TOP10 LEGO Plane Sets and their Military Equivalent

[@LILKRANKIN]

Funnily enough, the V-22 isn’t even an attack aircraft. It’s strictly meant for cargo and troop transport.

[@galacticbananastopmotions7292]

And on top of that the LEGO version was meant to be a civilian version.

[@AScottish-AustralianM-84]

@@galacticbananastopmotions7292 Wait, there is a civilian version of the V-22 Osprey?

[@galacticbananastopmotions7292]

@@AScottish-AustralianM-84 I don’t think it exists in real life but lego said it was meant to not be a military version Idk. I’d love to get one and put a usmc logo on it lol

[@akutuominen5062]

@@AScottish-AustralianM-84 There isn't.

[@joaoonda]

@@akutuominen5062 true, so far there isn't a civilian version nor plans to make them in the near future.

[@generalgabrielsatori]

the jet in the set 31086 is based on the prototype fighter SU-47 Berkut, 2 main forward swept wings and 6 stabilizers.

[@mig-21interceptor62]

I thought that too lol

[@Black_Sea_Tiger]

exaclty I said SU-47 too but he said based on game also he showed video from game the plane wings not like this :)

[@joaoonda]

@@Black_Sea_Tiger i think I might make a video adressing this issue. :)

[@randomguyoninternetidk4014]

I believe it resembles more of the X-29, and experimental jet first flown by NASA.

[@Black_Sea_Tiger]

@@randomguyoninternetidk4014 oh yeah most likely it is... but when people see it mostly remember Su-47 because its more famous 😅 but yeah the lego probably X-29 almost same 🙂

[@xYoshiLP.]

the "Outcry" on the Technic V-22 was that the Gerbox for it's functions was extreamly unreliable

[@jameson1239]

There was also and outcry from a German peace organization

[@gayorsomethingidk553]

That makes a lot more sense! Do you have any idea if anyone made an improved version?

[@ridgelineenjoyer1517]

Just like the real one

[@joaoonda]

Its the one featured in this video

[@joaoonda]

How could there be outcry if the set was removed before it was even released? 😅

[@boeingthepyroraptor7085]

Lego has made LOTS of chinooks, including a black one for black widow quite recently. Probably the closest thing to an army set we’ve gotten. (I know most chinooks aren’t black but it could be a Special forces chinook)

[@joaoonda]

I might add that to my next video. This video only talked about the planes of the Creator line but I can expand to other themes on my next one.

[@TheRandompaint]

How about the military vehicles and plane from the Indiana Jones line?!

[@Brave_Sir_Robin]

Not to mention all the Indiana Jones sets

[@844SteamFan]

My cousin modified one of the police chinooks to add guns on it lol

[@mrbojangles9348]

Contrary to popular belief, special forces don't just paint all their gear black and frequently use regular colour-schemed equipment

[@revvingnoodle7192]

And that is where companies like Cobi come in with sweet mikitary sets taking customers away from lego, as owner of an f-14, f-18, me-262 and bf-110 i can confirm that they are really sweet sets

[@97denis97]

Yeah i also transitioned from Lego to Cobi because they have everything my heart desired for in the past 15 years, that Lego didnt want to deliver because of muh virtue signaling...

[@dronessential]

And the part quality is 99% there, and there are no damn stickers, but excellent prints instead.

[@joaoonda]

I do admit that Cobi has great sets and very affordable prices compared to LEGO. Personally, I prefer to make my own designs but the problem of building with LEGO is the price of making a new Model. Some of my ships and planes can easily cost 200eurs to make on a rare color :D

[@braedynhoward3644]

Same for me.I used to be a leogo purest, until I found my fascination for military history and military vehicles. I have the tiger 1 tank, the easy 8 Sherman, the bf 109 (latest model), the spitfire, and the corsair (latest model). They are all quality sets, even their bricks are quality, and I plan on getting some more modern planes, such as the f 18 hornet, which my dad flew. They also just came out with the mig 15, which looks SWEEET!

[@joaoonda]

@@braedynhoward3644 my only problem with Cobi plane designs are their landing gears. Early examples look too large and clumsy. But i think the newer designs are a little better

[@KristofferEk]

I think the biggest trouble for the osprey wasn't so much parents who didn't want it out seeing as it as an "advanced" technic set for 16+ ages but rather the Afol community as the small 16 tooth gears (I think they are 16 tooth the smallest gears Lego makes) striped in the gear box to spin the rotors. Also what about the Lego city sets the stunt planes and race planes respectively.

