Jeju Air Crash Raises Safety Concerns; How Safe Is Flying on a Boeing 737 | Firstpost America

[@markgideon23]

now cheapest economy seats at the back becomes priceless after wathing this video

[@TheUnknown-mg8fv]

@markgideon23 soon first class life support will be in the back lol

[@iroc341]

In the tail section , it's always the strongest part on the plane

[@karensayer3089]

I have always sat at the back of airlines. For this reason. The crash San Francisco?. The tail broke off. Question answered.

[@alexlo7708]

@@karensayer3089 And for landing on water, tail section are prone to the most dangerous place on plane.

[@hopespringseternal2624]

My late father was involved in a plane crash. He survived; the others did not. He always told me to sit in the back of a plane. And so, I have done just that.

[@kashpandya5321]

We are almost in 2025. We have technology for autonomous cars and sending human to the space. Unfortunately when it comes to aviation, we have not yet fully overcome old issues such as bird strikes and landing gear not deployed. No improvements in such very important reliability issues and still seeing such disastrous results. Today perhaps we might have missed but we all fly routinely, who knows tomorrow it will be our turn. I sincerely urge FAA, NTSB and ICAO to strictly enforce safety criteria in the aviation industry. In the space industry if two astronauts die because of failure, they shutdown whole operations for years. I think every human life is important, we can’t just take the safety criteria for granted. Gold bless and protect everyone.

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

"Unfortunately when it comes to aviation, we have not yet fully overcome old issues such as bird strikes and landing gear not deployed. No improvements in such very important reliability issues and still seeing such disastrous results." Speaking as an engineer (which you are obviously not) you cannot prevent engine damage from bird strikes. Any shield which would stop a bird would obstruct the air flow through the engine and stop it working properly (or at all). At one time, a bird strike could cause an engine to explode and send shrapnel into the passenger cabin - this no longer happens - bird strikes are common and all pilots are trained to fly on one engine when the other has shut down to a bird strike. Complaining about not eliminating engine damage due to a bird strike is like complaining that your car collides with a pedestrian who runs out into the road in front of you.

[@johncheresna]

While I have no love for Boeing (I did work for them). I am not rushing to judgment on the cause of the crash. I am angry about the concrete wall that had no business being there.

[@GHOST-hd4wm]

It is pointless to focus on an issue that has absolutely nothing to do with the plane's inability to land properly. The plane suffered an electrical systems failure as a result of flying over fault lines which are known to emit electromagnetic pulses that disrupt electrical equipment. The route that the plane took led it over a coastal area which is a subduction zone, as the Pacific ocean is currently experiencing compressive stress.

[@krista3494]

Three years ago, the airline company experienced the same type of accident with the same flight. So, it paid around $200,000 as a penalty.

[@ApoloKabali]

Same with me Iam not going to jump the gun,I worked on remodification blueprints of 747. I still have confidence in the company.

[@GHOST-hd4wm]

@@johncheresna What do you think caused the all of those Boeing 737 Max planes to crash just a few years ago? They were all exposed to electromagnetic pulses as they flew over fault lines that disrupted and damaged their electrical systems.

[@GHOST-hd4wm]

@@johncheresna What do you think caused the Malaysian airlines flight MH370 to go missing? It was exposed to electromagnetic pulses originating from a nearby seismic event in the South China Sea. The plane suffered a complete electrical systems failure which caused it to climb to an extremely dangerous altitude, leading to the asphyxiation of the crew and passengers. The plane then flew autonomously for several hundred miles before crashing into the ocean.

[@szvqorwnpstahskypfwmp9821]

Anyone with half a brain could tell that the bird strike could not have affected the landing gear whatsoever, even if it had damaged the both engines because the pilots could have easily pulled down the landing gear manually. My theory is that something catastrophic must have happened to the plane especially with the engines when it was about to land for the second time, which forced the pilot to land in sheer panic with no landing gear, no flaps, and at such high speed. It is truly mysterious. Again, something horrible went wrong with the plane before the landing, which forced the pilot to do what he did. Lastly, if the runway had more buffer zones and was better equipped with a wall that was made to be broken instead of solid concrete, the outcome would have been so much better. RIP to the victims. The wall actually was the main culprit of so many deaths and not the bird strike as many Koreans believe!!

