i = rotation by 90 deg. i x i = rotation by 180 deg. i x i x i = rotation by 270 deg. Complex numbers are used to indicate rotation. Hope this helps. Binnoy Visualizing Maths A book beyond formulas Dedicated to you and all such similar minds searching for answers.
@atefrod6804 жыл бұрын
I discoverd this myself when I was struggling what i^23 for example is. Just divide it by 4 and use the last decimales to.determing what it should be. Here that would be 0,75, which means i^3 and that is -i
@thomasolson74478 жыл бұрын
Want an algebraic vector to play with? [(x-1)/(x+3), (x+2-i*x)/(x+3), (x+2+i*x)/(x+3)] The distance is 1.
@HellaPerformance12 жыл бұрын
No because if you think about the Pythagorean Theorem: c^2 = a^2 + b^2 Well, we are looking for the magnitude of the complex number, or in other words it's radius. r^2 = a^2 + b^2 Therefore r = Sqrt( a^2 + b^2 ) or |z| = Sqrt( a^2 + b^2 ) |z| = Sqrt( 3/4 + 1/4 )
@Krabby_Patty14 жыл бұрын
I dont know how to put this, but the timing of this video is *spot* on, just before my terminal exams. Thanks!
@HellaPerformance12 жыл бұрын
Sqrt( 1 ) = + or - 1.. The reason he chooses one in this scenario though is because he is looking for the length of the modulus. As Klatjofsky put it, lengths are always positive.
@patrickoneillnl19662 жыл бұрын
I have watched several of your videos, several of your videos and they are wonderful, they are wonderful.
@mouadovic0413 жыл бұрын
this is so easy ,we want real analysis complex
@Motivationtosuccess-qs7ih2 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir, now I'm ready for my quiz on complex numbers 💯
@anonymousL25111 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I don't know how many times you've heard this but you've seriously helped us. :D
@Visualizingmathandphysics12 жыл бұрын
Complex numbers indicate rotation. In maths, the number '1' indicates 'as it is' The number 'i' indicates 'rotated by 90 deg' The number '-1' indicates 'rotated by 180 deg'. The number '-i' indicates 'rotated by 270 deg'. Binnoy Visualizing maths A book beyond formulas Dedicated to you and such similar minds searching for answers.
@jackfaggie94779 жыл бұрын
basic complex
@debajyotibhattacharjee31806 жыл бұрын
You are great SIR. Thank you for your online lesson.
@salaheamean11 жыл бұрын
what an amazing video. really helped me a lot thank you and as a muslim May Allah guide you to his way. :P
@fahmylina12311 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation of the complex number. Thank you, indeed.
@Klatjofsky12 жыл бұрын
Yes, but remember that he's trying to figure out the length of the position vector and lengths are always positive :)
@thetempest06 жыл бұрын
at 10:07, why did you square the denominator from 2 to 4?
@MrYounis2610 жыл бұрын
Just to be in the safe side, this is done in Argand diagram right?
@Visualizingmathandphysics12 жыл бұрын
Yes, you are right, complex numbers indicated 'rotation". The comments above might help you. Binnoy Visualizing maths A book beyond formulas. Dedicated to you and such similar minds searching for answers
@Mrbenz-dr8zu7 жыл бұрын
complex thing simply done
@visiting3113 жыл бұрын
i thought i^2 was -1? or are you taking the absolute value of it cause of the distance thing
@genarovillarin88103 жыл бұрын
9 years late and got stuck on this too but I think I figured it out. We're only gonna take the real part when solving for the magnitude
@basia23308 ай бұрын
@@genarovillarin8810 Yes, Khan is calculating the magnitude by square rooting the squares of the real parts (a and b). The coefficient of i is b, and is the component used in the magnitude formula.
@koushikghosh4654 жыл бұрын
Please start a series on COMPLEX ANALYSIS.
@FreeMarketSwine2 жыл бұрын
What exactly is happening when e is raised to the power of an imaginary number?
@missAyzl13 жыл бұрын
thanks so much for this video~!!! nice visual presentation and made a lot of things clearer :D
@pri79749 жыл бұрын
This helped me a lot.Thank you so much!!