[@danielshin4526]

The smallest gear is the 8-tooth

[@joaoonda]

😀

[@joaoonda]

They are presented on my other videos 😀

[@sinisterisrandom8537]

I wouldn't say the Futuristic flyer is based on the plane from Ace Combat rather it took more design looks from the Prototype X-29

[@pongkhaicha5551]

or SU-47

[@Heavygamingreal]

Or the Strike Wyvern

[@somehotmeal8823]

It's wings are mostly based on the adfx shinden and the fuselage of the xfa 27

[@CrayonEater255]

I thought it was Su-47 inspired

[@joaoonda]

Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=bdgxvyo5ql3pSf5g

[@3in_baum903]

As far as I heard the V-22 wasn't not released beacause of just being a military "helicopter", but because it actually had the cooperation with Bell/Boing which are Armor factorys and in the Lego AGB stands that they don't wanna support those people. Another unofficial reason was the motor. When using those motors a few times the gearwheel often broke and had to be replaced, what they obviously woundn't let be sold like this.

[@michaelkeaton5394]

thank you, finally someone with some comon sens!!!

[@joaoonda]

I wonder if lego will release metal parts to replace those parts that suffer excessive damage overtime

[@米空軍パイロット]

At 2:20, that's gotta be an SB2C. The curved tail design is a signature of Curtiss.

[@joaoonda]

Some say that it looks like the Dauntless too. It seems to me that its an easily adaptable design to many WW2 US NAVY designs. Its a great set, the only problem are the colours

[@RichardFStripeRendezvous]

I agree, it's definitely a either a Helldiver, a Dauntless, or a hybrid of the two. It's way too big my minifig standards to be a fighter and has a two place cockpit

[@schifflein9103]

Looks kinda like an F4F to me

[@floyvlogs1754]

It also gives me T-6 Texan vibes, as the Texan doesn't have a 'gull wing' (bent wing like the F4U) and it was a 2-seater trainer for dive bomber aircraft.

[@janhes141]

@@RichardFStripeRendezvous Yeah, it definitely is more resemblent of a US navy dive bomber, I remember when I was like 12 and had this set, I was obsessed with the Pacific war, so I just threw away the rear part of canopy and put a twin machine gun I made there instead, and even made a launching system for the bomb (and the bomb itself), similar to what Stuka had, so the bomb wouldnt damage the propeller.

[@barnykirashi]

1:58 The Focke-Wulf Ta-154 Moskito actually had an engine like that. It was an inverted V engine, with a round cowling to fit the radiators around the shaft, which resembles a radial engine. Pretty common in german plane design. (see: Junkers Ju-88, Junkers Ju-288, Focke-Wulf FW-190D series, Heinkel He-219, Focke-Wulf Ta-152) Except the Ta-154 is a High-Wing Monoplane design

[@joaoonda]

Indeed, it could be based on the Ta-154 with a few modifications. That would explain the exaust pipes. Thank you for your comment!

[@arturoquintanilla5607]

It also reminds me a lot of the Ju 88

[@jsplicer9]

Nice Hungarian armor roundel

[@joaoonda]

@@jsplicer9 indeed!

[@NareshSinghOctagon]

It's always the boomer parents ruining the greatest things. If not them,it's the brats who are far too young at the time the parents aren't watching. And it's such a smooth looking Technic set too...

[@michaelkeaton5394]

The v22 was retired because part of the profit from the set would've went to the millitary part of boeing that make the v22 osprey, so by buying the lego set you would've funded the war efforst of the US, it seems normal anyone wouldn't want to do that through a toy brand, use your brain...

[@projectx7453]

Ikr

[@NareshSinghOctagon]

@@michaelkeaton5394 ,and you think the Americans wouldn't want to do that?

[@michaelkeaton5394]

@@NareshSinghOctagonI'm a french consumer i don't want to fund the USA's war effort. Lego is a danish company and does not only sell lego in america, and even if it did, i'm sure not every one would be stoke to have toy that fund war. the USA do whatever they want with their insane cult of war but they better not impose it on the rest of the world, i would've baught the lego osprey if it was not for the gear malfunction and the boeing partnership

[@joaoonda]

Well, Lego sold the Boeing 787 so they technically funded Boeing...

[@dannypipewrench533]

2:35 MY DAD HAS BEEN WATCHING TOPGUN NONSTOP. I KNEW THAT WAS AN F-14 THE MOMENT I SAW IT. I figured there would be reference to that the moment I began typing.

[@joaoonda]

Lol. Its one of the most beautiful planes ever made

[@Klombo114]

Same!

[@RayShadow278]

The XFA-22 doesn't have forward swept wings, plus it is proportionally way larger than the futuristic flier. It is more likely for it to be based on the Grumman X-29 but with 2 tails instead of 1

[@cbspock1701]

I was thinking of the X-29 as well

[@t65bx25]

If we're going real-world, the Berkut is way closer.

