KSP "Making History" DLC: Saturn V Replica with the new parts!

[@MattLowne]

Lot of people in the comments complaining about how Blue Dog Design Bureau is superior to this DLC. The DLC's focus is not the new parts, it's for the mission builder and new missions. Admittedly the marketing didn't communicate this very well but the parts are really not the focus of the DLC.

[@MrMercaholic75]

Can you link the craft file download please?!

[@MrMercaholic75]

People want DL boi where my DL at boi?!

[@flamingmoose1479]

Watching this video and others has convinced me to buy the DLC. I think everyone was so paranoid about the EULA and having to pay for something after 5 years of free updates that they haven't given it a chance to show its worth.

[@hurzelgnurk]

Yeah thats probably why the parts have switched stats(Wolfhound/J2, offset thrust(Wolfhound etc), fuel flow problems + fairing problems (service module), ultralow CoM of the "MEM" and so on. Or why didnt you use the service module? ;) For the mission builder, it's buggridden to the extent that you can't build anything complex that will work afterwards. Even the stock missions are poorly build and contain horrible mistakes which sometime makes the mission completely broken. I'd still buy it again but I'm a nutjob who would have even paid 30$ (did pay 18$ already because f.. europe) but I expect more at least in terms of quality. A 375kN CSM propulsion is just wrong..

[@L1z43vr]

Please make a tutorial making this Replica

[@huggleton]

“So guys, we did it. We reached a quarter of a million kerbals dead.”

[@futean7693]

YES PYROCINICAL MEME

[@uranusreal5746]

Great

[@baguettefish]

Yeah that's normal, it is the goal of the game...

[@seagotsick]

D:

[@quinceyjohnson6378]

This aged poorly.

[@arizonamidnight5294]

The first minute of the song. My mind: So guys we did it.....

[@mfxkarma]

Yes

[@hetecks1385]

We reached a quarter of a million subscribers

[@cat-ir8rg]

Yes Ww

[@emilianozamora399]

The moment the beat hit I had that play in my head

[@arizonamidnight5294]

@@kombinezonas i apologize

[@AlexanderFeltnerHarrison]

Seeing Jeb parachute from a freefalling command pod is a dream come true

[@lorddashdonalddappington2653]

Wait but wasn't it Bill and Bob who parachuted?

[@sebastianm538]

it was all but one. i forgot who

[@starmada105]

A dream I never knew I had.

[@icantthinkofausername2605]

*Hears background music* So guys, we did it...

[@mfxkarma]

Y e s

[@ttty2242]

we recreated a quarter of a million vehicles in KSP

[@orangemanbad4986]

"So guys, we did it. We reached the moon."

[@Azmythometre]

@SW H You're not serious right

[@jupiterismyhome626]

@SW H Can you explain to me why there star in the sky when it's night time

[@zacksnell2316]

@@Azmythometre what happened

[@dylandavies9553]

R/ wooooosh for most of these comments

[@guywithahoodie7859]

"But we're out of fuel"

[@Spessforce]

I am glad you remembered the Free Return Trajectory! It was very important, and was one of the things that saved Apollo 13.

[@char2c584]

Nickvr 628 "Use the Lunar decent engine to Return to a Free ruturn trajectory"

[@bman7653]

844#1Fan Yes this is correct. Missions post Apollo 11 had mid course corrections to take the CSM/LM out of a FRT to have pinpoint orbits of the Moon to land in specific locations. Apollo 13 blew up after this, and they couldn't use the SPS so the LM descent engine was used to correct back to a FRT

[@char2c584]

Bryan Dunlop I have good Knowledge of The Space Race, except (most) names.

[@bman7653]

844#1Fan I suppose I meant to reply to the parent of your comment. Not doubting knowledge, just expanding so people can know more.

[@badbeardbill9956]

Nah. Apollo 13 was saved by Aquarius and over-engineering. The LM supported the entire crew, albeit with many problems, for the duration of the crisis save reentry.

[@keithcrusader]

MAAAATT! you should recreate the Gemini missions because we now have the Gemini capsule

[@idkhowtoright479]

We do?

[@marthaindahouse1010]

We do

[@t65bx25]

We do

[@GrumpyAlp]

In mother russia there is no I there is only we

[@CoolNinja925]

In mother russia there is no I there is only we

[@deadgiveaway-z3i]

''I decided to actually use the kerbals own personal parachutes'' kerbals: *T-POSE*

[@treyr9]

The flag of Apollo 11 was an American flag, not a NASA flag TRIGGERED

[@mintysushi494]

TreyR9 a comment instead of a like

[@Wirgah]

KASA more like common

[@woodvick8780]

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH TRIGGGGGGGERD

[@mop0014]

I wouldn't want to infect my pc with an American flag.

