7 Ways To Pull Carbon From The Atmosphere | Random Thursday

[@adamlytle2615]

Me: You know, Joe doesn't really sound like he's from Texas Joe: See-ment Me: There it is.

[@joescott]

Hehe, yep. It comes out sometimes.

[@OG-vb1pl]

Classic old joe

[@shoam2103]

Paused at 22:00 just to see if someone posted a comment about this. Not disappointed!

[@shoam2103]

For a moment, I thought he was making a pun tho.. To match the earlier one about Sex-ed. You know about the CC. Carbon c-

[@phantomwalker8251]

@@shoam2103 if you get this,read my comment to joe,,its shocking..

[@SirMatthew]

"Seement" Yeah you're not slipping that one past me Joe

[@ethanurmson9342]

So that’s what the carbon industry is spewing all over our faces

[@Ingcivilcarlos]

I came to the comments just to say that. Sneaky Joe

[@myscreen2urs]

Semen...t. He must've been still thinking of the tangent cam bit.😁

[@zomb_bree7950]

SAME

[@ArealMrsSmith]

That’s honestly how most Texans pronounce “cement”.

[@JD3Gamer]

I saw a study recently that looked at trees ability to fight climate change and it showed that forests help to release more moisture into the atmosphere creating more cloud cover which helps to reflect more light from the sun. It basically was showing that there’s more benefits to planting trees than just carbon capture.

[@skiptheroad]

Shade

[@destructorzz7197]

Water vapour is a greenhouse gas so the benefits of this are probably negligible. Might be helping to block light but also traps more infrared so comes out pretty neutral

[@Sciencerely]

As a stem cell biologist, I think it's fascinating that we might be able to combat CO2 emissions through synthetic biology. Plants contain a set of unique genes which enable them to convert CO2 into sugars. Recently, scientists have introduced the same genes into bacteria thereby also giving them the ability to consume CO2 (I made a video about this). Although this technology is still quite ineffective and in its early stages, we could use it in larger scales to reduce CO2 emissions one day!

[@fredbloggs5902]

1) You still have to put it in sunlight somewhere 2) Efficiency is low

[@rhaven090]

Just exploit the gene editing market and make profit And with it gene that enables us to use carbon dioxide for energy will be developed along the way Just imagine gullible consumers tryna edit themselves to oblivion in the next decade.

[@crackedemerald4930]

What *haven't* you made a video on?

[@phillip6083]

But then what?biofuel?plastic?so it's more a carbon neutral tech then?

[@localsymbiosis]

I almost spit out my coffee at the “carbon spewing all over our faces” part. I love this channell

[@adrianruiz4144]

same

[@Twinkcentral]

Well, you do have carbon-spewing all over your face, every time you breathe out.

[@kayfrenly5460]

Climate change activism is a racist plot to try to keep many PoC countries from changing to better climates.

[@jimmjimms]

Love it

[@rolandsalomonsson3854]

More CO2 on Earth. Look above!

[@TrustyPumpkin]

“Of course, that would make the carbon...,,Eww.” Lol

[@Lethgar_Smith]

If you walk around the forests of New England you will constantly come across stone fences running randomly through the forests. These are the remains of old farms. During the colonial period they would clear these forests for firewood and building material and then plow the cleared land for farming. However, the soil of New England is very rocky and the fields had to be cleared of the rocks before it could be plowed. Therefore the rocks were dug up out of the soil and piled into fences along the borders of the farmers land. This was back breaking work. I remember trying to repair an old stone fence on my property and I found the majority of the stones were too heavy to lift by myself. As Americans moved further west the vast majority of these farms were abandoned for land easier to work. However the fences remain to remind us of a time when New England was largely deforested for farming.

[@Jack-tm4er]

I see them everywhere around southern new york! Every now and again you'll see a giant tree probably a couple hundred years old, around the newer trees, the ones planted after they deforested for farmland.

[@minecrafttutorialsandhaxfo1735]

wow

[@Spaghetti-is-gross]

They are so beautiful when they're taken care of

[@Snugggg]

We have the same thing in old england too! farm fences made with back breaking labour :D except not many are reforrested unfortunatly. we just have lots of empty fields.

[@venturefanatic9262]

You forgot about the part of Killing off the Indigenous Humans first.

[@JacobJames8]

I literally just taught a two hour lesson on CCS, then I login to KZbin and find the video! Guess what the students homework is!

[@Kavriel]

Damn, if my homework had been watching educational youtube content, my scholarity would have been great/better.

[@benjaminriches9736]

If I could just sit and watch Joe Scott for homework, I’d love life.

[@knowa24]

Start with Joe Scott and then learn the maths with the organic chemistry tutor.

[@simonmorgan225]

Washing your car?

[@paulhaynes8045]

I hope it's going to be a critical analysis of why Joe is dodging the real problem with CO2 by pretending magic tech is going to help?

[@samanthabeamish8631]

Really enjoyed this video. I am a farmer in Canada but also went to school for environmental engineering. We do our best to protect our water and soil but I had never thought much about ways to decrease carbon in the air. This is very interesting and I will think and do more research on it. Thanks! Also, thank you for your respect. It seems farmers always get blamed for all environmental problems without people realizing they are the ones who need the food or that most farmers also care and have made many improvements over the years.

[@jamesspry3294]

Good on you Samantha! Look up Gabe Brown, and also Joel Salatin. They are legendary regenerative farmers in North America. (I'm a regen farmer in Aus, so what I do is not really applicable...) Cheers!

[@Sniperboy5551]

Of course you never thought about it, nobody really cared until a decade or two ago!

[@MyPoposo]

I feel like carbon capture is less of a condom and more of a morning after pill...

[@Reth_Hard]

Yeah, what about planting trees? Hehehehehhhh...

[@robbirose7032]

Either way we are fucked.

[@iamtheleuz]

Did you actually pay attention to the video?