[@ruskiwaffle1991]

I like to think of it as the talon fighter from "stealth"

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@joaoonda]

@@t65bx25 It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@hikton7293]

The super soarer (this one at 4:31) is in my eyes also heavily based on the F-14 Tomcat, considering it got some designfeatures that are very simelar, like the twin engines, tandem cockpit, variable sweept wings, giant elevators, flat fuselage and twin rudders. Only thing I feel is missing is more spread out exhaustes, angled engine intakes, and the fuselage underneeth the cockpit should've been elevated. But it's obvious that they couldn't include such features both to keep it less simelar to the original, but also since those features might compromise the other features considering it's at such a small scale

[@t65bx25]

The older Super Soarer (yellow one) is a single-tailed F-15

[@joaoonda]

At the time I didnt know it had variable swept wings... now I can see that its indeed an F-14

[@joaoonda]

Could be, yes

[@aidan4472]

3:45 the specifics I saw was that the gearbox was shoddy, and would either wear out the gears or the motor.

[@joaoonda]

True, I've heard that. But when that happens, LEGO prefers to just release the set and send replacing parts to fix the issue. Otherwise, they could have just open the boxes, fix the issue and re-release it if they didnt have any problems with the set. The boxes were already produced anyway

[@scpfoundation8376]

Let’s just keep in mind that Lego cancelled the V-22 (Cargo/Transport aircraft) because military, but that didn’t stop them from releasing MANY sets that involved Chinnok Twin blade choppers. Not to mention that one sky police set with a helicopter that clearly looks like a Bell AH-1 Cobra Attack chopper.

[@liker3264]

are you are “drevniy ukr”? abo saloyed

[@joaoonda]

True

[@iceilator]

0:57 is definitely more based on something like the A-26 Invader

[@Nivaroniko]

Maybe the b-26 as it looks like there are less turrets on the top?

[@joaoonda]

Could be. Or the A-20 Boston

[@tommotos463]

Its more like a A-20 havoc

[@squirreltamer2548]

1:23 That set is actually based on the Grumman X-29 forward swept wing prototype. It was an experimental aircraft testbed for hypermanuverability.

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@danielsanhueza1490]

and a sukhoy su 47 bekut

[@coffeeinhandproductions3238]

Interesting comparisons. Some of those larger 3 in one creator sets were nearly spot on yet with no outcry as they were colorful, and marketed as I guess air show jets. Just going to add City has hand a handful of twin rotor helicopters guised up as police transports though number one for me is the twin rotor from the most recent standalone Black Widow set which isn't even disguised for what it obviously is.

[@joaoonda]

True. Its featured on my part 2 or part 3 video

[@sscchhnert]

I think the set at 1:25 is more likely to be based off the soechoj soe-47 jet

[@notsasuke22222]

Sukhoi*

[@sscchhnert]

Sure

[@ultrablade9182]

yeah i think so too

[@polakrodak8538]

That's not how "russian" language works

[@joaoonda]

Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=bdgxvyo5ql3pSf5g

[@samschellhase8831]

I feel like some of these are just the most famous versions of these. There are multiple types of tandem rotor helicopters, I don’t think it was necessarily based off the chinook. And the Technic V-22 controversy was because it’s an active military plane, and usually LEGO tries to stay away from active military sets, to at least appear neutral and not favoring one or another military. Makes sense commercially.

[@joaoonda]

So which one could it be? There aren't that many tandem rotor helicopters

[@sandermur5613]

i feel like the futuristic fighter fits more to the look of the Su-47 Berkut rather than the XFA-27 Scarface from ace combat.

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@reapertalon]

1:30 actually the Futuristic Flyer set is loosely based on the Grumman X-29, an experimental nasal aircraft designed to test forward swept wings. It was based on the airframe of a f5 tiger

[@joaoonda]

Its all explained here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@AerospaceMatt]

The Blue Power Jet is actually a kitbash of the F-35 which you showed and the F-22. It’s got some features from the F-22 incorporated into the design if you look closely enough (including Elevator shape and Vertical stabilizer shape/diagonal angle.)

[@joaoonda]

True, its a mix of the two

[@Cykaa226]

I think the plane on 0:55 looks more like a Douglas A-26, i really cant see where you got the resemblance with the ro57

[@joaoonda]

It does have a certain resemblance to the Ro-57 but it could also be the A-26 or the A-20 Havoc

[@zachboyd4749]

2:21 With the design of the tail, the twin seat cockpit, and the way the gear folds up, I thought that plane more resembles the Curtiss SB2C Helldiver dive bomber.

