Klee Irwin - Are We in a Simulation? - Part 6B - Cosmological Framework

Love our work? Help us continue our research by joining our giving circle. Even just $1/month helps us further our cause: quantumgravity...
In our cosmological framework, a code or language is composed of a finite set of symbols, also known as letters. The letters can be anything, and the code is defined by a set of rules for arranging the symbols in a network. The rules govern how the symbols are networked in a hierarchical fashion, leading to emergent meaning, such as how letters form words, sentences, paragraphs, and so on. The code also has syntactical freedom, which allows for multiple ways of arranging the symbols. In the same way, quantum gravity is considered a language because it fits these definitions.
The universe started with fundamental particles, like quarks and gluons, which self-organized into the early hydrogen universe, where atoms were formed. The rules of quantum mechanics and gravity govern how the symbols are arranged, and have degrees of syntactical freedom that are non-deterministic. The universe has an increasing complexity and direction of time, represented by its self-organization into stars, planets, galaxies, and galaxy clusters. Physical structures hold just as much meaning as abstract concepts do, and the evolution of the universe is reflected in the increasing complexity of the code. Eventually, the code led to the emergence of single-celled organisms, and then complex systems like the human body and consciousness. Every thought and chemical reaction in the body is the result of a vast network of quantum thermodynamic micro-events that are encoded in a genetic architecture.
In this cosmological perspective, everything is believed to be influencing everything else through the entire hierarchical evolutionary structure. A linear time evolution, in which each step causes the next, is easier to grasp as it aligns with our tendency to see the world as classical and local. When retrocausality is allowed, it makes every event part of a feedback loop that can influence events in both directions of time.
Are we in a simulation?
This multi-part series is about the nature of reality. One philosophy to consider is materialism, which is the guess that reality is not made of information at its core but is made of material or matter. The digital physics revolution is the increasingly popular belief among physicists that materialism is a false philosophy and that reality is literally made of information vs being conveniently described by it.
If reality is made of information, two candidates for what its substrate would be include: (1) An emergent universal computer. Or (2) an emergent universal mind. Either one could serve as the substrate to hold and process information.
The series starts with an emphasis on the instability of human civilization in the 21st century and how quickly old scientific and cultural belief systems are changing. It ends with the provocative suggestion that a clearer scientific picture of what reality is could shift humanity off course from its current high potential for apocalypse. Specifically, if the truer picture turns out to be a status quo rejection of the ancient philosophy of materialism, the implication is that it would change how humanity evolves and interacts on this planet going forward.
quantumgravityresearch.org
kleeirwin.com
Love our work and want more content? Please support our mission, even $1/month helps: quantumgravity...

[@engineerjagdeep]

In this world full of distractions, with this work, you are on to something significant not only scientifically for the academic world but also extremely life-relevant for everyone. We may or may not be living in a simulation (macro-simulation), but one thing we can be sure of is that we have an influence on what goes on inside us (micro-simulation) through our consciousness as nicely explained in this video, probably that's the only part we have control over in this simulation.

[@TheRealFranc]

Thanks for making it clear at 17:04 "Quantum Mechanics is the theory devoid of Life, it's a theory for things like rocks and the floor I'm standing on and the atoms therein. AND ALSO at 25:12 "DNA is a quasi crystal by the way". Would love to see a simulation of how this is so. Nice work on the video editing. Klee Irwin has an exceptional video production team. I hope an outstanding documentary is in order for the general public in movie theaters.

[@mikesmz]

Hello Klee! You and your team @QGR are doing great work. Exremely interesting looking forward to many more episodes.. Cheers!

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

More to come! Thank you!

[@satori8600]

Wow - I’m constantly in awe of these videos & concepts. Absolutely incredible thinking - way beyond me but I’m slowly catching on. Thank you thank you thank you 🤓🙏🏼💫

[@blijebij]

Is there nothing under Information. What carries information. Love the passion and curiousity that this work is expressing. Beautifully presentated.

[@angeldernel88]

AMAZING! Keep up the astonishing work!!!

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

Thank you! Cheers!

[@apalomba]

This was awesome! We are getting closer and closer to the expression of understanding that will set us free.

[@Aldraz]

Okay, this is revolutionary! Suddenly a lot of things make sense for me personally. With EC, being able to sort of disobey the rules of statistics of quantum mechanics, I thought that the obvious one is that we gain control, not just awareness with consciousness, but the control. Control over many different aspects of our mind abstractions and EP as such. It is very similar when you gain or lose consciousness inside of the Lucid dream. You slowly gain control and the more conscious you are the more you are able to do things, like even changing physics, then you may slowly lose it again, together with the awareness/memory. Or when you go to sleep, wake up, it is also gradual and about gaining or losing control.