[@Ahoooooooo]

🤔 you are right . I really believed the birds story 😪 They are still lying to us 😠

[@biceps2007]

Shutting down a good engine seems possible. No other plausible explanation for the tearing hurry to land.

[@mydad156]

Why don't think easy way landing gear hadn't working?

[@58biggles]

​@@biceps2007it wouldn't be the first time a wrong engine was shut down

[@michaelbrown8619]

The “wall” everyone is referring to is a platform that was built to mount the localizer antenna awry. It is not the perimeter wall. It is made to break away and apart. Some of the wreckage slid into it but “the wall” had nothing to do with the wreck. The platform was totally stupid and is what killed most if not all of the people on that plane.

[@bearwhite98]

people gonna be fighting to sit in the back of the plane now ...will you risk your life for first class ?

[@KevinAlvarado-n2u]

I've been doing it for years. 🤣

[@captainlockes2344]

In the San Francisco incident, the tail section broke off and only the people in the last row died.

[@ClarencegHamm]

First class= first dead

[@hafiizh79]

They will relocate the first class to the back, with direct aerobridge to it

[@PakMail-i2z]

First in, first out

[@Garmonbozia]

best air travel survival tip; don't take the car to the airport.

[@KevinAlvarado-n2u]

You misspelled Boeing.

[@TheAryanKnight]

Then on the bike to the airport?

[@ProjectManagement-LandandBuild]

Pilots initially attempted to land using Runway 1 in Muan. One ground observer reportedly stated that the Jeju Air 737 flew through a flock of birds during this first approach. A number of popping sounds came from the aircraft’s engines after it hit the birds. Its landing gear was extended at this time. The flight crew went around and declared a MAYDAY soon afterwards. At this time, it is not clear how much damage the Jeju Air 737 suffered after hitting those birds. However, its pilots soon decided to immediately return to land on runway 19, i.e. the other end of the runway. Both engines could be locked in full thrust from the go around, landing gear is retracted, flaps stowed and the aircraft gains speed and altitude but then it appears that the pilots were unable to deploy the landing configuration due to uncontrolled thrust as the flaps, slats because gear would be ripped off above a certain speed. An uncontained failure in one of its engines might have caused extensive damage to the landing gear, flight controls, and engine controls. What is clear is the pilot chose to put the plane on the ground as quickly as possible, which is ideal when losing hydraulic fluid and subsequent control of the aircraft. One major contributing factor is the concrete wall that should never have been there! I have no doubt that if a collapsible antennae was installed as it should be, more people would be likely alive today. -Nalliah Thayabharan

[@stuffstoconsider3516]

It still doesn't add up. Landing gears are meant to be deployed by shear gravity.

[@Solisium-Channel]

I also thought that having a concrete wall there was dumb even if they landed from the wrong side.

[@ED-vm5oy]

Wtf are u talking ......what if we blame the wall for Boeing mistake 😅😅😅

[@neelabraham9819]

This had nothing to do with Boeing specifically: 1) This wasn’t the infamous 737 Max model 2) All passengers were alive till the plane crashed on to the concrete wall. Why would you have a concrete wall at the end of the runway should be the question.

[@annonymousvector1690]

No, you can still blame Boeing. What about the landing gear? Why didn't it deploy? If it was a Bird Strike issue, it should not have affected the landing gear

[@jnkrm1]

Bird strike before landing gear retraction may pose an issue although i can't vouch for this.

[@gosh1495]

Why this planned did belly landing ? Why gears did not come out

[@marlonsukura530]

I agree.

[@Kilo1992]

@@annonymousvector1690the plane that exploded has been flying for more than 15 years. So that is not on boeing at this point. It’s like saying i bought a toyota 3 years ago and got into an accident because the break pad fails. Obviously it is maintenance issue.

[@AB-ku]

It is simple; aviation industry isn’t evolving enough to improve safety as the impact of these types of disasters could be reduce by installing a rear parachute to the tail of the aircraft that can reduce the speed of this beast in such conditions.

[@JP-pq9xi]

That.... Is so.... Stupid hahahhaa

[@MrMwadila]

@AB-ku is right, a rear parachute could make a big difference here between life and death in this situation. Space shuttle use rear parachute upon landing. So this is not stupid as you think if you understand physics. I am an airplane maintenance engineer. One of the reasons airplane Manufacturers Airbus and Boeing don’t install that mechanism U.S. because of additional unnecessary weight on the aircraft.

