Sadly, since filming took place, Max Fordham, pioneer of sustainable design and leader in the field of engineering low energy buildings, has died. We send our best wishes to the whole Max Fordham team at this time
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
you lot at the economist are manipulative liars
@User-he6zd2 жыл бұрын
@@richardcowley4087 in what way? The economist is generally one of the more trustworthy outlets
@questioneverything36322 жыл бұрын
@@User-he6zd 😂
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
@@User-he6zd everything they say and everything they claim, is that clear enough ? are you going to blindly accept what they claim and say ?
@tranganh48322 жыл бұрын
i'm so sorry to hear that =(((
@xena25592 жыл бұрын
He's living a luxurious life. And it's warm there. In Poland some poorest people turn off the heating quite often when the temps oscillate at 0°. The room temp is between 15 - 18°.They heat water in pots to have just a basic wash everyday to save on bills.
@David-bi6lf2 жыл бұрын
Air source heat pumps are the next mis selling scandal. Most UK homes aren't suitable for them because the amount and temperature of heat is lower. The house needs to be well insulated most arnt. This won't stop untruthful people trying to make a quick buck out of selling them to people in unsuitable homes.
@humphreybradley30602 жыл бұрын
Insulation before installation are the key watch words in the industry
@jimflagg40092 жыл бұрын
Its not just heat. It is cooling too. Cooling needs electricity which uses carbon. The hotter the planet gets the more cooling we will need.
@BIoknight0002 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps can run in reverse too which can be used to heat or cool
@jimflagg40092 жыл бұрын
@@BIoknight000 When they run in reverse it is the same as a peltier cooler which uses electricity to pump the heat out. Still using Carbon.
@BIoknight0002 жыл бұрын
@@jimflagg4009 IF the power source is carbon-based. But something that uses fossil fuels for electricity today can use a carbon-free source tomorrow. Installing millions of heat pumps still has benefits
@jimflagg40092 жыл бұрын
@@BIoknight000 There are only a few carbon free energies...Nuclear, Wind and Hydro.
@battlefronter0072 жыл бұрын
@@jimflagg4009 Based on the Environmental damage Hydro will never be green 90 % of the time. Especially the smaller ones
@bbygrlpt22 жыл бұрын
Its all about insulation! I live in NYC an old apartment building and so much cold air sips in from windows so they keep the radiators working more than they need to.
@dustintacohands11072 жыл бұрын
Bro you could cut energy use for heating In half this country if you helped some folks seal up…. My old apartment was so bad I had to run full blast alllll day to heat to normal. So I f I wanted to to hear whole month would have cost around 1500 for a two bedroom small one story apartment
@michelem.61042 жыл бұрын
Excellent points covered here. No perfect solutions but here's my suggestions: * Stop ignoring the basic's (extremely efficient insulation). We need to reduce the costs of VIPs & VIGs (Vacuum insulated Panels & Vacuum insulated Glass). Wide scale use of these (cars, houses, refrigerators etc) would significantly reduce power demands. * Overbuild off-shore wind farms and rooftop solar. Any surplus energy could be stored (batteries, pumped hydro, etc)--and when these are "full", dump the excess into H2 production. This H2 would be essentially free--since the surplus power would otherwise be wasted. * Get rid of ALL fossil fuel 'base load' power plants. Add small/modular nuclear plants (preferably Thorium) as needed to supplement battery storage. * All EV's should have V2X (vehicle-to-grid, vehicle-to-house, vehicle-to-vehicle) capability. This way every EV (car, bus, truck etc.) is dual use--and thus, a potential mini power plant.
@kloss2132 жыл бұрын
I designed my passive home 15 years ago located in WI and even in the coldest winters I can heat with just a few baseboard electrics if it's sunny out but cold -15f I can still have rooms in the upper 70s without any heat on. House is designed to not freeze without any power or heat on. And I can cool 2200sqft with a single bedroom AC unit sized for 10x12ft room. Plus home can take 125+ mph winds without much damage.
@islandpersuasion46902 жыл бұрын
What did you do?
@haewooroy99502 жыл бұрын
By reading Economist, everyone can get warm. Cuz you’ll get angry, and anger makes our body to heat up. BTW reading is super eco-friendly.
@jonlawrence192 жыл бұрын
why?
