Excellent people. Excellent culture and comprehensive information about kargil and other civilisations
@mohammadfarooqshah3796Ай бұрын
Kargil was separated from Kashmir against the wishes of both Kargil and Kashmir. Leh supported Union territory status but in the process lost their voice as well as their economy. More and more outsiders from outside the region are taking over their economy.
@irfanshalistaniАй бұрын
Love from Ladakh vlogs ❤
@kargilstudio8467Ай бұрын
Big fan of your vlogs sir
@muhammadjaved3330Ай бұрын
Kashmir aur Ladakh inshallah phir se mil k ek State bny ga agr Yaha k log united ho k Koshish krain
@KMH24915 күн бұрын
Thanks for the best documentary 🔥🔥
@NazirAhmad-u9n5uАй бұрын
Bhut sukoon sa milta h jab buzrogun ke zman se qadim zmane ki tarekh byan hoti h , Aap ka bhut shokriya
Very good program ma’am on Kashmir, Leh n Ladakh..lots of love n encouragement for bringing such good n knowledgeable program, from Assam India.. pl come n see till Arunachal Pradesh India also.. We welcome you all..
@Masroor_0023 күн бұрын
Great vlogs and often very helpful! Me From Bandipora, Kashmir Studying at AMU ❤️
@AhsanaliPeerАй бұрын
Nice collection ❤
@MohdAli-kv4zmАй бұрын
Bohoot behtareen❤❤
@zanul2033Ай бұрын
2 year working experience in Kashmir i feel and i thought what happened in 2019 is best thing happened for kargil . . I badly missing ladakh people’s . Whre you in Kashmir you have no respect and trusted ! Yah their more reason but thought concludes above
@ethicalmemeing7060Ай бұрын
Half of my family including my mother has worked in Kashmir for years. They have the opposite thing to say. I personally know some kashmiris who are the most hospitable people. What happened in 2019 was a catastrophe for Kargil. Those in Leh who were dancing are now crying. So keep your personal prejudices to yourself.
@BashirAhmad-wq8fhАй бұрын
Informative video. Ghar bathay Ladhak ka sair kiya.......! Shukriya
@ladakhmyheartАй бұрын
We the kargilis are very happy by separating with kashmiris...
@SadiqaBanoo-et3slАй бұрын
Visit our beautiful suru valley mam plz
@Zahra1713428 күн бұрын
Work Hard ❤
@salmanmajeed196625 күн бұрын
Mai ladakha sa ho k himichal paradesh gya ho both maza hai kargil leh ladakh mai
@Default011anomm28 күн бұрын
Kargil and kashir 🫶🤝
@D.c.biruliАй бұрын
Good vedio
@premanandadas1476Ай бұрын
Jay Hind Jay Bharat❤❤❤❤❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🆗
@KasheeeeeeerАй бұрын
🤡
@Dardistan_KashmirАй бұрын
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty. The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others: § It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur); § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution; § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated); § Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent; § Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and § If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir..................
@AmitSamkariya-jt5rtАй бұрын
It’s so sad that just because of religion people of Kargil refuse to accept their similarities with rest of Buddhist ladakhis. Their language and culture is similar but just because of islam they feel they are more connected with Kashmir.
@SHADOW-ih8huАй бұрын
no bro kargil has diverse cultures and ethnic groups like the shina and aryans of batalik region the have different cultures
@beautifullyugly5056Ай бұрын
Leh is also 50-50 muslim Buddhist. This is nothing related to religion. Also kargil takes decisions independently but it's more closer to leh than to Srinagar. There are numerous marriages between leh and Kargil. This women shows Kashmir side only
@showkatali3235Ай бұрын
Visit suru valley ❤❤❤
@hanifch9373Ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@geeeemrezaeian775Ай бұрын
👏👏👏👏
@53abrahimele73Ай бұрын
👍
@ZeenathKauserАй бұрын
🌈❤👍
@HusainGhulam-n1t26 күн бұрын
Ladakh was not part of j & k before Dogra attack, it's true
@muhammadjaved3330Ай бұрын
Jammu kashmir k log aj b Kargil Ladakh ko aur Yaha k logo ko apna smjty hn hmary Liye ajj b Ladakh Alag nhi h ut bnanay se koi hmary dilo se Pyr KTM kr k hmy Dil SE Alag nhi kr skta. dusri states Alag hn lakhabnpur se agy aur Himachal Pradesh wagaira Alag state hn.jamm valley Ladakh ko hum ek he smjty hn
@Shahid65319Ай бұрын
par ham Ladakh Wale nahi mantey thumay apna😂😂
@Heung347Ай бұрын
Kargil (ladakh)
@danikhan662Ай бұрын
I live in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the road from here to Srinagar is not open, it is closed by India, this line of control is made by India and Pakistan, due to which we cannot go to our other Kashmir, Kashmiri people.. 😢
@rishabhgulati2244Ай бұрын
Pakistan occupied kashmir kaisa lag raha hai wahan pr Bharat k log aapse acha ji rhe hai pure kashmir mein kargil mein tumhe Pakistan kya diya hai kuch nhi Pakistani tumhare resources kha rhe hai sare pok Bharat ka tha Bharat ka hai or hamesha Bharat ka hi rahega..yad rakhna
@danikhan662Ай бұрын
@@rishabhgulati2244 Vo Kashmir be Hamra h ... Jammu Kashmir State Parts .. Jammu, Kashmir, Gilgit Baltistan, Laddakh...
