Jodi Arias opening statements from penalty phase

[@keithcitizen4855]

Flores had a smile on his face knowing he had rock solid evidence, one cool guy -

[@sarahholt5575]

Idk how the court reporter can keep all of this straight. He was in so many days of this trial & HES AMAZING!!

[@dragonsky799]

@Saturn V How do they do it? I'm genuinely asking. It seems like an impossible task!

[@spiritwalker9903]

@Saturn V stenography machine

[@felicianarvaez205]

Shots out to the court reporter I mean the calligrapher

[@imluvinyourmum]

Interesting ppl are still posting new comments on this trial,it’s a blast from the past for me but Jodi taught me a lot about female emotional manipulation.

[@JesusDuran-h3y]

Thats Mike! Hes the real Rockstar of the trial!! He had to type out every disgusting word Hodi said in court and on the sex tape!

[@doreensantos5069]

Juan Martinez and Detective Florez did everything they could. I'm sure the Alexander Family are so very proud of them and love them as most of us that watched both trials do.

[@taradactule6052]

I love that they stay in touch and are friends now...and when detective Flores's son passed juan put a little memorial to him in his book..it was so sweet..hearing Juan say how much respect he had for the good detective made me smile.

[@stellaboulton9531]

2 wonderful men.

[@tonysangster7383]

@@stellaboulton9531 Stella !! did you hear Jodi Arias sister has married her nephew? I dont know whether to believe it. That makes her niece & nephew also her grand niece & nephew doesnt it?? OMG - hope its not true...

[@tonysangster7383]

@Michelle Villamagna agree w you....felt so bad for him having to sit there ,at that time, listening to that BS when he's suffering one of the worst tragedies a parent can suffer. But he did it & he did it w dignity & class. Am sure the Alexander family were there for him & supported him fully - after all, theyre the ones closest to really understanding what he was going thru...

[@JJ-vb9ct]

Guys I don’t know what you’re talking about. The family wanted the death penalty and even at their statement at the trial they expressed their disappointment in how the law has failed them. This was a fail. The family wanted the death penalty not life in prison. The prosecution failed to get that, so not that amazing nor flawless 🤷🏻‍♀️ it’s sad that the family didn’t get what they wanted

[@robingagan6288]

Good work by this guy who lightened the photo...it was an important piece of evidence

[@sidviscus]

It's ridiculously annoying how many times the defense tried to interrupt and call for mistrial. I really hate it when a defense has clearly lost a case so they try to get a mistrial because they want another chance to win. Your client is guilty of murder. Convicted. Just shut up and let them receive the punishment they deserve, you're done.

[@gabster-ie1vj]

Just like in closing, Mr.Martinez. stated ,when you have the truth the facts and the law on your side,that's what you argue.. when none of this is on your side 'you just argue'... that's not verbatim but you get the point.. .

[@imluvinyourmum]

You have never dealt with a lawyer have you haha, it’s either no win no pay (they get 90% of the settlement to go away) or they clock as many hours as possible and charge you for it. To represent yourself requires 100’s to 1000’s of hours depending and they cash in on that fact.

[@thelmadickinson6811]

@@imluvinyourmumthis case wasn’t a settlement case. He was a public defender. He even quit the PD office to try to get removed from her case and the DA wouldn’t allow it. He got paid the PD going rate.

[@thelmadickinson6811]

Nurmi tried every way possible to get removed from her case. She was as difficult as a client as she was in the stand. She even tried to represent herself once and he thought that was his out. But she got her ass handed to her in a motion hearing and she asked for her attys back. A death penalty case public defender has to put on the defense that the client wants. They cannot put on the defense that is viable and realistic. Nurmi knew she was full of crap but it was his duty to the constitution that he see that’s her rights in trial we’re not trampled on. As you will see, sometimes the judge sustains his objections. Mostly overruled but not always. He knew she would be found guilty.

[@ryancalhoun2910]

This is easily the dumbest comment I've ever read. It's literally the defense's job to fight for their client at every turn.

[@dayalcober89]

If the defense lawyer can object to the weather, he will.

