This episode has a great ending. Essentially the defendant claims he was racially harassed at work and that after the racial harassment escalated he killed his co-worker during an argument. McCoy's counter is that racism is severely diminished in the modern day (he argues it practically doesn't exist) and isn't enough emotional abuse to justify killing. The jury convicts the Defendant, and on the way home after the trial McCoy and Kincaide are summoning a cab. A cab pulls up and while McCoy starts to get in, Kincaide points out that another African-American man down the street had been waiting longer and was skipped. As the African-American man angrily throws his hands up at the cab, the cab driver simply asks McCoy if he's getting in. The episode ends with McCoy realizing that perhaps racism isn't completely eradicated in modern society.
@ccvv111910 ай бұрын
Thing is throughout the trial you found out he was definitely racially harassed he hates his race too a regular Clarence Thomas but I’m glad the jury saw through the “black rage” defense
@jexelbur687210 ай бұрын
That is… wow. That’s a bold argument to make, even for McCoy. I don’t think being discriminated against is reason to kill someone, but to say that racism practically doesn’t exist (whether directly or not) is a short-sighted tactic. Even if it’s to convict a person who the evidence says is guilty.
@benivinson36933 ай бұрын
i mean i feel like McCoy would know thats not true, like racism is 100% not as bad as the sixties, not eve n close but it still exists in many forms.
@Toneill0293 ай бұрын
@@benivinson3693 MCoy seems to believe in anything that will ensure he wins in court at any given time.
@marksmith394723 күн бұрын
@@Toneill029Mccoy has the ethics of an alley cat
@NonSenseMcGee Жыл бұрын
"Without motive you couldnt convince a jury water's wet." Subtle and hilarious Adam. 😂
@christopherwalker5878 Жыл бұрын
“Just because I know how to scramble eggs doesn’t mean I made breakfast.” He had some hilarious dry one liners that often go unnoticed, but they’re great.
@vinceedwards3978 Жыл бұрын
Sciff did get some great lines!
@aileensmith6806 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@NonSenseMcGee Жыл бұрын
@@mychatpalace😂
@WadeAlma Жыл бұрын
Water isn’t wet, water makes things wet.
@ryang183 Жыл бұрын
For those who do not know, Greer is played by Courtney Vance who went on to portray ADA Carver on Law and Order Criminal Intent
@Iamkcs2c Жыл бұрын
I was listening to this and his voice threw me.
@johnofmalta7 ай бұрын
Seaman Beaumont says it’s Paganini.
@josephdell80564 ай бұрын
His voice is the dead give away!
@AndyBluebear-fi9om3 ай бұрын
Quite a few members of the cast appeared in guest roles before being part of the main cast.
@themermaidstale50083 ай бұрын
And a brief tour of duty on The Closer.
@Tulane_Gargoyle Жыл бұрын
"We would be remiss if we weren't ready to challenge his credibility". Now THAT is brilliant.
@ktom5262 Жыл бұрын
One of the best shows ever. So well written and diected, and very consistently over the years.
@intldawn Жыл бұрын
“What psychic are you planning to call as your first witness?” I fucking love Adam 😂
@DrakeSmith-tn6ij9 ай бұрын
Steven Hill did a great job as Schiff.
@metamorphicme9378Ай бұрын
OG savage!😂😂😂😂
@marksmith394723 күн бұрын
I'm so glad he is serving the American people in congress now
@marianaguardiaa.k.amariana4780 Жыл бұрын
The criminals never understand that almost nothing can escape to the forensics
@kreigguardsman3355 Жыл бұрын
Sadly that isn’t as true in real life
@marianaguardiaa.k.amariana4780 Жыл бұрын
@@kreigguardsman3355Yeep, but dreaming it's free
@dmf1301 Жыл бұрын
Also that wasn’t as true in the 1990s. Forensic science has advanced greatly over the decades, but Lenny Briscoe and Mike Logan were paired together in the 90s for their episodes.
