This will be my 80th year behind the camera. I started filmmaking in 1946 with the 16mm Bell & Howell Autoload, as many did. I ended my career with a few documentaries for airlines and travel lecture business, which was killed by televison eventually. Stanley Kubrick is one of my heroes. Rembrandt ground his own pigments. Kubrick practiced the same fanatical attention to detail that made him famous. No, a tool is not just a tool. A superb, ingenious tool like a lens can enable you to share your inner vision and so enrich the whole experience of the visual arts. RIP Maestro!
@arricammarques19552 жыл бұрын
Peerless sense of composition & focal lengths.
@MuffinMan1013 жыл бұрын
This is the history that I want to learn
@sangeovr2 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@ferabra89398 жыл бұрын
That's why Kubrick's movies are the best looking ever (and probably why they took so long to shoot). He probably tried everything until he was totally satisfied with a shot, in a process similar to that of a great painter more than a filmmaker.
@dj_bullets71067 жыл бұрын
Fer Abra I notice one of the distinct stylistic decisions in his shots is small groupings of people sitting in certain places in the background and sometimes in focus. This reminds me very much of some paintings. His approach was definitely influenced by painters pressumably renaissance.
@ferabra89397 жыл бұрын
Samuel J. On Barry Lyndon definitely. But every movie he made was so vastly different from the previous one that it's difficult to say exactly what his influences were. Depends on the movie, really. There can't be two more stylistically different movies than Clockwork Orange and Barry Lyndon. One pop art influenced, and the other 18th century art influenced...And yet, both are unmistakably Kubrick, the mark of a great artist.
@dj_bullets71067 жыл бұрын
Fer Abra Absolutely every one the movies are very different yet similar. The style I'm referring to is particularly prominent in his films post "Lolita" He had extras propped about on the set, mostly in interiors, in often very intentional pose... like in paintings or photography. It's definitely used a lot in Lyndon. It adds an air of surrealism imo, dreamlike, very filmic.
@ferabra89397 жыл бұрын
Samuel J. I never noticed! I have to check that out. His movies are closer to art than entertainment. You keep noticing details even if you saw them 20 times, and they are never boring.
@pacochuquiure78077 жыл бұрын
As a profesional photographer myself I find this guide amazing.
@CeruleanFilms7 жыл бұрын
This guy and Dan Sasaki are probably the two most respected lens technicians alive. Joe Dunton actually built his own line of cinema lenses that were used a lot in the '80s (including Return of the Jedi).
@gordonm.73877 жыл бұрын
+CeruleanFilms JDC Scope. Blue Velvet was also shot in it.
@arricammarques19554 жыл бұрын
Film focal lengths, optics are far superior.
@EyesOnCinema8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the re-upload of my video!
@laurapererasanmartin49007 жыл бұрын
Hi! I can't find the original video on your channel... And I wanted to know who is the author of this, just to write the good reference in my thesis ;) Thanks! (By the way: very interesting video!)
@caivsivlivs7 жыл бұрын
so you didn't even make the video? lol
@rossbain9915 жыл бұрын
how is this your video?
@jackwhite704 жыл бұрын
I worked for a lighting company that had it’s own studio in west London, I started for the company after coming out the army. Any way that’s by & by, in a little corner of the yard was where joe operated his Camra department, at this time joe didn’t have much transport, so as a favour, on delivering our film lights to other studios, we would take Joe’s Camra gear with us, and I must say 50 years on you would never be lucky enough to meet a more genuine person. I went on to work on many major movies, and would run into joe here there, and he never changed on but an absolute gentleman/ jack white
@charlesteton Жыл бұрын
Joe Dunton, had a rental house as well, was the man to see in those days, as well as Optex and Sammies. I shot my first feature film in 1984, Dark Summer, as writer/producer/director/DOP/editor on an Arri 2c, 60% of the time it was blimped (an 80lb caste iron jacket that enclosed the camera to stop the noise of motor and film). It was a zero budget film, film stock came out of a skip but we tested every roll before using. It was one of only two films shot in anamorphic 35mm SuperScope that year in UK. Film was theatrically release in UK and ended up being distributed and sold through Mel Gibson’s Company Icon and Majestic. The rushes and prints were done at Rank Laboratories, thanks to Chester Eire, the technicians used to call me Little Kubrick, as I was such a pan in the arse about my rushes and prints, they were all step printed! That name was not a complement! 😂
@ronaldcollins78395 жыл бұрын
Thanks Joe for an excellent presentation I and mentioning motion picture lens engineer George Hill of the Optex company
@truefilm15567 жыл бұрын
Awesome stuff! It is very obvious that Kubrick also knew how his lenses behaved with certain camera movements - and how the different film stocks "printed" the image (and things that go way beyond my knowledge). Totally love this top notch custom engineering approach combined with true art (hand the same gear to another great cinematographer: it won't be the same) - the jaw dropping results speak for themselves. Kubrick was a genius. Thanks for this upload!