@Aurelien413112 жыл бұрын
Really good video, this was my first introduction to the complex analysis and it makes me want to learn a lot more about it =)
@disgracedmilo2 жыл бұрын
Still learning about complex numbers?
@einsteinino14 жыл бұрын
@alawrence89 I understand your reasons. In fact, a long time ago I put to myself the same question. Well, it looks like the expression "imaginary part" WAS used to denote bi, so being consistent with the word "imaginary"; later on, the i was dropped - maybe with the axiomatization of complex numbers as the set R² of ordered pairs (a, b) of real numbers? - thus leaving with just the coefficient of the "imaginary number" - that's correct, instead - bi.
@burnsyy911912 жыл бұрын
I'm just learning this but i'm sure it has it's uses.Like a kid counting stones wouldn't have any use for fractions,or someone measuring the length of something won't have any use for negative numbers.At our level we probably won't know of any application for imaginary numbers but later we will.
@sirfalcon112 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sal, one would think this would have been covered in math classes at some point before partial differential equations.
@Seedofwinter12 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your response. I will be sure to check your channel out.
@ultratribalist13 жыл бұрын
@goldstein23 i is not squared but the coefficient of i is squared.in the first example which he deleted,the coefficient is 1 and in the next example the coefficient is 1/2.hope that helps.
@aakashkarajgikar39353 жыл бұрын
9:00 , 10:10 Wait, but I thought you can't distribute a square root to terms inside the radical when separated by addition or subtraction. What happened to that?
@All-Videos4 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir! Could you please find the absolute value of this complex number: √3- √(2i )
@Rararari13 жыл бұрын
thank youuu
@ekoi19959 жыл бұрын
this can be applied in adding 2d vectors :)
@thabsor4 жыл бұрын
why is a video of precalculus referencing a calculus video for complete understanding?
@HotPepperLala13 жыл бұрын
Basic Complex Analysis...? Will you do the advanced ones?
@ToNmAnAyO12 жыл бұрын
Argand Diagram Argand Diagram Argand Diagram
@gauripradhan85109 жыл бұрын
Thank you !
@sebzim450013 жыл бұрын
At 10:21 shouldn't that be - 1/4?
@Menegoth14 жыл бұрын
This is so complex!
@MiladD2511 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Visualizingmathandphysics11 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is due to some reason counterclockwise. Binnoy Visualizing Maths Amazon
@hoaque09211 жыл бұрын
it's very useful. thank you.^^
@michaeldenero17288 жыл бұрын
how did i power 2 become a positive number instead of a negative number
@MrDhanesh2nair8 жыл бұрын
Yes how did that happen. Square of i is -1.
@ElizaberthUndEugen8 жыл бұрын
yes, it is an error.
@jphare19586 жыл бұрын
No, it is not an error. You don't square the I. You only square the 1. We are trying to find the magnitude, and the value in the I plane is 1. The I is only there to indicate which part of the complex number is being defined.
@davidcossa79706 жыл бұрын
(i^2)=-1 not i=-1
@axemurdererrl12 жыл бұрын
thanks so much, im taking a n extension course at uni where they assume u know this (idon;t XD) :( very clear much appreciated.
@experthe957414 жыл бұрын
just a correction, Euler is pronounced like "Oiler"
@norwayte14 жыл бұрын
Good. Keep on going.
@isabellenicholls65288 жыл бұрын
Phi is not necessarily the arctan of b/a if the tan of phi equals b/a...
@haveuseenme39908 жыл бұрын
argand*
@zoranhacker6 жыл бұрын
How come?
@einsteinino14 жыл бұрын
@alawrence89 Nope, sorry. You are wrong. The "imaginary part of a complex number" is the real coefficient multiplying the imaginary unit i.
@harrytuttle77713 жыл бұрын
This lecture should be labeled Complex Analysis for USAians. See Eurpopeans already know everything about all things. Only USAians (or Americans as we are sometimes misidentified) are ignorant about complex analysis. The only thing we could ever analyze are Big Macs and Cheeseburgers.
@goldstein2313 жыл бұрын
Did Sal forget the negative signs when squaring i around 9:00 and 10:10? If he didn't then i'm quite confused.
