Рет қаралды 9,456
Here in the Netherlands there is hardly a debate over the principle of vulnerable people wanting to end their own life.
My experience from travelling up and down the country is that the subject, considered somewhat uncouth, virtually taboo in the UK, is one which is discussed openly in the Netherlands. It is a topic which affects many, resulting in personal experiences being frequently shared and often overheard in cafes, restaurants and even on street corners.
That is unsurprising, too. Both euthanasia and assisted suicide deaths were in the low thousands per year when the act came in, yet now they account for over 5% of total deaths nationwide. Last year saw 9,038 people choose to end their suffering in this manner.
The wording of the law has not changed. Doctors work to the idea that someone eligible is enduring “unbearable suffering with no sign of improvement”, and the conversation must be initiated by the patient. There must be two doctors who concur, and the case is automatically referred to the coroner and an independent review committee.
Yet, it is the interpretation of the law, passed back in 2002, which some argue has changed.
The topic of contention is whether physically healthy individuals, including young women in their 20s, should be able to end their lives because of mental health struggles.
Again, this phenomenon has risen exponentially. Back in 2010 there were just two ‘psychiatric’ cases of assisted suicide, compared with last year when 138 people used this justification.
This poses all sorts of challenges for lawmakers and campaigners alike, highlighted by high profile cases in the media.
Milou Verhoof, a physically healthy 17 year old chose to end her own life last year after struggling with borderline personality disorder.
Take Zoraya ter Beek, a 29 year old women who ended her life earlier this year. She opted for physician assisted suicide after a three year wait battling with anxiety, trauma and depression.
On the face of it, of course no one wants to see someone grappling with serious mental health issues opt to take their own life. Instinctively we are uncomfortable with it, and many argue it is evidence of the “slippery slope”.
But that is the essence of the law here: it is the patient's choice. In the case of 29 year old Aurelia Brouwers, she was suffering with depression, anxiety, eating disorders and psychosis. She was killed in a controlled manner clutching her toy pink dinosaur and listening to her favourite music surrounded by friends. Previously she had tried “on at least 20 occasions” to end her life, and was in a “critical condition” on a few of those occasions. The moral argument is tricky and deeply complex.
Indeed, this is not the only debate I have encountered during this trip. Commuters at Utrecht station, rushing to escape the snow, told me about the practice of ‘duo euthanasia’.
This is an increasingly common scenario where two individuals - often couples - choose to end their lives together. The concern here is that one person may be more strident and determined in their wish to terminate their life, at the expense of their spouse who has reluctantly agreed to.
One man warned of a scenario where a healthy individual who is caring for a seriously ill partner becomes sick themselves and concludes that they should both end their existence. The seriously ill partner feels in some way indebted due to the care they have received and agrees without thorough thought, no longer wishing to be a ‘burden’.
Though experts maintain that the strict criteria to qualify for such a death is not compromised in these cases - of which there were 66 in 2023 alone - and it falls to each individual. Similarly, many couples genuinely do not want to live without their soulmate - such as Jan and Els. The couple were married for almost five decades until earlier this year when they made the decision to die. Jan, 70, was suffering serious back pain, whilst Els, 71, had dementia.
The most high profile example of this was Dries van Acht, the Catholic former Dutch Prime Minister who was previously opposed to the law. He and his wife chose earlier this year to die together - they were both 93.
Being an outsider I have to confess I was rather taken aback to learn that 12 years olds are legally eligible for the practice. Naturally there are stricter procedures followed, parental consent required and but there are cases where people of that age are significantly suffering. Understandably and thankfully these cases are rare.
Listen to the full show on Global Player: app.af.globalp...
#henryriley #ukpolitics #LBC
LBC is the home of live debate around news and current affairs in the UK.
Join in the conversation and listen at www.lbc.co.uk/
Sign up to LBC’s weekly newsletter here: l-bc.co/signup