Karna was EVIL not बेचारा, BR Chopra's Mahabharat is wrong | Ami Ganatra

[@ayushpanwar9507]

Iam so sad that people don't read Mahabharat and compare Karn with Arjun. There was nobody like Arjun and here Iam not saying about warriorship but as a whole personality. He is ardhnarayan himself

[@DhruvJain108]

Kalyug hai bhai. Krishna ji ne kaha tha ki kalyug mai log asli dharm ko bhool jayenge

[@swastman2]

BR Mahabharata and other tv serials glorified Karna but in Vyas Mahabharata he was different.

[@ranjeetsingh-kl2vp]

यह तो देवी जी बड़ी ही शालीनता से यह बता रही हैं कि कर्ण कोई मुख्य भाग नही हैं महाभारत का । ऐसा भी कहने वाले अपने आप को बहुत ही ज्ञानी समझते हैं जब किसी इतिहासकार से पाला पड़ता हैं तो छूमंतर हो जाते हैं ।

[@nik10gaming]

mrutyunjay aur karnayan padh le samaj mein ayega karna kon thaa..

[@hemantagrawal4778]

कर्न ने मित्र धर्म निभाने के लिए अधर्म का सात दिया और धर्म स्थापना करने के लिए स्वयं के प्राण अर्पण कर दिए .जिस माँ ने उसका त्याग कर दिया उनकी 5 पुत्रों को जीवित रखने के लिए स्वंय के प्राणों का दान किया.

[@the_IND_33]

*_Half knowledge is always dangerous than no knowledge_* - Knowledge is important ❌ Only Right Education is important ✅

[@Divine.mystical]

Lets debate over karna if you think you have full knowledge..

[@Bhardwajshivbhakt]

​@@Divine.mystical leta do

[@shikhasidney844]

Yes. That's what happened in Abhimanyu's case.........

[@sganesh2958]

@@shikhasidney844 karn killed abhimamyu, not tortured him like others because he knew that he is Arjun son, Abhimanyu karn ka putra samaan hai, Duryodhan just want to just want to torture him thats the entire idea of chakravyuh. Karn gave him the peace by killing foremost

[@nagavamsip]

@@sganesh2958 Please don't believe in TV serials. Please read the granth. Karna, after running away from Abhimanyu twice in the Chakravyuha, ganged up on the boy and unfairly destroyed his weapons, armor, chariot and killed his charioteer. When Abhimanyu picked up a sword and a shield, they were also destroyed. This was agreed to be a gross rejection of dharma by everyone else including Sri Hari.

[@purusottamsethi5885]

When Lord Krishna has praised Karna in many occasions, we should not listen others. If Karna was so bad, after his death how he got place in Swarg?

[@paxonite-7bd5]

Duryodhan also went to heaven, what are you smoking?

[@anujasmartphone1627]

@@paxonite-7bd5 And what about the part where he was praised many times by the Lord himself?

[@ganeshahire5576]

PLEASE READ GRANTHAS

[@anujasmartphone1627]

@@paxonite-7bd5 if you have read Mahabharat, then you haven't understood it's message. It's marma

[@naliniranjanpatra809]

Bro, you saw Karn in swarg? You were gardening there?

[@blackandwhitebharathistory]

Some brainwashed people think she is defaming Karna 😂 people please read Mahabharat and stop watching these fake TV serials.

[@Bhardwajshivbhakt]

Aapne padhi to ek debate ho jaye

[@yashwardhantubid2581]

Chalo Bhai source batao 😂😂

[@DivyanshYadav-ti9eb]

Yes u need this stop watching sonyputra

[@abhilash8798]

Ye defame hi kar Rahi hay ... Isko Ghanta kuch ni pata hay Karn ke bare may ... TV serial ka chodo ... Jo bolte hain na KARN acha ni tha ... Then prove it ... Kahan pe likha hay ... Ek mic pakad ke sab apne appko vidwaan Maan lete hain ...

[@abhilash8798]

Abbe tum log Jo ake comments karte ho ?? Sach batao kabhi MAHABHARAT jesi MAHAPURAN ka Front page bhi dekha hay???

[@adornis0078]

Karna shows us the mirror....what most of us are in our lives... The learning here is to recognize such behavior in ourselves....

[@Vishakha_B897]

Well said.

[@trilokyamohanchakra6351]

😅kuch bhi? Karna was a castiest himself

[@medicalkira9350]

Bhai aa gye padh kr 😂 an btao 2months m kuchh mila krna ke bare m btane yogya baate 😂 pahle serials dekh kr apni mansikta bna lo fir yha aa kr gandagi failao. Tell me one thing brother jisse m arjun ko hate kre bas ek chij bta de 🙏

[@megha977]

People are so busy in judging karn was villain.. but not understanding his emotions turbulence..anyway it is upto them..onething I observed here is if you have all in your life that is birth status, caste status, money status they think that arjun was great..if they dont have all of that they feel like karn was great.. At the end they are forcing us judgemental and take stand who was right and who was wrong , if every one is good on earth how do you differentiate good and bad. but krishna himself told that don't judge anyone in mahabharat but understand and adopt good deeds of it.now a days more intellectuals are becoming judges In youtubes..

[@trilokyamohanchakra6351]

@megha977 so him disrespecting women is okay? If tomorrow a child tapist says I have emotional trauma, that's why I did this with child, will it be okay?

[@kumarabhishek1244]

😂😂😂 aur aaj kal k non readers be like Karn hara nhi haraya gya tha😂😂😂 He was on side of adharma obviously he will lose...also Arjun was the greatest ever warrior accept it

[@learnforsurvival1208]

Karana haraya hi gya tha be

[@AmanKumar-dc4iy]

​@@learnforsurvival1208ye bewkuf ko kya pata😂

[@Seaoffactsandnews]

​@@AmanKumar-dc4iybhai me itna hi bolunga ki me Mahabharata padh chuka hu or ye jhoot bhi nahi bol rhi or purn sach bhi nahi hai half knowledge hai bhai

[@OmmSantoshBehera-fg1ch]

agreed he was on adharm side.....khudka dimaag use kar na sri krishna the arjuna ke side aur jaake puran padh sri krishna mentioned the warrior infront of you arjun isnt a normal warrior

[@vikramaaditiya6578]

@@AmanKumar-dc4iy sabse bada bewkuf toh tum log ho jo yudhistir ko mahatma bolta he jo juwa khelta he

[@rajeshpadhi2075]

Most people have not read the Texts, only serials.

[@anjaneyamarut868]

Majority comments here are from ignorants who have not read a word of the Mahabharat. - Both Krishna and Karna were set adrift in the river after birth. Krishna grew up in a simple, poor household, with a loving family but also lived in a perennial shadow of death from Kamsa. Krishna grew up as the most lovable child, whose childhood antics we fondly worship till this day. He realized his own self as Virat Vishwa Roopi Yogeshwar Paramatma at a young age, and yet despite all his powers remained the most humble and down to earth human being, who we worship today. - Karna, on the other hand, grew up in semi royalty. His foster father Adirath was not any commoner, and most definitely not poor or vulnerable. Adirath was a powerful figure in the Kuru kingdom, a close confidante of King Dhritirashtra. A Sarathi was equivalent of a modern ship or aircraft captain. Adirath was himself a Kshatriya and a descendent of the royal family of Anga, which is also why Duryodhan later crowned Karna as the king of Anga. Despite growing up in royalty, Karna was full of arrogance and jealousy. - In terms of age, Karna was older than all other Kauravas and Pandavas, and much older than little Arjun, who was far younger to him. Yet Karna always felt jealous of Arjun. Imagine in today's times when a 18 year old tries all dirty tricks over a 8 year old. Such a person would rightly be called a Bully.

[@anjaneyamarut868]

Karna's skills as an archer are highly overrated by ignorant modern commentators. - The most powerful warriors at Kurukshetra were Bheem, Arjun, Satyaki followed by Dhrishtadyumna, Abhimanyu. Even Yudhishthira, Nakul and Sahadeva were great warriors. On the Kaurava side it was Bheeshma, Drona, Ashwatthama, Shalya, Duryodhan and Kripacharya. Here too we see how vile and arrogant Karna was. He sulked when Bheeshma became the commander of the Kuru army instead of him. Bheeshma himself knew how vile Karna was and did not accord any importance to Karna. Karna entered the battle only on the 11th day after Bheeshma fell. - Forget Arjun, who was far more powerful than Karna, Karna was not even a match for young Abhimanyu. Karna was one amongst many who ambushed and killed poor Abhimanyu in the chakravyuha. If Karna was so powerful why could he not defeat Abhimanyu one on one? Why was he part of the ambush? This was the turning point of the war. From this point on, Krishna removed all shackles from Bheem and Arjun, and they finished the war within 5 days. - Modern commentators also wrongly think that Krishna pleaded with Karna before the war to save Arjun. Krishna only gave a last chance to Karna to salvage himself out of respect for Kunti. Krishna always knew how vile Karna was. There was not even a chance of Krishna thinking Karna was better than Arjun. Krishna knew that Karna's arrogance would lead him to his own end. - When Karna's end came, Krishna's message to Arjun was that this vile character deserves no mercy. He is the one who insulted Draupadi on multiple occassions, who continuously coaxed Duryodhan into this war, who mercilessly ambushed and killed Abhimanyu. This is why Arjun finally slayed Karna.

[@abhisheknahar7363]

@@anjaneyamarut868 oh shut up brihuchod. 🤣🤣

[@abhisheknahar7363]

@@anjaneyamarut868 oh get lost arjun got his ass ripped by robbers in dwarika and abhimanyu was beaten in multiple group attacks.

[@abhisheknahar7363]

@@anjaneyamarut868 i like how your bori ce ended and starplus started in the end of your comment.

[@kundanchhabra]

Karna was a "token". This word can explain him a lot. He was neither good nor bad but simply a token or became a token due to Duryodhan offering him a small village to rule to make him a raj instead of sur-putra. Thus he became a token and acted accordingly.

[@Vvk11vv1]

Esa nhi h bhai, ye false narrative hai.... Sutputra was not any low position.. He was a very well respected & powerful person even before becoming king..

[@kundankanan9074]

@@Vvk11vv1 "Shayla's initial response to Duryodhan when he was asked to be Karna's charioteer. "Knowing me, O monarch, to be so capable, of afflicting the foe, why dost thou appoint me to the office of driver in battle for such a low-born person as Adhiratha's son? It behoveth thee not, O king of kings, to set me to such mean tasks! Being so superior, I cannot make up my mind to obey the commands of a sinful person. He that causeth a superior person arrived of his own will and obedient from love, to yield to a sinful wight, certainly incurreth the sin of confusing the superior with the inferior. Brahman created the brahmanas from his mouth, and the kshatriyas from his arms. He created the Vaishyas from his thighs and the Shudras from his feet. In consequence of the intermixture of those four orders, O Bharata, from those four have sprung particular classes, viz., those born of men of superior classes wedding women of classes inferior to themselves, and vice versa. The kshatriyas have been described to be protectors (of the other classes) acquirers of wealth and givers of the same. The brahmanas have been established on the Earth for the sake of favouring its people by assisting at sacrifices, by teaching and acceptance of pure gifts. Agriculture and tending of cattle and gift are the occupations of the Vaishyas according to the scriptures. Shudras have been ordained to be the servants of the brahmanas, the kshatriyas, and the vaishyas. Similarly, the Sutas are the servants of kshatriyas, and not latter the servants of the former. Listen to these my words, O sinless one. As regards myself, I am one whose coronal locks have undergone the sacred bath. I am born in a race of royal sages. I am reckoned a great car-warrior. I deserve the worship and the praises that bards and eulogists render and sing. Being all this, O slayer of hostile troops, I cannot go to the extent of acting as the driver of the Suta's son in battle. I will never fight, undergoing an act of humiliation. "-- he considers it an act of humiliation to be the charioteer of a low-born Karna. What are you talking about.

[@Miracle-gs8qj]

Well for just information The small village that you're talking about is not small as this village is called as karnal now the city where i am from and there are 144 villages that come under karnal So its not a small village but quite a big land

[@Red-Hood12]

Karna wasn't Over Glorified in Dwapar Yugaa, but he is Over Glorified now, as today's people have much more deep understanding and wisdom of Karna's character than Dwapar Yugaa's - peoples, rishi-munis, brahmins, warriors like Drona and Bheeshma and Gods like Krishna and Hanuman etc. who always stood by the side of Pandavas🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. I am seriously not getting this- How KARNA FANS have such a grave and profoundly deep understanding of someone’s character, far better than Lord Krishna?

[@someshwari_debi]

Karan ye he ki sab khud ko Karn me dekhte he

[@Red-Hood12]

@@someshwari_debi Then I should be on top of that list of those people due to my life conditions, but that's cheapness, because Hindu Dharma never support victimhoodness, rather one should always trying to be better person than blaming the society or destiny for his adversaries, and that's what real hero's nature is - which Arjuna had, that's why Shri krishna supported him. The irony is that Shri krishna himself had faced much suffering and hardships in his life, who would he complain to??? There is another term for victimhoodness - "Emotional Fool". One of the core fundamentals of Bhagwat- Geeta teaches us how to be an Emotional Intelligent by standing and facing difficulties in any kind of adverse conditions, if they arrive, BUT SHOULD NOT COMPLAIN ABOUT IT (which Karna used to tell the most). That's what Shri krishna always used to teach Arjuna and other Pandavas. This fact is hard to digest for many people, but that's what makes a man a real hero.

[@Red-Hood12]

@@gopalverma1689 Nahi bhai nahi chalaataa..

[@Red-Hood12]

@@gopalverma1689 ... sacred-texts.com/hin/maha/index.htm logicastra.blogspot.com/2017/02/proof-that-bhima-conquered-karnas-anga.html?m=1

[@Gamingtest-RTX4050]

Bro I personally feel karn as more inspiring than any character...I accept he has done mistakes but jst think..the major mistake was kunti,s why did she not tell the truth tht karn was her son in the right moment..due to her he had to face lot of difficulty..when karn was in difficulty only duryodhan helped him so karn helped duryodhan and faught frm his side ..whts wrong in tht..on top of tht karn was a most cursed character and had to face lot of difficulty throughout his life.. becoming a warrior with so much problems is not easy..arjun had everything.. krishna was on his side ..he got all the education.. everything..so him being powerful is not tht big deal..karn inspite of so much obstacles faught arjuna and almost defeated him.. once krishna saved arjuna frm his one arrow..I beleive in reality karn was so much powerful than arjun but his curses made him weak..on top of tht karn was a biggest dhani..he even gave his kavach and kundal to Indra ..why wouldn't u love such character

[@CAJP21]

Karna was not evil Son of Lord Surya and Kunti but only thing make him wrong is his accompaniment

[@adarshkulkarni182]

Bhai padhlo kamse kam!!! Ye sab bakwas to nhi kroge!!

