Funnily enough, the V-22 isn’t even an attack aircraft. It’s strictly meant for cargo and troop transport.
@galacticbananastopmotions72922 жыл бұрын
And on top of that the LEGO version was meant to be a civilian version.
@AScottish-AustralianM-842 жыл бұрын
@@galacticbananastopmotions7292 Wait, there is a civilian version of the V-22 Osprey?
@galacticbananastopmotions72922 жыл бұрын
@@AScottish-AustralianM-84 I don’t think it exists in real life but lego said it was meant to not be a military version Idk. I’d love to get one and put a usmc logo on it lol
@akutuominen50622 жыл бұрын
@@AScottish-AustralianM-84 There isn't.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@akutuominen5062 true, so far there isn't a civilian version nor plans to make them in the near future.
@generalgabrielsatori2 жыл бұрын
the jet in the set 31086 is based on the prototype fighter SU-47 Berkut, 2 main forward swept wings and 6 stabilizers.
@mig-21interceptor622 жыл бұрын
I thought that too lol
@Black_Sea_Tiger2 жыл бұрын
exaclty I said SU-47 too but he said based on game also he showed video from game the plane wings not like this :)
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@Black_Sea_Tiger i think I might make a video adressing this issue. :)
@randomguyoninternetidk40142 жыл бұрын
I believe it resembles more of the X-29, and experimental jet first flown by NASA.
@Black_Sea_Tiger2 жыл бұрын
@@randomguyoninternetidk4014 oh yeah most likely it is... but when people see it mostly remember Su-47 because its more famous 😅 but yeah the lego probably X-29 almost same 🙂
@boeingthepyroraptor70852 жыл бұрын
Lego has made LOTS of chinooks, including a black one for black widow quite recently. Probably the closest thing to an army set we’ve gotten. (I know most chinooks aren’t black but it could be a Special forces chinook)
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
I might add that to my next video. This video only talked about the planes of the Creator line but I can expand to other themes on my next one.
@TheRandompaint2 жыл бұрын
How about the military vehicles and plane from the Indiana Jones line?!
@Brave_Sir_Robin2 жыл бұрын
Not to mention all the Indiana Jones sets
@844SteamFan2 жыл бұрын
My cousin modified one of the police chinooks to add guns on it lol
@mrbojangles93482 жыл бұрын
Contrary to popular belief, special forces don't just paint all their gear black and frequently use regular colour-schemed equipment
@xYoshiLP.2 жыл бұрын
the "Outcry" on the Technic V-22 was that the Gerbox for it's functions was extreamly unreliable
@jameson12392 жыл бұрын
There was also and outcry from a German peace organization
@gayorsomethingidk5532 жыл бұрын
That makes a lot more sense! Do you have any idea if anyone made an improved version?
@ridgelineenjoyer1517 Жыл бұрын
Just like the real one
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Its the one featured in this video
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
How could there be outcry if the set was removed before it was even released? 😅
@revvingnoodle71922 жыл бұрын
And that is where companies like Cobi come in with sweet mikitary sets taking customers away from lego, as owner of an f-14, f-18, me-262 and bf-110 i can confirm that they are really sweet sets
@97denis972 жыл бұрын
Yeah i also transitioned from Lego to Cobi because they have everything my heart desired for in the past 15 years, that Lego didnt want to deliver because of muh virtue signaling...
@dronessential2 жыл бұрын
And the part quality is 99% there, and there are no damn stickers, but excellent prints instead.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
I do admit that Cobi has great sets and very affordable prices compared to LEGO. Personally, I prefer to make my own designs but the problem of building with LEGO is the price of making a new Model. Some of my ships and planes can easily cost 200eurs to make on a rare color :D
@braedynhoward36442 жыл бұрын
Same for me.I used to be a leogo purest, until I found my fascination for military history and military vehicles. I have the tiger 1 tank, the easy 8 Sherman, the bf 109 (latest model), the spitfire, and the corsair (latest model). They are all quality sets, even their bricks are quality, and I plan on getting some more modern planes, such as the f 18 hornet, which my dad flew. They also just came out with the mig 15, which looks SWEEET!
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@braedynhoward3644 my only problem with Cobi plane designs are their landing gears. Early examples look too large and clumsy. But i think the newer designs are a little better
@NareshSinghOctagon2 жыл бұрын
It's always the boomer parents ruining the greatest things. If not them,it's the brats who are far too young at the time the parents aren't watching. And it's such a smooth looking Technic set too...
