very comprehensive, very interesting, very engaging. You're the saviour for all those lost souls who missed the opportunity to study latin at school
@bobthabuilda15253 жыл бұрын
I second this. I'm making up for the classical education I didn't receive in youth, and this channel has been ridiculously helpful.
@josetomashameaudavanzo49543 жыл бұрын
I totally agree with you guys. Greetings from Chile!
@anushjohn6 жыл бұрын
Seriously, these short lectures are so brilliant. Well explained and concise. Thank you!
@commentfreely54434 жыл бұрын
being a slave is sad being an owner of a human is happy
@stevemyntti51872 жыл бұрын
I agree fully.
@stevemyntti51872 жыл бұрын
... with Anush
@pungkutspapowinisumpuvtuku1957 жыл бұрын
You are the greatest latin teacher alive Let me love you
@sidstone88454 жыл бұрын
Mine is better
@commentfreely54434 жыл бұрын
it's about students not teachers
@thedank0r1623 жыл бұрын
Magnissimus vivus Latinitatis magister es Sine me amare te (Is this correct?)
@maritacrozier32569 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate these videos. They make Latin seem so simple and clear. Your voice is calming rather than over-stimulating, as is the case in a lot of instructional videos. It makes it easier for me to focus. Thanks for making them available.
@latintutorial9 жыл бұрын
+Marita Crozier Thanks! My goal is to make good, appropriate videos that teach first of all.
@danielhobbyist3 жыл бұрын
Years after the creation of this video it is helping me so much today. I love the internet.
@buttelatin14465 жыл бұрын
Most textbooks introduce 1st and 2nd declension adjectives first. I think this is a huge mistake because it convinces students that Declension = gender, and that adjectives always have the same ending as the noun that they describe, neither of which is true. So when the students are later introduced to 3rd declension adjectives, their heads explode (umbraliter), or they ask "what gender is 3rd Declension?" and/or they still give all adjectives the same ending as the noun even when they are different declensions. I am convinced that it is better pedagogy to introduce 3rd declension adjectives first, and later the 1st & 2nd Declension adjectives after the students have learned at least 3 noun declensions. Of course, learning noun/adjective agreement is difficult for English speaking students; I do not know a way to make it easy for new students of Latin. By the way, your video lessons are excellent. Keep up the good work.
@rafazardly3 жыл бұрын
you're right. I'm almost desperate, not by the class, but by the density of Latin itself, and I'm a romanic language native speaker, lol. But since I'm proficient in English I find these lectures here very useful!
@Channel-zb1fi5 ай бұрын
@@rafazardly Just have to turn the act of conjugating things into a game of spotting patterns and remembering sounds.
@hungergamesking7 жыл бұрын
I take 6th grade Latin in a private school in California. I have my Pre-Comprehensive exams coming up, and I think your videos will help me a lot! Gratiās tibi ago! Tu est optimum!
@soli86154 жыл бұрын
hungergamesking Frater, non est ‘tu est’, est tu es.
@existentialchaos83 жыл бұрын
Tu est?? You mean tu es.
@berkleypearl23636 жыл бұрын
If there is anything that I will remember until the day I die is that adjectives agree with the nouns they describe in case, number, and gender. My Latin teacher made sure that it was the one thing that we would always remember
@thomascohen99244 жыл бұрын
Your lectures are very clear and informative. Thank you!
@lydianathenson82016 жыл бұрын
This is the best latin tutorial video ever, it literally made me so happy that I can understand and thank you so much!
@nintendojoshua81309 жыл бұрын
I love your videos! They helped me in studying for my first JCL competition where I got first place in both of my categories! Gratiās tibi ago!
@latintutorial9 жыл бұрын
Gratulationes!
@soli86154 жыл бұрын
5:20 Can we just say Mīlitem fortem salutābam?
