward to your videos! And especially now since I'm kinda stuck here at the house most of the time, seeing your videos are really highlights of the week. Thanks James!

[@kevins8575]

A great example of using experience instead of rigid rules. Good job.

[@davidellinsworth22]

Great video. My normal approach would be if there is a composition that requires focus stacking to get everything in focus at midrange apertures.... take the necessary images anyway. That way you have the choice after the fact to focus stack or just pull the relevant "bokeh frame" out from the group of images. I always like to give myself choices afterwards because otherwise there would come a point where I make the wrong decision and regret it

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Me too a lot of the time, cheers David :)

[@nicodimus2222]

Totally agree. I usually don't want everything to be in focus, just the subject.

[@deepotter6774]

Fantastic reminder to be mindful of focusing your viewer’s attention. Brilliant explanation. Thank you!

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

I do focus stack when warranted but I totally get why one wouldn't. Sometimes when I shoot macros of flowers, I stack the bloom but leave the background de-focused. Not into sky replacement, largely because I've seen so many bad uses of it I'm just turned off. I might try this though just for spits and giggles and a chance at free stuff.

[@richardturner81]

I’m of the same opinion as you regarding focus points in landscape images. Luminar does look impressive. It’s mental how advanced digital editing is really. Excited about getting the new book too, thanks for putting it together for us 👍🏻

[@paulj9012]

Focus stacking is good for macro. But once again preference. Also I like the challenge of non focus stacking handheld macro. When you get the shot it’s very rewarding.

[@912582]

Perfect. I thought I was a bit weird not liking focus stacking :) Photo depth and focus on the object is great!

[@gbye007]

The examples you show are lifestyle images which benefit from foreground blur. Landscape photos generally benefit from front to back sharpness for the exact issue you talk about: you don't want slightly unsharp rocks and grasses in the foreground. I think its not so much a personal preference thing so much as types of images needing different technique. You might say that a photographer that selectively uses focus stacking, or narrow depth of field has better versatility.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

And who gets to decide which types of images require which technique?

[@Woodenarrows]

One place where focus stacking comes to be a real asset is in macro and close up photography. The shallow depth of field in these instances almost necessitates the use of focus stacking... Also, been using Luminar since Luminar 2018. Now of course I'm on Luminar 4...

[@joepalmer75]

I never have done focus stacking mainly because of the reasons you stated. Thanks for video.

[@kpluk84]

I agree with you. I ike focusstacking sometimes if the foreground is really close. However If it's further away it's also nice to see some blurry parts if done right.

[@tjsinva]

We knew you'd have a good reason. Rock on!

[@craighosking5617]

I have downloaded luminar 4 and to be honest, it is incredible, that sky replacement is out of this world. However I am troubled. As someone who has watched a lot of your videos, you often say the difference between good photographers and great photographers is patience. It’s going to the same location day after day, month after month just to get the right light, right conditions, right composition, it’s what I love and what I hate about photography. How does it sit with you, when with a simple click you can completely change the sky? Now there is a storm or lighting, or now you are there and the Milky Way just popped out. As someone who makes a living from photography how do you feel about it, because my terrible photos from today just look amazing now and I feel guilty!

[@janewillis2421]

Thank you...i feel every time i watch a youtube on photography you have to focus stack, i cant anyway as i dont have a laptop, so this was a great reminder thats an individual decision, not a rule...cheers

[@TheAndyMaan]

Thanks for the video James, to be honest the main reason I dont focus stack is because I'm too lazy to learn how to do it properly 🤷‍♂️ Looking forward to your book arriving soon 👍

[@sjm.photos]

great video as always. yep focus stacking has its place. i have used it many times for product photography and extreme macro photography but other than that never really use it normally

[@andrear9500]

Stuart James Photography agree, I use it in macro sometimes

[@tarantulacollective]

Recently found your channel...really appreciate your content. You've helped out a lot with learning how to best utilize my Lumix G9! Thank you

[@tonykennedy2344]

Thank you KZbin notification bell to herald the arrival of a new JP Video which I am equal parts proud and embarrassed to say a highlight of my week 👍

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

haha, cheers mate! I don't think too many folk have much excitement going on at the moment :)

[@NickBarang]

I feel for you. I used to get the worst hayfever in the UK and... I've been away for nearly 20 years now and haven't had a summer of pain since I left. It appears I am only allergic to pollen in England. :-) Always enjoy your videos, looking forward to your take on Luminar 4. I am in two minds about buying it myself.

