Largest Economies in the World 1600-2022 | Top 15 Countries by GDP

[@reporol]

When a company is wealthier than the country it comes from😳

[@lillekenatnek195]

east india company xd

[@hopetagulos]

@kaan aras roubando de Portugal.

[@yuumiko3060]

@@hopetagulos cope

[@CorvusLeukos]

Not wealthier but more productive since they had more population

[@notvergingai1053]

@kaan aras cope.

[@AlbertEinstein-qt2uw]

During the time of Mauryans and Gupta's: Indian economy contributed 32% of world's GDP When British came to India: India's contribution to the world's GDP was 27% When British left India: India's contribution to the world's GDP was 0.008%

[@moiceey]

Without British influence in India. India would probably look something like Pakistan today or maybe even worse.

[@AlbertEinstein-qt2uw]

@@moiceey save your Britain...otherwi it'll go bankrupt very soon 😂

[@moiceey]

@@AlbertEinstein-qt2uw lol I agree with you about that

[@AmanVerma-qh9jv]

@PranavXD yes and if British never came, maybe the partition would never have happened.

[@AlbertEinstein-qt2uw]

@PranavXD and before Mughals, there were Mauryans, Guptas,etc.

[@kasahne5925]

Germany lost 2 worldwars and its still top 4. Respect!

[@23Drazse]

Germany is the engine of the European economy.

[@tigerdavid3982]

India looted by 500y.muslims kings, 200 British but still in top 5 great bharat 🇮🇳🇮🇳👍

[@North_annex]

@@tigerdavid3982 yeah

[@HammadMirza_yt]

Bro British looted not Mughals. Mughals stayed in India they didn’t went anywhere how can you say they looted

[@North_annex]

@@HammadMirza_yt muslim kings dont only mean the mughals

[@Optidorf]

Gotta love the fact that Belgium was in the top 15 in 1772, 58 years before its inception.

[@Capelle79]

Nice catch, pretty sure was still the Netherlands back then right?

[@Andrij-v6k]

Also Prussia, HRE and 'Habsburg Monarchy' all being shown as 3 seperate countries even though all 3 being the same country/entity...

[@mobrown7594]

That’s why this list is bull crap lol

[@pawerosinski1322]

Just like Poland in the 19th century when it was not on the maps

[@arthurlecomte8950]

Back then, roughly the terrain of modern day Belgium was a possession of the Austrian monarchy. But it has been a rich region since the Middle Ages.

[@Duck_The_Coloniser]

India is an example for what happens when there isn't a centralized country at the correct time

[@believeme1001]

Please explain what you r sayin please

[@ashu0]

one more point- when your country is ruled by religion.... this happens.

[@marcusvergara6193]

@@believeme1001 when a bunch of countries aren’t United, they become easier to invade. If India was United, it wouldn’t become the British raj.

[@telefon8102]

@@marcusvergara6193 😂 nope read about british-mughal wars

[@rhythmmandal3377]

@@marcusvergara6193 Most of india wasn't really INVADED, the British just said give us money and we supply you with good stuff and guess what it worked. It's only the hindi/urdu speaking morons who are the one that got invaded because they were way to stupid to co operate + most of the soldirs of the EIC ware other indians.

[@willjapheth23789]

Apparently, the USA decided it was time to grow in the 1820s and just didn't stop. The rapid growth of Japan and the USSR is also pretty impressive, though it only lasted a few decades.

[@AndrewJ9673]

The US was a quickly growing economy ever since the 1740s and 1750s. Britain didn't regulate too much in the colonies, and real estate, farming, and a few other industries made it a very profitable area, which was part of the tension that led to the Revolution. When the US became independent, it appealed to skilled and unskilled laborers from different European countries and sects of Christianity, which gave it a constantly expanding population, alongside westward settlement and MORE real estate schemes. The explosion of the cotton industry to meet European demand also helped fuel America's own industrial revolution in the East Coast, and it's why the US was able to expand so much. While Europe has always been stratified and land has been passed down through generations, with a lower and lower population growth due to disease, famine, and a lack of migrants, the US was taking on immigration waves and had a constant surplus of labor and land for new industry and new settlement. I'm sure if you looked at a population chart you'd see the US take a similar trend as they do here. It's pretty crazy.

[@NeostormXLMAX]

qing proved china was always the top economy so it going back to the top isn't out of the norm

[@AndrewJ9673]

@@NeostormXLMAX China was only a top economy because, by medieval and age of exploration standards, they had everything. Today, they rely on the rest of the world for food, electronics, and investment. Industrial products that don't rely as much on raw materials as they do on industry and technical workers. They are still a second-rate economy in terms of development and per-capita gross product, with a long way to go.

[@rostyslavkozhushko5841]

God save the King!

[@Big_Caesar1]

@@NeostormXLMAX Qing had massive labor force, but huge peasant population. USA was highly skilled compared to China.

[@CCC-zg9ii]

From thousands of years ago to the present, there are only a few civilizations that have experienced countless rises and falls and are still standing.

[@kenng9742]

Only one, China

[@truetool]

​@@kenng9742 India

[@leventklnc701]

Turks

[@kaiser6332]

Germany

[@A_a_A_a_A_a_A]

Japan

[@Caglexercises]

Thanks!

[@gozhdaa]

Thank You

[@MdnZunors]

Give me also brother😢

[@jirachi-wishmaker9242]

British Raj means British Rule. British Crown omitted the Hindustan/India part after they took over in 1857(because of the revolt) from British East India company . Still the army was called British Indian Army.

[@andym9571]

Because most of the Army were Indians

[@christophermurpy3803]

This has the french empire, Spanish empire but the tool who does these never shows the British empire as a whole? I love the way the USA jumps straight in, I wonder where all the money was going to before 1776?

[@aksmex2576]

Same with Canada. It would have been a part of the empire. Although we were thaught the Brits subsidized Canada's industry in return for soldiers and loyalty.

[@indiasuperclean6969]

SIR MY INDIA IS THE REAL SUPERPOWER 🤗🇮🇳 WE HAVE THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE AND HIGHSPEED RAIL 🤗🇮🇳 MEANWHILE IN CHINA PEOPLE STILL RIDE RICKSHAW EVERYWHERE AND THEY ALSO POOR DONT HAVE CAR . THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳

[@jirachi-wishmaker9242]

@@indiasuperclean6969 CCP Bot

[@HerrClementzin]

I am amazed how Mexico, despite the fact that it has not had peace in a very short time in its history has been among the top 20 economies for almost an entire century.

[@MrCarlGW]

Mexico has a lot of potential today.

[@alr6111]

Lol Mexico sux. Lost half its territory to America.

[@alr6111]

Plus, the US only existed for 6 years and made it into the top 15.