@michaelkeaton53942 жыл бұрын
The v22 was retired because part of the profit from the set would've went to the millitary part of boeing that make the v22 osprey, so by buying the lego set you would've funded the war efforst of the US, it seems normal anyone wouldn't want to do that through a toy brand, use your brain...
@projectx74532 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@NareshSinghOctagon2 жыл бұрын
@@michaelkeaton5394 ,and you think the Americans wouldn't want to do that?
@michaelkeaton53942 жыл бұрын
@@NareshSinghOctagonI'm a french consumer i don't want to fund the USA's war effort. Lego is a danish company and does not only sell lego in america, and even if it did, i'm sure not every one would be stoke to have toy that fund war. the USA do whatever they want with their insane cult of war but they better not impose it on the rest of the world, i would've baught the lego osprey if it was not for the gear malfunction and the boeing partnership
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Well, Lego sold the Boeing 787 so they technically funded Boeing...
@dannypipewrench5332 жыл бұрын
2:35 MY DAD HAS BEEN WATCHING TOPGUN NONSTOP. I KNEW THAT WAS AN F-14 THE MOMENT I SAW IT. I figured there would be reference to that the moment I began typing.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Lol. Its one of the most beautiful planes ever made
@Klombo11428 күн бұрын
Same!
@KristofferEk2 жыл бұрын
I think the biggest trouble for the osprey wasn't so much parents who didn't want it out seeing as it as an "advanced" technic set for 16+ ages but rather the Afol community as the small 16 tooth gears (I think they are 16 tooth the smallest gears Lego makes) striped in the gear box to spin the rotors. Also what about the Lego city sets the stunt planes and race planes respectively.
@danielshin45262 жыл бұрын
The smallest gear is the 8-tooth
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
😀
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
They are presented on my other videos 😀
@sinisterisrandom85372 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say the Futuristic flyer is based on the plane from Ace Combat rather it took more design looks from the Prototype X-29
@pongkhaicha55512 жыл бұрын
or SU-47
@Heavygamingreal2 жыл бұрын
Or the Strike Wyvern
@somehotmeal88232 жыл бұрын
It's wings are mostly based on the adfx shinden and the fuselage of the xfa 27
@CrayonEater2552 жыл бұрын
I thought it was Su-47 inspired
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=bdgxvyo5ql3pSf5g
@3in_baum9032 жыл бұрын
As far as I heard the V-22 wasn't not released beacause of just being a military "helicopter", but because it actually had the cooperation with Bell/Boing which are Armor factorys and in the Lego AGB stands that they don't wanna support those people. Another unofficial reason was the motor. When using those motors a few times the gearwheel often broke and had to be replaced, what they obviously woundn't let be sold like this.
@michaelkeaton53942 жыл бұрын
thank you, finally someone with some comon sens!!!
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if lego will release metal parts to replace those parts that suffer excessive damage overtime
@米空軍パイロット2 жыл бұрын
At 2:20, that's gotta be an SB2C. The curved tail design is a signature of Curtiss.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Some say that it looks like the Dauntless too. It seems to me that its an easily adaptable design to many WW2 US NAVY designs. Its a great set, the only problem are the colours
@RichardFStripeRendezvous2 жыл бұрын
I agree, it's definitely a either a Helldiver, a Dauntless, or a hybrid of the two. It's way too big my minifig standards to be a fighter and has a two place cockpit
@schifflein91032 жыл бұрын
Looks kinda like an F4F to me
@floyvlogs17542 жыл бұрын
It also gives me T-6 Texan vibes, as the Texan doesn't have a 'gull wing' (bent wing like the F4U) and it was a 2-seater trainer for dive bomber aircraft.
@janhes141 Жыл бұрын
@@RichardFStripeRendezvous Yeah, it definitely is more resemblent of a US navy dive bomber, I remember when I was like 12 and had this set, I was obsessed with the Pacific war, so I just threw away the rear part of canopy and put a twin machine gun I made there instead, and even made a launching system for the bomb (and the bomb itself), similar to what Stuka had, so the bomb wouldnt damage the propeller.
