Part 2 critiques mainstream interpretations of polynomial long division and explores the concept of zero and factors in algebra. Key points include: Misinterpretation of Zero in Division: Mainstream mathematics often assumes (x-3)/(x-3)=0 in expressions like (x^3+x^2-8x-12) /(x-3) , yet algebra treats (x-3) as non-zero to proceed with division, leading to inconsistencies. Factors and Division: Factors emerge from division, where one magnitude exactly measures another. For example, 5 ÷ 3 shows that 3 is not a factor of 5 but requires 3 and/or equal parts of 3, for full measurement. Critique of Extending Factor Concept: Applying the concept of factors to "real numbers" like 𝜋 introduces contradictions, as numbers like 𝜋 cannot be measured exactly by 1. Connection to KATIS: Proper understanding of division ensures consistent knowledge acquisition through KATIS, avoiding flawed foundational concepts. This section underscores the importance of precise definitions and logical consistency in mathematical theory. Join here to get access to Members Only Channel: kzbin.info/door/lBbBVLs3M-d3dNgU4Vop_Ajoin
@NewCalculus17 күн бұрын
The "equal sharing" method is proof that the idiots of mainstream mathematics academia have never understood the concept of division, but more importantly, the baboons have never understood measure. The Ancient Greeks (brilliant beyond belief) defined this all-important distinction between the two. Although they understood it clearly, they were not able to articulate or write it down in the way that I have enlightened you: Geometric measure: Uses random physical unit AND/OR parts of physical unit. Quality of Measure: Perfection, since geometric arithmetic is 100% precise. Algebraic measure: Uses an abstract unit AND/OR equal parts of the abstract unit. Quality of Measure: Precarious, as algebra sacrifices precision for generality. Precision is precise only if numbers are used.