You can get it here US: bit.ly/4e9IVgW DE: bit.ly/MonportGA60_DE UK: bit.ly/MonportGA60_UK Use discount code ""JTMAKESIT" for 10% off as a thank you for watching this video! Not only that, the Monport GA60 is also very competitively priced as you can get great gifts with a purchase, ranging from a chuck ROTARY SYSTEM to a whole CO2 LASER CUTTER, depending on the model and your region! (affiliate links, I get a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thanks for supporting my channel!)
@FiveTrackTape13 күн бұрын
Great video, thanks! In most British English dialects "zed" rhymes with Jed, Fred and Bed.
@balusamys35154 ай бұрын
This is Awesome JT!🎉🎉😊
@sms91064 ай бұрын
This is a cool machine, I have no idea what to engrave but I am a high tech tool junkie > must have!
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@sms9106 I can feel your temptations 😆
@satibel4 ай бұрын
The first test with aluminum I was like "yeah, my 2.5W laser does it" and then you showed the cutting
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
Fiber lasers are truly in a class of their own :) I work with them constantly and I still get amazed every time.
@satibel4 ай бұрын
@@JTMakesIt I wonder how well the tree lasers do (10 6w diodes in a trench coat) If they have similar cutting performance (with obviously slower speed than with a galvo) it may be a great alternative if you don't care about speed and already have a gantry.
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@satibel You mean blue laser diodes? Completely different use case. They can't engrave metals. They are great for cutting wood and acrylic, and can engrave stainless steel or anodized aluminum,. but can't touch brass, copper, zinc, chrome or raw aluminum... I have tested 70W Atomstack blue diode laser recently. You can check out my video.
@satibel4 ай бұрын
@@JTMakesIt I watched it, but looking like it can cut stainless with enough patience, so why can't it cut/engrave brass? Dot size and/or wavelength? do you have a video showing what it can't do? (E.g. stone/brass/raw aluminum etc...)
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@satibel It is the wavelength thing. You can't get around physics. You could get a bit of explanation in some of my older videos, but if you want more scientific explanation you should search the web, kzbin.info/www/bejne/mZ2uZamXn9GGd8U kzbin.info/www/bejne/e2a3fqejmtVseNE
@Safiredesignengineer3 ай бұрын
great video, what are your thoughts of power supply / laser source under the worktable? is this not an area susceptible to dust which may cause longer term issues? I like the look of these machines but it sort of puts me off having the techie gear under the work surface..
@JTMakesIt3 ай бұрын
@@Safiredesignengineer the power supply space is separate from the working surface. The holes on the work bed have no direct connection to the electronics below
@telwood1524 күн бұрын
Very impressive., If you are a keen hobbyist with deep pockets then go for it, otherwise I feel it only worthwhile for business use where you can justify the cost. Also , unless after service is good I wouldn't bother.
@henrytobler2 ай бұрын
I love the advanced autofocus feature-it's saves me so much time! Plus, the collapsible column makes it super easy to transport to different locations. I've tested a range of materials, and the results are consistently impressive. I love it!
@JTMakesIt2 ай бұрын
@@henrytobler awesome to hear that! 👍
@dansv3872Ай бұрын
Should i buy the B6 60w or the monport 60w?
@JTMakesItАй бұрын
@@dansv3872 watch my review of the B6 60W too and decide which one has features and accessories that suit you
@dansv3872Ай бұрын
@JTMakesIt i did but still can't decide ... I like the b6 but the monport has some things too..😅
@JTMakesItАй бұрын
@@dansv3872 Some reported that some Monport machines don't have the JPT MOPA source anymore but an another one. I don't know if it is better or worse.
@DDRThapper31-ys8ji18 күн бұрын
May I know the weight of the machine
@JTMakesIt17 күн бұрын
@@DDRThapper31-ys8ji around 10 to 15kg
@DDRThapper31-ys8ji17 күн бұрын
@ thanks
@airheads244 ай бұрын
Where do you get the test grid files you are running?
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@airheads24 for measuring the laser spot size? I made my own, it is just a different fill setting for each square
@LaserHuset4 ай бұрын
Would you be interrested in loaning me one or more of the older machines you have tested to test on my KZbin channel?
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@LaserHuset sorry, it will be to expensive to ship them internationally
@LaserHuset4 ай бұрын
@@JTMakesIt I'll happily pay the shipping from Slovenia to Denmark, it should be a lot cheaper than buying new machines and more doable than getting a manufacturer to send me one
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@LaserHuset Your channel has no reviews, how should I know that you will make good review? Not trying to criticize, but you should first establish some credibility on your own, then you can expect to do some business with others. I was posting videos for years, before I got my first sponsor.
@LaserHuset4 ай бұрын
@@JTMakesIt That is a fair point, I suppose I should have left the old reviews up until I got going with lasers, and constructive criticism is always welcome To clarify I am trying to get my hands on something to review, not a sponsor, I'll happily pay shipping costs, rental fee, or anything else required including returning the machine when I'm done Unfortunately I am not in a situation where I can afford to buy multiple machines for review and I can't make a proper review within the two weeks return window (and if I could doing that would not be fair to the company I buy from), hence why I figured I would ask you seeing as you were somewhat local on the global scale
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@LaserHusetwe can continue via email (its on my about page)
@Daniel-rz7sh2 ай бұрын
You have sah 175mm but the lens Shows f= 254mm
@JTMakesIt2 ай бұрын
F-Value: The F-value, also known as the F-number, is related to the focal length and entrance beam diameter. For example: FL100 D70x70: F100 (approximately 1:1) FL130 D80x80: F130 (approximately 1.3:1) FL160 D110x110: F160 (approximately 1.6:1) FL210 D140x140: F210 (approximately 2.1:1) FL254 D175x175: F254 (approximately 2.54:1) FL290 D200x200: F290 (approximately 2.9:1) FL330 D230x230: F330 (approximately 3.3:1) FL380 D250x250: F380 (approximately 3.8:1) FL420 D300x300: F420 (approximately 4.2:1)
@Latuya-y1n4 ай бұрын
Compared to idode idk atomstack
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
I tested infrared diode atomstack too.
@Latuya-y1n4 ай бұрын
@@JTMakesIt if Soo which is better for paper cotton ?
@JTMakesIt4 ай бұрын
@@Latuya-y1n for paper you need blue diode laser. Fiber is not good for paper