KingdomCraft: Why is Christianity the correct religion?

[@anticommie11b]

You my friend are quickly becoming one of my favorite channels on KZbin. Keep it up. I loved your summary of each book of the Bible. Great work and God bless

[@arthroku-juroku8481]

i was hoping your points would be a bit more objectivity based but unfortunately your arguments are mostly just circular reasoning. this video is less “why christianity is real” and more “why christianity is better”. as a christian, i still agree with some of your views but i don’t think these arguments would convince non believers.

[@blakejhonshen2710]

As an Atheist myself, I can assure you that nothing he said was even remotely convincing, and almost everything he said was completely wrong. Plenty of religions, if not most, include instances of Gods revealing themselves directly to humans, and many include human avatars of Gods (e.g. Hinduism, Ancient Egyptian religion, etc) - and that's just for his first point. I discovered him recently with his video on the differences between Christian sects, and started watching his other videos because I'm very interested in world religions and I wanted to hear what else he had to say. Unfortunately, he seems to understand absolutely nothing about other religions and completely lacks self-awareness, which is sad given that he seems to have a deep wealth of knowledge about Christianity. I think he's letting his personal biases get in the way of his philosophical arguments, and he certainly does not understand anything about any other religions outside of Christianity. Even though I'm not a theist, I certainly like to understand other peoples' viewpoints, but I haven't found anything of value yet outside of his history videos. I've heard better arguments in favor of Christianity from other Atheists lol

[@nineinchthread]

​​@@blakejhonshen2710 his videos do make me think but alot of it kinda leaves a bad taste in my mouth.cant say what he being honest about and what he overreacting to. apparently everything none Christian is woke. I could be wrong and change my view but I'm still thinking

[@Timo0469]

Yo , i can see your point there

[@Senbu-dz1xp]

@@blakejhonshen2710I would recommend watching inspiring philosophy almost all his arguments are objective

[@silaswarren8418]

The point of the video was not to prove that Christianity is real, but why it is better. As he said, he already gave his proof for God in a previous video, so he didn’t detail it here.

[@wesreleases6346]

I believe this is the topic where apologetics, specifically the historical claims of Christianity, can be important. When many of the historical claims of the Bible- including its miracles- can be backed up, it means the religious claims of Christianity are also likely to be true. And Christianity makes the claim it is the exclusively true religion, leaving no true room for pluralism.

[@yourfavoritezoomer9104]

I'm not so sure. I feel like a lot of these points only hold up if you look at this from a Christian perspective. Like the point about Christ being the remedy to the natural evil inherent to humans. This in of itself is a Christian problem. Original sin is a concept that exist exclusively within the realm of Christianity and is not explored by religions like Islam. As such, I feel these critiques, while educational when pertaining to Christianity, simply do not apply to other religions.

[@iamishin7675]

I agree, but I also think that it is the logical conclusion that you come to if you don't subscribe to moral relativism. Under an atheist view you believe that we are just the random result of some cosmic accident and that we are only a product of nature and natural processes. Under this view you can not make a solid argument for morality at all. If someone believes that we should kill the homeless because they aren't helping society, you would probably inherently say that this is wrong because humans have an innate value regardless of how poor they are. But under an atheist view, you really can't argue that your views are superior to the other views because they are simply following the natural selection process which you believe to be natural order of things. You know that what they are doing is wrong, but the only logical way to come to that conclusion is to concede that there is such a thing as right and wrong in the first place. If you truly believe that all morality is relative and based on your experiences, that in itself is relative and based on your experiences, so there's no way that you can make that argument. Where you go from there is uncertain, but you must conclude that either: 1. All morality is relative, and there is nothing morally superior about your beliefs when compared to those that you find to be evil. (This means that chaos, tyranny, genocide, etc. are fine because morality is relative.) 2. There is such a thing as objective morality, which means that we humans have done serious evils. (This basically leads to Christianity.) Important to note that while you could make the argument that humans as a whole have done serious wrong, it is less easy to make the logical argument for all of humanity's inherent evil. With this in mind, I believe that any religious choice is not based on logic alone. From what I understand of Islam they believe in relative morality, which again, relativizes itself. I probably articulated this poorly, but I would highly recommend the book The Reason for God by Tim Keller. It goes over a lot of the logical questions for belief in god, and also gives the Christian answer to these questions.

