【堅離地政經】一片簡述特朗普「封口費」案，及對大選影響：34項罪名全部成立 Trump要坐監嗎? 將如何影響美國大選? (馮智政)

Рет қаралды 56,566

Күн бұрын

美國前總統 #特朗普 (Donald Trump) 在「#封口費」刑事案中被控的34項偽造商業紀錄罪。12名陪審員經過兩天商議後達成一致裁決，全部成立。案情指在2016年大選前不久，特朗普律師Michael Cohen向成人電影女星Stormy Daniels支付了13萬美元封口費，並以不當商業紀錄支付了這筆費用。特朗普是美國第一位被判有罪的總統，也是第一位成為重罪犯的主要政黨推定提名人。#美國大選
今集主持 #馮智政
_______________________________________________
👉 成為這個頻道的會員並獲得獎勵：
/ @simonglobal
Simon 沈旭暉堅離地 Social Media ▶
⏺ Patreon: / simonshen
⏹ Website: thesimonglocal...
🔼 Facebook: / shensimon
ℹ️ Instagram: / simon.diplomacy
➡️ Twitter: / simon_diplomacy
其他合作及查詢可以電郵至 simonpatreon@gmail.com (Alan)
Jacky 馮智政 Social Media ▶
ℹ️ Instagram: / ccfung.jacky
⏹ Website of NGO 港美教育交流協會: www.hkameea.org/
馮智政、馮敬恩及柴宇瀚均為本頻道客席主持，本頻道的主持及客席均由主持自訂題目、自主研究及編採自主的權利，各人的意見並不代表本台立場。
所有客席主持及嘉賓提供的內容，已授權本頻道作內容的管理、編輯及發佈的決策權。
影片及圖片素材來源：Envato、Wikimedia Commons、Artlist

Пікірлер: 142

@FourMan-dc1nv 3 ай бұрын

花了這麼多時間描述案情，卻不解說在結案時，法庭竟然一反常例，由被告先行結案，然後任由檢察官最後結案。為何評論漏了這最重要的一點？

@yipyip2020yip 3 ай бұрын

謝謝馮智政見解分享 ~🙏🙏

@AppleDailyFriends 3 ай бұрын

非常感謝馮同學嘅講解同分享🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻💛🍎

@AppleDailyFriends 3 ай бұрын

36:07

@davidc5438 3 ай бұрын

堅離地政經團隊好! 大家好! 早/午/晚上好!

@Petersap18 3 ай бұрын

謝謝民主黨的評論，完全不提不公平審訊

@miriamlau6177 3 ай бұрын

It‘s amazing： with all the recent talks about 公義誠信人格 it is apparant there’s another set of standard

@2qrcsj8794 3 ай бұрын

係陪審團全數決定特朗普犯罪. 並非法官. 陪審團隊係控辯兩方同意嘅人選😂😂

@DavidJohnson-wx6us 3 ай бұрын

They are required to follow the instructions/guidances of that judge when decide guity or not. Whether those instructions/guidances are fair or biased is debatable..

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

@@DavidJohnson-wx6us 原來你相信法治同人治冇分別，解釋法律條文都會偏見同歧視嘅，唔相信法律，你仲有咩可以維持公平公正？

@chinyauli4510 3 ай бұрын

@@MiddleL555川普要打感動，呢單案嘅重點應該係浪子回頭金不換😂

@cathyhui498 3 ай бұрын

紐約是深藍州，亦即大部分人是反川，再加上這種無中生有的檢控，候選的陪審員名單到底有多中立值得商榷，最後就是辯方只能反對換掉陪審員10次機會，所以最後陪審員是什麼成色根本就是個疑問。

@求生净土 3 ай бұрын

Thanks!

@Tsang7570 3 ай бұрын

Very concise summary

@janet8962 3 ай бұрын

多謝馮博士！

@zzz-sf8zk 3 ай бұрын

Good ep, detailed...