[@santumondal5501]

😅

[@the_IND_33]

​@@adarshkulkarni182 DRON-VADH PARVA CHAPTER 1132(155) BORI CE© Gita-press Mahabharat 180 ghatotkachaparv "ब्राह्मण्य : सत्यवादी च तपस्वी नियतब्रत रिपुष्यपि दयावंशाच्य तत्मात् कणों बृशः स्मृतः " ।। २४ ।। • meaning : - " कर्ण ब्राह्मण भक्त, सत्यवादी , तपस्वी , नियम और व्रत का पालक तथा शत्रुयो पर भी दया करने वाला है ; इसीलिए उसे बृशः ( धर्मात्मा ) कहा गया है " ।। २४ ।। *• He is devoted to brahmanas. He is truthful. He has engaged in austerities. He is devoted to his vows. He is compassionate towards his enemies. It is for these reasons that Karna is known as Vrisha*

[@Divine.mystical]

Calling a queen veshya is itself a evil act during dwapar yuga..

[@omeglefunny3023]

​@@Divine.mysticalas Sikh i read Mahabharata by Ved vyas and yes karna was not good but Pandavas were worse... Karna was treated ill due to discrimination that's also a fact and he was rejected by Draupadi by calling sutputra.. also Pandavas lusted for draupadi hence Kunti ordered them to marry her so that no fight happens between brothers. I seriously don't find any morale good amongst Pandava and even kauvaras

[@nageswarasastry6150]

Karna was not so noble. Karna was hand in glove with Duryodhan for insulting Droupadi and accused her by calling her "immoral" at the time of vastrapaharan.

[@sganesh2958]

@@nageswarasastry6150 tab unlogoko kya kehte hai jab unkey patni ka vastra nikalthey samay kuch nahi kiya, Galat karne valo se us galti ko na rokha bahut bada aparaadi hey usko kya bolenge aap. Ha karn galat kiya woh usko bhi pata hai, wohi krishna ko bola tha ki kaun kaun wus sabha mey anyay mei hei un sabhi ka dand nischay.

[@RP-qs1tp]

@@sganesh2958bewakuf saare unke Duryodhan k slave ban gaye the after losing. Slave k saath aisa vyavhar bhi galat hai. Koi daasi hai matlab uske vastra utaro? Koi rokega nahi toh yeh kaam sahi ho gaya? Dimag hai tum log ka k doosre ki galati ko use karte ho to justify 1 bahut badi galti? Bhagwan khud Pandav k saath the isliye! Dimag se paidal tumlog serial dekh k Karan, Duryodhan ko defend karne lage ho

[@sganesh2958]

@@RP-qs1tp wah bhai wah jab pandavo ka galtiya hai tho apko defend karney keliya sab kuch sahi hai woh daasi hai tho kya woh maanav hi hai na Aadmi hi hai na, koyi bhi Aadmi uska Aurat par yesa khaam khartha hai tho kamush koyi nahi hoga konsi paristhidi bhi ho daasi bi ho ya na, Aur kya bola bhagwan unkey saath hai ganta saath tha woh sirf draupadi ko raksha kiya kyunki draupadi ka saath anyay hua jo bhi pandav ka saath hua woh unka karm ka phal hai. Tum jaise log bahut biased and partial hotey hai jab pandav ka bhi galti hai tho aap mantey nahi kuch bhi bakwas reason boldheye justify karney keliye. Mere pandav sa koyi nafrat ya dushman nahi hai mera favourite yudhishthir hai, Mai uska galatiya manjoor sachayi bhi manjoor. Vaisey hi karn mai bhi achi hai aur burai, tum. Kya dhekna chahte ho usme hi tumhara jeevan ka dhekney ka nateeja hota, Aur kisi wor character ko hype karney keliye kisi aur ka character ka assasination karna bur hai

[@RP-qs1tp]

@@sganesh2958 khamoshi is the kamzori from situation. Uska matlab yeh nahi k koi takatvar kuch bhi kare. I think you have lost all common sense. According to you British were right to rule us because we allowed it

[@baatthookpeetke3457]

Karn was a good man

[@Rjgamerz-fy7wf]

Who's after the Kalki movie...

[@prithvirajchauhan3007]

This was not kalki movie but Sonyputra karn in kaliyug movie

[@prithvirajchauhan3007]

@ItsVivi2007 same here bro this is kaliyug yaha villains ka jay jaykar hota h

[@IndiaAgainstSlaveryIAS]

I think this woman is presenting a very simplistic understanding of the characters of Mahabharata

[@IndiaAgainstSlaveryIAS]

@ItsVivi2007 yes but the whole point of Mahabharata is to portray "dharmsankat" ie an issue where it's hard to tell what is the right thing and what is the wrong thing. In this podcast she never comes around to explaining why Yudhishthir is not to be judged negatively for literally gambling away his wife at the same time she's quick to paint Karna as an absolute villain

[@manishpanigrahi4539]

@ItsVivi2007 is not on karna .... time laga but kalki hi lead karega

[@NikhilBijarniya-r2e]

A question: Why dronacharya ask eklavya his thumb? ask this question and you can imagine each one individually?

[@suprith5443]

I thought drona was wrong there but amogh lila prabhu gave another perspective which might not be true but made sense. Watch his video.

[@Sweetisgood]

Dronacharya asks for eklavya thumb not because of Arjun but because of different reason Eklavya was the son of general commander of magadha and was definitely gonna become next commander At that time magadha and hastinapur were enemies So if he taught eklavya and then his teaching would be used against hastinapur and that would be deshdroh It sounds unfair to some but to dronacharya who was very loyal towards hastinapur it was the only way

[@Sweetisgood]

@MidNightChill-xn7zm it was not a possibility Magadha has always been a volatile kingdom It's almost like India sending a weapon to Pakistan There may not be a war but it's just a hopeful possibility It may seem drona wronged eklavya (which he at certain level did) but it was definitely for greater good

[@Sweetisgood]

@MidNightChill-xn7zmand again eklavya wasn't threat to drona but to whole hastinapur

[@jadejabrijrajsinhh]

He did it coz dornarcharya was loyal to hastinapur and eklavya was the commander of his enemies "magadha"

[@spmmca]

Those who valourize Karna have only a half baked understanding of Mahabharata. Karna is an extremely complicated character (which requires a lot of time and maturity to decipher) and Ved Vyas uses him very intelligently in the epic.

[@Wisdom_heritage]

And u have put in full time and effort?

[@vivekpadman5248]

@@Wisdom_heritage I have , he was the real hero of mahabharat

[@Wisdom_heritage]

@@vivekpadman5248 exactly. Even after krishna himself giving karna the highest admiration, these wanna be in spotlight freaks keep trying to come up with something

[@vivekpadman5248]

@@Wisdom_heritage bro sometimes I feel these arjun Bhakta are like muslims, very blind

[@FijiksPat]

​@@vivekpadman5248- real hero of mahabharat my ass 😂😂😂 Karn andhbhakts are so funny 😂😂

[@shikhasidney844]

Karan Johar: The flag bearer of nepotism in Bollywood. Indra, Drona, Kripa: The flag bearers of nepotism in Mahabharat.

[@hrithikkumarsinha5604]

How can someone tell the exact line and in exact sequence about any topic given to him, if he/she is telling from her inner knowledge and not on any rattafication ?... Bcoz if i ask any priest sant and gyaani even theh cannot tell me the exact thing and in exact sequence...then how can she able to tell all these things in exact manner in multiple podcasts...??

[@haripriyagohainboruah7292]

Coz usni padhi hi hein .. damn it.. usne isi topic research Kiya.. toh tumko kya lgta hei ki wo ESI hi bolingi kya... Thora sa yukti se baat Kiya Karo bhai

[@RoArLioN143]

Rattafication lol bhai unhone utna time Diya hai tab itna yad hai ok na jab ved vyas ka Mahabharat padhoge na to tumhe bhi knowledge hoga

[@kkr434]

@@haripriyagohainboruah7292 LOL KOUNSA RESEARCH MAINE PADHA HAI UNKA BOOK SABSE GATIYA HAI NIYOG KO GLORIFICATION KARTA HAI.

[@arupjyotisarma976]

Priest lougo ko aajkal sirf Mantr padhna aata hain lekin Bhagawad Gita ya Mahabharat unhe bhi yaad nahi aur reason bhi yeh hain ki unhe time nahi milta ye sab padhne ka kyunki Puja mein busy rehte hain. Actual gyan humein researchers se hi milega

[@TheeeAP]

Because archaeologist have find it out by carbon dating in kurukshetra

[@shyamkantverma1262]

Ami Ganatra ji 🙏 for a Nice Presentation . One Situation is confusing in Mahabharat . Why Arjun could not kill Karn in the last battle till he was armed if he was superior ? Why only when he was armless ?

[@anjaneyamarut868]

Arjun was a very compassionate man, even as a warrior. The entire gist of the Bhagawad Geeta is because of Arjun's compassion and emotions towards his opponents. It shows the heart of a kind and good human who stayed kind towards even his enemies in the most adverse situations. Only once Arjun lost his temper, this was at Jayadratha, who was responsible for Abhimanyu's death. Arjun had single handedly defeated the entire Kuru army, that included Bheeshma, Drona, Karna, Ashwathama etc. in the battle of Virata. Arjun's ability was far superior than all others, with the only exception of his elder brother Bheem. Arjun and Bheem towered over all other warriors at Kurukshetra and the Kauravas never stood any chance, especially after Bheeshma fell. In the final battle with Karna, Arjun showed the same compassion. Arjun was far stronger and yet stayed defensive. One should interpret these only as war tactics. There are dialogues between Arjun, Krishna and Bheem during his battle with Karna. Both ask Arjun to not show compassion and vanquish Karna. Krishna even tells Arjun to use his Sudarshan chakra if he wants but Arjun refuses. Bheem tells Arjun that if he is feeling compassionate, he himself will vanquish Karna. All these events lead eventually to the chariot wheel episode where Karna begins lecturing about fairness to Krishna and Arjun, and Krishna finally reminds Karna of all his evil acts, and tells Arjun that such a person deserves no further compassion from him. 🙏

[@s_rox5042]

@@anjaneyamarut868Well put man !! 🙏🙏

[@munniupadhyay6392]

​@@anjaneyamarut868If Bheem was so strong, then why was he defeated by Karn in the Mahabharat war and Karn had to spare him for keeping the promise he had made to Mata Kunti.

[@anjaneyamarut868]

@@munniupadhyay6392 Come out of these fictional TV serials. What is this fiction about Karna defeating Bheem? I have the Sanskrit Mahabharat in front of me and I can read Sanskrit. Please quote me the shloka where this happened. Bheem was focused on the Kaurava siblings, he had no inclination to get involved with Karna. Karna was one of many who ambushed and killed young Abhimanyu. If he was so great why could he not defeat even a kid like Abhimanyu? Forget Arjun and Bheem, they were far more powerful, Karna was no match even for Abhimanyu.

[@nagavamsip]

Please understand that Karna was not unarmed. He was cursed to die after losing his knowledge of Bhargavastra and became niradhara (no chariot). Even after his chariot wheel was stuck in mud, Karna continued fighting with Phalguna while on the ground. For example, he fired Brahmastra on Phalguna who countered it with his own Brahmastra. Phalguna fired Agneyastra on him, which he countered with Varunastra. At the end, he was unable to stop Phalguna's Anjalikastra, which beheaded him.

[@Pragyaaaaaaaa]

Sister has personal issues with karna😂

[@nakulsingh5293]

Book bechni hai na, controversy to chaiye hi😂

[@coffin789-if9pl]

Kalyug hai didi yaha sab Aisa hi hota hai 😂

[@nagavamsip]

Why do you think she has personal issues with Karna?

[@prasanthsai5120]

Yess she hates him bcz he called a whore as a whore 😂😂

[@krkutube66]

Oh. Looks like you have personal issues with original Mahabharata written by vedavyasa

[@sesh7357]

Without getting into how good or bad Karna was, one thing i found unacceptable was that he promised Kunti that he wouldn't kill 4 of her sons - He did not have that right as he had already promised his friend Dhuryodan that he would do whatever it took to win the battle for him. Even if you are the greatest Daanveer, you can only give something you have - when Kunti was begging for her sons' safety, Karna gave away something which he did not have

[@rhitickdas1790]

Bro miss ami ganatra missed many things in this podcast streaming about karna. There are Several facts about karna is greatest Archer among all of them in the battlefield. Second point lord Krishna committed that karna is a greatest Archer and also has that capability to defend Arjuna. So my request if you telling about untold facts about karna than you should mention about his plus points there are Several things you missed up mam 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@anjaneyamarut868]

@@rhitickdas1790 Karna is nowhere close to the greatest archer in the battlefield. This is just fiction created by some modern writers. Karna is one of the principal villains of the Mahabharat. There is a teaching why the eldest son of Kunti, Karna, is the villain and follower of Adharma whereas the five younger ones are upright and followers of Dharma. The greatest warriors in the Mahabharat are clearly mentioned by Krishna in the Geeta. Nowhere Krishna acknowledges Karna as better than Arjun. Arjun and Bheem tower over all others in the battlefield. Next are their sons Abhimanyu and Ghatotkacha. The only warrior on the Kaurava side who could match them was Bheeshma. This is why when Bheeshma was commander, the battle was somewhat even for 11 days. After Bheeshma fell, Karna came into the battle because until this time his ego was sulking. Satyaki, Drishtadyumna were also stronger than Karna. Arjun was way ahead, Karna was no match even for young Abhimanyu. Karna was one amongst many who ambushed and killed young Abhimanyu in the chakravyuha. If Karna was so great, why could he not defeat Abhimanyu one on one? Why did he have to be part of the ambush? Abhimanyu fell on the 13th day and this incensed Krishna and the Pandavas so much, that the Pandavas vanquished all others within the next 5 days.

[@priyansukarmakar9787]

​@@anjaneyamarut868 It's just your opinion . You read Bori CE Mahabharat And then definitely you realised both dark and glittering sides of Karna Fact is Mam just telling about his dark side . And to know Krishna's opinion on Karana you read Drona Parva ( Ghottotkacha Vadh) okkk

[@priyansukarmakar9787]

​@@anjaneyamarut868And yes in Bori you will find the exact same phrase " Karna supreme among those who upheld Dharma " okk ( in Debroy version ) Remember Bori - considered most researched Mahabharat which clarify Karna being Drona's disciple , many times instigated Duryodhana and all these things mam had told but apart from many good things about him also mentioned in Bori .