@barnykirashi2 жыл бұрын
1:58 The Focke-Wulf Ta-154 Moskito actually had an engine like that. It was an inverted V engine, with a round cowling to fit the radiators around the shaft, which resembles a radial engine. Pretty common in german plane design. (see: Junkers Ju-88, Junkers Ju-288, Focke-Wulf FW-190D series, Heinkel He-219, Focke-Wulf Ta-152) Except the Ta-154 is a High-Wing Monoplane design
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, it could be based on the Ta-154 with a few modifications. That would explain the exaust pipes. Thank you for your comment!
@arturoquintanilla56072 жыл бұрын
It also reminds me a lot of the Ju 88
@jsplicer92 жыл бұрын
Nice Hungarian armor roundel
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@jsplicer9 indeed!
@mammutMK22 жыл бұрын
Lego not selling military sets...cobi: hold my beer
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
And they are getting lots of money 😀
@hikton72932 жыл бұрын
The super soarer (this one at 4:31) is in my eyes also heavily based on the F-14 Tomcat, considering it got some designfeatures that are very simelar, like the twin engines, tandem cockpit, variable sweept wings, giant elevators, flat fuselage and twin rudders. Only thing I feel is missing is more spread out exhaustes, angled engine intakes, and the fuselage underneeth the cockpit should've been elevated. But it's obvious that they couldn't include such features both to keep it less simelar to the original, but also since those features might compromise the other features considering it's at such a small scale
@t65bx252 жыл бұрын
The older Super Soarer (yellow one) is a single-tailed F-15
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
At the time I didnt know it had variable swept wings... now I can see that its indeed an F-14
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Could be, yes
@iceilator2 жыл бұрын
0:57 is definitely more based on something like the A-26 Invader
@Nivaroniko Жыл бұрын
Maybe the b-26 as it looks like there are less turrets on the top?
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Could be. Or the A-20 Boston
@tommotos4634 ай бұрын
Its more like a A-20 havoc
@coffeeinhandproductions32382 жыл бұрын
Interesting comparisons. Some of those larger 3 in one creator sets were nearly spot on yet with no outcry as they were colorful, and marketed as I guess air show jets. Just going to add City has hand a handful of twin rotor helicopters guised up as police transports though number one for me is the twin rotor from the most recent standalone Black Widow set which isn't even disguised for what it obviously is.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
True. Its featured on my part 2 or part 3 video
@RayShadow2782 жыл бұрын
The XFA-22 doesn't have forward swept wings, plus it is proportionally way larger than the futuristic flier. It is more likely for it to be based on the Grumman X-29 but with 2 tails instead of 1
@cbspock17012 жыл бұрын
I was thinking of the X-29 as well
@t65bx252 жыл бұрын
If we're going real-world, the Berkut is way closer.
@ruskiwaffle19912 жыл бұрын
I like to think of it as the talon fighter from "stealth"
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@t65bx25 It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@greebland2 жыл бұрын
The military isn't all violent, for example, you can be an engineer, a teacher (instructor), a doctor (medic), hell, you can even be a plumber.
@michaelkeaton53942 жыл бұрын
yea because all of these job do not participate in helping the war effort...
@greebland2 жыл бұрын
@@michaelkeaton5394 this is me saying that the military isn't completely violent.. not that those jobs are supposed to help in such "war"
@chinookh47132 жыл бұрын
@@michaelkeaton5394 Militaries aren't just for fight the USCG for example does rescues the USMC National Guard Navy and Army all have done disaster relief so their not just for war
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
True, you're right. The mission of the military is to protect its people and the Nation
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Indeed! 😀👍
@Commander_Wolffe2 жыл бұрын
2:23- I agree, but I think that it looks more lika an SBD-3 Dauntless
@samuelsnowdon22712 жыл бұрын
nah more like the p47
@TheStig_TG2 жыл бұрын
It's way to thick and big,
@samuelsnowdon22712 жыл бұрын
@@TheStig_TG exactly its a p47 agreed?
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Could be. Its easy to modify it into the Dauntless
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Could be both actually. Its a two seater, so...
@scpfoundation83762 жыл бұрын
Let’s just keep in mind that Lego cancelled the V-22 (Cargo/Transport aircraft) because military, but that didn’t stop them from releasing MANY sets that involved Chinnok Twin blade choppers. Not to mention that one sky police set with a helicopter that clearly looks like a Bell AH-1 Cobra Attack chopper.
@liker32642 жыл бұрын
are you are “drevniy ukr”? abo saloyed
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
True
@AlemaumZ2 жыл бұрын
The Lego 31039 Blue power jet is a Japanese project called X-2 Shinshin.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
The only problem is that the X-2 is a twin jet engine design while the Blue Power only has one main engine (plus a Vtol engine like the F-35B).