[@MyPoposo]

@@iamtheleuz yea! and I really liked it! learned some about new technologies for carbon capture and had some good laughs!

[@Leopold5100]

@Genie Le Bottle after its been left in there for far too long ................

[@timothysummers3807]

So satisfying seeing Joe get the following he deserves.

[@shxtgigs4662]

I’m only upset that I didn’t find joe earlier

[@dakotajones2487]

It's a long time coming I've been watching for a good bit

[@happyundertaker6255]

I represent this insinuation..

[@AwesomeBlackDude]

00:10 Here's the benchmark of this above post commentary and your welcome 😷

[@_JamesBrown]

Found him last week and I'm on a hard binge!

[@GimmieUtoob]

I never would have thought I’d hear a joke about facials in one of these videos.

[@GhostScout42]

Forests move the water from oceans to inland areas. Planting forests may be necessary just to fight droughts in the coming millennia

[@nokaton]

Planting forest causes more problems that solving it, because oftentimes they either plant wrong alien species or plant only one species (monoculture) which do more harm to the ecology in the area. The correct way to solve it is just leaving nature to be restored by itself. Literally, just leave them alone. Everything we human touches, it's screwed up.

[@Aconitum_napellus]

@@nokaton So you plant a mixture of indigenous trees.

[@nokaton]

​@@Aconitum_napellus Good in theory but not practical. By making some kind of artificial plantation, the plants need to be taken care of. You need an irrigation system, because you 'force' the plants to grow there. The aim is to restore the original ecosystem, not turning it into another kind of agriculture (monoculture or either mixed plant). The point is that the original ecosystem is more much much more diverse than what we can imitate. Letting the area to regrow plant by it self is better. The ecosystem can restore itself; plants can regrow without human intervention. I do not argue that, if it has been done enough correctly, it won't be good. But the strategy like mass planting would rather give worse outcomes, as more people involve, or either politics, it would lead to poor bureaucracy and poor management. (It already did happen in my country). You will end up in monoculture of alien plants. (don't underestimate bureaucracy).

[@rolandsalomonsson3854]

NO! Forrests do not "move" any water from oceans onto inland areas. It´s another process. When it rains in extream dry areas, the rainwater will evapourate in just some days. Only a minimum of that rain will go into the ground, if any, and build up subsoil water. NOTE! In most dessert areas there are enough rain to keep up forrests. That´s where humans have to help nature get those areas re-forrested. You have to plant trees! There are some "rules" to follow in order to get a happy result! Among others: * Forrests build up it´s own water suply * Choose trees species who can resist ground fires as most as possible. Mostly because it´s rootsystems sticks right down under the tree, and not grows wide near it´s stem. * The army have to protect the growing forrest from grassing cattles, especially goats. * The trick is to let tree species grow which protect from sun burning the ground. * Another trick is to build a lot of ponds up in the hills, where you can see old creeks etc have once flowed. They will catch a lot of water when it rains and not let it flow down too quickly. Then a lot of water will build subsoil water. Also start plant the right kind of trees round every pond. * To re-forrest a dessertarea needs time. That is possible to reduce. Build a coalplant and supply a system of pipelines from the oceans into the dessert areas. Then desalt that water and fill a lot of ponds/inlandsea´s. Better with coalplant, which can produce a lot of CO2 to spread around the dessert areas. Trees grow a lot faster then. Every professional vegetable grower knows that. * It´s also possible to make a cold area "warmer" if you plant the right species of tree. For ex northern half of Siberia was a normal forrested area where it today is tajga during the ice-age. But it´s only possible if there lives the right kind of animals, like mamuths, wolly rhino´s and especially the american bison. In fact russia have started a large project in Siberia about 50 years ago, where imported bisons now are re-moddeling large areas into steps and forrested areas. Bisons eat "bad" species and leave the good species.

[@rolandsalomonsson3854]

@@nokaton Read my post above!

[@altortugas5979]

“Spewing carbon all over our faces” is the best laugh I’ve had this year 😂

[@retrocentral]

Ecosia: Search engne that plants trees. OceanHero: Search engine that pulls plastic out of the ocean.

[@sirmongrel511]

I'm up to 275 trees since making Ecosia my default a two months ago.

[@johndododoe1411]

Those are just economic pseudosolutions, using good cause donations as an excuse to profit from people believing the marketing. Doesn't mean the good cause they donate to isn't good and worthy, merely that other ways to send money to the cause are probably smarter.

[@hoarder66]

"Spewing their carbon all over our faces" haha. Guess thats the money shot. Dang that casting couch is looking gross. Lmao

[@joelpassanha8996]

Well.... we do have to stop spewing Carbon into Mother Earth...

[@wallabra]

@@joelpassanha8996 Onto*, it's on the air, and it's pretty darn visible

[@robertthompson7059]

@@joelpassanha8996 Earth: What are you doing step species?!

[@mikeharrington5593]

Yes the timing of that comment following the preceding theme conjured up messy thoughts.

[@Jocobalo]

I shouldn't have watched this while at work. This comment made me laugh so hard.

[@brianbeswick]

Joe: “Big Oil is going to unload all over our faces!” KZbin: “We call that the No Money Shot. #Demonetized”

[@TheWhiteDragon3]

In Iowa where I live, our farmers plant a LOT of soybeans, and while they're not _technically_ being planted as cover crops since the soybeans are being sold for profit, in all effective regards they're an incredible cover crop. They're a legume, so they enrich the soil not just through carbon capture but also through nitrogen fixation, and if the soybeans can either be used for making people food or for feeding livestock.

[@andyiswonderful]

But that carbon capture is only fleetingly temporary. Eventually, the CO2 of that biomass gets returned to the atmosphere through microbial metabolism.

[@dividedconquered3784]

Soy beans are expensive! We need less meat and fish! To make 70% of the wild back to full diversity! It is at 40% right now! 😏

[@Aconitum_napellus]

@@dividedconquered3784 Cannibalism is carbon neutral.

