Judge Faith - Bus Driver's Buyout; Lover's Quarrel (Season 1: Episode

[@alexiscmyers2014]

It must be embarrassing to have to pay the defendant in a case you filed

[@ToniA5555]

It always amuses me when the person suing ends up having to pay. Some people are so stupid.

[@dimesdeath]

In the first case, the plaintiff's mother looks younger than the plaintiff.

[@WilbertGross]

I was just about to make this comment lol

[@karenoconnor4180]

dimesdeath ... wow exactly what l was thinking !! .. The daughter must have had a hard life.. 🙄

[@unicorn6206]

Same thing I said when I saw her

[@guineapig4701]

Holy smokes, you're right! Wow! Seems like a happy person and that helps!

[@kesharobinson2013]

Yes she looks like a drunk mother looks good for age

[@msknich0le]

Case 2: I learned early to not give boyfriends husband benefits. I don't allow boyfriends to decide what's best me. We're not cohabitating, mixing finances or having relations because wifely duties are reserved for wives. Lady, never let a man tell or show you twice he doesn't want you. He left and I wouldn't communicate with him ever again. Stop being sad and self destructive. A man cannot complete you, only complement. Boss up and become whole because when you find your self worth, (in time) much better will find you.

[@Cece96969]

msknich0le well said👏👏👏

[@SimsMoyal]

you are so smart

[@JNMKlover]

Judge Judy been saying that for decades. Very good advice!

[@FaithSincerePA]

Faith messed up on that second case. He should have had to pay her the full $3700. Why would she allow him to get his money back when he forced her to take a loss ??

[@rowanthomas9181]

Susan Koessler at the ‘go ahead’ part of your comment I heard judge’s faith voice saying that hahaha

[@williammorson1535]

Second case, the woman still loved him, but he didn't want her anymore, very sad. I felt for her.

[@niamarie5656]

The 2nd case, I don't think she is on drugs, I think she is hurt, not only did he take the tuck, and made a profit from it and disappeared, but she has to take him to court, so I think she is heart broken💔 I don't think he loved her, he loved her money, obviously she was the bread winner of the relationship..so sad😔

[@tinagoodwyn8649]

Nia Marie uuuuhhh...she is...i have family members....signs all there love....I feel bad for her though

[@AoiAriBerry]

No, I believe she is just heart broken, too. When you think you can trust someone, and they not only just up and leave without a second though, but they screw you over financially... its gotta mess you up. She still loves him, too. It hurts her to think that he would do something like that. She doesnt know how to act, but shes trying to keep it together.

[@vannahbrogan9621]

This looks very much so like meth use. Not judging but I live in a horrible city and it’s got a massive amount of meth and heroin and I’m just being honest when I say she DOES show all the signs of being high while trying very hard to hide it. I feel badly for her. Gonna buy ‘Er a lot of meth tho 😂 I’m going right to heck

[@LC-se8pw]

Nah, this woman uses narcotics. No judgement from me, but she's coming down for sure.

[@niamarie5656]

@@tinagoodwyn8649 I get what your saying, I have a few family members on drugs as well.

[@Jamie8787]

Second case, i'm sorry to say but that lady looks like she on some sort of narcotic. But I am sorry about her ex leaving her in such a disrespectful manner.

[@sabana7825]

Jamie8787 I agree she has done something to her nose before she came to court. #justsaying

[@milleberitaag2100]

He is a DICK, and she is tired and depressed

[@kaylac804]

Cidalia Perez oh yes. I agree, and I used to be on drugs. Id assume shes snorting pain meds. Makes your nose itch and she keeps messing with it

[@chiakorea6117]

Jamie8787 i was think the same. Maybe crack something heavy she's very fidgety and her nose are runny

[@helema23]

you do know that depression does that to people too right?

