⚫🔴 Juri, Master of the Revue - Historic Brawl [MTG Arena]

[@Waste_MTG]

Subscribe!

[@bryantkapono4241]

Here are a few cards this deck might like Bonehoard Dracosaur Dragonspark Reactor Reckless Fireweaver Oni-cult Anvil Marionette Master

[@Waste_MTG]

Good suggestions!

[@miiilkie]

A little while ago I made a Queza, Augur of Agonies deck that revolves around drawing a lot of cards and making opponents lose life from it. I think its pretty neat and I would love to see you make one with her!

[@Waste_MTG]

Oh yeah definitely, I own that card in paper, seems like a sick commander

[@nomakym]

I was thinking the ozolith would be good here.

[@Waste_MTG]

Yes it would!

[@CliftonDavis-je7qu]

I created a phyrexian altered Juri, changed at the Alter. cost one colorless mana & one hybrid red or black mana phyrexian shaman menace whenever a permanent from anywhere is sacrificed Juri, changed at the Alter gets a +1+1 counter when juri changed at the Alter dies it Deals damage Equal to its power to any none land target permanent or player destroy the permanent and any copy of it can't be regenerated 1/2 also phyrexian altered equipment the equipment Are from a Grafted warger set includes Grafted Exoskeleton both equipment are changed altered by the phyrexian juri changed at the Alter, They have the same equit cost as before only Grafted warger Equip 0 at sorcery speed to a creature you control and (0:Attach at flash speed to any none land permanent you control. also made a phyrexian altered enchantment arua raged vains trials Target opponents creature is indestructible all damage delt to that creature with the aura ragad vains trials attached to it target's that player of said creature.

[@MagicAndMeyham]

bruh, you keep running too few lands in all your decks. you want to have about 30% lands, so ~33 for commander decks but dont count the mdfc's in that count. been the most glaring mistake i keep seeing you make.

[@Waste_MTG]

But MDFC's are lands. Why do you feel they shouldn't be counted in the land count?

[@MagicAndMeyham]

@@Waste_MTG because most of them are tapped lands an I hate tapped lands lol. But seriously they are more beneficial as a land as a "just in case I didnt draw land" and not solely selected in deckbuilding as a land.

[@Waste_MTG]

It's an interesting deck-building philosophy topic for sure - I feel that the drawback of having a tapped/shock land is more than made up for by the ability to add extra spells in the deck.