@marianaguardiaa.k.amariana4780 Жыл бұрын
@@dmf1301 That's true too
@jaimeduncan6167 Жыл бұрын
The police either and plant a lot.
@curtisberard7831 Жыл бұрын
"I graduated from..." Age does not denote maturity *Education does not denote intelligence.* Wealth and social status does not denote class. Volume does not denote veracity.
@newellaorbana Жыл бұрын
Good. Homeless Bob do your dental work, You will save a ton of money!
@woodwyrm10 ай бұрын
@@newellaorbana Considering this was shot in the nineties, I suspect Mr Bud Greer made it in to Harvard on a Affirmative Action ticket lel, so in effect, Bud Greer _is_ the homeless man fixing to die.
@chetthehoss9 ай бұрын
@@woodwyrm Oh goodie! Another brainwashed soul who has a lack of understanding about affirmative action and diversity initiatives.
@mikekling71442 ай бұрын
It doesn't matter in prison 😂
@jayman105 Жыл бұрын
"Do your thing, Lenny."
@jeffreysnydr8 ай бұрын
Should have stuck to the convience stores bud."
@September2004 Жыл бұрын
0:03 I like that forensic accountant.
@metamorphicme9378 Жыл бұрын
An awfully excited forensic accountant 😂😂😂😂
@Jodacro-it4zz Жыл бұрын
Is that courtney b vance aka ada carver from criminal intent
@billcox8870 Жыл бұрын
And after he comes out of the joint, he is Ada Carver😂
@Jaren929 Жыл бұрын
From Criminal Intent
@billcox8870 Жыл бұрын
@@Jaren929 absolutely correct!
@teodorusdikypermadi Жыл бұрын
No freakin way
@DaneOrschlovsky Жыл бұрын
Amazing how that works 😂
@billcox8870 Жыл бұрын
@DaneOrschlovsky they do tend to recycle actors. The woman who played lieutenant Anita Van Buren played a mother of a child in one of the first three seasons of the original Law & Order
@jmckdekalb316 Жыл бұрын
From suspect to lawyer on their series
@viettungtruong2660 Жыл бұрын
That’s Courney B. Vance, he played ADA Ron Carver in Criminal Intent
@moodyblues1273 Жыл бұрын
Angela Bassett's husband.
@ifeelpretty5790 Жыл бұрын
And won an Emmy for playing Johnnie Cochran in American Crime Story!
@JedEmpleo Жыл бұрын
Don't forget, Sonar Tech Jones from Hunt for Red October
@Melina-fi3sc Жыл бұрын
That's funny.... Courtney B. Vance as a criminal 🤣 He was a D.A. in Law & Order: Criminal Intent.
@misterwhipple28709 ай бұрын
That wasn't the ONLY thing he was . . . if I elaborated, they'd kick me off KZbin.
@juliantapia1407Ай бұрын
@@misterwhipple2870 ?😮
@stevenwiederholt7000 Жыл бұрын
I was a Security Policeman (back when dinosaurs walked the earth :-)). One Sat. night a Colonel comes up to the EC (entry control point) with some civilians. They are all fairly Hammered, and he wants to bring them on to the flight line. I ask him to wait, and he plays the Don't You Know Who I Am game.Long story short, He's eating through a straw and I don't know where he went, but I never saw him again. 2 games you do NOT want to play with Law Enforcement 1. Don't You Know Who I Am! and related The Attitude Game. Nothing good comes from them.
@nyosito Жыл бұрын
Should have stuck to the convenience stores Bud
@myrnalaboy2840 Жыл бұрын
No one outruns forensics
@frostgfx Жыл бұрын
This was Enron only in the 90s.
@ashb7846 Жыл бұрын
Oh there were so many big fraud scandals prior to Enron, but I think Enron was the one that forced laws to change because it happened on such a huge scale. I wonder if this was based somewhat on Bankers Trust since it took place in NY but idk. Or I wonder if this episode was based on all the rumors of fraud with companies like Enron and Arthur Anderson but before investigators actually had enough evidence gathered to make charges.