[@KamalShariff]

It's a tactic lawers use to throw you off balance. Martinez gets right back on track tho.

[@annieoops6243]

He was so much worse in the retrial too..literally every sentence he objected..the judge and everyone was getting so over it.

[@rubymarshall3367]

U

[@victoryforever1915]

Yep

[@felicianarvaez205]

Lol

[@rebeccatracey9066]

The sound of Nurmi and Wilmots voices are incredibly annoying. He whined "objection your honour, move to strike" so many times We know she did it, she admitted she did it, she's admitted to lying to everyone .... "Wormi" .....Shut up and let Martinez continue being brilliant!!

[@KrzNena]

Wormi 😂

[@pommiebears]

I was married, had two children, and a mortgage, at 27 years old. That age is no mitigating factor. She had no mitigating factors.

[@michellefucoff4631]

who cares what you had

[@stellaboulton9531]

Well said Pommie Bears. It's called taking responsibility for your life and doing the right thing. - something arias has not managed to do.

[@pommiebears]

Michelle Jones you do. Enough to comment anyway. Lol. What a bloody idiot 😂!

[@pommiebears]

stella boulton thank you. That was the point I was making....obviously some just don’t get it.

[@susangreen3002]

@@michellefucoff4631 jealous much 🐷🤣 probably just like your girlfriend jodi arias high school dropout no career pathological lying pyscho

[@hvdsyt]

A very sad state of affairs for the judicial system. A juror, who knows, in advance, that she is against the death penalty, which is provide for by law, has no business sitting on the jury without advising the Court that she ALREADY had her mind made up prior to the "penalty phase". She should be held in contempt of court. This case was a "prime" case why the death penalty if provided for by law, and furthermore, her actions show clearly why she should have gotten the ultimate penalty, otherwise, there is no reason at all to have it on the "books" at all. A circus of what a murder trial should be, since it has been over 6 years, YES, 6 years, and at great cost to the people of the Country. A lot of other CONVICTED people have received the death penalty based on a lot less "factors and evidence" but this case seems to be a reflection on our times, and is scary as to how the Country and future Court proceedings will be handled!! I hope that "juror" is happy with herself and her actions and can sleep well, knowing that she herself, broke the law, and has now allowed this un-repentant killer to go on living and having a life until the days she dies of natural causes!! Disgusting and so very sad!! How much pre-meditation does it take, and when will the Judges be held accountable for allowing the "circus" to go on and on and on!!

[@531katie]

Except she didn't say or indicate that her verdict was based on what she's against. Supposedly it was based on the case as it was laid out before her. One of the rules in the justice system is unanimous consent in both the verdict and the sentence. I would be very happy to review the 2nd part--just to eliminate the political influence and from either side--someone's who's unable to put a defendant to death as well as a vindictive revengeful person who's looking to put someone to death. The guilty vs not guilty phase is less vulnerable to political influence plus the emphasis is always on the side of innocence for a good reason. Too many people were being crushed by the power of the state. The presumption of innocence differentiates us from 3rd world countries where 'the state' can strong arm any weaker link in society to their death, figuratively or otherwise. But in the penalty phase, if a majority on the jury see sufficient cause under its state's own laws (ie death penalty still being a choice therefore not subject to political opinion or the next Election Day -- personally I'd move if I disagreed so much. Certainly not stand on a jury where id be asked to carry out the law or disobey the law...) to put a guilty person to death, then that should be sufficient. And no 'mistrial' otherwise-- straight to the sentence of death row or to serve a life sentence period. No costly retrial that prolongs family agony and drains the tax payer... For what ends? That's how I would change the laws, and some need to be changed. Some will never change but this could without disrupting our fundamental cause that a defendant has rights but victims have rights and tax payers have rights. And no political hack is going to circumvent the rules to serve on a jury and refuse to hear evidence. But in this case that's not what juror #17 did. You can't pick and choose who to believe. One man on the jury says she refused to deliberate while others denied this but said she made up her mind based on what she observed in court. Nobody should be subjected to the abuse that this juror is taking. Nobody! She owes you and me and the state absolutely nothing. She spent as much time as the other jurors and sacrificed just as much. Deliberating doesn't have to be a verbal contest - it can go on inside her mind, and just because you can't see the workings and I can't see it doesn't mean there's no deliberating going on. Don't you think that if this were the case that most members of that jury would have demanded of the judge to replace her? I'd like to believe that if only one felt strongly about what a juror lacked, then that's more about his arrogance than about a disgraced juror. Yes some others weren't quite sure and leaned towards the same accusation. But it wasn't enough for this judge to intervene and follow one juror's demands. I'd have wished to judge had in fact relieved this juror and then spared her from what she's being accused of now. It was wrong of that juror to repeat his personal feelings or maybe it wasn't wrong but it was singular and selfish and he out her life at risk. The mob mentality out there is scary and ugly. This judge irked me by allowing antics like defense objections every 4 sentences during Juan's opening statement. I was told she lets the lawyers put their cars on without trying to be in control like some judges. The reason to change the penalty phase rule from unanimous to a majority? To spare the courts but also the human beings who hold out bravely and then are skewered by the public afterwards.