[@chichichiyomi__]

​@@MrMwadila More weight which means bigger engines, which needs more fuel, which means bigger fuel tanks, which means more money. It's kind of like money is actually the sole reason why airlines dont do this.

[@MrMwadila]

⁠@@chichichiyomi__you are right, in the end, the bottom line is money unfortunately. Finding the right balance between safety and cost effectiveness can be very tricky for most businesses, including non-aviation sectors.

[@First1ToComment]

Rear seats of planes are going to be more desirable now 😊

[@josebastardes]

safer than landing on airstrips with mount-like walls at the end of them

[@pgreen8531]

Absolutely right ✅️ i will be asking what type of plane is being used

[@sylviamowatt9256]

If it's a Boeing am not going 😢

[@mamasan7902]

That’s just stupid! Stay home’

[@SilverSun-o1b]

Then with what you are going?😂😂

[@tomyumbaby4543]

@@SilverSun-o1bairbus?

[@SilverSun-o1b]

@@tomyumbaby4543No Airbus planes in all airlines ,countries

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

@@SilverSun-o1b "Then with what you are going?😂😂" Airbus - but what do I know, I'm only an engineer who has worked in aerospace for decades...

[@jxpat]

The statistics are flawed. SAN said "Airplane travel is the safest form of travel". However, flying on a Boeing plane is significantly less safe than the industry average.

[@miltonsantiago6086]

Can you back this up with stats or are you just talking out of your a$$?

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

"Airplane travel is the safest form of travel." As a statistician, I'd take issue with that statement. True, air travel is safest per mile because of the distance of most aircraft journeys. Per journey it is no safer than driving your car.

[@jxpat]

@TheRealWindlePoons 💯 I should've used quotes. 👍

[@DEEYANASE]

1) A couple of thousand bird-strike incidents happen every year worldwide. 2) Nearly a thousand of Boeing 737-800 are still flying safely. So, either S.Korea didn’t do the maintenance work properly or something was wrong with the pilot.

[@MarekKolenda-cr8vr]

Unfortunately right

[@TheGreenlove87]

Unfortunately I think it’s human error as well. Prayers for the victims.

[@jnkrm1]

How much area was left as buffer zone beyond the runway is also something to look into.

[@ClarencegHamm]

6.3 million flying miles,I would never get on a boeing - Chinese C919 flys good too

[@jnkrm1]

@@DEEYANASE or the second engine too was hit by a bird and stalled soon after they decided to go around

[@1mikon]

Why was there a concrete wall?

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

And who did the risk assessment before they built it? They needed to get height on the localiser hardware but other airports do it by building higher towers rather than opting for a concrete "tank trap".

[@fubub3595]

It easy to blame now, but runway was long enough, the pilot landed in midle of runway, plus the seep was way too fast ,even if there was no wall he could have crushed to houses nearby

[@Perserk1120]

These Boeings have been flying all over the world. My brother who works in US FAA was telling me that the way the pics coming out looks like there might be a pilot issue. He noticed that since the plane already made a turn around once (they managed to retract the flaps already), why are the flaps and gears still not opened on landing? We know that the gears have a manual release and the flaps also has an electric backup just in case hydraulics are gone. We see the right engine looks shut up already so why was it that it's the one in reversed mode instead of the working left engine on landing ? Pilots should be able to land plane with only one engine which I think what the pilots initially planned. The conclusion probably is the pilot shut off the good engine which will cut off all hydraulics. There is just not enough time to pull the gears manually or the flaps. of course, we cannot be sure of anything concrete unless the investigation was completed. These are all theories...

[@KevinAlvarado-n2u]

Is that how they taught you to deflect at tge Boeing shareholders meeting? Imagine listening to some arm chair captain in the comments. Forget all that noise! All the whistleblowers are Aviation Experts, and I'm listening to the Whistleblowers!! And the CEO, CFO and the Board of Directors should be in jail!!!

[@andrewlim7751]

12 major crashes for 737-800 including this one killing all passengers and crew except 2, and btw, did your brother from FAA getting payroll by Boeing after retirement?