[@zenturion25]

that was the coment i was searching for :-)

[@joaoonda]

Or the Dauntless

[@zachboyd4749]

@@joaoonda I don't see it, the SBD's tail isn't that big when compared to the rest of the airframe. The SB2C's is. There are also small design features that definitely more resemble the Helldiver rather than the Dauntless, such as the fact that the cockpit isn't that far back from the nose on the Dauntless. Put the two side by side and you can see the design differences between them.

[@joaoonda]

@@zachboyd4749 sure, it could be the Helldiver. it´s an option too.

[@inmatureopinion.]

I don't understand why there isn't more military sets,it doesn't make kids violent,it give them what they want really,because imagine you're having a lego dogfight,how cool is it to be able to chip off pieces as the fight goes on

[@joaoonda]

Indeed! But with the Wook culture currently amongst us, its really difficult to release military sets.

[@inmatureopinion.]

True, but bro, it's been almost a year since I made this comment 💀

[@mammutMK2]

Lego not selling military sets...cobi: hold my beer

[@joaoonda]

And they are getting lots of money 😀

[@DahanLiam]

LEGO INDIANA JONES 7193 there is 1:1 replica of an P-2 air plane (Pilatus P-2 was a Swiss military training airplane used for fighter pilot training in the Nazi Luftwaffe.) and a 1:1 replica of The D-EKVY ( This airplane was a German military airplane designed for reconnaissance and defense.)

[@joaoonda]

Indeed.

[@greebland]

The military isn't all violent, for example, you can be an engineer, a teacher (instructor), a doctor (medic), hell, you can even be a plumber.

[@michaelkeaton5394]

yea because all of these job do not participate in helping the war effort...

[@greebland]

@@michaelkeaton5394 this is me saying that the military isn't completely violent.. not that those jobs are supposed to help in such "war"

[@chinookh4713]

@@michaelkeaton5394 Militaries aren't just for fight the USCG for example does rescues the USMC National Guard Navy and Army all have done disaster relief so their not just for war

[@joaoonda]

True, you're right. The mission of the military is to protect its people and the Nation

[@joaoonda]

Indeed! 😀👍

[@danny_boi3537]

The 60103 airshow set has one plane very similar to the F/A-18 Hornet, though it's a single seater. It also has one that might be based off the Eurofighter Typhoon. (Edit) The second one looks more like the Rafale fighter, now that I see it again

[@TacticalBaguette]

Hornet has both 2 seater and single seater variants so it's still relatively accurate in that regard

[@joaoonda]

They are featured on my part 3 or 4 video

[@joaoonda]

Indeed

[@sonicguyver7445]

The Blue Power Jet is still awesome. I got it used years ago and love it. I just want to know how to do those missile builds under the grey one seen here. I have seen those images for years but can't figure out how to do the missiles. But this is pretty cool in general, seeing all the historical and modern planes that inspired these Lego sets. I think they are more interesting seeing their real-life inspiration.

[@joaoonda]

Indeed. There's picture of that mod on Flickr I think

[@StenWasTaken]

The first plane is actually based of the F-A/18F Super Hornet too I think, due to it being a two seater

[@joaoonda]

This plane is completely different from the Super Hornet.

[@acekiller502]

The aviation adventures set 31011 is probably more based off of the dauntless from WWII. Edit: set 31086 also looks like an su47

[@joaoonda]

Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=zwEFrcz2gqe6ins0

[@BufferThunder]

The Futuristic flyer set is most likely based of the Su-47

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@Commander_Wolffe]

2:23- I agree, but I think that it looks more lika an SBD-3 Dauntless

[@samuelsnowdon2271]

nah more like the p47

[@TheStig_TG]

It's way to thick and big,

[@samuelsnowdon2271]

@@TheStig_TG exactly its a p47 agreed?

[@joaoonda]

Could be. Its easy to modify it into the Dauntless

[@joaoonda]

Could be both actually. Its a two seater, so...

[@BarnieDaDinosaur]

0:29 no its actually based on the f-22 raptor not the f-35 lightning. If you look up a picture of the f-22 and f-35 you can tell it looks more like the f-22.

[@joaoonda]

With Vtol engines? And a single rear engine?

[@ViperZero523]

0:21 seems to be a 2 seater f-22

[@joaoonda]

With a single Vtol engine instead of two rear engines? Thing is, most likely its a F-22 on the front with a Vtol engine at the rear I think...