@latintutorial4 жыл бұрын
Yes
@pablomunoz31194 жыл бұрын
That's the way you would say it normally, if you were having a conversation, unless you wanted to emphasize that you was *you* doing the action
@johnlee-ii4ye3 жыл бұрын
So when learning adjectives you MUST learn what declension they conjugate as, in order to apply the endings correctly?
@BrahamHichem4 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your great efforts you have been making
@la-civetta6 жыл бұрын
Mantra of the day: Let's make our master happy.
@googleuser24794 жыл бұрын
I have a question: Why does the nominative case verb always come first? Also, I play the piano and maestro means sad in music language. Makes sense that’s why when I was 9 years old my mom said I would learn Latin when I’m older. Very helpful videos!
@ekoi19954 жыл бұрын
how do you do two or more adjectives describing a noun? Like, "your small handsome dog"?
@JoeMiyagi8 жыл бұрын
These videos are really well done! Does anybody know what the font being used is?
@latintutorial8 жыл бұрын
+JoeMiyagi Hoefler Text
@JoeMiyagi8 жыл бұрын
+latintutorial Thanks, it's a nice choice.
@latintutorial8 жыл бұрын
JoeMiyagi Thanks! I'm a Baskerville guy for a lot of my regular writing, but that font doesn't seem to do the job on videos. It's too light and delicate. Hoefler really seems to give the same elegance as Baskerville, while having the necessary weight that Baskerville lacks.
@__donez__4 жыл бұрын
Do you have videos on comparatives and superlatives? Grātiās tibi agō
@Dillonjd179 жыл бұрын
1) Awesome work, sir! I can't say how much this helped me develop my conscious awareness and confidence in understanding of Latin opération. 2) OMFG, bro! Talk Nerdy to me! Not sure if it's your vocal control or the intelligence of your speaking/teaching; but, DAMN!
@damom68204 жыл бұрын
Is there any videos on how to describe verbs?
@latintutorial4 жыл бұрын
I’ve got tons of them!
@infinitesimotel5 жыл бұрын
3:49 This is a really blasted sentence when you transpose it to English: The girl in the large house beautiful was sitting. Could it not be mistaken for the girl in the large beautiful house was sitting/ the girl was sitting in the large beautiful house?
@avzarathustra61645 жыл бұрын
No. Remember that magna is ablative here. Magna could not refer to the girl because the girl, puella, is in the nominative.
@avzarathustra61645 жыл бұрын
Pulchra can only refer to the girl, because they are both nominative.
@anniepark66946 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! This makes a lot of sense now. I don't know if you already have, but you should do like an intro to all the Latin parts of speech.
@jwanmustafa6703 жыл бұрын
3:01 But how do we know if it is HIS happy master
@stephenkong31554 жыл бұрын
May i ask “you will be happy” when translated to latin, is the word happy in latin going to be in the nominative case since you is in the nominative? Im confused 😖 please help
@rayen_daadaa4 жыл бұрын
Ave. Your sentence can be translated into "Eris laetus" Because *laetus* is a predicate it must be in the nominative case. If "you" is feminine then you would say: "Eris laeta" I found this on the internet about the predicate. I Hope it will be helpful ☺www.brighthubeducation.com/learning-translating-latin/36481-identify-latin-predicate-words/#:~:text=Predicate%20words%20are%20those%20that,the%20subject%20of%20a%20sentence.&text=Both%20English%20and%20Latin%20use,but%20between%20the%20two%20words.️ Happy learning!
@chamorvenigo11 ай бұрын
If you are confused, you should ask why. For now, you could try "leaturus", "tibi leaturus", and "tibi leaturus sum".
@louischvs93953 жыл бұрын
what happens when you try to coordinate two nouns with different gender ? "dominus et rosa pulcra sunt"? or "pulcræ sunt" or "pulcri sunt"? and what about "templum et dominus" and "templum et rosa"?