@aidan44722 жыл бұрын
3:45 the specifics I saw was that the gearbox was shoddy, and would either wear out the gears or the motor.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
True, I've heard that. But when that happens, LEGO prefers to just release the set and send replacing parts to fix the issue. Otherwise, they could have just open the boxes, fix the issue and re-release it if they didnt have any problems with the set. The boxes were already produced anyway
@Veselyi_Porosya2 жыл бұрын
1:29 Su-47 berkut !!!
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Its all explained here on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@samschellhase88312 жыл бұрын
I feel like some of these are just the most famous versions of these. There are multiple types of tandem rotor helicopters, I don’t think it was necessarily based off the chinook. And the Technic V-22 controversy was because it’s an active military plane, and usually LEGO tries to stay away from active military sets, to at least appear neutral and not favoring one or another military. Makes sense commercially.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
So which one could it be? There aren't that many tandem rotor helicopters
@boeingthepyroraptor70852 жыл бұрын
I find it hilarious that this German peace group complained at Lego for making an osprey Peace Groups be like: Putin invades Ukraine: Understandable have a nice day Lego tries to make an osprey: *Riots*
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Really? They weren´t against the Invasion?
@boeingthepyroraptor70852 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda as far as I know, they couldn’t care less
@chinookh47132 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda At first Germany slowed it down probably out fear of WWIII and their new Oil pipeline with Russia
@sandermur56132 жыл бұрын
i feel like the futuristic fighter fits more to the look of the Su-47 Berkut rather than the XFA-27 Scarface from ace combat.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@Andrew-se4tg2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video man! More people need to point this stuff out!👍👍👍
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@squirreltamer2548 Жыл бұрын
1:23 That set is actually based on the Grumman X-29 forward swept wing prototype. It was an experimental aircraft testbed for hypermanuverability.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@danielsanhueza14909 ай бұрын
and a sukhoy su 47 bekut
@troutwarrior67352 жыл бұрын
And this is where cobi comes in. Seriously, their sets are great.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
I like them too; the only thing I hate is their landing gears, they don´t fit on the wings so they hang under them. A bit clumsy looking
@Phoenix44th2 жыл бұрын
1:23 correction its a su 47
@TheStig_TG2 жыл бұрын
More X-29
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@DahanLiam2 жыл бұрын
LEGO INDIANA JONES 7193 there is 1:1 replica of an P-2 air plane (Pilatus P-2 was a Swiss military training airplane used for fighter pilot training in the Nazi Luftwaffe.) and a 1:1 replica of The D-EKVY ( This airplane was a German military airplane designed for reconnaissance and defense.)
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Indeed.
@aerospacematt91472 жыл бұрын
The Blue Power Jet is actually a kitbash of the F-35 which you showed and the F-22. It’s got some features from the F-22 incorporated into the design if you look closely enough (including Elevator shape and Vertical stabilizer shape/diagonal angle.)
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
True, its a mix of the two
@zachboyd47492 жыл бұрын
2:21 With the design of the tail, the twin seat cockpit, and the way the gear folds up, I thought that plane more resembles the Curtiss SB2C Helldiver dive bomber.
@zenturion252 жыл бұрын
that was the coment i was searching for :-)
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Or the Dauntless
@zachboyd4749 Жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda I don't see it, the SBD's tail isn't that big when compared to the rest of the airframe. The SB2C's is. There are also small design features that definitely more resemble the Helldiver rather than the Dauntless, such as the fact that the cockpit isn't that far back from the nose on the Dauntless. Put the two side by side and you can see the design differences between them.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
@@zachboyd4749 sure, it could be the Helldiver. it´s an option too.
