Jarrah White's question during NASA's Artemis I Post Flight Update Media Teleconference.

[@liquidus2172]

My qustion to them would be, why did you send the radiation manequin "moonkin" inside the Artemis I module, while knowing that the Apollo astronauts were safe from radiation during their space flights to the moon?

[@justincox1685]

DIfferent hardware. Different program goals. Different mission. NEXT!

[@liquidus2172]

@@justincox1685 I though that they already have sufficiently adecuate "hardware" to protect the astronauts from radiation, why use something else ?!

[@brianramirez4953]

BS. Nice try, NOT. Next@@justincox1685

[@Lukewarm109]

That answer sounded like a mouth full of word salad.

[@marcoj.3120]

Jarrah, do you know what their excuse is for having next to zero photos of such a historic mission? Would you not think they'd have a huge collection of pictures with modern HD cameras to show off with? Instead - nothing of the moon except a blurry thing that you have to be told is the moon to identify it, no grand pictures of the Earth as they come around the other side. Just pathetic. And suspicious.

[@WhiteJarrah]

What are you talking about? I watched those webcasts live. They had heaps of HD videos and photos of the far side of the Moon and also some views of the Earth and Moon seen during the apogee of its distant retrograde orbit.

[@criztu]

@@WhiteJarrah please share the link to those webcasts. I tried to watch the live cameras and all I could find were 3d models instead of actual footage :(

[@WhiteJarrah]

@@criztu kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKe6pYGuaLuCi6M

[@justinmadrid8712]

Right. I stayed up all night to watch the Artemis 1 mission live. All we we got were "scenes". Most of the livestream was of people doing things on Earth, or those CGI animations. Almost anytime something interesting happened, such as the 'skip re-entry', they would tell us the cameras would be going out during those interesting moments for various reasons. Basically, we almost never got a clean, uncut video of the spacecraft going from point A to point B. One moment the craft is far away from Earth, then we get several minutes of people walking around mission control, then they cut back to Artemis and it's already in low Earth orbit. Now. Is anything I just said proof that Artemis 1 is fake? No. _However,_ since I understand how dishonest and corrupt the U.S. agencies are, and since I understand that the Apollo missions were faked, this leads me to suspect that Artemis is being faked as well. And what they showed us is unfortunately not convincing to me at all.

[@bertjesklotepino]

@@WhiteJarrah nice link. Have you watched it? Kinda looks fake, doesn't it?

[@stevemt3238]

That was the standard, evasive, non-answer by NASA. They are very consistent only when it comes to not answering specifically-worded questions.

[@justincox1685]

It's one guy. Is he supposed to know every technical detail of every subsystem of Artemis/Orion?

[@stevemt3238]

@@justincox1685 Agree, but that is NASA's continuing problem. They want us to believe, but they cannot answer questions that would help us to believe. It's like asking a question to the IRS. They don't know either.

[@justincox1685]

This wasn't a tech briefing. And you're not addressing the experts responsible for shielding and sensors. Hu has a lot of responsibilites. Being an expert on every technical detail of every subsystem is not one of them.

[@shortkari]

Great question! 👍👍 Please keep us updated regarding this topic. Very interesting to see how this develops. I am curious to see if Artemis 2 and 3 will happen as they planned. Will Gateway happen and will they actually send humans there. Radiation seems to be a big problem indeed.

[@photon-9551]

Surely Apollo flights gave all the scientific data neededon radiation levels and the ability of the command module to withstand them. Why would artemis need to repeat the experiments and monitoring?

[@Aragami_Sensei]

So technically they are gueneapigs for the first real moon landing.

[@wendellbonin7059]

Yes; that's why they were so distraught at the first press conference.

[@primemac3dstudio18]

Sounds like they waved this question away. Did they in truth answer the question? I don't think so. That was a none answer.

[@WhiteJarrah]

To say the least, his reply was not very reassuring.

[@stephenbrandon3470]

We’ll NASA. Those certainly were words, and you’re not familiar with the events? What in the actual F? What were the readings? Aren’t we paying for these missions? Tell us without telling us you need water or lead to shield and that it weighs too much without telling us.

[@justincox1685]

Why would expect this guy to have all that detailed technical info readily available?

[@armandobalance9208]

You're truly a hero, Jarrah!!

[@justincox1685]

Why? Because he asked a program manager for technical details he's not going to know? How is that heroic? Did he save some children from a burning house? You're ridiculous.

[@brealistic3542]

Time to send the radiation proof turtles out ! 😁

[@giakon1]

very good... they have the radiation protection! thanks god. which is the material and which are the characteristics?

[@twistedbydsign99]

I'm grinning ear to ear Jarrah I know the subtext of the question

[@justincox1685]

You sending Jarrah money then? Or just sitting there grinning?

[@twistedbydsign99]

@@justincox1685 No I'm not sending him money. Just happy for him that he got to ask Nasa a cheeky question

[@bertjesklotepino]