@erezklein57696 ай бұрын
Are negative numbers real numbers? And yes, by the diagram shown only 1/4 of the area is used. Replaying 13 years later.
@einsteinino14 жыл бұрын
Another correction: the imaginary part of a complex number is just b, not bi.
@Aranda-frtn13 жыл бұрын
muahhhhhhh Te AMO rrrrrready for my test,
@isaacsechslingloff80082 жыл бұрын
In the precalculus class you did not introduce these taylor series or "e" in terms of sin and cos yet.
@nora_80806 жыл бұрын
in the formula z=a+bi, can b=0 and if so, don't we gain a real number?
@dannyboy1235714 жыл бұрын
@experthe i heard it pronounced either way, i like the Youler pronounciation my self
@Ynno23 жыл бұрын
lol are we supposed to have watched the calculus playlist before watching the precalculus playlist?
@creatorsense26749 жыл бұрын
why are u in versing the tan in 4:51
@xloserlove12312 жыл бұрын
remember this is all counterclockwise
@Vlaxirious13 жыл бұрын
sorry i have a question how cos something + i sin something related to exponential form?
@ridium77217 жыл бұрын
until now I thought a, b is in R (real number line)
@vsenderov12 жыл бұрын
What software does he use to prepare the videos?
@s.aslahahmadfaizi46878 жыл бұрын
Can you please teach me how to write like that with mouse.
@itsklol8 жыл бұрын
He probably uses a tablet
@k333r6 жыл бұрын
It's a drawing tablet...
@shoyoishida59014 жыл бұрын
How did the sqrt of 3/2 became 3/4?
@ABeardedDad13 жыл бұрын
if we didn't have 'e' the universe would implode.
@SegaFanClub13 жыл бұрын
@Menegoth You're just imagining it
@Adinzo95Studios12 жыл бұрын
Isnt the square root of 1, +1 or -1? Either way though, thanks
@arvetis2 жыл бұрын
yooler
@Jenae-yb3mv4 жыл бұрын
how have i watched this 4 times and still don't understand. Welp ig the perks of dyslexia and Dyscalculia yayyyyy :0
@ahappyimago3 жыл бұрын
What part don’t you get
@lionnick18495 жыл бұрын
What is e here ? Is it equal to 2.71 ? Or is it another thing ? Who can tell it me
@Dadarkxy12 жыл бұрын
No, that's YOU... (Do you just know what a "FUNCTION" is ??)
@shinfu81908 жыл бұрын
Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullah. Sir Khan I didn't get the part how u converted under root 3/2 to 3/4 . plz guide me to a video of yours so I can revise this
@LizDcruzzie8 жыл бұрын
he squared it. He used Pythagorus theorem to get the modulus of Z
@shinfu81908 жыл бұрын
+LizDcruzzie thank uuuuuuuu😊
@ilyxb0013 жыл бұрын
My teacher told me to watch this guy. lol
@soludsnak11 жыл бұрын
0:00
@P0PH0USE13 жыл бұрын
"Yooler" is like fingernails on a blackboard for a mathematician.
@ahappyimago3 жыл бұрын
It’s pronounced YOU-ler
@rbmarik60825 жыл бұрын
Ok so can anyone tell me what exactly is an argument of a complex number... I know how to find the argument and these stuffs BUT WHAT EXACTLY IS AN ARGUMENT?? Why is range always -pi to pi??
@AriaHarmony5 жыл бұрын
Draw a line from the origin (0,0) to the complex number (ie, x+yi), the **angle** between the positive real axis and that line is what we call the argument of x+yi. Note: the argument is the angle θ theta itself and not a function of it like cos(θ)/sin(θ)/etc. The range -pi to pi is called the principal argument, technically you can keep rotating full circle and get infinitely many angles to represent the same complex number and they will all be correct. According to Wikipedia we restrict it like that when "a well-defined function is required" and "Some authors define the range of the principal value as being in the closed-open interval [0, 2π)". So looks like -pi to pi is just the common convention.
@ghilmandilshad94952 жыл бұрын
a small stupid question why we are not considering the ' i ' with the value of b in a.square + b.square
@experthe957414 жыл бұрын
@viewer280 I see that I made a mistake by using my other account to comment on this... but I assure you I'm the same person you sent the other comment to.
