This Siphon Works But not for Long

This is the last update on the silly siphon. I install the foot valve and the ball valve to get the unit primed with water. After much work I managed to get some water out the top but the best results were only a little over 35 seconds. I am comfortable saying that this siphon idea is busted.
Ram Pumps available on AMAZON
amzn.to/2EWrQHN
Also available on Land To House Website:
www.landtohouse.com/rampumpsales
Help Support land To House by Paypal:
paypal.me/landtohouse
Send Mail to Land To House:
Land To House llc
P.O. Box 323
Micaville, NC 28755
See whats coming up before it hits KZbin on my Facebook Page:
/ landtohouse
Land To House is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com

[@ernestoortiz6489]

If you didn't use PVC glue the joints will leak air. I think it needs to be air tight to make and maintain pressure.🤔

[@user-yf3uw2sj5l]

the concept works. As a youth I worked on an arizona farm where irrigation water flowed through open concrete canals for waterings the ranches. We used heavy rubber pipes about 5 feet long, that naturally curved because they came on huge spools, and 4 in diameter. To get the water flowing, you thrust one end of the pipe into the water and as far as you could, then immediately cap your hand over the top of the pipe and draw the pipe up but not out of the water. Its sorta like sucking on a straw, but instead you just stop the water from running out the bottom by caping your hand over the top. When this is done fast enough, you cause a flow of water that flows up and over the edge of the canal and onto the rows of crops. The flowing water in the canal has a lot to do with the physics. We would do hundreds in a couple of hours. The competition was who could get the water flowing with the least amount of strokes.

[@RA-rf4nz]

My grandfather used the exact same technique out in a cabbage field and tried to teach me how to do it when I was 5 or 6 yo back in 1960's. I could not do it be he could do it with about 3 or 4 strokes. As I can recall the curved pipe was about a 1 inch diameter (maybe it was 1.5 in?) and about 4 ft long.

[@faletiute]

thank you for trying out, it was lovely to watch and learn. To be logic, the pressure chamber shall be 1/2 the length of the water chamber so that the pressure build inside the pressure chamber is proportional to the length of the water chamber * 0.5, and the height of the outlet pipe should not exceed the height that it will build a gravitational pressure that equal or close to the pressure builds inside the pressure chamber, otherwise both the pressure inside the pressure chamber + the weight of water at the top half of the water chamber will be lower, but it should be higher in order for that kind of system to work. anyway, thanks again for the video

[@georgemaze7926]

Your the best, thanks for making this video. Don't never get up.

[@yeroxa]

Thx for experimental video. Moscow watching!

[@jllaine]

too cool, results as expected.

[@LandtoHouse]

Yes just as expected!

[@AboveandBeyond44]

And now back to our regularly scheduled program. 😄👍

[@MrLarryHolden]

I would be very interested in a 55 gal drum siphon from a pond to provide delivery water to one of your ram pumps

[@GadsdenLiveDotCom]

You invested considerable amount of time money and effort to debunk this. THANK YOU!!!

[@zwuck8151]

Thanks for telling true words

[@ttfweb1]

With the outlet much higher than the intake, input and output volumes the same - no matter what gyrations occur in closed system in between, it ain’t gonna work. Nice video.

[@hunkt2980]

Thank you very much

[@user-eg4qe9lr1m]

Crazy presentation

[@vidlubin5748]

I knew this wouldn't work. These guys are scammers 😂

[@wolfyeps]

Thank you

[@ufolaoguy5240]

good job

[@Schneiw]

Plot twist: The guy you speak of owns a PVC pipe manufacturer, trying to get those sales up :P

[@LandtoHouse]

Haha I would not be surprised!

[@lezbriddon]

more validity in that idea than any of the uphill syphon videos, its the latest version of perpetual motion for view count

[@user-xv9xw7vs3h]

THANKS!

[@alloydog613]

Damn! I saw the video you mentioned and thought, "I'll watch that. It's just what I need at the cabin!" Then I saw your video. Back to carrying buckets from the river, then.

[@LandtoHouse]

If you have head pressure or water drop definitely check out the ram pump.

[@reginr]

THANK YOU~~~~~~~~~

[@ScienceMadeFunner]

Wow thank you very much for the video! A lot of guys will just try and debunk things without even testing it. You go the extra mile and I appreciate that good sir!

