It's quite interesting to see how this would have been if Murray was in his prime with no injuries. Thank you COURT LEVEL TENNIS. M
@AZ-cj8du6 ай бұрын
No one in this era beats Big 4 in their prime.
@recration5 ай бұрын
@@AZ-cj8du i disagree. sinner and alcaraz can beat the big 3 in their prime. the level they played at the us open was insane.
@AZ-cj8du5 ай бұрын
@@recration that tells enough you don't even watch the big 3....
@jonathanb14064 ай бұрын
@@AZ-cj8du They weren't unbeatable. Players like Del Potro, Wawrinka, Thiem, Tsonga, on their day could blow them off the court. The biggest difference between them and the rest is mentality and consistency. To talk like Alcaraz and Sinner don't have the tennis ability nor the mentality to be able to beat any of them "in their prime" is silly
@sandeepshahrao19858 ай бұрын
Need More and More Videos of this for Practice ❤. Love this View. Need More Clarity like 4k Technology❤
@172prv5 ай бұрын
Sinner's groundstrokes are incredible
@louisedyhlen32342 ай бұрын
who would be a better player: murray with federer's forehand (cuz jesus christ at times his forehand was attrocious), or federer with murray's backhand (not 2hander in perticular but rather the effectiveness and ability to do things with it)
@The4.0Guy2 ай бұрын
I'd go with fed because his serve was more effective, especially his second serve
@HoangTruong-vk7ek27 күн бұрын
Murray for sure. Trading Murray's forehand for Fed's is a massive upgrade for Murray and it's basically his only weakness besides his 2nd serve. Fed's backhand isn't as bad of a shot as Murray's forehand and although Murray's backhand is better it doesn't improve Fed that much overall.
@angejo55918 ай бұрын
Why does Andy Murray have a tennis ball on his head