@reapertalon2 жыл бұрын
1:30 actually the Futuristic Flyer set is loosely based on the Grumman X-29, an experimental nasal aircraft designed to test forward swept wings. It was based on the airframe of a f5 tiger
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Its all explained here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@danny_boi35372 жыл бұрын
The 60103 airshow set has one plane very similar to the F/A-18 Hornet, though it's a single seater. It also has one that might be based off the Eurofighter Typhoon. (Edit) The second one looks more like the Rafale fighter, now that I see it again
@TacticalBaguette2 жыл бұрын
Hornet has both 2 seater and single seater variants so it's still relatively accurate in that regard
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
They are featured on my part 3 or 4 video
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Indeed
@camdix32509 ай бұрын
Very nice look back at some lovely LEGO kits. It's interesting that replica models of actual military hardware are considered inappropriate by some people, while models of "superheroes" and their equipment are acceptable. Of course, I am misguided, for superheroes never, ever engage in any forms of violence. :)
@joaoonda8 ай бұрын
I totally agree with you, but what we can do? :D
@sscchhnert2 жыл бұрын
I think the set at 1:25 is more likely to be based off the soechoj soe-47 jet
@notsasuke222222 жыл бұрын
Sukhoi*
@sscchhnert2 жыл бұрын
Sure
@ultrablade91822 жыл бұрын
yeah i think so too
@polakrodak85382 жыл бұрын
That's not how "russian" language works
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=bdgxvyo5ql3pSf5g
@mr.dangernoodle629411 ай бұрын
I always thought the yellow, blue, and white 3 in 1 Creator plane looked like the Dauntless. I liked it so much that I have three of them.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Could be the T-6G Texan too (I think)
@acekiller5022 жыл бұрын
The aviation adventures set 31011 is probably more based off of the dauntless from WWII. Edit: set 31086 also looks like an su47
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=zwEFrcz2gqe6ins0
@ToyotaTacomaOfficial11 ай бұрын
I wish Lego could just make the sets with the actual colors and names without parents getting offended because these are all really cool and I would probably want them of I were younger
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
You can still buy them! Why only play when you are a kid? 😀
@sonicguyver7445 Жыл бұрын
The Blue Power Jet is still awesome. I got it used years ago and love it. I just want to know how to do those missile builds under the grey one seen here. I have seen those images for years but can't figure out how to do the missiles. But this is pretty cool in general, seeing all the historical and modern planes that inspired these Lego sets. I think they are more interesting seeing their real-life inspiration.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Indeed. There's picture of that mod on Flickr I think
@wacky_duck10952 жыл бұрын
"omg you arent supposed to have military planes they make kids violent omg" Every single toy plane manufacturer and cobi: *intense sweating*
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s easy for anti-war movements to attack bigger enterprises like LEGO because they can´t really respond. A good example was the end of the cooperation between Shell and LEGO which ended some years ago because of a greenpeace action.
@wacky_duck10952 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda and apple with the gun emoji
@ΜιλτιαδηςΜπομπορης2 жыл бұрын
could you do a documentary about the Greek battleship averof .
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
I would love to! I might visit Greece next year and I'm planning a tour to the ship and I will make a short documentary after that visit :D
@ΜιλτιαδηςΜπομπορης2 жыл бұрын
Great. Thank you
@williamgritton1912 Жыл бұрын
I think doing a line of creator expert sets based off ww2 and cold War aircraft would be awesome
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@f.u.m.o.5669Ай бұрын
0:03 This brought back some memories. I remember building this in my childhood.
@ragemonster42772 жыл бұрын
Although it is disappointing, I do respect Lego’s decision. The only problem was the osprey technic set was that Lego made a license agreement with Bel Boeing which is in fact a military contractor and that can get into some nasty political stuff for Lego’s behalf real fast since Boeing would be profiting from this. Historically speaking, military contractors are not good people
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Recently I read that the set actually have a major mechanical flaw and LEGO used the whole "Public Outcry" as an excuse to remove the sets before they were sold with a defect. Not sure if it´s true but there are a series of videos on youtube about that mechanical issue.
@ragemonster42772 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda I’ve looked deeper into those “mechanical failures” and actually there isn’t really a problem if people aren’t playing with the propellers while functioning. If I am being honest there are a lot of other sets in the past where this can happen like for example if someone keeps forcing down a digger arm that is powered by screw gears, the gears would start chipping or if a hydraulic keeps reaching its move limit with motor and the user just keeps letting it click away for more than several seconds. The large tow truck from the early 2000s has a model b that used the buggy motor for functions and it would be strong enough to destroy the gears if misused
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@ragemonster4277 I see, thank you for the explanation. So it seems that it was probably a combination of those two factors that led to the removable of that set.