[@yourfavoritezoomer9104]

@@iamishin7675 This was actually really insightful and intelligent. I appreciate it bro.

[@skull9545]

@@iamishin7675 Morals are not relative in Islam, who told you this?

[@vector4632]

@@iamishin7675 "1. All morality is relative, and there is nothing morally superior about your beliefs when compared to those that you find to be evil. (This means that chaos, tyranny, genocide, etc. are fine because morality is relative.)" That really threw me back to a Brazilian video from a small channel called Brasileirinhos, which quoted Dostoevsky saying: *"If God doesn't exist, everything is permitted."*

[@guzlemuzle]

25 million sex slaves around the world but “sin” is a christian problem only LOL. Open your eyes.

[@JustJimmyGD]

My man taught me Minecraft architecture AND apologetics. W

[@gnhman1878]

There are two main reasons as to why I believe in Christianity and believe that Christianity is the only correct religion: 1. The Christian God is the only god who can make true, genuine, accurate prophecies that were actually fulfilled. The Bible contains many fulfilled prophecies. Like, Daniel 11 predicts hundreds of historical events hundreds of years before their fulfillment in great detail and accuracy, and Ezekiel 26 predicted the destruction of Tyre, which really happened. Moreover, there are also hundreds of Messianic prophecies in the OT that all lead to Jesus. No other religion has these kinds of fulfilled prophecies. 2. The Christian God is the only god who can raise people from the dead. There is a lot of strong and solid historical evidence for the resurrection of Christ. Like, the resurrection of Christ has multiple eyewitness accounts; all of the four gospels; Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, claimed that Jesus rose from the dead after He died on the cross and was buried. The apostles were also killed for spreading the Gospel of Jesus' resurrection, and it has been historically confirmed that Jesus was buried in a tomb and that the tomb was empty.

[@meenapatel1648]

Hinduism just left the chat the moment you said that "Jesus is the only truly man and truly god" 😶

[@hanoord9412]

yeah and almost all polytheistic religions when he said christianity is the only one where god came down to us humans instead of humans tryong to reach god. I dont think i have to tell anyone how many myths there are of gods coming down to earth and intermingling with humans

[@sloppysloo8263]

@@hanoord9412 yh but he meant it in terms of saving us because Jesus came down to save us where usually in polytheists and pagan religions the gods coming down is to meddle with humans for some less good reason . There are probably exceptions however

[@hanoord9412]

@@sloppysloo8263 vishnu has descended many times in many forms to save mankind

[@sloppysloo8263]

@@hanoord9412 Hinduism right ?

[@hanoord9412]

@@sloppysloo8263 yes

[@lucidcross8282]

Really good video, I was actually planning on making a video on this topic and you pretty much mentioned many of the same points that I was going to make. I did however made a video on my channel called "The Gospel Explained" using some of the points you have made. I create animations on dreams to do my videos, kind of how you use Minecraft to make your videos. Keep up the good work dude.

[@BulwinskiJanusz]

1. Claiming that Christianity is correct simply because it embodies the properties of Christianity is a fallacious argument. It essentially amounts to saying, "My religion is the best because it is mine." 2. Christianity being touted as the best solution to the problem of evil is unfounded. Even if it were the most compelling solution known to humanity, it wouldn't automatically make it the true solution. Moreover, what makes it the best solution? Is it solely because of Christ? (see point 1) 3. You mention that the central event of Christianity, the resurrection, is a falsifiable miracle. How exactly is the resurrection falsifiable? You have failed to provide any evidence to support this assertion. Additionally, even if it were falsifiable, the burden of proof still rests on you. Can you provide any convincing evidence that supports the claim of Christ's resurrection actually occurring?

