Equilibrium Made Easy: How to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems

[@Exemplary832]

Nonsense

[@cryingbananajo]

So chemistry is nonsense to you?

[@AdyI.R]

Hahhahaha

[@ssiqtv]

the fact that this was pinned, lol

[@varietyplustv906]

Why would you say something like that 😑😡 Don't you know that s is someone's hard work😡

[@khushisoam8068]

I never knew that I could learn the topic of 5 hrs in 12 mins ! TYSM

[@lyra331]

hi! I am dyscauculic with ADHD and I've been for like, 3 years without understanding chemistry trying my hardest, usually I don't watch youtube classes cause they don't make any difference, I normally don't understand, but WOW for the first time i got something, like, in my life. I even cried a little. thank you so much, you're a hero professor!

[@ketzbook]

glad to help!

[@schneiderwanjia3433]

Wooow

[@Mhwdi-2]

N1gga why'd you cry? Thats so cringe 😬😂

[@obama8573]

The one who made this video is a legend 💯

[@damtewbogale6794]

The most comprehensive video about chemical equilibrium on YT

[@rationalism_communism]

I was very confused but after watching lots of videos and the same scenarios come up, I leaned quadratic equations and now I get it. It took a week.

[@brianottenbreit871]

I see below that someone pointed out that deriving the rate of the forward and backward reactions cannot be done by looking at the coefficients., but rather must be experimentally determined. The equilibrium constant can, however, be found by the coefficients. Kr and Keq are fundamentally different as can be seen if you do the work to find the units.

[@jeremiakasinda7695]

Thank you allot, this will really help tomorrow in my Chemistry 1A exam.

[@taurus7261]

I have a question regarding the last problem. Why is that the reactant gained the +2x as its change in molarity when the whole reaction is product favored based on the value of Kc?

[@home-sauce]

this is pretty important for the AP chem test

[@chandrashekarhb9349]

Excellent and nicely explained. You are a good teacher.

[@ketzbook]

Glad it was helpful!

[@Nicole-tb6iw]

thank you so much, it's brief and easily understood

[@luke5385]

this is so high quality and well explained. ty!

[@katherinelee2690]

literally thank u so much, this was so helpful

[@saikumar.d7101]

Thank u sir ur video is too good Please make up like this cideos

[@albertlonga6995]

I am enjoying , bcoz of what you are explaining it is easy to understand , thank you!

[@meebee5189]

Sorry Im a little confused at 3:10 how did u derive the rate equation for the Haber process from the stoichiometric ratios? I see how you are trying to derive K from the rate constants but... the order of a reaction is not equivalent to the coefficients from the equation.

[@ketzbook]

most often the rate law can be taken from the coefficients of the balanced equation, although you are correct that there are many exceptions to that, and you need to do kinetic studies to determine it. However, I did not intend to go through exceptions in a video that focuses on the basics. Equilibrium is intricately tied to kinetics. One may incorrectly think, for example, that the equilibrium expression of an Sn1 reaction is different from that of an Sn2 reaction; however, both reactions include the activity of the nucleophile in the equilibrium expression because the true full rate law of an Sn1 reaction actually includes the nucleophile and the leaving group. That is just one exception.

[@Anime_world_india78]

Can you please make a video about physics Topic: simple harmonic oscillation (S.H.O)

[@YinhlaHolenii]

Do more on chemical equlibrium and titration(acid and bases)

[@BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry]

For the last question, why wasn't the moles(0.95) changed into molar concentration by dividing by 10L?

[@ketzbook]

it is a 1.0 L container, not 10 L. If it were 10 L, we should divide by 10.

[@lillymaewilcox31]

Thank you so much, you're a life saver

[@ketzbook]

You're welcome!

[@respectanyone117]

After struggling so much I finally found this video

[@kishamuringani9331]

can you please make a video mainly on examples of questions on equillibrium

[@ama27-e2u]

Hi!I am chiamaka pls how did u get the value of x as 0.2 I means what was the quadratic equation you used to have the value of x.Thanks

[@taranjotkaur4831]

plz make a video on organic chemistry

[@ketzbook]

what specifically? OChem is a very big topic.