[@andrewlim7751]

​@@KevinAlvarado-n2u It's a tradition for FAA officials to retire in Boeings. 😂😂

[@jnkrm1]

​@@andrewlim7751its better you know how many of these are attributed to human error before putting out statements. i am not a boeing fan. You can curse FAA for 737 max incidents not the 800. It has a good proven record.

[@KevinAlvarado-n2u]

@andrewlim7751 Boeing is basically a real life horror movie!

[@argxoxo7326]

After it was selected as the airport construction site, many Korean experts opposed it, and the basis for their opposition was very scientific and persuasive, but a local influential politician pushed ahead with the airport construction. The area has a migratory bird habitat that is very large even by global standards. After the airport was completed, it was not permitted to operate international flights until recently. Although it was permitted to operate international flights in December 2024, it was the result of politicians from local political parties pushing ahead. A major disaster occurred 21 days after the international flight permit was issued. It is an airport that was built solely for political interests and election purposes, ignoring aviation experts and scientific evidence. It is the worst airport that runs a huge deficit every year and cannot be operated without subsidies from the central government.////

[@Felipe-n3j]

Don’t blame the bird, the wall, the pilot, the Boeing plane landing gear & brakes system is not working when the experience pilot had safely landed the plane . The pilot just can’t stop the speeding plane that’s why it crash into the wall.

[@sierraromeomike]

You are making baseless statements.

[@MalcolmVirgil]

I have always loved to fly. It's one industry you can't shortcut costs or quality. Done flying.

[@dilankachalathi1696]

It’s not proved yet there’s fault in Boeing, don’t spread false information

[@thomcorsam5541]

Like anybody is gonna prove it's Boeing😅.

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

Everything is pure conjecture until all evidence has been investigated. Its human nature to hypothesise though.

[@davidcole333]

videos like this are really not needed and do nothing but inflame the masses.

[@vincecarlo]

BOEING can Land WITHOUT Landing gears ?

[@dilippatel55]

There is always problem of the audio on the female who is reporting. Her voice has lack of clarity and the audio is not balance for clarity.

[@TamasHejja]

Is it A.I.sound

[@ClarencegHamm]

Maybe she was a dei hire?

[@TomZart]

YOU NEVER SAID GOODBYE & WHY !! You never said I’m leaving You never said goodbye. You were gone before I knew it And by plane crash I know why. In life I loved you completely In death I love you still. I hold a place in my heart That only you can fill. It broke my heart to lose you But I know you’re not alone. A part of me left with you As the seeds of death were sown. Tears are a love-mates humble gift When it's time to say goodbye Though the eyes are wet and swollen With time and patience they dry. By Tom Zart

[@bradhearne2897]

I have worked on 737 for 35 years! The pilot blew it, and the airport design is deadly at best! Its easy to bash on boeing , this time not justified!

[@gregorygant4242]

The pilot, crew panicked and rushed the landing they had enough fuel and they should have kept circling the airport figured out what to do then calmly land the plane.

[@ClarencegHamm]

Good luck with that nonsense

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

"Its easy to bash on boeing , this time not justified!" Boeing's safety reputation is already in tatters though. It will take years to rebuild public confidence to the level it used to be. I choose not to fly Boeing.

[@thumbikonkwawazingwe4334]

Not fair for Boeing. Clearly it wasn't manufacturer's fault. It's the solid concrete structure at the end of the runaway. Avionics and actuators can fail despite how good the manufacturer is.

[@DLWELD]

Sure, for deaths per mile travelled planes are better than cars - but...if you look at deaths per hour in a vehicle - planes are more dangerous.

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

For crashes per number of journeys, planes are no better than driving your car - remember - flying isn't dangerous, crashing, that's dangerous.

[@yesyes9698]

I have 7 flights coming next month and I'm having a freaking panic attack. Not all of them Boeing, but yes Airbus and B.

[@forzaazzurri1471]

I also have 4 flights lol I can’t even

[@Erenabella]

No need to freak, calm down. Millions of people and planes are flying around the world as we speak. We can’t escape faith, it doesn’t matter where you are, what you’re doing, when your time is up your time is up! We think we can avoid death by making alternate choices, we just fool ourselves constantly. So, take it easy. Look at faith, how only those 2 people survived? Their time was not up.