[@ViperZero523]

​@@joaoonda everything except the VTOL and the 2 seater is F-22A, engine might be F-35B and the cockpit is either F-14A or F/A-18F. I suspect the engine is like that for copyright reasons and the fact of the thrust vectoring nozzles on the F-22A are very weird

[@AlemaumZ]

The Lego 31039 Blue power jet is a Japanese project called X-2 Shinshin.

[@joaoonda]

The only problem is that the X-2 is a twin jet engine design while the Blue Power only has one main engine (plus a Vtol engine like the F-35B).

[@gm_mallparking]

"Military toys make kids violent" PROCEEDS TO MAKE A GIANT AT AT ROBOT AND A BALL THAT CAN DESTROY A PLANET USING LASER.

[@joaoonda]

Indeed. Lego managers are a bunch of hypocrites

[@gm_mallparking]

@@joaoonda i agree

[@mihailos8701]

As a Lego fan, I can confirm that Lego is practically ok with everything that's practically violent military things, as long as they are non-realistic equivalent, which I do agree is kinda sad

[@cybercat7851]

The Futurisitc flyer is almost certainly based on the Sukhoi SU-47, although I do appreciate the AC7 nod.

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@ΜιλτιαδηςΜπομπορης]

could you do a documentary about the Greek battleship averof .

[@joaoonda]

I would love to! I might visit Greece next year and I'm planning a tour to the ship and I will make a short documentary after that visit :D

[@ΜιλτιαδηςΜπομπορης]

Great. Thank you

[@Phoenix44th]

1:23 correction its a su 47

[@TheStig_TG]

More X-29

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@SamuelHaydenUAC]

The set 42113 give me a flashback to Toa Phantoka Pohatu

[@joaoonda]

😀

[@troutwarrior6735]

And this is where cobi comes in. Seriously, their sets are great.

[@joaoonda]

I like them too; the only thing I hate is their landing gears, they don´t fit on the wings so they hang under them. A bit clumsy looking

[@kabob0077]

3:36 I wonder how much the branding cost for this set?

[@joaoonda]

Well, it did help increase the price of the few sets that managed to be sold... 😅

[@ragemonster4277]

Although it is disappointing, I do respect Lego’s decision. The only problem was the osprey technic set was that Lego made a license agreement with Bel Boeing which is in fact a military contractor and that can get into some nasty political stuff for Lego’s behalf real fast since Boeing would be profiting from this. Historically speaking, military contractors are not good people

[@joaoonda]

Recently I read that the set actually have a major mechanical flaw and LEGO used the whole "Public Outcry" as an excuse to remove the sets before they were sold with a defect. Not sure if it´s true but there are a series of videos on youtube about that mechanical issue.

[@ragemonster4277]

@@joaoonda I’ve looked deeper into those “mechanical failures” and actually there isn’t really a problem if people aren’t playing with the propellers while functioning. If I am being honest there are a lot of other sets in the past where this can happen like for example if someone keeps forcing down a digger arm that is powered by screw gears, the gears would start chipping or if a hydraulic keeps reaching its move limit with motor and the user just keeps letting it click away for more than several seconds. The large tow truck from the early 2000s has a model b that used the buggy motor for functions and it would be strong enough to destroy the gears if misused

[@joaoonda]

@@ragemonster4277 I see, thank you for the explanation. So it seems that it was probably a combination of those two factors that led to the removable of that set.

[@ragemonster4277]

@@joaoonda that’s what I think so but I believe that Lego really had no realization of the mechanical problem as I think that was discovered a while later from forums that began to gain trend just like the Land Rover cracking differential issue where users would build the engine wrong because the instructions did not specifically to align the diffs that shared the same axle

[@joaoonda]

@@ragemonster4277 Well, at this point everyone is already used to receive updates to fix the mistakes on their instructions from LEGO. I had that issue for the first time almost ten years ago with the Space Shuttle. Not sure if the solution for the V-22 was easy or not to fix, I will look into that (out of curiosity). 😄

[@majikkskates9084]

The technic V-22 was also pulled because it’s moving mechanisms were breaking the gears inside

[@joaoonda]

Honestly, I don´t think that was the problem. LEGO has already released sets with problems in the past and they were quick to send parts and instructions to correct those issues; also each set goes through a lengthy period of tests before it´s release... I don´t think they would let it go into the market with that major flaw. However, you could be right and they used the excuse of that Anti-war group to remove the set without any major issues.

[@shimyaa]

the v-22 has two 50 cals on the sides for protection

[@joaoonda]

Again, FOR protection...

[@shimyaa]

@@joaoonda Of course FOR protection...

[@caesar7734]

3:09 You should have also mentioned the minifigure scale 4439 Heavy-Lift Helicopter

[@joaoonda]

It will be featured on my next episode 😄

[@max-mg7gk]

I personally believe that set 31086 resembles the x-29 plane. It's unfortunate that lego canceled the v-22 osprey set.