@BIoknight0002 жыл бұрын
I live in Florida and my house is so well insulated I cool it down to the low 60s at night when power rates are low and it stays cool all day. This works for me cause my house is well insulated and my power company lets me use pay different rates based on peak hourse
@tinabraxton49062 жыл бұрын
I had a heat pump in the house I used to own. It never kept the house warm at all. The house was in a place with cooler winters than South Africa, but not nearly as cold as England.
@marthak16182 жыл бұрын
The technology has improved or, more correctly, the added retrofit cost of better technology has come down. Ground sourced (vs air) should really be standard/mandatory for all new construction.
@jezalb27102 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps are common in Sweden. But their buildings are insulated. Properly like
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
@@jezalb2710 not all swedish buildings
@jezalb27102 жыл бұрын
@@richardcowley4087 yet air heat pumps are common
@pghbh3812 жыл бұрын
Judging by the comments from personal experience, seems clear that insulation, heat pumps, and green hydrogen are all necessary, and in many parts of the planet, in the same home.
@Feynman9812 жыл бұрын
Green Hydrogen is only necessary is you want to flatten your neighbourhood. Like people with dementia do year by year. Better go for regular electricity. It’s way safer for everyone.
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing as green hydrogen explain in your own words how hydrogen is made and by which process ?
@wulung59432 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps require electricity. If the electricity is generated with fossil fuels, there is only small savings in CO2 emissions. Insulation is the most cost effective way for UK.
@larrysepicmovies50442 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps do NOT work well in cold climates. Only moderate climates.
@David-bi6lf2 жыл бұрын
Ground source heat pumps are far better but hugely expensive and require large areas of land on a house by house basis. Other countries are building district ground source heat pumps on new housing developments before the houses are built. Makes sense. Must work out way cheaper to build per house. Of course not seen anything like in the UK, still building new houses with individual gas boilers.
@r0169762 жыл бұрын
Disagree GSHP are the same as ASHP. However for my home I was advised I'd need a 1000m of pipe laying. That's half an acre! And then neither really work in cold weather as they are essentially electric rads. Much better with a clay core rad linked to solar and battery storage. Also as the GDHP was £35k and the clay core rads plus battery plus solar was £20k it's almost half price. However it will be less than half price next year as battery prices are falling rapidly.
@hangender2 жыл бұрын
the law of thermodynamics state that in order to have cooling, there must be heating else where.
@lawerancelanham2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Remove it from here, then it has to go there. What we really need is geothermal but that is a more expensive concept that only the wealthy can acquire.
@WizardOfCheese2 жыл бұрын
Increase the prices, lower the cost of going green, problem solved. You don't need to convince people then, they'll switch themselves.
@czarbayu2 жыл бұрын
The title of this video is misleading. Heat pump still need fossil fuel. But with the same heat generated, heat pump just need 1/3 of the fossil fuel compared to boiler or heater. .
@FelipeElLocito2 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps rely on electricity so whether they use fossil fuels or not depends on how that electricity is generated.
@vylbird80142 жыл бұрын
They need electricity, anyway. How much of that comes from fossil fuels depends on country. Though a properly set up ground-source heat pump can get a COP so high, it's actually more efficient than burning the gas in your own home even allowing for transmission losses.
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
@@FelipeElLocito dont rely on wind and solar for that
@sifisothwala11822 жыл бұрын
The metrics on RSA's stats are a bit off but I know what Mokoena is going thru. It is extremely difficult to leave fossil fuel is our country. But I realized that with a bit of investment in Solar power and retrofitting our poor built homes and being cautious with our energy use maybe we can have a better future.
@SmithAdam-bu9xv2 жыл бұрын
totally agree
@davebauman49912 жыл бұрын
When will they finally use these heat pumps to remove the excess heat from the London Underground tubes to repurpose thermal energy?
@christophercox64522 жыл бұрын
*When it comes to the world of investing,most people don't know where to start.fortunately,great investors of the past and present can provide us with guidance*
@AustinHilton5.2 жыл бұрын
Same here, I made $12,400 profits on investing since I started trading with Mr Grey Smith his trading strategies are too notch am winning consistently trading with Mr Grey Smith . He really the best broker I've made a lot of profit investing with him.
@josechristianiniguezboniil39962 жыл бұрын
I trade with him, The profit are secured and over a 100% return on investment directly sent to your wallet.
@rajendratayya84002 жыл бұрын
Sustainability is rationing for survival. It needs physical realisation of the infinite allowing life.