[@fayero5]

México puede ser una potencia mundial del top 5 si quisieran sus mandatarios, pero un pais realmente es próspero cuando sus habitantes viven bien independientemente de su pib Un saludo desde España 🇪🇸 🤝🇲🇽

[@blasco3245]

México has a Lot of potencial, but they Will never be a powerful economy because of their stockholm syndrome with usa

[@Tout-Le-Monde02]

3:01 - the jump that the East India Company made circa 1757 was solely because they defeated the last ruler of Bengal and occupied it. Bengal was the richest province of the Mughal Empire and the revenue that the company got from it alone was 1/3 of the British empire's total GDP annually ......

[@FBI.capturo.gente.rara.]

The Spanish empire had the real de a 8 the most important currency in the world for a long time that even the other European empires had to use that currency if they wanted to trade in Asia.

[@FBI.capturo.gente.rara.]

Example the United Kingdom had to pay with that currency when it wanted to get Singapore from the Malacca Sultanate

[@dazd14]

REAL DE 8 COMES FROM NEW SPAIN, even in 1900's USA used mexican silver currency until dollars became the most powerful currency, real de 8 is novohispanic/mexican silver, let us all remember that fact

[@FBI.capturo.gente.rara.]

@@dazd14 New Spain is part of Spain

[@juanmanuelgonzalezvazquez1913]

El real de 8 se acuñaba también en Bolivia y Perú y se empezó a acuñar en el continente americano a partir del siglo XVII, pero su origen es el la corona de Castilla en 1497

[@amareshsingh1460]

A lot of things changed during and after industrial revolution. Before that GDP for any empire/country was mostly dependent on their population as most of work was done with hands which meant more working hands is equal to more productivity. Industrial revolution and subsequent imperialism meant much smaller countries were ruling the charts. Great Britain/United Kingdom for example was one of biggest economies because they were supplier for one of biggest consumers of that time British Raaj. But since India was so huge, even the internal economy (which was predominantly agriculture based) resulted in such huge GDP for British Raaj. Per capita GDP would have given better picture where we could have clearly seen almost similar value for most countries and then a sharp rise for countries where Industrial Revolution happened.

[@CountingStars333]

It's not just population, and population also depends upon wealth and progress. Per capita too India and china were ahead of Europe for a long time.

[@abcdmefgh2843]

​@@CountingStars333lol, lmao

[@HelloWorld-cq1sq]

Good points. I also think GDP (PPP) is useful to look at, because that reflects that in India, $10 buys more goods / services than $10 buys in the US. Hence India may have less money, but it can accomplish more with a certain amount of money than the US can, e.g. because Indian labor costs are lower. In terms of GDP (PPP), the list goes: China, then US, then India, then Japan, then Germany, then Russia.

[@indiancowpeedrinker9241]

Helo ur compooder has virus

[@calvinfinney5083]

Yeah that's the confusing part of this illustration. Industrial production via the Industrial Revolution should have shifted the economic balance towards the European nations in the mid to late 1700's.

[@josephhoward4697]

It’s amazing that the U.S. reached #2 by the first centennial and then took the #1 spot only ten years later, in 1888. Seriously, we moved really fast. Far faster than I thought, that’s for sure!

[@YoJimBoHugabaJoe]

Well all the locals were all easily exterminated and there not many neighbouring nations with standing armies and little threat from a naval invasion

[@miguelcarunchod.1493]

They took the land from the Indian tribes and once the petrol oil became the new energy source they found out in the USA territory was where it was easier to extract.

[@josephhoward4697]

@@miguelcarunchod.1493 Cool

[@parkyamato9450]

@@miguelcarunchod.1493 so? they were still able to tho?

[@miguelcarunchod.1493]

@@parkyamato9450 one of the methods they used were blankets infected with smallpox which caused an epidemic. If you been been aware of recent world events, the whole world would be pissed if someone tried to do that nowadays.

[@NERFGAMERYT]

Huge Respect for *India & Germany* {Struggled the most} still on top 4,5

[@eliasvonbrille]

It's insane to me that India is 5th. How can the quality of life be so insanely low while the government is so wealthy. What kind of Government is that?

[@yvpsghend6425]

​@@eliasvonbrille GDP is not the government's wealth. It is the country's collective wealth (including the government). The quality of life is comparatively low because of the huge population. The per capita income is low in India.

[@eliasvonbrille]

@@yvpsghend6425 What I was suggesting is that the Government has a lot of the wealth while the people don't. Honestly it's also probably partly because of the insane gap between poor and rich. It was just shocking to me that a third world country would be basically on par with some of the most developed and most amazing to life in country's in the world. Something really went wrong there.

[@bhaskarbose9706]

@eliasvonbrille.. what do you mean by the government of India having a lot of wealth? Are you talking about tax revenue collected? If that's so, then even if the tax revenue is high compared to other countries, the amount of money that gets reinvested to each person (per capita) is still very low because of the high population.

[@hemantsinha23]

​@@eliasvonbrille GDP means per capita× Population. It does mean government has money, but it has to manage a huge Population also

[@armchairwarrior963]

China from two thousand years ago and to today, still on the same list.

[@Mrinalini.m]

No it was INDIA on top for hundreds of years

[@armchairwarrior963]

@@Mrinalini.m India is a modern concept. Mogul Muslim united India, British United India. Indians in the past were different countries, different languages and peoples etc... So it was not.

[@reddragon100]

@@armchairwarrior963 Nation states are new concept. India today has many language and culture. Empire like Mauryan, Gupta, Delhi, Sultanate, Mughals and Martha do exist

[@reddragon100]

@@Mrinalini.m Yeah. Many empires united India from Mauryan to delhi to mughals. Every modern state is new. By that logic, current china is from 1949

[@reddragon100]

@@armchairwarrior963 Mauryans and Delhi sultanate united it too.

[@arnaudpayet6173]

The fact that France and UK have been in the top 5 / top 10 for the past 400 years is pretty impressive !!

[@masterniggoway]

@Ram Chod I wonder why is British Museum called international robbery showpiece museum

[@kye4216]

@@masterniggoway well it’s lucky they did or all those artefact’s would have been destroyed

[@DiogoSilva-og7tc]

@@masterniggoway Visit country, take souvenir. "OMG THAT'S LITERALLY STEALING WTFFF"

[@manumudgal4988]

Yeh due to colonialism and economic exploitation of countries.

[@xochitlxochipa4965]

Also does Spain, Just behind these two countries ...

[@Rickybaba96]

Portugal 🇵🇹 and Netherlands 🇳🇱 are honestly quite impressive. Both are tiny in terms of land and population (when compared to other powers), both have far larger neighbours, both managed to be top economic powers for centuries.