@Pr0x1mo13 жыл бұрын
What i don't get is why someone thought of to initially raise the entire thing by e?
@0726-o9b5 жыл бұрын
I can't believe Salman Khan pronounced Euler as "Yuu ler"
@VndNvwYvvSvv5 жыл бұрын
He isn't really that good, especially when he repeats himself.. he repeats himself.. repeeeats.. him... self... seeellllf... repeats himself like this.. like... like this... thisssss.
@jamesleem.d.74424 жыл бұрын
(1/2 i) when squared gives (1/4 i squared) or MINUS 1/4 not 1/4 as you showed inside the square root sign
@jamesleem.d.74424 жыл бұрын
I retract my comment. I got it now: Our b value (2) is all that is squared here
@ibbyizaG12 жыл бұрын
can't have a negative modulus.
@Visualizingmathandphysics12 жыл бұрын
Just as there is east, north , west and south. In maths ,there is 1, i,-1 and -i. I have some videos over it on my channel. Binnoy Visualizing Maths A book beyond formulas, dedicated to you and all such similar minds searching for answers.
@supertren13 жыл бұрын
@3809ault Perhaps you could do some videos like that, and put it together free in Internet without repeat yourself!.
@HellaPerformance12 жыл бұрын
Because you're the one with the misunderstanding, not him.
@Seedofwinter12 жыл бұрын
I don't understand the point of complex numbers. I wish some folks could describe some applications.
@yuvraj72146 жыл бұрын
Mark Taronji Its been 5 years, but still if this helps someone else...why did you learn real numbers, because you liked to know about it right?? That's the point of math, you just make up something a d work on that. Also there are many applications...some examples are transformation and quantum physics.
@sayardutta15256 жыл бұрын
they have applications in electrical and electronics and comm. engineering extensively too, since im from that field
@I77AGIC11 жыл бұрын
excellent video! just try to stop repeating yourself repeating yourself so much
@richardaversa71288 жыл бұрын
I77AGIC that's actually how Khan is so successful, people being introduced to a complex topic for the first time tend to not really notice the repetition - it is require for effective e learning, and fills in the holes of what they muss while they are thinking and processing the new information.
@flawns12 жыл бұрын
lol basic complex analysis. ... like saying this is simple hard math
@GetUpAndWatchVideos8 жыл бұрын
The views to like Ratio....LOL
@kevinclaypool63453 жыл бұрын
I hated this lesson because nowhere do you teach how to use identities to solve where the radian or degree lies on the quadrants. "Using the identity 'tan(x+-theta)' , we know that the following is also a solution of the equation." That quote tells me nothing, regarding how to choose which identity to use.
@Futacy11 жыл бұрын
My brain hurts.
@Luxcium7 жыл бұрын
Futacy yeah I know because he said i^2 = 1 instead of -1
@richardaversa71288 жыл бұрын
oh god, Sal please tell me you're not pronouncing the great mathematician "yooler"...
@thiebes11 жыл бұрын
Please stop mispronouncing Euler so I don't end up throwing a rock through my monitor.
@SlyMaelstrom10 жыл бұрын
Avernus Inferno I don't know what the problem is... he posed a pretty simple statement. The commentator is pronouncing Euler as YOU-LER when it is, in fact, pronounced OI-LER.
@janvermaak8710 жыл бұрын
I will now mispronounce Euler in your memory from this day forward just to spite you English-elitist jackoffs.
@SlyMaelstrom10 жыл бұрын
Yatsi Kaamrev Pronunciation is so elitist.
@TwistyTrav7 жыл бұрын
Stop turning a Math problem into an English problem. Lol
@SirHiggalot6 жыл бұрын
But Euler is not even an English name.
@Ghaiyst13 жыл бұрын
ah! now I understand why they taught us that graph in algebra 2 trig, even though im in calculus 2 now. God its important.
@Ghaiyst13 жыл бұрын
so 1=e^itheta where ln1=i(pie/6) and 0=i(pie/6) in which case i is the square root of negative 1, 0 or hiding beyond logic's sense? yea I can imagine that.