Excellent video, thank you for sharing the percentages! I love a high-low bottom hem and appreciate this information. I am sure to use it.
@TheUnapologeticKnitter10 ай бұрын
Fantastic! I'm so glad you'll give it a whirl.
@LouseSmith3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much identity for over 50 years been trying to catch on to this but I was going from the bottom up and I usually knit sweaters from top down now you made it easier much planar to me you are blessed you have such a way of explaining things may God be with you
@maryleonardi-cattolica1640Ай бұрын
Terrific video. I've been adding a high/low hems for years and just winging it. It's great to actually have the math.
@robinknits6493Ай бұрын
I am a budding tech editor--certified by TKGA. But I still need to learn a lot about different constructions. Your videos have been invaluable. Thanks for putting them out. Much appreciated.
@angelawatkins54553 ай бұрын
This is so helpful. Thank you so much for the time you put into making this video.
@deniseengel145111 ай бұрын
Thanks again Megan for the excellent explanation. I feel like I could accomplish this if I wanted to. You have a great week!
@aylamonicАй бұрын
Thank you so much this was very clear and was a huge help and figuring this out!
@LottaSocks11 ай бұрын
Love your explanations! I like to do math-y things, so I find this fun & then think about other applications. Last week = top down SRs, longer to shorter. This week = top down SRs for hi-low hem. I generally prefer top down construction, but… Question: If making a bottom up (raglan) SR neck shaping would - in essence - be made similar to THIS weeks video, shorter to longer SRs… (ala the hi-low hem shaping). Correct? The percentages/# of sts may/may not change depending on desired results. I guess I’m trying to “reverse engineer” a top down SR neck shaping with a bottom up. Some patterns I like are bottom up, and I was curious. My go-to top down is made ala Barbara Walker, where you work back & forth, increasing at edges of piece, and then cast on xxx sts for front neck, all creating a higher back neck. I think Ann Budd also has a book/patterns using this concept. Wrap & Turns in st st … I kept messing up (=ugly wrap pick ups). Since I learned how easy German Short rows are to make & resolve (no more ugly sts!!!), I don’t “fear” the SRs now!
@teleuteskitty7 ай бұрын
Thanks for your work on this, it's extremely helpful and clearly communicated. Sorry I'm late to the party (although I've subscribed now), and hope you don't mind me asking a question: I've always wondered, if you are adding significant depth to one side, should you also add increases to accomodate the larger circumference needed to complete the round? Otherwise, wouldn't you create a kind of hump? For example, I'm thinking of adding about 2" to the back of a fingering weight sweater, so will need about 18 short rows.
@TheUnapologeticKnitter7 ай бұрын
You’re most welcome and thank you for subscribing! And no, you don’t need any extra circumference with increases. I actually just added 24 rows to a fingering weight sweater myself and there’s no hump or puckering. You’re just changing the shape of the hem, not actually adding any real circumference. I hope this helps!
@annettehoffmeister414410 ай бұрын
Thank you so so much 🧶😊
@nicolethomas493611 ай бұрын
I was wondering if you had it in your que to do a step by step tutorial on a top down sweater with “ set in sleeves ?”
@TheUnapologeticKnitter11 ай бұрын
I don't currently, no. While I'm happy to create tutorials with information about techniques you can use to adapt a pattern I don't create step by step tutorials on actual garment construction. So if you'd like to learn more about set in sleeves I'm happy to add that to the queue!
@nicolethomas493611 ай бұрын
@TheUnapologeticKnitter sounds good ... thank you I look forward to that tutorial!
@teslaandhumanity738312 күн бұрын
How do I make a pattern larger for my size , the pattern I love doesn’t do my size . Should I use the difference between say 3 xl to 4 xl to get 5 xl . My bust is 50” unfortunately. I have dyscalcula and struggle with maths 🧮.