[@robinclark1455]

When she said I'm sad, that broke my ❤

[@natashabovell9522]

The plantiff in the second case is so fidgety, something is wrong with her

[@trishurbanczyk127]

Meth

[@alyssadelacruz3197]

Drugs

[@idalarsen2540]

Could also be severe anxiety.. or both, for that matter. I was wondering the entire episode.. she seems and acts nervous with the scratching, having to "air out" her neck from her hair and shirt, way of speaking and general demeanor and such.. all anxious traits. Same goes pretty much for meth and amphetamines etc. as well. I just don't think she looks like she's either used (enough to get those symptoms) or is using. Of course you can't always tell, some people exhibit more obivious traits than others. It could very well be severe anxiety. Like, this seemed like a hard case for her to gi through and many people get very nervous when it comes to courts, police and such. Many people also get really nervous around cameras, especially when they know their personal business is being filmed for massive amounts of people from all over. Especially putting all of this together, there's no wonder some people get really anxious. I'm just saying, I wouldn't be so quick to jump to conclusions. For all we know it could be something completely different completely out of her control (anxiety disorders ofc are also completely out of people's control).

[@nanakadija1557]

Drugs

[@zachtoberen410]

❤❤😂😂❤❤😂😂

[@Bangtanlicious-ev3sn]

Man, the second lady is such a nervous wreck....I feel bad for her

[@yomajesty2703]

Baby that ain’t nerves, that’s drugs

[@doitlikethebereans1690]

I feel so bad for the plaintiff in the second case.

[@fabtv2890]

These mother and daughters really look alike in the 1st case 😍🥰 so pretty

[@sheliapea1387]

She ain't got to be high on nothing. She hurt been done an injustice and nervous on television. She could hv allergies or a cold..some of y'all think the worst. Give ppl the benefit of the doubt. Stop jumping to conclusions. She hurt.

[@OliviaBaeBy]

You don't know a drug addict when you see one. You can be hurt on drugs 🙄

[@coquigirl0789]

Sorry, I’m a recovering addict, and yes she’s on something. Addicts can see other addicts, it’s kinda like a “gay”dar 😂

[@lodigipson1603]

That man was a straight con man and he was wrong for what he did to her. I was glad the judge gave her the money. Good luck to you and God bless you.

[@garfieldwhunter]

He shouldnt have gotten back his full deposit. She took a loss.

[@crishelimani80]

Same thing i say he was the one that sold it for a coke head price...heshould take the lost

[@VirgoCali89]

The plaintiff in the second seemed to be on drugs

[@athena4519]

I’m confused on the second case. I think she should have subtracted the 800 from how much the truck cost. It how much they sold it for. Bc he never had permission to sell it. It’s not her problem that he sold it for less. Now she’s lost money bc of him.

[@henrycoats371]

The plaintiff in the 2nd case is definitely on something.

[@shortytina212]

Second case- Woman is a tweaker.

[@monicaingram2970]

C. R. What is a tweaker?

[@shortytina212]

Someone who uses crystal meth, my dear.

[@kaylac804]

Yeah she is. She could also be snorting pain pills/heroin. Makes your nose itch and shes always messing with her nose

[@lillygirl8436]

Yeah they all got that look.

[@Kv-dk4py]

The first case the mom and daughter look just alike

[@cathylittleton7361]

The plaintiff committed tag fraud

[@zakirae6056]

The second plaintiff is distracting me. I can't even get through this case!

[@yomajesty2703]

I wish the Plaintiff in the second case was on Judge Mathis for one reason and one reason only!

[@perspgold8945]

I detect substance abuse in both the sides on the latter case

[@Natas_Nico08518]

He went to take care of “health problems”🤔

[@omarbagent9829]

She is definitely on something, she couldn't stand still for her life!!

[@colleenthecatlady2344]

Plaintiff's mom looks younger than plaintiff!!!!

[@Theocita]

The defendant's daughter in case one is beautiful. Her skin, lips, she looks amazing

[@marvamclean-dixon5463]

How did Judge Faith come up with that judgment. He got all the money he put in the vehicle while the plaintiff was at a loss. Don't even believe that he sold it for only $3700

[@rbj8387]

Because the bill of sale was in his name, so regardless of how much she/how little he paid for it, with not title signed over yet the bill made it his truck to do with as he pleased. She claimed he stole/forged the bill, but also admitted she never actually looked at it and just assumed it'd been made to her, so she couldn't prove/vouch that it wasn't made to him. To be sure, he was rotten for doing it, just that legally it was technically his truck and not hers no matter how much money she put into the purchase.