[@531katie]

CORRECTION (as if the entire world is even listening .. Lol). 'Put on their case (CASE) ... Not cars. Spellcheck is a pest sometimes. Proof reading probably a better idea.

[@joannerutledge1377]

and the woman who didnt believe in the death penalty,her ex husband was locked up 15 years ago,an who was the prosecutor,juan martinez. ummmmm.

[@taradactule6052]

@@joannerutledge1377 exactly..she should be in trouble for that alone but she "forgot" about it she said...and she deliberately lied in the interview..she told the courts she could in fact vote for death but when it came to deliberations she sat in the corner with her arms crossed whining that she didnt believe in the death penalty and the other jurors ask her what would be worthy of a death penalty to her and she said nothing because she didnt believe in it...so she probably had an agenda...honestly I am not mad Jodi got life without parole because the biggest punishment to her will be the day she is no longer relevant..everyone forgets her and moves along to the next case...no more men putting money on her books...no more special treatment for the twat waffle..she will be a number called out to be bossed around..that's the ultimate punishment for the likes of her..of course we will all come back to watch Juan own the courtroom but she gets no acknowledgement that she knows of from that so lol

[@joannerutledge1377]

@@taradactule6052 you are right,but theres been a movie about her,men send her lots of money,she is able to have people that she dosent know visit her,in one day she had 20,and 2 of them were school girls,the women are ment to have only 1 a day for 20 minutes,but i know what you mean no more tv interviews haha.

[@emmisu9724]

Florez is looking mighty good! A gentleman! ❤️ Thankyou for your good work sir! ❤️

[@assistanttotheregionalmana349]

Yes he is a fine lookin fella for sure!!

[@dragonsky799]

What? Lol

[@jodij6280]

I want Juan's full opening and closing. I couldn't care less about Nurmi or Wilmott. Their voices are like nails on a chalkboard.

[@sumilvan]

KZbin channels Addicted 2 trialz and LadyJustice2188 also have video of the start of Arias retrial.

[@rexoates4484]

+Jodi J I call them Kirk Boreme and Jennifer Wilnut. lol

[@jodij6280]

Rex Oates I was being nice. During the trials, I called them Nurmnut and Wilma.

[@Fee212]

Oh that would have been wonderful. I don't know how Juan kept his temper at all the rediculous Nurmi slug's objections. He's already shouting, 'mistrial!' And Juan the human firecracker has only begun his opening. Aaaarrrrgggg...... maddening!!!

[@taradactule6052]

I call them.. Nurmnuts Willnut Alyce lie a lot Dr buy a book for tha booty samuels lol Dr get not fer

[@whodat7084]

Juan: “She lied to police officers” Wormi: “objection. Motion for mistrial” Wtaf

[@kazellejohnson3819]

He wanted to get offff this so bad

[@spiritwalker9903]

AND.... every word to the jury was a lie. Baffling..

[@whodat7084]

@@spiritwalker9903 😂😂😂

[@spiritwalker9903]

@@whodat7084 poor pathetic wormi.. he wasn't even embarrassed that his books came in several parts...who does that!!!

