7 FACTS For Better Image Quality - Megapixels, Resolution, Image Sensor Size, Photosites???

[@TheKillingTreeTT]

Wow. What a well delivered, in-depth video about the topic. Very well done. I felt like I went back to university :).

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Cheers Denis 😂

[@jotablen5978]

Same!!!

[@backfilms1953]

My university is all about student to teacher sex incidents. I didn't leave much cos of that

[@donschiffer7400]

I think the law of diminishing returns plays a roll in most aspects of photography. Megapixels were a huge factor when going from 3 to 6, or 6 to 12. But the improvements from 50-100 aren't anywhere near as dramatic. The same is evident in lens improvements, noise performance, sensor size and other areas. For most people the sweet spot for most of these things is somewhere in the middle.

[@MJ-uk6lu]

Same with sensor sizes. Past one inch type sensors there massive diminishing returns. APS-C is definitely better, but much less obviously than going from 1/2.3" to 1". And going from APS-C to full frame offers even lower gains.

[@lornanjanja6837]

I will get back to this in the morning. Equipped with a notebook and pen😂

[@takundachitakatira5319]

Lol😂

[@peter9962]

Yes, I will be doing the same thing.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Hi guys, just a correction to note please - at 13:50 I explain how to calculate megapixels by dividing by one million but at 14:09 when I repeat the calculation I accidentally say one thousand instead of one million. Sorry my bad 😬. Thanks to a couple of our viewers for pointing it out.

[@messylaura]

thank god you made a mistake, i was thinking you were a God....................:)

[@ChannelAA]

Shoudn't this number be 1,024 as opposed to 1,000? Thanks.

[@returntohome330]

This is a great video for those new to photography, it took me a few years to put all this information together for me to draw on when needed. This video is pure gold as a learning tool great job saves me explaining it to new photographers!.

[@cottonbomb8272]

It's cool, I've noticed that during watching and I actually felt relieved because of that: this guy is still a human 😂 phew

[@OccultDemonCassette]

Also, there were APS film cameras available before digital crop APS-C became mainstream. "Advanced Photo System Type-C (APS-C) is an image sensor format approximately equivalent in size to the Advanced Photo System (APS) film negative in its C ("Classic") format"

[@speterlewis]

As always, this was top-notch. Your knowledge and ability to deliver it so we can all understand it is as good as it gets. My only caution for viewers would be to not dismiss smaller sensors out of hand because of perceived lower image quality. While technologically and mathematically true, in practical terms, it isn't always relevant. Case in point is my own 30+ year career as a photographer, which, for the last 15 years has been done successfully using digital APS-C cameras. For the type of work I do, my clients have been overjoyed. Are there limitations? Sure. But I've learned to work within them and have been able to consistently produce, not just "good enough" images, but excellent images. I may well get cameras with larger sensors in the future, but not because I want to "upgrade," but just because I want to be able to do different kinds of work. Keep up the excellent training, Karl. You are absolutely one of the best teachers out there!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Yes good points Peter and there were photojournalists even using film formats smaller than 35mm back in the day, however my main point was that as we see an advance towards mirrorless and less expensive sensors we may see a reduction in demand for that format and at that time the camera manufacturers may choose to drop that format in favour of 35mm FF mirrorless. As always with everything it's will come down to a supply/demand/cost equation.

[@speterlewis]

@@VisualEducationStudio Thanks, Karl. Appreciate the response. I'm excited to see where technology leads us!

[@kreygscott]

My head literally exploded watching this. Now I'm going to need to get an ice pack and watch it 3 more times to fully understand it. That being said this has been the best explanation I've seen thus far on image quality. Cheers Karl.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you.

[@thomastuorto9929]

Everything comes into account. Camera processors ,software/firmware lens choose. But the pixel design, size & pitch mean so much., & is what really makes the difference. Somewhere out there there is a comparison chart of all the Nikon & Canon cameras with the features & individual pixel size & pixel pitch. If you look at the cameras that were performers, the closeness of the larger pixel size &, the pitch numbers is what they had in common.