[@fortwoodmisery]

@@Aconitum_napellus only self cannibalism.

[@rolandsalomonsson3854]

@@dividedconquered3784 No! Humanity needs MORE meat. That kind of fat is needed to make our brains grow in intelligense. At least 40% of our food have always been meat. It´s not about any kind of protein, it must be MEAT! All steps of human civilisations have started with new kinds of using meat. First step was to grill meat. Men made hunting-parties and got the 40%. Women gatherred the other 60% of food.

[@Ulmaramlu]

"ever heard of trees?" is the carbon capture version of the retail customer joking "does that mean its free?" when the scanner doesn't work.

[@phantomwalker8251]

cant have scanners without a forge,metals.ect..

[@TMS9918A]

By customer, you mean boomer, right? That's totally boomer humor (not funny or clever in the slightest)

[@Ulmaramlu]

@@TMS9918A Nope I mean customer. never called anyone boomer, never plan to. same with calling someone "a Karen". Derogatory terms rub me the wrong way

[@c.s1393]

@@Ulmaramlu waah waah

[@jamesrempel8522]

@@TMS9918A Maybe, but I've heard plenty of gen-Xers and millennials use that sort of humour too.

[@nameless2259]

This gets a like from me just cause of adult humor

[@MrGreenutedave]

As a Farmer who has been using cover cropping and spreading basalt recently I found this pretty interesting. No incentives to do it from government or anywhere else, it just makes sense.

[@getsmartr]

I love how moderate your videos are. I know that doesn't sound like a compliment but I don't feel like you have any hidden motives. It's all out in the open. In a word, honest. It's refreshing and I appreciate it.

[@mtiedemann11]

And evidence based - far too little of that these days

[@richardlangley90]

I agree. Dave Borlace of Just Have a Think is the same that way.

[@darksu6947]

He's a paid shill!

[@AdeptXR]

I stopped mowing the back half of my lawn. I've counted 20+ little trees that are now naturally growing. Plus I use less gas mowing the lawn. It's a start.

[@adamwest8711]

I’m sure your neighbours salute your efforts.

[@AdeptXR]

@@adamwest8711 my only neighbor will soon be out of sight.... when the trees are fully grown lol

[@rth0mas]

Some characters do that towards the end of the Overstory (great book). Everyone tries to get them to mow their lawn again. But it’s not what the planet wants or needs

[@miroslavhoudek7085]

"Instead of bitcoin mining, you can mine sky" *Midnight Oil wants to know your location.*

[@ATM648]

I just like the sound of mining the sky! I look up and see dollar signs all around!

[@bernhardkrickl3567]

I'm embarrassed that I didn't think of this. Long time fan here and Blue Sky Mine is one of my favourite songs of theirs.

[@stooge_mobile]

Joe Scott's audience and Midnight Oil listeners. Surprisingly, there's an overlapping area in that Venn Diagram.

[@zynosgd9982]

The 4 phases of climate change denial: 1: "Climate change isn't real" 2: "Ok, maybe it's real but humans aren't to blame" 3: "fuck" 4: "Oh, god, fuck..."

[@Nunyabeeswax777]

I can’t stop thinking of the fact that the best carbon scrubbing machines also create carbon.... and often a lot of it

[@cmath4871]

Needs to be combined with nuclear. We now have portable non meltdown producing reactors. Just needs the will and care...

[@MiceOnVenus_]

@@cmath4871 “the decisions made by the powers-that-be will get to us in the end."

[@aronseptianto8142]

i mean ofc, the law of conserved mass, unless you literally nuclear it, carbon is still carbon, however way to move it around the trick is to make the carbon useful in a less messy way

[@isaach1447]

@@aronseptianto8142 damnit...I was gonna say that!🤔

[@rhoell2050]

Carbon scrubbing centipede

[@viknumbers701]

The answer is to use a variety of cost effective carbon capture techniques appropriate to the climate, bio and geo environments and available technologies.

[@jimmage7430]

EverGreenCoin will reward you for DIY carbon reduction and sequestering.

[@1drumshark]

Partially yes, but reversing climate change will not be cheap. Acting as if it could be will just be used to wait until it's too late

[@jimmage7430]

@@slevinchannel7589 no but am always happy to learn new stuff. I have just paid people for composting, using char and, mulch in no till zones.

[@quantumfoam539]

Last time I was this early our oil was still walking.. Edit: thank you all to point that out scientifically it is indeed true that most of fossil fuel comes from plants especially from the great rainforest collapse from the end of the carboniferous period. Still oil is frequently called dinosaur-juice as a joke.

[@findlvrg4276]

That's early...

[@jb76489]

Oil comes mostly from plants

[@DanielPereira-ey9nt]

I belive most of it was swiming

[@heliosphaeresonnen_wind_ki5720]

never was. 🌱

[@crackedemerald4930]

@@DanielPereira-ey9nt probably not, plankton comes from greek and it means "drifters". Plankton are lazy bastards.

[@JonathanAdami]

The issue with biomass is the economics behind it. The romantic "it takes waste products and make energy" quickly turns into "how do we make more waste products to maximise profit" and you're back in destructive behaviours :/

[@paulhaynes8045]

Excellent point. Like growing soya - to feed cows!

[@JJs_playground]

That's exactly what I was thinking when he mentioned BCCS. Sure, at first it'll be waste biomass, but knowing humans and our propensity for needing / wanting more energy, we're going to end up cutting down more trees / forests to burn. Not a good idea.