[@abilenereese3279]

I also agree that on that second case Judge Faith SHOULD have given the lady her full 5200! I dont believe that he sold that truck for 3700! He probably put that on the bill of sale so that Taxes were lower (bought a cash car and the guy did that). I usually agree with the judge but not this time!

[@Desaraee92]

I will never understand people that break the law and then come into court expecting them to enforce the law. I think she knew damn well that you can't take a plates off of the car that are registered to that car. didn't get pulled over because as soon as a cop pulls up behind her all her information would pop up and they would see that that license plate does not go with that particular car and she would have had much bigger problems

[@LaLa5star]

Some of Judge Faith’s rulings are just ridiculous.

[@zedmak]

LaLa5star which law school did you attend?

[@anniejohnson8910]

For someone who is so called on drugs from ur comments she sure has allot of money to spare on these cars when half of y’all Probably can’t even get a Big Mac 🤷🏾‍♀️ Stop assuming she was hurt holding back allot of emotions I can clearly see

[@mammymountain2057]

I agree addicts don't have that type of money and when they do they use it for drugs

[@hurricaneheli79]

@@mammymountain2057 "Addicts don't have that type of money" Tell that to a cousin of mine that was an addict with that type of $.

[@Platinum400]

I disagree, there’s plenty of rich people that do cocaine and other drugs. Having money doesn’t make you exempt from being a dope fiend.

[@BeeEpic]

I would’ve put her high ass out of my court. Disrespectful

[@theKevronHarris]

At 8:18 the defendant says that the tires are "tire rotted" 😂😂😂😂

[@breesbonnets6798]

HOW many times can the word "truck" be said???.... I feel bad for her, she loves him and he Don t care.

[@tatiibful]

The second case that lady was definitely high off some type of drug.

[@samoea19]

These moms look better than their daughters

[@shaniashanea4279]

y everyone keep talking bout drugs the lady doesn't seem like she on drugs she looks sad and like she's about to cry and really trying hard not I get it's y'all opinions but look again she just looks nervous and extremely sad

[@chelsie1203]

Shania Shanea don’t be naive. She’s definitely on drugs

[@tgadegagarrencha8304]

Oh my God her mother look younger than her. (First Case)

[@ivysmith2794]

2nd case the defendant is utter GARBAGE

[@razikridzuan4662]

For second case, is the calculation fair.. Shouldnt it be 5200/(5200+800) times with 3700, which equates to around 3200? What if the truck is sold below 800? How would you calculate it then?

[@sinwithanejay]

Razik Ridzuan i was wondering that as well I got 3182

[@josephross3926]

Sit the hell down mom✌🏿😂

[@bobcloutier9056]

Yes MANE! Gré Job! Alway’s The Rite Verdict! Thank You 🙏

[@Classy_Lady23]

On the second case What a jerk !

[@wendys279]

The second case, that woman is definitely high. She keeps sniffing and is so sketchy it is difficult to watch.

[@NellieKAdaba]

First case, they're all dolled up.

[@bobcloutier9056]

Yes MAME ! Gré Job! Alway’s The Rite Verdict! Thank You 🙏

[@skylarjaxx2399]

Second case I disagree she should have gotten all her money back I doubt she would have sold that truck for a loss.

[@subicbay25]

case car pmts// defendant took her big mouth to court but no proof that she made payments.

[@cherieprender1030]

he said he went and took care of his health.. obviously they were both using. he took the money to go to rehab hes back and clean she obviously isnt. that's why he cant be with her. but I think faith should have rewarded her the full amount he sold it for still because he took it and bounced.

[@asmarbailey4592]

The lady at 3:19 has me screaming 😂😂😂

[@colleenthecatlady2344]

Defendant two, heartless!!!! Glad he's gone!!!!