[@messyfilms6325]

If you’re a newb you should be watching and reading some more introductory stuff.

[@matteodemattia]

absolutely the clearest and most complete introduction to digital photography I have ever heard. Congratulations!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@cmichaelanthonyimages2197]

Great explination. Much to know. Where as one time the mantra was "its not the equipment but the photographer"...but in the digital world, it is equipment as well, in where the knowledgeable professional will make much better use of the higher end equipment.

[@afalco54]

A little correction: the Olympus Pen series used half of the 35mm film, that is it was a "cropped sensor camera". And there are more sensor sizes. The most prominent sensor sizes today are the ones used in phones and they are much smaller than these. And there is the four-thirds sensors.

[@ACitizenOfOurWorld]

And APS format was actually created as a film format

[@BarryCarlton]

And let us not forget 110 film, as well as the Minox camera.

[@thaitopfitness]

What an amazing video. I'll be sharing this with all my friends who want to know how to take better images!

[@valueforvalue76]

The megapixel race reminds me of the early 2000s when intel convinced everyone that the more GHZ your processor had the faster your computer ran. The general public like nice round simple numbers to equate to higher or lower quality. 3GHZ is obviously better than 2.6GHZ unless you take into consideration processer design and efficiency. :)

[@frostybe3r]

IPC.

[@iSleepDoc]

In such a short time you did an amazing job of explaining the best info about the most important aspect of photography… Image quality!!! Bravo 👏 👏👏

[@tanweercaa]

Superb video Karl, excellent collection of information in an excellent way, great job🌷

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you Tanweer 📸

[@gpdoyon]

Mind blown!! Thank you very much for the excellent way you presented this material. I learned a lot!!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@returntohome330]

Photography is really an Allice in Wonderland rabit hole, when you think you have leant all one can possibly know a mentor appears revealing a whole new world to explore within...

[@Dannysubliminal]

Hi Karl, I haven't seen many of your videos in a while, I forgot how detailed and unbiased you are, as always, your videos are straight to the point, informative and easy to follow. You are still one of the great masters. I felt this this video in areas was a bit of a rant, but rightly so, a great argument and made so much sense, yet again, from the thousands of videos I've watched, I learnt from yours the most. Cheers, Danny.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks Danny much appreciated

[@howeryuen]

This is gold in regarding to photography knowledge, thank you so much.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

My pleasure!

[@jozefgeusens44]

That was indeed educating and good to hear it all in one place, Karl! To give an example: As an amateur who has been photographing since the 70's, I have (at some point) finally decided to buy a 24 megapixel full frame to digitalise my slides and black and white negatives. Why 24 MP? Because my older DSLR with 12 megapixel didn't reproduce all details from the fine grain b/w negatives and even some from my Kodachrome 25 slides (possibly 21 MP would be enough, but that camera didn't provide the needed dynamic range). To capture the whole dynamic range from those slides without losing on highlights or deep shadow areas, the full frame took care of both because of the larger photosites. Also, because I already had an expensive macro bellows and slide duplicating system, I could re-use it with my digital camera. Of course I also get excellent - technical - results in conventional photography because of that camera, but I am happy to use my older gear with older lenses because they still give me that much pleasure in photographing. Which I think is a tad more important than having the newest, highest technical quality - especially because I don't have to work towards a customer's goal. And that is what you, Karl, have mentioned quite often in your videos: you choose your gear in function of the result, which is of course replying to the needs of your clients. I thought I might emphasise this one more time ;-)

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks Jozef.

[@jaypoly]

14 minutes in and Karl is just after a job on Countdown.....alias clear and concise information as always. Brilliant. Lens wise is interesting to note that in cinematography these days a lot of DP’s are using older lenses such as K 35’s, usually re-housed. These illicit diffractions and aberrations are sometimes wonderful.

[@unalozmen526]

APS stands for Advanced Photo System. This is a film format that was introduced in 1996.

[@BenoitLamarche]

Right, and the APS-C sensors r are the same size than the film used in APS Kodak cameras.

[@61republic]

This is the best explanation about the crop and full frame difference. Thank you!