[@danielmustico008]

TreyR9 there ain’t no merica in KSP

[@KayoMichiels]

4:50 the enormous engine bell isn't because it was made for vacuum.... it was because the contract for it was made before the Lunar rendezvous flightplan was adopted and the engine was supposed to go on the massive lander of the direct ascent flightplan... wihich was canned because of weight and complexity.

[@keithcrusader]

Thank you...

[@LunaNicoleTheFox]

Tho larger engine bells do increase the efficiency of engines in a vacuum.

[@KayoMichiels]

Yes it does, but if the engines was build to the spec it was used on the actual mission, then it would be much smaller.

[@DRfronkensteen]

Uhhh not exactly. Its true the engine was initially designed to be able to land and re-orbit on the moon, but was incorporated into the redesign when they knew the direct ascent was cost prohibitive and dangerous. Size of the bell doesn't necessarily mean bigger engine or more thrust, but it makes certain engines only to be used in vacuum more efficient. Likely the direct ascent version would have had a smaller bell, as a big bell underneath you is more weight you have to lift back up, means bigger landing gear which means more weight, and has a higher risk of being damaged while landing. They likely kept the engine and added the large bell for efficiency when they changed to the orbital rendezvous mission plan.

[@IstasPumaNevada]

Huh, I hadn't known that. Looks like it was about twice the thrust it would have been if it had been designed for LOR from the start. Neat, and thanks.

[@serbianspaceforce6873]

I think it's pretty accurate because I shouted "HEY! That's the Saturn V Rocket!"

[@brokensoap1717]

There is actually a CSM service module part in the DLC which is the proper part to be used on a CSM recreation instead of the fuel tank you used

[@kris_0520]

But it doesn't contain fuel, and there isn't enough space to put a lot of fuel. (Unless you start offsetting parts so they go inside one another.) It is more ideal to put a fuel tank.

[@dann9208]

Nobody asked

[@NHAFFFF]

@@dann9208 since when do you need permission ? Did I not update my KZbin?

[@squidwardtortellini4982]

@@dann9208 well I mean... It IS a sort of overview of the making history expansion so it would have made sense to use that

[@scienceium5233]

@@dann9208 shut up

[@20ola02]

good video but please don't use omfg music

[@MattLowne]

omfg why not

[@mxpph]

overplayed at least turn down the volume :P otherwise great video

[@Pantomas-PG]

Quak Quakkakakakakakakakak Quak ak ak ak akakakakak

[@ZVLIAN]

Ola Østbyhaug yep its overused

[@m2mfox]

he used it in an appropriate manner. it sounds fine unlike the videos you would make dude. chill

[@asasnat342]

also, there's a new service module (in the "Cargo" tab). you can place it on your Saturn V command module instead of a simple fuel tank, and store here all that you needed for flight (Monopropellant for RCS, Liquid Fuel for "Bell" engine, and all other "snacks" you need).

[@aksatshah]

“That’s one small step for Kerman, One giant leap for Kerbalkind.”

[@1bardiel1]

10:06 "Houston, we have a problem !" - "just... mhhh... get out !" xD

[@owenlilley1277]

"Hello" is literally every 5 year old's intro. Luv u Matt!

[@richardsantalone9380]

6:35 that's one small step for Kerman, one giant leap for Kerbalkind

[@deankennedy4645]

Nobody: Me, after they reached the Mun: JUST ONE SMALL STEP FOR KERBAL

[@MRCIVN]

One small step for kerbal,one giant leap for kerbalkind

[@Butterphotography]

I heard this before. Hmmmmmm.....

[@spacepilotmax1112]

Like modern Lego. Fully built parts that are easy to assemble and can only be used for one thing.

[@eldafint]

SpacePilotMax Well the historical stuff yes but there's a lot of new "universal" stuff added too

[@miksuko]

SpacePilotMax can be used for anything*

[@genericserbiandude9111]

Yes! But the Apollo 13 used LM s engines to get back too!

[@Chris_Cross]

Wow... Someone is annoyed...

[@kris_0520]

Chris, i wonder who (not you)

[@neilarmstrong566]

This is some great effort, Good Job Matt.