[@dragonsky799]

@@spiritwalker9903 He never wanted this case. It was forced on him, and when he wanted off of it he was refused. Give the dude a break. This case ruined his life, and it wasn't his fault. He did the best he could.

[@novascotiaskater1868]

2:37 Nurmi - “ Objection your Honor…argumentative….move to strike! Move for mistrial !” LoL wtf? He asked for a mistrial because Martinez stated Travis was 30? I love it when Nurmi objects and says “ move to strike” with such confidence and loud voice and JSS just says “ over ruled…” it’s incredibly satisfying.

[@_labacanitaz]

I love knowing you're rewatching along with me LOL I love all your other comments I would actually be really interested in talking with you and have a binge rewatch session through msgnr or email PLEASE 🙏🏽 😅 LOL But only if you're comfortable

[@_labacanitaz]

I've never had someone to talk to about this trial , either of them. So only if you're comfortable & interested. I love hearing your other comments so I know we'd get a lot said. Lemme know 🙏🏽 😊💙

[@miraclemcclure2496]

Please post more of the trial!

[@strictlycasual765]

They won’t have any more of it, there was a ban of cameras in the courtroom I think imposed after this day but then lifted but only after the trial or midway through so the only footage to my knowledge is the grainy stuff with bad audio which is online already

[@muchsunshine6037]

Nurmi and Arias deserve each other.

[@vintageworks2805]

Wormi looked very infatuated with hodi indeed

[@joeymcallister8033]

Much Sunshine nurmi couldn’t stand JA and tried from day 1 to get off the case and they wouldn’t let him off. Jodi drove him crazy - he wrote a book called “Trapped with Ms. Arias” for a reason!

[@pommiebears]

VINTAGE WORKS how wrong you are. He detests Jodi Arias and was forced, yes....FORCED, to defend her. Nurmi did the job of a defence attorney. He handed in his license to practice law shortly after this case. Arias was going to sue him for writing a book about being forced to defend her and how disgraceful she is. It’s a decent book.

[@vintageworks2805]

@@pommiebears him handing over his job. Still does not excuse what n how he acted in that court room he can piss n moan now but it will never justify what he did he could have done his job in a classy way

[@metroguy4879]

He’s just doing his job This country affords you defense ( somebody had to defend her💯

[@Fee212]

Nurmi asks dozens of questions that are mind-numbingly nothing to do with the crime. Then asks only one with something to do with the case. He is so stupid to ignore the fact that bored jurors will resent all his time-wasting.

[@ashleymcmeakin9986]

Sooo....younger people watching this be forewarned: don't use the opposite sex for SEX. Especially if you find yourself referring to the person as a SCARY OBSESSED STALKER to your friends. I truly believe people underestimate what other humans are capable of. Poor Travis learned the hard way. This was completely premeditated and still there's no explanation besides he was moving on. Travis was stabbed over 30x, his throat was slit so deeply it revealed his spine and was 3 to 4 inches deep ear to ear and shot in head all while conscious. Please take my word for it and do not google the autopsy photos. I was and have been scarred for life.

[@RB-pm2ni]

Casual sex can create strange primal emotions, she got used one too many times and cracked

[@lauraburger1272]

What’s with the cross hairs and frame on this video? I’m not watching a video with this on the screen.

[@catface3473]

So...to be a lawyer...I must learn to say...objection..move to strike...motion for mistrial...arguementitve...and approach...!can I get paid now..please.

[@neraK4188]

Objections now prevents mistrials later!

[@wadesmith9275]

I have followed many trials since I retired, and this trial was the easiest one that I have ever followed because of the many avenues the defense used including stating that the victim and arias were attacked by intruders which didn't work so the defense chose to use self-defense since the attack story wouldn't work. That was enough for me. The fact that the victim's execution was premeditated and planned to start with the theft of a gun from the killer's grandmother's house which she used to shoot the victim in the head, showed all the elements for her execution. And justice would demand that she be executed.

[@imluvinyourmum]

She got life. It’s actually worse, because you get to see the outside world move on without you.