[@skyvuegen]

Belgium also impressive

[@notme1628]

It’s because of stealing Africas wealth.

[@skyvuegen]

@@notme1628 cope

[@Rickybaba96]

@@notme1628 Thats basic imperialism. Africans were stealing each others wealth prior to and during European colonialism. Also you're wrong. The colonisation of most of Africa was costly with the exception of a few colonies. Most of the wealth of these Empires came from the Americas and Asia. Portugal relied on its Asian colonies and then heavily on Brazil, Spain on its vast American Empire, and Netherlands on Indonesia. Even the British relied mostly on their South Asian colonies. In fact, with the exception of Belgium and the late Portuguese Empire, Europeans did not rely on African wealth. One can make the argument that the most important thing to come out of Africa were the slaves, rather than its resources, since the slaves allowed Europeans to grow their economic strength in the Americas.

[@notme1628]

@@Rickybaba96 France until now is stealing from Africa go see what the Italian prime minister ( Giorgia Meloni ) said + the wealth that Europeans took from america it was for the origin people who lived there. For europe to rise innocent people suffered but every nation have there time my nation Arabs had there time ( the golden age of Islam ) Persian had there’s + the Turks and much more.

[@GrizzerBear]

Imagine having the largest economy in the world for 125 straight years, and still being 31 Trillion in debt....

[@tolissimus4015]

No contradiction here

[@gloverfox9135]

The majority of that debt is internal, money that is owed to other US companies.

[@grimmsby3011]

Every major country is in debt to each other in some way or another, it's not uncommon. Did you think this was esoteric and secret knowledge you were dropping on everyone?

[@Posidon09]

Problem with that statement is that while it sounds huge for any other country that's a around 125 percent ratio. If you look at china and include their province debt than they are iver 200 percent

[@shaansingh6048]

Every country has huge debts its economic knowledge to always keep big debts

[@LRomano]

1:23 Italy enters as the 8th richest on the planet and remains there for more than 400 years is a great achievement and stereotypes come to say that we are in crisis

[@yeeterrl5700]

In terms of gdp but life quality and economic growth Italy is in crisis

[@chevyjd2007]

Italy wasnt unified until like the late 19 century.

[@SMGJohn]

GDP does not equate to people being rich, imagine being this ignorant.

[@LRomano]

@@chevyjd2007 n nothing at the time of our roman empire which was until 1453 the italy peninsula was already unified

[@uckbritley1305]

@@LRomano If you're gonna count the fall of rome as the fall of the byzantine empire, you'll be very disappointed to learn that eastern rome only held the majority of Italy for a few years in the year 565 and then it was never unified until modern Italy. And also they were Greek and not Italian lol

[@michelvanhaverbeke410]

Belgium didn’t exist before 1830

[@ommsterlitz1805]

It's so dumb, Poland, Belgium, Netherland, Spain Italy were all part of France during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars it would have shown more countries but i guess he was too lazy

[@Monty2022]

In the 1880s, Britain should have the largest economy since it ruled the British Raj

[@FodaseNaoLigo]

No.

[@Monty2022]

@@FodaseNaoLigo yes.

[@FodaseNaoLigo]

@@Monty2022 no

[@PokeCastle]

@@FodaseNaoLigo yes

[@Monty2022]

@@FodaseNaoLigo yes

[@lawrencewood289]

Absolutely amazing work!!! I do think there are some currency calculation issues as aside from wars some countries flip pretty rapidly. Shows the utter devastation the Thirty Years War wrought on Germany (Holy Roman Empire). Also shows how the Ottomans failed to industrialize. Fascinating the positions of the UK and France thru the years. I'm shocked Prussia's economy was as large as it was. Sad to show how recently the Italian economy has withered. Demonstrates the utter dominance of the US and China.

[@midosch7639]

You totally skipped the German Kaiser Reich, Weimar republic and the Third Reich by just a calling it Germany after the Holy Roman Empire.

[@jonu28]

After the unification, they were basically the same country.

[@midosch7639]

@@jonu28 ok now I understand. The changes are not political but more geografical, thank you for explaining it to me.

[@reezlaw]

@@midosch7639 just look at pre-1861 Italy

[@forest7570]

Заметьте, как выросла экономика США во время Первой и второй мировой войны. И как упали экономики других стран

[@amogussy_did_9.11]

It's nothing new here everybody knows that the US took advantage of the war to make money

[@cocktail2380]

Nu shto churban 🤣🤣🤣🤣 vasha ekonomika do six por ne rastyot .Rossiya i Putin kitayskiy vassal

[@forest7570]

@@cocktail2380 то есть Америка - Россия?) прикольно

[@BasicNoobs]

Is called Elizir. Some fall but some rise

[@АндрейКузнецов-х5н3т]

И что?

[@paidoseufilho3699]

7:39 Época do "boom" das commodities. Se tivéssemos nos industrializado durante este período já teríamos superado grande parte das grandes potências ocidentais, ficaríamos atrás apenas da Alemanha e dos EUA.🇧🇷

[@fayero5]

Podéis ser prosperos aún debido a todos los recursos naturales de Brasil, solo os hace falta tener maquinas para procesarlos

[@WhenAllTheWarmthLeavesUs]

Pois é, aí elegeram o porra do 9 dedos... Parece até que brasileiro gosta de sofrer.

[@lanabjpj2488]

@Brazilian 🇧🇷 para de ser honesto cara kkkk

[@AmanVerma-qh9jv]

Same for India too. 🇮🇳

[@dionisioricardo]

Bem, não fomos o pior. A Venezuela cresceu mais que o Brasil neste período e o resultado foi ainda pior.

[@lilmech3677]

I like how during both world wars, the rest of the world was losing money, while the US was going gas gas mode during both world wars

[@gaupa007]

That's because unlike Europe where every factory got blown to pieces, and their production not managing to keep up demands. The US didn't get blown up and they produced a surplus. Selling the surplus to the countries in war, and giving them loans which provided a huge boost to their economy.

[@ebanydwayne1357]

Belgium wasn't independent on the late 18th century, it would be a lot more realistic if autonomous regions were tied to the home ruler, it's like saying Scotland has a total different GDP than the UK or Catalonia from Spain, or Texas to the US

[@thedukeofholland3926]

Same with Indonesia, got its independence in 1949

[@mint8648]

Just add its figure to the Habsburg Monarchy

[@nein236]

Its not really "Independent" they werent a country to begin with. They were created as some sort of buffer between germany and france.

[@nein236]

@@darius524 Ok then. Enlighten me.

[@Gustavo-su8se]

It would be very bad to understand if they also told the economy of the colonies and dominated countries. It is better to show only the economy of the territories as they are today.