[@tulip3956]

it also slightly looks like su 47

[@stuka_bly4t102]

I think it remembers more the su 47, but yes, with that inverted wing design it looks also like an x29

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@joaoonda]

@@stuka_bly4t102 It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@f.u.m.o.5669]

0:03 This brought back some memories. I remember building this in my childhood.

[@joaoonda]

Awesome!

[@panzerjagertigerporsche]

0:54 that more reminds me the A-20 Havoc seeing that the wings are high-mounted and not low-mounted

[@joaoonda]

Could be, with a few modificiations, sure

[@hyphencubed]

I'd say set 31086 looks closer to the Su-47.

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@zoltanhorvath7969]

about the set "Propeller Adventures" (no. 7292, shown at 1:47), it also has a fourth model, which is a V-22 Osprey

[@joaoonda]

I didnt know that! Wow, you're right! I shall add it to my next video!

[@M60A3]

The 31086 could be based on the Russian su-47

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@sithlord2225]

I'm a big Ace Combat fanboy, but idk I feel the set at 1:23 is just a Su-47 Berkut's heavy artistic reinterpretation more than anything, I just don't see the angles fit the AC design but rather looks more like a stretched Berkut

[@joaoonda]

Yes, its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=zwEFrcz2gqe6ins0

[@Mr.C_WT]

Lego set 31099 resemble an super stallion helicopter and a a10 warthog its a 3 in 1 set

[@joaoonda]

I dont see the Super Stallion, that one is clearly a EC120 Colibri helicopter.

[@creonape2900]

You may have not looked into it that much however, The Lego technic V 22 Osprey was supposed to be like an RC Type Lego set however one of the gears that was used was a very common gear to be broken which is why it was taken off the shelves and why people were crying after getting the set when one part of the superstructure wasn’t working

[@joaoonda]

I read the two stories. I even read that maybe LEGO used the complaints that it was a military model to remove a failed product before it became an even bigger problem.

[@Veselyi_Porosya]

1:29 Su-47 berkut !!!

[@joaoonda]

Its all explained here on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@pilotgeorge2000]

2:20: that's not a hybrid of the p47 and corsair, that is a near perfect recreation of a Yak-52. The giveaway is the tail. 3:00 while I can see it being an fw190, it appears to be an extra 300 with a radial engine.

[@joaoonda]

For the first example, I dont agree, it has a completly different landing gear. Its closer to the T-6 or the Dauntless. For the second, yes it could be but with those long wings and radial engine its totally rhe Ta-152. For the extra 300 you need to replace the engine, reduce the wings length and modify the landing gear... there are other race planes from lego closer to it

[@boeingthepyroraptor7085]

I find it hilarious that this German peace group complained at Lego for making an osprey Peace Groups be like: Putin invades Ukraine: Understandable have a nice day Lego tries to make an osprey: *Riots*

[@joaoonda]

Really? They weren´t against the Invasion?

[@boeingthepyroraptor7085]

@@joaoonda as far as I know, they couldn’t care less

[@chinookh4713]

@@joaoonda At first Germany slowed it down probably out fear of WWIII and their new Oil pipeline with Russia

[@pearified371]

2:11 no, it's most likely an f-16 because of the egg shaped cockpit, and the f-5 has a sloped cockpit instead.

[@joaoonda]

Its a combination of the two

[@arnfrancistapic761]

Military is a honor not violence

[@arnfrancistapic761]

@Evolt Claw- X maybe they are reffering to warcrimes to US, Germany, Russia etc

[@joaoonda]

True

[@joaoonda]

Indeed

[@joaoonda]

😀

[@silverfortytwo9506]

I'm pretty certain the V-22 set was withdrawn as it tended to strip and destroy its gears, not because it was a military vehicle

[@Supersoldier2012]

I also think

[@LimChingLiang]

Removed because of military aircraft. Lego got complaint from German Peace Society. Official statement, LEGO said: The LEGO Technic Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey was designed to highlight the important role the aircraft plays in search and rescue efforts. While the set clearly depicts how a rescue version of the plane might look, the aircraft is only used by the military. We have a long-standing policy not to create sets which feature real military vehicles, so it has been decided not to proceed with the launch of this product. We appreciate that some fans who were looking forward to this set may be disappointed, but we believe it's important to ensure that we uphold our brand values.

[@joaoonda]

Thank you for your comment 😀

[@joaoonda]

It seems that it was a combination of the two...