[@HappyEnuff]

As if the judge is going to say "yes Mr Nurmi, motion for mistrial granted, the State asked and answered a question". What a dil.

[@upplsuckimcool16]

When was this part? I just watched the entire trial including the penalty opening statements yet this is different. I'm absolutely lost.

[@dreadiganci3660]

does Nurmi say only objection argumenative, move to strike.... mistrial. Speaking louder too because of wanting to act like Juan Martinez.

[@tonysangster7383]

it is ALL he can do....he cant run a viable defense, he cant impeach the states witnesses, although he tries to...he only ends up driving home the exact point he didnt want to make, it is ALL he can do. When Juan makes his closing argument KN interrupts,interupts ,interrupts, trying to throw Juan off his points....he doesnt achieve his goal, but he tries. He is not a nice. man & got everything he deserved, he'll never be allowed to practice law again...

[@joeymcallister8033]

Tony Sangster you are unfamiliar with the facts concerning Kirk Nurmi outside the trial.

[@tonysangster7383]

@@joeymcallister8033 No,am not unfamiliar w the facts about KN outside of the trial, nor during the trial, nor before the trial. Thanks

[@joeymcallister8033]

Tony Sangster then why comment on it?

[@tonysangster7383]

@@joeymcallister8033 excuse me?....everyone can comment on whatsoever they choose to....even you....& I do not need to justify any of my comments to you. have a nice day

[@patriciatreslove146]

Nurmi does my head in, and he thinks he did a good job.

[@SuperKaren1953]

Nurmi makes me sick.

[@tonysangster7383]

Nurmi is disgusting I WILL NOT BUY HIS BOOK!!

@@tonysangster7383 he's interesting. He didn't want this case and tried to be released. I didn't like him during this trial, but if you watch interviews after the fact you might have a different opinion. I disliked all the objections from WillNOT and Nurmi. She was guilty and this case only needed one day to convict.

[@tonysangster7383]

@@correawi What is an "academic defense" please?

[@vintageworks2805]

Nurmi nurmi nurmi all this cuz u had a crush on hodi u took this trial and hodi very personal in my opinion ive never seen attorneys treat there client as so in my life .she fired ur ass now u want to act like this never happened all the disresoect from you was uncalled 4 wormi u make me sick 2

[@HopefulInterventions]

Same here! He is disgusting.

[@margaretwilder1055]

Ugghh!!! What's up with sound??

[@MrAndrewthedude]

Jodi sold her soul for that mistrial and that one juror handed her the receipt.

[@HappyEnuff]

Jodi had a soul? Geeez I missed something !!

[@deemitchell7987]

Well said Andrew

[@JessLBreen]

No one should make a eating/drinking game with the Johnny Depp/amber heard trial and Jody Aires trial…everytime in JD/amber case take a bite of food when there is hearsay. And this case with an objection take a shot…. You would be a severly fat alcohol poisoned human being

[@kjh6903]

Those two nut jobs are very similar!!

[@lisakn27]

Do we have to wait until she is sentenced to see the retrial?

[@_labacanitaz]

oooooh. look at our esteemed Det. Flores 😉😘😅😅 i must say , he looks very handsome, very sophisticated with those glasses. 😉😅😊💙

[@JJ-vb9ct]

Haha Det Flores and Imani Dominguez sitting in a tree 😄

[@_labacanitaz]

@@JJ-vb9ct are we K-I-S-S-I-N-G?! 😃😁😁 LOL

[@rebeccatracey9066]

I can't understand how the camera was all over the place taking pictures...can someone offer a quick explanation... her foot, showing her dragging, the ceiling?? How was the camera "with them"??.... The button being pressed in just the right spot?? This is a serious question!

[@KrzNena]

I think the camera might have been tossed around while she was struggling trying to drag Travis and the button might have accidentally went off taking those pictures back to back. Sort of like the ones the paparazzi take. They were into photography so maybe it was one of those types of cameras. That’s my theory. I also believe that if it weren’t for those pictures, she might have gotten away with it.

[@Abracadabra1111]

“Pornography assessor” sounds like a dope job

[@JesusDuran-h3y]

Im here to compare Hodi to Lietecia Stauch!