@edranegranne89457 жыл бұрын
I hope you can help even though this comment released 2 years after the video. I was wondering if (Nox Principatus) translates to "Dark Supremacy - "Dark" being defined as "Ominous/Shady/Cryptic/Grim" and Supremacy as "Control/Power/Governance". Do I get the word type and order right and is "Principatus" rightly placed as a plural noun? Couldn't find the plural for Principles or Principalities, basically defining "government" or "rule". Gratia :)
@emilymay85314 жыл бұрын
Oof, I know that THIS is THREE years after your question... Yes, it would. The plural of principatus is...principatus. BUT it would be more accurate to say "nox imperium." Slightly different word, with more of the connotation you're going for. Hope you're not too weirded out that an answer magically appeared after three years.
@edranegranne89454 жыл бұрын
Not too weirded out to accept an answer :) much appreciated. I'm writing something and wanting a Title based in Latin. I would have chosen "Nox Imperium" but it feels a little narrow definition to use the word Empire. It's also kinda cliche since it's been used many often so I'm searching for different word to stand out. I'm looking for a synonym that equate all the worlds "government sovereignty" (Monarchy, Republic, Princedom (Holy Roman Empire), Socialist State (USSR); I assume that word could be "Principatus" based on "princeps" meaning first head.. but I'm not sure if the tone is right. The context of the story is that all government in the world is plotting against each other is a shady and complicated way vying for world, continental or regional dominance. Currently the title is just "Principatus" to make it simpler. If you could help in any way, I'll be surely grateful.
@potatoking414 Жыл бұрын
Haec videos sunt optima!! (No such thing as videos in Ancient Rome)
@fehmit1604 жыл бұрын
Can someone tell me what does "mirum corvum" means or is it wrong cuz the adjective comes first? Must be corvum mirum? I already know corvum must be corvus, crow or raven...
@latintutorial4 жыл бұрын
“Amazing crow” (but in the accusative case, receiving the action of some verb). Don’t worry about word order - it’s a lot more fluid in natural Latin than we teachers tend to state.
@itgirlmiyuki7 жыл бұрын
I don't understand.......I'm so stupid
@anniepark66946 жыл бұрын
Miyuki Hey, it's all right. You're not stupid, just new to this probably, like I am. Like for me, I've realized I need to slow down in what I watch on this channel, not because the content is bad but because I'm a beginner and the content is presented a little fast for a beginner who is solely learning from sound and KZbin right now. This video is good, though.
@nellie61987 жыл бұрын
This really helped thank you so much!
@christopherjholland5 жыл бұрын
Latin Parents must have had a tough time teaching their children about all these declensions.
@bilbohob71794 жыл бұрын
Latin parents simply... speak latin...
@TheZenytram4 жыл бұрын
do you teach grammar to your kid while growing up and learning how to talk.
@christopherjholland4 жыл бұрын
@@TheZenytram Kids don't really need to know what a noun, verb, clause, preposition, etc are to be able to talk. It was a joke.
@no85922 жыл бұрын
Of course not, but there were school institutes of grammar common in Rome.
@theflyingbrick3876 жыл бұрын
good video
@AVPalmerERY3 жыл бұрын
My teachers making us watch this
@latintutorial3 жыл бұрын
And I am soooo sorry about that.
@thiagol.71183 жыл бұрын
greaaat channel
@ClearOutSamskaras2 жыл бұрын
Why do you say that in the first sentence "The slave is greeting HIS master"? I see nothing in the sentence to make us commit to the idea that this master is specifically the master of this slave. The meaning of the sentece you gave could just as well be: "The slave is greeting A master." The master in that sentence might just be some slave holder who happens to be around (visiting the home of the slave's actual master, as an example). Don't you need to use a latin word for "his" for this sentence to be the way you claim it is? Similarly: "The girl's is sitting in a large house" Your second example had the same structure as the slave sentence. However, in the second sentence you don't say the girl is sitting in HER house. You simply say that she is sitting in A house. This seems totally the right way to interpret this sentence because no latin word for "Hers" is in the sentence. But you can't have it both ways: why do you assume a possessive pronoun in sentence 1, but you don't assume a possessive pronoun in sentence 2? Both sentences have the exact same structure.