Person who decided to put concrete wall at the end of runway needs to be put in jail.
@lewblythin3 күн бұрын
in the old days we had a net to stop the plane
@pushslice3 күн бұрын
Can almost guarantee there were many underlings who thought it was a bad idea, but carried out the boss’s directions anyway… 🤷 🇰🇷 🧠
@pillred59743 күн бұрын
It looked like it hit a mound of earth to me.
@kenmay15723 күн бұрын
Does seem to be a construction disaster
@Michm-b4m3 күн бұрын
The airport was created by the opposition party who aimed to get the votes in their regular territory in Joella province. There are lots of suspicions surrounding this crash. 1 the informant video was filmed right on time and at the roof broadcasted by MBC. The initial informant was a reporter of MBC then changed to others multiple times. MBC broadcasted a weird screen which is allegedly related to directives of North Korea such as impeachment 817. 817 refers to North Korea's espionage directives or Chinese bird looking drone, ch 817. Lots of suspicions hovering around in South Korea. Media outlets which are pro China and pro Democrats continue focusing on bird strikes and try to make this incident responsible for jeju air only rather than Muan airport which was planned by Democrats and reopened for international flights only 21 days ago right after president Yoon got impeached. The constitutional trial of the impeachment has not yet done though majority seats of Democrats passed the impeachment bill by themselves.
@Zippy-p4d3 күн бұрын
Only thing that I'm confused about is what genius thought of building a great big brick wall on the runway..
@scotfree213 күн бұрын
Some say it was the bird strike that doomed the aircraft. Some say it was down to no landing gear. Looking at the video I would say sliding at 200 miles an hour into a brick wall at the end of the runway probably played a big part in its destruction.
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
Indeed. The plane was intact when it touched down on the runway. It was the violent impact with a cement wall that made it fatal.
@arsenalroo2 күн бұрын
We don't know f all yet. I'm guessing get down fast is smoke. kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZombgJminsqFhbc
@chichichiyomi__18 сағат бұрын
Its a concrete berm, more like an embankment. Aviation equipment are mounted on concrete foundations raised a few feet off the ground. And surrounding that is a pile of dirt to cover the concrete. Its not a brick wall, a brick wall would have crumbled under the speed and weight of the plane. Also while the berm was indeed a big part of the crash, air crashes are usually a larger series of problems that happened. Solely blaming the wall is insufficient for a full investigation. It could be argued that had the plane was properly configured for landing and it landed in the right place down the runway, it might have stopped before the berm. This is not to say that the berm was not a fatal design flaw.
@scotfree2118 сағат бұрын
@ I despair. Quite obviously I don’t mean an actual brick wall. The point I’m making is without a solid object positioned at the end of the runway we probably wouldn’t be talking about the deaths of 179 people DUAAA
@derekvanbloemen84153 күн бұрын
No mention of the concrete wall at the end of the runway causing all the deaths. Incredible.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
It was a long way from the end of the runway, Maybe he should have landed at the Start NOT at THE END of it lol T F the concrete was there.
@alanstevens1296Күн бұрын
It wasn't "at the end of the runway." If the plane hadn't been going 150 mph on the ground 800 feet after the end of the runway all those people could have walked away from that plane. At that speed it would go another 800+ feet and almost certainly crash into something else along the way. Building, wall, storage tanks, embankment, ditch, waterway, highway, tractor-trailer, train, retaining wall, are some of the possibilities at airports.
@derekvanbloemen8415Күн бұрын
@@alanstevens1296no. The plane started to land in the last third of the runway. The airport was stupidly built in the middle of a migratory bird area. Any runways close to buildings, embankments, storage tanks etc doesn’t make sense. Those passengers were killed by the plane smashing into the embankment, concrete or earthen. The pilots needed some quick thinking and from experience in the Far East that Orientals think differently. Also, control tower miscommunication
@alanstevens1296Күн бұрын
@@derekvanbloemen8415 The berm is about 200 feet from the airport perimeter wall which is made of concrete. This means: 1) The airport had very limited property available to build on 2) The alternative was no airport for Muan 3) If it missed the berm the plane would have hit the perimeter wall at 150 mph with the same results. No survivors or only a few.