Jarrah, again an offer. 2.5k . Show us how the Apollo 13 crew was able to build a device that could filter the air so they could survive. Build it with similar materials, and test it in similar conditions. Let's drop the radiation issue. Show us how they managed to survive building something out of a plastic box, some other stuff and duct tape. And, it worked. In my opinion this could also work on submarines. Right? Sure, we have nuclear reactors taking care of it, but certainly this might be a good idea for the subs that do not have a nuclear reactor onboard, right? It would be awesome to see if the device they manufactured onboard Apollo 13 was able to supply the onboard astronauts with enough oxygen to keep em alive during their trip back to earth. SO: 2.5 k i am willing to donate if you perform that test in a video. Simply build the contraption, lock yourself up in a small chamber inside a vacuum chamber (might require a large vacuum chamber to hold the smaller chamber and you inside of it, so i guess NASA???? Hahahaha). Anyways, the conditions have to be replicated as close to the original as possible, obviously. Which requires a gigantic vacuum chamber which can house a smaller chamber in which you can sit and do the experiment with the plastic box, some stuff, duct tape, to filter the air. Let us see how long you can stay alive on your own in such conditions. Wouldn't that be a nail in the coffin? If you could prove there is NO WAY they could have constructed some kind of device to keep em alive, filtering the co2 out of the air????? I mean: it requires a bit more stuff that what they used to filter the air, right? If it was that simple, ey? In my opinion it is rubbish. So. Why not replicate it? Expert divers may be a source for help

[@trexx32]

More lies

[@odinallfarther6038]

Jarrah I have a question i lake the ability to calculate if an object is dropped from the hight of 8 meters in 1/6 gravity what would be the speed be on impact ?

[@wendellbonin7059]

Just consider Von Braun statement "3 times the size of the Empire State building" and the 8/1 fuel to payload ratio. "The earth is a closed system" ISS Statement "Currently we can't fly above LEO; maybe one day in the future we will be able" / It's like about 3000 miles downrange & out of fuel. The moon only stays in orbit because it's traveling at more than 7 times the speed of sound. Even if we could escape gravity there's no spacesuit that can withstand the PERFECT vacuum & extreme temp's & radiation.

[@justincox1685]

@@wendellbonin7059 You're high AF. Jesus.

[@grippipethin2796]

There was no attempt to answer the question.

[@johnnyinnftmyers]

total non answer, what is the radiation protection, why don't know know what the measurements were, they dont allow follow up quetions for a reason

[@larncieldarknciel440]

I would have liked to see his silly face after the question was made. NASA never a straight answer.

[@michaeljcollins463]

Good question , bad answer!

[@HikeCampHarvest]

That's a laugh. How are you protecting with readings? Ugh.

[@odinallfarther6038]

Jarrah Have you heard of a KZbin channel called the common sense sceptic he has a vary interesting take on Elon musk you might find enlightening .

[@justinmadrid8712]

What is his take?

[@odinallfarther6038]

@@justinmadrid8712 go have peep he does an excellent job detailed and well researched he debunks waffle look for debunking Elon musk on his channel it as big an eye opener as jarrah on the moon landing and he appears to have the appropriate skills for the job .

[@odinallfarther6038]

@@justinmadrid8712 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mV6peKp6echgqZo

[@odinallfarther6038]

That's the link I don't if it will work when I post links on KZbin they tend disappear or become dead links

[@odinallfarther6038]

@@justinmadrid8712 part one is the intro to his life it goes into detail of his space escapades later

[@ginskimpivot753]

*_"It is my conviction that what the Chandrayaan-2’s OHRC actually resolved was the unmanned relay probe that would have been necessary to dupe anybody on the outside with the technology to track the spacecraft."_* LOL! Yean, right. I think you may have a little more trouble dreaming up excuses for the features in the A12 1magery. Still looking for handouts, I see. Some things never change, eh?

[@WhiteJarrah]

Didn't read my follow up article, did you? www.aulis.com/j_white_col4.htm

[@ginskimpivot753]

@@WhiteJarrah Thanks. I have now. *_"As stated above, I suspect that NASA’s DSN received the Apollo 12 pictures first while ISTRAC received the Apollo 11 image first. And thus NASA had the opportunity to give the Apollo 12 picture the same manipulations as the LRO pictures, but not the Apollo 11 photo. Hence the obvious difference between the two images. If true, a possible explanation for these stray pure white pixels is that the editor’s mouse or stylus slipped while editing and went unnoticed. Perhaps they didn’t have the time to check? After all, NASA was merely assisting ISRO with the tracking. Maybe they only had a limited amount of time to edit the picture before passing it onto ISRO?"_* So, _'maybe, could be, possibly, suspectedly.'_ Got it. A11's an actual landed craft - a relay probe. It could have been used similarly to Zond 5 - which uttered a single sentence of voice, not flight/surface conversations and telemetry over a period days from varying distances. But A12 is pure manipulation, possibly with accompanying little unnoticed slips of the stylus on the graphics pad. And the baseline refencing used, is the fake LRO imagery, fake surface imagery from the faked A12 mission, and faked orbiter imagery. So, logically speaking, if you combine a list of negatives you get a rational positive. Is that it? Baron was murdered because he knew about some contractor safety issues. But Bill Kaysing died in hospital aged 82, having been a key insider at NASA with full knowledge of the hoax, despite never having worked there since 1963. Or did NASA just ignore the old fool as a wacko, proven later by his admission he got the idea from a homeless Nam vet? I may come over to your side any day now! No, really.

[@justincox1685]

@@ginskimpivot753 JW's take is pure conspiracy wonk conjecture seasoned with just enough real science to convince the sycophants to (hopefully, fingers crossed) open their wallets. Text book charlatan.

[@andycapp9063]

Collins smoked you

[@WhiteJarrah]

You sure about that? www.aulis.com/j_white_col3.htm

[@andycapp9063]

Slow motion isn't a true reflection of low gravity anyway.

[@justinmadrid8712]

@@andycapp9063 Slow motion simulates low gravity close enough to convince most people.

[@justincox1685]

@@justinmadrid8712 Most people are stupid.

[@ildanny80]

Why do you ask question he's not familiar with ? He cannot be aware of the purpose of those sensors or... what the hell are solar flares ?? 😁

[@CarlMarksmoney]

Blah blah blah