You're machining faster than my little mill can rapid...
@CNCLearningAndEngineeringTech5 жыл бұрын
Perfect CAM programming. Awesome work.
@ugetridofit5 жыл бұрын
Love you vids. I am not a CNC guy, so here you are making a part from a block of aluminum. I never seen a video for how you remove the part from the rest of the block that is clamped to the bed.
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
Go back a few weeks and you will see a video showing the making of that fixture plate and how it works. Thanks
@phillipwebb97415 жыл бұрын
Mr. Titan, you are a genius. I wished I could work with you. I just want to learn more.
@stexxvan5 жыл бұрын
Nice to see there is still new videos coming up
@randy80ism5 жыл бұрын
How good are those machines to machine on cast iron? Just asking because they have a small CNC machine at my work. It machines the parts very slow. Compared to an old agent hydraulic machine called a carousel that has 5 stationary stations.
@frankr6085 жыл бұрын
Is your UMC fixture interchangeable to mount on your DMU 50?
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
Yes
@Evolvescalate5 жыл бұрын
I dont work much with aluminium these days but when i did i remember we used to rough both sides climb & conventional, saves quite a lot of time on the rapid moves and the overall movements. Not sure it will work with this kind of feed and AP but if it would, it would save quite some time. Have you tried it ? Im curious :)
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
It works great in some applications, and not in others... your running over your chips in tight spaces... but with aluminum it doesn’t really matter. Tool gets dull faster... but if you save money then it’s ok
@StraightUpFerret5 жыл бұрын
What is a good resource for determining optimal RPM? We usually run our tools at the highest RPM we can but running at max torque would be useful
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
Ask for your torque curve on your specific machine. There is a balance as higher RPMS reduce pressure especially with 5 flutes. So go 20-30% past for high end torque RPM... and try it.
@StraightUpFerret5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help!
@automan12235 жыл бұрын
Groove lock shanks have a corresponding ER Collet ?
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
Safe-Lock sleeves I did a video on it a few weeks ago.
@mustaphaaitkhouyaali4308 ай бұрын
How.much step over are u doing ?
@corsiar5 жыл бұрын
What CAM software was used to program these cuts?
@Not-C-4185 жыл бұрын
When i get a CNC machine i will sleep inside of it for the rest of my life .
@The-Gingineer5 жыл бұрын
I mean, if you sleep in it while it's running, you'll def spend the rest of your life in it...
@Not-C-4185 жыл бұрын
@@The-Gingineer let me get one first i will deal with the noise problems later 😂😂
@goldman72675 жыл бұрын
He didn't mean noise problems, he meant you'd be ripped apart by the tool. You wouldn't need any coolant though
@Not-C-4185 жыл бұрын
@@goldman7267 lol
@josha96205 жыл бұрын
I have a question I run my Haas vf3 around 90 to 100 load when roughing now with a dynamic cut when the cutter enters the cut it can get up to 135 is this hard on the spindle running hard like that all the time?
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
Make sure you ramp in Radially... gradually... so the pressure builds to 90. Don’t dive in at 90’ instead come in at 30... but Fast. In 5 yrs you might have to trade out a $6000 Spindle... but with an aggressive style... you will have made enough money to buy 10 + spindles etc:-)
@marcusmadrid75085 жыл бұрын
Can you push more radially? Like 30%
@ExMachinaEngineering5 жыл бұрын
@Travis Casey Actually the gullet has to do with chip thickness, not radial engagement. I would guess, sure you could do 30%, you could even do 100%, but you would have to reduce the feedrate to an extent that you get less MRR. I am guessing here, have not used the actual tool.
@1Corinthians151-44 жыл бұрын
5 flute aluminum cutter? That's very unusual... I always use 3... but the results are speaking for themselves
@TiMechOfficial5 жыл бұрын
but thats aluminium or steel? can you test something like - we called this in germany - X 155 CrVMo 12-1 ? would be interesting what feed rate you can use for this material?
@DiDe2735 жыл бұрын
Some blend of cro-moly vs 6061? C'mon man you know the results
@TiMechOfficial5 жыл бұрын
@@DiDe273 na sorry im not into that i machine daily these types like X155 or X210 or 90MnCrV8 / X8. but as is said would like to see this mill with these materials how they work together!
