Kitty Comes To Testify (Film Version) | Oppenheimer Soundtrack

Рет қаралды 73,857

Film Version & Unreleased Soundtracks

Күн бұрын

Music by
Ludwig Göransson
If you guys enjoy what I do and/or you found out here the music that you've been searching, you can donate a small amount (no minimum or maximum amount required) on this link:
revolut.me/the...

Пікірлер: 31

@Brandon_4272 6 ай бұрын

3:15 Strauss - Interestingly enough, this is no longer a confirmation hearing, it's now a trial about a trial! Aide - It's not good he's telling everyone you initiated the hearings Strauss - He can't prove a God damn thing. He certainly can't prove that I gave the file to Borden. Aide - We're not in court, sir. There's no burden of proof. Strauss - Right. They're not convicting... just denying. But why would Hill come here to tear me down? What's his angle? Aide - Do people need a reason to do the right thing? As he sees it. Strauss- I told you, Oppenheimer poisoned the scientists against me right from that first meeting. I don’t know what Oppenheimer said to him that day, but Einstein wouldn’t even meet my eye. Oppenheimer knows how to manipulate his own. At Los Alamos, he preyed on the naivete of scientists who thought they'd get a say in how we used their work. Don't ever think he was that naive himself. Back to Interrogation - Doctor, during your work on the hydrogen bomb, were you… deterred by any moral qualms? Yes, of course. But you still got on with your work, didn’t you? Yes, because this was work of exploration, it was not the preparation of a weapon. You mean it was more of an academic excursion? No, it is not an academic thing, whether you can build a hydrogen bomb. It’s a matter of life and death. By 1942, you were actively pushing the development of the hydrogen bomb, weren’t you? Pushing's not the right word. Supporting it and working on it, yes. So when did these moral qualms become so strong that you actively opposed the development of the hydrogen bomb? When it was suggested that it be the policy of the United States to make these things at all costs, without regard to the balance between these weapons and atomic weapons as part of our arsenal. What do moral qualms have to do with that? What do moral qualms have to do with it? Yes. Strauss - Oppenheimer wanted to own the atomic bomb. He wanted to be The Man Who Moved the Earth. He talks about putting the nuclear genie back in the bottle. Well, I’m here to tell you that I know, J. Robert Oppenheimer, if he could do it all over, he’d do it all the same. You know he’s never once said that he regrets Hiroshima? He’d do it all over. Why? Because it made him the most important man who ever lived. Back to Interrogation - Well, we've freely used the atomic bomb. In fact, Doctor, you assisted in selecting the target to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, didn’t you? Yes… Well then, you knew, did you not, that by dropping that atomic bomb on the target you selected, that thousands of civilians would be killed or injured. Is that correct? Yes, not as many as turned out. Oh. Then how many were killed or injured? 70,000. 70,000, both Hiroshima and… 110,000 to both. On the day of each bombing? Yes. Yes. And in the weeks and years that followed? It has been put at somewhere between 50,000 and 100,000. 220,000 dead, at least. Yes. Any moral scruples about that? Terrible ones. But yet you testified in here that the bombing of Hiroshima was very successful. Technically successful. Oh! Technically it was very successful. And it is also alleged to have helped to end the war. Would you have been supportive of the dropping of a hydrogen bomb on Hiroshima? That would make no sense at all. Why? The target is too small. Well, supposing there had been a target in Japan big enough for a thermonuclear weapon, would you have been opposed to the dropping of it? This was not a problem with which I was confronted. Well, I’m confronting you with it now, sir. Strauss - It was all part of his plan. He wanted the glorious, insincere guilt of the self-important to wear like a fucking crown and say, “No, we cannot go down this road,” even as he knew we’d have to. Back to interrogation - Would you have been opposed to the dropping of a thermonuclear weapon on Japan because of moral scruples? Yes, I believe I would, sir. Did you oppose the dropping of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima because of moral scruples? We set forth our… No, you, you, you, you! I’m asking you… I set… You, you, you! I set forth our arguments against dropping it, but I did not endorse them. You mean after working night and day for three years building the bomb, you then argued against the use of it? I was asked by the Secretary of War what the views of scientists were. I gave them the views against and the views for. You supported the dropping of the Atom bomb on Japan, didn’t you? What do you mean… You supported it… What do you mean, support? Well, you helped pick the target, didn’t you? I did my job. I was not in a policy-making position at Los Alamos. I would have done anything I was asked to do. Well, then, you would have built the H-bomb too, wouldn’t you? I couldn’t… I didn’t ask you that, Doctor! And the GAC report, which you co-authored after the Soviet atomic test said: “A Super bomb should never be built!” What we meant, what I meant… What you, who? Look, what I meant… Who? Well, wouldn’t the Russians do anything to increase their strength? If we did it, they would have to do it! Our efforts would only fuel their efforts, just as it had with the atomic bomb! Just as it had with the atomic bomb, exactly! No moral scruples in 1945, plenty in 1949. Doctor Oppenheimer, when did your strong moral convictions develop with respect to the Hydrogen Bomb? (Pause) When it became clear to me, that we would tend to use any weapon we had.