[@Emulation_Inflation]

Sweet!

[@Dherreiros]

Everything is ok what you did, the trick is the water will be in movement, what you need is to build up water flow, without constant flow, nothing works.

[@agung_id1588]

Terimakasih 🙏👍 Karena sudah mempraktekkan, dan ternyata gagal 🙏👍

[@9krishbhoir734]

Thanks

[@dennispowers7404]

Kinda curious if the stand pipe after the pressure chamber was shorter, albeit, it may run a little longer but not much. Or even straight out from the pressure chamber with no vertical lift.

[@kjellg6532]

Or simply drop al that fancy nonsense? A simple hose will do the trick, no funny chambers and pressure.

[@darkwarrior1588]

as i said in the previous video, the guy does perpetual energy videos. theyre an artist at concealment and misdirection. i would say his system had a rubber coupling under the water, he uses the pump to stir muck and cloud to hid the pump. then he sticks the end in the coupling and acts as if the pvc is doing it. the flow rate just doesnt make sense.

[@buggsy5]

Yep. The fraudster's only purpose is to gull the gullible into clicking on his fake devices. There are many other such frauds out there.

[@sfcar]

If you ran air tubes through the top and partially down the length of the first larger pipe, wouldnt it be like a trompe?

[@edschultheis9537]

The only reason why any water is running out of the outlet is because you are putting work (pumping energy) into the system by shaking the one-way valve at the input pipe. That energy is further stored in the large capped-off tube as increased air pressure (above atmospheric pressure). This is potential energy. When the outlet valve is opened, the small amount of stored potential energy in the slightly-pressurized capped-off tube pushes the water through the valve and out of the outlet tube. Once the air pressure in the capped-off tube reaches atmospheric pressure (in a few seconds), the water flow stops. There is no magic perpetual motion going on here. Ed Schultheis, PE Licensed professional mechanical engineer Mechanical design engineer and manufacturing consultant for 35 years Schultek Engineering & Technology, Inc.

[@loucinci3922]

Busted! That will never work. There is no source kinetic energy. Thanks for sharing

[@ilocanodetoy2225]

The pressure chamber might need to be taller than the inlet and or the outlet to be able to push down water using gravityand and air pressure and might need a little vacuum pressure to keep going.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

Which part of perpetual motion machines are impossible is hard for you to understand?

[@ACR_BOX]

@@blaster-zy7xx The motion comes from the current, waves or tide.. It is pressure buildup followed by vacuum suction. That mean leakage is a big thing to make it right. Another is the volume and the length. This is equal in length but reduced in pipe size. That means you can not produce the pressure/vacuum you need... So size matters and in a pressure/vacuum system, it needs to be consistent and without much leakage... Keep in mind that it is based on NATURAL pressure, that means limited pressure. That means limited distance and limited volume... This means standing or low flowing water will always run out of pressure. If you do it in a river and/or canal it is more effective. If you ad a floater with weights to the part that is in the channel, the movement of current, wave and tide will build up natural pressure. It is a very old, thousands years old and proven concept that works.. Look at history about: Bamboo piping & pumps + water elevation systems ect ect.

[@mohamedyoussef1816]

لقد أخطأ فى التصميم

[@mohamedyoussef1816]

انا صنعت تصميم ناجح وفعال جدا.

[@josipdrazin6708]

It clearly works, it's just not how everyone expected. The reason that this type of vacuum pump is being showed to everyone by those "scammers" is because of development. Who knows... Maybe someone will have an idea on how to improve and make use of this type of pump.

[@videofeed99]

We need to see a debunk using a 55 gallon drum, with check valves, etc. and dumping the water back into the intake, like a perpetual machine. Just for the fun of it :-)

[@kjellg6532]

Ha, ha ;) impossible.

[@DJTechnuero]

an interesting PVC pipe pump is the one that you pump presure inside the vacuum , that makes more sence.

[@khalilbouhmouch4437]

The reason it doesn't work is because the level of your outlet should be lower than the level of your source water, your design suggests that you could flow water upward which is not possible. Try using the same pipe that you're using for the intake in your outlet. For starting your siphon, it should be completely filled with water before opening the outlet valve. In your case I think the easiest way is to open the outlet valve, put the whole thing inside the water to fill it, close the outlet, put everything in place, and then let the siphon flow indefinitely. Good luck :)

[@LandtoHouse]

The original video here on youtube had a guy flowing tremendous water out from just shaking the system into the water. I wanted to prove it wrong.