@alanstevens1296Күн бұрын
@@derekvanbloemen8415 Did you know that at Washington National Airport 1) The main runway (about 7,000 feet) has only about 800 feet of overrun available at either end before the Potomac River 2) The two shorter runways (about 5,000 and 3,700 feet respectively) have much less than that 3) One of the busiest and most important airports in the country with about 800 flights per day 4) Per my research, only one overrun accident there. The Northwest Airlines crash on December 1, 1983, was a low-speed overrun. The aircraft skidded off the runway during a snowstorm and ended up in the Potomac River, but because the speed was relatively low, there were no fatalities, and all passengers and crew survived.
@edwardfreeman75123 күн бұрын
Bird strikes don't usually cause catastrophic crashes. If they did nobody would fly. It looks like major pilot errors to me.
@Mewsfinder3 күн бұрын
The massive concrete wall made it catastrophic - Otherwise it wouldn’t have been as bad. Nowhere near -
@ukmaxi3 күн бұрын
No, but a birdstrike did indeed occur and this was the catalyst at least.
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
@@ukmaxi A birdstrike started it, but it was a cement wall that made it fatal.
@AnotherPointOfView9443 күн бұрын
Wait until the facts are revealed from the FDR and VR.
@skincareforme2 күн бұрын
@@davidford3115 what abt the gears? they couldve breaked and never crash into the embankment
@jules2633 күн бұрын
South Korean government allowed a concrete wall of death to be built at the end of a short runway, the plane had landed and many passengers could have possibly survived if it wasn’t for that wall.
@celinaastbury46193 күн бұрын
not to be that guy but jejus east-west runway is 4k long and the north-south is 3km long which are industry standard, not short
@alanstevens1296Күн бұрын
It wasn't "at the end of the runway." If the plane hadn't been going 150 mph on the ground 800 feet after the end of the runway all those people could have walked away from that plane. At that speed it would go another 800+ feet and almost certainly crash into something else along the way. Building, wall, storage tanks, embankment, ditch, waterway, highway, tractor-trailer, train, retaining wall, are some of the possibilities at airports.
@Bungle-UK3 күн бұрын
Dodgy pilots. Some terrible decision making seems to have been in play.
@geofo603 күн бұрын
They were both very experienced, with thousands of air miles flown without any bad outcomes.
@Bungle-UK3 күн бұрын
@ not this time
@kerriganwild29963 күн бұрын
If that's true why wasn't the gear down then?
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
He was relying Luck, But it run out lol.
@Saijai1433 күн бұрын
That plane disintegrated when hitting that cement wall. Its amazing the flight recorder was intact at all.
@juliawigger97963 күн бұрын
Black boxes are in the back of aircraft.
@compulsiverambler13523 күн бұрын
Flight data recorder casings are the toughest piece of equipment in a modern commercial jet aeroplane. I wouldn't be surprised if it dented the concrete wall.
@gazs72373 күн бұрын
Flight recorders could survive pretty much anything you can throw at it, including direct missile hits. The concrete wall may as well be jelly
@molybdomancer1953 күн бұрын
The flight recorders of Air France 447 were recovered from the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean (nearly 4,000 metres down -similar to the depth of the Titanic) two years after the plane hit the sea. They were able to recover data from both boxes. The black boxes are made to be almost indestructible
@TheGalantir3 күн бұрын
Yeah, isn't it amazing how something which is designed to survive a crash survives a crash. Crazy.
@Boobyi19533 күн бұрын
Unconfirmed but some sources say 2 survivors and they are cabin crew. At the tail of the Boeing are two seats facing towards the tail with lap and shoulder harnesses.
@geofo603 күн бұрын
On the Boeing 737-800 those two seats at the rear, face to the back. That's possibly what contributed to them surviving the crash. Better to wait for the final outcome of the investigation before we jump to the wrong conclusion.