[@CuteFuzzyWeasel]

couldn't make it past 20 seconds, that music man, Christ! Where did you find that garbage? It sounds like someone trying to use a minion as a bagpipe.

[@dranupmadubey5605]

CuteFuzzyWeasel haha true

[@kerbalpanda3592]

Thats really accurate lmfao

[@salade2760]

r/brandnewsentence

[@endeavor1322]

Lmfao

[@Bruh-fc7ik]

@pyrocynical so guys we did it, we reached a quarter of a million subscribers

[@vincentb5431]

cool and... *good*

[@jolez_4869]

orang no

[@alanmaclaren4118]

*gud*

[@shawnfike2910]

"November 1967"? It was July 1969...

[@lucascb8446]

Saturn V was November 1967

[@cjeppinga]

No it was 1969...

[@lucascb8446]

First flight was 1967

[@MoldySpace]

Runaan's Hurricane first flight was 1967 with Apollo 8. First landing was 1969 Apollo 11. Matt said this was an Apollo 11 recreation.

[@ZaccoOfficial]

The landing was in July 1969

[@nomekop777]

The fact that this thing was capable of going to the moon over 50 years ago blows my mind. Technology has advanced so far since then, but even during the cold war, people were talking about fusion reactors and doing stuff like this. The Saturn V is probably my favorite rocket, aside from Starship

[@maxietheguy2761]

0:00 In my mind: So guys we did it we reached a quarter of a million subscribers

[@getoutofherestalker9652]

Well done

[@influenza3736]

0:57

[@pebbletheheretic]

Nice pyrocynical joke

[@sandrocanais2257]

0:56 so guys we did it a quarter of a million subscribers the fact that we hit such a huge number is just phenomenal

[@saberline152]

1967??!!

[@CountArtha]

You heard it here first - the REAL landing was in 1967 but they faked it in 1969! :P

[@nekdonikde5317]

XD

[@chaoz1666]

I knew I wasn't the only one

[@lemon_png]

CountArtha no no no. The moon is fake, wake up sheep smh.

[@JohnSmith-en9yb]

"November 1967", More like July 1969

[@hayden-ln1li]

I clicked on the video and all I heard was “so guys we did it a quarter of a million subscribers 250000 and still growing the fact we reached this number in a short amount of time is just phenomenal”

[@starguy321]

The free return trajectory is how the Apollo 13 craft got back

[@vegasspaceprogram6623]

Yeah we all know that. But every apollo mission used one just in case

[@jenniferreyes2865]

@@vegasspaceprogram6623 Well no missions after 11 used a free return trajectory encounter with the moon

[@sammyzvlogz4162]

THAT MUSIC HAUNTS MY SOUL

[@spencerott2481]

I’ve been playing for a year and a half and still have no idea how to get an encounter with any planet but the moon or rendezvous.

[@Helperbot-2000]

Same

[@Goonkendall]

Play a different game

[@ZVLIAN]

Matt, you little famous recreater! This Video is great!

[@afrikapanzer4415]

Will you do a voyager style mission,having flyby to Jool and Eeloo before leaving the system?

[@burgerbacon1451]

Can we just appreciate how this nice guy that is a god at ksp and does not ask people to like or subscribe Btw matt love your profile picture:)

[@AzsaturnDx]

How do you change between kerbals in free fall? I keep getting the message: "You can't switch while in atmosphere"

[@Fred_the_1996]

Use [ or ]

[@LnG9]

Love the music man! Can't get enough of it!

[@sunov]

When I told my PS4 friend about this DLC he was so jealous, specifically for this mission

[@macheteman3832]

We finally got moar boosters

[@spacecadetyoutube1716]

Not necessarily the only rocket capable, but certainly the only one that has ever actually done it (the falcon heavy, for example)

[@ZVLIAN]

There is an f1 engine?