[@buggsy5]

Yep. Such videos are faked. It would be a perpetual motion machine if it actually worked. There would be nothing to keep you from piping the output water back to the input pool and just keep recirculating the same water. There are thousands of such fake videos out there.

[@kw57rx8dr.9]

You can too flow water upwards but only once a good prime is established which this never was, this was all user error.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

No, you can’t flow water uphill t an outlet higher than the intake without additional power. The other videos showing this are hoaxes.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

@@kw57rx8dr.9 Did you delete your recent reply to me? I hope that you realized your error. Yes you can siphon liquid up into a siphon tube and down the other side, but the key is that THE OUTLET MUST BE LOWER THAN THE INTAKE! That is how a siphon works. You can not siphon from a lower level to a higher level any more than you can make a ramp and have water spontaneously run uphill with no external power. The claim of this "siphon" moving water from the level of the pond to an outlet higher than the surface level of the pond is a scam. It's simple physics.

[@sidalilagha9545]

thanks

[@maddhatter3564]

common sense tells us water does not run up hill. but ty for showing it in real time.

[@leonkeating2212]

using hydrostatic pressure you'll need a wider inlet narrowing to the outlet and smallest head hight possible and think about adding back pressure so com plete system needs to be air tight too, also pond shape, depth of intake, water hardness and more are factors.

[@kevink9397]

In another video, possibly the same one that you had initially watched, the guy had a longer pick-up tube and (evidently) deeper water at the bank allowing him to take longer thrusting motions whereas you used short strokes like you were jingling your change. The longer thrusts likely built greater pressure because of the greater volume/mass of the water. If you have another go at it, try using it in deeper water where you can get greater volume.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

Which part of perpetual motion machines are impossible is hard for you to understand?

[@kevink9397]

​@@blaster-zy7xx Your reading comprehension skills need some work. I never said it would work in perpetuity, I said the other video looks like it compressed more air which allowed it to flow for a longer period of time. BTW, you should find a new answer to share with the class, maybe even try to understand those replies rather than being a condescending little prick.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

@@kevink9397 NO YOU DID NOT! Did you forgot that this is a WRITTEN format that we all can simply READ what you wrote the first time? The original video is simply a hoax. Attempting to defend the hoax only illustrates that you didn't know that the original was a hoax and simply can not work.

[@kevink9397]

@@blaster-zy7xx woo-hoo! And again you're off your meds, or so it seems. No one responding to your vid is purporting the existence of perpetual motion. You're either here to pick fights or your simply a nutlog. Either way sparky, I suggest you seek help.

[@JurassicJenkins]

@1:34 I don’t think I’m going to glue this valve on so I can return it as we all know free energy machines don’t work. The only constant flow is pocket money from trying these ridiculous hyped up contraptions. 🎈toodaloo

[@southidahostem1684]

I wonder if you first submerged the entire apparatus and manouver it about to get the air completely out of the system and then set it

[@virgiliogaza2169]

It's working.

[@pappaG2000]

Did you glue the fittings together? Air leaks causes siphons to stop. All siphons work, we use them in civil engineering everyday without issues when the seals are properly made.

[@shadowhawk1st]

DEFINATELY want to see the barrel siphon results!!!! I've seen many of those videos. I get the concept. Looks reasonable. But looks too good to be true and I have no place to try it

[@liveinfoportal]

me too..... looks too real

[@chrisschoenen8888]

Wood be great to see this this.

[@kjellg6532]

Barrel. siphon works fine, if and only if, the water level at the inlet is higher than the delivery. As with any siphon, the system must be filled with water and air tight. To prevent air coming in via the exit, just dip it into a bucket of water.

[@Cali_cruzin]

The guy laid his flat to fill whereas you are keeping it vertical the whole time. Could that be a factor?

[@alphonceo3571]

lm here due to interest in green energy and convenience it'll bring me living in rural setting. I'm wondering if I can incorporate wind mill turbine to help build pressure in the set up, could the water flow with good pressure...lm not good at physics/sciences🤗

[@terjeoseberg990]

You forgot to add the pump and battery inside the thicker part of the tubing.