@chrisclark41123 күн бұрын
Yh dats Wot he said
@SquirreIwood3 күн бұрын
Couple questions: 1. Why hasn’t there been any innovation to prevent birds from entering into the engine? 2. In the world where everything seems to be automatically uploaded into the cloud, why do we still need to track down and hunt for black boxes and voice recorders for such valuable information?
@dainagrn70303 күн бұрын
How before they never talked about birds? Only the last week birds became the biggest cause of everything.
@ura93903 күн бұрын
1) an engine is designed to ingest huge quantities of air to power the combustion of fuel, you cannot cover the inlets to prevent birds from entering without impeding the airflow and basically rendering the engine ineffective or hugely inefficient and easy to stall 2) data transmission relies on satellite communication which is not always reliable and can be patchy, air to ground data communication works only over the ground not the ocean, cloud cover and adverse weather can also hamper communications, a robust data recorder designed to survive crashes is a far superior method to constantly collect and store data
@Bungle-UK3 күн бұрын
A device covering the engines would be too disruptive to airflow, and increase weight.
@YUDNSAY3 күн бұрын
Did they not manage to develop a method for concord air intake?
@RPaton3 күн бұрын
@@YUDNSAY no
@dmthandmade56743 күн бұрын
I haven't studied these things and as such am not an 'expert'. That said, in my laymans opinion, airport runways are always better if they don't have a bloomin' great brick wall in the middle of them, for some reason. Brick walls are well known in some circles to be really rather bad for the structural integrity ofany kind of vehicle moving quickly towards them and the wellbeing of passengers and crew on board.. I would suggest, in all humility befitting my status as a lowly non expert, that not having a brick wall would have been better.
@sahara-nadine3 күн бұрын
That ^ part exactly. Baffling to have a concrete cemented wall in the midst of a runway. Whoa! Most airports tend to have a fence and not a brick wall, because a plane can easily go through a fence without exploding, also these fences are placed far away from the runway as a way to close off the airport area.
@edwardfreeman75122 күн бұрын
Yeah it should surely have been a fence. If planes overrun the fences help the plane to slow down without a sudden violent impact.
@AnotherPointOfView9442 күн бұрын
The wall was 250 metres BEYOND the end of the runway.
@skincareforme2 күн бұрын
even if there wasnt the wall it would have still been catastrophic given the speed they were going the ocean is like cement as well
@tombox27593 күн бұрын
Flying may be statistically safer but not based on survival rates per accident. On average, there are 3,287 car deaths per day internationally. More than 94% of all vehicle accident deaths are caused by user error. Road traffic crashes remain the leading killer of children and youth aged 5-29 years. One person is killed every 26 seconds on average due to road traffic injuries. Would you rather drive or fly?
@pooooornopigeon3 күн бұрын
You are more likely to die in a car crash on the way to the airport, plane crashes are rare.
@evaluateanalysis79743 күн бұрын
"Road traffic crashes remain the leading killer of children and youth aged 5-29 years" Not in the USA, it is of course *guns* . In the USA they care more about guns than their own children. (I'm not sure about the upper age limit.)
@michaelmyers72903 күн бұрын
Drive because it involves being in contact with the ground..
@NonsenseFabricator2 күн бұрын
In terms of fatalities per mile travelled per person, aircraft are orders of magnitude safer. We just don't think as much about car crash victims.
@sallylemon58353 күн бұрын
News like this made me not flying for years
@pooooornopigeon3 күн бұрын
What a cowardly approach to life, it means you are existing but not living.
@evaluateanalysis79743 күн бұрын
"News..." You'd better stop driving too then, because that is more dangerous.
@Dliu1116Күн бұрын
Foolish mentality, flying is far more safer than driving. Can’t live life in paranoia and fear of death, that’s good as being dead.
