Thanks my friend! amazing explanation!👌 Just a little feedback, is that you don't need the background music 😉🤗
@FuturMinds6 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback and I'm glad you liked the content :)
@Truth_TakenКүн бұрын
Very helpful! 💛
@FuturMinds23 сағат бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@siddharthp921624 күн бұрын
you should make a detailed course on udemy its really really good
@FuturMinds24 күн бұрын
Thanks @siddharthp9216. That means a lot :)
@MrGluepower21 күн бұрын
Why DataStax is investing projects in langflow to get you to production if its not made to use in production?
@FuturMinds21 күн бұрын
'Production' word is subjective. It's not ideal for someone who is building complex applications and needs more control and customization (atleast today). It may be ideal for someone who is building saas/simple application or doing POC. There are good number of customers in the later category and that's what DataStax is currently targeting.
@wesleymogaka17 күн бұрын
Very good response. Langflow is good for quick prototypes. It can also do complex ones but then the flowcharts will be too many and confusing and it to be easier to just code. The best tool in the family in my opinion is langgraph. It's easy to learn and create complex agentic workflows.
@cloudengineer-kb8yg11 күн бұрын
excellent explainer - thanks
@FuturMinds10 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it :)
@wesleymogaka17 күн бұрын
Can I replace langsmith with logging and analytics?
@FuturMinds16 күн бұрын
@wesleymogaka yes you can use logging and analytics instead of langsmith. But you will need to manage all the logic to make sense of the logging data. Langsmith makes the life easier by abstracting all those implementation details. You may want to explore the open source alternatives of langsmith.
@paragajg3 күн бұрын
Frankly Langchain is good for quick poc anything serious production ready the framework isn’t matured and has lots of overhead. Best to stick to well written lean custom codes for production. Underneath all one is doing is calling API services 🤣