[@toproductions3931]

Majority of historians agree that the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ happened. This evidence is very easily accessible online and it includes things like Jesus’s tomb, a crucified foot, journals, scripture, eyewitnesses and more. Jesus has an empty tomb and while many Roman’s declare that the disciples stole his body, over 500 people claimed to see Jesus at one time, with a variety of other accounts. The disciples were willing to be brutally killed for them saying this. The reason why this is different from other religious related sacrifice, is that the disciples were willing to die for something that happened directly to them. It’s kind of long to explain so I suggest you look for evidence if it really interest you. Regardless, it will all seem crazy if you don’t make an effort to know god, so try and speak to him and know him. God bless!

[@Dock284]

@@toproductions3931 huh if only most historians weren't Christians

[@groundzero5708]

lol chrisitnaity founded the modern faculties of science .

[@blakejhonshen2710]

@@groundzero5708 Nope, Muslims invented the scientific method. European Christians simply helped create formal institutions. But even if that WERE the case (which is isn't) that doesn't mean anything, unless you now believe that Islam must be more true than you previously believed because they had the first large universities. Also, that comment is entirely pointless. How does that have ANY relevance to the falsifiability of the resurrection?

[@coyot7959]

i have watched the whole video, and i am responding the summary of it in 12:41 as a muslim: 1- the solution to the gap between man and God: that's an interesting point, so in your opinion God and humanity are so different that there needs to be a link between them for it to work. but i ask you, wouldn't just the words of God coming down count as a link between God and man? since its his words (holy) in text form (physical). so in a way, a literal human isn't needed, but instead just a link between 2 things exclusive to God and man. in this way just God sending someone to tell us what to do and what to believe is enough to make the bridge. 2- the solution to the problem of evil: to be fair, this seems like just a doctrine difference between Islam and Christianity. for us, evil isn't just something that needs to be deleted, it's more a result of the free will test that God has given us, so if God wanted to fix the problem, he could, but he doesn't want to, cuz it defeats the purpose of having a free will test. 3- being based on a falsifiable claim that hasn't been disproven: technically you are right, but also you can't exactly prove it. the proofs that the bible uses are just historic arguments that prove jesus did in fact exist, and that the bible (or at least some of it) was indeed written by jesus/wrote by the words that jesus said. So yes you can say Christianity did exist, but i don't think you can argue its sustainability, cuz over the years it was altered, the gospel is no longer just the word of God, and no one really knows what jesus said

[@xblizboii4793]

Salam brother well said

[@shoutforchoy]

Indeed. I would add to the first point that the Bible says Man is created in the image of G-d, so it's reasonable to say that man can connect with G-d without G-d becoming a man. I feel like to justify this point man and G-d would really have to be diametrically opposite to one and other, but if that was the case it would be impossible for something to be both G-d and man.

[@wyattfuchs6839]

Follow you on Instagram. Now I found you had a KZbin channel. God bless and thanks for your work.

[@zempov]

Can you do a video about religious anxiety/ religious OCD?

[@86damn86]

The video is great.... but basically 99% strawmans of other religions. 1) Many religions have some form of God incarnate, either explictly or in a language that may lead us not to see it: - Hinduism has the concept of avatars, who are deities incarnate. Each deity is a manifestation of the one God, making the avatars an incarnations of the one God. There are countless supposed Avatars even in the present century many of which are claimed to have performed miracles. The purpose of their descent is generally to enlighten and guide humans, spiritually and ethically. - Buddhism has the concept of non duality where the Buddha (and anything else) is one with the buddha body. While the Buddha body is generally not referred as God, that is because it is alwais experienced and described in first person: any enlightened person realised to be one with the body of infinite creation... which other religions may call God. - Shamans in indigenous societies, "die" into the infinite, and realise their union with the whole. 2) Your point about "solving the issue of evil" in buddhism is also a strawman. It's not that buddhists "accept" evil. They understand that suffering comes from illusion, and that by dispelling this illusion in one's own mind we can dispel suffering. Accepting reality as it is, is one part of that dispelling of the illusion... but it's a process that is inherently transformative. As people attain a more proper view of reality they also act more sanely, transforming material reality and not just their own mind. The whole point of the Bodhisattva vow is to try and help all beings be relieved from suffering. 3) The idea that the resurrection is falsifiable is really odd. How can i prove that the disappearance of a body is the product of divine reincarnation? Even if it is potentially falsifiable it still needs to be proven outside of faith or circumstantial evidence. Also: Trinitarianism is a concept that can be found in almost major spiritual traditions. This is one of the best examples of trying to recognize three main "domains" that all build up to one: sp-ao.shortpixel.ai/client/to_auto,q_lossless,ret_img,w_1031/kennethsorensen.dk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/great-chain-of-being.jpg