[@parlantheprussian8352]

Prussia in the early 17th century? I mean there was a duchy called Prussia but I doubt that it had a higher gdp than England at that time. Not even with Brandenburg together that was tied to Prussia in a personal union. The modern prussian state that is most likely meant here was only build up in the late 17th century and became a significant economic power not before the mid 18th century.

[@eugenic12]

The chart itself looks quite unrealistic. With all respect to China it was not even close to top 10 countries by gdp in the beginning of 20th century

[@mikhailshutov7418]

Абсолютно согласен. Россия явно уступала Франции периода Наполеона по национальному богатству. В видео они очень близки по показателям.

[@Andrij-v6k]

It might have had a larger economy than England without her colonies. This chart is region-based.

[@ReyZar666]

there is so much waisted potential in LA Brazil - Argentina - Mexico could be top 10 in a heart bit, if the conditions are met

[@user-pf1zr1po3r]

People with nationalities from large countries with a rich history and culture will find it really fun to learn about the history of their own country.

[@Komnenos83]

Considering their difficult history, poland is doing pretty well. Hard working people!

[@everrettbreezewood3665]

Poland didn't even exist from 1795 until 1918. Why is it even on the map?

[@Memistical]

aaaand there goes Poland again

[@GhGh-sj4wb]

No

[@DavidCelestialKnight]

The Worst geography in the planet

[@JacekPlacek_0]

Poland shouldn't be in table between 1795-1918

[@Ponanoix]

If you count HRE as a whole, then you should definitely count 'Prussia' 's GDP as part of PLC's one, up until 1660s (until then it was a fief)

[@JacobG4lant]

This is really confusing graph, countries are counted even if they dont exist at certain points

[@kiteparker4310]

@@JacobG4lant which?

[@JacobG4lant]

@@kiteparker4310 sorry bro but i am not going to rewatch this video, i dont remember which from 7 months ago 😂

[@Andrij-v6k]

No, that's not true. Only East Prussia (area around Königsberg) was a 'fief', but it was an autonomous region with in the PLC. The rest of Prussia(the bigger parts) had been a part of the HRE/Kingdom of Germany.

[@Ponanoix]

@@Andrij-v6k You're talking about Brandenburg, which was independent and was part of the HRE, true. But it wasn't Prussia. It became core part of the Kingdom of Prussia in 1701 (I believe), so when Electorate of Brandenburg and Duchy of Prussia united

[@manend2]

I find it simply amazing that, even when the economy shrank by a shit ton during 1929-1933, the us economy didn't even leave from it's top spot.

[@franckvermont1926]

Well, US is more comparable to EU because of its size

[@olddogoddments675]

Other economies were also affected by the Great Depression. That explains the US staying at the top spot then.

[@manend2]

@@olddogoddments675 let's not forget thou. the Soviets were cut off from the world economy, so they weren't effected at all unlike other nations

[@dive2drive314]

This is very cool how you do these videos. Subscribed.

[@dennisengelen2517]

So good that our tiny nation of Belgium was amongst all these great nations, especially since this list shows our country 58 years before it even existed. 😂

[@merodrem]

Don't trust this video. If you look at the dates, Belgium appears in the graph before it existed ( before 1830) haha

[@tibihunnia9775]

Belgian national HAHAHA not Vallon or Flamand nations as "Belgian"? Belgian Kongo was 15 million dead . Belgian imperialist colonist country, but not one nation.

[@SnipermanElite]

Because it's an estimation of the GDP of the area that is nowadays Belgium. Same happens with some other countries, like Italy which appears as "Italian States" whilst they were still separated nations.

[@irenaveksler1935]

@@lud2500 15 trillion people don’t live in the drc and never have I’m pretty sure it’s not 15 million dead either I think it was ten million

[@irenaveksler1935]

@@tibihunnia9775 bruh what?

[@laurentius.dominus]

Creo que se está subestimando bastante la importancia económica del *Imperio español.* Durante un lapso largo de tiempo fue un hegemón económico cuya moneda llegó a utilizarse incluso en China. De paso, el inglés o quien sea que hizo el vídeo podría considerar el período de unión dinástica. En ese momento tanto el Imperio español como el portugués _de jure_ se fundieron en uno solo.

[@Luiz_Roberto_A._G._Aguiar]

O rei da Espanha também era o rei de Portugal, por isso tinha essa união, mas não chegou ter fusão nem nada do tipo, então seria burrice contar isso

[@末班车-i2x]

As a Chinese history lover, I’ve never heard that

[@yuumiko3060]

@@末班车-i2x probably because its bs

[@citievisciosesperanton9574]

@@Luiz_Roberto_A._G._Aguiar no sería una tontería, el vídeo cuenta al sacro imperio como un total, cuando lejos de las tierras del emperador, cada estado era independiente, lo único que compartían era monarca, era como un gran estado compuesto de miles estados cuya única cosa en común era el monarca porque aveces ni el idioma Pudo perfectamente sumar las economías de España y Portugal

[@rudolph19]

@@citievisciosesperanton9574 Но в видео не сложили экономику Великобритании и колоний Великобритании. East India company в видео отдельно от Великобритании, полагаю и остальные колонии тоже.

[@moritz9077]

f1 reporter be like "here comes usa!!" "thru goes china!!!"

[@mrcool2107]

And then comes India

[@allenwu8841]

The economic strength of Britain and France has always kept them on this list, and the economies of Germany and Japan have been growing rapidly for decades. After the 20th century, the United States became the number one in the world. China developed gradually in the second half of the 20th century. Impress me.

[@PortugalZeroworldcup]

Ottoman empire, Poland Lithuania used to be great

[@davidreichert9392]

I'd be interested to see thsi with the EU having its own bar (but also keeping the respective individual members)

[@SuperSanic..]

Eu was no1 until 2011/12 when West(mainly france and USA) attacked Libya for their interest and flooded europe with migrants and refugees. They not only took refugees for destroying libya but also lost several trading partners as Libya was the richest African country and many other African countries relied on Libya for loans, investments and remittance.

[@whatifnik.....1611]

EU is doomed now

[@kkpenney444]

That's like saying hey, let's have all of South America on one bar.

[@Rorimac67]

@@kkpenney444 By no means. The EU ist economically a true UNION. There are no trade barriers in between and mayority of EU has even one currency. The economic unification is lightyears ahead of any other kind of trade alliances in the world. You can't even make a trade treaty with one of the EU states, only with the EU as a whole. Trump wanted to make some trade deals with Germany and asked Merkel in some inteviews and she tried repeatedly to explain him that that won't work. Was very funny to see.

[@lucaiervasi8515]

@@Rorimac67 it is absolutely not true, every European country can make commercial agreements independently of the union with any state it wishes without talking to the European institutions. the european union is a set of commercial and economic agreements that concern only the member states and not completely, on the contrary .. in europe each state can use these agreements to take advantage of the other and the system itself generates a movement of capital from poor countries towards the rich countries. the united states of america is a true union, europe doesn't even come close to that concept.