[@sanjananair7884]

​@@rhitickdas1790krishna only says that Karn is better so that Arjun doesn't get arrogant. If krishna really believed so then why did he not says that anywhere else. Infact when karn tells Arjun to follow dharm and not attack him, krishn immediately shuts him up about how much of an adharmi he was and he has no right to ask Arjun to follow dharm. Krishna proceeds to order Arjun to kill Karn. About danveer, Karn was already warned about Indra asking for kavach kundal, he knew his kavach can only help save him but won't help in killing Arjun so in return he asks an Astra that would kill Arjun. If he was so capable why did he ask for a specific weapon to kill Arjun. Not to forget Arjun has defeated him twice alone.

[@tattvamasi2852]

Karna was a rakshash in his past life, belongs to rakshas community. he was supposed to be killed by nar and Narayan i.e Arjun and Srikrishna. In previous birth he was blessed with a boon ,he misused the boon then it was decided as he was a very powerful warrior of valour,he would be killed by the 100th arrow of Nar& Narayan after demonstrating his valour so that he dies with respect but cunningly he escaped the last arrow. That was the arrow which beheaded him in Mahabharat and he got mukti from rakshas kul. His jealousy, pride killed him.

[@omeglefunny3023]

Yeto iscon ki bakchodi hai Mahabharata kahi bhi nahi likha esa

[@sganesh2958]

@@tattvamasi2852 ok tab Arjun ka kya tha uska pehle janam, yudisthir ka bheem ka nakul sahadev ka sya yea sabhi log bhi devon ka Amsh they, yea kabhi bhi nahi bolenge aur kahi bhi nahi hoga kyunki koyi bhi lika nahi, just character assasination karney kelliye kuch bhi kichidi pakakey boldhetey, sirf karn ka pehle janam pata tha dusro ka nahi

[@technikdhanuk4773]

@@sganesh2958 sahi kaha bhai character assassination ke liye kehte hai ki veshya bhi bola tha kaha hai proof ye sab aaj kal ke translations hai Actually to sage ved vyasa ji agar koi aisi epic likhenge jisme ek Vishnu ji ke avtar ka bhi part hai to wo wahi side likhenge jo ki jeeta ho to yudh pandava jeete Aur sage ved vyasa ji pandava aur Kauravas Dono ke dada ji the Fir harivamsa bhi unhi ke dwara rachit ek text hai jisme unne Sri Krishna ke bare me likha hai Ho sakta hai ye poori Mahabharata Pandav ke prospective se likhi gyi ho jo ki jeevit the aur other side ka koi bacha hi nhi tha apni kahi batane

[@s.vaishnavmenon6814]

This was made up by ISKON, nar and Narayan were Maharishi so they never engaged in any war

[@saumyavigaya4441]

Arjun always used divine bow "Gandhiv" but Karna always used ordinary bow. When Karna used "Vijay Dhanush" on the last day, Arjun realised that Karna was as great as he was. Krishna saved Arjuna from certain death from Karna three times. I have never mentioned Karna 's kavach kundal

[@aviralrichhariya1550]

show me any proof from any authentic version of mahabharat

[@MrDevil643]

Aur tu bc karn ka sarathi tha sb pata hai padh Jake Mahabharata

[@NursingEducationbyRashmi]

Arjun had pashupatastr of Lord Shiva just read about it what Pashupatastr could do. No weapon was even near to it. And Arjun himself was an incarnation of lord. So how can Karn could defeat him. Before the ultimate war, Arjun and Karn had many face offs and competitions where Arjun emerged winner

[@divyanshkakran8227]

Also arjun took a oath that he never use divine weapons by his own side.

[@MrShaikhtanweer]

@@saumyavigaya4441 hahaha all rubbish, inspired by tv serial lies, Karna was not even 10℅ of what Arjuna was, Arjuna was called Vijay, Dhanjay, he always defeated Karna one on one or in group, never ever in original ved vyasa Mahabharata Arjuna defeat mentioned . In all Bramahand except Lord Shiva no dev , rakash, aur manager could defeat Arjuna, U may sympathy karn as tragic hero but he was more evil than duryodhana U can not change the facts

[@cricketgalaxy6350]

ARJUNA in kurukchetra - Guided by God, loved by enemys like PITAHMAH and DRONACHARIYA, with his Gandiv, with Agni Dev's chariot, protected by HANUMAN KARNA in kurukchetra - Guided by enemy's uncle, hated by his own team members, without his Kavach🛡 coursed by PARSURAM, coursed by DHARTI MATA, he promised to KUNTI that he never kill PANDAV. still killed by cheating👏👏👏👏👏.

[@roshankarkera7290]

Bhram mein jeene vaale murkh..half knowledge is something which is more dangerous and not only you but there are many here in this comment but what grabbed my attention was your comparison between the warriors..Karna was the one who actually brought all that upon him it was never Arjuna he was the one who plotted the varnavrat incident wid Duryodhan he was the one who Ran away while Duryodhan was Captured..he was Defeated in Draupadi Swayamvr by Arjuna...Also Virat yuddh where Single Handedly Arjun fought with Karna Who had Kavach Kundal plus the Support & Protection of Duryodhan, Drona, Bhishma, shakuni etc still he lost 😂😂... Now let me break ua delusion which u are living in all Thanks to Vijay Dhanush that atleast that final Battle he was able to stand in front of Arjun because the Bow had certain Speciality just like Gandiva uske vajah se voh tikk gaya nahi toh possible nahi tha uska tiknaa

[@neraajshahi502]

​@@roshankarkera7290u r right

[@rajanchauhan4912]

If karna was not a good person Then why he would spared his brother life He could have been killed any of pandavas any other than arjuna?????

[@nagavamsip]

Suyodhana also loved his own brothers and mourned their deaths in Kurukshetra. Rather a low bar, wouldn't you say?

[@Nachiket_upadhye_23]

Lol

[@mintubora5991]

Mahabharata Granth read koru... Bhim aur Yudhishtir ne bhi Karn ko jivan dan dia tha... Bhim ne toh bht bar use hara kar chor dia tha Arjun ki Protigya ki man rakhne ke lie Proof - (4th Khand Vyas rachit Mahabharata)

[@pranavpillai396]

Because he promised to mother kunti that he will only kill arjuna

[@losingwatcher2939]

​@@mintubora5991bhim ka samajh gaya par karn ne kyon vardan diya...agar wo evil tha to maar deta bhim ko....

[@adityaraghavan4224]

Very simple question. Why didn't Maa Kunti reveal that Karna was her eldest son? War wouldn't have happened.

[@sakkoyaba4482]

Bro never quesfion mythologies things happen for the storys purpose

[@nagavamsip]

You're asking this because you had the advantage of hindsight. Kunti mata never foresaw a disastrous war as a consequence of her silence. The first time she saw Karna after leaving him in the river was when he was displaying his skills, and she fainted. After that all she knew was he became a king and was living a great life. Why would she tarnish her and her family's reputation when all seemed well?

[@nitinkohli1301]

And she would be ostrecised

[@keerthanking9447]

If karna is weak then she is saying only three people can kill kichaka it is Karna, Balaram and Bheema then what about Arjun? If he is so storng just a question so if anybody know answer then plz tell me🙏🙏

[@manikandaniyer8570]

Bhai ye log views badhane ke liye apna khudka mahabharat likh rahe

[@sibanipanigrahy5509]

​@@manikandaniyer8570she sites examples from the original texts. So please counter with the texts from original text if u want to disprove her

[@sabyasachipanda9459]

Bro usna karna ko weak nhi kaha unsa karna ko evil kaha joki wo ha just like bhisma na kaha tha despite his skills I won't consider him a maharathi because of his evil nature

[@sahilpassi9230]

She is talking about maal yudh and she had taken wrongly name of Karan here might be she want to say duroydan

[@luciferaoi8188]

She said mistakly bro...if you had watched original 1 and half hour video of hers then she had mistake her words 2 and 3 times

[@dvaiticsciences]

Ami Ganatra ji... Just wanted to bring to your notice that the only three warriors who could ever kill Kichak are Bhimasena, Balarama and Shalya (not Karna as you mentioned in this video). Ref: Mahabharata, Virata, 29.19

[@dr.anaB777]

I think that was a slip of tongue because she was talking about karn. She also said karn instead of arjun in the video once. This podcast setup might be new for her. Her knowledge is so in depth and complex in comparison to the very basic questions the host is asking that she wants to say all the things that she has in her mind to clear out these outrageous misconceptions which probably led to this tiny slip up.

[@niveditamishraji3338]

​@@dr.anaB777 she don't know anything she was a bussinesswoman

[@dr.anaB777]

@@niveditamishraji3338 lol she is way more knowledgeable than you. Keep hating. The only person that hate would affect is you.

[@dvaiticsciences]

@@dr.anaB777 Perhaps you are right. Being a follower of Veer Bhimasena and an adherent researcher of Mahabharata myself, I really admire her knowledge.

[@abhaysingh-sc5bk]

Lord ram and krishna fought against adharm and now people are idolizing them is such a shame

[@SheelaBhardwaj-rl6cw]

Jo log karn ko pure evil/kayar /baleen kahte hain ye lo sabut Aagaye padh ke Mahabharata 😂😂😂 Here are some lines from Vyasa's *Mahabharata* that highlight Karna's power and abilities, presented in Sanskrit along with Hindi translations. ### 1. **कर्ण की युद्ध कौशल और शक्ति:** **महाभारत, भीष्म पर्व, अध्याय 4, श्लोक 3-4:** **संस्कृत:** ``` कर्णोऽस्त्रेषु महाविद्वान् कृतास्त्र: सुतप: स्वयम्। महेष्वासो महावीर्य: साक्षादिव हुताशन:॥ 3॥ न नूनं सत्त्वमस्यास्ति योऽस्य वीर्यमधीशयेत्। न हि शक्तो रणे वायुरप्येनं सहसा हि॥ 4॥ ``` **हिन्दी अनुवाद:** "कर्ण अस्त्र-विद्या में महान विद्वान, तपस्या करके स्वयं दिव्य अस्त्र प्राप्त करने वाला, महान धनुर्धर और महावीर्यवान हैं, जैसे साक्षात अग्नि।" "निस्संदेह ऐसा कोई नहीं है जो उनकी वीरता को चुनौती दे सके। युद्ध में वायु भी उन्हें तुरंत पराजित नहीं कर सकता।" ### 2. **कर्ण का दानशीलता:** **महाभारत, वन पर्व, अध्याय 297, श्लोक 22-25:** **संस्कृत:** ``` यस्य याच्ञां न विज्ञाय ददाति किल सुव्रत:। कवचेन्द्रियुगं देवं तत्सर्वं साक्षिपुत्रवत्॥ 22॥ स वै विवसन: कर्णो याचितस्तेन धर्मवित्। कवचं परमं दिव्यं वृत्तसारमहाव्रती॥ 23॥ स दत्त्वा तु तत: साक्षात्कवचं पार्थिवर्षभ:। ददौ सुमहत: तस्य वृत्तं च न शशाक ताम्॥ 24॥ इन्द्राय च स वीरत्वात्प्रदाय कवचं पुन:। अतुल्यं द्वादशस्यान्यं गतवांस्तस्य तेजसा॥ 25॥ ``` **हिन्दी अनुवाद:** "वह महाव्रती कर्ण, जो किसी की याचना को बिना सोचे-समझे कभी मना नहीं करता, इन्द्र द्वारा माँगे जाने पर अपने दिव्य कवच और कुंडल को भी दान में दे देता है।" "कर्ण ने अपने दिव्य कवच को इन्द्र को दान में दिया, जिससे वह स्वयं की रक्षा के लिए बनाया गया था। इस तरह कर्ण ने अपनी दानशीलता का परिचय दिया और अत्यधिक तेज प्राप्त किया।" ### 3. **कर्ण का शक्ति और पराक्रम:** **महाभारत, कर्ण पर्व, अध्याय 91, श्लोक 1-3:** **संस्कृत:** ``` कर्णोऽपि धनुरादाय तिष्ठत्त्वरितविक्रम:। दुर्योधनस्य सैन्यानि द्रावयामास पाण्डवात्॥ 1॥ स वै रथेन महता धवजेन च बृंहित:। संजघान रणे शत्रून् सायकै: कनकच्छदै:॥ 2॥ न तत्र कश्चित् प्रत्यासीद्धि सन्नद्धं सुतमर्षिण:। सर्वेषां हि बलं कर्ण: पाण्डवेषु व्ययोजयत्॥ 3॥ ``` **हिन्दी अनुवाद:** "कर्ण ने धनुष उठाकर युद्ध में त्वरित गति से खड़ा हुआ और दुर्योधन की सेना को पांडवों से बचाने लगा।" "वह विशाल रथ और ध्वज के साथ, स्वर्ण आवरण से सुसज्जित बाणों से शत्रुओं को युद्ध में मारने लगा।" "उस समय, कर्ण की शक्ति के सामने कोई भी शत्रु खड़ा नहीं हो सका, क्योंकि कर्ण ने पांडवों के विरुद्ध सभी की शक्ति को व्यर्थ कर दिया।" ### 4. **कर्ण का दिव्यास्त्र:** **महाभारत, द्रोण पर्व, अध्याय 87, श्लोक 20:** **संस्कृत:** ``` ततो दिव्यास्त्रमादाय कर्णो युद्धविनोदय:। मुमोचास्त्रं महावेगं कृतवर्मा विनिह्नुवन्॥ 20॥ ``` **हिन्दी अनुवाद:** "तब कर्ण, युद्ध में आनंद लेने वाला, दिव्य अस्त्र का प्रयोग करते हुए, महान वेग से एक महाशक्तिशाली अस्त्र छोड़ता है, जो कृतवर्मा को ढंक देता है।" इन उदाहरणों से स्पष्ट होता है कि कर्ण की शक्ति, पराक्रम, दानशीलता और अस्त्र-विद्या में निपुणता, महाभारत में विस्तृत रूप से वर्णित हैं।

[@SheelaBhardwaj-rl6cw]

​@ItsVivi2007 bhai khulla bol Raha houn chatgpt se likha houn

[@SheelaBhardwaj-rl6cw]