@傑亚 3 ай бұрын

多謝，多謝馮博士🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@christineto5759 3 ай бұрын

正👏👏👏

@yums.9895 3 ай бұрын

🙏🏻🙏🏻

@joanneli189 3 ай бұрын

Thenk you thank you for speaking the truth for sake of peace in the world

@StableCoin-q6z 3 ай бұрын

再選返教主嘅話, 美國人真係好難再出嚟行喎

@morris.m 3 ай бұрын

唔該晒馮sir👍

@2qrcsj8794 3 ай бұрын

Gag orders 係因為佢日日恐嚇法官證人倍審團

@stevenwu2325 3 ай бұрын

有錯誤，Trump 競選的經費主要來自super pacts。連他打官司的錢都不是自己出的。這種極度自私一毛不拔的人怎麼會用自己的錢競選？你只要查一下就知道他競選的錢是哪裡來的。美國在這方面很是透明。

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

佢哋仲信侵大把錢，唔收人工做總統，用自己錢選總統，完全唔知在任駛咗幾多保安費，用政府錢去自己開嘅渡假村渡假同開會，一佰倍佢嘅人工咁上下啦！有多冇少。

@positiveenergy4545 3 ай бұрын

佢在美都申請過多次破産啦，只係佢盲粉無細心查看佢D黑歷史

@stevenwu2325 3 ай бұрын

@@MiddleL555 好多身處香港的人根本就唔熟悉美國，實際上Trump 咁㗎垃圾可以當選，一句概括就係White nationalist 的反彈，再加強人政治的右派抬頭。我亦都係美國公民，我係絕唔會vote for這種人的。

@peteryin5151 3 ай бұрын

感謝分享❤❤ 馮先生聲靚外，外表俊美，世上難得才俊

@yk3813 3 ай бұрын

Thank you!

@e1s390 3 ай бұрын

結果特朗普因禍得福，得到大量捐款支持佢繼續

@tommylamck 3 ай бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍👍

@taifu1688 3 ай бұрын

致馮智政、都幾精采！不過、你忘記解釋一下「為什麼Michael Cohn要報復」、Donald Trump曾經如何對待他的忠誠伙記？Please read Cohn’s book - Revenge…

@miriamlau6177 3 ай бұрын

All Trump cares about is himself. Short change his contractors, rip off his employees. His donors are paying his millions of legal fees. Over charging the USGovernment for the secret service, making them stay in his hotels.

@wlee394 3 ай бұрын

講得＂絕對正確！

@taifu1688 3 ай бұрын

@@wlee394have you read the book - Revenge by Michael Cohn? Do you agree with the content?

@cheungkk7700 3 ай бұрын

Thanks

@runp2049 3 ай бұрын

謝謝馮同學嘅評論。不過，我較有趣知道這個星期香港發生嘅事，你哋會評論4 7人案嗎？

@sb8nd 3 ай бұрын

咁都唔係政治迫害我都唔知咩係😂😂😂

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

係你無知俾人呃囉!仲有咩？😂

@alexwong4224 3 ай бұрын

丅RUMP是法官要他一定要上庭不準離開，不是你說的他故意賴在庭上博煤體上镜！！！請多做功課，不要誤導！

@kitwong2034 3 ай бұрын

佢有犯法一回事，可以咁凸鑽告入又真系勁😂😂，想睇以前其他總統被人告

@tomjay4183 3 ай бұрын

小朋友太忙了不能深入最重要在於六七月間前總统能不能告上法庭如能問题就大了所以看到特朗普不在乎呢哈哈哈

@NeoMennon 3 ай бұрын

川普之所以想要上联邦法院打官司是因为联邦法院最后有可能上最高法院，他自己塞了3个法官进去。另外总统可以赦免联邦罪，虽然他是前总统，但是否有这个权力还不好说，最后会上到最高院来决定。川普的禁言令是因为他公布了法官和陪审团的个人信息包括住址，希望能给这些人施加个人压力纽约地检打这场官司的方法就是以前针对黑帮老大的打法

@求生净土 3 ай бұрын

阿弥陀佛 so knowledgeable.

@WWTam 3 ай бұрын

Is the trial fair or rig? Is the judge acting properly by ordering the defence lawyer to make statement ahead of the prosecutor and allowing the jury to return home after each hearing and before delivering the verdict. All are quite contrary to the normal law procedures. 🙄🙄🙄🙄

@brucel7430 3 ай бұрын

"Is the judge acting properly by ordering the defence lawyer to make statement ahead of the prosecutor and allowing the jury to return home after each hearing and before delivering the verdict. " It's actually how the legal proceeding works in NY, as stated in the NY court website. It's nice to remember that there are 50 jurisdictions in the US + the federal court, they don't necessary have the same procedure orders.

