The development of the prototype started in 1989 and the first unit was ready for installation in the following year. The 1.5 MW unit, dubbed "Azipod" (short for azimuthing electric podded drive) was installed on the 1979-built Finnish fairway support vessel Seili at Hietalahti shipyard in Helsinki, Finland.
@kartikdhagai5632Ай бұрын
Excellent. Beyond my intelligence and imagination.
@saminsiddiquee205914 күн бұрын
Nice presentation
@shivendrasingh5899Ай бұрын
Marvellous engineering 🎉
@erikitter67732 ай бұрын
I am quite sceptical about replacing the aircraft carrier instead of accepting losing that capability as having one is not much better than none for several reasons. But having three of these (which means one unit available reliably) makes a lot of sense.
@tightlines1067 ай бұрын
That’s one cool ship would be a pleasure to work on it
@jackwinemiller83587 ай бұрын
its almost an exact copy of a US LHA class amphibious assault ship which has been replaced by the LHD CLASS SHIPS
@ioanbota93979 күн бұрын
Its so powerful I like it
@wings99257 ай бұрын
I notice a lot of footage showing Royal Navy Merlin and Wildcat helicopters. Hopefully this indicates a high level of interoperability between the nations' naval fleets, rather than poorly edited stock foootage inclusion
@GeorgeRuffner-iy7bm8 ай бұрын
Never knew of these. Thanks for the personal update. 🙈🙉🙊 😎 🇺🇸
@nicholaspatton17428 ай бұрын
So many aspects that require a calm seastate. How rough can it it get and still have full utility? Many great attributes as well.
@daveweiss5647Ай бұрын
It's essentially an amphibious assault ship... the US has over a dozen just like it for our Marines... rough seas are always a problem for amphibious operations... but these ships function very well and have for the decades they have been in operation....
@wings99257 ай бұрын
Note to the narrator: Bow as in "cow", not bow as in "mow" Very surprised that an English speaker gets this wrong
@johnarnold893Ай бұрын
That's because it's an AI speaking.
@jwadaow27 күн бұрын
@@johnarnold893 It is not an AI speaking it is a narrator and it is astonishing that there are people who do not know the difference.
@MBB563Ай бұрын
Shes a beast! that ship is more potent than most Navys in the world.
@pedrofmc0000Ай бұрын
Too small. The Spanish one is bigger and heavier
@johnarnold893Ай бұрын
You mean like the Suriname, Guyana or French Guiana maybe. The Ukrainians blew up a bunch of Ruzzian ships with no navy.
@kizzjd95788 ай бұрын
Looks like the aussie hmas canberra and adelaide
@rid1bee7 ай бұрын
More or less. Both are LHDs and both classes can also perform as amphibious assault ships. However, the Canberra class is based on the Spanish Juan Carlos 1. The Canberra class is bigger with a higher tonnage of 27,500 T while the Mistral class has a maximum displacement of 21,500 T.
@drgeoffangel5422Ай бұрын
When will military strategists get it through their heads! A ship is a vulnerable target to aim at! The bigger the ship, the easier the target!
@davidrobertson57006 ай бұрын
Out at sea, a grey container ship floated as nobody could be bothered to make plans other than for a container ship .
@daveweiss5647Ай бұрын
I dont knownwhy they say its one of the only ship in the world like it... tue US Navy has over a dozen amphibious assault ships that do everything it does.... regardless it is an amazing ship, well done France.
@gidsinveenhuizenpuntnl8 ай бұрын
Remember when France wanted to sell ships like these to Russia a couple of years ago? And US vetoed it?
@francinesicard4648 ай бұрын
The problem of the two BPC Class Mistral (amphibious helicopter carriers) ordered by Russia in 2010 for more than a billion euros was resolved when France cancelled the order following the annexation of Crimea and the Donbas war in 2014. But the most ironic thing, or rather hypocrite, is the UK reaction. The then PM, David Cameron and his indignation towards France, but that did not prevent the British authorities from continuing to sell to Russia, precision riffles, ammunition, bulletproof vests, military communications and night vision devices for an amount totalling around 132 million pounds (167 million euros). One rule for the goose, one for.... 😂😂😂
@Rob_F8F7 ай бұрын
The US didn't veto the deal as it is in no position to do so. It was Putin's seizure of Crimea that killed the deal. Putin's timing is, as always, impeccable. 😂😂😂
@gidsinveenhuizenpuntnl7 ай бұрын
@@Rob_F8F technically you are right off course but the US strongly advising with the threat to withhold transfer technological sensitive equipment amounts to the same thing doesn't it?
@Rob_F8F7 ай бұрын
@gidsinveenhuizenpuntnl Unlike every other NATO member, France does not rely on US technology. France has a very strong independent streak. France wants to be a counter weight to the US for European leadership. The US might veto the UK or Poland. The US definitely has no veto over French decision making.
@gidsinveenhuizenpuntnl7 ай бұрын
@@Rob_F8F that is a little naive
@Joakim-j7h9 күн бұрын
I remeber when France agreed the sale of three of these to Russia, that wasnt so long ago.....