[@ThisIsWideAngle]

Recently watched a video by vox, if i remember correctly. They explained how the intensity of pollen is the result of the reforestation of only male trees in the past centuries due to missunderstood controll over biology. That might be the reason this is a local phenomenon for you too. Have a nice weekend.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Ahh, I'm radiating jealousy, and snot! :)

[@stevemuzak8526]

Focus stacking is great when you print big images and you want to view them at close distance.

[@JonFairhurst]

It’s ironic that I came across this video today. I focus stacked for the first time just yesterday, and my results are great. In my case, I’ve taken macro shots into a carbon bike frame to show the quality of the layup. F/30 wouldn’t get it all in focus. With about 20 stacked shots at f/8, the results are fantastic - and the background is still fully blurred. I could never achieve this without stacking. But I only plan to do this for macro shots. My rule of thumb would be to only use it to get the object of interest in focus. If there are 2+ objects, let the secondary items blur.

[@stephenwoodburn2970]

I was working on a sky replacement in Photoshop last week for a couple of hours. Finally, I used Luminar as a plug-in, replaced the sky in a few seconds and it was 10X better than anything I had done the previous 2 hours. It really has some incredible AI features. I hope your allergies get better soon, James.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Cheers Stephen! And yes, imagine all the box sets we could've watched rather than wasting time in photoshop :)

[@stephenwoodburn2970]

@@JamesPopsysPhoto So true...

[@donaldgould1293]

Thanks James, we forget what we did before digital. I often think images I have seen taken with UW lens and photostacked are too clinically perfect as well as not knowing the point of interest. As you say added benefit of larger aperture, faster shutter = no tripod. I am encouraged to work more on getting this effect. This has really been useful.

[@dgibbsfl]

I enjoyed this one. All of your various thoughts were good food for thought.

[@wayneashton]

I've always wanted to try out Luminar and with lockdown, this is perfect timing, nice one James!

[@paulasimson4939]

Boy, this was a real lesson in composition, keeping things simple and concentrating on what story you are trying to tell. Nicely done.

[@JCJR0411]

I finally found a reasonable elucidation about this issue. Thank you, James. 👏🙏 #simplicity

[@bgray-youtube]

Gave it try there this evening and it's very good and not slowing the machine like lightroom does. Goodbye Adobe, Hello Luminar. Cheers for the Offer Code, they took it on top of offers they already had too, so happy days. Have a good one. Kind regards, BG

[@lisarobertson7011]

Thank you James, I really enjoy watching your videos and love how you keep it real! BTW - highly recommend Claritin for your hay fever - I’m having same issues here in Toronto. Not sure I’m up for learning another photo editing program but will take a look!

[@Mrbluesplayer43]

Many landscape photographers seem to place far too much emphasis on front-to-back sharpness when in reality it is completely unnatural. Our eyes certainly don't see things sharp front-to-back and we only see things sharp where our eyes are actually focused with everything else soft in our peripheral and distant vision. I find some landscapes just don't look 'right' when distant objects are too sharp or crisp. I've never focus stacked landscapes and I'm perfectly happy to let the distance background sharpness fall off a little if I have foreground interest.

[@ChrisLonsberryMedia]

I'm a Luminar fan. At first I thought, "Why do I need another program like that? I can already do everything?" And then I tried it. Yeah... big fan.

[@DJFoucher]

Awesome 😎. Super hyped to catch your video as soon as you published. Love your tips

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Thanks mate :)

[@DJFoucher]

James Popsys My pleasure. Enjoyed the video. I’ll try to hopefully catch you live.

[@I_Am_Bone]

Done and done! With some practice, I could see some benefit, but this could be a little addictive. Especially with so much time at home.

[@maddindscheidschei3830]

James, I like your photography and I like your videos. Having said that, I do disagree with your statement focus stacking is not necessary. BTW - I like what you say about Bokeh, sometimes I have the feeling, that people want to photograph Bokeh and nothing sharp anymore. But I recently started to use focus stacking because of what you say towards the end: There is nothing worse than a bit out of focus. I use MFT, and you have to deal with that problem a bit more. I photograph nature, and I try to be as close as possible to the animals or flowers, and if there are two side by side, you want to have them both sharp and the background not - and you do not want to close your aperture... There focus stacking can help a lot, using tiny steps and limited number of shots. This is where I use focus stacking, and I am using it a lot...