[@ianbowden2524]

That's not really an accurate description of Buddhism...lol

[@blakejhonshen2710]

It's not an accurate description of anything lol. He's just claiming his personal beliefs are absolute fact. I know Mormonism is extremely strange theologically (and don't even get me started on the culture), but it *is* a branch of Christianity because they follow Christ. Just because he doesn't think what they believe is "the most important aspect of Christianity" doesn't mean it actually is the most important aspect of Christianity and certainly doesn't define Christians as a whole.

[@ianbowden2524]

@@AmazingFit bro that was back in college i had no choice 😭

[@bipn_406]

@@blakejhonshen2710 Mormons are not Christians as they do not adhere to the core beliefs of Christianity.

[@thekatarnalchemist]

Mormons follow Christ, if by Christ you do not mean Christ. To be a Christian means, among other things, to accept the Trinity. Mormons explicitly reject it.

[@blakejhonshen2710]

@@thekatarnalchemist No, that's your personal opinion. The word Christian means "follower of Christ." The simply don't believe Jesus was the person you believe he is. Just because a bunch of humans got together to define something that wasn't explicitly stated in the Bible (seriously, the trinity is more of a read-between-the-lines thing) doesn't mean they're not Christians. That would be like me saying someone isn't American because they vote Republican or something; disagreeing with someone doesn't change their objective identities.

[@Snakefarm223]

“I think through nature and logic and reasoning we can come to a sense of monotheism” that reminded me about a book I’ve read by an Islamic philosopher called, “Hayy ibn yaqzan.” That’s basically the gist of it cause it’s about a guy who’s raised on a deserted island who comes to that conclusion but later becomes disillusioned after meeting with religious figures later in the book. I apologize if I’ve misrepresented it at all it’s been years since I’ve read it but I thought that was pretty neat.

[@nanashi7779]

This is precisely why Christianity is so untenable to me as a Muslim. No person living in a jungle tribe in Africa, or a nomad travelling a desert for example is going to naturally come to the conclusion that God is: "the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, begotten from the Father before all ages, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made; of the same essence as the Father. Through him all things were made." They would, conceivably, come to the conclusion that God is one and a creator however, as Hayy ibn Yaqzan describes. Trinitarianism just isn't natural, it isn't logical. Simple monotheism (tawhid, in Islam) is.

[@Snakefarm223]

@@nanashi7779 Hey someone else whose read the book! This marks the first time in my life that I've brought it up and someone knew what I was talking about. Also I agree with you that monotheism is the logical conclusion when contemplating God, but I believe the trinity often trips people up because at first glance it seems to not be monotheism. The big thing to realize, and I'm sure I'm not telling you anything new or thought provoking, is that the Nicene Creed was written to combat heresy and form a more united community pertaining to what the Orthodox way to practice Christianity is. It is not the key conclusion one would come to when contemplating God, that instead would be the gospel. While I know some denominations would hold strong to the idea of biblical inerrancy, holding firm to the idea that the entirety of the bible was dictated to the authors directly from the Holy Spirit. For the most part, we as Christians believe that The Bible was compiled more than a century after the death of Jesus and took several popular and circulating accounts of the life Jesus and compiled them. In a since The Bible is more of a library than a singular book so what is important from this is the story it portrays. That we, by our very nature, are sinful and there is no way for us alone to atone of that sin since God needs nothing from us. Therefore, it is only by the grace of god and his manifestation in the flesh that we are able to be forgiven. So after that entire short essay I finally got back to my main point that this is a belief that you can reach much more logically than contemplating the mysteries of the Holy Trinity. This we can only know to be true from what has been given to us by the bride of Christ, the church. This was such a short explanation that it borders on heresy and would love to talk more about it if you're interested. Also props to you as a Muslim for engaging in this space and looking for information in sources you might not even agree with! It's always nice to see people from different upbringings seek the truth that is God.