@sidharthgoutam16344 жыл бұрын
@truefilm can someone give me an insight of what lenses did he used for "Dr.Strangelove (WAR Room scene).
@thomaslocke81144 жыл бұрын
Sidharth Goutam the Stanley Kubrick exhibition catalogues says he used a ooke Speeds Panchro set, with a 14.5mm Angénieux and a 28mm Schneider.
@thomaslocke81144 жыл бұрын
Sidharth Goutam sorry, I meant Cooke Speeds, forgot the “C”, haha
@mishtaromaniello82956 жыл бұрын
1:17 I just love that transition of showing small lenses to a fucking huge zoom lens, XD
@neilpiper98894 жыл бұрын
Cooke were excellent lens designers copied by many, including Leica for their first Elmar still camera lens. I use Schneider Componon S lenses for my still darkroom enlargers. Awesome. Very interesting video. Thank you.
@Forrteroi4 жыл бұрын
2:57 "His favourite lens on this camera was an 18mm.." Subtitles: *19mm* You had one job!
@classeswithnajmahaque11034 жыл бұрын
you have a great eye
@Muffinlicioification3 жыл бұрын
funnily enough it does kinda sound like he says nineteen
@AbdallahBotan2 жыл бұрын
Yep, One job man.
@thefilmandmusic6 жыл бұрын
This is fascinating.. it would be great to see examples after every lense . Do you lecture at Frankfurt ? I was there, but it was closed an amazing red lit building ... thanks
@johndeggendorf78265 жыл бұрын
Great content, man. Thanks for this.
@supercine357 жыл бұрын
Sehr schöne Dokumentation. Da tuen sich Parallelen auf: Wie Stanley Kubrick habe ich eine Arriflex IIc, Cooke Speed Panchros, Zeiss Super Speeds und viele der anderen vorgestellten Optiken. Und ich bin nur Hobbyfilmer.
@atomicdancer7 жыл бұрын
What type of lens does Len Kabasinski use? There was some very unconventional camera work used in his classic film 'Skull Forest.' I really liked those scenes where all the actors were out of focus, but the trees in the background were crystal clear. So, does anyone know which one is Len's lens?
@TARAJOSU7 жыл бұрын
I loved watching this. Get's the gears in my mind going. Thanks for posting this!
@joanespina23927 жыл бұрын
Grande Kubrick!...Gracias por tu otra mirada
@nouvelle-punk5 жыл бұрын
This is really interesting, thanks!
@iseeolly99594 жыл бұрын
After 3 years of doing a degree in Film Studies....my Dissertation was "Stanly Kubrick's use of the Colour Red".............it went right over their heads...and the Don of my college couldn't understand it. I dunno what to make of Stanley.....he was made from different stock, ......I can only compare him to cammile pissarro.....and this mans lens knowledge is breathtaking and I actually cried a little bit.....I love art and film.
@arricammarques19552 жыл бұрын
35mm SLR + various focal lengths.
@paulstreet59827 жыл бұрын
Thank you Joe!
@Oceansta4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. What a truly mad genius!
@matonmongo4 жыл бұрын
Amazing, thx! Has there ever been any other 'auteur' filmmaker who not only wrote and directed his own work, but was even his own cinematographer, and he was obviously a very sophisticated 'techie' well before Lucas did Star Wars!
@jimstirling72238 жыл бұрын
Great video thank you
@forcedadventure8 жыл бұрын
GREAT VIDEO !!!
@Zamfarafilms6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this upload
@jaydipbiswas43874 жыл бұрын
Sir Stanley Kubrick is an institution, Sir Andrei Tarkovsky too.