@A2Z1Two33 күн бұрын
What a fidgety presenter , playing with her hair, clawing at her neck , very unprofessional and distracting . She should keep her hands OFF camera 😢
@geoffshaw80533 күн бұрын
The pilots must have just forgot to put the gear down in the confusuon.
@PeterEich-gl1gh3 күн бұрын
Is this the only possible explanation?
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Forgot to engage BRAIN more like.
@nino888812 күн бұрын
This is really sad. There were full families those were completely gone bc of this accident. RIP 🙏
@lynnschaeferle-zh4go3 күн бұрын
How long will this story continue to be milked bf the report is done? 1.) landing was perfect, despite mechanical failure 2.) there was a concrete wall at the end of the runway Sometimes things really are simple
@Robinbamv3 күн бұрын
How do you know there was a mechanical problem with the landing gear ?
@Marilyn-s4d3 күн бұрын
💯 correct!😮
@alanstevens1296Күн бұрын
No landing gear? Still going 150 mph as it approached the perimeter of the airport? Not "perfect" -- a non-survivable situation.
@yramnatogada4493 күн бұрын
Rest in peace 🥰🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@quarstrongforce3 күн бұрын
the wall was(was) on the begining of the run way, polit attempttedland on the opposite direction. landed at the middle of the runway(1200/2500). Do jet have a pilot light?
@kevinallen42183 күн бұрын
What does a bird strike have to do with the under carage not coming down 🤔.. this was deliberate in my view
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
Deliberate attempt at suicide? If the hydraulics were damaged, that would prevent proper deployment, and it lost of power meant time was a limiting factor, they might not have had enough time to manually deploy.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Bird brain Pilot me thinks,
@davidford31152 күн бұрын
@@brianwebb191 Do you have anything better to do than lob insults at a dead man? It is easy to attack someone who can no longer defend themselves.
@sircxx86213 күн бұрын
‘Bird strike’. Yea, ok, lads.
@vanphunguyen17223 күн бұрын
Unusual thinking people 🤔 Built the wall at the end runways to stop the Planes run over the road
@frankblangeard88653 күн бұрын
"We don't know". That pretty much sums up this video.
@garysimpson39003 күн бұрын
The KZbin Channel Blancolario presented by Juan Browne has the best coverage to date of the issues raised by this crash.
@happyhalfwit88623 күн бұрын
I have a suspicion as to what happened. Bird strike cause engine fire/failure/shut down and rather than take their time crew rushed the drill. I suspect that all the associated warnings and cautions were not cancelled as the shut down was carried out and post shut down and that they rushed the landing and forgot to select gear down and the warnings drowned out the gear warning. Why the "to low gear " was ignored I don't know but stress causes strange things and have seen similar in training flights in the simulator. It looked like an almost perfect landing just not with gear in place and once they touched it was too late or possibly they applied power to try and go around hence the length of travel at the end. I suspect the DFDR will yield the answers fairly quickly.
@johncale71393 күн бұрын
Were the engines in reverse to help with the slowing down
@jim.franklin3 күн бұрын
Speculation is unhelpful. Airtravel is still the safest way to travel in human history - oddly enough, even safer than walking when you run the data. Something happened on the plane that resulted in the aircrew needing to get that plane on the ground fast, between the mayday and the accident was around 6 monutes, not sufficient for all the check lists they would need to land normally, let alone in an emergency, so it must have been serious. All we can and should do, is wait for the Official Interim Report, as John Stickland said, this could take several months due to the state of the airframe, then wait for the Final Report - however long that may take - potentially a couple of years - and simply hope that the industry is able to glean lessons from what happened to improve air safety even more than it already is. Be very careful about some of the videos circulating on social media, some are full of the brown stuff - those done by actual airline pilots are the ones to listen - they do not speculate per se.
@andrewhotston9833 күн бұрын
If your data says flying is safer than walking, you're doing the statistics wrong!
@jim.franklin3 күн бұрын
@@andrewhotston983 You have to take into account all injuries sustained by each mode of transport per head of population. Around the world - about 300,000 people die each year walking - and then there are the other injuries sustained - regardless of the cause - that number is about the total in civil aircrashes.