[@alishahbaz3145]

Hi sir if I need pipe 2" working also pls reply thanks

[@Dagins]

um, I could be mistaken but it's not going to work filling it that way you need to flip it over or fill it on it's side. pretty sure you needed the pressure tank to be full of water not air... or you would need to attach something to increase the air pressure (like a bike pump), otherwise it's more of an air pocket than anything exerting pressure. but it should be as full as possible I would think. (that said can't say I've done it)

[@virgiliogaza2169]

100% accurate for me, thanks for the schematic diagram on how it's done.

[@jaywatts333]

the guy turn his pump sideways pumping (filling it with water) then stood it upright. did it 2-3 times. each time it worked. lol

[@qa2856]

Thanks for doing this experiment! I’ve been wondering about this for months. Have you seen the modification where a Schrader valve is added to the top of the air chamber and a bicycle pump is used to pressurize the air chamber? Not sure if that would help.

[@LandtoHouse]

I sure have seen that version. I think that would help to get it started but there's no way it would run more than maybe 1 or 2 minutes.

[@jessierangel434]

I think that pressure will keep it working for an extended period of time. Please try that before completely debunking this theory. Thank you

[@kjellg6532]

Air into a siphon will ruin the siphon function. Pumping in air is a hoax!

[@buggsy5]

@@jessierangel434 No, it won't. There is no head of pressure to supply the water needed to replace the water that flows out. Using the Schrader valve to pressurize the second tube would just blow out whatever water is past it in the system. Any demos are absolute fakes - perpetual motion machines do not work.

[@hili467]

what is the original video? what are we comparing the debunking video to?

[@feellnfroggy]

I was excited at first, guess it’s just a temporary way to get water from a canal lower than the place of land.

[@cdtero]

To have a better understanding of what is going on inside the System, you should make sure that the whole system is fully sealed, hermetic, leak-proof, so that no air is sucked in, or leaked out. Then you should use some kind of PC-compatible pressure measurement System that allows you to messure pressure at different points of your device, and display the results on your Laptop Screen.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

Which part of perpetual motion machines are impossible is hard for you to understand?

[@cdtero]

@@blaster-zy7xx ...I don't care what we are told in College or in the books, we are never told the whole Truth about science. Anyway, this kind of systems does not defy or violate Thermodynamics Laws in the way we are told because the working principle is based on piping tricks and gravity. I have seen similar devices Work with some design modifications.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

@@cdtero Nope, doesn't happen. You are unwittingly advocating for a perpetual motion machine. If you were correct, (which you are not) then the water could be endlessly pumped up to a higher point and allowed to flow downhill, running a turbine or whatever. Nope. In order to add potential energy (actively lifting something to a higher level) energy MUST be added into the system. There is no free lunch.

[@cdtero]

@@blaster-zy7xx ...For decades Lots of scientists have been threatened, persecuted, silenced, discredited, censored, suppressed, or killed just for defying the interests of big Corrpporattions or the Esttablishmment. Find out about the misterious death of Stanley Meyer, the inventor of water fuel cell

[@cdtero]

@@blaster-zy7xx ....Lol, its hard to open the eyes of someone who has been brainwashed since childhood by the Establishment. You have to think out of the box buddy. Don't follow the traditional methods or assumptions that we are taught in school. Do your own science at home. Think of gravity as a Potential energy battery, play with pressure, pipe diameters, volume, fluid speed, etc. Sometimes you might get results that don't obey Physics Laws. You might think that you are doing sonething wrond but you aren't. It is just that we are not told the whole truth about science.

[@preciouspetal7974]

Your pieces obviously aren't glued together well for a piece to fall off. They said that if the seal is not good then air can escape and it reduces the pressure so it won't work. That's why they glue both sides of each piece before putting them together (to ensure an air-tight seal). He also gave it a much bigger plunge into the water than what you've done, including turning it on it's side to get a larger plunge. Sorry.. I wouldn't call this debunked while you have pieces that don't have a good seal on them and haven't done the large plunges needed to get the siphon started.

[@blaster-zy7xx]

Which part of perpetual motion machines are impossible is hard for you to understand?