@ItsAllLove4Real Жыл бұрын
I love how they recycle their actors😆
@javierpatag3609 Жыл бұрын
The good news is that most of them are good actors anyway, so welcome back. 🙂
@ExplorerDS6789 Жыл бұрын
A lot of TV shows do that. Someone guest stars one season, the next season they plan a recurring character.
@ItsAllLove4Real Жыл бұрын
@@ExplorerDS6789 I know
@ItsAllLove4Real Жыл бұрын
@@javierpatag3609 Okay
@glambertgurl1117 Жыл бұрын
@@javierpatag3609Yes, especially Jerry Orbach. I mean, I wasn't around when he was a big name in Hollywood, not that he isn't now, but I have great respect for him and other older actors. If it weren't for them, movies and shows wouldn't be what they are now.
@metamorphicme9378 Жыл бұрын
Logan retires NYPD and goes on to be Mr Big😂
@UNIT2948 ай бұрын
They pretty much just described the entire Enron scheme.
@alex1vid5 ай бұрын
What a U-Turn... to think he'd turn into an ADA later! lol
@MuzzyBarker Жыл бұрын
Okay, but if the detectives were within their rights to open the drawer in search of other items related to elements of the crime, why wouldn't they have the right to look at something in that drawer?
@MainDrainStudios Жыл бұрын
prosecution did make that point, and made it well. and as the clip shows, the problem ended up being that the warrant is for 'elements of the crime', and the judge declared that 'motive' is not an 'element of the crime'
@boredlawyer3382 Жыл бұрын
The 4th Amendment protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures." It has to be both. They might have had the right to look into the drawer, but not just take anything there. And financial records are not obvious evidence of a murder, the way, say, a gun or a bloody knife would be.
@MuzzyBarker Жыл бұрын
@@MainDrainStudios But at the point that the drawer is open, it's in plain view.
@RLucas3000 Жыл бұрын
@@MuzzyBarker they are saying even though paper such as financial records aren’t an obvious indicator of a crime the way a bloody knife or bloody clothes they might have found inside the drawer.
@newellaorbana Жыл бұрын
@@MuzzyBarker They were looking for murder evidence, not fraud evidence.
@ajvanmarle10 ай бұрын
Also known as "can dish it out, but cannot take it"
@boredlawyer3382 Жыл бұрын
The whole scene with the financial records is off. The same records are with the company, and if you know what to look for, they can uncover the whole scheme. They can just subpoena the records from the company, who will be happy to help prove they were being defrauded.
@bgdancer100 Жыл бұрын
Except that they would only know to subpoena the records the company has because of what they know from the records that have been excluded. Fruit of the poisonous tree.
@boredlawyer3382 Жыл бұрын
@@bgdancer100 Not necessarily so. He was already a suspect, they had a valid search warrant for some things, and they found the victim's print in the guy's bathroom. That certainly makes him a suspect. He also works in the financial industry, as did the victim (I think). So it would be perfectly natural under those circumstances to look into the suspect's financial dealings, even if they had not wrongfully seized the records from his house. Pulling the suspect's bank and other financial records is SOP, especially in a case like this, where other motives (like a love triangle or adultery) do not appear present.
@studentofsmith Жыл бұрын
Actually the company might not be so eager to make it public knowledge that they were defrauded. It might damage their reputation.
@vinceedwards3978 Жыл бұрын
I wish you could watch these early seasons of L&O more easily. Peacock only shows seasons 13-20, and season 22!
@Wolffen51 Жыл бұрын
That and it’s not available in Canada
@vinceedwards3978 Жыл бұрын
@@Wolffen51 That is sad. I am a 100% New Yorker, I miss the early stuff!
@thewkovacs316 Жыл бұрын
and finding pirate streams for this show is almost impossible
@bsngrl1 Жыл бұрын
WEtv
@thewkovacs316 Жыл бұрын
@@bsngrl1 we shows all seasons?