[@JoaquinWeissUgarteche]

When Argentina 🇦🇷 used to be a first world country 1880-1960. Nowadays RIP.

[@CorvusLeukos]

Hay que votar a Milei

[@jeremiasbelon6001]

@@CorvusLeukos nah

[@CorvusLeukos]

@@jeremiasbelon6001 seh

[@jeremiasbelon6001]

@@CorvusLeukos nah, liberalismo es como el abismo, prefiero a un capo de extrema derecha

[@gabriel-ni2jv]

Brasil💪😎terceiro pais com mais alemães germânicos do mundo🇩🇪

[@mishacol]

Europeans knew India and China are rich asf, so they sought the easiest and fastest ways to get there. This is why we know about Vasco Da Gama, Columbus , Magellan etc .

[@mint8648]

In fact the old route through the levant (ottoman) remained superior for a while

[@IrishCinnsealach]

Europe traded with Asia long before Columbus. Columbus was literally commissioned to find a faster trade route to India instead of going round Africa

[@wertyuiopasd6281]

France is rich since the dark ages. Wrong argument. Europeans just own the entire world^^ because they were at war against each other.

[@wertyuiopasd6281]

Asia and Europe were doing trade for centuries. Even chinese envoys were sent to greet the King Louis of France a thousand years ago.

[@MrBdoleagle]

I thought they only knew India, and Magellan and Columbus were actually out for India😂. China is in Far East, most European didn’t know it at all

[@momojafar9385]

The Mughal Empire was something else man, from their architecture to the insane prestige they held. Even after the Marathas took over, they installed a puppet Mughal ruler and then when the British came they did the same because of how much influence the Mughal rulers had over India.

[@mrayangamingkhan]

🥰🥰🥰

[@voniks3035]

Amazing that Polish GPD was bigger than Spain ones when Poland weren't even exist

[@TheKingOfSexyness]

Same with Belgium. It enters the top 15 in 1772 even though it was only founded in 1830.

[@GregoszPL]

Poland weren't exist? What do you mean? In that time Poland was in an Union together with Lithuania and was the biggest country in Europe (russia was nothing at that time). And it was also the next richest country in Europe, right after France(as you can see). Educate yourself than write comments;)

[@voniks3035]

@@GregoszPL Yeah but im talking about 1800s after partitons

[@GregoszPL]

@@voniks3035 ow yeaa, than you're right ser!

[@sdsdsdsd3369]

​​@@voniks3035 Poland was in personal union with Russia. They existed as Polish Kingdom with tsar as polish king.

[@EsrarengizBirisi]

Türkiye and Ottoman Empire ♥️♥️

[@gokaydemirtas9387]

Batmışız, artık söz hakkımız yok maalesef...

[@Mertiven]

@@gokaydemirtas9387 enai

[@zekeriyayuksel8289]

​@@gokaydemirtas9387 boş yapma

[@YoJimBoHugabaJoe]

Any chance of one showing the gdp of entire empires and not each individual part counted as a seperate entity

[@さぶろう15年前]

For some reason, the flag of the Japanese Empire has become the flag of the Imperial Navy.

[@hhah5918]

Japan boost from the 70's is goosebumps

[@disaster7638]

Crazy to see most of the countries that were top economies 400 years ago are still top economies today

[@watchqualityshorts]

Turkey laugh*

[@wertyuiopasd6281]

@@watchqualityshorts 🤣🤣🤣 no empire no plundering no money.

[@Rorimac67]

Most of the countries that had a big population 400 years ago still have. The development deifferences that gave europe and US an edge for 200 years are getting smaller, so population get's the most relevant factor again, as in most time of human history.

[@hugochavez6170]

​@@watchqualityshorts Turkey has to deal with crypto ..ws who destabilize the country every 10 year by military coup. The other stopping factor is the terrorism by the PKK. In 20 years Turkey will be on top 10 countries.

[@loreCarbonell]

@@wertyuiopasd6281Turkey was literally an empire for 700 years, Sherlock

[@KeanoMUFC1]

I hope Poland will come back to the top 15 one day

[@_Polska_.]

Same (Wiem data)

[@michaelbrynkus]

It’s already coming back.

[@AhmedBabiker-sr8fl]

​@@michaelbrynkus nope top 15 country is twice their gdp

[@mahmudii2081]

Surprised that the Netherlands didn't shoot up to the top 3 because the VOC was the most profitable company in the world.

[@DenUitvreter]

Don't believe the stupid YT video's. The VOC was peanuts for the Dutch Republic's economy. Not even 1% of the merchant fleet and even at it's peak around 1650 less profitable than the Dutch herring fishery.

[@minimaxmiaandme.4971]

It is amazing what Canada can accomplish given that our population is so much smaller than the rest of the countries at 38 million.

[@saadshaikh7161]

Thanks to US

[@lisaroberts8556]

Canada’s proximity to the USA is a great benefit.

[@UnbelievablyBased]

We'd do even better without Trudeau

[@tuber420]

you have the U.S to thank for that

[@HellIsInfinite]

French stability is impressive. In top 5 for most of the time in last 400 years.

[@celdur4635]

Has had one of the biggest populations in the world until the middle to late XIX century, after that it was because of industry.

[@aksmex2576]

After you mean colonies?

[@Difdauf]

@@aksmex2576 France didn't lose GDP when they lost their colonies.

[@Richard-vn8me]

@NSX fake news Africa has always cost more than it brought in and the 500 billion never existed it's panafrican propaganda 🤡

[@electricspeedkiller8950]

​@NSX I already know this but reading it again makes me respect the French even more.

[@viserrx]

It's just that the US has never lost so many resources in wars!

[@BladeMK]

They profited from rebuilding europe

[@DiogoSilva-og7tc]

Not the only reason tbf, the US had one of the highest birth rates in the 19th century, has a huge amount of resources, good population, excellent geography and was always super Industrialized. The reason the US is so undisputed is because communism literally destroy its 2 biggest natural rivals: China and Russia.

[@lred1383]

@@DiogoSilva-og7tc China has built itself back up and is now just as wealthy and influential. Russia's having a harder time, but they'll spring back up eventually as well. Nothing lasts forever

[@DiogoSilva-og7tc]

@@lred1383 Not entirely true, both countries, China especially, face demographic collapse in the next decades, if I'm not mistaken the Chinese population is set to halve by the end of the century. I'd say China and Russia lost their window to surpass the US, at least alone. And although the US has huge societal issues, so do China and Russia, maybe to the same degree. The US will definetly lose power but it will still be a force to be reckoned with. The only way I see the US being surpassed is if somehow Russia joins the EU or becomes a Chinese colony. Both are really unlikely at this point.

