There is also a novel 'Skin Game' by Jim Butcher published in 2014😊
@dr.m.natarajanmn27886 ай бұрын
Excellent 😊 Mam
@silentreader84612 жыл бұрын
I must say she creates literature in literature, thank you for your support Ma'am
@pragyapragya9712 жыл бұрын
Watching this videos again for revision 😁
@sahanajparvin14902 жыл бұрын
Thank u soo much ma'am for this amazing video as usual...💖
@sonaannasiby44152 жыл бұрын
Thank you ma'am ❤️❤️
@sriparnamahapatra8688 Жыл бұрын
Forsyte saga The man of property In chancery To let
@AhmedKashmiri112 жыл бұрын
Like done'kay saath aayah hu 👍
@nehasah89922 жыл бұрын
My dearrrrr ma'am
@psychocreep9400 Жыл бұрын
hello mam, good evening! I was wondering if you could compare Shaw and Galsworthy as dramatists of problem play. I have a few points; could you please look them over and let me know if I'm working in the right direction? 1. Both Shaw and Galsworthy both dealt with issues with class difference, Shaw's problem plays had varied themes --from fallen women to hypocrisy in the romanticizing of war and love and hero, and many more, majority of Galsworthy's plays tried to expose the problems in the contemporary legal system (from solitary imprisonment to lives of people out of prison and so on). 2. Galsworthy was often very unbiased in his plays. He sympathized with the victims of society while rationally understood the administers of the law. Shaw's plays were didactic in the sense that even though his plays were plays of ideas, it was his opinion that was emphasized the most; he gave very clear cut confident opinions. This was also how he was different from Ibsen, I suppose. 3. Galsworthy's problem plays were serious. Shaw's was a very witty writer and all his plays were comedies even as they dealt with serious matters. He chose to satirize the hypocrisies of the society rather than mourning them. I couldn't think of any more difference.