@nicholasmaude6906 Жыл бұрын
1:09 - Hey, it's a younger ADA Carver from L&O:CI.
@sdaiwepm Жыл бұрын
Stanford GSB does not award summa, magna, etc.
@Icecube88 Жыл бұрын
it was just showing that he was ambitious/determined/smart/how good he is/whatever
@MichaelKurse Жыл бұрын
He's a liar, and a fraud.
@jbevan4411 Жыл бұрын
Gotta love Courtney B Vance
@twoofthree Жыл бұрын
2:04 Like They Care about Your Diplomas.
@MichaelKurse Жыл бұрын
We don't care.😑😑😑
@frankbonini7085 Жыл бұрын
CBV Would Make a FREAKING Awesome Duke Brother in a (Hypothetical) "Trading Places" Reboot!
@aaronbrigham4743 Жыл бұрын
Well I have resulted in a trillion dollars in trade so you can be quiet since you only went to a billion. 🤣🤣🤣
@wickidblazed420 Жыл бұрын
My mum went to Harvard and graduated
@Joedirt3349 Жыл бұрын
cool story bro
@moonmama2410 ай бұрын
I immediately thought y'all better leave Angela Bassett husband Courtney alone lol
@Blueboy03162 ай бұрын
"Now brush your teeth in a rapid vertical motion! Troop!"
@misterbin00 Жыл бұрын
He's the director of NCIS, so I do think it makes him better than an ordinary detective.
@MrPolicekarim5 ай бұрын
I think that you have gotten him mixed up with Rocky Carroll, who plays Director Leon Vance!
@rachelgarber1423 Жыл бұрын
Courtney B. Vance later hired to work for the DA
@madunwagbo4769 Жыл бұрын
When Logan met Carver
@afihaileywibowo10958 ай бұрын
Logan should've replied to Greer, calmly: Maybe. But I'm not the one accused of doing a bogus job which is why you are sitting on that chair right now so self-righteously defending your bogus trade with your 'degrees' and bonus, Bud. You are what you are, not your degrees. Lenny, do your job.
@Wolffen51 Жыл бұрын
Ok so spoilers requested please…what was the continuation of this episode and what was the final outcome?
@michaelcollins2030 Жыл бұрын
The persons defence was that essentially because of his race as a black man in a all white Wall Street firm he was in over his head and the final outcome was guilty on all charges
@Wolffen51 Жыл бұрын
@@michaelcollins2030 ok thanks
@toastnjam7384 Жыл бұрын
Him and his lawyer played the race card all through the trial and during jury selection his lawyer got him a majority black jury. He arrogantly refused a plea deal for man one and was convicted with second degree murder.
@Idez15 Жыл бұрын
2:36 same 😂
@crucifire9224 Жыл бұрын
I saw smack and a blur looking like will smith in thumbnail
@syedhaider50093 ай бұрын
There should be also videos from Law and order criminal intent also on this channel
@MrBmick798 ай бұрын
a lotta racial undetones in this one. Mike didn't like being talked to like that by a Black man
@sav97987 ай бұрын
at allll lmao
@themermaidstale50083 ай бұрын
Mike wouldn’t have liked it from any man, regardless of color. Mikes not the one being considered a person of interest for a murder and a broker defrauding his employer for undeserved bonuses from bogus accounting practices.
@carloruiz28143 ай бұрын
This episode is based on Joseph Jett, who was a trader for Kidder Peabody.
@joshuaengleman1131 Жыл бұрын
# 262 Palindrome!!!! WHOOOOOOO.... DOGGY!!! 🤘🤘🤘🤘
@Icecube88 Жыл бұрын
so what happened with this case?
@FrankWolenczak Жыл бұрын
"On the sole count of the indictment, Murder in the second degree, how do you find?" "We find the defendant Benjamin Greer, Guilty." Who then looks shocked that the Jury sided against him
@YuvalQ Жыл бұрын
I feel that if this episode aired nowadays, the jury's decision to convict, based on the blatant racism the defendant had to endure, would have seemed somewhat unreasonable by today's terms. Or at the very least, it wouldn't be such a straight and easy conviction and the prosecutor would have much rathered plea him down.