@danikhan662Ай бұрын
@@rishabhgulati2244 Both Country's India and Pakistan Terrorist.... ❌️❌️😡😡😡
@rishabhgulati2244Ай бұрын
Pakistan bna 1947 mein. jammu kashmir ka maharaja the hindu. Jammu kashmir par phele attack Kiya Pakistan ki fauj ne. Pakistan ki fauj ne POK pr zabardasti kabza Kiya hua hai.. tumhe islam k naam pr pagal bna rhe hai Pakistani.. Jaa kr Lahore dekho sare tumhare resources khaa rahe hai Pakistani
@rishabhgulati2244Ай бұрын
Jammu kashmir belongs to bharat ye humare sir ka Taj hai agar islamic log na aate to aaj ye sab problem hi nahi hota na hi Pakistan banta na bangladesh banta nahi jammu kashmir mein koi problem khadi hoti
@danikhan662Ай бұрын
I Miss you Srinagar Jammu Kashmir. 😢💔
@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdАй бұрын
Keep missing..
@iftikharaftab18Ай бұрын
Aapko badgam area visit karna chahiye thaaa u will get the real picture of partition of 1947 ,1971 and how people suffered, still their dear ones are in Pakistan..............
@humaira2248Ай бұрын
Where in Budgam?
@aijazansari7242Ай бұрын
@@humaira224810 kms from Kargil town
@iftikharaftab18Ай бұрын
@@humaira2248 kargil badgam
@humaira2248Ай бұрын
@@iftikharaftab18 ok
@izharashiqАй бұрын
kargil to Akchamal 2.5 kilometres 😅
@thesplashoffountain7112 күн бұрын
Mangbore mahalla is the starting village of akchamal and it is 2.5 km ....
@HassanBaba-v9nАй бұрын
Madam suru valley mai dekhlo
@Abrarkhanladakh5675Ай бұрын
Kargil wala jk state ka sath khush tha aur UT sirf leh walon ka demand tha aur kargil walon ko UT thopa gaya hai aur aj leh wala b roraha hai UT sa 370 aur 35 a sab sa best land aur job security tha ab 6th schedule maang raha hai job security hona chahye land security nhi hona chahye
@MyWrongАй бұрын
we people of ladakh arent kashmiris so please dont include ladakh or any part of it with kashmir thankyou
@drmasoodcriticalcare1188Ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@MyWrongАй бұрын
@drmasoodcriticalcare1188 is it funny
@premanandadas147629 күн бұрын
@@MyWrongyou part of Ladakh🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Ambivert-q4fАй бұрын
Pehle bolte hain aur bht tarqee ho gya phir ek dm bolte hain tarqee toh kya ho gya😂😂
@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdАй бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@asifhaydari1009Ай бұрын
Ak dam jazbat balde de halat badle dey 😂
@Dardistan_KashmirАй бұрын
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty. The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others: § It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur); § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution; § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated); § Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent; § Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and § If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir......................
@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdАй бұрын
Useless and misleading commentary 😂😂😂😂😂
@premanandadas147629 күн бұрын
"""""""""""Bhikharistan"""""""""""""🥴🥴😫😫😇😇😇😇🇮🇳🇮🇳
@danikhan662Ай бұрын
I love Jammu Kashmir State Peoples ❤.
@Dardistan_KashmirАй бұрын
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty. The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others: § It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur); § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution; § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated); § Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent; § Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and § If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir.................
@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdАй бұрын
@@Dardistan_Kashmir Hello no such long n waste of time writing needed. Today Pakistan has become a complete Bhikharistan 😂😂😂 if self determination right is given to Pakistanis then they will side with Bharat that is India 🇮🇳 so forget about JnK.. Pakistan occupied Kashmiris today would be regretting already 😂😂😂😂😂
@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdАй бұрын
Jammu n Kashmir has no relationship with Bhikharistan that is Pakistan 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I was recently in kargil There is nothing only Sand and open mountains don't compare kargil with our beautiful country kashmir
@fadedsoul612716 күн бұрын
Who is comparing atanwadi and peace loving people..
@SmartScope8k16 күн бұрын
@fadedsoul6127 😂
@ahmadjaffar1488Ай бұрын
Wellcome in kargil.... ❤❤❤ Yahang koie khatra nahi hai yah sab jhooth hai
@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdАй бұрын
Pakistan tohode hi janha Khatra ho.. Bhikharistan that’s is Pakistan 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@SameenaZehraaАй бұрын
We Kargil people don't want us to be associated with Kashmir. Please don't portray 1% of population as a narrative. Disgusting. We had a different status from leh regarding UT but we would associate ourselves more with leh rather than kashmir. Leh and Kargil are atleast peaceful and without any terrorist activity.