[@bryanforbes5962]

Its truly bizarre to think that a generation of humans reared in post apocalyptic, hindsight being 20/20, less effort is for metaphoric effect, carbonless causational irony? Click = C02 coal plant woosh. That a bottomless sticky bag of clicky sugar clicky pellet info entertainment clicky news is best neutralizing or disuading the power in voting, or better still silencing the potential collective voice in our economic power to choose our future. Truth is positive. Its gotta stay positive not to balance failure or hedge funds. Silouette Absoltuism, candy coated fatalism and comfy defeatism worry me more. We have already cautioned, thorough scientific study, and reasonably open doors and minds. Should we consistently lose the future for humanity arguing money= bad humans? Should empowered humans only be Monkey's Paw twilight zone cliches? KZbin click = Coal powered Co2 Wo0sH = Automated machine that cleans up carbon while rubbing a silicone wafer and lithium battery together into a AI sparking neuron that says "shut up dumb poor people..kaboom" Sigh. Do it anyway. More cowbell though= more human. The waters are deep here, we should set an agreed depth, build the ladder down with public demand, the will to build bridges, dams, Aquaducts! Canals! concentrated public effort and employment interest, to gauge the real difficulties and daily stress to climb out, each day, back to our safe warm more bells easier whistles homes? So we dont automate out of human. Underneath highway overpasses. We should jump feet first. Into the water, embolden by the cold, the will and love to swim. Heck, push and pull all the older generation businesses in by their nethers. We gotta do this before a tv celebrity, anti leads, our anti-government, into throwing all our skilled labor out of college, and solvent work, and instead into detainment camps, with our families on the wrong side of graffiti and train tracks. We need a Gamal Abdel Nasser, a friendly old jewish guy in mittens, we need to dream huge here. Thanks Joe. Great video!

[@vaszgul736]

All I know is I hope for a future where teachers tell students "people back in the 21st century believed that the climate was going to collapse and that the world would become a lifeless desert" ---as a means of explaining the strange, foreign concept to kids, kids who can't fathom anything of the sort because it is so far beyond their reality. A man can dream.

[@BigDaddyWes]

This isn't a problem that any future generation won't have to deal with.

[@Sorcerers_Apprentice]

At one time, everyone was concerned about overpopulation, but due to birth control, governments are now worried about population decline (in reality, it is stabilizing). We can't hope for a single technology to come along and fix the climate for us, but hopefully we can find a way to at least pull back from the brink within our lifetimes.

[@hearmerant]

8:40 Rotating crops is so new a practice it's mentioned in the bible...

[@joescott]

Everything old is new again.

[@matheussanthiago9685]

''I see the future repeating the past, I see a museum of big novelties'' - Cazuza, time doesn't stop

[@Cspacecat]

@Timothy Mckee Before the industrial revolution, CO2 was at 280ppm. During the last glacial period, CO2 was at 180ppm. Plants still grew. The only difference is the amount of breathing holes at the underside of the leaves. We are now at 417ppm. That means there will be fewer breathing holes under the leaves. Like sunlight, plants absorb only so much per day. It's a stupid idea to think CO2 will be beneficial in additional quantities. If you haven't noticed, the western US is on fire. How much CO2 are those burnt trees and houses going to absorb?

[@Cspacecat]

@Timothy Mckee Quite the contrary, if the temperature continues to rise, the majority of the planet's land area will turn into a desert.

[@Cspacecat]

@Timothy Mckee I have listened to Harper on numerous occasions. He's a denialist. If we continue in our direction, we will encounter another Permian extinction-type event. No matter what, the fossil fuel industry is coming to an end. Civil lawsuits will probably kill them off before anything else. Right now there are only about a dozen lawsuits. It won't be long and that number will go into the hundreds.

[@RahulJoshi]

I remember reading that tweet as it happened "Hey Elon, ever hear of a tree... yap yap!" and that's the exact same Karen face I made. LOL!! 🤣🤣

[@susantait1987]

I’m the furthest thing from educated in all of this but, tell me Joe, how do you manage to scare the shit out of me and give me hope at the same time?? Keep up the good work and let all of us “ commoners” know what we can do to turn this beautiful ship we call home around. Thank you for just being an “average, concerned joe”. You represent so many of us!

[@apexpredator2118]

They should try to find a way to incorporate all that carbon into batteries we all are going to need so many of in the future.

[@kensmith5694]

It is already happening with Lithium batteries. New types use carbon.

[@scottiejohnson2639]

Great idea!!! 💯

[@silviafox78]

we can easily turned captured carbon into fuel for vehicles. Carbon neutral fuel!

[@kensmith5694]

@@silviafox78 Yes, microbes that use sunlight and CO2 to make oil are already a thing. We just now have to make the process more efficient. I would keep this sort of thing mostly for aircraft. The car I use on a daily basis can easily electric. Long haul trucking needs an energy source that brings a lot of energy for not too much weight.

[@silviafox78]

@@kensmith5694 - Yeah, Fossil Fuels are still one of the easiest and highest energy-dense tools to use for transportation along with being extremely cheap and already having world-wide supply/demand... It's only going to be replaced in select ways and I believe only once it the price rises due to scarcity will we ever stop using it and switch to the eventually 'cheaper' options which may be better for the environment but that could still choke our lower income workers and families. That reminds me how the american president Biden cancelled the keystone pipeline. That pipeline would have helped save on emissions since the oil would otherwise be transported by train and truck. People say pipelines are bad for the environment but in reality they are overall better than our older ways of transporting the oil. That particular pipeline was targeted strongly even though america already had many thousands of giant pipelines already in operation.

[@titchglover2601]

Team everything on board. Cement homes that absorb carbon sounds good however does it absorb continuously or after a year it's full?

[@AndysRamblings]

People often forget that trees can feed us, too. Nuts are some of the most calorie-dense foods. Carbon-sequestration farming = reforestation

[@GhostScout42]

And that they move water from the ocean inland through rain and evaporation

[@kensmith5694]

Don't forget things that are technically bushes and not trees. Some of them produce a very large food harvest.

[@DrJohnnyJ]

Tree farms aren't forests and only capture 2% of the CO2 that a forest would.

