Stefan reveals he's Nikolas's father--Part 2

[@TORI87DEC]

Love Laura & Stefan & Nikolas:)

[@stephaniefaypage8028]

Same

[@karenmartin8894]

They should have left them as father and son

[@skyelochannel]

Stephen Nichols can act, thanks so much.

[@itsjuanderful]

HELL YEAH

[@Cassanrda20]

Awe.....

[@char4him99]

Altho I am die hard Luke and Laura fan-these days however I am happy for Tracy and Luke to be together, I loved the Stefan-Laura-Nikolas story..so much...

[@stephaniefaypage8028]

Me too

[@GaelinW]

The depths of stupidity that the GH writers had to go to move their plots forward. Even they couldn't keep the random stuff they made up straight. In primogeniture succession, the inheritance would have gone to Stefan anyway if Stavros had died without an heir not some random line of cousins. (Hence the saying, "Heir and the spare." Henry VIII was "the Spare". Tsar Nicholas II's father Alexander III was "the Spare". Stefan is "the Spare" here.) How do you think that line of cousins got in line to inherit in the first place, if you didn't go back to the original title/inheritance owner to find the descendants of some second or third or fourth son???! That's the BS that annoyed me about this whole "The Heir" plot. It was an insult to one's intelligence. Moreover, if it was so absolute as contended here, Mikkos couldn't have made a will to change things as he wouldn't had the power to.

[@pb4ugo19]

Agree. These writers....