[@mikea.m.7846]

I’m sorry to see that: 1- The judge not even doing the math correctly 2- Not even condemning the responsible party the consequences of his actions 3- Missing several legal aspect of the events That’s a shallow judgement should not pass without being noticed

[@rbj8387]

The issue was with no title signed over yet, the bill of sale was in his name. The plaintiff said he stole/forged the bill of sale, but also admitted she never actually looked at it and just assumed it'd been made to he4, so she couldn't prove/vouch that he'd taken it or that it wasn't made to him. He was cowardly and pathetic for doing it, but from a legal standpoint the truck was technically his to do with as he pleased. The amount she put into the truck ends up being irrelevant because it's seen as she helped him buy himself a truck

[@NicholasBlake84]

Second case the blonde is most certainly an addict

[@kimberlylozano2881]

Second case, Why did it matter so much to him if she kept the truck? He only had a few hundred tied into it. Shes renting cars which is alot and wanted a car. He is a heartless, cold asshole! She is lucky to be rid of him.

[@PumaLyn]

We HUNG GOUT?!🤔 It's HUNG OUT!🙄 I AKSED/AXED?!🤔 It's ASKED!🙄 The car was on a flat?!We love you JF!😂🤣😂 Now we know what GHETTO means!😜😂🤣😂

[@MarySmith-xo8gc]

Boy, on that second case the woman was wigging out on drugs! He probably had to get away from her to go to rehab!

[@DreamTheDead]

In the first case why does plaintiff look like my neighbor

[@carminahh8138]

The mom look younger than the daughter

[@AriesAllDay414-mv6ci]

2nd case ole girl looks like a straight knock!

[@shawnzayhale1387]

She clearly trying to keep from crying she loves him n he did her dirty n cant even apologized he has no remorse he coldhearted n the 1st mom definitely look younger n definitely just wanted her 5secs of tv fame lol smh

[@melissabam434]

Something is wrong with the second lady idk what but she’s too into moving and fidgety

[@alanastribling3290]

Second case: I hope she doesn’t spend her winnings on more meth.

[@mschellylove3588]

Alana Stribling you are judging this lady based on her appearance which is wrong. Not good to judge people.

[@alanastribling3290]

Mschelly love Yes I am. Having been in recovery for 32 years and working in the substance abuse field, trust me, I know a meth/crack head when I see one. Did you read any of the other comments? Several people think this young lady is addicted..., just saying. If you don’t want to be judged, don’t go on TV 🤷🏽‍♀️

[@katiemilady4232]

@@alanastribling3290 Congrats on your 32 years! Nothing to sneeze at. Good for you & the work you are doing. Keep it going. 🙏

[@colleenthecatlady2344]

Defendant 2 ice hole!?!

[@NaptuallyBeautifullyMe]

OMG.....Ms Ladie on the left behind the plaintiff....suuuuuuuper haircrush 😍😍😍😍!!!!

[@crystalmurray-weston6372]

So he broke even on the truck, and she lost $2300??? Wtf?

[@susangabel1435]

someone needs to teach that kid to speak properly

[@queenversationspodcast8135]

I love, love, love Judge Faith! Don’t go up in there trying to play with her. I think she should have done her ruling based on the percentage they put in instead of letting him keep $800 of the sale. Despite the defendant being an asshole, the plaintiff is out too much financially. First, he only actually put about $300 cash into the purchase. His $800 estimate is including the work he did. It’s fine to give him that. It should count. That would make their combined investment $6K, with his contribution being about 13%. From the sale, he profited, but in total they suffered a loss. By Judge Faith’s ruling, he was fully restored getting by getting to keep 100% of what he put into it. Add to that the time value of money, all he did was gain, but the plaintiff continues to lose. Since she made 87% of the investment, she should have gotten 87% of the proceeds from the sale

[@paulasch8325]

2nd case; either the USA laws are crazy or it is bad judging. He got away with all his original input. free borrowed money, while she had a huge loss. The loss should have been prorated at a min. and charge him interest. The guy is a low life

[@rbj8387]

The issue was with the title in no one's name, the bill of sale was in his name so he was legally able to sell the car. Even if he only paid $1 and she paid $5,999, if the bill of sale was in his name it was (temporarily) his truck. She tried to claim he stole and/or forged the bill of sale, but then admitted she never actually looked at it and just assumed because the last 2 were in her name that one was too. So she had no proof it was in her name and therefore it was technically his truck to do with as he pleased. Don't get me wrong; he was a rotten low life for doing it, just that legally it was his truck, regardless of how little money he actually paid for it.