[@ClarencegHamm]

Id rebook all Airbus, Embraer,C919 if you value your life-

[@SH_space]

I understand that flying can be scary - and perhaps the facts won't change that, but the facts are still facts - that being that aviation remains the safest mode of transportation out there. Statistically, if you're terrified of flying, you should be 100x more terrified of driving.

[@Dr_Reason]

You state that the 737 Max 9 is faulty using the present tense. State the specific fault you are alleging.

[@DongSee-r5e]

That concrete supposedly lower than the runway. We did some approach light on air base

[@manjulaboteju1431]

All commercial aircraft must've two mega parachutes on the top and one at the tail end with auto function system.... Etc

[@thumbikonkwawazingwe4334]

Please, your Ideas should be seconded with some scientifically/ physics backing. It's easier said than done.

[@rolandgo6744]

The concrete wall took 178 lives. Talk about it.

[@bobdeengineer7396]

This reminds me of the test dummies crash videos but sadly these were my fellow human beings 😢😢😢 rest in peace dear souls 🙏🙏🙏

[@jigmeyangchen3952]

Boeing should take a step back and concentrate on quality rather than on quantity.. No one cares about the beauty of an aircraft SAVE safety. Even if the airplane looks ugly but if it's technically and aerodynamically sound, WE don't mind. Making the engine large which goes against the aerodynamic laws then making some software to handle that is not required. Pls respect the physics.

[@SwamiKripananda]

I'm going!

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

Building a concrete wall at the end of the runway is like replacing a car's steering wheel airbag with a long steel spike. Don't Korean civil engineers do risk assessments?

[@user-ci5le3uk5l]

Exactly I've been informing my friends and abroad studying college mates to avoid Boeing at all cost and only take it if there's no other way. BOEING IS MASSIVELY UNRELIABLE OUTSIDE US.

[@nfccard677]

VIP SEAT IS MOST FATAL PART IN SEAT IN AIRPLANE

[@grdainylung5216]

Its sad and scary .Why we cant invent something to prevent such incidents in future ? We need more competition to Boeing and Airbus to enhanced technological advancement in aviation industry for safety.

[@hunnay688]

Just that and people are already making judgement , they can't make something perfect

[@syedmoon9538]

In March this year I came to Chennai from Oman in 737 max very fast and safe landing.,no problem..

[@moshe4227]

Boeing have thousands of thousands airplanes flying everywhere in the world, just flew with one this morning.

[@greglogan8880]

90% of my air travel is at the back of the plane for two reasons, 1st reason when I book usually those are the available seats 2nd reason that’s where me and my friends gather to drink gin & tonic and rum & soda 😂😂

[@SkyBear0509]

That plane is 15 years old , why is it boeing fault

[@surajit_Jash]

There are many Boeing Flight which are more than 20 years old and still doing great. So it can be Boeing's fault if the maintenance is done properly.

[@nfccard677]

They blaming boeing for their negligence

[@argxoxo7326]

After it was selected as the airport construction site, many Korean experts opposed it, and the basis for their opposition was very scientific and persuasive, but a local influential politician pushed ahead with the airport construction. The area has a migratory bird habitat that is very large even by global standards. After the airport was completed, it was not permitted to operate international flights until recently. Although it was permitted to operate international flights in December 2024, it was the result of politicians from local political parties pushing ahead. A major disaster occurred 21 days after the international flight permit was issued. It is an airport that was built solely for political interests and election purposes, ignoring aviation experts and scientific evidence. It is the worst airport that runs a huge deficit every year and cannot be operated without subsidies from the central government....

[@Asheroyal12]

Why all of a sudden it’s always Boeings fault? Aviation 101 keywords Human Factors.

[@grdainylung5216]

Because Boeing kills

[@KH-yv2dm]

You build your own plane, I guess

[@JulioHernandez-gw2bp]

I dont think its Boeing’s fault.

[@1mikon]

The airlines make so much money from passengers but they do not follow safety rules.

[@nelsontan8178]

boeing again...if people are afraid of these planes failing...then airlines should start posting what type of plane is used on a specific flight...people can make a choice then...

[@jxpat]

They already list this information. I always fly Airbus. Most quality airlines show the plane type and manufacturer during ticket purchase.

[@Acemechanicalservices]

Have you ever booked a flight before?

