Landmark Cases: Season Two Debuts at the National Constitution Center (HD)

[@haridasmaulloo9087]

I am a citizen of Mauritius, a tiny island that has a history very similar to that of the USA. The big difference between our 2 countries is not the size, but the way in which our constitutions differ. Your authors were real geniuses, probably as inspired as a Newton or an Einstein. Thank you for opening this treasure to people like me, so physically remote, yet so intellectually same. I am preparing to start law school at the age of 56. The NCC broadcast is my main motivator. A million thanks!

[@laurabartoletti6412]

🇺🇸⚖ RBG Rest In Power, Rest In Peace ⚖🇺🇸

[@edriquez57]

If theses guy are lawyers I trust them as far as I could throw them ! First thing out of his mouth is our Democracy ! What happened to our Republic ! !

[@owlnyc666]

Is this the same as "part 2"?

[@owlnyc666]

From DIFFERENT perspectives! 🤔😉😏😊 New Textualism--Originalism for Liberals.

[@rsr789]

You have two professors that come at the constitution from two completely different political and interpretive views. Seriously, what are you complaining about??

[@ericperry3638]

The guy in the back ground clearing his throat when they give up important information about themselves and C-SPAN helping guide their opinions, which is very scary. Now that was a good joke.

[@ericperry3638]

1more thing. I'm sorry. Did you hear this guy say, he has a rap about, and other guy said do it. I just wonder how these gentleman feel about the way the Constitution is being used by both political parties. What constitutional rights will your grandchildren have. Good question.

[@euphegenia]

8:05 "This will be a constitutional feast". Perhaps a poor choice of words when speaking about the Supreme Court. Didn't work out well for Robert Bork.

[@rajbalamsharma3300]

Nanabhai Palkivala senior advocate legal expert lost moral qualities acting within implied bounds of British colonialism judiciary collegium system incorporated temporarily in article 50 in constitution granted authorisation for time being not for 75years should be revoked by President of India. DY Chandra chur chief Justice Supreme Court appointed by collegium system epitome of disqualification, incompleteness beyond interpretation capabilities and control 5 crore backlog cases pending and 17-18 lakh under trial prisoners enfringement of rights of people victims of atrocities exploitation and corruption exposed from PIL N0 224 0f 2017 on 10.07.2017 with chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired unfit Anti democracy rebelious debates threats to sovereignty of India appointed by collegium system alien rules of laws British colonialism judiciary Anti India disloyality and disaffection incited people for confrontational activities against sovereignty of India superseding preamble of constitution unless cancellation of authorizations temporarily granted in 1950.in constitution without overhauling rejecting overhauling proposal of professor KT Shah member of constitutional drafting committee.