@ragemonster42772 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda that’s what I think so but I believe that Lego really had no realization of the mechanical problem as I think that was discovered a while later from forums that began to gain trend just like the Land Rover cracking differential issue where users would build the engine wrong because the instructions did not specifically to align the diffs that shared the same axle
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@ragemonster4277 Well, at this point everyone is already used to receive updates to fix the mistakes on their instructions from LEGO. I had that issue for the first time almost ten years ago with the Space Shuttle. Not sure if the solution for the V-22 was easy or not to fix, I will look into that (out of curiosity). 😄
@kabob007711 ай бұрын
1:31 I KNEW IT LOOKED LIKE AN ACE COMBAT SUPER PLANE! Finally, someone else sees it!
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Finally! Someone that also sees it!
@gm_mallparking2 жыл бұрын
"Military toys make kids violent" PROCEEDS TO MAKE A GIANT AT AT ROBOT AND A BALL THAT CAN DESTROY A PLANET USING LASER.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Indeed. Lego managers are a bunch of hypocrites
@gm_mallparking2 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda i agree
@mihailos8701Ай бұрын
As a Lego fan, I can confirm that Lego is practically ok with everything that's practically violent military things, as long as they are non-realistic equivalent, which I do agree is kinda sad
@majikkskates908411 ай бұрын
The technic V-22 was also pulled because it’s moving mechanisms were breaking the gears inside
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Honestly, I don´t think that was the problem. LEGO has already released sets with problems in the past and they were quick to send parts and instructions to correct those issues; also each set goes through a lengthy period of tests before it´s release... I don´t think they would let it go into the market with that major flaw. However, you could be right and they used the excuse of that Anti-war group to remove the set without any major issues.
@max-mg7gk2 жыл бұрын
I personally believe that set 31086 resembles the x-29 plane. It's unfortunate that lego canceled the v-22 osprey set.
@tulip39562 жыл бұрын
it also slightly looks like su 47
@stuka_bly4t1022 жыл бұрын
I think it remembers more the su 47, but yes, with that inverted wing design it looks also like an x29
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
@@stuka_bly4t102 It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@kabob007711 ай бұрын
0:41 Ah, so we can give our little Lego Monarch a Prez.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
😅
@shimyaa2 жыл бұрын
the v-22 has two 50 cals on the sides for protection
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Again, FOR protection...
@shimyaa11 ай бұрын
@@joaoonda Of course FOR protection...
@MrAnimeWolf2 жыл бұрын
I remember as a kid building a jet that looked like one of the blue angels with the "legos" at my grandmother's house, they were definitely some kind of offbrand legos
@andreasbader53412 жыл бұрын
You mean lego 6331 perharps.. Looks like a F15
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
😀
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
😀
@hyphencubed2 жыл бұрын
I'd say set 31086 looks closer to the Su-47.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@mihailos8701Ай бұрын
Thanks for a good video about a category of sets from one of my most favorite Lego themes :)
@M60A32 жыл бұрын
The 31086 could be based on the Russian su-47
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@Angelthewolf2 жыл бұрын
Lego: noooo we can‘t do military sets, that will make us look bad! Cobi: Sluban: Bluebrixx: QuanQuan (however that is written):
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
And there's more...
@ViperZero52311 ай бұрын
0:21 seems to be a 2 seater f-22
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
With a single Vtol engine instead of two rear engines? Thing is, most likely its a F-22 on the front with a Vtol engine at the rear I think...
@ViperZero52311 ай бұрын
@@joaoonda everything except the VTOL and the 2 seater is F-22A, engine might be F-35B and the cockpit is either F-14A or F/A-18F. I suspect the engine is like that for copyright reasons and the fact of the thrust vectoring nozzles on the F-22A are very weird
@Mr.C_WT2 жыл бұрын
Lego set 31099 resemble an super stallion helicopter and a a10 warthog its a 3 in 1 set
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
I dont see the Super Stallion, that one is clearly a EC120 Colibri helicopter.
@skoda456411 ай бұрын
Meanwhile my childhood was surrounded by military toys Some notable ones I remember is remote-controlled Abrams, die-cast Willy's Jeep, F-15 model, and a toy M16 rifle. And look at me, I'm perfectly sane and totally not causing warcrimes
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Same as I! I had a huge collection of planes, swords, guns and a few tanks and warships. 😀
@arnfrancistapic7612 жыл бұрын
Military is a honor not violence
@arnfrancistapic7612 жыл бұрын
@Evolt Claw- X maybe they are reffering to warcrimes to US, Germany, Russia etc
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
True
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Indeed
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
😀
@panzerjagertigerporsche Жыл бұрын
0:54 that more reminds me the A-20 Havoc seeing that the wings are high-mounted and not low-mounted
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Could be, with a few modificiations, sure
@inmatureopinion.11 ай бұрын
I don't understand why there isn't more military sets,it doesn't make kids violent,it give them what they want really,because imagine you're having a lego dogfight,how cool is it to be able to chip off pieces as the fight goes on
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Indeed! But with the Wook culture currently amongst us, its really difficult to release military sets.