[@elvato7418]

@@jxpatdid you know airbus buys there parts from Boeing

[@bial3436]

They do. At least the airline I fly with does. Not been flying Boeing for the last few years

[@jmy6050]

I think this has very little to do with it being a Boeing. A bird strike can occur on any aircraft. Stop this Boeing blame game.

[@paulnoguera2110]

It is always Boeing never Airbus. Coincidence? I don’t think so

[@mookingbird]

Gotta change my flights now. No way I’m flying boeing

i dont like boeing, but this is not the planes fault. After the bird strike the plane made a good landing and had the runway been longer the crash would not happen. The plane from azerbaijan was not a boeing nor was the plabne from Canada that slid of the runway. The only time boeing can be blamed is for the KLM Royal Dutch Airlines plane that slid of the runway in Norway.

[@TKX18]

Blame Boeing for having a concrete wall ?

[@syedmoon9538]

A flight journey depends on the pilots but not on the aircraft company remember Scholars

[@sierraromeomike]

This is not a Boeing problem

[@syedmoon9538]

I don't agree with anyone saying bad things about the Boeing company...This plane crash was definitely due to pilot error

[@segirinyahenry8553]

How sure are you that it was the pilot who caused the accident?

[@alexlo7708]

The last row seat got 5 star N crash.

[@erkanozdogan4765]

"If it is a Boeing, I am not going."

[@crwmdp9]

This is not a Boeing issue. This is a major F-up by the crew!

[@szvqorwnpstahskypfwmp9821]

How do you know for sure?

[@biceps2007]

It's just a possibility. But people with no knowledge are quick to conclude.

[@58biggles]

It certainly looks that way

[@andrewlim7751]

12 major crashes for 737-800 including this one killing all passengers and crew except 2.

[@58biggles]

@@andrewlim7751 considering there are about 4,500 in service that's not bad and many have been due to human factors as l suspect this one is

[@Raez_XL]

When shareholder profit > safety measures

[@edem7087]

I think that the statistics about airline travel are misleading. Overall, there are fewer deaths (that is in terms of pure numbers and percentages) from airplane crashes than there are from vehicle crashes. However, I think that the crash fatality rate (that is, the number of people that die when there is a crash event) is much higher in airplane crashes compared with vehicle crashes. To put it simply, you are more likely to have an accident but less likely to die in the event of an accident when you drive a vehicle as compared to when you fly in an airplane. Which makes perfect sense because if something goes wrong, flight is much riskier than travelling by land or sea. So companies like Boeing should never have been allowed to prioritize profits over safety.

[@petersmith2040]

I agree with you 110%. I myself and several other people that I have known personally have been in vehicular crashes and all of us have survived the various crashes that span several decades. Only one was seriously injured and required hospitalization and he is still living today already in his 80s. However, I have never known anyone personally who was involved in a plane crash.

[@SH_space]

This is actually incorrect - based on the NTSB's definition of an "accident", they found that about 95% of all passengers involved in an aviation accident from 1983-2000 survived. (www.ntsb.gov/safety/data/Pages/Part121AccidentSurvivability.aspx)

[@macmacaguilar1749]

thata why cabin crew usually positioned at the back of the airplane

[@DLWELD]

Insane to have a solid concrete wall at the end of the runway - good airports have a "run off area" with loose gravel to slow the plane down - or even have overrun cables like on an aircraft carrier - but a solid wall???? It was the wall that killed all those people.

[@noelhaynes119]

Its the wall i ask my self why a wall is there a wall wtf a wall doing there

[@DEEYANASE]

O I N K… only in korea

[@whereisjustice5112]

Now China made Plane is mor advance and safest.

[@harmonsalmon7739]

Boeing has been compromised and even the cats and dogs knew this.

[@KumarKumar-fc2gc]

Well, as per your logic...Boeing should convert all its planes into Cargo planes except the last two rows for 12 passengers for better safety

[@kashimoorthymoorthy4695]

It is really difficult whether pilots error poor whether conditions suddenly occur in the mid way or poor maintenance and if you are destined to die accident will happen

[@salvadorambasa9814]

The wall is criminal absolutely 😢

[@PsyQoBoy]

It's a 2.8km runway the plane also landed short without much runway before the tarmac ended. If the pilot used atleast 40% of the runway it wouldn't have happened.

[@ClarencegHamm]

Most likely yes

[@cate9882]

Been flighing with ryanair in my teen years since 20 years because ,cheap and safe.