[@kevinmiller1643]

⁠​⁠@@lred1383 just as wealthy? They have 5 times the population with less GDP

[@domskillet5744]

*The US whenever Europe is at war: "Yeah, it's all coming together"

[@DenUitvreter]

Good times now.

[@jayrayka1499]

India was a very fertile land from the beganing Hindustan Zindabad 🇮🇳

[@theVoid-V]

Muaryan,Gupta,Delhi Saltanate, Mughal

[@vitorpereira5461]

india has a bilion people friend.

[@tauslou5793]

Build more sewage treatment plants.

[@danielwoods3896]

Despite being a relatively small country that lost two world wars and was decimated in constant warfare for hundreds of years while having much fewer colonial possessions than the rest of Europe, Germany is still the 4th strongest economy on earth and the strongest in Europe. That’s quite impressive

[@seanthe100]

There's nothing impressive about it, Germany had a large population and was overstretched by having colonial processions.

[@davidlahaye1202]

The benefits of having so many rivers running throughout the country

[@franckvermont1926]

@@seanthe100 they did not had colonial possessions. But it is not the colonies which make one's country rich

[@userwsyz]

@@franckvermont1926 Are you kidding? Surely colonies had made the European countries rich. For example, the British government received taxes from all of its colonies. You forgot why America became independent. It was for paying taxes.

[@franckvermont1926]

@@userwsyz France lost money with its African colonies

[@TheDenssdd]

US had a huge economic jump during two world wars

[@DiogoSilva-og7tc]

yup they didn't see any combat in their home soil and got filthy rich of selling weapons and supplies to the Europeans. Just to give you a prespective, I've seen the US being described as a floating factory that no one could touch during WW2.

[@lisaroberts8556]

It’s hard to bring War to the USA. A very large Continental Size Country. Rich in resources hardly any need for anything outside of its own borders. Two huge Oceans 🌊 🌊 on both sides. Land locked North and South with two peaceful but weaker nations. The only way to take the USA 🇺🇸 is from within. Guess who’s trying to pull that off? 😮

[@grimmsby3011]

@@DiogoSilva-og7tc With how friendly Canada is to the US and with Mexico's neutrality during the first war and support during the second, it basically turned the US into a continent-wide factory fortress. The idea of America remaining purely neutral throughout the wars is an interesting thought since the amount of supplies sent to Europe was insane.

[@christhedoc8689]

@@grimmsby3011 Mexico neutrality? Mexico got their ass kicked by the US, that's why they have been neutral, they didn't have any option, and Canada has been friends with the US for the past 150 years!! other countries never tried to invade the US or attack them because they have always been a powerhouse, Japan tried, and look what happened. Hitler didn't even think to invade the US, because he knew it would be a suicide mission, if the US is so successful because of where they are located then Australia should be number 1 right?? you communist Putin puppets are a joke!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@christhedoc8689]

@@DiogoSilva-og7tc The US didn't see any combat because they prepared themselves to be a powerhouse and be feared, the US was attacked by the second strongest army in the world in WW2 which was the Japanese Empire, Hitlet never tried to do any harm to the US because he knew it would be a suicide mission, the same with the soviet union. The US fought 2 wars at the same time in WW2 and won both of them. and yes they were described as an untouchable country because it's true, no country had the power to invade US soil in WW2. if the location would have played a big part then Australia would be the biggest powerhouse ever 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@black_circle322]

7:36 This was mexico at its peak in power. I find it weird how mexico became the 8th richest country for a year.

[@병1244기-d8u]

As a Korean, the fact that Joseon (kingdom of korean peninsula) was one of top 15 in 1600~1629 is impressive to me because korea at that time couldn’t recovered the damage from war against Japan and Qing.

[@张零陆]

한국은 중국과 너무 가깝다

[@chris-un7nr]

Joseon dynasty has a cosiderable economic scale compare to other countries relatively. at thtat time, it established a strong regime

[@hojoohong6682]

I like this video.👍👍👍

[@Sunflower-cm9sc]

The generation of our grandfather has suffered the hardships of three generations and gained peace. The generation of our parents has suffered the hardships of two generations and gained economy. It is not easy. We will continue this spirit.I love my country,welcome to China.

[@LRomano]

🇮🇹❤️🇨🇳❤️🇰🇵❤️🇷🇺

[@blackchrysler]

China was the #1 strongest country for all of world history. Only in 1800s they became weak but now they are on the rise again and they are destined to become the world power again, just like it has been for 4000 years.

[@aakash777]

China can access KZbin??

[@blackchrysler]

@@aakash777 yeah they just watch their own shit usually

[@whenisdinner2137]

@@blackchrysler more like without a VPN they have no choice but to watch their own stuff

[@p80mod]

Nice start for Poland! Would probably be even better if the video started with 1500s - that was Poland's golden age.

[@y.d.8656]

Got no idea why Poland is here as a separate country in 1800s, when it actually used to be a part of three empires

[@lothar3610]

@@y.d.8656Duchy of Warsaw to Congress Poland my friend. Read about it.

[@p80mod]

@@y.d.8656 Because it had a separate economy

[@niyazisunay9839]

1500s-1600s was for ottomans and for poland golden age

[@crabisland2336]

1600년대 조선이 Top15 안에 들었던게 신기하네

[@AdistuffRBX]

4:35 when a British company has more money then every single country including the British empire itself

[@bumba5897]

Qing dynasty?

[@AdistuffRBX]

@@bumba5897 I forgo 💀 They weren’t a country though, they were an empire.

[@bumba5897]

@@AdistuffRBX k

[@mrcool2107]

@@AdistuffRBX dude country and empire is same thing

[@AdistuffRBX]

@@mrcool2107 empire has colonies so actually no

[@totallynotsomeoneelse8075]

Ok your info for British east India company is wrong It did not take until 1700 for the brits to fully replace the Mughals that was during the 1800s and also the Marathas were the major empire at the time not the Mughals

[@KevinLLH]

6:24 can obviously tell who was profiting most from WW2

[@NewRepublicMapper]

5:27 US be like in 1887: *GAS GAS GAS*

[@biggiedii4889]

Australia doing really well considering their small population.

[@alisgrin2524]

Sí y sobre todo teniendo en cuenta que los aborígenes, legalmente formaban parte de la FAUNA, hasta 1965...

[@IhaveBigFeet]

But they have unlimited resources, the impressive one is South Korea which yes has more people but is maybe 4% the size of australia with no natural resources.

[@IhaveBigFeet]

My bad South Korea is 1.1% the size of Australia.