[@AndysRamblings]

@@DrJohnnyJ True, modern industrial monocrop tree farms are definitely NOT forests, and are pretty lame about sequestering carbon (some are actually net emitters by depleting soil carbon) but we can do much better than that. Modern experiments in agro/ecology/agroforestry and permaculture have shown that we can in fact steward systems that simultaneously feed us and sequester substantial amounts of carbon, while also rebuilding biodiversity and becoming more resilient to the already-changing climate. Edit: I will try to dig up some reference papers on this after work; I know I have them somewhere but finding them again is the challenge :P

[@AndysRamblings]

A lit review I was able to dig up quickly: Nair, PK Ramachandran, et al. "Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems." Advances in agronomy 108 (2010): 237-307. Will dig more if I have time later

[@ltmq6641]

lmao, the condom reference killed me

[@fatdad64able]

So as a German, let me ask you this: a condominium is a small condom?

[@GAMakin]

@@fatdad64able maybe in Joe's case IDK (and I don't want to know, although he'd probably tell me if the price was right) BUT elsewhere in Texas (Land of the Swinging Dicks) we make use of (or at least claim to do so) the CONDOMAXIMUM. Extra room, in case you wind up in the "family way". On the BRIGHTSIDE™: you get to tear through walls.

[@spacedoohicky]

Hemp is apparently much better at sequestration than trees. So that would mean getting rid of the dumb laws of the United States would also contribute to decreasing global warming.

[@petrapewpew]

We need to make soil, grow more than just trees, we need to grow EVERYTHING. Better yet, grow a food forest that provides food for people and animals. You grow more than tree crops with guild planting than increases the biomass per square foot

[@SabethDrake]

Hey Joe, long time viewer here. I love and appreciate what you do and one of these days I plan on joining your patreon. Thanks bro

[@joescott]

I appreciate that, thanks!

[@aaronwelther3536]

4:45 I'm totally on your side, we really need to do EVERYTHING to reduce the level of greenhous gases in the athmosphere! #TeamAllTheThings

[@griffithsOZ]

Natural Sequence Farming and Regenerative Farming are also ways to increase the carbon holding capacity of the soil on farms.

[@caroljo420]

I've read that planting bamboo cleans the air much faster than trees, because they grow so quickly.

[@Myth8Anthropology]

Bamboo is a type of tree! And yes, bamboo is a carbon sequestering champion but is only appropriate in certain climates and certain micro-climates within the macro climates.

[@matheussanthiago9685]

@@Myth8Anthropology isn't it an type of grass?

[@jakobklee2800]

@@Myth8Anthropology Bamboo is anything but a tree species.

[@randomguy-ys1mu]

@@Myth8Anthropology it's grass

[@Myth8Anthropology]

@@jakobklee2800 You are correct, I stand corrected. Bamboo is taxinomically in the same family as grasses. However, Caroljo is correct in saying that they grow faster than trees. Growth = biomass = carbon sequestration.

[@ALT-fp9vc]

I am an agrologist and the part about cover crops was well summarize. Good video and thanks for your good work :)

[@punditgi]

Joe, great video! Also talk soon about regenerative farming and land restoration and wilding plus natural cycle livestock farming methods.

[@irri3191]

Okay forget trees let's talk bushes... I love a thick bush. 🤗😘

[@bryanforbes5962]

Great video Joe! So many want to see these ideas to fruition. Here is a fun idea to get our kids and more of the public involved and give these ideas more voice and trending. What if theis a community Minecraft pages. ( Laugh here) Like the one that built the entire map of Westeros from GOT. Except these are a series of DIY Civil Engineering build maps that show use and explanation of the different carbon sequestering options built into our local energy production and transportation corridors. Canals transporting heat island effect and other waste heat reclamation, networked with Wind Turbine and Solar farms, networked with Solar Ponds, networked with Basalt production, and Molten Salt energy storage plants, networked with bog/quarry filtration, water remediaton, desalination, hydropower energy dams, networked with farm lands, fish hatcheries, canal boat, fishing and camping travel services, networked with wild fire prevention and forestry Park and Rec, Civilian Conservation Corps, networked with road and high speed rail transport lines, networked with Desalination plants networked with Costal Wave Power plants , networked with Off Shore Carbon Injection Rigs, etc So effectively a DIY demonstration on how they integrate with existing real life infrastructure, and by popularity and impressive design, therby inspire actual civil engineering firms and power plant infrastructure businesses to seek public investment and lobby actual grass roots investment and expectations for Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Department of Energy and State agency Department of Transportation, etc....phew Easy A, live. interactive Science experiments that can be engaged online by kids who can effectively copy and save their own versions and present to class. Would also make for epic ongoing side stories in daily local news to hear how grade school kids are investing thought, energy, and imagination into their futures and literally be, children thinking of children, as constituents pushing our legislative representation to literally see the future we want.

[@chronus4421]

So you want a machine that pulls carbon from the air, spits out oxygen, and is solar powered? That's called a tree. -Joe Scott, 2020.

[@alwayslearning3671]

I saw one last week about growing kelp on buoys in mid-ocean. The dead leaves would sink into the deep ocean. Once in place, it would just keep running as long as the buoys were there to provide an anchor point for the kelp.

[@ricknoyb1613]

I could see turning our Pacific plastic mass into a floating platform for kelp forests. Fight two problems while increasing biodiversity by increasing biospheres in deep ocean areas that do not effectively produce sealife.

[@Tarkov.]

"But the kids are gonna start having more (protected) sex" *motions vaguely at teen pregnancy rates*

[@powertechnical]

Weird way pronouncing cement 🤔

[@ryanroberts1104]

Texans do everything weird.

[@Luke-jo4to]

Love that KZbin feels like it needs to plug a Wikipedia article to give this channel “context”...

[@paulmaydaynight9925]

they have to do it as real people cant post direct url's on yt any more in context or not, odd , why aren't you surprised , where are 'the woke' complaining they cant post their url's

[@danmallery9142]

Could hemp be used as a cover crop? Also, does growing cover crops take into account the fertilizer and the fossil fuel burned in their growth? Hopefully, they would more than offset these factors.