[@rydbthatsme]

Women like that who are so insecure need to work on themselves. He left, he's the problem BUT you allow yourself to be attached still

[@glennbeck9496]

"Judge" Faith sucks at math. Why does the guy who put $800 into a truck he stole get to keep $800 and give only $2900 when the person he stole it from put in more than the $3700 he sold it for?

[@michaelbardov6371]

I don’t understand the rationale behind the judgement. She paid $5,000. He paid $800. He actually got his $800 back although he in fact stole the truck or at best sold it at a loss without her agreeing to the sale at all or the price. So he, although in the wrong and quite aware of that, didn’t lose a dime. She, clearly the victim, in effect made him whole and lost $2,100 in the process. Why?

[@rbj8387]

It's because the bill of sale was in his name, so legally, in that moment with the title not in anyone's name yet, it was considered his truck regardless of how much or little he actually paid for it. The plaintiff claimed he stole/forged the bill, but then admitted she never actually looked at the bill and had just assumed it'd been made to her. To be sure, he was a scumbag for doing it, I'm just saying from a legal standpoint the bill of sale was in his name and therefore no matter how much she paid for it, it was legally considered his to do with as he wanted.

[@fayebarnes668]

JF u were wrong on that verdict. He should not have gotten any money on that deal. He should have had to pay her at least the amount she put into it. U allowed him to get all of his money back and allowed her to get shaft. How is that right?

[@tinagoodwyn8649]

She’s put him through a lot...I already know

[@antoinettetapper2785]

Wow he took off with her money steals her money he used her. Man he used her. He never cared for her at all

[@ivysmith2794]

1st case the plaintiff can't be SERIOUS

[@evangelinelebourne3674]

Yhk

[@kathybates8844]

I dont want to sound cruel, but did that lady seem to fidget like she was on something(last case)?

[@rowanthomas9181]

Susan hmm I dunno. Think she was just nervous and sad it had to come to this. But we’ll never know for sure. The guy was just a jerk.

[@michaelbar-dov214]

If the claimant paid §5,000 for the truck which the defendant sold without her agreement, and if he only paid §800 for it, why should she not get all her money back? The fact that he sold it for only §3,700 is his problem. What would the judge have decided if he gave the truck away? Would she then have awarded the plaintiff nothing?

[@rbj8387]

The issue is the bill of sale was in his name, and with the title not signed over yet it was technically/legally considered his to sell, regardless of how much/little he actually paid himself. The plaintiff said he stole/forged the bill, but also admitted she never actually looked at the bill of sale, so therefore couldn't prove it was actually made to her. In short, it doesn't matter how much she actually paid for the truck because the bill of sale was made to him so the law sees it as his purchase. Don't get me wrong; he was a jersey for doing, just that's why she didn't get her full money back.

[@morganbrammer6929]

I feel like she is short 😂

[@deniseholloway]

second case: is she high?

[@johnkoppel9981]

That second case was all messed up that woman should have got at least five grand back she's the one that put 5200 into it he took the car and sold it for 3700 so that means basically if you take a car off somebody your date and just sell it you just got to give them what you sold it for so if I take a $25,000 truck and sell it for $2,500 all I got to give her as 2500 I mean it doesn't make a lot of sense

[@mernafrederick5153]

Need to fire this bailiff and bring back Juan. This is at least the 2nd video in which she said, :The Honorable Faith JACOBS...." Her name is 'Jenkins.'