@tritonox84722 жыл бұрын
I built that lego set 4 years ago. Haven't even thought about that.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
😀
@memelephant2 жыл бұрын
Bruh the technic V-22 actually looked dope, sad they removed it
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
I agree with you
@Rodeo072 жыл бұрын
The futuristic flyer immediately looked to me like the Grumman X-29 of the 80s
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@alexcinx2 жыл бұрын
I really hope we get another F-14 Tomcat inspired jet build in the future, it’s a truly remarkable design
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Indeed!
@Generl1107Ай бұрын
The twin engine personally looks like an A-20 to me
@caesar77342 жыл бұрын
3:09 You should have also mentioned the minifigure scale 4439 Heavy-Lift Helicopter
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It will be featured on my next episode 😄
@silverfortytwo95062 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty certain the V-22 set was withdrawn as it tended to strip and destroy its gears, not because it was a military vehicle
@Supersoldier20122 жыл бұрын
I also think
@LimChingLiang2 жыл бұрын
Removed because of military aircraft. Lego got complaint from German Peace Society. Official statement, LEGO said: The LEGO Technic Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey was designed to highlight the important role the aircraft plays in search and rescue efforts. While the set clearly depicts how a rescue version of the plane might look, the aircraft is only used by the military. We have a long-standing policy not to create sets which feature real military vehicles, so it has been decided not to proceed with the launch of this product. We appreciate that some fans who were looking forward to this set may be disappointed, but we believe it's important to ensure that we uphold our brand values.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment 😀
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
It seems that it was a combination of the two...
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
I believe it was a combination of the two. They noticed the gear problem but when that happens, normally the set is still released and they sent new parts to fix the issue. Just a few weeks after it was released, someone fixed the problem of the set with just minor parts. To me, it was a combination of the two problems, the gear issue and politics
@ToyotaTacomaOfficial11 ай бұрын
These are awesome and I had no idea they existed
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
They still release this sort of sets every year. We just need to keep an eye and identify them 😀
@readygames85872 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget the police and black widow chinooks, or the coast guard or police UH-60 blackhawks, or the many little birds.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
They are mentioned on my next videos
@Mig21Fishbed1952 жыл бұрын
I wish Lego could make a military branch for those vehicles
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
So do I...
@TUPLsEverywhere Жыл бұрын
The Blue Power Jet's side vents and tail resemble that of an F-22, making it sort of a F-35/F-22 hybrid, but other than that pretty accurate.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Yes, it only has one main engine at the rear plus another for vertical take off. So its a hybrid of the two
@TUPLsEverywhere Жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda Yep. Also, I just noticed that its wings and elevators are also that of the F-22.
@carson.strong_2 жыл бұрын
The “Futuristic Flyer” gives off some hefty X-29 vibes
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@oldrageface87062 жыл бұрын
I would say the controversy aroung the V-22 was that it was officially a license model, with the trademark from Boeing and all the shenanigans. Lego hadn't done 5 minutes of research to find out that Boeing is also a major military contractor, not only building passenger planes.
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Yes, that was the only reason
@alperenerol18522 жыл бұрын
Military kits make kids violent... Releases a dinosaur set that eats human
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
True, and many other things.
@TheGreatLlamaJockey2 жыл бұрын
I played with legos as a kid and I’m a plane nerd now, the algorithms know me too well
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Wow! Awesome!
@StenWasTaken11 ай бұрын
The first plane is actually based of the F-A/18F Super Hornet too I think, due to it being a two seater
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
This plane is completely different from the Super Hornet.
