The first 5G country will be Japan or Korea. Not HK, since HK operators are still lack of frequency. Japan and Korea already trailed for some years already. In addition, most 4K technology are controlled by Japanese and Korean companies, 8K were mostly controlled by Japanese, 2020 Olympic will be 8K. However, limited TV sets support 8K, but you will find them in the market 2019 or 2020. Autonomy driving will not be so exciting for recent years because there are lack of infrastructure (roads, 5G base stations, insurance, maintenance etc) supports. Instead of may be some automakers will introduce L4 kind of Autopilots models for selected countries only. Unfortunately, there are lots of companies tied 5G with Autonomous driving together, which they are different technologies development, only AI may required ultra high speed networks, otherwise 4G is enough for the short coming years. The first couple years of 5G will be lousy as not enough coverage of base stations, software is in mature, antenna technology problems etc. may even not as good as current 4G network. Huawei only has some advantage on SDR ( software defined Radio) on Macro Cell, and micro cells as they have years experience on this. In addition, may be SDN ( software defined network) as Core networks, as China Mobile given them profitable contracts like BOSS, BTS. Hence, they could marked their price at a very low level to kick Other people out. Of cause, there are a lots of under table deals as well. This is the main reasons why they don't listed. In this extend, ZTE is better than Huawei.
How many people could afford to spend so much money for the sake to get leisures, entertainments and communications??? Of course, 5G infrastructure is definitely excellent, but seems is similar to the high-speed train in China and the A380 giant aeroplane, both keep losing money projects.
A380-> Hub 2 Hub flights, large volume PAX, 貴賓多-》頭等、商務。special boarding gate required, limited airports could handled. Hence, CX was smart not buy any of this shits , and focus on wide body, twin engines like B777 and A350, you will find most aircrafts are with RR engine which is the best in the market today. Those brought A380 were government owned, and possibly with political reasons. Chinese aircrafts C919 for short hauls, B737, A320, Shukui21, ARJ90 and a few more; C929 was planned to play roles of A330, A350, B787, B797. Again, the problem is Engine, there are no Chinese Engine yet although they make a shiploads of claims. At the end of day, reliability, comfort and fuel economy are the challenges. They are long way to international market. The 3rd country for civil aircrafts may be Japan, because of they have a lot of associated technologies and experts.
@@Henrylo281 個問題係佢放出嚟個價同埋個價係唔一樣 另外仲要睇下放咗幾多錢入去做研究放咗幾多人力物力 同埋每一隻賺幾多唔係空中巴士賺曬全部錢 好簡單講一句 好似阿聯酋航空 一個引擎都已經賣1200萬美金 你講緊差唔多半億就已經落咗去引擎嗰度 唔計其他零件 同埋蕭生都有講 佢哋嘅目標係1000台飛機以上 咁而家買咗二百幾 咁你話係咪失敗? 同埋你唔可以將a380同埋747比較 始終747唔係由零開始研發嘅飛機 R and d 方面唔會好似a380咁 需要更多嘅錢 所以蕭生話a380 係失敗絕對冇錯
@kckong74335 жыл бұрын
@@Henrylo281 航空零件供應商,由準備到投產,普通都要一年半載。部份主要零件,要特登投資起間廠。所飛機生產,唔係話開就開,叫停即停,兩年時間就係用黎Shut down 成條 Supply chain。相反要Start up ,亦要錢要時間。今日AirBus 宣佈兩年後停產,就冇可能再開番。仲有,A380 四億歐元一架,呢個只係 List Price。冇人會用 List Price 去買飛機,380唔叫好賣,比人壓價就必然。真正成交價格,隨時只係得 List Price 一半。賣250架,比你執到 200 億Gross Margin都算偷笑。硏究成本,A380 保守計要三百億歐元。未計Internal Return Rate, 已經座底唔見一百億歐元。如果唔係,Airbus 主席都唔會話呢個係"痛苦決定",壯士斷臂呀,明未!
@greathorton5 жыл бұрын
@kantch lo, 你要先了解什麼是ROI (Return of Investment) 一家企業必要的
@kckong74335 жыл бұрын
@@Henrylo281 朋友,普通汽車生產線,每分鐘造一架車,你去買一架咁多,緊係冇位比你價講。飛機生產線,每個月都未必造一架,點同。Civil Airliner 成交價係廠商 List Price 一半,過去十多年,行內大部份人如是猜測。今年Airbus 公佈業績,因為歐洲會計新規定,要公佈埋訂單Net Value 。大家一睇,發現真係只得去年Delivery List Price 嘅一半左右。已經冇得呦啦。