@georgeofhamilton 5 ай бұрын

No moral scruples in 1945, _plenty_ in 1949.

@yugihlh Ай бұрын

I literally have this entire scene memorized 😅😅

@Liry1 9 ай бұрын

Honestly thank you so much for this. I noticed the film had a different score upon rewatch and wanted a full version.

@rknight9543 9 ай бұрын

I noticed that myself! Notably the scenes of Strauss ranting that were not included in the official release!

@CalMan742 25 күн бұрын

E - Einstein O - Oppenheimer R - Roger Robb S - Strauss A - Senate aid to Strauss 2:57 E - He has a point. O - I’m not sure you understand, Albert. E - No? I left my country never to return. You served your country well. If this is the reward she offers you, then… perhaps you should turn your back on her. O - Damb it, I happen to love this country. E - Then tell them to go to hell. 3:21 S - Interestingly enough, this is no longer a confirmation hearing, it’s now a trial about a trail! A - It’s not good he’s telling everyone you initiated the hearings. S - He can’t prove a goddamn thing. He certainly can’t prove that i gave the file to borden. A - We’re not in court, sir. There’s no burden of proof. S - Right. They’re not convicting… just denying. Why would Hill come here to tear me down? What’s his angle? A - Do people need a reason to do the right thing? As he sees it. S - I told you, Oppenheimer poisoned the scientists against me, right from that first meeting. I don’t know what Oppenheimer said to him that day, but Einstein wouldn’t even meet my eye. Oppenheimer knows how to manipulate his own. And at Los Alamos, he preyed on the naivete of scientists who thought they’d get a say in how we used their work. They will never think he was that naive himself. 4:18 R - Doctor. During your work on the hydrogen bomb, were you, deterred by any moral qualms? O - Yes, of course. R - But you still got on with your work, didn’t you? O - Yes, because this was work of exploration. It was not the preparation of a weapon. R - You mean it was more of an academic excursion? O - No, it is not an academic thing whether you can build a hydrogen bomb. It’s a matter of life and death. R - By 1942, you were still actively pushing the development of the hydrogen bomb, weren’t you? O - Pushing’s not the right word. Supporting it and working on it, yes. R - So when did these moral qualms become so strong that you actively opposed the development of the hydrogen bomb? O - When it was suggested that it be the policy of the United States to make these things at all costs, without regard to the balance between these weapons and atomic weapons as part of our arsenal. R - What do moral qualms have to do with that? O - What… what do moral qualms have to do with it? R - Yes 5:08 S - Oppenheimer wanted to own the atomic bomb. He wanted to be the man who moved the Earth. He talks about putting the nuclear genie back in the bottle. Well, I’m here to tell you that i know J. Robert Oppenheimer and if he could do it all over, he’d do it all the same. You know he’s never once said that he regrets Hiroshima? He’d do it all over, why? Because it made him the most important man who ever lived. 5:34 O - Uh… we’ve… we’ve freely used the atomic bomb. R - In fact, Doctor, you assisted in selecting the target to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, didn’t you? O - Yes. R - Well then you knew, did you not, that by dropping that atomic bomb on the target you selected, that thousands of civilians would be killed or injured, is that correct? O - Yes, not as many as turned out… R - Oh. Well, how many were killed or injured? O - 70,000. R - 70,000 at both Hiroshima and… O - 110,000 at both. R - On the day of each bombing? … O - Yes. R - And the weeks and years that followed? O - It… it has been put somewhere between fifty and one hundred thousand. R - 220,000 dead, at least. O - Yes… R - Any moral scruples about that? … O - Terrible ones. R - But yet you testified in here that the bombing of Hiroshima was very successful. O - Technically successful. R - Oh! Technically, it was very successful. O - And it is also alleged to have helped end the war. R - Would you have supported the dropping of a hydrogen bomb, on Hiroshima? O - That would make no sense at all. R - Why? O - The… the… the target is too small. R - Well, supposing there had been a target in Japan big enough for a thermonuclear weapon, would you have been opposed to the dropping of it? O - This was not a problem which i was confronted… R - Well I’m confronting you with it now, sir. 6:40 S - It was all part of his plan. He wanted the glorious, insincere guilt to the self-important to wear like a fucking crown. Say "No, we cannot go down this road," even as he knew, we’d have to. 6:54 R - Would you have been opposed to the dropping of a thermonuclear weapon on Japan because of moral scruples? O - Yes, i believe i would, sir. R - Did you oppose the dropping of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima because of moral scruples? O - We set forth our arg… R - No, you, you, you, you, you, you, I’m asking… O - I set… R - You, you! O - I set forth our arguments against dropping it, but i did not endorse them. R - You mean after working night and day for three years building the bomb, you then argued against the use of it. (Laughs) O - I was asked by the Secretary Of War what the views of scientists were. I gave him the views against, and the views for. R - (Continuous laughter) You supported the dropping of the atom bomb on Japan, didn’t you… O - What do you mean, "support"? R - You supported it… O - What do you mean, "support"?! R - Well you helped pick the target, didn’t you? O - I did my job. I was not in a policymaking position at Los Alamos. I would’ve done anything i was asked to do. R - Then you would have built the H-bomb too, wouldn’t you? O - I couldn’t… R - I didn’t ask you that, Doctor! And the GAC report, which you co-authored after the Soviet atomic test, said "A super bomb should NEVER BE BUILT"! O - What we meant… what i meant was… R - What, you? Who? O - What i meant… R - Who? … R - And wouldn’t the Russians do anything to increase their strength? O - If we did it, they would have to do it. Our efforts would only fuel their efforts, just as it had with the ATOMIC BOMB! R - "Just as it had with the atomic bomb," EXACTLY!