[@joaoonda]

I believe it was a combination of the two. They noticed the gear problem but when that happens, normally the set is still released and they sent new parts to fix the issue. Just a few weeks after it was released, someone fixed the problem of the set with just minor parts. To me, it was a combination of the two problems, the gear issue and politics

[@hussainshady]

1:23 thats a su-47 😑😑

[@joaoonda]

Yes, its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=Qk4Xx8VIFwib_kOs

[@liamsoutherland_21]

great video man. gonna watch part 2 now!

[@comet8539]

I think the creator aviation adventures set is based more on the Brewster F2A Buffalo, especially considering that the yellow and blue match the old navy colour scheme at the time and the dimensions are very similar

[@joaoonda]

Could be, its another option. I actually love the Buffalo, it was a great fighter on the hands of the finnish pilots.

[@MrAnimeWolf]

I remember as a kid building a jet that looked like one of the blue angels with the "legos" at my grandmother's house, they were definitely some kind of offbrand legos

[@andreasbader5341]

You mean lego 6331 perharps.. Looks like a F15

[@joaoonda]

😀

[@joaoonda]

😀

[@cybercat7851]

I would say that the Sonic Boom is closer to a Gripen than a Rafale because the Gripen’s air intakes are on the side while the Rafale’s are closer to the bottom.

[@joaoonda]

Sure, it can be

[@betaakey]

Fun Fact the airplane in the thumbnail is the same one my brother was making but couldn’t finish it so I built it up fully

[@joaoonda]

Cool!

[@TUPLsEverywhere]

The Blue Power Jet's side vents and tail resemble that of an F-22, making it sort of a F-35/F-22 hybrid, but other than that pretty accurate.

[@joaoonda]

Yes, it only has one main engine at the rear plus another for vertical take off. So its a hybrid of the two

[@TUPLsEverywhere]

​@@joaoonda Yep. Also, I just noticed that its wings and elevators are also that of the F-22.

[@gbornitz]

The sonic boom jet looks more like a chinese J-8/J-9 rather than a rafale. The rafale has no elevator behind the wing and the air intakes are half way under the fuselage. On the other hand the J-8 has a delta wing (triangular wing shape), elevators with the same shape behind the wing and air intakes at the side of the fuselage like the sonic boom jet. The J-9 (variant of the J-8) has the elevators in front of the wing instead of behind it (canards). The sonic boom jet has elevators in front and behind the wing, which is really rare for a jet.

[@joaoonda]

Men, you went for a really obscure design. How about the Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-8?

[@lucagerulat307]

As far as I know the osprey was retired because of an construction error that would put a lot of stress on a gear and might brake it and that is why it's actually retired.

[@joaoonda]

It now seems that it was a combination of the two

[@Armata6348]

Lost the last bit of interest in Lego when they canceled the V-22. I was so excited for this set.

[@joaoonda]

Same. But you can still buy them... if you have 600eur that you don't need... 😅

[@MTPodcasts54]

The "futuristic flyer" set isn't based off of some video game aircraft. It's based off of the Sukhoi Su-47, which was an experimental Soviet aircraft that never saw service.

[@joaoonda]

Its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=bdgxvyo5ql3pSf5g

[@aidanconnor2274]

I’d say the Blue Power Flier is a mix between the F-22 and the F-35. And the helicopter alternate build is based off of a conceptual rescue helicopter

[@joaoonda]

True, you're right

[@Shifter1238]

The Futuristic Flyer is possibly based off the SU-47 "Berkut" due to the inversed wings

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@Andrew-se4tg]

Awesome video man! More people need to point this stuff out!👍👍👍

[@joaoonda]

Thank you!

[@fthnffwrfrg]

hey on the plane that looks like P-47 or the F4U it kinda looks also like the italyan MC-202 and in this part: 0:56 it also looks like a B-26 thats to our opinion

[@joaoonda]

An MC-202 with a radial engine? Really?

[@fthnffwrfrg]

@@joaoonda that was a while ago now i see it and its no where near how the lego looked

[@swatgaming176]

That's strange. The blue jet you showed in the thumbnail looked like an F-22, but the seating on a real-life F-22 is one seat, so why are there two? You can tell its an F-22 because of its back wing design and its siding is a bit larger right after the cockpit

[@joaoonda]

Well, its a combination of the F-22 with the F-35 but with two seats. This way LEGO evades any legal issues with Lockheed 😅

[@mihailos8701]

Thanks for a good video about a category of sets from one of my most favorite Lego themes :)

[@joaoonda]

Thank you! Glad you like it!