[@nblick4924]

Jodi obviously was completely overwhelmed by pure rage .... unless your mentally ill ... goodness .... for a woman or a man to do such fatal harm to someone and she clearly completely overpowered him... it’s just unbelievable.. and it’s not evil or demonic.. etc ... its like a build up of emotions within her .. the messed up thing is .. n idc what everyone thinks ... I do think she loved him ... and this will haunt her every single day of her life ... it would be worse to be in prison til the day you die ... u exist but have no life no freedom no authority .. ur nothing ... it’s just mind blowing .. don’t get me wrong.. what she did was horrid beyond belief... but my god... there is so much more to this than we will ever kno or truly understand ....

[@vintageworks2805]

If u study her body hodi is big tall strong her arms hands shoulders

[@HopefulInterventions]

Jodie is evil! Did you even see Travis’s dead body?! She nearly decapitated him,

[@kaymarham5486]

"obviously completely overwhelmed by pure rage." The murder was very carefully planned and there were numerous pre-steps taken to cover her tracks (car rental location, dyed hair, licence plate removal, the gun, the gas cans, the knife, etc.) This was cold blooded.

[@1888.cfc.]

She's a psychopath. She lost control of her subject. As we've seen repeatedly with these cases.. the minute the abuser loses control over their victim they lash out usually with deadly consequences.

[@1888.cfc.]

Only people who deserve a death like that is pd0files. PERIOD. Exactly why stabby tried to manipulate us into thinking Travis was one. We all know he was faaar from it. He loved women too much and he paid for it with his life.

[@craycray507]

is this trial #2?

[@jodiefinney5072]

yes

[@JJ-vb9ct]

Stupid question probably, but aren’t they able to track down the owner of a gun by the bullet shell casing? When you buy your bullets don’t you have to present an ID which then ties you to that ammunition? Or do you buy them like lollipops in the States? 🤷🏻‍♀️

[@jaydonevans9205]

Definitely a stupid question.

[@JJ-vb9ct]

@@jaydonevans9205 😅 okay. I thought it can be traced to the person who bought the ammunition and gun 🤷🏻‍♀️

[@gabster-ie1vj]

Lollipops and poprocks🤣🙈🙉🙊👅

[@CATAZTR0PHE]

Ammunition is not numbered (marked with unique numbers or symbols) so you can't trace it. (If it was then m*rderers would look for shell casings to take them I think)

[@_labacanitaz]

@@gabster-ie1vj oh Jesus , we got enough bad memories from this trial. Don't bring up the grossest ones! 😅 we're traumatized enough , fool 😅💙

[@jeannineroberton4019]

Coughing in the courtroom, so annoying.

[@MelaVictoriaMakeup]

SO just to make sure, there was a 60ish day trial prior to this one in 2013 which ended with a mistrial and this one came after that trial?

[@DaniM3017]

Cecilia Mel yes, this is the second trial.

[@jenmdawg]

This is the penalty trial. She was convicted of murder + premeditation and then faced sentencing. In Arizona, a death penalty case requires a penalty trial. In the first penalty trial the jury was deadlocked (I believe 8-4, for death) and the DA's office opted to re-try the penalty phase. Martinez was fired from the DA's office for allegedly giving away the identity of a holdout juror in the second penalty trial - he wanted the juror to be dismissed so he could win the death penalty. He gave the name of the juror to a woman with whom he was having an affair (she was married), a blogger who was covering the trial. We are all lucky Arias did not get a retrial of the criminal case against her due to his misconduct. He may be disbarred for lying to investigators about it.

[@stellaboulton9531]

@@jenmdawg Not quite as boring as Mr. Nurmi but you're getting there.

[@robertkjames1250]

Cecilia Mel check out Eonblue3 on KZbin ... they have the entire trial coverage .. and this site has the best video and sound

[@jodiefinney5072]

@Hannah Faith unfortunately its true. Heartbreaking for sure, but true.