[@sloppysloo8263]

@@nanashi7779 yes that is true but thst is why Jesus came down to save us and why the Catholic Church is so important because Jesus spread the good word and the message of God and the church continues that preaching of the true faith and the core principles

[@perfectlyrandomstuff]

@@nanashi7779 That's why we have missionaries. They can come to a general belief in monotheism, but we as Christians tell them the whole story. And to you statement of no one naturally coming to that conclusion, once Christianity has been explained that way, nature affirms it, even if you couldn't come up with it solely from looking at a tree.

[@xravenx24fe]

​@Nanashi well yeah it doesn't make sense, because you're adding theological details to the Christian claim but purposefully omitting Muslim theology to make the Muslim claim seem more basic. It's really not. The trinity may be hard to grasp, but the idea that rationalizing or understanding the nature of the Islamic God is just as impossible. If you said instead that either both religions posit God as One being or essence or nature, or you included that the Islamic God was revealed through a final prophet that affirmed all the other prophets, including Jesus even though the previous revelation contradicts this final one, Islam would make WAY less sense to someone who knows nothing lol. It's all about framing, and you intentionally framed your example to make Islam's teaching make more sense when in reality it doesn't.

[@ajgibson1307]

Amen and God bless

[@CooperTheGoosebumpsGuy]

Amen😊

[@__-tn6hw]

What do you think it means for something to be falsifiable?

[@georgeandrews1394]

I think this guy understands what it means as a definition. He's just pretending that idea applies here when the thing he's talking about is not, on the whole, falsifiable. Parts are; we do have historical evidence for some things in the Bible. But the resurrection? No.

[@DavidelCientificoLoco]

There are litery eye witnesss acoaunts in religios and NON RELIGIOS books bro about the resurection plus you cand do your reserch bro and find The books bro, also their was a video recomanded to me about eye witnesss acoaunts of Jesus resurection but i don't renember the name of the video but it dosen't take that long to do a quick search on KZbin for the video,glad i could help God bless you(i mean it and i like beingkind) may you have a wonderfull day!​@@georgeandrews1394

[@ske_kt2048]

I mean these (especially the first two) might be reasons as to why Christianity would be the best option if it were true but are they arguments as for why it's true? Is/Ought problem and all that...

[@theway305g3]

Mashallh brother u know how to build castles

[@briangronberg6507]

For St. Thomas, God is one save where there is a relation (in the Aristotelian sense) of mutual opposition. He argues that the Persons of the Trinity are themselves relations within the Godhead. There are four such relations: paternity, filiation, common spiration (active spiration) and procession (passive spiration). Paternity and filiation are mutually opposed and thus are the Father and the Son. Common spiration and procession are mutually opposed and thus Procession is the Holy Spirit. However, while common spiration and procession are mutually opposed relations, in order that the Holy Spirit be distinguished from the Father and the Son, from the interplay of the mutually opposed relations of paternity and filiation, both relations in perfect harmony are themselves common spiration. This does not confuse the Father and the Son but shows them acting in concert so the relation of common spiration is not a person. At least that's what I remember.

[@CooperTheGoosebumpsGuy]

Amen❤🎉🎉🎉❤😊😊

[@waderutherford9083]

No Buddhism is about the person getting better and most the issues in Buddhism is essentially cravings and attachments. Not so much injustices. In some sects of Buddhism there is more impetus on the sangha to help and in other sects there is more impetus on the individual. They still believe in doing good and abstaining from evil which is more than just getting over the state of the world.

[@westerncentristrants525]

There's also the fact that the bible has many prophecies that you can argue have been fulfilled historically.

[@xXWesterlingXx]

Other religions also have prophecies that have been fulfilled

[@westerncentristrants525]

@@xXWesterlingXx Like which?