@jimflagg40092 жыл бұрын
It will probably come to that once we start to run short on fossil fuels like coal and gas. Part of the reason I am not having children because because they will be the ones who will suffer. The real problem when you boil it all down is the demand for power keeps going up as we increase our populations. No one wants to hear this so we just put our heads in the sand and keep driving and heating using fossil fuels while making more children which will do the same. We have to break the cycle or the Earth will do it for us.
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
@@jimflagg4009 you have taken the right decision, dont have any children then mankind will not have to suffer more self entitled, two faced liars like you
@jacobs.macauley44202 жыл бұрын
I live in the Pacific Northwest which experienced the heat dome many of our neighbours use oil and natural gas to heat their homes but my household uses a heat pump. The natural gas prices were often cheaper due the structure of electricity prices which rates increase at higher usage which we hit due to our heat pump. We were so thankful as when the Heat Dome hit we could keep cool 😎 we actually offered our house to friends and family to keep cool as the vast majority people in my city don’t have ac. The government currently gives out thousands of dollars of subsidies to switch people who used natural gas to heat pumps which is relatively green in BC as we use hydro or wind to power our grid. Though one of the major issues is if the rates structures aren’t changed to allow for more heat pumps and Evs the transition to greener economy will be harder.
@dashdash_peacecampaign2 жыл бұрын
As a regular consumer, I don’t know if my locality will support Hydrogen or heat pump (assuming I residence even have land), or steam. It is very complicated matter and expensive)
@freeasabird832 жыл бұрын
Current heat pumps need a boiler backup if the weather is too cold
@lorebrown53072 жыл бұрын
Exactly, what happens in the U.K if the gulf stream collapses?
@Marvin-dg8vj2 жыл бұрын
@@lorebrown5307 it cannot unless the earth starts spinning in the other direction or a vast ice appears miraculously out of nowhere to block.
@Skoda1302 жыл бұрын
@@Marvin-dg8vj ehm.. Isn't the "engine" of the gulfstream mainly powered by the difference in temperature, between polar and equatorial regions? Cold water sinking to the bottom at the poles, while heating up at equatorial regions...
@Marvin-dg8vj2 жыл бұрын
@@Skoda130 obviously yes but the point I am trying to make is how anyone can take seriously the claims of climate scientists who believe it switches on and off like an electric light And we run our entire societies on this type of science
@fractalnomics2 жыл бұрын
We should be developing ways to use the greenhouse gases for what they are claimed to do, trap heat. I've made a start.
@busysaru8882 жыл бұрын
First you need to insulate buildings better. That can be done by building an outer shell of hempcreat bricks to the outside. Better yet, build with hempcreat Lego-style bricks to start with. Super insulating of heat and sound and fire resistant if not fireproof. Highly insulated homes need little energy to heat and cool. No-brainer.
@fungussa2 жыл бұрын
Passive buildings are the way to go for most, with retrofitting also being an option.
@beth87752 жыл бұрын
It would be nice to see the US start subsidizing heat pumps. I wish that's what we had done when we put in a new hvac a couple of years ago, but I didn't really know about them then. In the meantime, all I can really do is keep the heat set very low.
@BlackMamba-lt8oe2 жыл бұрын
why should it be subsidised
@haught75762 жыл бұрын
@@BlackMamba-lt8oe we subsidize carbon intensive technologies by not charging the real price of carbon. Nat gas is currently cheaper than heat pumps in the US, but only because the consumer isn’t paying for the environmental damage they are causing. Subsidies for heat pumps will save money, a lot if we embrace them quickly.
@BlackMamba-lt8oe2 жыл бұрын
@@haught7576 so subsidise natural gas
@haught75762 жыл бұрын
@@BlackMamba-lt8oe learn to read
@BlackMamba-lt8oe2 жыл бұрын
@@haught7576 my father is not English, nor is my mother an English teacher
@timkbirchico85422 жыл бұрын
This misses a major point as in we all need to reduce our consumption of electricity green or otherwise. stop the over consumption and replacement of electrical appliances etc. Get with it , we all must reduce our general consumption, convenience at the cost of destroying our home as in the earth is darkly ridiculous. Our addiction to our convenience is our downfall.
@vylbird80142 жыл бұрын
Which is a problem when the economy, and most of society, is built upon maximising consumption and production. If everyone in the developed world decided to life frugally, half of them would be unemployed in a month.
@AndrewAkaHrun2 жыл бұрын
Hydrogen is made from natural gas with massive CO2 emissions. The electricity for heat pumps mostly comes from coal plants if no wind or nuclear.