[@thekrewfan1235]

This is the best explanation i've seen so far on image quality vs resolution

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you.

[@paulyoung4998]

Thank you for clearing up all my doubts.

[@emanuelschimpfossl5919]

Congrats to 500.000 subs! :)

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you.

[@jotablen5978]

How did I miss this one? Mr Karl!! I'm going to show off a little bit now: my PhD in Optics is coming back in ways you'd never understand! Every MASTER-CLASS you provide in your channel is a blessing. I really hope sometime somebody can explain the new generations in this way every single matter! Welcome back to reality! It's just Karl Taylor doing it again! Regards

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you. Damn I wish I'd done a PhD in optics!

[@HDEFMAN1]

Some very solid information here. thanks Karl

[@danvonerlea]

APS-Advanced photo sistem was used by Kodak film for some time.I had a kodak camera with APS FILM.

[@seandempsey9396]

APS AND APS-C ARE DIFFERENT IN SIZE, APS-C IS SLIGHTLY BIGGER.

[@martynphillips6646]

Not one um one er, so not only is Karl a master photographer but a consummate speaker. Superb tutorial.

[@IvanMaras84]

Fantastic and great value information Karl. So well put together too! Best wishes and stay safe.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks Ivan

[@elmoqbobo]

excellent video instruction manual. i w ll go over it again to learn more. thank you!!

[@davids8766]

Excellent presentation. Very clearly put across.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you kindly!

[@GaWajn]

That was refreshing. Actual knowledge sharing as opposed to opinions sharing. Very informative. Thank you

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks but I have to say I also share my opinions from time to time too 🤣

[@RiaKnight]

VISUAL EDUCATION, This was most instructive, thank you. 👏

[@PerEng2405]

Thank you! for explaining and elaborating on in particular sensors. Much appreciated.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful!

[@ILOVEMFEO]

karl, this is really super helpful (even though i may need to watch the vid 3 times to let all the info sink in :) ) just subscribed!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@dejtaf]

Thank you Mr Taylor, great knowledge! But it a little sorry because you didn't mention about foveon sensor.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Is anyone still using foveon sensors?

[@dejtaf]

@@VisualEducationStudio yes, the construction of foveon is similar with film. So it still has large amount of fan :).

[@abdulhasibtamim6905]

Very thorough and informative with no wrong info at all. Only mistake would be in 14:15 you divide the numeric value by 1000 instead of 1M to calculate the Megapixel counts. As an electronics engineer I would like to point out some overlooked yet powerful factor behind image quality that you'd missed to mention. (i) In electronics we call photosite as photodiode. Quality of photodiode is the most important factor when it comes to image quality. And photodiode quality is determined by quantum efficiency and saturated current/dark current. In short quantum efficiency is the efficiency to convert the photon to electric current whereas dark current is the leakage current during no photon hitting the photodiode. So higher quantum efficiency with lower dark current yields higher quality of the photodiode. As the technology is getting better and better every day the photodiode quality is also getting better. One perfect example would be nikon D700 and nikon Z6. Each photosite size in D700 is somewhat double the photosite size of Z6. If we only consider the size of the photosite in these case, then it would make D700 sensor much better - but in reality the experience is quite opposite. As Z6 has latest generation of photodiode that makes the D700 a rookie in comparison with Z6. (ii) The circuitry is important. With the advancement of the technology circuit reaches in nano level and as a result consume less power while producing less heat. So with the elimination of heat, dark current and heat noise become negligible which render much better image quality. (iii) The quality of a digital image varies from device to device when viewing them. While an image in 10bit Adobe RGB LED display looks perfect, the 8bit sRGB LCD display could make the same image less dynamic with some pixel clipping and banding. So even though quality of the digital image file was good but poor quality monitor presents the file badly. The same is true for printed image. Better printer with better quality of ink in a better paper produces better images. As simple as that.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Ahh yes, maths was never my strong point 🤣 I think people get the idea.