@CalMan742 25 күн бұрын

Took me A LOT of effort and a long time so hope this helps in some ways if your acting it out or smth. 👍

@rknight9543 9 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for uploading this masterpiece! Drastically different to the official release!

@nicolaslabra2225 9 ай бұрын

way darker and more tense

@rknight9543 9 ай бұрын

@@nicolaslabra2225 Absolutely, and packs a bigger punch than the official release.

@IamNinjaOfNinja 8 ай бұрын

the music clearly had a soul with Kitty on this. You can feel her character getting vulnerable but she gained strength and overcame it. 2:12 onwards with the violin is the most powerful part imo

@georgeofhamilton 5 ай бұрын

It’s funny how this track is called “Kitty Comes to Testify” when most of it doesn’t involve Kitty’s testimony.

@jamesdelaney5969 8 ай бұрын

The best version

@-cvq 9 ай бұрын

thank you 3:15

@Kristyna_Sulkova 8 ай бұрын

Exactly!

@cjags1232 4 ай бұрын

A SUPER BOMB SHOULD NEVER BE BUILT

@TheProtagonist2020 4 ай бұрын

What we meant… what I meant.

@crAzytitAn4741 4 ай бұрын

@@TheProtagonist2020what YOU? Who?

@georgeofhamilton 3 ай бұрын

Who? Who? What are you, an owl?

@nithinsuku 9 ай бұрын

How did you get this version of the OST. It's so good!

@jamesdelaney5969 9 ай бұрын

I love Kitty

@lanceawesomeness6730 3 ай бұрын

"If we did it they will have to do it, our efforts would only fuel their efforts just as it had with the Atomic Bomb!"

@pablosaezhurtado-96 5 ай бұрын

MARAVILLOSO. ÚNICO. INEFABLE. DIOS AGUARDE UN LUGAR ACORDE A NOLAN EN EL CIELO.

@AndrewVallows 6 ай бұрын

Thank you so much. Subscribed.

@BradleyG01 7 ай бұрын

This is the song I wanted most. Thank you How did you get these? Some parts sound like you used AI to separate the songs from the film, but the amount of distortion present is several orders of magnitude less than what I have obtained when trying to use similar programs on my own.