[@taranjotkaur4831]

@@ketzbook electrophillic nd nucleophillic subsitution reactions

[@bettan369]

amazing explanation. thank you!

[@KelvinMichembo]

Why dividing the conc of NO2 BY N2O4 instead of other way round since NO2 a product not a reactant in example 2???

[@نغمة-ظ9س]

Can you please make a video on hydrogen and proton nmr spectrum

[@Anime_world_india78]

Are you from which Country?

[@pinkflower88]

7:45 can somebody explain what he just did here, why 0.88÷5, please explain

[@rishmakumar3644]

He did this to get it into the concentration, i.e. [concentration (M or mol/L) = moles (mol)/volume (L)], since Kc is measured using the concentrations of each reactant and product. If he did not divide 0.88mol/5L to get 0.176mol/L then he would've only had the moles. He also converted the moles of CCl4 to concentration in the beginning too. Sorry if my explanation is a bit all over the place. Hope this helps

[@anni2165]

Good & helpful explain👍 This video help me a lot to understand this subtopic more Thank you

[@rosemin1973]

hey..with the last question i don't get why we had -x and not +x

[@moengpasela773]

how did u calculate initial molarity and equilibrium molarity

[@ketzbook]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gX3NiJRvmKplq80

[@BoonkiCoC14]

Jeez, did i just understand this? Yes i did, sir. Thanks a lot, my book has spent around 20 pages talking about this but it makes no fucking sense. Thank you!!!!

[@makaylahawkins9702]

How do you get those initial molarities

[@nnk2874]

I feel like you confused the molarity of CCl4 to be .176 when in fact in appears to be the value we used to plug into X. CCl4 should be .024 molarity. Therefore, in the fraction where you have Kc = (2(.024))^2 / .176 ---> .176 should instead be .024.

[@ketzbook]

nope, 0.176 comes right from the data in the question. It is correct.

[@rassimsimou1594]

Good

[@andreazuliani7004]

I am finding this way more complicate than how explained in my class.. I don't understand all the x and those extra calculations here

[@Remember_e]

The equilibrium concentration of CCl4 must be 0.024 moles.

[@hunnidasiago746]

Surprisingly...my lecturer watches your videos...uses ur concepts...and your questions too😂...I'm getting my fees back

[@nt-qb5pb]

we want more and more videos

[@atanursaparbaev9691]

Thanks very much!!!!

[@janetnkrumah542]

Thanks a lot sir

[@ketzbook]

you're welcome!

[@chandrasai1990]

thanks from India class 11 preparation for jee mains

[@vickysilver8509]

Thanks

[@ketzbook]

you're welcome!

[@RebelRelatives]

Gimme the I30N thee 8 GTI/R Killer But how can u start 5:04 😂😂😂😂 and im with you 600K for a Hatchback 5:54 yooo😂😂😂😂 i rather get an old RS3 or old A45 with +/- 150k km

[@chamasayasianjina2081]

Where is the 0.024 coming from??

[@jishakjishak4698]

Thanks for such a fine class

[@anwarvictor9448]

great!!!!

[@pynthymmailangdkhar1403]

Is this for class 12?

[@geralddemafilez4926]

i think you forgot to square the molarity of NO2

[@rajatdas5500]

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@feifeiiii]

9:18

[@AfadapaDarlene]

Pls I understand nothing

[@joy_meme]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@aurangzaibkhan543]

You are great but 2.8+4.4=6.12and you say that it is 2+2+1.6=5.6

[@joy_meme]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

[@cathystacy9810]

Cleveland clinic

[@thepelicanman7436]

I f*cking hate physics sometimes

[@janetnkrumah542]

Thanks a lot sir

[@ketzbook]

Most welcome

[@schneiderwanjia3433]

Thanks