@freeloader692 жыл бұрын
Two words: geothermal. Okay, so that’s just one word, but it’s enough.
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
Deep Drill geothermal, down to 10.5 miles
@pesteferian59442 жыл бұрын
Air conditioners depend on refrigerant fluid, which is easily lost, so as they age, their power consumption goes up, meanwhile losing cooling power, and they do not have sensors or any way to warn the owner at what is happening (it may easily be fixed by replenishing the fluid), but the majority of people is not even aware of it, and keep rising the power, until they decide that the unit is "not working", and buy an entire new one. It would be easy to provide a sensor and a speaker to tell to the owner that the artifact needs maintenance. Today at best, the units show a numeric signal on a led screen which is cryptic, and nobody cares to find what it means.
@alparslankorkmaz29642 жыл бұрын
Nice video.
@sanjayarnalkar14492 жыл бұрын
It’s very common in India 🇮🇳 to using solar water heaters since atleast about last 20 yrs…this s true for urban as well as rural areas…residential as well as commercial applications… Surprised how it’s not known in South Africa 🇿🇦…
@oqkdsi2 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps in winter = headaches for humans
@Fellowtellurian2 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps do not wok with hydronic hot water boiler system. We need heat pumps designed to replace boilers, not the entire radio system. Forced air is not efficient, hot water is better.
@bobshakor81842 жыл бұрын
Central ground heat pumps alongside seasonal energy storage system for several building blocks could provide an efficient and reliable solution to fossil fuel dependency for heating and cooling. "Underground Liquid air battery" system could be employed for seasonal energy storage capacity.
@forbaldo12 жыл бұрын
tell him he's dreaming , where do you get the electricity to charge the only 50% efficient battery it's hardly better than a compressed air motor
@sarcasmo572 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't need so many new conversions if we had fewer people.
@rikulappi96642 жыл бұрын
Here in Finland insulation is king! Heat pumps are popular, electricity is nuclear/wind/water windows are triple. Inslution cuts the PEAK consumption especially!
@rinoplastidoktor2 жыл бұрын
Nuclear
@oscarcrespo56602 жыл бұрын
Interesting that biomass is barely mentioned taking into consideration it has a larger use than all the other alternatives combined.
@alankwellsmsmba2 жыл бұрын
biomass is high carbon wood heat. It's magical thinking
@DouglasQuattrochi2 жыл бұрын
Wrong: "This historic disaster [the Hindenburg] hung over public attitudes toward hydrogen use for decades even though it wasn't the gas that caused the explosion.". Quoting Wikipedia, "A variety of hypotheses have been put forward for both the cause of ignition and the initial fuel for the ensuing fire." The fact remains we don't know, but hydrogen is more explosive than petrol. One of the hypotheses is that simple static electricity blew it up. That makes the Economist sound like a shill for the H2 industry, saying it definitely wasn't the gas. It easily could have been.
@ChadSimplicio2 жыл бұрын
Sadly, by the time such green methods can be made global & cheap, humanity will be on the brink of extinction.
@Rnankn2 жыл бұрын
Well how long do you think it will take? Months, years, decades? Extinction is a long way off, surely? It’s better to just turn off the fossil fuels and rough it for a few years than go extinct. Or even to stop with selling all the useless junk and make heat pumps instead, how long can it really take if that was actually a goal, not just whimsically hoping people will watch a youtube video and get around to it eventually….
@forbaldo12 жыл бұрын
@@Rnankn you don't believe that the climate is changing otherwise you would have done this already
@richdobbs65952 жыл бұрын
They won't ever be cheap. They will just be less expensive than the alternatives. The current methods will go away either because of government fiat or carbon taxes.
2 жыл бұрын
Wait, what? A heat pump collects heat from the outside and transfers it into the house? But what if it’s much colder outside?
@dsmyify2 жыл бұрын
Do you want a visit from the thought police, because that's how you get a visit from the thought police.
2 жыл бұрын
@@dsmyify Ease up on the drugs. I think they’re making you paranoid.
@dsmyify2 жыл бұрын
@ ~ did you like your own comment?
2 жыл бұрын
@@dsmyify % no
@shouldb.studying46702 жыл бұрын
See technology connections video on how they work but basically you use a fluid that boils at a very low temperature coupled with a compressor
@jorgepancorvol2 жыл бұрын
Great video Economist team! like always excellent!