@ItsVivi2007 ek chizz bta bhai aap kiske side ho debate mein Aur aapne kaha se copy paste kiya ye dialect kisi manus ka toh ho ni shakta thoda aur mahnat kar slok bhi paste kr dete evidence toh hota etne bade paragraph ka lag ra man se thok ra hai parv likh ke woh chatgpt se copy paste kr ke Mere mein toh slok bhi tha chapter, parv translation meaning (pure evidence) Bolne se kuchh ni hota meine toh Mahabharata padhi duniyaa ki sabse badi poem ab vishwas kaise dilau koi toh Mahabharata padhe ga ni karta houn jisse sabse jyada fan hai karna ki beizzati kr dete hai viral bhi honge debate bhi chalegi bs khatma

[@technikdhanuk4773]

@@SheelaBhardwaj-rl6cw bhai bolne hi ja ra tha gpt se likha hai par aapne khudi bta diya Mujhe bhi gussa aata hai jab karn ko kuch log defame krte hai aur bolte hai Ye wo log hai jo Sonyputra dekh ke aae hai Maine bhi gpt se try karke nikale the Aise shloka aur translation par ek cheez hai yahi shloka aap wapas uspe copy paste karke poochoge aur likhoge is it exactly from Mahabharata by ved vyasa To wo doubt dikha dega Maine to ye bhi notice Kiya ki actually me ved vyasa ji jo the wo pandava aur Kauravas ke dada ji ab koi bhi jab kuch kahani likhega to usi pe likhega jo Jeet gya hoga

[@technikdhanuk4773]

Aur sabse badi cheez to ye hai ki pandava devtao se prapt putra the to jahir si baat hai bakiyo se ache to honge but karna bhi to Surya Dev ka Putra tha Sarvashrest dhanurdhari keh dete hai Arjun ko but back story kya hai jab seekhne hi nhi diya jaega to kaise koi Arjun se acha ho jaega Dronacharya ji ne Arjun ko wada kiya tha ki wo Arjun ko sarvshrest dhanurdhari banaenge to jab unko pta lga ekluvya Bina unki siksha ke unki pratima bna kr Arjun se aage nikal ra tha to uska anghutha maang liya acha hua karn ne aage ki sikhsa parshuram ji se le li warna wo karn se uska jeevan maang lete aur wo de deta kyuki danveer karn se unke guru kya koi bhi kuch mangta tha to wo use Khali nhi Jane dete the Arjun ke pass gandhiva tha jo ki unhe Agni dev se mila tha Arjun aur karn ka samna Kai baar hua har baar Arjun bhari pade kyuki unke pass ek Divya dhanush tha Par jab kurukshetra ki bari aai to karn Arjun pe bhari pade kyuki kurukshetra ke yudh me karn ke paas bhi Vijay dhanush tha jo ki ek Divya dhanush tha shiv ji ka parshuram ji ke dwara diya gya tha Karn Arjun par bhari pad rhe the tabhi krisna ji ko chal chalni padi wo Arjun ke rath ko daldali jagah le gye jaha karn ka rath fas gya aur wo rath ka pahiya nikal rha tha us waqt ki marne ka aadesh diya Kyuki jab tak wo Vijay dhanush karn ke hath me tha wo haar nhi sakta tha

[@nagavamsip]

@@technikdhanuk4773 Kripya granth padhiye aur serials par vishwaas mat keejiye. Karna gurudakshina yudh me Drupada se parasth hokar bhag gaye the. Tab Phalguna ne Drupada ko bandhi banaya tha. Tab Phalguna ke paas Gandiva nahi thi. Gandiva kabhi Phalguna ko koyi vishesh shakti nahi deti thi. Phalguna itne mahabahu the ki yudh me puri kshamta ke saath sara sandhaan karte samay sadharan dhanush toot jati thi. Iss liye unhe atoot Gandiva diya gaya tha. Gandiva ki tankaar sunkar shatru bhaybheet iss liye hote the kyuki uss dhanush ko chalane wala koyi aagaya tha. Gandiva ko uthakar uspar pratyancha chadana bhi kathin tha. Kya aapko gyaat hai ki 'Vijay dhanush' ke bare me kitne logo ne kaha tha? Keval ek. karna. Wo bhi unhone 17th din Suyodhana se yeh baat kaha tha. Jab swayam Sri Parashurama Kuru sabha gaye aur raja Dhritrashtra ko yudh ke virudh salah di, tab bhi unhone keval Nara Narayana avatara Phalguna, Sri Hari, aur Gandiva ke bareme hi kaha.

[@diponmesh27]

Krishna himself chosen to be the sarathi!! The historical facts can be interpretted in multiple ways so who is right or wrong is not a big deal! But the path Karna chose was wrong and he should have rectified it through his karma! But what happened with Karna is also not right hence all those people who were directly or indirectly a part of his fate also suffered and that is KARMA...KARMA is the ULTIMATE DHARMA!!

[@legalinformationbylabhsing5163]

Yudhisthra is main culprit, who treated his wife as property, whether you are a woman & you shall treat yourself as property. You are talking in negative perspective, Why you not talk about bhishma, who committed the offence of kidnapping of three women. How pandav are good, who are powerful, but can't fight for saving their wife. You are showing negative prespective just to be famous. It was Karna, who raises the issue of cast discrimination, He saved the life of pandavs, He donated his kavach & last if Karan is not powerful, why he was killed armless.

[@rukmini_shyam]

bhai mahabharat padh le, kam se kam gita toh padle bak ne se pehle. you will find every answer.

[@soulflower2021]

Padh le Mahabharata gawar

[@sganesh2958]

​@@rukmini_shyamBhai dhusro ko bolney sey pehle tum padkar unko samjana , har koi aapkey jaisey na hotana 😂😂 Har vyakti apkey jaisa Arjun Andra bhakth hotey nahi na jo log karn ko apna manthey hei vo log unka jeevan se manthey hai na aapkey jaisey sir virata hi nahi dhektey maanvatha bi dhektey

[@rukmini_shyam]

@@sganesh2958 bhai aap kya hi bol rahe hain? Yudhishtr ka vrat tha ki woh dyut ko kabhi asweekar nahi kar sakte. Agar mein Arjun ki support na bhi karti tab bhi mein Karn ki koi mahanta ko nahi manti. Usske karan hi inta kaand hua tha

[@sganesh2958]

@@rukmini_shyam kuch bi pandavao kiya vah subkuch ka ek kaaran hota jab kaurav kiya ya karn kiya uske piche kuch karan nahi hota aur aap manthey bhi nahi, kya bola aapney yudistir ka vrat tha dyut ko asweekar nahi kar saktha woh galat hai, yudisthir ko as a guest hastinapur mei aaney ko bola tha usi nimantran ko vo asweekar nahi karsakta kyunki wah nimantran unkey bado ney dhiya tha unka apmaan nahi karsakta, unko pata bhi nahi vaha dyut khel honei vala hai jab pata chala woh inkar karsakta kyunki woh Adharm khel hei, khela tho bhi casual sa bhi khel sakta dhav laganey ka kya jarurat hai. Aap karn ki coin ki ek tharaf dekar hi judgment pass kardhetey, aap sahi mei pada tho har ek ka acha hai bura bhi esa dhekato atleast aapko karan key tharaf pity feel karthey hatered nahi. Aap bias hona chahte hai

[@aquasky77]

Everyone who is complaining. Why don't you read Vyas ji's Mahabharat, the original text. I have not read it myself and I have only see B R Chopra's Mahabharat. But I am not stupid to fight and call someone names if I have not done my homework. We know text is seldom translated as is from text to screen, they make a lot of changes, they also try to keep the common narrative in public when making epics like this. For example Lakshman Rekha is not in the original Valmiki Ramayan, but its widely believed to be true so it was there in Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan. Personally I love the sequence but I not going to fight someone if they tell me its not in Valmiki Ramayan. Its fine its not in the original, its good that I know it now but I can still appreciate a bhakt's version or interpretation of this sequence. So stop calling people delusional if you have not done the reading on your part. First read, then you have bullet points to argue else it's like shooting blank rounds of a pistol.

[@akashdhar9412]

Lakshman Rekha is first mentioned in Bengali Ramayana

[@Sir_Killsalot]

No I don't think I will

[@ciaray5432]

In Mahabharat nobody was ultimate hero or villain including Karna. But here Karna is being interpreted as villain. That is the problem. Yudh in Mahabharat didn't happend because of Karn, but yes, Duryadhan believed as he has Karn with him, so he will win. Karna for sure had big mouth, but he still was bir, neither Karna could defeat Arjun, nor Arjun could defeat Karna. Being Sut was not bad, it was not gaali, if we think it is gaali, then it is our fault, not Karna's. And yes, specifically Arjun used to call him Sut/Sutputra which hurt Karna a lot. If we think Karna was being discriminated for being "neech jati", again it is our fault, not Karna's. If we think Karna was hero, it is also our fault, not Karna's. He didn't came to us and begged to call him "hay bechara" saying all these drama.

[@anoop61284]

​@@ciaray5432not true. Karna himself called his charioteer as sutputra. Sutputra was a Nobel term. The narration of mahabharata starts with suta ugrashava sauti & when he is narrating the story everyone is calling him suta.

[@soumitrachakraborty7103]

Some how I don't agree with the views expressed by her . Karna was the most complex character of Mahabharata and you can't just paint him in black and white. I don't claim to have precise knowledge of scriptures but let as look into it fact wise according to the books. 1) Like other pandavas he was also the son of a God then is it not natural that he also possesed extraordinary physical and mental capabilities like his other brothers. 2) He was taught by Lord Parsuram himself, there was gurukul system back in those days and Gurus did test capabilities of their students as we know from the texts so doesn't it imply that lord Parsuram found him capable enough to make him his student. 3) When he came to know that he was the eldest Kuntiputra he could have had the whole world at his feet . Lord Krishna had also advised him to break the news and go to pandavas in a last attempt to avoid conflict . What a sly and purely wicked fellow as portrayed in the podcast could have done in such a situation if he only had a craving for recognition and power. There are several other facts also but I leave you with these three. I am not interested in who was stronger because it's a wrong way to look at our scriptures . Infact we should learn from them. (One thing that has been rightly observed is the fact of friendship of doom. ) Exactly in what sense is quite debatable. 🙏

[@Red-Hood12]

Karna was not at all complex, it's simple - he was as cruel and wicked just like duryodhana.. That's why they were best friends. Indeed he was powerful as he was a demon named Sahasrakavacha in his previous life.

[@soumitrachakraborty7103]

@Alien-user Dear sir I don't know what brings you to that opinion because as far as I know he was also referred as daanveer and is revered for his acts of giving away which is a act of kindness, infact he gave away his single kawach knowing that the Brahman asking for it is Indra. Sahasrakawach had already lost his 999 kawach in previous birth he had only one in this birth given by his father sun God in form of kawach and kundal. 2nd point is that a purely cruel person would have killed 3 of his brothers when he had the opportunity to do so on the battlefield. Leave alone Arjuna and Bheema if you consider them to be stronger. There are other other events also that reflects his kindness but anyway its pointless to debate on that because as I said that we should learn from our scriptures. My only conclusion is whoever stands against Dharma falls may it be pious people like Bhisma and Drona also. So choose your side and friends very carefully and belive me it's a very difficult choice to make. 🙏

[@KakongJamoh-et8cd]

Ya.if your mom's abandoned you. the girl you love. Called you chota jath the mom who don't care about you.what will you do what's your reaction

[@Watchers-oo1]

This women is mad. She doesn't even know that Arjuna and draupadi were ghe greatest criminals. They were part of the woke LGBTQ community of that age. Thats is the reason Draupadi was having 5 husbands. And karna and Duryodhana were just trying to end wokism.

[@satishkamtikar958]

Karna was brave . But he just kept poteaying himself as a victim . Again and again. Despite the fact that Duryodhan kept him besides him Gave him a kingdom. Made him ruler. Always took his side against hisnown family members. Still Karna kept his,"Iam a victim" mentality alive.

[@ankeetabose2059]

karna was not brave. he had tried to save his life and escape when the gandharvas attacked them in the forest. infact he left duryodhan at their mercy! what kind of bravery is this? he was a coward

[@satishkamtikar958]

@@ankeetabose2059 This never happened. In fact BR Chopra himself said that he had introduced this of his own imagination (or creativity) to show Duryodhan as villain and Pandavas as the good guys

[@ankeetabose2059]

i am very sorry, but this wasnt introduced by b r chopra ji. he had never said anything like that. i'm not talking about the serial . i am talking about the real mahabharata, from where this story was taken. and gandharvas werent tribals like they showed in the serial. they were celestials, and their king was maharaj chitrasen, who was the arjun's best friend and had taught him dance and music. they had come to attack duryodhan because they knew why duryodhan had gone there, to mentally torture the pandavas. this si the real story, not what they showed in b r chopra ji's mahabharat. kindly read the mahabharat first. this is part of the epic. karna was a coward, its proven hence@@satishkamtikar958

[@naturaleza9816]

​@@ankeetabose2059if he was not brave he would have never gave his karnakundala to devendra since he knew it was there for his protection. Despite being in a Warfield with a huge pressure of jay parajay he gave his karnakundala.

[@siddharthagoel366]

Okay, but please explain the good side too where he donated without prejudice to his own doom. Where he promises to Kunti that she will always have her 5 sons. Where Krishna appreciates his calibre despite Hanuman ji and Sheshnag and Vishnu ji himself helping Arjun. How can a Parrshuram shishya be not worthy and valorous. I dont believe that Karna was less valorous or capable than any. He is also a real friend, knowing that Duryodhana is wrong, stuck with him for his kindness when no one else was kind. Even Bhishma Pitamah stuck to Duryodhana because of his vachan. This point has been made by Ami ji at a lot of places but she never explains it. Also, as per Ami ji, soot means son/daughter of brahmin and kshatriya. So, tell me how was saying that I am a brahmin putra was a lie told to Parshuram ji ??

[@luciferaoi8188]

Bro phir idiot waali baat kr rahe ho..vedvayas ki mahabharat padho..usme aisa kahi nhi likha ki karan k maarne se arjun ka rath 4 kadam piche jaata aur arjun se 20 kadam...amiji ki ek aur video h usme unhonne bataya tha...aur ek baat aur draupadi swamywar me karn ko sutt bol kr nhi hataya gya balki wo dhanush utha toh liya pr string/prantancha nhi lga paya islye disqualify ho gya...tum murkh ho

[@siddharthagoel366]

@luciferaoi8188 bro jo tumne jawab diya hai usme se kuch bhi maine likha hi nahi. Tum apni kahani ga rahey ho. Pehle dekho kya likha hai. Padhna ni ata isilie ye dasha hai tumari. Jo likha hai uski baat karo. Apna baaja mat bajao. Ye btao if brahmin and kshatriya ka bacha hi soot hai to Parshuram ji ne ye kyu kaha ki Karna ne jhut bolkar vidya lee hai. Thoda padhna likhna seekhlo, ussey samjh aegi aur dusro ki opinion smjhne ka dimag aega. Baki online likhna asan hai, to tum bakwas likhlo footage khane k lie.