@MuzzyBarker Жыл бұрын
Anger isn't a defense for homicide. People commit crimes of passion all the time. He could have plead to manslaughter by arguing that there was no premeditation, but that would be a tough sell considering he went to the apartment uninvited and had the presence of mine to stage a suicide. Anyway, he said he wasn't interested in any deals. I think the conviction had less to do with the relevance of the racism he faced than it had to do with the burden of an insanity plea. His being offended by his boss didn't negate his ability to know that breaking a man's neck was wrong.
@YuvalQ Жыл бұрын
@@MuzzyBarker If I remember correctly, Hullbruck invited Greer to his apartment to confront and berate him. And while I agree anger isn't a defence for homicide, the case made by the civil rights attorney was strong enough and has shown a consistency of abuse to justify the defendant state of mind at that time. As such, convicting him forthwith would have been challenging.
@MuzzyBarker Жыл бұрын
@@YuvalQ He didn't, though. He cited a couple of incidents, one of which had a major consequence, and neither of which came from the victim. And we didn't get enough of a timeline to establish consistency. The incidents, abusive though they were, justified anger, not insanity. In order for the insanity defense to work, they would have to establish that the abuse took away his ability to know that what he was doing was wrong. The defense not only failed to establish that, but made very little effort in that vain, from what we saw. Considering they had a majority black jury and a barebones defense, it seems more likely they were shooting for nullification.
@RebekahCurielAlessi Жыл бұрын
@@YuvalQthanks for your reasoning....
@RebekahCurielAlessi Жыл бұрын
@@MuzzyBarkerit's enjoyable reading your conversation with the other fellow.
@mew105217 ай бұрын
Why didn't Greer leave the job if his boss was racist?
@MJMonroe Жыл бұрын
christopher darden
@erikafigueroa51289 ай бұрын
Ms Kincaid are you surprised? Come on.
@MichaelKurse Жыл бұрын
Black man in the White Man's World? Why?😑😑😑
@themermaidstale50083 ай бұрын
Money is everyone’s world.
@timwood225 Жыл бұрын
Not real accounting described here. Ok for a story, but not how the world works.
@paulkennedy927 Жыл бұрын
Wasn't that how Arthur Anderson made it work for Enron?
@timwood225 Жыл бұрын
@@paulkennedy927 In the video, the actor describes recording profit when cash received. This is not how most of the world works. What actually happens is that revenue/income is recorded at time of sale whether or not cash changed hands. And that revenue/income is what, for example, taxes are based on (subject to adjustments). If not paid at time of sale, then both revenue and a receivable are recorded, and when that is paid, cash is increased (because received) and the receivable reduced (because paid). And this is called accrual accounting, which is correct for almost all businesses. The alternative is "cash accounting," in which the movement of cash determines when things have happened, which is approximately what is described in the video. And sometimes cash accounting is the right way. In the video the "criminal" is doing accrued accounting the right way, except there never was a sale. Enron did something else. If memory serves, they found a way to list expenses as assets. And that is a complete 100% no-no. Also fraud and a crime. A little like telling your girlfriend's father you're worth $100,000 when really you owe $100,000 on a car you should not have bought.
@shesarunningshesatrackstar78822 ай бұрын
Very handsome see why Angela Bassett married him 😅😅
@dyquancrawford68188 ай бұрын
3:02
@arielg7000 Жыл бұрын
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
@JeremyRobbins-b1n3 ай бұрын
Courtney B. Vance was terrific character in this L&O episode as Bud Greer. He was imo really great as Ron Carver on Criminal Intent.
@89five3five3 ай бұрын
Courtney B. Vance is truly an underrated actor.
@armandgordon Жыл бұрын
Like it
@main___name___main___name Жыл бұрын
The so-called law protects the criminal's right to commit crime.