@mkphotofilm2 жыл бұрын
He really loved his wide lenses. What a legend!
@Thespeedrap4 жыл бұрын
This is a great video I wish I could find some good film lenses for my movies.
@jimpickard38507 жыл бұрын
astonishing
@Delphisteve5 жыл бұрын
I understand color consistency is very important in video work... considering the vast difference in lenses it must of been difficult keep the colour consistent
@CraigMansfield6 ай бұрын
I don't take photos anymore, but I still love my lenses and I won't sell them. I always had a thing with lenses, not the images
@carltoncotter26144 жыл бұрын
Bravo! Thank you.
@lordtherapeutics2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful, thank you!
@mattyjwalks6 жыл бұрын
25-500mm? Are you shitting me? The aperture looked fixed as well?! Holy fucking shit! Insane!
@MrPhotodoc4 жыл бұрын
The Arriflex 2c, Stanley's personal camera, is right now on eBay. No shit.
@jhjhjhjhjhjhify2 жыл бұрын
Don't see many authentic zoom shots in many films nowadays. The ones in Barry Lyndon are beautiful.
@andrewglover98748 жыл бұрын
Very interesting!
@HelpUsSaveLives4 ай бұрын
Great video
@kylelittle60504 жыл бұрын
Stanley is such a boss
@thekaiser43334 жыл бұрын
A lens-list in the description would be nice.
@JimiJames3 жыл бұрын
Where does this interview live, for which film was this a supplement?
@JanPBtest6 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately we didn't get to see the "HAL's eye" lens. IIRC it was a weird Fairchild-Curtis lens, I saw it on eBay about 20 years ago, it sold for a large sum, it was still mounted in one of HAL's panels. Have no idea who owns it now, that's probably why this lens was not on the Kubrick exhibit, the "HAL's eye" there was replaced with a Nikon lens.
@CeruleanFilms5 жыл бұрын
The lens in the HAL faceplate was a Nikkor Fisheye 8mm. It was there as a prop only, with a red light behind it. The fisheye lens they used for the actual POV shots would have been something else. The Nikkor was made for 35mm and would have produced only a small circle on the 65mm film.
@CeruleanFilms6 жыл бұрын
That last one is actually a 90mm, not a 19mm.
@CeruleanFilms5 жыл бұрын
He says 90mm, I'm just pointing out the subtitles have it wrong.
@johnaugsburger61923 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much
@ArcadesKF6 жыл бұрын
super le reportage
@PointyTailofSatan3 жыл бұрын
I heard that Zeiss would send new lens designs to Kubrick for his feedback. Not sure if this is true.
@AntoniosPapantoniou3 жыл бұрын
"ok, send me please ten 135mm Zeiss lenses and I'll let you know which one I'll keep" _ it can't get more Kubrick than that
@Valkonnen3 жыл бұрын
And the Production pays for every one of them, which he keeps afterward. Peter Jackson started Weta Digital that way too. He Bought a couple of Silicon Graphics workstations and a 35mm film printer for "Heavenly Creatures" and kept them for other things.
@edvenuto96143 жыл бұрын
A 9.8 mm is really wide. Like a fisheye lens. He know how to direct his camera and lenses are what make his films great.
@tlatosmd Жыл бұрын
Sorry, but a rectilinear ultra-wide angle lens is definitely not the same as a fisheye. The question is whether straight lines stay straight.
@drknsss173 жыл бұрын
The eyebrows on this geeza are epic!!!!!
@ericcoen88944 жыл бұрын
All the focal length mentioned in this video is about to use on s35 camera, right? Which means that the real full frame equivalent should be x1.5 crop factor?
@girayizcan63574 жыл бұрын
Cinema has traditionally been Academy 35 and then s35 especially with tv work. Full frame that new people refer to is Vista Vision format or 8 perf photography which is the equivalent of 35mm stills. Digital people got used to Vista Vision with 5d cameras which became the norm for digi people. Traditionally speaking, cinema was always flat 35 or s35 except for some 65 and vistavision photography films.