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
all manipulation and lies
@kenhunt51532 жыл бұрын
I know Italia just extended their Ecobonus program for building energy efficiency. I wonder how that is working?
@francisrobindaine-duchesne60952 жыл бұрын
You guys seem to really have no clue on how to live without fossil fuels. I live in Quebec, it snows and it's below 0 Celsius 4-5 months of the year. Most people heat with electricity. The electric company is owned by the State, makes profit that is given back to the State to fund healthcare among other programs. 96% of the electricity is from hydroelectric dams and the remaining 4% is from solar panels and wind turbines. We have the cheapest electricity in North America, the electric bills didn't increase in the last two years and it will increase by 2,6% on April 1st and that will be it for 2022. That's how it is when you're energy independent and that you don't rely on markets to buy energy from. We're 8,5 million people in the province and we even sell our surplus to New York.
@edgarjohnston79372 жыл бұрын
Answers fron various races: 50% Indians ➡️ Do yoga Chinese ➡️ Do Taizhi Americans ➡️ hug your neighbor's wife British follow Americans Australian ➡️ follow Americans Japanese follow Americans The other 50% Indians follow Americans
@abelardogreen2 жыл бұрын
Seal the envelope. That's more important than insulation. The movement of air trumps insolation.
@seandobson4992 жыл бұрын
Energy costs in the UK are about to increase by over £600 per year with a further similar increase in the Autumn and further increases likely for at least the next few years, millions of households in the UK will soon no longer be able to afford to heat their homes or run electric appliances and this will lead to increased deaths from hypothermia, homes becoming damp and mouldy with increased illnesses and people will demand far higher pay increases just to stand still as food, petrol, train fares and just about everything else is increasing in price. I can see riots and demonstrations like those never seen before not so far off as workers simply can no longer make ends meet, pensioners especially as the pension increase in April is only going to be about 3% and 3% on the state pension is peanuts and comes nowhere near to covering the huge energy price increases with similar increases in the Autumn, rapidly rising food, clothing and petrol increases, along with just about everything else that only fuel further increases. The energy companies in the UK are going to end up being owed hundreds of millions of pounds as a lot of households will run up huge energy bills rather than sit in coats and jumpers in semi darkness in a bitterly cold house and any government that allows them to cut off huge numbers of people because of unaffordable energy bills, which would take them years to pay back at the same time as energy bills become more and more unaffordable for ever-increasing numbers of people is going to face huge social unrest, which is probably why the French Government made EDF shoulder the brunt of energy price increases, the French consumer only having to pay a 12% increase in gas prices and 4% in electricity prices. I can honestly say that I am glad that I am close to my three score and ten rather than being in my twenties because I will not be around to see what will come in the near future.
@earlystrings12 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps, insulation, personal solar are all excellent measures but human society depends on reliable electric base load available at all times. Wind and solar don’t come close to providing this now and may never do so. The only non fossil option is nuclear but it seems the people most concerned about climate change are also the ones most opposed to nuclear power. The country that will face this dilemma first is Germany, as it is dismantling both fossil and nuclear plants while having no real alternative in the works. It will be interesting to see how they fare.
@treefarm32882 жыл бұрын
I disagree. I live in the Tropics and as with many others in the country, have had only solar for electric power for 30 years. Batteries do wear out but if cared for can last 7 years for me. The lead is 95% recycled in Australia. If I were nearer the coast or in the uplands wind would be an option. Many farmers in eastern Australia also have mini-hydro schemes, they come in all sizes I have seen some very rudely made which lasted decades. You can also save energy needed to provide water with gravity schemes (I have that 2 km long with 18 branch lines.)
@earlystrings12 жыл бұрын
@@treefarm3288 your tropical location is optional for a small personal carbon footprint. Nations much further north with cold, dark winters have very different energy needs. But even your location doubtless depends on industries with high power requirements, even if they are physically far away.
@luistiago51212 жыл бұрын
Right...heat pumps...so were does it comes the eletricity to power the device?
@jezalb27102 жыл бұрын
You have a point. But most importantly buildings should be well insulated.
@frankreynolds99302 жыл бұрын
Less energy required than conventional heating.
@treefarm32882 жыл бұрын
What about cooking? You showed a burner.
@bozoldier2 жыл бұрын
80%? Over what period of time? Deos it includes the giant carbon cost of the tranfor / installation / mining / wars necessary to build the heat pumps/windows/ i sualtion and install them? As well as the cost of responsibly disposing of the waste produced by the overall. If not. Let's call it what it is: green washing.