[@normanharris1092]

You forgot to add Chineseum to the valve

[@helperchannel693]

I can use a rubber pipe and just suck the air and the water would just flow.. much longer.. like changing water for fish tank...maybe add a valve inlet for hand pump to get the water flowing.

[@thaihuynhcong6594]

A technical inconvenient concept:you need to shake your engine every time!

[@w91w91]

لماذا تنجح مع اصحاب الانابيب الزرقاء فقط ؟ اتمنى من الجميع يدعمون مقاطعك الصادقة 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

[@MGmirkin]

Now, if the OUTPUT side were to slope down, and reach further than the input water level, I think it would continue perpetually as a more standard siphon (just with the shaking "self-start" to prime it), since it would be traveling from a higher point to a lower point... So, it would just be a way to get water from some restricted high point like a lake over some obstruction and down to a lower point. But, yeah, having your output higher than your input isn't going to work, since water doesn't flow uphill, generally speaking. ;)

[@LandtoHouse]

OH ! I like that idea! I will give that a try as a fun way to start a siphon! Thank you for the great idea.

[@MGmirkin]

@@LandtoHouse Yeppers! (Hey, looks like it worked!) I think ti could be improved slightly by making the output side a stable setup that rests on the ground and making the input side like a flexible tube of similar diameter, with just a small length or rigid tube and a non-return valve at the end, maybe with a handle on it? I figure that way you wouldn't have to shake [apart] the entire contraption, just shake the short input end length of pipe. And I suspect with just a short pipe at the end and a flexible tube you could probably shake it in the water much faster to prime / start it more quickly? ^_^ Also, don't know if making the input side before the hump slightly larger, and the output pipe past the hump slightly smaller would help? Just thinking that less water would "leak out" and less air would suck back in on the output side, so maybe it would "fully prime" faster with slightly greater input size than output size? Only a guess... ^_^

[@LandtoHouse]

@@MGmirkin It worked very well. Thank you for the suggestion. I actually already found the materials in my shop to begin every part of the test that you are mentioning. I will try to get that video filmed sometime this week. I did learn that the name for this is actually jiggle siphon.

[@MGmirkin]

Would also still love to see one of my other suggestions from way back. Was thinking for long hills where you maybe want to do multiple "pit stop" reservoirs and additional ram pumps to pump further up a long hill, you "lose" a lot of water out of the system at each additional ram pump, which is very "lossy." But what if at each new uphill ram pump you put the output check valve in like a plastic box with a drain on it that feeds back down into the next downhill reservoir (and an overflow on that reservoir that feeds into the box that feeds back to the prior reservoir, as well), so that you're basically "recapturing" your losses and giving them a second chance at life [2nd/3rd/4th chance to go back up the hill]. Then at the very bottom ram pump, like you can use its "losses" to do something useful like watering a garden, or whatnot. Was just a thought I had on making the system slightly less "lossy." (Lots of water just ends up being "wasted" and never making it up the hill, but it seems like it could be recaptured fairly easily at uphill pumps and reused at lower reservoirs / pumps. And then perhaps only the bottom-most pump would be "lossy"?)

[@MGmirkin]

Also wondered if it's possible to make a **large** "reservoir" with multiple outputs (drive pipes) that come to like a Y-joint or a 3-way+ joint to feed a ram pump, such that the outputs have pipes at like different heights inside the reservoir with something like float valves that will open them when the water gets above certain level(s) and the float valve opens, thus feeding an additional input/drive pipe down to the ram pump(s) and either increasing head pressure or maybe flow rate, or both? I'm thinking like as a way to account for seasonal variability in a water source like a creek which may have more flow / volume in winter than summer. So you could always have some baseline amount of water being pumped, but as maybe flow increases in the fall/winter, you could expand your pumping capacity accordingly by opening additional float valves to deal with any extra water volume. I'm wondering if A) it's possible, B) what would be the effect? Would opening an additional float valve result in more head pressure (if both/all pipes go to a y-joint/3-way+ joint **before** the ram pump)? What would be the result? Faster cycling / flow rate, higher pressure or volume in the output after the ram pump? Also, I'm wondering, if it works, what would be the difference between putting a single ram pump **after the Y-joint or 3-/4-way join,** vs. putting individual ram pumps on each line **prior to the y-joint or 3-/4-way join?** Like would one produce more head pressure and faster cycle, whereas the other would produce more flow rate? And what would be the effect on output up the hill, and/or water waste at the ram pump? Would there be any benefit or savings to either ram pumps before or after the joint? Would multiple ram pumps on individual lines result in more water waster than a single ram pump after the join. Would a single ram pump end up with too much head pressure and cycle too fast, or "jam up" and not start cycling, etc.? I feel like the ram pumps on the individual lines prior to the joint(s) would probably be less problematic (IE not over-loading head pressure), though it may also waste more water due to multiple ram pumps going simultaneously? But would the "efficiency" still be basically the same, in terms of waste water vs. water pumped up the hill (you'd just get more water up the hill due to higher flow rate from multiple pumps running in parallel to feed the output pipe)? Does any of that make sense? Am I thinking about it right? Still kinda' new to ram pumps... But I think I'm slowly wrapping my brain around them...