[@bhaskardevkonwar]

Nice rendition of the concepts.Thanks and wishing you a happy new year 2021.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Same to you

[@LeopoldoManuelRamirezMena]

Very good explanation 🎉... It is incredible how many photographers don't understand difraction, aberration, etc... 😅

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you liked it!

[@alanplatt888]

A very comprehensive explanation of things I think I need to consider, to improve my comprehension of capturing a better image. Thank you.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful Alan

[@bp-blackshark]

And even that is only a part from the quality chain...it will also depending on the ability from the graphics card from your PC/Laptop, on the monitor, on the printer (how many different inks will he use), on the quality from the pigments in the ink, and on the quality of paper you will use for the final product. Lenses, Pixels/Sensorsize, a certain algorithm (aka camera brand) and RAW is nice, but without the final product, it`s only something for pixelpeepers with a 4k Monitor (8k will coming soon, lol!). The RAW data is only the "digital" Color Transparency Film, the storage medium. But without a printed Photo, you didn´t end the full cycle of photography.

[@peterlewis3038]

Very late after the release of this excellent video, but i was wondering if you have any views on the foveon sensors as found in sigma cameras ?

[@johanacardenas4546]

What an amazing video. All of the information you presented is so helpful, detailed and easy to understand! Thank you.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@ctretta]

Brilliant description of so many concepts. Thank you Karl.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@gurkandegirmencioglu9881]

I think you forgot one big factor which is software used , that can make great difference as we can see with iphones and the other brands. I meannfor example artificial bokeh, eliminating noise with software exc..

[@buleulek5153]

iPhone?

[@roycejohnson929]

Have to say the Olympus is a Micro 4/3, not just a crop sensor if that makes sense !

[@sunsettaye4820]

Your gift of knowledge is appreciated. Thanks for sharing with us!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

My pleasure!

[@michaellekas27]

Fantastic video. thank you so much. You summarized everything elequently and precise. Your explanation of the subject matter helped fully grasp the concepts fully. Thank you again

[@VisualEducationStudio]

You're very welcome!

[@pvandck]

An easy way to explain pixels in relation to sensor size is with signal to noise ratio. The smaller and more densely pack the pixels are, the more their electrical signals interfere with each other, creating noise visible particularly in low light situations.

[@janisbb6418]

Dynamic range is NOT number of steps. It is ratio between largest and lowest value. Number of steps used to split dynamic range is called tonal range.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

In practical terms 'tonal range' is the resulting quality of 'dynamic range' and this video is about the contributing factors to image quality, if you think the audience watching this video wouldn't have understood what I meant by 'steps' when it comes to dynamic range contribution to image quality then please give up some of your time to make a video that explains it more clearly.

[@viktorpaulsen627]

​@@VisualEducationStudio > "In practical terms 'tonal range' is the resulting quality of 'dynamic range' " These two concepts are different. The teaching is confused. "...please give up some of your time to make a video that explains it more clearly" It's easy. 1. Dynamic range is the difference between the brightest and darkest that can be registered. Show two illustrations, one with high contrast and one with low contrast. 2. Tonal range is how many steps the scale can be divided into. Show the illustration that you used for dynamic range. (he-he)

[@klausschuster2855]

outstanding overview of image quality factors to take into account. Love your professional and analytic style of providing key point knowledge

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Much appreciated!

[@glennmiller2103]

At last ! finally complicated information I can understand. Well delivered, easily understood and clear. Thank you ...I have subscribed and will use you as my "go to" youtuber.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Awesome, thank you!

[@Paul_Wetor]

This week I learned a *big* lesson about sharpness. My amateur cameras are mostly point-and-shoot and Micro 4/3. After disappointing results with two full-frame cameras, I discovered that: 1) For full-frame, aperture is important. With smaller zoom cameras, I would look at shutter speed and let aperture take care of itself. I did some tests with my FF cameras and found the "sweet spot" of sharpness. 2) A book I found yesterday said that *point-and-shoot cameras will give you much more depth of field* than a larger-sensor camera. No wonder I took aperture for granted! There should be videos to train people like me who are going from smaller cameras to bigger ones. Real photographers start with bigger cameras and don't have to learn this hard lesson.