[@geethebirdnerd]

love him and i must sleep to his interrogation of arias nightly - he has a calming voice

[@Human4Peace]

Same

[@rossimarti]

Where’s Alyce LaViolette? I think she made enough money from the first trial.

[@zuluexmachina2191]

She refused to show up because of the many death threats she received after her bogus testimony.

[@harrydocwalkerharrydocwalk5998]

Jodi has been convicted and sentenced so why all this b......t?

[@jodiefinney5072]

She was convicted during the first trial but the jury was hung with the sentencing. In Arizona they may "re-do" the penalty phase when going for the death penalty. Unfortunately this time was also a hung jury and Judge Stephens ended up handing down her sentence of life without parole.

[@janellesilbs328]

Nermey asks for a mistrial!! He is a disgust!!!!

[@catc1566]

Kirk Nurmi got cancer after this trail. I think it is for trying, which he can not to defend this cold hearted killer with absolute no remorse. If I were in his place I would have quit my job.

[@pommiebears]

C 15 he tried to. They said he had to defend her. He even left the public defenders office and they still made him defend her.

[@susangreen3002]

He says how he wanted off this trial well for someone who wanted off this trial he sure defended stabby any nasty way he could especially the pedophilia then nurmi writes a book and goes on shows trying to defend himself well he quit being a attorney before he was disbarred for 4 years so why didnt he quit when he was defending what he knew was a pathological liar then to add salt to the wounds of not only travis but the Alexander family and that pig stabby should of never been allowed to address the court after the Alexander family because she just went after the Alexander family and it was ABSOLUTELY horrendous maybe karma will pay jodi in prison what she really deserved

[@catc1566]

Yes I know. I felt very bad for him! I'm also a a Christian and that is what put's me at ease. Our life here is a blink. Jodi is going to hell! Very very bad ass place.

[@rdr6269]

@@susangreen3002 If Nurmi didn't do a good enough job Jodi could demand a retrial on the grounds of ineffective counsel. I can't stand him but I think it was in everyone's best interest for him to defend her as well as he could.

[@realmontana6838]

@@pommiebears I don’t believe he really wanted to .. him and WillMott made pretty good money off of this trial man don’t believe the hype

[@rebeccatracey9066]

I just noticed how much weight Nurmi put on.

[@beccawilkes9633]

I disagree. Normally yes 27 years old is not a child, but it IS in little bpd land where you never grow up and you're never in the wrong

[@courtneycampling293]

Is this number one?

[@strictlycasual765]

Trial one? If so then no: trial 2 (penalty phase)

[@karenharris282]

Overrulled

[@catface3473]

I object !!!

[@hectorvalenzuela7952]

Overruled.

[@FoodforThought12345678dsds]

Wow! The typist old guy has lost a lot of weight and has shaved. HOT!

[@chunkpotpie]

FoodforThought 😂

[@FoodforThought12345678dsds]

@Jewels inSD it's my pleasure

[@kaymarham5486]

Mike Debicki, I think.

[@bmcgrath45]

Nice work detective 'Um I don't remember' 🙄

[@olgarojas3509]

Nice work

[@Little1black2bird3]

This video looks like shoot from the target of a gun lol

[@hectorvalenzuela7952]

What on gods earth did you mean by that

[@Jabo__Jabo]

Well I did not look at every detail of this case, and I understand she killed Travis Alexander. But I do wish we could be clear on one thing: he was taking advantage of her and he was at the very least emotionally, psychologically, and sexually abusive. We should be able to say that about him.

[@1888.cfc.]

I see you're under stabbys spell. Ahh ahahaha everything you said you described stabby to a T to 'a normal population'

[@gabster-ie1vj]

You're a nut like she is

[@crowjones78]

Based on what? What evidence is there to back up this claim?

[@ASMRMagic]

Na, the jurors who saw ALL of the evidence, texts/emails etc. said that the defence painted an untruthful image of Travis in court and that he was a decent guy. 11 out of 12 jurors on this case were actually devastated that Jodi didn’t get the death penalty, as they saw right through her lies. Travis was just a normal guy who was brutally murdered in his home whilst he was naked and vulnerable and by somebody who was supposed to care about him and who had been intimate with him just hours prior. There’s no defending what she did.