[@xXWesterlingXx]

@@westerncentristrants525 islam predricted skyscrapers, When the Prophet (ﷺ) was asked about the signs of the Final Hour, one of the signs he mentioned was "when you see the barefoot, naked, destitute shepherds competing in constructing tall buildings.”. When asked to elaborate further, the Prophet (ﷺ) said that they are from the Arabs. Hadith #2924 p. 43, the fall of constantintonople, Abu Qateel said, "We were with Abdullah ibn Umar (r.a), and he was asked, “Which city will be conquered - Constantinople or Rome?” 'Abdullah (r.a) called for a box to be brought, and he removed from it a book. Abdullah (r.a) said, “While we were (gathered) around the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and we were writing, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ was asked: ‘Which city will be conquered first - Constantinople or Rome?’ The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said: ‘The city of Hiraql (Heraclius) will be conquered first’ - i.e. Constantinople."' (Recorded in Musnad Ahmad and in Al Bidayah Wa Al Nihaya by Imam ibn Kathir -p72, لتفتحن القسطنطينية، فلنعم الأمير أميرها، ولنعم الجيش ذلك الجيش Verily you shall conquer Constantinople. What a wonderful leader will her leader be, and what a wonderful army will that army be! Musnad Ahmad 14:331 mass homosexuality in modern society,It is narrated that Jaabir (may Allah be pleased with him) said: “The Prophet (P.B.U.H) said: ‘There is nothing I fear for my ummah more than the deed of the people of Loot.” (Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 1457; Ibn Maajah, 2563, Saheeh al-Jaami’, no. 1552). the establishment of israel,And after him We said to the Children of Israel, ‘Dwell Ye in the promised land; and when the time of the promise of the Latter Days come, We shall bring you together out of various people.” (17:105) people will become litterate and illiteracy will drop massively And when books are spread abroad.”, diseases like aids and monkeypox It never happens that permissiveness overwhelms a people to the extent that they display their acts of sex shamelessly and they are not uniquely punished by God. Among them, invariably, pestilence is made to spread and such other diseases, the like of which have never been witnessed by their forefathers.” (Ibn-e-Majah, Kitab-ul-Fitan)* see footnote, these are just some of the ones that I can think of

[@westerncentristrants525]

@@xXWesterlingXx I'm back from vacation. 9/11 was not the first skyscraper to fall, it could mean a variety of things. Tall buildings have fallen throughout the ages. And the other things about disease and mass homosexuality has always been a thing. All the verses you mentioned were vague and could anything. The Bible has specific names and attributes that describe an event. For example, the old testament predicted that a king named Cyrus would free the Jews from captivity in Mesopotamia. A few centuries later, a Persian king named Cyrus really did do it. Just one example.

[@nineinchthread]

​@@xXWesterlingXx NGL I find that really interesting

[@insert-name-here6777]

You calim christian things and than "prove" christianity. Lol Example: Why does a god need to want to destroy evil without destroying humans? You need to answer this first before you can come with your argument.

[@insert-name-here6777]

@@AmazingFit Hahaha... avoiding it I see. Try to read better. Im not a native speaker and as the person that made the video mad dumb questions I didn't give much about my writing. So... are you're just avoiding the answers? Lol

[@nineinchthread]

​​@@insert-name-here6777 I think it annoying when people won't answer your question and just say spell bother.the left also does that Wich can be frustrating lol.maybe it the way you come off idk

[@Boone_Dogglers]

Your grammar is horrendous!

[@Otaku155]

For Jews, the Sinaitic Covenant was never abrogated; this means that as long as we still have the Torah, as well as the Rabbinical succession which began with Jeremiah 3, we're good to go.

[@trollgegael]

"Had there been within them [i.e., the heavens and earth] gods besides Allāh, they both would have been ruined. So exalted is Allāh, Lord of the Throne, above what they describe." Quran 21:22

[@groundzero5708]

lord of thorne , so god is some big man in another kingdom . i think trinity is mechanism how divine works in the world . in bahramic faiths god exist outisde the creation . by the way prophet muhammed recieves quran . where is that quran now ..altho shia has diferent believe how muahmmed recieves revelations

[@JemimaNta]

​@@groundzero5708leave him. He thinks his good works can save him meanwhile he can't count how many times he's lied

[@SantaFe19484]

Christianity is the only "religion" where you don't have to earn salvation. It futile to try to "prove" why we're "right", because many people want to be their own gods, they won't accept any "evidence".