@wlee394 3 ай бұрын

閣下在n y c住了多久？陪審員要天天隔離在酒店？，很少發生啊！亦不是美國法律的必要正常程序。

@wanggok 3 ай бұрын

諗起彭帥精高麗，張高麗没事

@kencheung8813 3 ай бұрын

習主席說:特朗普不是我朋友止於那幅相不是很熟他

@tastree 3 ай бұрын

杜林普

@tungkiuannho8035 3 ай бұрын

多謝!

@lainomok4385 3 ай бұрын

❤❤❤👍👍👍

@eldonchoy1889 3 ай бұрын

用法律手段對付政敵，手法似曾相識

@You717on99 3 ай бұрын

其實係Biden 做得真係好差，所以上次唔鍾意Trump而投Biden嘅人今次投畀Trump，個情況都非常無奈😓 投Biden 就一定會繼續差落去，投Trump就係喺咁hopeless現況希望有所轉變… it’s a wild card that no one knows

@brucel7430 3 ай бұрын

所有經濟數據, 除咗通漲, 都顯示現在比Biden上台時好. 而Trump亦未能提出任何可以改變既實質方案. 問題係, 實際情況同大眾認知有差距. 最近民調顯示, 55%人認為經濟收縮今, 56%認為美國經濟處於衰退期,49%認為上一年S&P 500係跌咗, 但明顯S&P 500 23年升咗24%, 今年升咗12%. 49%認為失業率係50年新高, 但卻依然係4%以下.

@You717on99 3 ай бұрын

@@brucel7430 當你出街驚畀人跟返屋企，行街怕遇到零元購，去食飯擔心停車架車被人打爆玻璃，成街隱君子，治安二十年來最差，這就是真實情況！ Trump 時期，我怕亞洲人被歧視，Biden 現況我直情出街怕會死囉！ THIS IS THE REALITY! And to be honest, it was Trumps govt that put the bet on the right Covid vaccine companies, not Biden. It was Trump govt that introduced the tax cut, not Biden. Don’t forget that there’s always a delay effect. The fruits you are seeing now could very well be planted by the person before!

@brucel7430 3 ай бұрын

@@You717on99 而我不知道, 原來地方治安係應該由聯邦負責囉. No doubt, Trump government had put the right bet on COVID vaccine, but his handling of the pandemic is terrible over all, remember those Bob Woodward recordings? You mean the tax cut that benefits mostly the rich, and causing the country $2.5 trillion more debts? You could argue that we have the economic today because of Trump, you could also argue that we have the inflation today because Trump too. You know, there is always a delay effect.

@willialuke 3 ай бұрын

馮同學需要做得D資料搜索，敘述有啲誤導性，個禁言令只是禁止特郎普語言抹黑某陪審團員和法庭職員，普非禁止他說案件，其實在審訊期間，特郎普每天都在語言攻擊個法官。

@dorisli5691 3 ай бұрын

講者需要再找更多的資料才作分析，美國有很多不同的法官及法律學者在這件事曾作深層的詳細剖析，因為今次的內容確有誤導的成份。

@NAMVANC 3 ай бұрын

Gag order 其實被法官常用。同意以上评論。

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

主要佢認為案件沒重要意義，現代人覺得政治人物再唔需要有誠信，睇侵定罪後捐款大增就知，真係 game changer 。

@tmty-9h 3 ай бұрын

我在美國，一定vote Trump 🎉🎉nothing but Trump😅

@dtsai1584 3 ай бұрын

👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏

@mwgor 3 ай бұрын

Great explanation of the Trump guilty verdict.