@flyingfox20052 жыл бұрын
The reliance on full frame as a reference point is purely a modern fad. The "real" focal lengths on any camera system is what is written on the side of the lens. You should not call a 35mm motion picture lens by the focal length you'd used on a FF / 135 stills camera to match AOV. Full frame equivalents aren't "focal lengths" - simply comparative angle of views. Cinema for 90% of its existence has been 3 or 4 perf film (or a sensor of a similar size) ... that is 35mm motion picture film. 8 perf (VistaVision) is close to the frame size of a "full frame" DSLR is simply a different format. You uses lenses 1.5x longer on FF / 135 (compared to S35) for the same AOV. But a 35mm lens on S35 "is" a 35mm lens... it's completely inaccurate to call it a 50mm lens.
@Statuskuo757 жыл бұрын
Kilfit lenses are underrated.
@sebastienmoal95873 жыл бұрын
Merci. C'est passionnant. Je crois qu'il y a une erreur de traduction : "prime lens" = focale fixe.
3 жыл бұрын
a proper nerdy presentation
@jackbarron88802 ай бұрын
What about his photography lenses?
@nicktosti74877 жыл бұрын
What does he mean by "cinema frame" and "film frame" at 7:46?
@giodc85997 жыл бұрын
Film frame is 35mm where as cinema might be 8 or 16 mm. Thus lenses can get smaller and closer to the film.
@nicktosti74877 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@CeruleanFilms7 жыл бұрын
"Cinema frame" means 35mm motion picture film (vertical, 4-perf), rather than 35mm still photograph film (horizontal, 8-perf). Dunton brings this up because Kubrick used a lot of lenses that were originally made for still photography.
@arricammarques19554 жыл бұрын
@@CeruleanFilms requires a P-Mount, for cinema cameras.
@felixcat43463 жыл бұрын
Where's the POV fisheye used for Hal?
@BatteryExhausted6 жыл бұрын
Problem with being an indie film maker is that good lenses cost more than my car. I wonder how much Kubrick spent on all that glass?
@fra91_6 жыл бұрын
they are obviously expensive, we re talking about hundreds of thousands of dollars but believe me, if you are a very talented film maker, lenses don't really matter because even when he did't have that, you could still say he was one of the greats if not the greatest. it's all about the vision
@jockoadams33776 жыл бұрын
The irony is the bigger, richer, and more famous a filmmaker you become... the more people will just give things to you. There was a story about Kubrick asking the head of Warner Bros. (John Calley) for a couple of the remaining old studio cameras (I believe one of them he had modified for Barry Lyndon). Well, the studio chief obliged and gave them to Stanley, not aware that they were no longer produced, almost one of a kind and nearly priceless.
@VilkanVisions6 жыл бұрын
Those still lenses are not that expensive at all :) he just used what he needed, now you can find much more variety of good lenses for less money.
@Lospollos245 жыл бұрын
Vilkan Visions tf you talking about with your dumbass
@arricammarques19554 жыл бұрын
Visit a camera rental house. Talk with the equipment manager, rent a lens kit., various focal lengths.
@sclogse12 жыл бұрын
So, why is it when they shot the large Discovery model in a camera pass, with an aperature of f64, that there was no diffraction that the rest of us get when shooting at f16?
@relaxandbreathe13282 жыл бұрын
Did he just said Nasa project in a video about stanley kubrick?
@rafaellemieszekpinheiro46278 жыл бұрын
Julian Assange's dad sure knows his lenses
@catfishhunter96423 жыл бұрын
I like the one he did the fake moon landing with..
@bigpardner8 жыл бұрын
Why would what he calls a "deep field" lens have any more DOF than another lens of similar quality with same focal length at same aperture? How could you make any lens have more DOF other than optimizing the formulas for best performance at smaller apertures?
@danielbelik7 жыл бұрын
Maybe because those lens designed for smaller frame size? Than smaller frame we use, than deeper DOF we have.
@flyingfox20052 жыл бұрын
@@CeruleanFilms no it's not - there's no such thing as "built in cropfactor". Crop factor is a tool to let you compare angle of view across formats. The 100mm deep field panchro is a 100mm - I have one sat on my desk.