@RelaxingSounds-ev6zz2 жыл бұрын
Carbon isn’t causing warming. Pointing the finger at something this small is ridiculous.
@maryl2342 жыл бұрын
If it wasn't weather + hydrogen gas, then what brought the Hindenberg down?
@andreylucass2 жыл бұрын
How? *Nuclear.*
@rafaelvilas42302 жыл бұрын
Industries have to pay for the renovation of the energy plan
@johanponken2 жыл бұрын
Energy is not just Watts and Amperes, production and consumption. A system-wide analysis, even in a short, should be mentioned.
@nathanngumi84672 жыл бұрын
Very interesting!
@elliottblaauw45752 жыл бұрын
well done insulate britain for pointing out we need to insulate before installing heat pumps
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
hilarious
@ДенисДементьев-т3о2 жыл бұрын
Caring about global warm, when the society is so unequal is ridiculous. How many days you should keep your house unheated to compensate one private jet flight from London to Dubai 😀
@juliancoulden17532 жыл бұрын
Perhaps we should stop putting in air conditioning into schools, open windows instead? And heats pumps don’t respond to cold spikes. With traditional central heating, you just up the thermostat. You can’t do this with a heat pump. Back ground heat is insufficient. So many of the other options have significant restrictions, these aren’t discussed here. Why should people voluntarily give up these comforts, without certainty that they can continue to keep warm.
@forbaldo12 жыл бұрын
the manufacturer determines the output temperature of the heat pump not the external heat you are all talk put your actions where the all mouth is
@juliancoulden17532 жыл бұрын
@@forbaldo1 well that doesn’t help me on a bitterly cold day. I want to be in control
@ariannarp68662 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂 stop believing the lies!!!!
@cmk3532 жыл бұрын
What about district heating and Geo thermal ? Why is it always about having a commodity that they can eventually tax Hydrogen? It should be kept for heavy industry!
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
towns and cities are heavy industry
@cmk3532 жыл бұрын
@@richardcowley4087 concrete and construction yes
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
@@cmk353 you havent got a clue
@pjacobsen10002 жыл бұрын
You can move to Thailand, Kenya or Nicaragua. No need for heating there.
@MotoTvWoodsFarm2 жыл бұрын
interesting
@dlewis84052 жыл бұрын
Clean, reliable nuclear power. Keep the existing plants online with subsidies and start deploying new plants with the newer technologies being developed.
@inter3071002 жыл бұрын
I love co2.
@Cr4y7-AegisInquisitor2 жыл бұрын
So why is power failing in South Africa?
@01ai012 жыл бұрын
Power generation infrastructure investments not keeping pace with substantial population growth.
@hopeforbetter3822 жыл бұрын
What does The Economist think about their own PM?
@jberto88782 жыл бұрын
Rubish, as usual
@Lildizzle4202 жыл бұрын
me watching this video from phoenix Arizona where our tap water comes out hot lol
@maryl2342 жыл бұрын
and you don't need your oven for baking chocolate chip cookies in the summer. I lived in Phoenix for 2 years and it was brutal. Happy to be back in the Northeast where I can get out in the winter if dressed appropriately.
@nakkiewildvangst26562 жыл бұрын
nobody talking about the very clean ....nuclear power???
@mack-uv6gn2 жыл бұрын
One could hope
@rogeradamz2 жыл бұрын
Tks guys another greenwashing report! Poor very poor!
@EsaMononen2 жыл бұрын
Points: 1) You can tell when the journalist does not have a STEM background. 2) the man is willing to spend on cars but insulated windows are too expensive?
@Vinladen75312 жыл бұрын
Did it say 30 million houses in Britain aren't suitable for heat pump? Or 13? There's only 25 million houses, and I have a heat pump.
@vylbird80142 жыл бұрын
Heat pumps are difficult to retrofit. They are great if they are built with the property, but there are a lot of practical issues converting gas to heat pump. Even the pipes need to be replaced, and that usually means breaking the walls open. By the time you're done the whole property needs redecorating just to fix the damage done fitting the pump. It's water temperature. Gas heating moves a small volume of hot water, while heat pumps move a large volume of warm water. The total heat transferred can be the same, but moving more water means you need wider pipes and double-panel radiators.