[@colinthecameraguy]

An interesting (nay fascinating) discovery about Luminar 4 (using the Free Trial - Stand Alone version) and RAW files: I use Apple Photos as my main/initial photo editing tool (I also have Infinity Photo) and I initially selected an edited RAW image (taken on my GH4 a while back) and clicked ‘Edit with’ - Luminar which imported a JPEG of about 6MB (meh!) I then took some new images (on the G9) and copied them to Desktop and then selected ‘Open with’ - Luminar which imported a RAW image of about 24MB (that’s better) Finally I loaded the new images into Apple Photos but left them as unedited RAW files and ‘Edit with’ - Luminar which then imported a TIFF of about 161MB (holy moly). So the ultimate test was to select a previous (GH4) edited RAW file (in Apple Photos) but first select ‘Revert to Original’ and then ‘Edit with’ - Luminar which again imported a TIFF of about 113MB. I know right??

[@shaynediersen4114]

James, would you be willing, with enough interest, showing us how and what you use to store your photos once you are temporarily done with them. Also a great help to an ADD learning photographer would be how you label them for archive. Would love to see how you do all of that. Please keep up the GREAT work. Love your channel and your honesty.

[@MikaelJansson84]

Just recently found your channel and I've already ordered both of your books. Really like the content, the style of the videos, and it's given me new ways to look at photography. Keep up the good work, and cheers from Sweden!

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Thanks Mikael, great to hear! Books will be on their way this week :)

[@TheDuanewallmark]

I’m just new to macro photography and I was having major anxiety attacks over the whole stacking issue but now I think I’ll be ok! 😂😂

[@KevinNordstrom]

Great content friend. I learn alot from your channel. I also don't photostack. I also rarely if ever use Photoshop. Mainly I use Lightroom. I'm all new to youtube and landscape Photography and you are one of my favorite KZbinrs. Now that I think about it ...I also make some of my photography look like paintings which isn't the norm either. It's fun to find your own style.

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Thanks mate! :)

[@cathyann1601]

I've used Luminar from it's beginning, and love it! I refuse to layer, so that rules out the way too complicated Photoshop. Yuk! I get the results I want with Luminar... and Topaz... and Photoscape... and Aurora. lol! I've preordered the new version of Luminar scheduled to come out in around December - complete AI! WOW! I can hardly wait. BTW, I love your videos. You are one of my favorite KZbin photographers. Your humor and teaching are first rate!

[@martinhommel9967]

Thanks for the video. I love your train of thought re focus stacking, best used in particular situations. I already have Luminar and really like it for quick adjustments

[@nomind2911]

Great video! Imo I feel there are instances where focus stacking is a nice touch and other instance where it isn't. For me, I feel as if focus stacking is nice to show the viewer exactly what you, as the photographer was seeing. On the other hand I feel that not focus stacking shows the viewer, or directs their eyes, to what you want them to see or focus on. Either way great content and great video!

[@antonoat]

I get hay fever too, never used to, it's a real pain. Your videos are always refreshing and make me think, so thanks for that. PS get an e-bike, it'll transform your life. You've got me interested in Luminar now!

[@JamesPopsysPhoto]

Cheers mate - it's on the list :)

[@twbrkfd1733]

Excellent explanation of when NOT to use focus stacking! However, there ARE instances where it is a boon! The latest in-camera focus stacking is a boon to macro photography. It eliminates all those clunky and expensive focus rails; either manual or computerized; rendering them obsolete. A circuit board is one area where ALL of the subject needs to be in focus. With Helicon Focus there is no need for all that fiddling like you are doing in Adobe. Just pick the first frame in a set and click render!

[@markusviol200]

Luminar is great, sadly you couldn't upgrade from 3 to 4 which was quite a joke as the version 3 was only out for a year. Nethertheless, i'm still happy with my "old" version, because i never change the skies or use the AI a lot.

[@KrazMyth]

jesus you are so close to 100K keep going man

[@lisabradley9288]

Wow! That sky was so cool, loved it. it amazes me what you can achieve in post processing. Thanks James for another good video 🙂

[@ZachLovettRaces]

THAT FIRST PHOTO IS LITERALLY MY PC WALLPAPER (but the whole group of mountain peaks with the little village at the base and it goes all the way to the right at the lake or sea or whatever body of water it is). Noice.

[@paylnyles]

Re: your Hay fever take 1,000mgs of Vitamin-C, 2 to 3 times a day. In all the supermarkets not that expensive but start with 1x1,000mgs on your first day and work up to 3,000mgs spread throughout the day. Vitamin C is a natural antihistamine with no drug worries x.

[@yveshetu8026]

I find your explanation and demonstration very good.