@flyingfox20052 жыл бұрын
The Cooke 100mm Deep Field Panchro offers a deeper depth field at the same Tstop - compared to the previous non-coated Cooke lenses of the same range - specifically the Cooke 100mm f2 (T2.8) The Cooke Double Speed Panchro had a smaller aperture of f2.5 but the same tstop of T2.8. This is because the lens had better light transmission between elements... due to newly designed lens coatings. So the Double Speed Panchro has at a stop of f2.5 (compared to f2 on the older lens) resulting in a deeper depth of field - while maintaining the same light transmission of T2.8
@dizmix7 жыл бұрын
Wait... What NASA projects?
@mr.grumpyface5277 жыл бұрын
David Lopez - Leica or zeiss (can't remember which one) made lenses for the astronauts to use on the apollo missions. Kubrick managed to get his hands on some and had them modified to fit his Arriflex. They were extremely fast lenses. Probably the same or similar to the lenses used by Buzz and Neil during apollo 11.
@Cybjon6 жыл бұрын
Zeiss. They were super fast Hasselblad lenses. And it was a specially adapted Mitchell camera, not his Arriflex.
@canturgan7 жыл бұрын
Did he use anamorphic lenses?
@gordonm.73877 жыл бұрын
Spartacus was shot in Technirama horizontal 8 perforation frame with a 1.5x squeeze. 2001 was 65mm spherical Super Panavision.
@canturgan7 жыл бұрын
Gordon M. Thanks for the update.
@arricammarques19554 жыл бұрын
Anamorphic aspect ratio used for widescreen cinematography.
@sclogse12 жыл бұрын
That last lens..a 90mm.
@abrarqadir5034 жыл бұрын
this guys kinda adorable
@chenomestrano37045 жыл бұрын
sub ita?
@kendunton14 жыл бұрын
Yay! Long lost relation...
@Whisky_Tango_Foxtrot-jc5uq2 жыл бұрын
Correct the lenses do make the pictures. They are your paintbrush to your pallet.
@raveleando5 жыл бұрын
NASA WHAT?
@mishtaromaniello82956 жыл бұрын
8:26 How rude.
@AntoniosPapantoniou3 жыл бұрын
things got out of hand
@cmmmmmmmw8 жыл бұрын
he sounds like he's going to cry
@PhoenixWright1016 жыл бұрын
He's nervous, obviously.
@camorinbatchelder65145 жыл бұрын
He misses Stanley. : )
@robinmay87257 жыл бұрын
how many times did he say lens? all jokes aside great video!
@oneeyedjacks22155 жыл бұрын
Fresnel Crater Apollo Moon Landing area Crater Fish with one Fish Eye lens stuck in its eye socket in a glass display Case. " Great Party" Scene The Shining Moon Shots Fish Eye used in every scene of 2001 ASOdyssey Candle Light NASA Spy Satellite Lens borrowed Jack Be Nimble Jack be Quick FASTEST Lens made. LOL! Very clever. Super Zoom Lens Barry Linden this is used in Flat Earth Proofs P900, P1000 He is using Lenses to communicate his message. Nikor Ultra Wide Angle Destructively modified camera 2001 A Space Odyssey In the Kubrick Museum. Galileo Hammer Fether drop. Galileo is credited with perfecting the Telescope. We can see way way way too far if we lived on a Blue Marble Telescopes blow your Balls off. You can see for miles and miles an miles oh yeah.
@arricammarques19552 жыл бұрын
Ultra wide angle-cine lenses.
@umeng20026 жыл бұрын
... and today we have Cape-shit.
@matttttt3o3 жыл бұрын
where's this canon 35mm1.4 hiding ? there's no trace on the web ???
@carmentavarez71467 жыл бұрын
Who Israel this guy.?
@sivasankarvisayan54037 жыл бұрын
Carmen Tavarez best question in the world. Who's Israel is he?
@lukegraftonnash83577 жыл бұрын
Did he just admit the NASA Freud ?
@garyking40327 жыл бұрын
Nope. Lowlight lenses were needed in space because it's dark. It's not rocket science. Doh... I guess it is.
@lukegraftonnash83577 жыл бұрын
Yea very funny
@arricammarques19552 жыл бұрын
@@garyking4032 Modified NASA lens for 35mm BNC Mitchell.
@phonotical5 жыл бұрын
Bollocks
@superheaton4 жыл бұрын
Nice lenses. Also, they killed Kubrick before the release of eyes wide shut revealing secretive elite society and their orgasm scene.