[@SoybeanAK]

No idea if anyone will read this but here goes: 1) No, hemp wouldn't be a cover crop. The idea is low-growing plants that provide a thorough barrier between sky and soil, to slow down falling precipitation and keep soil cooler. Carbon capture is just a side benefit! So think grasses, not bushes. Also the idea is you plant in fall and grow them over winter, then plant corn or whatever cash crop on the land in the spring. Hemp is a thirsty tropical plant with a fraction of the root density of grasses. 2) You don't use fertilizer for cover crops. That's the idea. And planting grasses via broadcast spreading (or even no-till drilling) in just-harvested ground uses a relatively minute amount of diesel. HTH!

[@99nejko]

I was sad that you didn't mention regenerative grazing

[@kensmith5694]

Yes, he missed that and some others where it isn't trees.

[@colinwalke2443]

Huge opportunity not just for carbon, but water and work. Labour intensive and not very vulnerable to Automation.

[@rdeets]

So… Instead of saving the planet, Elmo bought a $44 Billion toy, destroyed the toy’s value by turning it into a propaganda medium for the Kremlin, and figuratively got his ass kicked by Zuck in the social media wars while trying to get his ass literally kicked by Zuck in a cage. “Smartest man in the entire world” my ass.

[@darthcuny]

What I wanna see is a carbon removal scheme which goes straight to pristine graphene. Not too big of a request =_=

[@paulmaydaynight9925]

@@Reiman33 who told you that.. some MSN theoretical astrophysicist and their for profit private corp were 'viable' = massive board member profits for cheap , ask a real engineer and chemist. "Pristine graphene - that is graphene in its original, pure, unoxidized form - enjoys superior properties to its oxidized counterpart." actually go to elemental is simples ^_~

[@RyanRommes1337]

Now imagine all the CO2 that will be put into the air just to make these things feasible

[@azmanabdula]

Make diamond slabs out of carbon as some sort of new currency And seal them in glass Or even just compressed carbon blocks in glass and say they are worth .....whatever they are worth

[@peglor]

@@azmanabdula It's too cheap and easy to make carbon blocks from fossil fuels unfortunately, so as soon as a value is given to blocks of carbon as a currency (Over what carbon is worth as electric motor brushes, lubricant, charcoal, tire ingredient and pencil lead among many other things), the forgery rate will be high and it won't encourage any carbon sequestration.

[@azmanabdula]

@@peglor I didnt say it was perfect

[@joemckraken7960]

shhhhhhh, dont talk about details. these fools think they can control the temperature of the planet by manipulating CO2, like its some kind of thermostat.

[@adamderrick5336]

“Spewing their carbon all over our faces” I laughed so hard

[@bbernotus2354]

“Then that makes carbon the.....” and Joe a fluffer

[@Emm2004]

Good job on the video, joe (haven’t watched it but I somehow know this to be true).

[@pixelsafoison]

The idea of creating a market for carbon is absolutely stupid. Why? Because it'll always be cheaper to BURN stuff to get it. Governments have to enforce "100% recaptured carbon only for industrial uses" laws if this is ever going to be a thing. And we all know that there's too much money involved -> Will not happen.

[@frien_d]

talking about "new farming practices after the dustbowl" really sets me off: "new practices" as in "already used by the romans and most of europe since millenia, but completely forgotten or never learned by ignorant settlers that didn't bother bringing any books across the atlantic", jeez.

[@ayandragon2727]

Crop rotation was around, but it's not like the roman government gave incentive for farmers to prioritize soil health over planting enough to make a normal living. Some techniques used after the dust bowl were new, some were old, but not used.

[@frien_d]

@@ayandragon2727 obviusly government incentives were not a thing in rome, but did anyone ever found any trace of europeans turning europe into a dustbowl during the roman or middle ages period? And mind you, most of germany is as sandy as you can get. But then, maybe I'm uninformed. And this kind of disaster (like , well every other kind of disaster) struck europe once or twice in the last 2k years, and that's were the teaching stuck. At least until 'murica.

[@channelbree]

@@frien_d It's like how the Spanish do it with their 'Dehesa' zones, like naturally spread out Oak plantations that pigs and other animals that live on. America is so vast that it's evolved differently.

[@frien_d]

@@channelbree my point is it failed to evolve and managed to devolve

[@S.R.Crnt.]

Congratulations Joe on your beautiful channel's well-deserved success. It's amazing to see how far you've come since the first time I stumbled upon your 'how to make an old fashioned' video. Which BTW, I did make and turned out so good, I am constantly asked to make one for my friends.

[@magicman9486]

I have 1 word. "Hemp" Hemp is said to absorb 15000 lbs of CO2 per acre (Don't quote me). Use the resultant crop for paper manufacturing, capturing the carbon in the form of paper. It can also be use to build Building materials. I am sure it has many other uses but these are the 2 easiest to implement. If you were to seed industrial hemp (This is not marihuana) into unused area of north America you could Significantly reduce the carbon levels. Also Buffalo and cattle can readily digest hemp.

[@joyl7842]

13:25 - *the surface of the earth. Pretty sure the rest of the earth is mostly rock and other materials and we live on the thinnest skin of it which contains 70% water.

[@azmanabdula]

and a layer of gas (Thinner fluid) above that layer

[@JonathanOrosco]

I love that you promoting options gets "context" from KZbin. They really are kind of acting like a publisher right now...

[@Furiends]

Mining CO2 is an abysmally awful idea since you can most efficiently simply burn things to fill a tank of CO2 instead of "mining" the air. What you can do however is swapping where a purchaser trades CO2 only when its paired with Helium. Because it'd be more expensive to buy the helium separately then it could just buy CO2 selling the CO2 with Helium proves it was extracted from the air.

[@nicholaskelly7275]

I would love for you to do a show about the use of intensive herd grazing to sequester carbon. Getting rid of the massive feed lots a getting animals out on pasture. Helping build soil and sequester more carbon than any of the other ways you talked about. Watch Kiss the ground. It does a great job of showing how this works. Also there are lots of ranchers out there that are following these practices like Joel Salatin, Gregg Judy, and three sisters cattle company.