@paulvalencia93077 ай бұрын
So where do they store the wine and cheese?
@Bonjour-World7 ай бұрын
In the wine cellar of course.
@guillaume9047Ай бұрын
Ah the french top notch 😊😊
@johnnyb3987Ай бұрын
Nice fishing trawler.
@romeolanuza21206 ай бұрын
Le tonnerie you need Hover Craft Amphibious Assault Marine vehicles
@pedrofmc0000Ай бұрын
Mistral class are too small. Compare them with the Spanish LHD class "Juan Carlos I"...
@janshaw21327 ай бұрын
Very capable but cute and quite medically prepared. Kind of explains the French battle plan.
@MountainMusicRadio22 күн бұрын
Lots of deck space for 6 helicopters
@ArmonMitchell7 ай бұрын
perfection.....usmc needs 12
@morecopemorerope43727 ай бұрын
Funny you say that. The US actually does have 12 of these. But we call them LHA
@ArmonMitchell7 ай бұрын
@@morecopemorerope4372 need to retire the Cobras and replace with Bell 247 Vigilants or make and "enhanced" wing with two added
@rid1bee7 ай бұрын
The US Navy do have those, and they are even much bigger than the French ones.
@jackwinemiller83587 ай бұрын
the us navy had 5 just like it built in the 70's called LHA'S WHICH HAVE ALL BEEN REPLACED BY THE NEWER LHD'S that carry the LCAC hovercraft landing craft
@MakeSomeNoisePlaylistsАй бұрын
@@morecopemorerope4372 LHD is even better, but surely a bit different.....
@BC-tp8epАй бұрын
Australia has 2 of these that are bigger.
@pedrofmc0000Ай бұрын
Spanish design, and based on the LHD class "Juan Carlos I"
@soultraveller502711 күн бұрын
The aussie didnt create anything from scratch through , the spanish ship builders of Juan Carlos class as mentioned lent a big hand in developing their (aussies)version of Juan Carlos amphibious ships
@mistersquirrel08 ай бұрын
It's a big ship, about half the tonnage of LH6 (America Class).
@valerianocuomo9968 ай бұрын
A lot of incompetence or perhaps paid video makes French companies. It is known to all, the top of the top is the Italian TRIESTE: ALSO BOARDS F35B... WITH CAVOUR, TRIESTE, 90 F35, 100 EUROFIGHTER TYPHON, 11 NEW FREMM FRIGATES, 2 DDX AND OTHER 11,000 TON DDX UNDER CONSTRUCTION, 8 SUBMARINE U212, A TRUE PROJECTION FORCE. ITALY HAS FINCANTIERI AND LEONARDO GROUP, THE LARGEST GROUPS IN EUROPE
@billshun39637 ай бұрын
Maybe India should consider purchase one of this top notch Military Vessel on installment just for a legit bragging rights.
@access_denied10823 ай бұрын
Who fucking cares about India???
@20125628 ай бұрын
At least in Egypt, you need two pieces to carry out huge landing operations
@erichpizer12 күн бұрын
i wonder if France will develop VTOL jets like the F35 C
@Shipspotting_Vietnam8 ай бұрын
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm3 ай бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍
@WikiWijaya-ul3cm3 ай бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💪👍
@reymondritonga462514 сағат бұрын
They uniform navy is weird, i thought they are work Labor ship
@TheScottabАй бұрын
Fun fact that they did not mention. The ship can retreat faster than it can advance. Preserving a great French tradition.
@ohaussАй бұрын
Fun fact you didn't mention - you never, ever, did your homework in your life and simply get by with parroting drivel you overheard somewhere.
@RayarBasay6 күн бұрын
💝💞💘❤️🔥💓💗💖
@YepTriedToTellYouАй бұрын
The maginot line of ships.
@SanBrunoBeacon7 ай бұрын
Huge ship, slow target that requires lots of protection from torpedoes and missiles during a "real" war. Does France have enough frigates, cruisers, and destroyers to defend this huge/slow target in a "real" war against China and/or Russia? If not, is this ship going to be limited to heavily defended task force operations with its NATO allies during a "real" war against China and/or Russia?
@Rob_F8F7 ай бұрын
Amphibious ships ALL require escorting warships. This one is no different.
@billshun39637 ай бұрын
Both China and France seems in a pretty good terms. Am I wrong?
@mukkaar6 ай бұрын
Oh wow. You realized something all navies know.
@eljayalcantara36333 ай бұрын
Someone didn't research we'll know facts about these ships and how they operate on a daily basis
@Jakob_DKАй бұрын
You would still need someone to keep proxies at bay. Russian wagner and the like are active in Africa
@freemanlee56557 ай бұрын
even more interesting if that ship carries f35
@squirepraggerstope35917 ай бұрын
The Mistrals are good modestly sized LPH/LPDs, though whether France was justified in building three to help Paris continue playing its fantasy "still a great global power" game instead of maintaining fully France's now hollowed out land forces, is another matter. Either way, we British, whose core national defence really does require a far bigger RN and RAF, should certainly NEVER agree instead to increase our land forces deployments to Europe while France, the defence of which does need 1st and foremost a bigger army, has actually cut back on key land capabilities.