[@janetrmn]

Merna Frederick no she dont

[@othas3]

Barbara was season 1. Juan is season 2 on. This is a season 1 episode

[@vannem2688]

I heard Jenkins

[@diamondgreenchoreoqueen]

She says Jenkins

[@beastbeast4963]

Both cases seemed to have fair verdict. The 2nd case - the lady seemed like she was on cocaine.

[@oculosaperire4678]

So no ones going to point out the lady in the 2nd case is on some kind of drugs....

[@thepoetking70]

On the first case concerning the use car.... The plaintiff spent that money and did not pay the finance company. I truly believe she spent every single dime it had no intention of paying the financial company for the car that she was already behind 4 in payments. and to have her overweight mother come and lie for her in court is an horrible shame. this is just my opinion

[@edgehill66]

If the mother was slender would it still be a horrible shame?

[@tobiascdngustaf]

.

[@JSmedic1]

Right ... weight has nothing to do with the lack of character.

[@highlander666]

1st case: They can't really be this stupid 🤦‍♀️

[@sidneyhill7064]

No they said $70

[@INDIGO.GODDESS_573]

THE SECOND CASE... THE LADY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE OTHER DOLLARS SHE LOST.. BY HIM SELLING THE TRUCK FOR SO CHEAP.. HIS ASS DIDN'T DESERVE A DIME FOR THE SLICK SHIT HE DID... HE SHOULD'VE TOOK A TOTALLY LOST.. HIS 800 INCLUDED.. CLEARLY THESE TWO HAVE DEEPER SEEDED ISSUE.. SHE LOOKS LIKE A ADDICT AND HE LOOKS LIKE THE RELATIONSHIP JUST WORE HIM OUT.. AND HE WALKED AWAY.. BUT HE DID IT IN THE WRONG WAY..

[@cynthiac.9368]

2nd case: 18:13 Plaintiff: "This is not easy an easy thing to do." Are you kidding me, lady? The guy's a total dick! Delete him from your life! (She was renting cars the whole time? I think she was in the red on all these buying and selling deals but hasn't figured it out yet.)

[@I_Am_Kayyy]

I have never seen Kiara spelled with a Q. No wonder people can’t spell my name right.

[@louiseevans5752]

I bet HE S O L D the truck for way more $$$$ should have asked to show proof of how much he got !!! ///

[@pflanzenliebhaber]

The defendant in the second case looks to me not like a bad person. Probably he sold the car so cheap, because he had to take care of his health, as he briefly mentioned. The two of them really need to talk about everything. Especially because she still loves him as she admitted in tears.

[@anntwanalong4269]

They both were on drugs because he even said he left to go take care of his health meaning to get clean

[@rbj8387]

Pure speculation, but I almost wonder if he owed drug money and was depending on that truck sale to pay them off, so when she said she didn't want to sell it he panicked and took off with the truck/money

[@leetravionblack4131]

Man i dont mean any harm but is it me or does the defendant in the first case Mom looks way younger than she does

[@HighClassPythonS]

You made a bad decision in this case how did u order him to pay 2 gran when the lady pay 5200 n he sold it for 3700 that was a real bad stupid decision you shud of given her 9,100 the lady lost alot of money here first he stold the truck which she paid 5200 so shes to make profit not lose n he sold it for3700 so you add 5200+3700=9900-800 he put wow you made a bad decision judge

[@karasays01]

In the second case is the woman on drugs, the way she keeps wiping her nose and her fidgeting is strange.

[@yung1717]

Glad you can drug test through a screen

[@ruthiemartinez5552]

Definitely.💔

[@reemsakhnini9731]

i wonder if this is like judge judy where the show pays what is owed or do the people actually have to pay out of their own pocket??

[@NellieKAdaba]

No, the production usually pays on behalf of who ever owes the money. Only one time on Judge Judy a defendant paid out of his own pocket.

[@tinagoodwyn8649]

Y do we as black women have to have some dead persons hair on our head? No self esteem....my daughter would be happy in her own if I had one...I have two sons...geez

[@HandbagDiva]

2nd plaintiff has a meth problem