[@Voltanaut]

I've never heard CEE-ment before. It's always being ce-MENT. Interesting.

[@privateerburrows]

If powdered basalt really does capture CO2, then all we have to do is, by international agreement, have producers of fertilizer add basalt to their fertilizers. Then there is no question of adoption. A similar thing was done when iodine deficiency was a problem around the world; they made all salt producers add iodine to salt. Problem solved. (Today there are people so uninformed and stupid they go to any length to AVOID iodized salt, of course. Not that there's anything wrong with sea salt or hymalayan pink salt; just the lack of iodine; which is fine if you take a multivitamin a day and get your iodine requirement that way; or if you consume kelp regularly.)

[@IKEMENOsakaman]

I failed Physics in High School. I wish you were my physics teacher.

[@ninodino444]

he is not qualified to be a physics teacher

[@irri3191]

I wish she was my lab partner

[@riggs20]

I think this is more chemistry than physics. I may be wrong though.

[@irri3191]

@@Dave-ty2qp tell me you're being sarcastic. 🙄 The physics of hydrodynamics is taught to plumbers. If so facto without physicist you be pooping behind the tree.

[@riggs20]

@@irri3191 LOL. I don't think he is. Someone failed high school physics and still has a grudge. 😉

[@FabiWann]

I'm on team all the things PLUS Molten Salt Thorium Nuclear Reactors!

[@scottslotterbeck3796]

He said zero about clean, safe, carbon-free nuclear power.

[@Sciolist]

Thorium isn't exactly a nuclear fuel, more of a nuclear filler that can be used with fuel.

[@agsystems8220]

Nuclear weapons for everyone! Unfortunately molten salt reactors are a proliferation hazard, and it is nigh on impossible to make thorium work otherwise. Any reactor capable of burning thorium is also capable of producing plutonium 239 while burning uranium, and we don't want those type of reactors being common.

[@egyeneskifli7808]

And of course all of these solutions is somewhat connected to profit from it somehow. If the profit is still the main goal, than we deserve to die out. Carbon market? Give me a break! No, it shouldn't be marketed. The marketing of carbon quaotas should be forbidden too. If an automotive company can't fulfill its quota whit its current product range, than it must retire its worst offenders from the market. Fuck off, the whole thing is a joke in this form. There are always at least one loophole built in the system. Nobody really want to do a thing about carbon emissions, just create new forms of making profit.

[@harbinger_9152]

Me: watching this video whilst putting another log on the fire...

[@speedisgood71]

Hello, Mr. Biden!

[@christopherhamilton5557]

😂😂😂

[@charlieevergreen3514]

14:34 "AI-powered bioreactors"? Can you say more about that?

[@Vinit.R]

Joe, please do not advocate and spread the idea that "burning of biomass" is a carbon neutral or carbon negative technology, you can check out this video that covers this topic quite well. In summary, Biomass centric carbon capture technology or BECCS is just another excuse that the industry has found to clear out vast areas of forests. kzbin.info/www/bejne/p3vCZqaCjM2Jr6s Other than that, I found your video to be quite informative. Do keep up your good work.

[@gurbym5513]

Hey Joe, firstly THANK YOU for this amazing channel, love your videos, insights, and dedication to spreading well researched knowledge. Could you do a video on the new (unscientific) theory that older, advanced civilizations built the pyramids and Gobleki Teppi (mostly made famous by Hancock). The theory sounds sketchy to me and although it would take only 10,000 years for no trace of a civilization to remain, isn't that incorrect? Wouldn't there still be some signatures that would remain (fossil bones, waste that was fossilized, etc)? I thought that whole pyramid thing was put to rest but this new theory seems thought provoking. Thank you.

[@ricknoyb1613]

Not exactly. Should we perish and an alien science team arrive 100,000 years after our demise. Our activities in changing the earth's surface would still remain. Effects to the terrain from road building, mining and construction would be evidence of an intelligent species once dominating the planet as would leftover nuclear stockpiles and waste. A few of our probes sent into space or to other orbiting bodies would also show the emergence of a space-faring species long into the future. I like the idea of a massive glass pyramid or cone built on earth's south pole as a repository of everything humanity has ever encountered. As long as Antactica doesn't move around too much, the poles would seem a logical point to explore for an alien species. And should temperatures remain low enough, a lot of earth's dna could remain viable for study

[@borbleborb4586]

Earth: *actually dying* Government: *yall hear sum?*

[@apexprimebest]

The planet is fine, the people are fucked. Planet isn't going anywhere... we are.

[@KevinLyda]

You might credit George Carlin for that response.

[@apexprimebest]

@@KevinLyda I was looking for someone who would take it at face value, lol. But yeah... obviously by one and only George Carlin))

[@americaswayout4489]

Folks, the two most cost-effective resources on the planet are saltwater and desert lands near the saltwater. Now a plant that grows in saltwater that creates oil from the air is planted in the 45,000 miles of desert coastland planted with this oil-producing plant and the carbon that was vented into the air is returned to the soil and captured in its seeds. A very clean diesel-like fuel is produced and can be sold to offset the farm's overhead. This clean fuel will extend the life of the engines that burn it which also is a cost saver. Along with these oil-producing saltwater-grown plants a food-producing fish and shrimp farm can be built together. The plants after their best oil-producing periods can be then mixed with coal 60-40 to be used to create clean electricity allowing existing now dirty coal power plants to be used keeping electricity cost lower. The broken chain of energy being taken from the ground used vented into the atmosphere, and returned back into the ground? Climate change issue solved. By the way, the seawater used to water 45,000 miles of planted desert lands will be enough to stop and prevent sea levels from rising.