@CashBrooks-e3z11 күн бұрын
Trump's speech about the NATO countries that don't pay there way it can be talked about it is a higher rank to pay your way
@FNO_CCАй бұрын
Its extraordinary ..but useless for battles
@terrytytula15 күн бұрын
Very impressive ship but I guess I've been influenced by the Ukrainian war, all I see is a giant drone target.
@danthemansmailАй бұрын
Missile food.
@robindawtrey9735Ай бұрын
A bit of French Propoganda...size second to Charles DE Gaulle aircraft carrier a few tonnes short...22,000 to CdG 44,000... unparalleled capacity... revolutionary abilities...none of this is new...many navies have similar. But good on them...doesn't hurt to boast a bit.
@Jameslow24868 ай бұрын
The men look different from those walking around Paris 🤔
@swunt108 ай бұрын
You can't run a modern navy with Banlieue monkeys. But I do wonder what they plan to do in future, when the majority of the population has the IQ of the average "newcomer". I guess western europe simply becomes a 3rd world shithole and then having a good navy is the least of your problems.
@TemplarX23 ай бұрын
Only foreigners in Paris not good looking Frenchmen and women.
@daveweiss5647Ай бұрын
LoL... I had a similar thought... these guys are out risking their lives for their country while the politicians are at home just giving it away like it was trash... same across all western countries unfortunately... we are ruled over by despicable traitors...
@lauter352Ай бұрын
Other countries should not be ashamed of buying it, because it is the best in the world, like all the last weapons France built during the last two decades…
@matomasi76Ай бұрын
Less capabilities than Spanish Juan Carlos I
@chrishopewynne2845Ай бұрын
And doing FUCK ALL to stop death on the channel whilst rebuilding Norte Dame …NON …
@马国通靈人10 күн бұрын
Most Advanced IS OUT OF DATE COMPARE TO CHINA
@李志文-y8n7 ай бұрын
MAGA(西元)2024 Mr. Trump Go!Go Go!!Go Go Go!!! Welcome Sir(長官= 先生)To 《美台口味[SeaFood(海鮮)]》in U.S.Taiwan(TGUSA=美台政府)on Sunday(週日)!!Writer:J.L (西元)2024/05/2.
@ybing8 ай бұрын
is this an AI generated voice? publish a video can't pronounce the "Bow" correctly for a ship?
@jackshaftoe1715Ай бұрын
It's a giant target, that should have never been built. Bout as stealthy as an elephant. Other then a jobs program, this was a boondoggle.(Oh ya...the kick backs.)
@RS-xx9veАй бұрын
In fairness the Tonnerre class is unique in the World. According to French traditions, it has one forward gear and SIX reverse! 😂😂 #naz1collaborators
@grahamfordham64758 ай бұрын
With this equipment a yet they canot stop migrants leving there shours.
@fcassmann2 ай бұрын
You are weird. 🇪🇺🇳🇱
@daveweiss5647Ай бұрын
@fcassmann no... he is correct, all this money for defense but all our nations are being invaded by millions from across the world finally facilitated by the politicians and bureaucrats in charge... it is despicable.
@raywhitehead730Ай бұрын
Actually, useless.
@jackwinemiller83587 ай бұрын
its almost a carbon copy of the united states navy's LHA class ships built in the late 70's and since been replaced by the LHD class amphibious assault ships which handle the LCAC hovercrafts. so id say the french navy needs to look up "state of the art" cuz that ship aint even close. sorry french guys, good try though. btw, where would you ever actually perform an amphibious landing? upon who? lmao
@daveweiss5647Ай бұрын
The French conduct tons of foreign operations, especially in Africa... look up "FranceAfique" they essentially still control their former colonial Empire there and conduct constant operations there...
@momcilopucar87497 ай бұрын
Let me give you people lesson of reality. Read this comment to educate yourself, then you'll see reality.....Today most powerful ships are those ships armed with long ranges unstoppable hypersonic missiles like Kinzhal, Zircon, Zmeyevik and kh-95. ONLY Russian Airforce, NAVIES and Submarines are armed with those unmatched Hypersonic missiles. Those missiles mentioned had RENDERED whole Western Airforce and NAVIES OBSOLETE. Not to mention Russian ICBM's Mach 27 unstoppable unmatched hypersonic missiles and ranges. Rest are Mack 8-20 Russia the invincible.🇷🇺👌👍👏
@sebbosebbo9794Ай бұрын
3 days.... we know.... we know.
@daveweiss5647Ай бұрын
These ships are not made to invade Russia... they are to project power in Africa, the middle east amd Asia/Pacific... why would anyone ever conduct an amphibious operation against Russia? Or any other Nuclear power for that matter???
@aitortilla5128Ай бұрын
Russia the invincible thought it could conquer Ukraine in 3 days and a few years later...it's still stuck in the east