[@keithcrusader]

YES

[@SuperDovahKing]

i dont normally comment on videos. but I felt compelled to personally thank you for using OMFG music

[@salvador1769]

hey crey, I just had an amazing idea for a balanced mod mod, even one that could be integrated in the game. I am not a modder so I shout it out in the empty space. 1- allow a change of paint like button to change the Hitchhiker Storage Container into different utilities (garden for food and water distiller for air&water) 2-add a second crew limit to all cabin like parts. -there would be a first limit free of any worries (normal vanilla like) -a second limit at witch the passengers need resources examples: a Mk1-3 Command Pod can contain 3 passengers but could contain 6 for a limited amount of time or if provided with the proper resources. the Hitchhiker Storage Container can normally contain 6, i would propose it contains 3 normally and 6 with resources needs. In fact, think about the big wall-e we like ships we could send into space to colonize jool's system -a humble gamer ps, and please, with all the historical stuff that is going on, I encourage you all to add a mod that oblige you to do your first few flight with a probes. It's so much logical pps, thanks, I really loved the show

[@brampedgex1288]

9:33 for me, the scariest thing is to have your debris you just got rid of go straight for your ship. This happened to me once in Career mode, I decoupled the Kickback thrusters early so they wouldn't damage the engine (I didn't have sepratrons) and instead, after running out of fuel, the 2nd Kickback had less thrust then my launch vehicle, and came straight back to the rocket. There was nothing I could do as it smashed into one of the first stage tail fins mounted above the Mainsail. I was lucky it didn't hit the command pod. From there I disabled the other fins to balance out the rocket, and also had to align the rocket back to it's 45 degree angle before it was too late. I barely made it into an inclined orbit.

[@momosdad7481]

Why is the background music the same as the pyrocynical 250k music “So guys we did it, we reached the moon.”

[@ln5321]

"Neil Armstrong, the 36 year old American, standing on the surface of the moon. On this November 19, 1967."

[@L1z43vr]

how did u build that? And how can we build an Apollo Style Rover in the LEM?

[@macheteman3832]

Your gonna need the robotics dlc. And if you watch the EVA video youll see how its folded up

[@josephhatfield6237]

So matt, you did it. You reached a quarter of a million subscribers.

[@Igor-ug1uo]

What about some Soyuz missions? :)

[@Alasarey]

8:15 he was about to say "If you are not as good as me... " Oh Matt... 😂😂

[@jasonsotelo1234]

The only Apollo’s that had the rovers were everyone after 14

[@lazcentral4828]

So guys, we did it: we reached a quarter of a million subscribers. 250,000 subscribers and still growing. The fact that we’ve reached this number in such a short amount of time is just phenomenal.

[@Bubgun45]

Meh I prefer Realism Overhaul and Rp-0 Sure theirs many mods, longer loading, and need more power than a bad celeron or equivalent cpu and there intergrated gpu If it’s an Intel chip but there’s a lot more parts and fun

[@xcii9215]

Love the exiting music!

[@charlieknight2784]

Is there a craft file for this? Might not be 100% accurate but certainly looks the part!

[@withered8022]

Matt Lowne: *uses so many types of sstos to go to the mun* Also matt lowne: it is the only rocket capable of such a mission

[@wyldcat9396]

He meant the only rocket capable in real life

[@BobtheBuilder0]

Make the Apollo 13 mission with the new mission builder!

[@MrLukas190]

Great Video! Now to Nitpicking, in the Apollo 11 flight, they first made a crash course encounter with the moon and Correct the trajectory after the detached the stage so that minimal waist flys around. But thats just a detail. Non the less great Video keep it up!

[@Tuning3434]

+NudeHolz5 I'm pretty sure Apollo 11's S-IVB stage did perform a free-return trajectory, as it is currently in a heliocentric orbit instead of in pieces on the moon. Apollo 13 was the first stage directed to a collision course on the moon, as did all the other stages afterwards.

[@MajorJimPlays]

Hmmm, the new apollo style parts are ok but it's possible to make far more lifelike looking craft using the older parts. These are more duplo than lego sadly..

[@badbeardbill9956]

Hey there!

[@woutervandenbrand]

On the other side - I don't have 5 days to spend to build a complete Saturn 5 - Apollo mission. I will quite happily give this a go and see if it gets me excited for KSP again ( I haven't played consistently in almost 2 years. Woodzor

[@ZVLIAN]

MajorJim! XD but we have flat parts with colour change!

[@ZVLIAN]

Squiddy one word (combination)... SSTO spaceplanes ......

[@BigMack__]

0:57 So guys we did it we reached a quarter of a million subscribers

[@JuicySalamander]

Reusable Saturn V video maybe???...

[@MrSiamese315]

me watching this: nope, thats not what happened. no that isnt how that was deployed. Matt: see you on wednesday for my non existent series, planet coaster

[@owainderoubaix7183]

Try space shuttle or SLS

[@foodini]

Looking at 3:50 - how do you build that in the VAB? You'd finish making the command module, but then it's only attached to the lower sections by struts and the fairing, both of which have to have their attachment points in place before they can be created.