[@biggiedii4889]

@@IhaveBigFeet "The most important reserves are of anthracite coal, iron ore, graphite, gold, silver, tungsten, lead, and zinc, which together constitute some two-thirds of the total value of mineral resources." Straight from Google. South Korea is also a big rice producer.

[@3ColorJaguar]

I dont think spain was that poor during the 1600s-1700s, it literaly ruled half of the planet

[@heretyk321]

But in entire California and many for sure others places lived like around 5 thousands people. And they have never been especially great with economy 😅

[@bharatyaswaraj5641]

Economy is not based on land size but people and its productivity

[@danielwoods3896]

@@bharatyaswaraj5641 True, but Spain owned literally almost the entire new world and had massive gold reserves.

[@bharatyaswaraj5641]

@@danielwoods3896 gdp is not wealth but production per year, gold reserves are wealth thus dont show up in gdp figures.

[@bharatyaswaraj5641]

@daniel halachev yes mineral extraction is part of gdp but that doesnt necesserily make its gdp as big as the empires with high population. For example saudi Arabia have a large reserves of oil and mineral extraction is big part of their gdp but still their overall gdp is not in the top 10. At the same time countries high population country like india and brazil with a lot of people under poverty are in the top 10gdp. So a country's population influences the manufacturing power of that country.

[@Civitas_pix]

Great work 👏 well done 👏

[@atanasvasilev3228]

You know what is strange? That Russia was bigger economy then France in the early 1800s but had the same amount of population back then.

[@SlowTheBlack]

Nothing strange, during the reign of Catherine the Great Russia was a leader in many important branches of industry and commerce, as well as in several monopolies, its technology was not inferior, and in some places even superior to most of the rest of Europe, this was even after her death, in fact until the 30s of the 19th century

[@atanasvasilev3228]

@@SlowTheBlack I don't say it's strange. The strange part is that Russia stopped being economical leader. They deserve it, but the west probably after Napoleon's defeat united to sabotage Russia every chance they have.

[@SlowTheBlack]

@@atanasvasilev3228 russia was mainly restricted in the market, they tried to block it in the Mediterranean Sea, but also russia missed the chance for a rapid transition to efficient methods of industrial development in the 19th century, largely due to the serf system, and was able to catch up only in the early 20th century, after the first revolution in 1905 growth rates were no less than in the usa, while more than in Germany and other European countries, but then was the first world war and civil war and russia simply lost many people, land and its infrastructure was in a bad state

[@atanasvasilev3228]

@@SlowTheBlack Yes, nice summary.

[@mordegardglezgorv2216]

I’m Russian and for me it’s more stranger thing that we were 4th in the World in 1630-1640. Cause in our historical conception we were the backward country with no progress and many uprisings in this time. We have only one port in Europe - Archangelsk and only Piotr the Great in 18 century saved us from Moscowian barbarism and led to Europe lighting. That all we usually learn at school. Yes, I know about 30 years war, but it’s fun fact for me in any case

[@robincrypto4748]

Germany : A High Stable Economy is vital for a prolonged W.. Others : prolonged what? Germany : Umm.. nothing

[@heywoodyablom]

Polska so strong, we go up even if we didn't exist

[@Svyatoslav13.16]

you have been divided 6 times )

[@harpunonosy1232]

​@@Svyatoslav13.16 russian řéțářđ never been to school

[@Bobbydazzlla]

And there's Australia with their tiny 25 million population saying "fuck you Jack, I'm alright" to the rest of the world while they hold our beer.

[@frank-js9nf]

in past 5000 years ,exceeds 85% time ,China was the first largest econimic on earth , denasity by denasity , lasting and continuing

[@FBI.capturo.gente.rara.]

In the thirteen colonies for a long time the reals of 8 were used since the English did not have enough ore to make enough coins for the settlers of the thirteen colonies

[@olddogoddments675]

Lack of coinage also led to a proliferation of paper money. Each colony issued its own "promises to pay", which got trusted to varying degrees. But without money flowing in other forms than precious metals they/the US could not have developed as they/it did.

[@Hentez1]

How from 1815 to 1900 Poland has any economy if they hadnt even independence

[@onurarslan5680]

they had independence, depends on the recognition of the others, like Turkey had independence btw 1923-1933 but not recognised

[@bn0372]

Can we just talk about how the ottoman empire just slowly died out from top 3 to oblivion...

[@SaadAliArts]

India and China dominated World economy for centuries until destroyed by colonialism. Both Giants are now rising again. Respect for both great nations ❤️🇮🇳❤️🇨🇳❤️

[@donovan4105]

If they were so great, how come they were able to be colonized?💀

[@thunderbird1921]

And now they're turning against each other. It's going to be one of the largest geopolitical rivalries on earth this century if the feud continues on its current path.

[@iamajeeeep]

since when was china colonised?

[@ASR1L-]

@@iamajeeeepHong kong, Macau, Manchuria, Tianjin and the Kiautschou Bay. 💀

[@iamajeeeep]

@@ASR1L- first of all all of those all are special administrative regions of china. second of all china as a whole was never colonized by anyone. only small parts of it were

[@dmandal.jaalcar]

How do you get all these detailed data? What are the sources for the figures you quote with 10 digit accuracy? 😱 Are you sure so much accurate results exist from 3 centuries ago?

[@herisruns]

they definitely don't have access to precise data for every month of every year for every large economy. some of countries probably have one data point per year, or less. and they're not precise to the dollar. at the end of the video, all of the figures are rounded to the nearest million dollars. the graphing program just assumes that the numbers change at a constant rate between data points, so you see the numbers change at every second of the video and you see all manner of unrounded numbers

[@juho480]

7:38 China 🇨🇳 after 2003 became a rocket 🚀

[@mrcool2107]

But fall down quickly because Chinese product doesn't last long

[@nukejapandie5913]

@@mrcool2107 in your wildest dreams, your country can't even procure your toilet stuff for poop

[@bharatyaswaraj5641]

@@mrcool2107 but still is going to be higher than usa anyway.

[@malopephasha5341]

@@bharatyaswaraj5641 just like how Japan was gonna surpass USA or how Soviet union was gonna pass usa

[@bharatyaswaraj5641]

@@malopephasha5341 except that china have 4 times more people than usa

[@brandonbuckles826]

The fact that the East India Company was #2 and many times that of the #3 for the better part of a century is wild.

[@adrianredzik725]

You included Poland during the time when there was no Poland on the map, where did you get those numbers?

[@kalacaptain4818]

We made it up 🤷‍♀️

[@lothar3610]

Congress Poland - puppet state of Russia.

[@comments94]

In case of India the transition was from Mughal to Maratha Empire to East India Company and not directly from Mughals to EIC.

[@AnarchistDoc]

😂😂😂😂 what???