[@wolvecod4049]

Karna surya dev ko kavach kundal daan mei deta hei pr uske badle karna arjun ko marne ka astra leta hei ise daan dena nahi khete . Bc

[@NikhilBijarniya-r2e]

to both the idiots, mahabharat is 5000 years ago and the mahabharat we study today is written few hundreds years ago. so it is 100% possible that it can be wrong what we study today. Mahabharat is composed of 100000 Shloks. Moreover, karna is a son of god and a student of god, he can't be wrong

[@siddharthagoel366]

@user-iz7cj3iz4r To the new fool, I hope you read what I said in my comment. Also, Mahabharat by Ved Vyas was written by him at the same time as it happened. Not after thousands of years. I hope you know Ved Byas is present at the time of Mahabharat.

[@divyanshgupta4894]

What is surprising is that all she said is from the original texts or we can say the "canon" version, but still many people will refuse to understand, I don't know why 🤦

[@rajadahir2066]

This is why i must say films are tool to make public opinion. Actually if you go through Mahabharat you see karna always shows victim card. Even today.

[@ayushagarwal3307]

Lady go recheck your facts. Just talking bs on mic won't help. Here's some facts: 1. Consider a scenario where your family is traveling in a car, and your father is driving it. Compare this to a situation where you have hired a driver. Is the role of the driver and your father the same? Does this imply that your father and the hired driver deserve the same respect? Similarly, Karna's father was a charioteer, while Krishna was part of the royal family. 2. Dronacharya refused to teach Karna, stating that he had sworn to teach only the royal families of the Pandavas and Kauravas. Consequently, Karna had to seek instruction elsewhere. Given that Drona took Eklavya's thumb to ensure Arjuna remained the best, it was fortunate for Karna that he found a different teacher. 3. Karna was the epitome of dharma. He promised Kunti that she would have five sons alive at the end of the war. He defeated all the Pandavas except Arjuna and spared their lives, keeping his word. 4. A Arjun fan like you, who killed Karna behind the backs 13:33 13:33 wouldn't understand what is dharm, being man of your words etc which was more important to real Kshatriyas. That's why karna gives away his kawach, spares 4 pandavs, etc. Lastly, it is important to note that history was written under the supervision of the Pandavas.

[@deepak__k]

1) कर्ण अर्जुनसे कम से कम 10 साल बडा था | कुंती ने कर्ण को जन्म देने के बाद 2-3 साल बाद शादी की | 3-4 साल राजा पांडू के साथ अरण्यविहार हुआ | उसके बाद पांडू को शाप मिला | उसके बाद 2-3 साल बाद पुत्रकामना में कुंती ने यमधर्म का आवाहन किया | पहला पुत्र धर्मराज, दुसरा पुत्र भीम और तिसरा पुत्र अर्जुन | अब बताओ की एक 10 वी का बच्चा अगर प्रथम कक्षा की बच्चे से द्वेष करता हैं तो क्या उसका दिमाग ठीक होगा? 2) अगर तब ड्रायव्हर को कम समझा जाता तो क्या राजा शल्य कर्ण के सारथी बनते? क्या विराट पुत्र अर्जुन का सारथी बनता? क्या श्रीकृष्ण अर्जुन के सारथी बनते? 3) कर्ण बचपनसेही हमेशा दुर्योधन के साथ रहता था | इसका प्रमाण महाभारत में आदिपर्व में मिलता हैं | जब भीम को कालकुट नाम का विष पिलाकर दुर्योधन, कर्ण, शकुनी आदी लोगोने गंगा में बहा दिया था | 4) ऐसी ही चाटुकारीता से उसे अंगदेश का राज्य मिला | जिसके प्रधान उसके पिताजी थे |

[@Saswata671]

​@deepak__k No. Bori has removed Karna's name from this incident. Now people use this statement and say that Karna tried to kill pandavas. Then Duryodhana, Karna and Subala’s son Shakuni tried many other means to kill the Pandavas. First, there were just kauravas and Pandavas and then suddenly Karna appears in just one sentence. Strange!! It's written that Karna tried to kill pandavas by many other means! Do we have any cross reference about it? Bheem poisoning and lakshagrih has cross references but this many other means have no cross reference. Strange!! An outsider (Karna) is trying to kill pandavas (many times) and still the elders of hastinapur like bheeshma, Vidura etc.. are silent!! Strange!! If Karna would have tried to kill pandavas then bheeshma would have never let him learn with Pandavas from drona. Forget about learning, he would have never let Karna enter in hastinapur again. So this statement is clearly an interpolation. I don't care if it's in kmg or bori or any other version but this is logically impossible. And also there was no direct mention of karna in both the cases

[@suprith5443]

Although I'm not a fan of karna your last words intrigued me. "History is written by Victors".

[@vishwaajithpemmasani1198]

@ayushagarwal3307 1. First of all please don’t compare driving a warrior’s chariot in a battle to that of driving a car on a road in our modern world. A sarthi is supposed to have knowledge of warfare, ranneeti and excellent chariot steering skills. It’s the sarthi’s duty to ensure that the warrior fighting from the chariot is shielded from enemy attacks while at the same time has an advantageous position to attack enemies. Also, apart from just being Bhishma’s charioteer, Adhirath was a chieftain of the Anga rajya which was a suta community ka rajya that owed allegiance to Hastinapur. So please don’t compare a rath sarthi to a car driver 🙏 2. Karna learnt initial education from Dronacharya this is mentioned in Adi parva 131.10 to 131.12 please check for yourself. He was never denied education because he was a Sutaputra. When he asked Drona for brahmastra and Drona refused he went to Parashuram. 3. Please don’t say Karna was epitome of dharma. An epitome of dharma would never lose control of his tongue and call the daughter in law if a royal kingdom a whore and would not suggest disrobing. Yes he defeated other Pandavas but we should not forget that he was also defeated by Bheema and Satyaki during the same war. It’s always said that history is a victor’s tale. But I have a logic for this. So I hope uk that as Vichitravirya died heirless, Vyas was called for niyoga and Dhritarashtra and Pandu were born. Practically speaking, he was the biological father of Dhritarashtra and Pandu. The Kauravas were Dhritarashtra’s own blood while on the other hand, the Pandavas were not Pandu’s own blood. So ideally the Kauravas were Vyas ke apne khoon. But he still says Kauravas were adharmi and Pandavas dharmi isliye pandavon ki jeet hui. So it’s basically Vyas Maharshi ke vanshajon ki kahani

[@Saswata671]

@vishwaajithpemmasani1198 In the text it was written that there were two reasons for the refusal of dronachariya. Here it is: one day approached Drona in private and said these words unto him, 'I desire to be acquainted with the Brahma weapon, with all its mantras and the power of withdrawing it, for I desire to fight Arjuna. Without doubt, the affection thou bearest to every one of thy pupils is equal to what thou bearest to thy own son. I pray that all the masters of the science of weapons may, through thy grace, regard me as one accomplished in weapons!' Thus addressed by him, Drona, from partiality for Phalguna, as also from his knowledge of the wickedness of Karna, said, 'None but a Brahmana, who has duly observed all vows, should be acquainted with the Brahma weapon, or a Kshatriya that has practised austere penances, and no other.' Obviously Drona refused to offer him Brahmastra.. In Narada’s view the reasons for Drona’s refusal His partiality for Arjuna Karna's mindset And yeah, I agree with your other points.

[@adityachauhan8964]

The truth is that Mahabharata after written by ved vyasa has been modified by authors according to their perception in some way or other. Only the person who is trikaldarshi can let us know what exactly the truth was. We are ordinary human beings so we are not entitled to comment on the person like karna who had the knowledge of brahmastra and various divine weapons. This is like a common man making comments on a prime minister or international sportsman and has achieved nothing remarkable in his lifetime. A common man body does not have the capability to resist a single bullet then why are we unnecessarily making comments about divine weapons holder like karna and arjuna. Kalki objective is to remove all the myths and false belief that has engulfed the wisdom of common man

[@baklolzz]

Everybody has their own narration and perspectives . Nothing is black nothing is white. Everything is grey.

[@omeglefunny3023]

Yes both Pandava and Kauravas were equally adhramiks

[@soulflower2021]

Abe padh le Karan ka gooh khane wale uske fan

[@pankajk.r2448]

A gaye centrist

[@shaileshrai229]

Karna was good personality. In whole mahabhart he has done only one mistake in draupadi vatastrharan by not protecting a Lady in a royal court where only there were men. Same crime done by everyone who didn't not oppose including pandavas . Due to this crime every one's life became hell. Either they killed or live whole life in grief. While karna three setbacks first he live life in sorrow second killed third get nothing. Reason that he wanted to marry Draupadi but failed. So his responsibity increased to protect her. In whole mahabaht every one guided by their elders .only karna was not guided by any one. But overall he was noble warrior with good heart. We salute him

[@diclowderb8918]

Lo aa gaye Serial waale chacha .😂

[@ritumroy5725]

You forgot barnabat fire incident, plotted by karna and sakuni. You forgot Abhimanyu's killing ; 1st unethical murder in kurukshetra war. In both Karna was a main participator. Karna was that evil egoistic person who can go beyond limit to satisfy his ego and glowrify his name by hook or crook. His hate towards pandavas and Draupadi was the result of his boundless egoistic nature.

[@Sumit-wj3wm]

1:10 biasness starts. ma ne tyag diya ( and didi says Wo toh theek hai usko to pata bhi ni tha ) 😂 Aag laga de aise bias book mai

[@Iam_Nani]

Surya dev said kunti that he will be fine

[@Sumit-wj3wm]

@@Iam_Nani aisa toh kahin padha nahi maine. But bola bhi ho to it doesn’t explain her stupid bias.

[@Mycollection-songs]

Pandvo ko acha kehne waalo bas ek jawab do- yudhishthir kaisa dharmraj jo apne bhai aur biwi ko juwe mai khele😂😂 Arjun ko mahaan bolne waalo-sri krishna swayam keh gaye agar wey aur bajrangbaliji n hote toh arjun kab ka haar gaya hota. Dronacharya ko acha bolne waale- ye batao usne eklavya ka angootha aur karn ko siksha dene se kyu mana kiya. Dhongiyo k paskh lene waale dhongi hote hai. Karn arjun se mahan tha jaise veer savarkar gandhi se, sachai nahi badalti, koi kuch bhi bole

[@arupjyotisarma976]

Yudhishthira ka mati bhram ho gaya tha lekin Kaurav aur Karna ka toh dimag sahi jagah pe tha toh kyun Karn ne Draupadi ko Vaishya kaha aur usko sabke beech nagn karne ka baat kahan, kyun Karna ne Duryodhan ke saath milkar Bheem ko zeher dia itna mahan agar Karn tha hi, dosti itni acchi thhi toh Gandharvo ke saath jab ladayi Hui thhi toh Duryodhan ko kyun chhod ke bhaga tha Karn ? Aisi dosti ?

[@rohitchaudhary3709]

Vo juwa wala scene sabak lene k liye hi h aj k kalyugi manushya k liye ki chahe koi yudhishthira jesa mhan dharmraj hi kyu na ho jua khelne jese adharmik kary krne se buddhi bhrast ho jati h fir manushya ko acche bure ka gyan nhi rhta h or ye kha likha h ki krishnji ne bola ki agr vo or hanuman ji na hote to arjun har jata yudh samapt hone pr arjun ne ye pucha tha ki uska rath abhi tk bilkul shi kese h tb krishn ji ne btaya tha ki ispe swayam hanuman ji virajman the isliye iska koi kch bigad nhi paya tha or tmhre hisab se to fir virat k yudh m bhi krishn ji or hanuman ji honge arjun k sth jb usne akele hi pure kaurwo or guruo ko hra diya tha 😂

[@ranasandeep86]

Gandhi ji ko savarkar se compare karke tumhari mansikta pta chl gyi . Isliye karn ka favour le rhe ho . Achhhai aur dharm ka sath tum logon ne kabhi nhi dena .

[@bishnoi10]

Before reading Mahabharata i was same like "KARNA KE SAATH ANYAAY HUA H😂" now i kn he was the bone of contention 😅

[@HAPPYRAHUL-xl8ht]

She is telling karna just learn brahmastra from parshuram.. i think she needs to recheck her knowledge Plz read these two recheck ur knowledge Adi parva:- discusses karnas lineage and his rejection by dronacharya Udyoga parva: details karna's training under parshuram

[@yparadkar]

Haa karna hi buraa thaa.... baki sab sidhee....kunti achi thi jisnee karna koo ganaga mee bahaa diyaa, Dronacharya achee thee Eklavya kaa anguthaa kaataa, Bhisham achataa joo kashi ki 3 ladki bhagaa layaa, Yudhishthir achaa thaa joo juvee mee sab haar gayaa bibi koo bhi, Sab achee thee karna hi khraab thaa....

[@AashishKumar-su7og]

Bhaiya har karya ka Karan hota hai, angraj ne akele sangharsh nhi kiya pandavo ne bhi kiya,

[@yug4883]

Toh Karn kaise aacha tha jo ek women ko N@ked dekhna chahta tha 🤢

[@abhisheknahar7363]

@@yug4883 Abey oh woh draupadi ke upper garments disrobe karne ko kaha tha kyuki draupadi ab dasi ban chuki thi. Dasiya upper garments nahi pehenti thi tab ke time me.