[@BananaBlaster64]

11:15 he said november 1967 me: NO NO NOOOOOO it was 1969

[@pepsidoggo1598]

@@arya0794 you're a poopy head, do I need to repeat that? *YOU'RE A POOPY HEAD*

[@arya0794]

@@pepsidoggo1598 golden uno reverse card

[@pepsidoggo1598]

@@arya0794 1: that was meant to be an Angry Videogame Nerd reference 2: Platinum Uno reverse card, BIATCH!

[@thomascresswell5365]

The fact we sent ppl to the moon using the processing power of an average smart phone is mental

[@ThomasFarquhar2]

Probably less considering it was the 1960s

[@afoxwithahat7846]

We weren't used to relying on cellphones back in the day

[@foozah43]

0:56 so guys, we did it.

[@lizard474]

its funny how these go up as a huge rocket but come back as a tiny little capsule

[@youngtschakaloff]

How can you never do a proper gravity turn after all this time?

[@badbeardbill9956]

Because it's not really important, especially with such overpowered engines.

[@youngtschakaloff]

Bad Beard Bill im sure he is constantly wasting ~200m/s delta v by half-hovering in the upper atmosphere with 60% thrust like that. Its just stupid.

[@badbeardbill9956]

And he has too much delta-v anyways.

[@youngtschakaloff]

Bad Beard Bill its just not elegant

[@squeakychickengamer7911]

Thank you Matt, you kerbal engineering genius

[@xDarkMonkeyz]

I dont have any hate or problem about DLC but this Ins't a bit useless when there mod who do a way better replica.. For free

[@Jognt]

The advantage of having it made by the devs would be better stability and integration, and experience as a whole. Like if a modder did it you would for example end up with a new 2.5m crew capsule with RCS thrusters built in while still having the no-rcs mk2 and mk3 spaceplane noses. What's that? They didn't go the extra few meters to upgrade those? Oh bollocks. Well, at least it's more stable... What do you mean it's still bugged? Really? Still. Even if you ignore the tanks/engines, the DLC still is very valuable because of the physics rewrite that allows it to run on GPUs. Oh, they didn't, it's still the same single thread CPU driven physics. >.< Yeah I don't know what they were thinking either.

[@ZVLIAN]

xDarkMonkeyz but with the dlc you have the sake of a "stock" game

[@michaelfarrell4824]

Main point of the DLC is the mission builder

[@mossthatrules77]

When the game updates you don't have to wait a month for the mod to update, so there's that.

[@Scoffslaphead72]

@@Jognt is slightly better stability and some crappy mission builder worth £12 though?

[@ballisticfox9033]

Amazing that Scott Manley isn’t here complaining

[@nuclearwarhead9338]

Soyuz replica next please)))

[@miksuko]

Why the random closing parentheses??

[@choplamarsdog1795]

Ok, so this guy can built a frickin saturn v replicas while I don't even know how to orbit. Nice

[@johnroach8508]

As an American I’m extremely offended that you used the NASA flag and not the American flag. I shall now continue to complain loudly while eating McDonald’s, and roll my 600lbs husk back to the bed.

[@ussarizonabb-3993]

0:29 NASA’s new SLS rocket will also be capable to go to the moon and is my favorite rocket but as an American the Saturn V will always have a place in my heart

[@Mustang_2137]

Is this DLC paid?

[@justinkoshy1236]

Zero Skilla Sam Fart Yeah 15 USD unless you bought ksp in 2013

[@blaes7460]

yes.

[@nqvy_4546]

@Fraston Calm down.. Jeez..

[@carriezisman7871]

Matt: some fo you aren’t as experienced, so if you’re bad at rendezvous then maybe don’t download the craft Me: I can’t even orbit kerbin

[@HaydenCMH]

omfg this music is so obnoxious ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[@AlphaGametauri]

Nice looking capsules and stuff, can't wait for the ASET replacement mod for it.

[@Jognt]

15 bucks for bigger tanks and new engines! Where do I sign up?! /sarcasm (I've ignored the mission builder because frankly, telling your community "well, here's a tool, go do it yourself" isn't much of a feature as it is a slap in the face)

[@Jognt]

And you'll have experienced most of them quite quickly after which you're left with the same feeling as before "now what?". Sure, you can say "It's a sandbox game", but that doesn't mean there's no demand for a sense of direction/achieving something. (or a demand for a physics engine that can run on GPUs for example) Hell, they didn't even give the Mk2 and Mk3 spaceplane parts the same honor as the 2.5m command pod (usable RCS instead of a decal). They literally did the least amount of effort to be able to say "well, here's something".