@timothycharley25845 жыл бұрын
Only 8500 rpm? Is that because the HAAS spindle sounds really bad at 15,000 rpm? Destiny Tools still have more metal removal rate and cost 1/4 of what they're asking for Snor-5 😅
@TheAlexLegolas5 жыл бұрын
Whats 10% ratio? Great advice
@fordhoarder5 жыл бұрын
10% of the tool's diameter. In this case it's a .750" tool so his radial step over is .075"
@TheAlexLegolas5 жыл бұрын
@@fordhoarder Thanks.
@pawan01645 жыл бұрын
How is the tool life?
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
It’s a Beast and runs forever... I have never broken one, even when it gulled at 1600 IPM. Crazy
@pawan01645 жыл бұрын
TITANS of CNC: Academy thanks for the information
@RAVANASURA685 жыл бұрын
Superb
@ragupathimech84895 жыл бұрын
Wow😮😮😮
@Thepriest395 жыл бұрын
If I could only get one of those machines...
@returnedfrompanama9 ай бұрын
The step over distance seems too small. You should be hogging more than that. You could have run that at maximum rpm.
@mash80505 жыл бұрын
Now try this with Hastelloy 😉
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
BOOM 😂😂😂😂 kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4OTaGeMmJtsq80
@Motor-City-Mike5 жыл бұрын
If you're going to show"the king of roughing" show it in steel - even 7075 alum. cuts like butter, even with a conventional two flute high speed steel endmill. It's hard to even call that roughing, you're not going to push any cutter near it's limits in with that small diameter holder - it's going to chatter first, except possibly in 6061, which is about as tough as marshmallows. We also run high helix parabolic flute endmills - in Solid, large diameter holders.
@TITANSofCNC5 жыл бұрын
There are a million materials and types of tools... I really break it down into 2 sections as standards are concerned. Harvi 3 which was chosen by Boeing over all competitors as the number 1 tool for Titanium... I use that for all steels, titanium, Inconel and Monel etc. But what about soft materials where you need a sharper edge? King of Roughing is actually the name as it’s what KOR stands for and 5 is the flute number. This tool drops 180 cubes with a 1/2 so it definitely out performs all competitors in aluminum etc.
@Motor-City-Mike5 жыл бұрын
@@TITANSofCNC If you say so. We use a lot of half inch 2 and 3 flute streakers (plenty sharp edged), both pocketing and periphery cutting. (Mostly 6061) For pocketing I use a single ramp/plunge to roughing depth - usually 150 - 200% of diameter, use 85 - 90% stepover running 200-220ipm, the biggest issue is chip evacuation even with the high helix - I actually prefer the two flute in pockets for that reason. Periphery, 90% wide 150% deep and all the feed the setup will stand, I ramp over on the first pass to gradually build tool pressure The only limits we see are spindle speed - 8100 max. As an aside - I don't have a lot of respect for Boeing, they're probably much better now (way up there) but I'd seen some poor decisions/endorsements by/from them in the past.
@Motor-City-Mike5 жыл бұрын
@@TITANSofCNC I'm curious, do you have access to spindle rpm, step over and depth of cut when they arrived at 180cu in? Was it a sustained cut or a short/quick pass and then calculated from there? At say 30,000 rpm and 5 flute geometry it doesn't take much chip load per flute to generate that number. I also wonder if it's sustainable, even with the knife edged, cup faced geometry and mirror like micro on the face of the flutes I'd imagine metal transfer to the cutter would limit the amount of time. They're seriously honest questions. "Burst passes" - I don't know the technical term - during high speed machining cycles generate some impressive numbers but the tool life at those numbers in a continuous cut situation intrigues me. I tend to be a bit pessimistic about advertising claims. Just to qualify myself as to the basis behind my questions, I have 40 plus years in the trade, a 2yr. "pedigree" in manufacturing engineering, have been programming 3d/multi-axis since A.P.T. was the industry standard, instruct at the local college, and constantly stay on top of advances in the machinery/tooling/software in our world. The most "significant" machinery I've been responsible for is an 11 axis Nakamura - it was interesting work. If there's something truly significant here in tooling I'd like some verification if you are privy.
@sutryk215 жыл бұрын
Lol. Feed outside the material is lower than in xD