[@skark1222]

It’s actually the hardest because God can’t just forgive you your sins because in Christianity every Sin means eternal Death. While in other Religions he just can. But that’s unjust. It’s like a Bank giving you a loan but you don’t have to pay it back. So Christianity actually has the harshest view on sin. Christianity is just the fulfillment of Judaism with Jesus being the Messiah. And the Messiah is supposed to carry the weight of our sin, as you can read in the Old Testament especially Isaiah. So you are right that we don’t have to “earn” salvation because we simply are not good enough to go there, whatever we do, that’s why we need Jesus. We can’t “earn” it. But Christians still have to try to be the best they can but we don’t rely on that. And I think every Religion tries to prove they are the one true Religion not just Christianity.

[@EndYouTubeShorts_]

I believe Christianity, but I figured out where you went wrong here. You said Christianity is the only religion that redeems us to God, but didn't explain much why we need that. This was a while ago, anyone know if he's done better recently?

[@Dock284]

This is just bad. This video basically only says that the Christian god is nicer than other gods (which is very much debatable) but who says god HAS to be nice? And you really mischaracterize other religions like Buddhism which doesn't help your case.

[@jeremiahmeade710]

How can God get rid of evil without getting rid of humans? He can’t. Humans are to become like God. Humans can’t be like God and remain human, because those two are mutually exclusive. We are to shed the mortal part of ourselves and gain spiritual bodies: we will then not be human anymore, but like God.

[@_xeere]

Most of these aren't actual reasons Christianity is right, they are just ways the Christian God is nicer than others. Who says God has to be nice? I also don't think you understand Buddhism well enough to talk about it. When they talk about being at piece with bad things, they don't mean allowing bad things to happen or doing nothing to stop them. They mean that many painful things that happen will have been impossible for you to prevent and so you should be at peace with them. Finally, the resurrection is not falsifiable. There is no hypothetical evidence I can show you that would convince you it didn't happen.

[@fa1509]

I can give you 4 reasons that the resurrection that it did happen

[@_xeere]

@@fa1509 That doesn't make it falsifiable, and how many of those reasons are just "someone said it happened"?

[@CooperTheGoosebumpsGuy]

Amen🙏🕊️❤️😇✝️😀😊🍞🍷🎉

[@williamvanbijsterveldt1928]

Hello Sir, I have recently stumbled upon your video and had a question. Wouldn't playing Minecraft in itself be considerd blasphemy? As you are "Creating a world in your image", "Playing God"? Till what point can you call something truely your own, and otherwise being used as an instrument of God to create something? Interresting video besides this!

[@redeemedzoomer6053]

Playing Minecraft is no more “blasphemy” than drawing a picture

[@lucidcross8282]

Nah, that wouldn't be blasphemous. Minecraft if anything is a tool he uses to communicate his message. For example I create animations on my channel and I use my animations to communicate my biblical messages. But it is in no way by intention to create a world of our own where we can be our own God. It's just to help get visuals while communicating a message.

[@saucyswipe]

People in Minecraft dont intend to make Adam and Eve. They just want to build

[@Logan912]

@@saucyswipe and even if someone did, it’s a video game. They’re not actually making people in real life.

[@WanderingMiqo]

That's like saying making music, drawing, taking a photograph, or even cooking is blasphemy. God created us and everything we are capable of. We use our God-given knowledge and curiousity to explore those gifts given to us and do things with them. If humanity had that mindset, we would have never accomplished anything worthwhile.