@marcoliverpool 3 ай бұрын

政治檢控！

@alexwong4224 3 ай бұрын

聽一下原是自由黨人，現在的第三個總統候選人Kennedy,他如何評價，kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5mwiIGua9eChKssi=81pQ3Je9EtVhwcF2

@yatsunchau3371 3 ай бұрын

馮生你講得非常之好，旦係有些法官處理不當支持你無講，睇完全文之後，其實你主要目的就是叫人支持這位女副總統，失望。吾好走劉生條路，在佢未出權叔本書前我己睇到這人，所以之後我己無聽佢喇！

@pebblewaffle4223 3 ай бұрын

謝謝馮同學！參考一下： Blanche= 讀> 博朗ch

@Feu7331 3 ай бұрын

咁奇怪，叫雞就自己比錢唔會落單啦。

@dyuen9780 3 ай бұрын

@106CHAR 3 ай бұрын

衰在出公數

@ahgongchiu2213 3 ай бұрын

FBiden

@honest8226 3 ай бұрын

馮同學個髮型同Trump有啲似喎！

@jasonsccheung3831 3 ай бұрын

佢已經話會上訴，安排上訴應該趕唔到11月前。聽親共和黨律師嘅講法，上訴駁斥理由將會係：呢個係criminal case, 呢啲掩口費並無掩蓋任何criminal activities，所以係no case。民調直到呢一刻，最大5個搖擺州，佢仍然領先，無影響。

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

原來你完全唔知控罪，其中係話佢偽做文件去掩飾佢俾揞口費，偽造文書係商業詐騙罪喎，老兄。

@jasonsccheung3831 3 ай бұрын

@@MiddleL555 掩蓋文件係刑事，但佢掩蓋嘅嘢係無刑事成份在內。你唔明白人哋講乜嘢就睇清楚啲。亦無話佢有機會推翻到判決。只係話在眾多訪問中，有共和黨派律師建議用以上理由去上訴。

@positiveenergy4545 3 ай бұрын

一個誠信破産狂妄自大口出狂言分化國民更唯恐天下不乱的咸濕老嘢唔該返歸啦。美國政壇需要年青新血。

@jasonsccheung3831 3 ай бұрын

@@positiveenergy4545 拜登貴庚？

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

@@jasonsccheung3831 無論掩蓋乜野，偽造文件已經係刑事，理得你點解咁做，點解咁做只係減型理由明白未？

@TheDjerkovic 3 ай бұрын

Well thanks for being the remaining major HK diaspora channel that hasn't completely joined the Maga AlternativeFacts Universe. In all the pro-Trump discourse there seems to be no real pushback on his actual guilt but the focus is rather casting aspersions on the motivation of the state DA. Also alot of mis/disinformation about federal vs state jurisdiction and the independence of DOJ or SDNY.

@richball4156 3 ай бұрын

隻雞真係叫得貴

@taifu1688 3 ай бұрын

Bragg 當導演、Merchan 當Cameraman; 拍攝🎬出來的影片當然使到所有觀眾都會看到👀的片段🎬是什麼結局呢...

@popgomouse 3 ай бұрын

香港二次回歸，權勢所作所為，已經無透明度、無公眾知情權。特朗普呢單案，犯案重點就係掩飾、無透明度。對一些依然沉迷於祟拜特朗普嘅香港KOLs，我好質疑佢哋開口埋口所講香港人普世價值，有幾真實。

@CAT_7E 3 ай бұрын

咁即係承認特朗普講大話啦，特朗普講大話就無咩問題? 約翰遜在疫情期間開PARTY都因為道德失格比人趕落台啦

@taifu1688 3 ай бұрын

其實Johnson 及Trump 都對Covid 19 充滿錯誤觀念！因此他們都受到感染！只不過、命大、沒有因此失去生命。身為國家領導人、向民眾發放「嚴重錯誤病理訊息」實在太不負責任

@juliefmwu 3 ай бұрын

這審訊在深藍州開審一開始就唔公平，在藍州陪審員怎選都可以是藍

@MiddleL555 3 ай бұрын

藍州所有人支持民主黨？究竟 Trump 為香港人做咗咩？咁多盲粉嘅？

@positiveenergy4545 3 ай бұрын

陪審員又唔係民主黨派出来的，這案的陪審員全經過瘋老Trump的律師審核過才批准出任，咁又关蓝州乜事呀？佢自己做壞事，咎由自取！

@wlee394 3 ай бұрын

@@MiddleL555「盲粉」說得好！

@amen9354 3 ай бұрын

只是細小案件不會對 Donald Trump 做總統有影响, 1998年前美國總統克林頓與萊温斯基性醜聞案件，克林頓一樣無事

@char6736 3 ай бұрын

😂impeachment 彈劾佢⋯⋯彈走咗，再選返佢

@krislokki7355 3 ай бұрын

Michael Cohen 自己要draw 佢自己home equity loan 去比stormy Daniel hush money 先, Donald Trump 𢓭來才reimburse 比Michael Cohen. Donald Trump 同劉細良一様、人格有問題、劉非常支持Trump, 倆人有共通點就自已永遠冇錯、自己係神一樣、錯永遠只會係人哋😂😂😂