[@kennethjonesphotography]

This is the most relevant information I've ever found to help me better evaluate my next camera and lenses. Thank you very much for such a very comprehensive explanation.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful

[@MadsPeterIversen]

Very great video, Karl!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Many thanks

[@arielc2010]

BEST educational clip about sensor-size and image-quality that there is. Thnx Karl :)

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you.

[@terryjones6049]

Thanks Karl for a brilliant video, just saved me a pile of pocket money. Happy new Year.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it helped

[@tonyhales-BigT]

Super interesting 👌🏻 thank you very much.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you liked it, thanks.

[@prosunsport1]

Excellent overview.

[@bonsaibob8253]

As always Karl gives us a plethora of information. Easy to understand, remember and put to use. Thank you Karl!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks Bob.

[@LebronPhoto1]

In the days of film, they had something called the Olympus Pen, half frame camera. Cope sensor could be a little deceptive because in the case of Olympus, the camera was built around the sensor size, unlike the first digital DSLRs from Canon and Nikon and even Kodak, that were modified 35mm film bodies. Those were actually cropped because you had a 35mm camera body and lens, but used an APSC sensor. But where the camera body and lens is designed for a specific format, it isn't really a crop sensor camera. nobody calls a 35mm camera a crop sensor camera given that Medium format is larger. Great video.

[@carlvalle8539]

except that isn't what it means

[@Luigi13]

It is a photographic school at its best. Thanks Karl, I enjoyed it and it is refreshing to hear it again. This format requires some good attention too.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@ebrahimfaiz8522]

it is good to get explanations from a pro. educating.

[@necrotat2]

Thank you, I learned a few things watching this that I had no idea I even wanted to know... Now I need to learn even more!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful!

[@andhikazanuar]

very helpful 👍🏻

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks

[@donpayne1040]

Great video. I used to work at Jessops and have had my grubby mitts on a bunch of camera, so when opening up an e-commerce site years later I thought cobbling together a lens+body that would yield results comparable today's trend/standard. Not the case. I too disregard pixel count more than regarding the contribution of what a decent lens and lighting make, but this is the only video i've found which details "image quality". For example, my old 20d cannot render the same image "quality" as a 70d even in at the same pixel resolution.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks Don.

[@alnoormeralli]

Great review. Sensor design is so important. Also a great point about demosaicing processing between camera manufacturers using the same fabricated sensors. Data processing for higher than base ISO may be another important factor.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Many thanks

[@zenaxproductions7927]

Nr. 1 influence on image quality - light!

[@danerlea7318]

APS,advanced photo sistem was made by Kodak for film! It's very good size and the lens are smaller and lihter.It will survive the bigger sizes.

[@peterwilson7532]

Great summary, definitely not for beginners. Twenty minutes just flew by.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful!

[@IRG_fotografia]

Thanks a lot Karl. Cheers from Brazil

[@VisualEducationStudio]

My pleasure!

[@tracyleepitre6079]

Thanks so much for sharing this info!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful!

[@NikosPer]

i was searching yesterday about ''Super resolution'' and how to imitate pixel shift from Pentax cameras, and your video pop uped in the right time. Thanks for the info.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Great cheers.

[@NeilCorke]

No 1 photography educator!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Cheers

[@darlingtonjonesimagery9247]

Really want to join your class again Karl. I was a member last year and it helped my food photography so much but man, I'm so busy with work and home schooling. But I want to join again. Learned so much

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks.

[@solomonunya9700]

Thanks Karl for an awesome delivery

[@VisualEducationStudio]

My pleasure

[@philfyphil]

Bloody ‘ell, I bet your courses are good :-) you have a great gift of getting information across in a way it can be retained.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank you and yes they are!

[@helisoma]

I'm in scientific and medical imaging and I'd have to say that your presentation is lucid, thorough, and that you would make a good scientist 😁

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thank's Tom, I love science, read New Scientist every week and lots of science papers!

[@videodarshan]

Very much useful information thank u so much sir

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Welcome

[@MexBytes]

Very Informative!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad it was helpful!