@cyberfunk37933 күн бұрын
@@jim.franklin You compared by km travelled rather than time spent travelling? How about compare h spent travelling, so account for all the time a person is standing up during their life time and compare it to the frequency of deadly accidents per h while flying.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Maybe they where late for Tea ????????
@Graham-zh4cp3 күн бұрын
Birdstrike no way wat was it a flock of eagles !
@daleashman4343 күн бұрын
Needed to see this right before my flight … 😢
@Gvsvillages3 күн бұрын
Heartbreaking.
@dalerollinson2 күн бұрын
Pilot should've attempted a sea landing rather than 'risk' landing on that runway without gear
@orlandocfi3 күн бұрын
This flight is scheduled as an overnight flight from BKK. Perhaps pilot fatigue played a role in the tragic outcome of this emergency. RIP to all who perished.
@Sue-p3w3 күн бұрын
R.I.P. Extremely sad.
@glynbirchall91463 күн бұрын
Sad they usually happen in 3s.Igot away with it on a prop plane on way to guernsey .It was all over the sky .Scarey .
@ruthfrank81063 күн бұрын
There was a crash in Canada yesterday
@kt3076Күн бұрын
Why are they focused on a bird strike when a cement wall caused the damage? who approve the concrete wall should be jailed...
@brentwestbrook3 күн бұрын
Reducing aviation incidents is an issue to be addressed by Labour by taxing it even further. Yep, that'll fix it.
Was there also a wall if they had landed the way they came in ( or was there ANY runwzy with no wall ?)
@chrisclark41123 күн бұрын
Oooo , int that weird , there's been about 5 failed landing gear accidents 😂😂😂
@oreilly12378783 күн бұрын
The crew couldnt lower the landing gear.Why?Was it mechanical failure.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Pilot Failure For Sure.
@mangagoybislig6223 күн бұрын
Why NTSB is always reactive, these could have not ended a tragic crash(why there was a berm). Just like the massive container ship 🚢 that struck the bridge( no dolphins 🐬)
@garycope48303 күн бұрын
Bird strike ? Yea sure !
@keeksputels18513 күн бұрын
Either pilots fault, or manufactuers fault. Bird strike smells like pure bs
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
I believe the birdstrike started the series of events. But that cement wall at the end of the runway was what brought it to a fatal conclusion.
@makedredd2992 күн бұрын
Why?
@jebsmoak75053 күн бұрын
It was coming in fast short idk what?
@dennishill40983 күн бұрын
So we don't know click bate
@DeniseSterling-e1i3 күн бұрын
Sorry 😔😐😔 for the loss ❤❤🤔🤯🧐🤨🤔❤️❤️💯😇🌍🙏.
@SrimanArcharyaJBC3 күн бұрын
The Universes Prathistha can nearly be measured. After I carefully added the variables to the Universe. The Sums of Atar seem to be changing to a certain range both in alphabet and numbers. Meaning that data in numbers and alphabet can be consolidated to pin point these types of occurrences to predict random things like this and other things. It’s a safety requirement to have control of the Universe as My Heritage and bloodline lineage as MahaRanaKhumbha. I will commence the paperwork for my Crowning as Khumbar Prajapati with the evidence. ⚡️🤴🏽🕉🔺➕
@YUDNSAY3 күн бұрын
Speculation again TR?
@IrfanAli-qp1gm3 күн бұрын
Boeing Plane Crash Investigation Dept must be the biggest Division of Boeing. At least this expert didn't say the plane veered like other idiot experts have said when anyone can see that plane went straight down the runway.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Goes to show you cannot Steer without Wheels lol
@reeva57353 күн бұрын
Even tragic stories have a beginning, a middle and ending. We know how this ended but questioning the wall is not the answer..Experts MUST go back to the beginning of where this all began with the faulty mechanics of the landing gear! And since everybody else is speculating... the "bird strike" puff of smoke was more likely an electrical fault on board, caused by desperate attempts to fix the landing gear!! But we will see.