[@pseudoplotinus]

I don't see how the gap between man and God is problem for there to be a solution

[@alejandroortiz7177]

Because we have sinned against God and we actively sin against God and unknowingly, our sins affect us and others negatively. God is fair and just, and without a solid standards God would be no better than us. That is why Paul states in Romans 6:23 “the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” God coming down as flesh and dying in sacrifice for us is the grace and the solution. God is not A hypocrite so when He says the punishment of sin is death, He comes down as Man and dies for your sins.

[@pseudoplotinus]

@@alejandroortiz7177 Solution to what? All of what you said just seems really really arbitrary. Don't fret, though, I would really like to here more. I just don't feel very convinced right now.

[@alejandroortiz7177]

@@pseudoplotinus the solution to the problem that is the curse Adam had inflicted on the entire human race because he did not trust God, It is also a solution to defeating the Devil who was the Serpent that deceived Adam in the first place

[@nanashi7779]

@@alejandroortiz7177 Where does Jesus Christ say that the wages of sin are death?

[@alejandroortiz7177]

@@nanashi7779 “For the wages of sin is death, but the gracious gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭6‬:‭23‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬ Jesus didnt say it but Paul did

[@Quick-Silver206]

The arrogance of man is thinking he understands God.

[@someanimeguy4722]

Exactly man. God is an incomprehensible being that we can’t really understand the true nature of. Yet a lot of Christian’s still try to comprehend him. It’s not bad, but it doesn’t make sense to me.

[@sloppysloo8263]

I explained this in the reply section of the top comment as good as I could @TimeRainbow206

[@sloppysloo8263]

I mean the comment with the most replies

[@MisterShnig]

​@@someanimeguy4722 Christians don't think they can fully understand God. If God could fit in our little heads, he wouldn't be the God we think he is. We think we can understand certain aspects of him, though. And certainly we think we can understand enough. That said, I'm just browsing comments; don't know what he's said in the video but it seems even Christians don't think his talking points were particularly effective here :P

[@damaplehound]

​@@someanimeguy4722yeah, even though we christians may seem as if we have a complete understanding of god, in reality we don't, we try to explain certain aspects of god through what we believe was divinely revealed in the bible but really he is beyond comprehension, the trinity is a perfect example of this and why I think it is more logically plausible than an unitarian god, because it is not understandable but at the same time logically follows the characteristics of god, if we are unitarian beings and expect god to be superior to us in all aspects, why shouldn't he have the ability to be multipersonal?

[@isaacng123456789]

Why does "the correct religion" require a solution between the gap of man and God? Why is "getting rid of evil" a requirement of "the correct religion?" It is laughable to believe something is true because someone could have proven it to be false. And somehow this is a requirement of "the correct religion?" This is true of most religion. Islam Mohammad could have existed and could have communicated with God as well. The Buddha could have existed and achieved enlightenment as well.

[@boshi9]

Yes, most of the points in the video are just reasons why Christianity appears preferable to this guy, not why it's necessarily more correct than other religions. It could be that God exists but doesn't even care about humans in the slightest, and therefore humanistic categories such as "good" and "evil" don't apply, just like we don't care if animals commit adultery, etc. People prefer a religion that promises them an important role in the creation / some sort of closeness to god, even though it's just as possible that we are merely a by-product of processes that exist for a whole different purpose.

[@thekatarnalchemist]

I advise reading Peter Kreeft's Handbook of Christian Apologetics. He answers all of these questions and more in there.

[@source3nergy203]

Hmm

[@rilosvideos877]

You assume that the bible is correct and given directly by god - not one thought about corruption or human intentions!? If so, you may be right, but the problem is you can read and understand the bible in so many ways that you can find good arguments for every christian denomination! And of course this is true for islam and the quran, for the mormons and their book of mormon, the buddhists and their spiritual scriptures etc. etc. I think you got the point? ;-) Sorry to say, but this kind of proof is pointless!

[@crazydov]

I think u can do a lot better than this bro

[@RPFA_media]

Bro nah how the duck a god would be a human and how god knows everything then why Jesus didn’t know the time ??? And yea speaking about BIBBLE tell me why there is a lot of different bibbles while the Quran there is one holy book and every copy of quran have the same words 💀 your religion isn’t the real one mate believe it or not

[@drchipmunk3247]

I am god man 🦸