@TELEVISIBLE 3 ай бұрын

拜登真係太老，成日痴呆發作到不能否認😅Trump 又真係有機入策。

@richball4156 3 ай бұрын

支持特朗普！就係失敗都支持佢！

@joanneli189 3 ай бұрын

Let's pray for Trump ok

@juliefmwu 3 ай бұрын

民主黨在紐約州和加州可以隻手遮天

@alicewaimanwan2717 3 ай бұрын

蓬佩奧

@sungchung3588 3 ай бұрын

侵侵目無法紀，一定被判坐監。最好是判坐3年監，加罰十億。

@mcdull9413 3 ай бұрын

侵最錯就係俾揞口費同激嬲佢嘅白手套，除非殺人放火，佢嘅人設就係做乜都好，點崩壞都一樣咁多盲粉(同啲良粉一樣)。我一直都支持Nikki Haley贏共和黨候選人，佢選總統一定投佢，但千祈唔好跪低做侵嘅副總統，有Trump(甚至DeSantis)我一定投民主黨。共和黨都有人講過US President係一個role model，而Trump唔係佢想啲仔女見到嘅role model (2020年我鬼揞眼投咗Trump，好彩結果唔係佢)

@marcoliverpool 3 ай бұрын

但係拜登一上台～緬甸～阿富汗～烏克蘭～哈馬斯！邊個做都會發生㗎啦🤔唔會囉我又冇票，只想和平 2020你冇鬼揞眼，可能係當時，原來中東都可以平静，每個壞蛋都見到MQ9係咁樣用。唔知昂山素姬點！仲有冇人記得阿富汗死咗嗰 13個美軍！塔利班執政，唔知阿富汗啲人民有冇幸福！啲非法難民，去到美國可以攞幾千蚊美金福利，幾好！

@ec188 3 ай бұрын

I bet you live in CA, NY, OR, WA. I am happy not working in those states anymore! There are no much difference between CCP and the states now.

@garysum9121 3 ай бұрын

Is a joke when you said Nikki Hayley as a preferable president.

@chifengchenny 3 ай бұрын

一知半解

@edmondlam5488 3 ай бұрын

論人格， Trump 唔適合做總統。

@zzzoo2772 3 ай бұрын

人格😂！形象工程而已！普通人有多了解總統們的真正人格。Trump 根本冇形象可言。所以他都不理會了😂！

@PuyochaGaming 3 ай бұрын

點先叫公平？今年審埋BIDEN部LAPTOP就公平啦

@70-860 3 ай бұрын

邊個 Biden 呀？原來 hunter biden 做仔嘅選總統

@nappleonfire 3 ай бұрын

@@70-860 你都傻下傻下，hunter biden同烏克蘭有洗錢記錄，係biden當時做副總統既事

@willialuke 3 ай бұрын

@@nappleonfire唔知邊個儍呢，部laptop已經通了天，國會亦看過，但抓不出任何與Joe Biden犯法行為. 請看看以下連結。 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy

@passerby933 3 ай бұрын

@@willialuke請你睇清楚先講啦，data有冇俾人改過冇辦法證實。FBI hold 左個 laptop 咁耐，已經發現有folders 加左落去呀。 Two forensic analysts who independently examined the data for The Washington Post[4] authenticated 1,828 and 22,000 emails, respectively, of the almost 129,000 emails on the hard drive in 2022. Neither analyst could verify the vast majority of the data, nor could they find clear evidence of tampering but they note "key pieces of evidence useful in discovering tampering were not available." In some cases, The Post matched content to other sources "that the experts were not able to assess". The unverifiable emails included some prominently reported previously by other news outlets. The analysis found that people other than Hunter Biden had created six new folders on the drive over a week after the original report by the New York Post and months after the laptop had been taken into FBI custody. It also found that data had been accessed and copied off the drive by people other than Hunter Biden over the course of nearly three years.[4]

@sungchung3588 3 ай бұрын

輸左又賴東賴西，被判有罪就要告埋其他人，玩陪葬咩?!