[@InnerLuminosity]

I never clicked so fast! Thank you for spreading this TRUTH

[@rezadaneshi]

So if you create something or even think of it, it makes it easier for universe to do it for you if you know what to manipulate. Focusing on specific probability with intention, magnified if done in a network in a web. The creation of intention is your EP6+. Nice

[@0ptimal]

I do think they're piecing it all together. I think life was an intended outcome. Something made the odds irrelevant. For us, things like certainty are a glimpse of the process.

[@avrilbarker4570]

Am loving this series!

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

Thank you! So glad to hear it!

[@DarkBurster]

I am actually surprsied I understood most of that great video

[@eduamart11]

Would EC be considered free will?

[@rhondalarson-fekkes6023]

What was just explained is called entropy!

[@edwincupely]

Dear Klee Irwin and QGR scientists. I like very much your view of the universe and your approach on the QG Theory. However, I am asking myself where are you leaving the hyper-reality witnessed by persons who have had a near-death experience, as this could be a transdimenssional interaction in a place where we go after death, and where seems to not exist time as we know it. The testimony of neurosurgeon Dr. Aben Alexander could be a good starting point, and the research of the University of Virginia on reincarnation. I see a connection on the three topics in terms of an explanation of reality. Thank you.

[@kennethwilliams4169]

Do we need to look beyond space time and quantum mechanics to ideas like the amplituhedron and decorated permutations?

[@frun]

Amplituhedron was proven to work for specific qft, not for the standard model yet.

[@brandonvinson5255]

You see the runes too?

[@maha-madpedo-gayphukumber1533]

We are not living in simulation. simulation is living in us. Simulation is within us

[@deadalivegang]

been waiting 🥺

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

More to come!

[@EricHrahsel]

I finished the video not understanding anything but it was good

[@benridge6570]

This must be true. CONSIDER the state of the world.

[@cyrus05w]

Between 3 minutes and 4 seconds and the 9 minute mark, do do one of my disabilities that was taken care of in my youth I'm wondering if this organization has contacted the deer Creek facility and touched base with them on any thing that may be corresponding. With the above I would suggest a doctor chin I would also suggest a Miss Gato but I believe she's passed away.

[@cyrus05w]

I'm only up to 20 minutes 53 seconds but I have to say thank you for reminding people of this particular waves scenario

[@seeker80]

🧐

[@JasonBunting]

While being able to explain the simulation, the implementation thereof, etc. it only takes a single experience with certain states of mind to feel that it's real. I mean, I can kick a piece of furniture and feel the pain, I don't need someone to explain the details of how it happened and why, etc.

[@noahclaycameron]

Your speech pattern makes more sense as poetry

[@sebringb]

Psychohistory... First Foundation perhaps?

[@Lolligag]

One artistic critique given with total respect and appreciation is I find the image montage to be very distracting as I try to understand the meaning of words expressing these complex ideas. Ironic that the content is about efficiency of meaning; when the content seemed to cause ‘friction’ at least for my ability to focus on the words. The images imo do not need to be there, or perhaps use them during lulls or transitions but not during important dialogue between narrator and viewer. The next video I plan to listen but not watch. Thank you for sharing your work with us.

[@ALEXGIBSONCMG]

The images are symbolic landmarks for whats being talked about, it actually makes it easier for some to follow and process, however i can see someone with a more internalized process of comprehension might find them distracting, personally i find it helps with indexing the concepts in memory.

[@marcelinogauguin]

I find the images inspiring. It actually helps taking in the propositions in the talk.

[@jdoe9518]

Imagine if there were a way to listen to the words without using your eyes to look at the pictures....

[@C0Y0TE5]

It all depends on YOU: are U a visual learner? There are many parts of the brain all doing different stuff, as well as we have TWO brains in our heads: one doing logic while the other prefers more creative influences. -- If your left brain is dominant, it will demand more logical inputs. Try to be like a twin cylinder Harley Davidson, and not a single-banger scooter.

[@peterjol]

Probably not but I wouldn't dismiss the possibility either.

[@GuardianesdelaTierra13]

🌹

[@johntitorii6676]

What the heck u talkin bout

[@QuantumGravityResearch]

We're talking about reality. What u talkin bout?

[@charlescowan6121]

Does David have a lady? He could be using action potential and plung to the bottom of her energy well.