@kabob007711 ай бұрын
2:36 That is a Tomcat... Man, for all that Lego goes on about how they won't do military stuff and whatnot they sure do make a lot of Lego sets based of military aircraft.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Indeed
@cybercat7851 Жыл бұрын
I would say that the Sonic Boom is closer to a Gripen than a Rafale because the Gripen’s air intakes are on the side while the Rafale’s are closer to the bottom.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Sure, it can be
@HERSHEY775_Gaming2 жыл бұрын
2:22 maybe a Buffalo? (F2A)
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Too big
@cybercat7851 Жыл бұрын
The Futurisitc flyer is almost certainly based on the Sukhoi SU-47, although I do appreciate the AC7 nod.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
It´s all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@TheMemeDynamics2 жыл бұрын
The futuristic flyer thing looks more like the Su-47 Berkut
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@branislavradojevic78982 жыл бұрын
“We have a strict policy regarding military models, and therefore, we do not produce tanks, helicopters, etc." proceeds to make a Sophwith Camel (from WW1) and Lego Creator plane that looks like Lockheed Martin F-35
@joaoonda2 жыл бұрын
Yap. Hiprocasy at its best
@branislavradojevic78982 жыл бұрын
@@joaoonda E
@BarnieDaDinosaurАй бұрын
0:29 no its actually based on the f-22 raptor not the f-35 lightning. If you look up a picture of the f-22 and f-35 you can tell it looks more like the f-22.
@SixshotHonkai2 жыл бұрын
The set 42113 give me a flashback to Toa Phantoka Pohatu
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
😀
@joaopedroschramm19482 жыл бұрын
Love it 🙌🏼
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@haziqamsyar200911 ай бұрын
Bristol Beaufighter also kinda looks like A De Havilland Mosquito
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
True, but the overall shape of the airframe is identical to the Mosquito. Still, you can make a Beaufighter out of it, by adding a dorsal cupola and modifying the tail
@RichardFStripeRendezvous2 жыл бұрын
I disagree with a lot of these comparisons but I love these kinds of videos, would be cool to see more on Lego planes vs their real counterparts
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Ok thanks but what do you disagree?
@f1ltitanic7 ай бұрын
You forget to add Sopwith camel(3451 old 10226 new and 40049 mini version) This is small replica of ww1 fighter plane with same name
@joaoonda7 ай бұрын
Yes, but that's not a disguised aircraft, its an adaptation of a real design
@sukhoisu-27flankerbdude922 жыл бұрын
WHAT THE V-22 LOOKS SICK WHYYY
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
I still dont know... politics...
@Shifter123811 ай бұрын
The Futuristic Flyer is possibly based off the SU-47 "Berkut" due to the inversed wings
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
It´s all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk
@lucagerulat3072 жыл бұрын
As far as I know the osprey was retired because of an construction error that would put a lot of stress on a gear and might brake it and that is why it's actually retired.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
It now seems that it was a combination of the two
@pearified371 Жыл бұрын
2:11 no, it's most likely an f-16 because of the egg shaped cockpit, and the f-5 has a sloped cockpit instead.
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Its a combination of the two
@gbornitz11 ай бұрын
The sonic boom jet looks more like a chinese J-8/J-9 rather than a rafale. The rafale has no elevator behind the wing and the air intakes are half way under the fuselage. On the other hand the J-8 has a delta wing (triangular wing shape), elevators with the same shape behind the wing and air intakes at the side of the fuselage like the sonic boom jet. The J-9 (variant of the J-8) has the elevators in front of the wing instead of behind it (canards). The sonic boom jet has elevators in front and behind the wing, which is really rare for a jet.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Men, you went for a really obscure design. How about the Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-8?
@betaakey2 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact the airplane in the thumbnail is the same one my brother was making but couldn’t finish it so I built it up fully
@joaoonda Жыл бұрын
Cool!
@MTPodcasts5411 ай бұрын
The "futuristic flyer" set isn't based off of some video game aircraft. It's based off of the Sukhoi Su-47, which was an experimental Soviet aircraft that never saw service.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=bdgxvyo5ql3pSf5g
@pilotgeorge200011 ай бұрын
2:20: that's not a hybrid of the p47 and corsair, that is a near perfect recreation of a Yak-52. The giveaway is the tail. 3:00 while I can see it being an fw190, it appears to be an extra 300 with a radial engine.
@joaoonda11 ай бұрын
For the first example, I dont agree, it has a completly different landing gear. Its closer to the T-6 or the Dauntless. For the second, yes it could be but with those long wings and radial engine its totally rhe Ta-152. For the extra 300 you need to replace the engine, reduce the wings length and modify the landing gear... there are other race planes from lego closer to it
@m26a1pershing72 жыл бұрын
Glad to see I'm not the only one who saw the main build from Propeller Adventures and a civilianized Mosquito..............