[@erin.v.m657]

Lol. Shut up.

[@allivanaip]

Pause at 2:02.57😁😁😁

[@Alma2525]

Flores is such a boring witness

[@kjh6903]

I think he’s doing pretty good to even be there considering his 15 year old son was killed in a zip line accident before the start of this penalty retrial .

[@pacedelacruz4913]

How could a scrawny woman like that take on a guy that size? Was she on pcp? Who leaves a camera full of evidence on site after bludgeoning and shooting someone to death? I think a male did this and she must have been spaced out on drugs. A woman her size could never have taken on a guy that much bigger than her. Least? I can't see it. Each time she opens her mouth a different story comes out. I dom't think she's mentally competent; she's barely functional. Just my opinion. No one who would be able to "premeditate" would have left that camera behind. Something about this case is wrong, very wrong.

[@1888.cfc.]

Really? How would you manage sitting on a shower floor wet being stabbed sliding all over the place trying to get up and trying to fend off a knife. Don't forget he has minutes to live from being stabbed in the heart region. Can't believe I'm even explaining this.. How ignorant are you exactly?

[@shugochara9909]

you seem extremely vacuous. premeditated doesn’t mean that you can’t be sloppy, it simply means that she had planned the murder which is proven by here actions before i.e. dyeing her hair, flipping her license plates, buying three gas cans, leaving voicemails after the murder.. etc. he could have easily been over powered considering he was killed while naked, wet and in a slippery shower, he was stabbed 27 times with his back turned… that kind of overkill is clearly rooted in passion. She’s obviously mentally competent and sane although she’s arguably very deranged. there’s nothing strange about a guilty suspect changing their story several times when they are as vain as she is and constantly trying to preserve a innocent appearance. Her leaving the camera behind us just one example of how stupid she is, she thought just by deleting the photos they were actually gone, she’s clearly not very smart.

[@JJ-vb9ct]

Not sure why you have not the capability of understanding common sense. She planned the murder but not how she will handle all the possible outcomes after, just like any other murderer in history. She was not a small woman at all, she was actually as tall as he was and very strong (she’s even doing hand stands in the interrogation room after being arrested for the murder). There are no drugs, she’s just that dumb 😅

[@thetruth4154]

She premeditated his murder weeks prior to June 4,2008. The state has proved beyond reasonable doubts. She killed him three times over: stabbed him 27 times, a stab to his heart would have killed him, she almost decapitated him she literally saw his neck it is not a slash to his throat. She then shot him in the head. That is an overkill. The killer is a narcissist pathological liar. That is also proven in court. If you watch the trial you don’t need no damn expert to tell you that. You as a reasonable rational logical person can form your own conclusions based on evidences presented

[@jodiefinney5072]

He was sitting down in the shower, naked and wet when she first stabbed him IN THE HEART

[@whocarez]

Boring.

[@JessLBreen]

This dude is annoying I’ve seen way better prosecutors that don’t treat ppl the way he does which leads you to think he has to do that to over compensate…NY prosecutor Marcia Clark who was the prosecutor in OJ Simpson case has an amazing amount of successes esp being in ny with their crime and she never had to do all this! There will be a case he loses with this same tactic that has less evidence and no smoking gun I believe he would think twice because it will also effect him with the jury…that’s easy to do which you have stupid amounts of evidence and all! I WOULD pay a lot of money to see him prosecuting a case against Jose Baez (state vs Jose Baez client/defendant) ohhh buddy he would sit Martinez down having him play fetch and shake like a dog!

[@DrJ-hx7wv]

Oh shut up. You don't know what a prosecutor is

[@raspberrysoda2277]

Shut up Jodi sympathizer.

[@KrzNena]

You know, I’ve always thought that. I’m not a fan of Mr. Martinez. I felt like he was badgering Jodie on the stand. I totally get the anger towards her due to the nature of her crime but it seemed as though at times he was disrespecting her and like he wanted to argue with her. She’s obviously guilty and is where she needs to be though.

[@lylesommers5018]

I find it strange how the judge says Defendant as Defen dant