[@yparadkar]

@@AashishKumar-su7og Padva koo sab facility mili education mili, Karna koo education kee liyee zhut bolnaa padaa yee uski mazburi thi , Voo sirf Dharnurdhr hi nahi thaa malla udhay bhi kar saktaa thaa, krisna nahi hotee too Arjun bhi karnaa koo haraa nahi paataa

[@yug4883]

@@abhisheknahar7363 pata hai Mulle 😂 He said if she comes n@ked then also he have no problem

[@kundankanan9074]

I think lots of point that she mentions are correct but that doesn't hide the fact that Sutas were looked down upon. Nothing highlights it more than Shayla's initial response to Duryodhan when he was asked to be Karna's charioteer. "Knowing me, O monarch, to be so capable, of afflicting the foe, why dost thou appoint me to the office of driver in battle for such a low-born person as Adhiratha's son? It behoveth thee not, O king of kings, to set me to such mean tasks! Being so superior, I cannot make up my mind to obey the commands of a sinful person. He that causeth a superior person arrived of his own will and obedient from love, to yield to a sinful wight, certainly incurreth the sin of confusing the superior with the inferior. Brahman created the brahmanas from his mouth, and the kshatriyas from his arms. He created the Vaishyas from his thighs and the Shudras from his feet. In consequence of the intermixture of those four orders, O Bharata, from those four have sprung particular classes, viz., those born of men of superior classes wedding women of classes inferior to themselves, and vice versa. The kshatriyas have been described to be protectors (of the other classes) acquirers of wealth and givers of the same. The brahmanas have been established on the Earth for the sake of favouring its people by assisting at sacrifices, by teaching and acceptance of pure gifts. Agriculture and tending of cattle and gift are the occupations of the Vaishyas according to the scriptures. Shudras have been ordained to be the servants of the brahmanas, the kshatriyas, and the vaishyas. Similarly, the Sutas are the servants of kshatriyas, and not latter the servants of the former. Listen to these my words, O sinless one. As regards myself, I am one whose coronal locks have undergone the sacred bath. I am born in a race of royal sages. I am reckoned a great car-warrior. I deserve the worship and the praises that bards and eulogists render and sing. Being all this, O slayer of hostile troops, I cannot go to the extent of acting as the driver of the Suta's son in battle. I will never fight, undergoing an act of humiliation. I ask thy permission, O son of Gandhari, for returning home."-- see how he feels offended. Please do not white-wash history and accept the things they are. Though to be honest, Karna may still have advantages over others,

[@MohitPJoshi]

1. Shalya was looking for an excuse to get away from Duryodhan's side since he was forced to fight for Kaurav when he wished to join the Pandavas. 2. Shalya is a king, Karna is a charioteer. You're asking a king to be a charioteer for a charioteer. Ofcourse he would have felt disrespected.

[@kundankanan9074]

@@MohitPJoshi that is not enough reason. Even Drupad was initially annoyed when he wasn't aware about the person who won syamvvar and worried if he was low born shudra.

[@MohitPJoshi]

@@kundankanan9074 weren't the Pandavas cosplaying as Brahmanas in the swayamwar???

[@kundankanan9074]

@@MohitPJoshi yes, but Drupad wasn't sure if they were really brahmins . When Dristrumnya returned after secretly following Pandavs to porter's house where they were staying , he was excited to tell the truth to his father. This is how Drupad enquired ""When morning came, the prince Dhristadyumna set out from his place of concealment with great haste in order to report to Drupada in detail all that had happened at the potter's abode and all that he had heard those heroes speak amongst themselves during the night. The king of Panchala had been sad because he knew not the Pandavas as those who had taken away his daughter. And the illustrious monarch asked Dhristadyumna on his return, 'Oh, where hath Krishna gone? Who hath taken her away? Hath any Sudra or anybody of mean descent, or hath a tribute-paying Vaisya by taking my daughter away, placed his dirty foot on my head? O son, hath that wreath of flowers been thrown away on a grave-yard? Hath any Kshatriya of high birth, or any one of the superior order (Brahmana) obtained my daughter? Hath any one of mean descent, by having won Krishna, placed his left foot on my head?"

[@Hellspawn_kun]

5:41 such a dumb argument I must say. By this logic if there's a man who keeps his status clearly above the driver class with his ego and for a certain time, interval or a ride for his son or daughter he rides the car, that means he doesn’t think of driver class below him?? Lmao

[@Shinaya2013]

Sister I agree with ur every point, but who can tell me k vaasu dev da zayada attachment Arjun to zayada karan naal c??

[@swapnilmishra3537]

Ofcourse Arjun ye bi koi puchne vali bt h Mahabharat chodho bhagwat Geeta me hi Krishna ji ne kaha h ki jo Arjun ka shatru h vo mera bi shatru h kyuki ma or Arjun ek hi hain kbi alg ni ho skte

[@PM_World14]

pls correct mam ne galti se 10:44 pe Arjun bol diya Karna ki jagah bhai tum bhi hmm hmm kr rhe ho shi se sun lete

[@arupjyotisarma976]

Aur edit bhi nahi kia

[@bhargavkalita1421]

During Virat Yudh no one was sure they were facing Arjun as Vrihanala. But Arjun was aware of whom he was facing. Hence, he used appropriate weapons against each of those warriors. Hence Arjun had an upper hand. And while fighting Gandharva's Kaurava's were drunk heavily. Not in a state to fight with their might. Hence got defeated easily.

[@professorace9502]

So basically this random lady ( idk who she is ), is literally misinterpreting those texts and that's outrageous, she is moulding those slokas' according to her will !

[@sanjananair7884]

Oh how so? She's not some random person, you not knowing her is you problem. She speaks in proper Sanskrit, and anyone who has read the original Mahabharat knows the truth

[@adarshkulkarni182]

Have you read it? I did !! This is exactly same written right there!!

[@aforartist6312]

​@@ankitparshewar8482bhaunk Matt

[@nagavamsip]

@@ankitparshewar8482 So you say that because the original manuscript is no longer available, literally anything could've happened in Mahabharata? Are you saying it could be true that Krishna was the evil one? Could it be true that Kamsa and Shakuni were the good guys? Where do you draw the line? Just because the serials you watch don't match what the granth says doesn't mean you call everyone who read these books as fools. Yes, the original manuscript may have been destroyed, but our Sanatani culture has always been a strong oral culture. Pandits in those times used to learn all vedas, upanishads and puranas byheart. The scripts that we have right now may be a condensed version that summarizes the original one. But this doesn't mean that your beloved Karna was suddenly a good guy and Arjuna was the bad guy.

[@nagavamsip]

@@ankitparshewar8482 Please do not get angry, I was simply trying to point the flaw in your argument. I did read your post when I replied. These are your specific words: " no one can claim that this the real story because in there times there not video recordings or anything to prove" Which is why I am asking you again. How much of it are you willing to change to satisfy your ego about Karna? Are you going to call Draupadi a vesya? Are you going to call Phalguna a 'napunsak'? Are you going to say Krishna, who literally called Karna a wicked man, wrong? My point is: if you are going to pick and choose what to believe in because 'the original manuscript is gone', then where do you draw the line?

[@SundaramBhatt-v1p]

एक वाक्य है। मेरे पास जो मे अक्सर सुनता हूं और अपने मित्रो को बताता हू की । "नंदलाल तेरी ढाल साथ अंजनिये थे नियति कठोर थी जो दोनो वंदनीय थे। " आशा करता हूं कि इससे आपको असली महाभारत का ज्ञान हो गा।।।। जय श्री कृष्ण 🚩

[@dharmendra722]

my understanding of all characters in Mahabharat is that they are all grey no one is completely white or completely black, some have more white some have more black

[@Immortal_lion99]

i think we should stop taking sides.........every individual in mahabharata had its flaws....and that is the whole point of mahabharata..........we need to learn from the ethical dilemmas of every character and improve our life...instead of debating who was good, evil, loyal or strong. As far as over-glorification is considered, tv shows and movies will NEVER be able to do justice to epics like Mahabharata and Ramayana. Its impossible to show everything, and some facts would be missed, which can give skewed perspective. Best is to read from original text whenever you get time. The guest in this podcast has done exactly this. More people should do this.

[@ryzengaming_yt5845]

Me yeah nhi janta ki karan bura tha yaha axha... Me bus itna janta hu ki karn ek daanveer tha.. is liye mujhe karn ka charcter axha laga..❤️

[@adarshkulkarni182]

Kounsa danveer bhai? Tuje pata bhi hai ek parv ata hai mahabharat mai tb karn bolta hai ki pandav mere se kai jyada daan dharm karte hai aur muje bhi karna chahiye arjun ko harane ke liye !! Tab se bhaisahab ne daan karna shuru kiya!! Aur baadme hugg bhi diya jab indra dev aye 😂

[@leo_leo_leo_leo_leo366]

@@adarshkulkarni182 ch***yanand jab indra ne khud brahman ka bhesh tyag aur guilty feel karne lage to swayam bole ki meri galti ke liye tumhe kuch dena chahta hu.. aur age ka to tumne padha hi hai... Mahabaharart me kahi bhi dharm nahi.. dono side se adharm hi hua hai.. 🤣

[@leo_leo_leo_leo_leo366]

@@adarshkulkarni182 murkh admi mere kai jyada karte hai... mere se ... matlab vo pehle se hi karta tha... basics me gadbadi tumhare bhai🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@adarshkulkarni182]

@@leo_leo_leo_leo_leo366 kaha padha? Batana to jra!! Ya dekha serial mai?

[@omeglefunny3023]

​@@adarshkulkarni182I've never read it in Mahabharata pls tell me chapter and verse no.?

[@user-zy1vz7qk1e]

She is telling according to her knowledge. We have to respect all the characters. Karna ke bare me juth bol ke kisi ko kya milega. Aap negative fela rahe ho

[@rukmini_shyam]

Karn is not the sacrificing, noble person as made out in the comments. Pandavas suffered more than Karn but they never did adharam like him. They lost their mother Madri and father, were not welcomed at home by cousins, were poisoned, were almost burnt alive, were forced to live in forests all their life, lost all the wealth they earned through hard work, had their wife disrespected but never did they whine about life being unfair like Karn who had the love of parents, a wife and a son and lived a comfortable life.

[@bikashkar4211]

Five brothers bedding same wife is all you need to know about the pandavs.. 😅😂

[@rukmini_shyam]

@@bikashkar4211 karn calling draupadi a vaishya and asking for her clothes to be taken off is all you need to know about karn

[@bikashkar4211]

@@rukmini_shyam what would you call a woman who shares her bed with 5 men that too 5 brothers??

[@rukmini_shyam]

​@@bikashkar4211 narak mein jaloge. she's the goddess Indrani and pandavas are Indras of past Kalpas. They belong together. Karn has no right to speak on them. She jumped into fire every year to prove her purity, what they did was tapasya not a marriage.

[@bikashkar4211]

@@rukmini_shyam 🤣😂 Jaa Jake apne kalpanik bhagwano ko complain kr de 😂🤣

[@pradeepbhojwani8139]

He wasn’t evil. But he became bitter and invested in bitterness because of caste discrimination, because of his low birth status, and that’s why he went on becoming Meaner n meaner and instead of becoming a better version of himself he became bitter and made wrong alliances and that trapped him and led to his downfall in the Kurukshetra war

[@anishqbhandari2211]

🤡🤡 tv serial

[@manikchand4948]

Did you describe the discrimination after mahabharat or before mahabharat?

[@casioprogram]

Now a days there are many well read sanskrit and english orators....Each one tells their perspective - ultimately its left to us whether to accept it or not....

[@agentravi00007]

isme perspective nahi as it is same explanation according veda vyas ab tumhe galat admi se inspiration victim khelna hai khelo

[@kshitij472]

​@@agentravi00007well said ❤

[@kshitij472]

Jisne sabse pehle Mahabharata likha usko sahi manoge ya uspe based baki logo n likhi usko sahi manoge.... In my opinion ved vya Mahabharat is more credible than later narration 😊😊😊

[@leo_leo_leo_leo_leo366]

@@agentravi00007 abey chu**yanand sabhi log galat the mahabharat me.. ye nahi keh sakte ye sahi hai aur wo galat

[@apurvavinod5613]

Ved Vyas ki Original padho.

[@aurpitachatterjee8775]

We are listening to her version only, before making any opinion ,everyone should read Mahabharat by oneself. Khud parke dekhna chahiae.naki duaro ki bast sunna chahiae. She did not mention about Raja Dhupad and Dronacharya s' equation.... Even Sakunis charecter Mahabharat is very complicated . All characters have flaws.

[@Parallelx_world]

In A World Where Mahabharat Is Written In Point Of View Of Pandavas,If Still We are finding any kaurav good,he must be a great soul..

[@PratikJoshi-kh9ij]

Well there is no point in blaming Karna he was just unlucky, obviously he made some mistakes, but the good thing is he made some efforts to be a good human being. But extreme cases broke his patience. We should better try to understand why he did those things.

[@mysongskkg3381]

Unlucky??He was raised by a rich Charioteer who was friend of Dritirashtra as well. He was very eveil. He was not strong as Arjun, even Satyaki, shishya of Arjun defeated Karna 7 times, Abhimanyu too defeated Karna. He eloped while fighting with Gandharvas, Arjun was the one who defeated Gandharvas and savas Kauravas.Go read actual texts. Being Sutputra was very common during those days. Sut was not considered a bad thing. It is nowdays portrayed as if he was discriminated and all nonsense stuff

[@Bhardwajshivbhakt]

​@@mysongskkg3381 who were gandharva ? Karna defeated gandharva but lost by chitrasen maya who was sent by indra and are Arjuna fruend

[@mysongskkg3381]

@@Bhardwajshivbhakt Gandharvas led by Chitrasen defeated Duryodan and Karna. Karna ran away with remaining army from the batte field. Duryodan, brothers and their wives were captured. Then Arjun himself alone defeated all Gandharvas including Chitrasen. Arjun killed 10 lakh soldiers using a single shot of Agneyastra which no one have ever achieved.

[@Bhardwajshivbhakt]

​@@mysongskkg3381 KARN KO MAARNE KO HI BHEJA THA INDRA NE AGAR DHANG SE PADHEGA TO PATA CHALEEGA NA KARN SIRF MAYA SE HARA THA AUR VO CHALA GYA . KARN UNPREPARED GYA THA . KARN AKELA TIKATHA PEHLE. AB REHNE DE BHAI . ARJUN PREPARE HOKAR APNE PAAPAA DWARA BHEJE GYE SE LADNE GYA THA TO AAP JYADA GYAN NA DE

[@mysongskkg3381]

@@Bhardwajshivbhakt LOL I have read. Karn defeated all Gandharvas Army at first. Then 2nd time Gandharvas again came, Chitrasen easily defeated Karna. Then other soldiers attacked Karna. Karna than fell on ground, he ran into Vikarna's Chariot and they elpoed from battlefield. Duryodhan, brothers and Shakuni was captured. Then Arjun came and defeated all Army easily including Chitrasen.

[@charlesdarwin5185]

Good or evil is dependent on the observer and obeys the laws of Relativity. 1. Genotype 2. Phenotype 3. Psychotype 4. Avatar. Projection of avatar is Maya.

[@tubeplayers1]

She is absolutely right 100 percent

[@vinodnaik7002]

But why Krishna cried and respect karn if he was evil 😐

[@jyothiradithya2000]

He didn't

[@vinodnaik7002]

@@jyothiradithya2000 read Mahabharata dude

[@jyothiradithya2000]

@@vinodnaik7002Read. That's why saying.

