1650HP Mercury Racing Crate Motor with Jason from Mercury

[@hpa101]

We got that feeling too Riley. Jason is a real solid wealth of knowledge.

[@khabaaustralia]

That engine has such a awesome sound

[@RileyCarson]

Gorgeous car! It was interesting to watch, I could tell that Jason has a heap of knowledge in his head.

[@Icecream_Unicorns]

Awesome, was reading the Street Rodder magazine Vol 47 no.12 and read the article 750HP DOHC LS7 and ended up here 😉🖒🖒 so cool

[@stevedriver1476]

Mercury built the Twin Cam Corvette 350ci SBC from the C4 ,, there cheap at around $30k

[@garyhurn]

Wow amazing bit of engineering

[@hpa101]

It sure is! I'd love to have a street car with this engine. :)

[@jlo13800]

Yeah dry sump with oil injection for this poppet valved 2 stroke which I heard this is, a few gallons of amsoil dominator 2 stroke will make her happy. I want to find one as aluminum block is easy to cut ports into it

[@ramaldoross7726]

9 liter engine must have tremendous piston speed are there simulated pounding in the test tank? The impact a engine takes off big waves could do alot of damage to piston/block.

[@finlay230]

once again, another awsome vid !!!

[@hpa101]

Thanks ***** Jason is a straight up bad arse. We can't get enough of this car.

[@justingriffith2991]

@@hpa101 how. Do got one

[@bernardwarr4187]

Fabulous build. Could you tell me where the fuel cells where relocated too?

[@Mrjohnnymoo1]

"Conservative" 1600hp.

[@AlexGarcia-ew2fv]

I can tell Mercury doesn't wanna say Shit about this motor...all he is doing is giving the Reporter...the run around..

[@sabrinak.8269]

I wonder if we could see 1650 on an E-85 tune with this awesome beast? Do you know if Jason and his team do that kind of tune with this?

[@AB-80X]

Problem is not whether or not it could, because it can. What will be the limiting factor is the injectors. If the injectors will supply the fuel, it's most likely 2500+ capable on E85. It would most likely be 2500-3000 hp capable in a car application on C16. It's a marine engine and it's already quite reliable in a 1650 hp C16 application. it can make a hell of a lot more power in a car where it's not under a constant high load with a high cylinder pressures.

[@98integraGSR]

E85 is a very poor marine fuel because it's so hydroscopic.

[@jlo13800]

I would run oil injection from dry sump and VRO pump with silkooene pro 2 sx 2 stroke oil. This has roller bearings every where and is a poppet valved loop charger 2 stroke

[@chrisdeez2176]

@@jlo13800 WTF are you talking about, your not even in the same universe as this engine

[@jlo13800]

@@chrisdeez2176 do you run oil i njection and can it run in multiple positions

[@mraperish]

wow. that thing would be a handful!

[@jlo13800]

Dry sump with oil injection VRO pump into the intake poppet valved looper 2 stroke. I would do this if I could find one cheap

[@ChutneyInc.]

I'm going to spend 20 thousand on one of these before I die. promise

[@robbiehobbs2009]

Try $175,000.00 EACH

[@davidvalentine8682]

2 for 40 thousand

[@jlo13800]

2 stroke conversion with dry sump oil injection like this::m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/f4PMeKRji76Ki80

[@reminoel483]

More like 70,000$ each for bare engines. Now twin engines for a boat with all the running gear will cost you over 220,000. That without the drive components and without the boat itself. Your looking at a million dollar setup.

[@stuart38]

For the engine,or the whole car?

[@kurtdobson]

What kind of transaxle is being used? I'm not aware of anything available that will handle more than 650 lb/ft of torque. Looks cool, but I don't think the transaxle or axles will take the torque. There's a reason F1 engines turn at 24,000 rpm. It's to develop a lot of HP at much lower torque such that the transaxle can be physically much smaller.

[@JimmyCasket02]

2500hp without even trying, damn

[@77trashman]

Any relation to mercury marine????

[@johnmarshall4442]

Yes , it's Mercury marine

[@TIMEtoRIDE900]

I'm thinking a tubbed Vega, plex windows, 2 bottles of NOSS, and a 'chute.

[@coin666911]

TIMEtoRIDE900 I want same thing but a corvair wagon and mid engine

[@jlo13800]

Oil injection and amsoil dominator is what I will run if I get one of these, it’s a big valved 2 stroke

[@ThabaniTBowseHadebe0909]

9litre !! Geeez!! Andre you look so young pal hahah ;)

[@hpa101]

Amazing what a lack of shaving does these days eh haha - Taz.

[@shingnosis]

It should perhaps be mentioned that in a powerboat application these engines can easily consume +100 gallons/h when going for it. Just build your gas tank large enough is what I'm saying.