[@michaelfarrell4824]

Yeah minecraft failed as a product by telling peoples to create their own game worlds

[@michaelfarrell4824]

Also KSP sucks as they make you build your own spaceship instead of just providing them for us

[@ElixirEdits]

@Michael Farrell You do know that there's sandbox mode, right? And there's pre-made crafts. Also Minecraft didn't fail lol. It's literally the second most sold video game of all time.

[@michaelfarrell4824]

Obvious sarcasm meet random internet commenter..... Random internet comment meet obvio....... Oh never mind

[@joshuagraham2762]

“So guys we did it, we reached a quarter of a million kerbals left in random orbits!”

[@Conner-bq1gy]

Download link for the rocket?

[@pancytryna9378]

It's in DLC

[@igorschmidlapp6987]

1st stage separation and second stage ignition timing seems too quick. Program problem, or replay speed?

[@agurich8013]

Kinda alternative apollo 13 if the chutes didnt deploy at the end there 🤔🤔🤔 (if the astronauts did have kerbal chutes 😂😂😂)

[@foundationsoversight8479]

My great-grandfather worked on this rocket irl. True, I swear.

[@misterjuicypear]

Cool!

[@cameronluce]

Is the DLC free?

[@jesusramirezromo2037]

Cameron Luce Not unless you bougth KSP pre-2013

[@squeakychickengamer7911]

Cameron Luce I think it's free for people who bought the game before March 2012. Otherwise you have to pay. That might not be the case but I remember when Squad first mentioned a DLC they said something along those lines.

[@cameronluce]

SqueakyChickenGamer ok thanks

[@cameronluce]

Jesus Ramirez Romo ok thanks

[@justinkoshy1236]

Cameron Luce 15 USD

[@Klayperson]

I just completed my first real Mun landing, and I built my own Apollo style mission mashed with some of the Russian parts (the Voskod capsule and the boosters to get off kerbin), but I used the Mk1 lander can ( I cheesed some extra capabilities in it by clipping fuel, a reaction wheel, Sas module and battery) -- and even with all that, I still failed to leave enough fuel for the ascent from the munar surface to get back into orbit. So I yeeted Bob up to the 11km apogee that I could achieve, EVAd, grabbed all the science, and used his jetpack to get into a 40km orbit that my command module could intercept. But that's not all: when I touched down on kerbin, I got both crew out (Valentina and Bob) and then I tried to get Bob back inside, but the door was too high. So I thought I'd roll the capsule over to get the door lower... It worked, but only after I had to chase the damn thing down the grassy planes on foot for about a kilometer or two. And I left the science inside. I was so worried it was going to hit a bump and blow up lmaooooo

[@Luminite-hx3zs]

Plz use your original music, don't use this crap. I'm sorry but it's so overrated and bad.

[@thewackfack8797]

that intro music gave me memories of 2014 that i didnt know i had

[@lukasaldersley8056]

How did you make the walls of the capsule transparent at 11:39 ?

[@collinmagee6375]

LMAO just looked up matt with out knowing he uploaded and found out he posted less then 3 minutes

[@xeon6038]

I now officially have my first satellite in orbit and since its core is a Soyuz I have called it *motherland*-*1*

[@zach_lullfrominstagram]

At 0:57 “so guys we did it, we hit a quarter of a million subscribers”

[@oatmeal42]

So guys, we did it. We reach a quarter of a million DeltaV. 250,000 DeltaV and still growing. The fact that we reached so many in such a small amount of fuel is truly amazing.

[@taylorbroad8941]

Good video. Heads up though, your trajectory overall required more dV as you put yourself into a prograde orbit around the Mun instead of a retrograde one. For a proper orbit, you're basically making a figure 8 in between Kerbin and the Mun. Think the Apollo 8 flight patch.

[@j0gski]

0:34 NASA's Upcoming SLS Moon Rocket: *I am more powerful than you*

[@ianmoore7000]

So guys we did it, a quarter of a million subscribers and still growing.

[@haraldlindohf4032]

I remember in earlier versions when kerbals would just bounce when falling from high altitude

[@floppydonkeyste]

I think Apollo missions took a retrograde orbit around the moon? (or am I wrong?)