[@DivyanshYadav-ti9eb]

Who told u Kaaye serial mein dekhaa

[@arunjena2936]

@@jyothiradithya2000 Padha hai to bta de karna death ke baad swarg gya tha ya Nark ??

[@shyamjitripathi8758]

इन देवी ने को भी कहा है वह वास्तव में उचित ही कहा है 🙏 अच्छा लगा यह जान कर ली अभी भी लोग सच्चाई से अवगत है

[@KulamaniBehera-y7h]

Five thousanda back the women were not using saree it was fake story. To defame karna andduryodhan duryodha the plot had been added. Is it proper to gamble woman on a bate. Is it proper to have a wo man among five hubands. If duryodhan had kept draupadi as amaid what would have happened. Karna was noble one. He was a kind hearted man. You have to read jangyaseni by pratibha Roy.

[@satishkamtikar958]

He convinced himself that he is a victim. People used to call him Sut putta. But that was right. He was a charioteers son. Just because Duryodhan gave him a seat next to him, gave him so much respect more than his brothers , Karna let it go to his head. He was a narcissist. He just wanted to be the best. His personal ambitions were more than the requirements of the kingdom

[@omeglefunny3023]

Even Arjun and yudhisthira had ambitions and they also gone to bad extent for it

[@ath5978]

Well, wasn't he a victim of society's dirt-ridden mind? Wasn't he robbed of all opportunities because of his caste? Well, then he was a victim. But yes, of course, one can't consider him a hero per se. He's done his share of sins due to spite and revenge...and because of his worst decision of partnering with Duryodhana. But I don't believe he was a narcissist. He did things for the sake of DUryodhana..a narcissist may not be able to do that...a narcissist rarely feel indebted to another person...for a narcissist the world revolves around him. For me Karna was neither a villain nor a hero, he was human. A complex character...from whatever I know.

[@nagavamsip]

@@ath5978 No, Karna was never 'robbed' of any opportunity in his life. The only time he was stopped was when he tried to enter a presentation area meant for Hastinapura princes. Not being a prince or king isn't discrimination. Whether he was a full on narcissist or not, , he definitely showed narcissistic tendencies in life. He always boasted that he would kill Phalguna, displaying his jealousy. During Kurukshetra war, he announced several times he would kill both Krishnas (Phalguna and Sri Hari).

[@atulbradwaj]

बहुत बढ़िया गनात्रा जी। महाभारत में दोनों बुड्ढे भीष्म पितामह और द्रोणाचार्य एवं कर्ण की दोगलापंती के कारण ही दुर्योधन को हार का सामना करना पड़ा। अंत में दुर्योधन थक हार कर सरोवर में छुप गया।

[@killmonger86896]

@@ath5978 No he was as bad as Duryodhana, his character is whitewashed in TV series. He wasn't a Shudra. His foster father was a Kshatriya and third son of King of Kashi, his mother was a Brahmin. They were rich landlords not someone living in a hut. That's a fake narrative of TV serials. He desired Draupadi too so incited Duryodhana to assault her. He was like a one sided lover taking revenge. Yes he was daani etc n had good qualities too but then no one is 💯 black or white in Mahabharat. All have shades of grey, but he was certainly not the victim like he is portrayed.

[@JoyKashyap-p5x]

Jab aap samne hi baithe ho toh headphones kyu laga rakhe hai😂

[@KulamaniBehera-y7h]

Sun is a gana debata. He is equal to bishnu with his identity. If the sun and kunti is good how there son is bad. Inadra is a henpecked do arjun was also a henpecked. He killed bhurishraba from the behind.

[@ayushsingh4309]

Ye didi ko mahabharat samjh nhi aayi . Sut Putra ka ek counter hai mere pass karna ko pata hi nhi tha jb parsuram ne bola tha sut putra aur shrap diye phir apna dhanush diya . To kaise kshatriya aur brahmn ka pata chala didi ko . Karna ke soft corner hai kyunki wo suryaputra hai unko hamesha chhal se haraya gya . Duryodhan ko ladne ke karna motivate krta the waah 😂😂 Karna maidaan chhor ke bhag gaya 😂😂😂 Band kro inlogon ko

[@TheeeAP]

Sale TV serial ke Mahabharat dekh ke khud ko gyaani samajh raha hai usne padhi hai Mahabharata ved vyas ki ... chup rah tu

[@apurvavinod5613]

Your Karma determines your Varna - Focus on Education - Brahmin, Focus on Strength and Fighting - Kshatriya. Focus on Business - Vaishya. Focus on Services and Small business - Shudra. Nothing is permanent.

[@mahadevbhosale9563]

तुम्ही वाचलेले महाभारत कशावरुन खरं आहे ती original copy आहे का?

[@playerx7429]

Evil log Daani nahi hota bahen...

[@God-cv1wb]

Aise to ravan bhi shiv bhakt tha , to kya wo acha tha ? Anpadh

[@ganeshahire5576]

bhai kya bol raha he , sun bolte he na bade bade 2 number ke kam karne vale log kafi dan dharam karte he kyoki unka pap chupaya ja sake or unhe lage ham punya kama rahe he or ham punishment se bach jayenge, to please apne jo grantha he oh padho tumko har ek sawal ka jawab milega

[@the___root__user143]

FIR BHI KARNA MUJHE PRIY HAI

[@DivyanshYadav-ti9eb]

Haan kalyug hai 😂Ram ji or krishna ji predicted that

[@the___root__user143]

@@DivyanshYadav-ti9eb किसी महापुरुष ने कहा हैं दान से बड़ा कोई दान नहीं और कर्ण हमेशा से ही दान देता आया है।

[@nagavamsip]

@@the___root__user143 uss yuga me kayi log daan dete the. Jarasandha bhi bade daani the, jiske karan Sri Hari ne unse Vrikodara ke saath ‘malla yuddha’ ka daan manga tha. Aur Kavacha Kundala dena daan nahi tha, vyapaar tha.

[@apurvavinod5613]

Britishers ki Divide and Rule policy se bahar aao.

[@anishqbhandari2211]

Achi baat ek aurat ko ko vesya bolne wala aur bole ki isse nanga bhi kr doge tho koi frkh nhi padega esa insan jarur priy hoga bagwan kre koi apko maa bhen ko esa na bole bs aur khi tb aap bole muje wo priy hai

[@yubrajghimire8709]

just a question if karna was a coward then why was he killed when he was unweaponed and why indra asked him his kawaj kundal.

[@rahulrmc1613]

Arjun ne kaha na ki brahman darpok toh isme karan ka kasoor .... Aap kya jaanengi , kavach kundal dena kitna bada hota .... Kavach kundal ke saamne , ek baar brahmastra use kitna difference hai .... Aur dhaan dena mahaanta ka kaam hi hai , jisse parakne ke liye dil chahiye madam Abe pagli , jab pitamaha ne keh diya ki woh rati nahi , toh wo kyu war karne aayega ... Arjun ko toh krishna ne bacha liya tha , jab krishna ne apna rath ko jukha diya ... Agar parashuram ka shraab nahi hota toh different hota situation .... Karn ne gadodgaj ko haraya tha ... Karn haar iske vajah se jaata kyuki uske paas vijay dhanush nahi tha wo samay

[@Arajokota]

Paashupatastra kya hai pata hai? Woh ek aisa astra hai jisme sangsar ke saare entities ka strength jor ke banta hai....Saare entities....Us astra ke ahvahan se, saare devtaon ko apni shakti deni padti hai...saare manushya ko apni shakti, saare jeevon ko apni shakti deni padti hai....Mahadev ke is astra mein, Brahmastra, Brhamashirastra, Brahmandastra, Narayanastra, Gandharvastra, Vaishnavastra...plus plus saare baaki astra ki shakti hoti hai, kyunki saare devtaaon ko, deviyon ko apni shakti deni hota hai Paashupatastra mein aisa agreement (lol) hai....Yeh astra Mahadev ne Karna ko nehi diya.....Arjun ko diya.... Kavach kundal diya par return mein Indrastra/Vasav Shaktiastra maang liya....Arjun ne nehi maanga koi astra....kyunki woh sarvottam NAR hain...jise Narayan ne chuna gyan ke liye....Nar Narayan ka concept samjho ....aur Karn ke naam pe mooth marna band karo....

[@adityarajaram3124]

@@Arajokota Passhupatashtra can not harm vijay dhanush.

[@adityarajaram3124]

​@@Arajokota he never ask for indrastra in return after doing donation because it will spoil the integrety of the donation...it was when Indra himself offer him Indrastra as vardan. Kavach Kunal can not break by any astra. He was ajay...Even if you have thrown indrasta on Kavach kundal karn it wont harm him at all. It was absoulute defense. Even Shri Krishna's Sudarshana Chakra can not break his kavach. So first read carefully about mahabharat. then form your opinion. there are lot of loop holes in the stories.

[@Arajokota]

@@adityarajaram3124 Mahadev came and told you this? Personally? And Pashupatastra was to be shot at Vijay Dhanush? Or weilder of Vijay Dhanush....Does logic say that astras can be nullified by the means from which astras are shot? Pashupatastra is the astra of Pinaak Pani...Pinaak is the first dhanush in the world that PinaakPaani created and gave weapons education to the world. Then Pinaak Paani used Pinaak to his hearts content and fucked the shit out of Tripur. No one can match the ultimate or penultimate weapons of the Holy Trinity. Pashupatastra is the penultimate weapon of Pinaak Paani. You really think, Kavach Kundal or Vijay Dhanush would have stopped Sudarshan or Trishul? Is there any boon energy or astra that the Holy Trinity cannot nullify? Krishna himself said it didn't he, that there is no boon, no astra, no energy that he can't fuck the shit out of. Krishna was drunk? Do you know which Kavach Shankhachur had? Even Veerbhadra's Trishul put a hole in in it. Who are Nar Narayan? Who were they in previous birth? Why didn't Krishna choose Karna? Nar is Narayan and Narayan is Nar. Arjun is Krishna, and Krishna is Arjun. Arjun's weapons could have become Sudarshan if Krishna wanted. They are inseparable. Didn't Arjun vent out his frustration towards Indradev saying he could have killed Karna even with the Kavach Kundal? Do you think Arjun was drunk to make a claim so big? Have Pandavas ever made a claim that would be over and above their capabilities? The serials glorified Karna, everyone started masturbation in Karna's name. Yet he was destined to die like a pig after all his adharmas...the prime one being calling Draupadi a ****. You are a Nar, behave like a Nar. Stay on Krishna's side. I know more than you can imagine. I have by hearted KMG Mahabharat...Go and find out who is KMG and what his contribution is towards Mahabharat as we know it today.

[@Arajokota]

@@adityarajaram3124 Do you know about the fight between Vishwamitra and Vasishtha? Problem is the explosion when something strong is match with an equally strong weapon. How can an infallible weapon not break a kavach? It will, but the explosion will be too much too handle. Or else, Indra would not had taken the Kavach. Similar or slightly less powerful Kavach Drona also had, Brahma Kavach. Why didn't Indra take it? Shankhachur's Kavach was infallible. And PinaakPaani was going to strike it with his Trishul, Narayan did what he had to and took a curse on himself just so that the destruction resulting from an infallible weapon striking an indestructible shield doesn't destroy the universe.

[@mohitraj9237]

Karan danvir tha.. Sbse bada danvir aur daan se bada kch nhi hota.

[@rohitchaudhary3709]

Ese to ravan bhi mha gyani tha mha pandit tha ramji se hr chij m shresth tha lekin tha to charitr ka gira hua or adharmi isliye har gya tha same chij karn k sth hua usne bhi adharm ka sth diya isliye vo bhi hara

[@mohitraj9237]

@@rohitchaudhary3709 ravan shri ram se shreshth tha har chiz me? Lol 😹 get some brain kiddo.

[@rohitchaudhary3709]

@@mohitraj9237 Phle dang se pad mere reply ko mene bola charitr or dharm m ramji hi bde the uske alawa to hr chij m ravan jyada bdiya tha chahe vo knowledge m ho bhakti m ho ya rajya m sb ravan k pas jyada tha lekin fir bhi vo hara kyunki vo tha adharmi hi

[@vishwaajithpemmasani1198]

Aisa kya daan de diya Karn ne zara bataiye to

[@killmonger86896]

No he was as bad as Duryodhana, his character is whitewashed in TV series. He wasn't a Shudra. His foster father was a Kshatriya and third son of King of Kashi, his mother was a Brahmin. They were rich landlords not someone living in a hut. That's a fake narrative of TV serials. He desired Draupadi too so incited Duryodhana to assault her. He was like a one sided lover taking revenge. Yes he was daani etc n had good qualities too but then no one is 💯 black or white in Mahabharat. All have shades of grey, but he was certainly not the victim like he is portrayed.

[@jugalpanchal7670]

These mam has an avatar of Arjuna I think ,she always ready to argue about karna 😂😂 and she knows very well karna is the son of Surya deva , after lord Krishna onlys Surya deva is the first lord who learned " bhagwadgita " then mam think why karna is wrong just think it's all about karma not about karna

[@vishtrinity]

Ami ganatra trying to whitewash mistakes of pandavas by showing karna in badlight...why dont u talk about the nagaraj vishwasen episode..if karna was so evil or as u say a mediocre warrior he would have accepted the offer of vishwasen to kill arjun by venom but he dint.

[@omeglefunny3023]

He actually would've killed 4 Pandavas Bhim yudhisthira nakul sahadev if not for promise to his mother Kunti. He was powerful and righteous yes he made mistake by calling the draupadi prostitute but she also called him sutaputra infront of thousands people during swayamvar

[@Red-Hood12]

Do you know? - Karna was ALREADY MARRIED (Having two wives, having children also) before Draupadi's Swayamvar. Karna was 20+ years older than Pandavas and Draupadi was even 5-7+ younger than Pandavas. Draupadi was the age of Karna’s 👧daughter😮. So if Draupadi was 25, Karna was already 50+ years old man, if Draupadi had to rejected Karna, it should be like - “Theheroo, mein is BUDDHE Karna UNCLE se shaadi nahin karungi“….🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Red-Hood12]

​@@omeglefunny3023she didn't called him suta-putra,, she called him UNCLE.. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@Red-Hood12]

Karna was the main VILLAN of Mahabharata... 😂😂😂😂😂

[@omeglefunny3023]

@@Red-Hood12 karna was just 2 year older than Yudhisthira btw... Your reference of age is so misleading hence proven Mahabharata is not relevant text

[@sanatani2528]

Mai v pdha hu Mahabharata yai kuch v bolrhi iske chacha the lgta h vedvyas hrr kuch kaan me btaye h

[@shikhasidney844]

Jab ek Kshatriya purush ek Brahmin stree se vivaah karte hai tab unka baccha sut kaha jata hai. Jab yoh same baccha ek sut se hi vivaah karta hai tab unke bachhe ko kya kehta hai? Use bhi sut kaha jata hai. Un same bache ke successors sut se hi vivaah kar sakte hai. Toh ho sakta hai ke hundreds of years pehle sut ke ancestors ek Kshatriya purush aur Brahmin stree te

[@apurvavinod5613]

Your Karma determines your Varna - Focus on Education - Brahmin, Focus on Strength and Fighting - Kshatriya. Focus on Business - Vaishya. Focus on Services and Small business - Shudra. Nothing is permanent.