@Vinladen75312 жыл бұрын
@@vylbird8014 I had my house retrofitted from a gas boiler to an air source heat pump they didn't need to break open my walls they fed all the pipes under the upstairs floor, there are large diameter pipes that come up the front of the house from the external unit and go under the floor to the hot water tank, most of the radiator pipes were kept, 15mm copper, they replaced the radiators, was not much more disruption than having a new gas system fitted.
@vylbird80142 жыл бұрын
@@Vinladen7531 Then you had a house that was not too much trouble. Not all are so easy.
@Salty34392 жыл бұрын
Interesting 🤔
@alphonsobutlakiv7892 жыл бұрын
I feel like we're missing something, I don't think it's carbon alone here, I think the heat escaping off our homes is far bigger in climate change than we realize. Bodies of water hold heat and affect whether with it, and cities is say release far more take most lakes we know do this. I guess hard to say how much it matters until you see what it's like to see it stay unheated a year.
@ImaskarDono2 жыл бұрын
Intuitively it looks like a problem, but no, it's not. CO2 traps heat for centuries, while your home heat just dissipates quickly.
@alphonsobutlakiv7892 жыл бұрын
@@ImaskarDono the heat from homes doesn't last long, but it is constantly generated for nearly half a year every year. The heat escape also represents a lot of wasted energy. What we build on the ground and heating that might affect the wind that moves weather too. It must to some amount.
@ImaskarDono2 жыл бұрын
@@alphonsobutlakiv789 yes, it was calculated and it is very small. The damage from CO2 from generating this heat is orders of magnitude bigger than from that heat escaping. That also means that of course we should insulate as much as possible.
@85therealdeal2 жыл бұрын
Heat pump = Air conditioning on reverse cycle. No need for a new name for it.
@macgp442 жыл бұрын
So... The Economist presents us with ways INDIVIDUALS can reduce their carbon footprint. But this approach will never get us anywhere near solving the problem, and the editors at The Economist know it. What WOULD work is citizens taking power away from the big businesses that create the CO2 by voting OUT of power the current politicians that serve corporate interests. The Economist doesn't want you to think about that.
@henrysevern2 жыл бұрын
Not a bad video, but without nuclear power you will never be able to produce enough green hydrogen for everybody. For heat pumps to work you will need well insulated houses and won’t be able to open the windows, as it takes a lot longer for the house to heat up again.
@ariannarp68662 жыл бұрын
Dislike 👎
@TheDoomWizard2 жыл бұрын
We'll hit 1.5C by 2030. Game over.
@marnevoile31122 жыл бұрын
Boiler in Johannesburg?
@meejinhuang2 жыл бұрын
People living in cold or hot climates have higher energy requirements. In the future there will be more people living in milder climates because of high energy costs.
@richdobbs65952 жыл бұрын
Getting people to move is about the most expensive thing you can do. Adam Smith noted this more than 200 years ago. Nuclear power will be cheaper than getting people to move away from where jobs are. Getting jobs to move based on reducing energy requirements is unlikely to happen. Energy is just too cheap for that to happen.
@monkeyman3212 жыл бұрын
By wearing tick clothes? Am I too tropical to understand this?
@forbaldo12 жыл бұрын
yes you are the water will freeze in the pipes inside the walls. Then burst
@diyorzaripbayev74782 жыл бұрын
How to stay warm without using Russian gas?
@MrFoxMinecraft2 жыл бұрын
Way is this always the public's problem. The main problems the rich and super rich
@JakeandAnnie2 жыл бұрын
Nuclear power and electric coil induction furnace's.
@stevegreen28392 жыл бұрын
So you say hydrogen was not the cause of the Hinderburg disaster, what was it then, an exploding sea gull. ?
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
Provide examples of "green energy" ?
@jasons98792 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! Great work on bringing all this info and options to the average person.
@jpablo7002 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't mind having a few ladies lay next to me to keep me "warm"
@jackpreacher40442 жыл бұрын
Can we please start having intelligent conversations about the matter of being responsible, sustainable, citizens of God's green earth?
@richardcowley40872 жыл бұрын
hilarious
@christianthomsen67012 жыл бұрын
Nuclear produce heat too
@markknoop62832 жыл бұрын
We just need to hookup our solarpanels to a electrolyzer and the hydrogen wil start flowing. Than change the natural gas heater to hydrogen heater.
@angryzombie33162 жыл бұрын
Rich people problems
@michalziobro78902 жыл бұрын
We should have two houses in the EU winter and summer. Winter in sweden and summer in grece