[@aaryan_B055]

Yes. British took over MARATHAS as mughals were already defeated by MARATHAS. ​@@AnarchistDoc

[@nilocblue]

Insane how Canada was consistently up there considering how much smaller their population is compared to the others.

[@Prairielander]

I'm Canadian and I feel like our country is getting worse now. The economy is just debt and useless government jobs.

[@thunderbird1921]

@@Prairielander As an American, I'm seriously worried what those wildfires are going to do to you guys economically. Isn't your logging industry a critical aspect? This could be disastrous for your economy if your needed forests are getting taken out.

[@Skanzool]

Canada doesn't exist, it's a branch plant economy of the US. Without the US it would have nothing. It hasn't even been able to develop a domestic car industry. It's entire car manufacturing economy is American. Next.

[@adrianmolina1211]

-Argentina, que haces ahí? -Me anotó un amigo

[@Redstoner34526]

Surprised not to see the Netherlands higher in the earlier area even though the VOC in the 1600s was worth trillions of dollars also where are all the colonial empires?

[@angelodellisanti3601]

looks odd that between the 70's and 90's italy gdp was higher than uk

[@lucaiervasi8515]

Italy had its peak in 1990, where it reached the fourth position in the world. then the policies of preparation for the entry of the single currency began. something that the country has not digested now, has not digested in 2000 and still does not digest. but you know, we Italians like to hit the first time and then always keep hitting the same wall. we are masochists

[@mpauloperes]

7:14 1981-1998 China 🤝 Brazil 1999 China: 👋"Bye bye Brazil" 2022 China 💪= 11x Brazil

[@gloriousrevolutionary2306]

What sources are you using for this? GDP is virtually impossible to measure for any country prior to WW2, take this data with a grain of salt.

[@Kairon111161]

I wish that the methodology were somewhat different in the 1600-1900 era, because to actually see a nation's relative strength and size compared to the other top powers, you have to include their overseas territorial possessions and colonies -- Spain looks so small in 1600, when in reality, it should definitely be one of the top 3 at least, it seems to me. I don't mind separating out the British Raj, if it is so named -- then one can easily do the calculation of adding the two up, to see the real British footprint in 1900.

[@Knightfire66]

yes britain slole 80% of indias economy/money. but the guy did it right. you have to show people indias real power. and what europeans were without theyre evil colonization. of course british gdp number is boosted by that colonies. without the they would die from hunger.

[@shivanshdubey431]

​@@Knightfire66"Always the strongest men comes out victorious" we've been taught that ashoka was the great but how was he great? He was great because he faught for his ppl so that his ppl can live better life by taking wealth of other smaller kingdoms that's what britishers did in this planet we're here to fight to be the most powerful its not their fault that they beat us for the better living of their ppl its our fault that we couldn't defend ourselves that we're not the strongest remember brother no one cares about a loser just a small reality check for ya nobody cares man the history is wrote by the winners they did what a country should for their ppl in their timeline now its different but at their time it was not even in India mughals and marathas were chopping each others head off for the power for the wealth and for their ppl

[@intermilan9731]

​@@Knightfire66LooooL. Indian kings betrayed one another just to azzlick Britian. Greed and power led to India's downfall. Very few kings like Tipu sultan actually resisted the British.

[@laurentius.dominus]

Quien hizo el vídeo lo hizo con un claro estigma en contra de España -incluyendo sus territorios de ultramar-.

[@ibraheemkhan6660]

​@laurentius.dominus having territory isn't the same as the economy. This isn't a total-land chart.

[@kbob5427]

The fact that Canada is so young and has such a small population and yet is one of the richest countries is impressive

[@loganmoreland7394]

They ride the coattails of the states. Benefits of being neighbors with the largest economy lol

[@jamiealger7246]

But canada‘s economy is shrinking now

[@maxdenbreejen9844]

40mil definetly not a small population mate

[@mixtapemania6769]

​@@maxdenbreejen9844 it's literally smaller than all the countries that are below it (for 2022)

[@maxdenbreejen9844]

@@mixtapemania6769 Peru, Venezuela, Chili, Equador, Guatemala, Bolivia, Haiti, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Paraguay, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Uruguay, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, Suriname, Belize, Bahamas, Barbados, Saint Luca, Grenada, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica and Saint Kitts and Nevis are literally all under canada and have a smaller population. There are actually only 5 countries in the Americas with a higher population.

[@user-b7ur3yu2b]

6:42 when the ussr almost attempted to beat the usa economy

[@AleExocet]

Where did you get the historical data to produce this video?

[@Momonosuke321]

From his ass

[@britishasianradio]

Respect to Japan and Germany , even losing WW2 both are in top 4.

[@maisamsadigi1658]

Germany is in Europa that’s normal

[@giulioB__88]

​@@maisamsadigi1658Greece and Bulgaria are not in Europe? Still they didn't hit top 4

[@grimmsby3011]

@@maisamsadigi1658 They got close to America, that's why their economies boomed.

[@shaansingh6048]

@@maisamsadigi1658 Evidently not because Germany is the only European country in the top 4 lmao

[@barrettbritt]

It’s incredible to see how much capacity the US has in war time. In each world war, the US gdp increased so much more and so much quicker than any others

[@MMOfreakOUT1]

Lend-Lease mate. Provide Ressources = Profit.

[@obinator9065]

Maybe not being on the continent where the war took place helps?

[@Cid-4-Cid]

了解一下美国的历史，这就是一部军工复合体的发家史

[@matthiasbehrendt6112]

It's primarly based on the devaluesation of the currency.

[@DakotaTheRota]

​@@MMOfreakOUT1The USA did not benefit from land lease, at least not economically, only a couple countries paid the USA back. The big one was the UK, most didn't pay it back and even some pretend they did not get some or at times heavily downplays the amount given. Namely the Soviet Union heavily downplayed the amount given to them through land lease. I think you need to read a book.

[@MEGIDIOT]

Now do one with the countries where economic wealth is most equitably shared among the population.

[@shasha0076]

Small countries will always top in that. Less people more resources 🤣🙌

[@Gpmaster1234]

Why you provide Wrong information 😅 Where is MARATHA Empire First Mughals to MARATHA Empire then British india

[@박은재-b6f]

China is really the richest until now

[@박은재-b6f]

@@Deepak_Dhakad lol india is a colony of british before

[@jirachi-wishmaker9242]

@@박은재-b6f Indian history doesn't start with British.

[@saanjanibaar8085]

@@jirachi-wishmaker9242 Mughal Herem to British servanthood 😂

[@jirachi-wishmaker9242]

@@saanjanibaar8085 ignorance

[@breezemont1161]

@@saanjanibaar8085 Don't tell me you're from Poopistan 🇵🇰?