[@vivekpadman5248]

JAI SHREE KARNA 🧡🚩

[@agentravi00007]

galat logo se inspiration sab hamesha dusro ko dosh dena victim card khelna

[@vivekpadman5248]

@@agentravi00007 Teri kyu jali bhai 🤣

[@agentravi00007]

@@vivekpadman5248 Muje kuch nahi wo tum apne consequence khud bhugato jis tarah bhugata tha

[@agentravi00007]

@@vivekpadman5248 mein jalti karna ko jyada dikhya jata galat narrative mein bolunga

[@vivekpadman5248]

@@agentravi00007 kuch nahi samjha?

[@ameynaik04]

She has good data to make sense...

[@pragneshkumar2517]

Inhone ne to ye bhi bol diya tha hanumanji ke pass gada nahi thi tab galiya de rahe the 😂...aur karn ke bare me negative bol do to waah waah 😂

[@sanjananair7884]

​@@pragneshkumar2517unhone ye nahi bola ki gadha nahi hai, but ramayan main gadha nahi thi badmain kuber ne gift kri thi. Aur Hanuman ji ne khud kaha ki unki sabse badi Shakti Ram naam hai, unhe aur kisi shastra ki zarurat nahi

[@KulamaniBehera-y7h]

To ami madam. Was karna not being treated rudely by the contemprary society still then duryodhan was loving him taking aside caste and creed. Krishna did not marry radha because she was belonged to peasant.

[@RohitAttri-ti6hw]

jitna simple karn ka character explain kr diya utna simple bhi nahi jati main pakshpaat tha tb bhi aur aaj bhi hai iss baat se hm kbhi inkaar nahi kr skte

[@vikeshthakur9633]

Karan ke paas kundal kavach tha kya?

[@ice-nx8yc]

No ... 😂😂😂😂😂 Karna ek bcha tha Jo Chahta usko hra kr chla jata tha .. according to BkL group

[@GvenkatNarayana]

Bas ab ye samajh chuka hun ..ki start plus, Sony aur ye ma'am ki baatein....mein kehta hun ab in sab ko sunna chodo .. apney aap ko ek acha insaan banao.....

[@texaswinter1]

Long Story Short- No Caste System existed in Hinduism. 😅😅

[@gravewalker34]

You can look at dna data. Caste is only 2000 year old. And mahabharat is 1400 bce event as per archaeologists. UK still practices caste hierarchy. Its present and was present in all societies. Without hierarchy there is no functioning. A general cant perform duty of president. Similarly a laborer cant be treated as president.

[@peacedmind9300]

If u say mahabhart is 1400 bce. And if u believe that everything is present in the puranas. Can u please elaborate about why there is no description of dinosaurs ?

[@gravewalker34]

@@peacedmind9300 dinosaurs in puranas? 🤣

[@apurvavinod5613]

Your Karma determines your Varna - Focus on Education - Brahmin, Focus on Strength and Fighting - Kshatriya. Focus on Business - Vaishya. Focus on Services and Small business - Shudra. Nothing is permanent.

[@apurvavinod5613]

Caste is not our word. We have Kul (Family), Jati (Ethnicity), Varna (Education and Occupation).

[@chander8234]

Karan = Son of Surya☀️ & Devi Kunti Adhirath & Radha ne ☀️Karan🏹 ko Paala tha.

[@debamlyabanerjee4067]

Par wo ek bura insaan tha

[@rhitickdas1790]

Even Krishna mentioned he is the great Archer so he is not evil okay

[@Divine_Vibes_]

@@rhitickdas1790 says a 13 year random kid on yt

[@rhitickdas1790]

@@Divine_Vibes_ please clear it properly. I'm not understanding

[@ritesh_x__]

I understand what you said mam but I have one question that if karna was such type of person that you are describing then why did Shree krishna praised him and even said that his name will taked by the people for ages, a true warrior. And as we know krishna knew everything about averyone then there must be a reason that made him different from others.

[@swapnilmishra3537]

Krishna praised duryodhana too ram praised ravan many times too it doesn't mean anything it just shows how good krishna nd Ram is

[@swapnilmishra3537]

Nd Krishna has also said karna is evil in Mahabharata but ur fake tv serials wouldn't show u that nd just read karn parv what Krishna said to Arjun about karn before ordering Arjun to kill that adharmi karn u will understand

[@ritesh_x__]

​@@swapnilmishra3537Ooo. So that's the case. Thanks brother❤

[@swapnilmishra3537]

@@ritesh_x__ read Mahabharata bro If u can purchase it or u can try reading in pdf form for free on internet u will understand everything nd how karna was so evil like duryodhana nd how karna lost to Arjuna fairly every single time nd he used to run away from Arjun

[@swapnilmishra3537]

@@ritesh_x__ try reading Mahabharata book u can purchase it or u can read it for free in pdf form then u will understand who was Arjun nd why he defeated karna fairly every single time

[@mahimang..1557]

Karn galat tha but itna nai jitna AMI ji bata rahi hai Hum kaise Maan le ki RASHMIRATHI or MIRTUNJAYA ke writer galat hai Mahabharat ke writer galat hai sirf or sirf AMI ji sahi kaise ho sakti hai

[@RajIshwar-vv2xh]

Kid these were novels a work of fiction not Mahabharata facts stop running behind novelists like Amish Tripathi read Mahabharata

[@omeglefunny3023]

Amiji is uppercaste women she will always spew venom on lowercast people forgetting that Karna was eldest son of kunti and suryawanshi much better than illegitimate Pandus children

[@Red-Hood12]

Do you know? - Karna was ALREADY MARRIED (Having two wives, having children also) before Draupadi's Swayamvar. Karna was 20+ years older than Pandavas and Draupadi was even 5-7+ younger than Pandavas. Draupadi was the age of Karna’s 👧daughter😮. So if Draupadi was 25, Karna was already 50+ years old man, if Draupadi had to rejected Karna, it should be like - “Theheroo, mein is BUDDHE Karna UNCLE se shaadi nahin karungi“….🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@CaptainHomelander]

11:53 Waah madam waah matlab kuchh achchha kiya tab bhi criticize karne ka bahana chahiye, Daityaraj Bali ne bhi kiya tha daan Shukracharya ke mana karne ke baad bhi to unhone b galat hi kiya tha na... completely biased

[@sakkoyaba4482]

As a muslim mera deemag hil gaya woh sunke😂

[@CaptainHomelander]

@@sakkoyaba4482 She is just being completely aur last me bol bhi de rahi ki safe khel jaaun

[@aviralrichhariya1550]

bali had really great qualities and later went to become the indra too

[@deepsen2503]

All those so called Mahabharat readers are un aware including this lady that nobody has read original Mahabharat written by Sage Ved Vyas as it's lost in the course of time.All the so called Mahabharat readers are reading some modified version of that as those emerged by different writers in the course of time. So there is nothing wrong with the modern day writers or directors presenting the script in new way. Even this lady herself here to promote her version!So Stop this drama.

[@neildhami7041]

How are you so sure which one is correct version and which one is not?

[@Arjun-te9bh]

You just said we can add anything to the story. We have manuscripts of Mahabharata which is older than your whole leniage. We have the best older versions by Vaishambayana and BORI made critical edition after researching almost half century with these manuscripts. So saying that there is no authentic Mahabharata is really a wrong statement.

[@kumarkripa88]

Dron ko jabardasti Arjun ko mahan ghosit karna tha, karn ki chhodo eklavya ka angutha kyun katwa diya tha dron ne taki wo uske pirye shishya arjun se aage na nikal jaye

[@MrDevil643]

Kyunki dronacharya baigan ka bharta bana na nahi sikharahatha Jo eklavya chod deta isliye

[@arpeggiatedcoda]

Drona was a bit partial towards Arjuna, which can be said as a critique for him. But the son of a Saptarishi, i.e. Guru Dronacharya didnt deny to teach Karna Brahmastra just because of his partiality. It is clearly stated in Mahabharata that Guru Drona saw malice in his intentions, because Karna was always jealous of Arjuna for possessing superior skills, being so obedient, having a learned big brother like Dharmaraja and having a friend like Shri Krishna. He learnt his archery skills and everything from Guru Drona, with his comrades like Duryodhana. When Guru Drona denied to teach him Brahmastra, he took leave from him and went to Lord Parshurama, lied about his identity to learn about powerful astras.

[@mukeshlivestrong]

Blamed Karna squarely for the yudh! this is the problem with allegories open to interpretation and personal bias. If you look at it objectively, all characters were 50 shades of grey. The actual cause of war was not karna, the foundation was already set by Pandavas themselves. those who are willing gamble their state, people and even their wife are the worst on the scale of evil. The war was also won by a supposedly virtuous side based on deceit and lies. there are just lessons to be learnt, but it was not a war of right vs wrong. Karna's kavach/Kundal were no ordinary ornaments, you are just describing as if he gave away something petty to show-off how daan-veer he was, such pathetic logic.

[@kshitij472]

And that's your interpretation 😊

[@RakeshSingh-rt7bt]

Have you ever read Vedavyas Mahabharata once? If Pandavas are to be blamed then tell me 1. why Duryodhana poisoned Bhim in childhood with the help of karna 2. Why the Lakshagrah kand happened ( was it Pandavas fault?) 3. Why Kauravas invited Pandavas for gambling 4. Why the did Chhal during gambling? ( If Kauravas had played fairly then the result would have been different)?

[@mukeshlivestrong]

@@RakeshSingh-rt7bt These are all allegories designed to make one side look better. if the same acts were done by the other side, they are evil. It doesn't make a difference which version you have read and believe in. Why did Pandava go for the gamble in the first place? they were not some kids or some bechara Why did Yudhistar gable his wife? they are suppose to be righteous, isn't it? why is he called Dharamraj? Would you share you wife with your siblings just because your mother said so (unknowingly)? Each side is filled with darkness. the entire war was based on a weak premise, but it was called dharam yudh. There was more deceit done by Pandavas and Krishna himself. How do you justify all that? you place someone on a high place, then everything is absolved.

[@RakeshSingh-rt7bt]

@@mukeshlivestrong well you didn't answer any of my questions... 1. Pandavas was invited with the ill intention by Dhritrashtra, becouse Pandavas were dharmik that's why the accepted the order of their uncle ( apne se badho ki aagya palan Dharm hai, jese Sriram ne apne pitaji ke Vachan ka maan rkhne ke liye vanavas accept Kiya tha) And at that not accepting chalenge of war and gamble was considered as cowardice.( Here you're egnoring the social customs of that time) 2. Betting wife and brother on gambling was bad and for this Pandavas went for 13 years of exile.(Although yudhishthir did that as the last hope to win the game, Again you're egnoring the unfair tactics used by Kauravas.) 3. If a man can have multiple wife why can't a women have multiple husband...( The region I belong to before the Hindu code Bill was enacted this multiple husband wife system was prevalent).. If you don't believe in this story of being Dharma vs Adharma then its better to stay away from the things that you don't believe in.. You don't believe what Vedavyas ji had written then don't read...! Oh God you're saying that know Dharma more that bhagwan Srikrishna...

[@mukeshlivestrong]

@@RakeshSingh-rt7bt "you're saying that know Dharma more that Bhagwan Srikrishna..." - I am not saying this, you said it. "If a man can have multiple wife why can't a women have multiple husband...( The region I belong to before the Hindu code Bill was enacted this multiple husband wife system was prevalent).." - be as it may, would you do that. would you accept that today? would you accept that for someone who you hold on high pedestal? badon ki agya ka palan dharam hai, par apni wife of daav per lagana adharam Nahin hai. bade log bhee the udhar jab Draupadi ki cheer haran hua. bade doesn't necessarily earn respect, you have to earn that. I am not ignoring any facts. I said already both sides were dark and deceitful. this is not a story of good vs evil. this is just 50 shades for grey. there is not much to believe here, it is a story with a lot of lessons to learn. but no side was righteous.

[@NakulsinghDhouni]

आखिर, बोले भगवान् सभी को देख व्याकुल हताश । 'अर्जुन ! देखो, किस तरह कर्ण सारी सेना पर टूट रहा, किस तरह पाण्डवों का पौरुष होकर अशङक वह लूट रहा । देखो जिस तरफ़, उधर उसके ही बाण दिखायी पडते हैं, बस, जिधर सुनो, केवल उसके हुङकार सुनायी पडते हैं ।' 'कैसी करालता ! क्या लाघव ! कितना पौरुष ! कैसा प्रहार ! किस गौरव से यह वीर द्विरद कर रहा समर-वन में विहार ! व्यूहों पर व्यूह फटे जाते, संग्राम उजडता जाता है, ऐसी तो नहीं कमल वन में भी कुञ्जर धूम मचाता है ।' 'इस पुरुष-सिंह का समर देख मेरे तो हुए निहाल नयन, कुछ बुरा न मानो, कहता हूं, मैं आज एक चिर-गूढ वचन । कर्ण के साथ तेरा बल भी मैं खूब जानता आया हूं, मन-ही-मन तुझसे बडा वीर, पर इसे मानता आया हूं ।' औ' देख चरम वीरता आज तो यही सोचता हूं मन में, है भी कोई, जो जीत सके, इस अतुल धनुर्धर को रण में ? मैं चक्र सुदर्शन धरूं और गाण्डीव अगर तू तानेगा, तब भी, शायद ही, आज कर्ण आतङक हमारा

[@user-gm3zl9ki5v]

Karn bhagoda thaa .. aur jinko jhut lg raha toh padho aur comment karo

[@viveksen298]

sony tv ने तो कर्ण को भगवान कृष्ण से भी अच्छा बता दिया।

[@Red-Hood12]

Starplus Mahabharata and SONY-PUTRA KARNA TV SHOW ek FAKE Shows hai jo sirf Karna FANS ke liye hi banaye gayee hai, magar inmein bhi karna apne raath kaa pahiyaa uthaane mei asamarth hai, ye hai uski taakat. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@GovindSingh-mb3ty]

Bhai ye sab jatibad failane mai lage hue h