[@mydad156]

What is this? A passenger plane of budget South Korean airline Jeju Air faced a landing gear failure shortly after take-off on Monday. This comes a day after a plane of the same airline crashed upon landing due to landing gear issue, resulting in the death of 179 people. On Monday morning, Jeju Air flight 7C101, bound for Jeju, took off from the Gimpo Airport in Seoul but experienced a malfunction soon after. The plane returned to Gimpo where it landed safely, news agency Reuters reported. The specific nature of the problem is yet to be known. On Sunday, December 29, a Jeju Air plane with 181 people onboard crashed upon landing at Muan International Airport, marking the deadliest aviation disaster in South Korea since 1997. Only two people reportedly survived the crash.

[@KumarKumar-fc2gc]

But it is an American product. We need to give it more chances. Before 80-90 crashes, we should not panic. if you do not buy, then sanctions ...

[@Sugbofood]

They have to make airplane that all seat is in the back. That will be the safest plane in existing.

[@Ahoooooooo]

🤔

[@zintun3575]

I prefer Airbus over boeing but more importantly I would avoid budget airline like a plaque. Not really cheap if you need to put your life on the line.

[@inception6657]

I agree. Not flying in this flying coffin ⚰️.

[@RobNeir]

They understand the gravity at boeing, but they don't understand gravity...

[@manoranjanraj1382]

It's a 15 year old jet. How could manufacturer become responsible for these kind of incident.

[@kenjiterada2223]

This is what happens when you don't pick your pilots based on DEI standards. Irrespective of competency, 50% of all pilots should be women or gay or trans.

[@CompositesNG]

Pilot Error and bad Runway Design. This isn’t a Boeing issue for once.

[@Rb-y1o]

Boeing understanding the gravity of passenger airlines and the gravity doesn't care about human error... 🤔

[@JongaTim]

We all know what is happening or going around Boeing, but this is different that plane hit a wall. Don't try to change the topic.

[@delmarrey9077]

It looked like pilot error to me. The wrong way on the runway for one.

[@gosh1495]

It’s Boeing , their DEI has destroyed their entire engineering team , This plane did belly landing

[@arz3176]

Boeing strikes again how many people have to die for this cheap company?

[@Ebahandle]

This has nothing to do with the plane makers yet.

[@TheRealWindlePoons]

More to do with the concrete wall, I'd say. It is unusual to have such a high death toll when an aircraft has actually landed in one piece on a runway, even with the flaps and landing gear up.

[@ghotridr9550]

W*f is this now? The crashed airplane is Boeing 737-NG which had been flying around for a while now, without any issues. STOP THIS THING AGAINST BOEING.

[@ginebrasanmiguel1445]

That emergency landing was almost safe until that WALL🤔🤔🤔

[@hindhtvaterrorism4559]

Those Boeing flying coffins are too dangerous indeed.

[@Embargoman]

American Airlines also flies Boeing.

[@Komenya0905]

This is simply silly. So which airplanes are passengers going to use because a big percentage of planes flying are Boeing planes. Air travel may as well cease then.

[@csw8750]

I bet they are gonna start putting First Class at the rear of the planes

[@Getthefukouttahere]

At the end of all runways should be foam or other material to absorb impacts. Concrete walls make no sense!

[@makedredd299]

If you’re dying, then fly Boeing.

[@kartikman7859]

then dont fly.. stay home ...

[@Redmi-xu1yo]

stay in yEenDia fix the toilet 🚽🪠

[@Sugbofood]

You still die if the airplane will struck your home. Its Same die

[@Redmi-xu1yo]

@@Sugbofood where is the place

[@andrewwmacfadyen6958]

Flight deck crew handled an emergency situation bady

[@erkanozdogan4765]

First Class section will be moved to the back of the aircraft.

[@Firrosea]

😂

[@iroc341]

This is crazy. people making all kinds of ridiculous accusations. We'll wait for the Box's.

[@ishagbashir318]

If it is the boeing, then I'm not going.

[@jjjjjjjjjjjjkjjj]

Might want to redesign the plane so engine smoke doesn't go into the aircraft

[@Okay-h7n]

Why always pointing to Boeing its an old aircraft meaning it’s companies repsonsibilities and maintenance not boeing fault. Please dont always put as Boeing