[@rklauco]

There's a nice edit in the original video :) I wonder why... :)

[@ilargo]

Thanks for unveiling the stupidity and saving us the materials and time. Have a nice day

[@benniedonald]

In one of those videos I heard a battery powered dc pump running. Probably submersible pump in the first large diameter pipe.

[@LandtoHouse]

I think so too! Way way too much flow to be real.

[@Laxminarayanprajapati131]

how many hour does it work

[@waynechannon5253]

Glue your joints, how can it work if it is sucking air on the joints.

[@akbychoice]

I think the original had a shake activated battery powered pump inside one of the chambers.

[@ox_police]

🤣 must be

[@blaster-zy7xx]

Either that or there was a vide edit where an external pump was added to the intake side and hidden under the water of the pond.

[@michaeldonovan6076]

it had a shake valve creating a syphone effect you can buy the valves for couple dollars.

[@vlad3k]

You need to PUMP AIR in the pressure tank. So ACTUALLY GIVE IT SOME PREASURE. Install a small bicicleta wheel vent. So you can pump the air in easily.

[@alirezamirhabibi8039]

Interesting, in past years I worked on something like this in a different and more simple structure to make a free generator based on infinite water stream cycle and I didn't get good result :).

[@ACR_BOX]

It is pressure buildup followed by vacuum suction. That mean leakage is a big thing to make it right. Another is the volume and the length. This one is equal in length but reduced in pipe size. That means you can not produce the pressure/vacuum you need... So size matters and in a pressure/vacuum system, it needs to be consistent and without much leakage... Keep in mind that it is based on NATURAL pressure, that means limited pressure. That means limited distance and limited volume... This means standing or low flowing water will always run out of pressure. If you do it in a river and/or canal it is more effective. If you ad a floater with weights to the part that is in the channel, the movement of current, wave and tide will build up natural pressure. It is a very old, thousands years old and proven concept that works.. Look at history about: Bamboo piping & pumps + water elevation systems ect ect. There is enough info out there to make it work.

[@strategygamingmalaysia8906]

Can you make trompe pump

[@waynechannon5253]

not busted until you illuminate the leaks of air in your system.

[@dennisfrase5179]

The video I seen some how the guy pumped air into tank # 2, don’t understand how he kept air from getting out!!!

[@ristosavic71]

Sve ste dobro napravili samo ventil mora biti otvoren prije nego što krene voda.

[@somenumboola]

I also think that it supposed to: - be air tight - first tank should contain volume bigger than inlet pipe - second tank should contain volume more than exhaust pipe.

[@jarrodforet3557]

U need almost double the flow side of pipe as wat u have on suction

[@mustaphatajudeen973]

Thanks I did one too but is not working

[@Dingsrud]

Inlet is lower than outlet so this is not a siphon. It is a manual pump with a lot of funny impractical stuff on it. Will only deliver water as long as you keep on pumping.

[@Tim8mit]

although it is probably a rube Goldberg invention, not having hermetically sealed connections will effect the quality, I have witness a lower that expected performance with a pool cleaning system, until every o ring was silicone greased and all permanent attachments were glued in place

[@calebdoner]

Conservation of energy. It's a thing. All that flow you got was from the energy you physically exerted pumping that contraption back and forth in the water.

[@ernestoaquino1250]

LASTLY, FROM WHAT I OBSERVED, THE VALVED WAS ALREADY OPEN, in fact the other video is without a valve - so when it was "shaken" in the water, it pumped up water easily. try doing it that way - keep the valve open.