[@camdix3250]

Very nice look back at some lovely LEGO kits. It's interesting that replica models of actual military hardware are considered inappropriate by some people, while models of "superheroes" and their equipment are acceptable. Of course, I am misguided, for superheroes never, ever engage in any forms of violence. :)

[@joaoonda]

I totally agree with you, but what we can do? :D

[@lindametzler8740]

Btw the futuristic flyer is the xb-29

[@joaoonda]

No, it's not. its all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidksi=Qk4Xx8VIFwib_kOs

[@MDD-PRIME]

The Futuristic Flyer could also be partly based on the ADF-11 from AC7 with it's thin wings or the ASF-X Shinden II, also from AC-7

[@joaoonda]

True.... its another option

[@M0zZd]

1:29 this is based off of the SU-47 berkut, with its forward swept wing design 2:12 its an F-16 because its intake is under its fuselage

[@nosferatu7611]

It literally doesn't resemble a Su-47 Lmao, they don't even have any similarities beside the wing design P.S it's an X-29 with XFA's stabilizers

[@M0zZd]

@@nosferatu7611 seems like the X-29 and the SU-47 had a child

[@nosferatu7611]

@@M0zZd which part of the figure that looks like the berkut?

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@TheMemeDynamics]

The futuristic flyer thing looks more like the Su-47 Berkut

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@williamgritton1912]

I think doing a line of creator expert sets based off ww2 and cold War aircraft would be awesome

[@joaoonda]

Indeed!

[@EthanAdey]

1:28 NOOOO It’s actually a SU-47 “Bercut”

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@imjashingyou3461]

The one you said is a cross of the corsair and thunderbolt I would say resembles actually a Helldiver/hellcat

[@joaoonda]

Honestly right I think it looks closer to a Dauntless...

[@val5984]

I can’t remember the set names or set numbers, but there are two discontinued technic planes, one based off what I think is a MiG 23, and the other very clearly an F35, both with drastically different colour schemes from the actual planes however Edit: the mig 23 set number is, or was at the time 9394 and the f34 is 42066, both technic

[@joaoonda]

Hmm, I need to check on that. There's a Tejas fighter but I dont remember a mig-23 technic style fighter. I will look on that

[@val5984]

@@joaoonda check set 9394, bright red very MiG 23 inspired, single engine sweep wing jet. Ur right tho it might not be a MiG 23, it just looks like that to me

[@mr.dangernoodle6294]

I always thought the yellow, blue, and white 3 in 1 Creator plane looked like the Dauntless. I liked it so much that I have three of them.

[@joaoonda]

Could be the T-6G Texan too (I think)

[@yourkermitthefrog2204]

I think the Aviation Adventures set is based on the ww2 us navy dive bomber, Douglas SBD dauntless

[@joaoonda]

It´s possible

[@yourkermitthefrog2204]

@@joaoonda or maybe a P47 thunderbolt

[@joaoonda]

@@yourkermitthefrog2204 thats what I said, a combination of the Thunderbolt with the Corsair ... and the cockpit of the SBD.... so in the end its sorta a T-6G Texan... maybe

[@ToyotaTacomaOfficial]

I wish Lego could just make the sets with the actual colors and names without parents getting offended because these are all really cool and I would probably want them of I were younger

[@joaoonda]

You can still buy them! Why only play when you are a kid? 😀

[@DistanceNsVeterans]

Just like the Train with the blue and red and white and black strips that Was based on the Amtrak phase 3 scheme (amtrak which is a passenger rail company

[@joaoonda]

Yes, but that is a civilian vehicle. I think the situation is different 😅

[@DistanceNsVeterans]

@@joaoonda Reference Wise

[@joaoonda]

@@DistanceNsVeterans true, you're right

[@f1ltitanic]

You forget to add Sopwith camel(3451 old 10226 new and 40049 mini version) This is small replica of ww1 fighter plane with same name

[@joaoonda]

Yes, but that's not a disguised aircraft, its an adaptation of a real design

[@ministig63ace]

you forgot to mention the hidden build for the 7292 set, which also resembles a v22 osprey

[@joaoonda]

Its in another video. I didn't have room for all of them

[@The1austrian]

the futuristic flyer actually looks like the su47, what was a soviet forward-swept-wing prototype aricraft what never entered service

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@Sapphiresoul2]

The one at 1:26 seems to look more like an SU-47, or the G9 Eclipse from Just Cause 2

[@joaoonda]

It´s all explained on my latest video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJzcoHZ9hchnidk

[@Minnow_mann]

Theres also one called Propeller plane and the second one looks eerily similar tho the A-10 Thunderbolt

[@joaoonda]

You're right, I'm going to feature that one on my Part 2 video. :)

[@Minnow_mann]

@@joaoonda Also Lego creator set 31047 has a red Apache