@evaluateanalysis79743 күн бұрын
"this all began with the faulty mechanics of the landing gear" Fascinating, no doubt you have evidence for this. Or perhaps not?
@reeva57353 күн бұрын
@evaluateanalysis7974 OR perhaps I am well aware of the fact that this supposed "bird strike" occurred on a landing approach.... at which point, the landing gear would be deployed already. Any MAYDAY would have surely mentioned that the wheels were jammed.
@evaluateanalysis79743 күн бұрын
@reeva5735 "at which point, the landing gear would be deployed already. " So what's with landing gear problems? "MAYDAY" They generally don't.
@reeva57353 күн бұрын
@evaluateanalysis7974 "So what's with landing gear problems"... no wheels, no brakes!
@evaluateanalysis79743 күн бұрын
@reeva5735 Lol! You said "faulty mechanics of the landing gear" then "landing gear would be deployed already" then "no wheels". You're just trolling.
@quarstrongforce3 күн бұрын
flame out. bad design
@bobthebuilder5728-v3w3 күн бұрын
Is this yet another Boeing plane 🤔
@Getonwithit2043 күн бұрын
Here we go. 🙄
@DIGITALMARKETINGGURUS-xm3ix3 күн бұрын
Boeing needs to be investigated
@MarkSiosal3 күн бұрын
Yup. I mean, why did the plane disintegrate when it hit a concrete wall? An Airbus would've bounced off and everyone would be a ok.
@DIGITALMARKETINGGURUS-xm3ix3 күн бұрын
@MarkSiosal how many Boeing incidents vs how many airbus?
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Yes they do lol Make sure the pilot has F=====g Brain.
@marcvincentl27473 күн бұрын
if its already the second try to land, the pilot should have reconsider water ditch given that he know that landing gears are not working and engine failure. He should have know the Runway limitation given the situation.
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
If not for the wall, they could have slid 1.08KM on the ground before the vehicle would have ended up in the bay. At that point it would have been like the Miracle on the Hudson.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
I would not trust that pilot with a Weelbarrow lol.
@robertbate57903 күн бұрын
♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏🇬🇧
@DandyE44A3 күн бұрын
I am not an aviation expert. As far as I know Asians they are way too much about rules, instructions, traditions etc. They simply panic and they don't know how to react to a stressful and unexpected situation which is not described in their instructions. These Korean pilots encountered a minor problem (the bird strike) and they instantly took the decision to die instead of thinking fast, improvising and finding a solution of the situation.
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
Yeah, and we are just going to ignore the cement wall a mere 150 meters from the end of the runway? Had that not been there, the plane could have slid another 1.08KM until it entered the Bay.
@DandyE44A3 күн бұрын
@ One said there were a kind of hotel on the way of the sliding plane. So this concrete wall safe these people’s lives at least.
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
@@DandyE44A NO, it did not. That hotel you mentioned is 700 meters from the end of the runway while that wall was a mere 150 meters. Further, that hotel isn't even on the slide path of the plane as it is off to the side. From the centerline of the runway, there was a clear 1.08KM line to the bay. At that point, the water would have resulted in a situation similar to the miracle on the Hudson River.
@brianwebb1912 күн бұрын
Maybe he felt sorry for the birds lol, and thought he would end it ?? he did a good job though 200 MPH into Concrete, Concrete WON , The runway is ok seems he did not want to use it for some reason lol
@DandyE44A2 күн бұрын
@@brianwebb191 Many experienced pilots say that it’s the electronic which flies planes nowadays and all what today’s pilots are trained for is pushing knobs. I am ready to bet that these particular crew simply panicked because of the unusual situation in which they found themselves and were poorly prepared for.
@Anson-g5w3 күн бұрын
The pilot is not good
@davidford31153 күн бұрын
That landing aside from not having landing gear was practically perfect. It was the cement wall a mere 150 meters from the end of the runway that turned it into a deadly crash.