[@1981dasimpson]

i have never scene this congiurtation and cant see how it would ever work at least with the others i have scene with the big barrels do make more sence if they do work

[@LandtoHouse]

I think the channel was mrcover. there is a jump cut right when the water starts flowing. Probably a pump connected.

[@1981dasimpson]

@@LandtoHouse yeah I would say impella pump in the empty tube

[@matolaer6813]

I saw a vedio..... that need more shake until more water to come out.

[@natarakikimat2532]

Oulet must be no change in direction. It should be straight. That will reduce the pressure.

[@34286244]

I think it's not work because you use same size input and output pipe. I think input pipe need to be bigger than the output pipe.

[@jacqueslemiere]

to pump water up you need at least to bring the equivalent of gravitational energy... of course, you can initially put some energy in the system like pressurize gaz or whaterver but once it is used. the flow stops... no need to debunk as i ve never see one working... but...well..trying by yourself is fine...but ..physicists have done that long ago..

[@rafaelsandoval7077]

The front pipe supposed to be low to the ground to cause gravity. You have it almost the same height

[@colman1081]

I think you are doing it all wrong, you must use a cocacola bottle.. because everything will work well with a cocacola bottle.. lol..😂😂😂

[@LandtoHouse]

Ah yes that must be what is missing. haha

[@tllong124]

The entire intake pipe (until the first ‘vacuum chamber’) diameter should be larger (maybe double the size) of the output diameter. It works. Try again. The ‘vacuum/ pressure chambers’ should be larger.

[@ricrafols]

try to study the bernoulli's equation for energy gradient line

[@Orbacron]

Yeah.. I tried it.. But I didn't have 300 feet to see if slope velocity would keep it going

[@tracyannbanks123_12]

Keep trying buddy!

[@tracyannbanks123_12]

I’d love to know you better that’s if you don’t mind

[@chancecooper9246]

Your valve was open and you didn’t even use glue on the pipe. Hell it fell off lol. With that many leaks of course it’s not gonna work. It’s simple gravity, you moving water from another place with gravity. It’s possible.

[@jarrodforet3557]

So are you going for the class clown, if u build it like the other build I don't think u have enough suction pipe inches

[@user-xv9xw7vs3h]

It will only work if the outlet lower than the upstream water level.

[@CristiDanciu-cu3gl]

as we know, the whole installation must be very well evacuated, so it must be glued, so that it does not get air anywhere, the pipe falls out at the first shake>>>>..........?????

[@98trooperful]

It would work if a hose was attached to outflow running the hose to lower ground .

[@artsmith7254]

Guaranteed this will work. Get rid of the check valve and put the output end lower than the input.

[@alisideh9565]

Did you do it yourself that you guarantee? Or did you see it on Facebook?

[@artsmith7254]

@@alisideh9565 Ive done it many times. Siphoning gas, water, and other things. Just need to fill up the tube first. Its called gravity.

[@rubixphx74]

You have to turn the whole system sideways look at the video again and see how when he tries to pump it back and forth in the water upright the water doesn't really come out you got to clean it to the side and then pump it in and out of the water once the water starts flowing big time you tilt to back up and set it down then it'll work with a lot of pressure

[@hypnoman]

you didn't glue your pipes? air will escape if you dont cement your pvc

[@jamesshelton7301]

The disign of this isn't calculated properly. As others have stated, this utilizes the siphon principle. Having a ram pump in that thing would be cool.

[@ACR_BOX]

It is pressure buildup followed by vacuum suction. That mean leakage is a big thing to make it right. Another is the volume and the length. Yours is equal in length but reduced in pipe size. That means you can not produce the pressure/vacuum you need... So size matters and in a pressure/vacuum system, it needs to be consistent and without much leakage... Keep in mind that it is based on NATURAL pressure, that means limited pressure. That means limited distance and limited volume... This means standing or low flowing water will always run out of pressure. If you do it in a river and/or canal it is more effective. If you ad a floater with weights to the part that is in the channel, the movement of current, wave and tide will build up natural pressure. It is a very old, thousands years old and proven concept that works.. Look at history about: Bamboo piping & pumps + water elevation systems ect ect.