[@arifkizilay]

It only needs a high dynamic range and the elements that reinforce those physics.

[@johnl4469]

G'day Karl. Another video chock full of useful information. Thanks mate.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks John.

[@danilogarcia4406]

Thanks for sharing great information always. Definitely your videos are the best in photography formation.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you like them

[@koroshghanbarzadeh1360]

Very informative, thanks for sharing.

[@garymorrow9324]

That is the best training video I have ever watched. Just terrific. Thanks you!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@lauchos3]

Excellent video. Thanks

[@VisualEducationStudio]

You are welcome!

[@LanielPhoto]

What about the factor that some cameras use square sensors with very little loss of "data" in between the individual pixels (ie:Nikon) and those that use round sensors with all the loss of "data" in the empty space in between the sensors ? Is it true, or is it all a con by certain advertisers ?

[@VisualEducationStudio]

I'm not quite sure what you mean here.

[@LanielPhoto]

@@VisualEducationStudio - Saw a show that stated (and showed) the Nikon sensors specially made for Nikon have square sensor pixels leaving none of the empty space produced by the typical round sensor pixels. This supposedly resulted in less loss of detail and cleaner images. It also stated that Nikon has also developed a brand new sensor for video with the same characteristics. I can understand the concept (less loss of detail, maybe better dynamic range) but do square pixel sensors really exist ?I know my Nikons give me better images (in general) than my Canons, but I just assumed it was their X-speed technology. Another factor was bit-depth. I shoot in 14 bit, but some cameras only have 12, 10 or even 8. How much difference does that make in your analysis ? Anyways, a great video on your behalf. Enjoyed it!

[@MA-jm3fu]

Nikon D700. 8+ micromtre Pixel pitch. Still a champ after all these years.

[@jayzn1931]

Very informative video! I do think you got something quite wrong at 18:18 though. The graphic shown is representing bit depth, not dynamic range. The brightest and darkest colors are determined by DR, but the steps inbetween are determined by the bit depth. What you are saying is correct, just what is shown in the graphic is wrong. Cheers!

[@shaniranikauboj]

Wow. Thanks for in depth video on this. I am subscribed!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Welcome aboard!

[@dizzydira9695]

What a Class ..thank you Mr Taylor

[@VisualEducationStudio]

thanks dizzy.

[@surfing4theloveofit]

That was great Karl, i wish i had a teacher like you when i was young, i leant so much from your video, I'll keep watching your channel, cheers rick from Australia. Have a great Christmas ☃️👍🏻👍🏻😃

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Hello in Australia Rick and thanks for your comment.

[@alxdava2004]

Excellent abc for photography

[@VisualEducationStudio]

thanks

[@beanghosh3195]

Just awesome this video and your knowledge!!!!

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Glad you liked it!

[@SimplySavageReactions]

11:38 "While More megapixels do technically equate to higher resolution, it does not necessarily mean better image quality or higher resolution." OK so let me get this straight, a camera having a bunch of them megapixels does result in higher resolution images, but that doesn't mean that that a having a bunch of megapixels results in images with higher resolution, right? Damn I'm smart!

[@kilohotel6750]

Megapixels are definitely not the most important thing. I shoot with a 50mp Canon 5DSR and a 20mp Canon 1DX2. The images from the 1DX2 look so much better most of the time I only use the 5DSR in certain instances now.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

Thanks for the info.

[@terjebrattelid7574]

Amazing tutorial. Thanks very much for sharing your knowledge.

[@VisualEducationStudio]

thanks

[@Astro.004]

Very informative but you should have shown more pictures of the things you where talking about especially during the lens portion you should have shown us examples of what a bad Vs good lens look like

[@jasonrich8074]

I just got a olympus sp-600Uz was that a good choose?

[@sbai4319]

Thanks Karl. You have. Informed what I knew for over a decade; Camera manufacturers should go back to the drawing board and work on issues such as noise, size of pixels, density of pixels and dynamic range. Cheers and thanks Steve Bailey

[@VisualEducationStudio]

That's right Steve and thanks for watching.