[@MrZenerTech]

HEMP, HEMP, HEMP!!! Fast and easy crop to grow and harvest. Makes a great alternate crop to grow in between regular crops. Carbon capture and a great building material and fuel and food and medicine and sooooooo much more!

[@remkoburger6595]

Yeah, why is it illegal again?

[@paulmaydaynight9925]

@@remkoburger6595 there's more than one see 'matted hemp sheets' etc

[@remkoburger6595]

@@paulmaydaynight9925 I know that. My comment had a cynical element

[@ryansnustad9133]

But, the kids man, the kids will smoke it all. There are people who still think hemp can get you stoned. You probably voted for a few of them, if you vote. And if elections aren't just suggestions.

[@samuelclassen553]

All true but its properties as a building material is always over hyped, the static load limit of "hemp-crete" is single digits % of typical cement and aggregate

[@x_pogboy6594]

The dislikes are from amazon tree cutting mafia

[@paulbyerlee2529]

I am so pissed. Back when I was 5 in 1986 I asked my dad (who was an engineer) if you could use concrete to store co2. He said it wasn't a good idea ☹️. Dam why for once couldn't a grown up take a kids idea seriously 😂

[@wltrlg]

Basically, we're screwed...😂

[@jackielinde7568]

So, what you're saying is that we could see SodaStream (TM) devices with this "Electroswing" carbon capture in it? But wouldn't that cut into SodaStream(tm)'s business model of selling us bottles of CO2?

[@kimlibera663]

Trees have always been the #2 sink of pulling co2 out of the air don't know why you don't think it's high on the list. Carbon capture techs will exist around where the machinery is which is not everywhere. Trees & plants occupy a significant part of the planet's topography.

[@jamespaul2587]

I probably shouldn't disclose the fact that I'm working on a giant Spaceballs vacuum to win Elon's prize... finding a long enough cord is challenging

[@i-craftsdesign3175]

Whenever I get a telemarketer call trying to sell me something: 0:20

[@Jim54_]

They should reuse hydroelectric plants to power carbon capture stations, while moving the grid towards Nuclear energy. Also, to those in the comments section berating carbon capture technology, I would point out that no amount of trees is going to capture all the carbon we burned from deposits in which it was stored safely for millennia. One plant over a short period of time won’t fix the problem, but it’s a start.

[@seionne85]

That tangent oh my gawd XD carbon is gross lmao

[@BLClark-wf2yk]

Dude, I had to replay that face you made at the beginning 🤣

[@AlexanderEM4840]

1000-2000 years to plant 500 billion trees? 500 B trees divided by 7 B people is 72 trees per person. I'll plant 72 trees in my yard right now, from the seeds of the pine, fir and birch in my garden.

[@stephentroake7155]

Thanks for another informative video 👍🏻 You mentioned that alternative cement was a different material, but I seem to remember hearing on a podcast recently that there is a low-carbon way of making exactly the same material. The beauty of this is that it's less of a worry for the construction industry, who are often (understandably) conservative.

[@stephentroake7155]

@Slevin Channel yes, I find it sad that connecting people into new communities based on beliefs and ideologies ironically makes society more polarised. To be rational is to fight against human nature and I think that critical thinking skills should be embedded in school curricula around the world.

[@garethbaus5471]

The production of normal cement as it is used in concrete is inherently going to realease a significant amount of CO2, the best we can do is replacing the heat source with something carbon neutral.

[@stephentroake7155]

This chap's had a look at the options as they stand at the moment: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5yoXmWkpc6kfMU

[@davidbeppler3032]

Solar panels that produce lab diamonds. Use the diamonds to pave roads. Solves all the problems. You are welcome.

[@irri3191]

You get a diamond grill and you get a diamond grill and you get a diamond grill. Everybody gets a diamond grill.

[@hansweissabel123]

Ughhh kill me please why is it so fucking hard to capture those rascaly molecules why can it not be as simple as in game logic. I am (age wise) in the middle of gen z and I really hope my gen including me can solve the modern issues including this one at least at a lot more managable level for the next generation I'd say maybe solve every nuance up to 75% if that makes sense? But I still have around 5 years to fully focus and care about co2 emissions at least I hope.

[@klunkmedia]

The EAS could be integrated into the aircon systems of office buildings or homes is suppose.

[@MarcosProjects]

THANK you for touching on the methane release from permafrost feedback loop. PLEASE do a whole video about it, it could get SOOOOO bad :(

[@scottslotterbeck3796]

Don't have kids. Over-population is the reason we're in this mess.

[@johntheux9238]

Was +6°C in the Eocene and there was a lot of life... Why would it be worse now?

[@johntheux9238]

@@scottslotterbeck3796 Once we have clean energy there could be 10-100 times more people, not an issue. Just need to solve vertical farming too.

[@scottslotterbeck3796]

@@johntheux9238 You're crazy. Every American requires up to five acres of land PER PERSON. Your idea would rape the Earth, lead to habitat loss and extinction. Why do you hate the environment and animals???

[@richardstevens3478]

One degree C temperature rise since the industrial revolution isn’t that much. The Milankovich cycles are one reason for the rise. It’s been warmer than now many times in history. We need to adjust to our climate. Knock yourself out but don’t expect me to pay for it.

[@PaxxMontana]

See-ment. Love the Texas access joe ❤️

[@PaxxMontana]

Joe liked my comment!!!!! AHHHH I LOVE YOU JOE. KEEEP MAKIN AMAZING VIDEOS JOE. I LOVE YOU WITH MY WHOLE HEART

[@aaronramsden1657]

I'm surprised this isn't being treated as urgently as it needs to be. The entire world's survival depends on it.

[@phantomwalker8251]

regardless of what you think or do..the earth will have another ice age,the sun will flare. & we start again.. your 13,000 yrs is almost up..beware..

[@tsamoka6496]

Another option is finding a cheap and efficient way to crack carbon dioxide to harvest the carbon from it for the 'many' different useful applications it has, and then either just dump the oxygen back into the air or use it for something else. =^x^=