[@bradchristy8429]

And there’s never just one of these engines in a boat. Ever.

[@MovieMuscle]

Your car rolls on a smooth surface, a boat pushes a very large and heavy object through water. The two loads are vastly different. Ever try to run in the water vs on land? Hence why boats consume far more fuel. It would consume far less in a car than in a boat. Also in a car we have multi speed transmissions, a boat does not. A car cruises in top gear with low rpm, a boat runs 3/4 throttle for it's regular cruising. On a highway we use almost no throttle to maintain a cruise speed. That being said a 1650 hp 9 liter motor will not sip fuel. Check out a Hellcat, at top speed it smokes it's fuel supply in minutes with just wind restriction and minor friction as it's load.

[@andykerr3803]

@@MovieMuscle Top fuel dragster all burn over a gallon per second. And that is minimum 90% nitromethane. A typical offshore boat burns through 3000 dollars in a short outing. Both are for super rich or corporate racing. A lot of guys park their boats at the beach mostly...

[@dr.hugog.hackenbush9443]

A fuel dragster will go through 17 gallons in 1000 feet. But its also making 10,000+hp.

[@stewart8127]

I want it for drift tractor semi high octane rolling coal

[@weatheranddarkness]

This sucked. It looked like he didn't respect you enough to actually engage on a technical level. Your interviews with every other engine builder have been much more candid and enlightening.

[@TheTektronik]

Is it based on the SB4 7.0?

[@IssaBendeck1]

wowwww you guy are too much that car most have the besttt power to weight ratio of a car everrr 2650 lbs/1650 that i make my numbers uuu are talking 1,5lbs per hp im gonna buy a untima car but i dont really care to go that loco those cares are allreaDY SUPER FAST THE 720 HP 2150 LBS IS A 3LBS PER HP ALL READY ONE OF THE FASTEST HARD TO BEAT SUPER CAR IN THE WORLD i wonder if it will ever hook up any ways good look to you guys with that great job

[@volvo245]

Yeah i like to see the setup where it does full open throttle on 4 wheels for more than 5 minutes...You would need to tow a fuel tank behind that Ultima and put 3 times the radiators on it so it won't melt. 😂

[@siraff4461]

Where is the place on earth a 1 tonne Ultima can be pinned at 1650hp for 5 minutes straight? There are very few places where more than 30s or so of WOT would be realistic and almost nowhere for much over a minute.

[@MrBundyjr]

@@siraff4461 its called a rolling dyno fool

[@siraff4461]

@@MrBundyjr What has that got to do with it? The point is you can't pin it for that long so there's no point designing it to do that. It's not like driving your moms fiesta.

[@JimmyCasket02]

j r a dyno also couldn’t replicate the airflow of the car actually moving so it would over heat real quick

[@reclinerrecords9075]

9 Liter and1600HP? YIKES!!

[@Themayseffect]

pretty horrible.

[@jlo13800]

This is some time of big block 2 stroke, it’s got dry sump so it can be rigged with oil injection, Klotz oil is what I would use, I want to get one of these engines for s 2 stroke conversion but they are not cheap

[@jlo13800]

An 850 rotax makes over 3 hp per CID with a turbo, this bid poppet valved 2 stroke comes close though

[@Edgar-Friendly]

The gas mileage would be terrible, but this engine could move a bus!

[@mr19zee]

I'm sure it can move a train

[@rapidfiremuzik_official]

thumbs UP for the looneyz! haha

[@Mike383HK]

The tech today that makes an engine last longer is a centrifugal blower. You can still get lots of power but it spools a little slower and it's easier on parts. Perfect for boats. No heat like a turbo. Better for cars.

[@98integraGSR]

You have no clue what you're talking about... Centri units don't "spool", much less "spool slower". They're actually HARDER on parts than a turbo, since they usually add a lot of lateral load to the crank snout, and finally, THEY STILL MAKE AN ASS-TON OF HEAT, BECAUSE COMPRESSING AIR ALSO HEATS IT, which is why pretty much every Procharger kit still comes with an intercooler. Also, what the fuck does any of what you said even remotely have to do with this video?

[@WattsUpDev]

Mike383HK Did you just say “a supercharger spools slower than a turbo” 😭😭😭😂😂😂😂😂

[@jlo13800]

Oil injection from dry sump, it’s a roller bearings poppet valved loop charged 2 stroke.

[@johnanthony8874]

Will it take glock mags

[@AB-80X]

This thing does not run 200-300 hours in a marine application without rebuilds. The 1100 maybe, but not the race spec 1650.

[@buck19]

That's just race gas on the street cam. 1650hp is just a baseline. that engine is most likely capable of 2500hp in marine trim. remember, they're only at 20psi.

[@AB-80X]

What? 1650 is not a baseline, it's the max power offered on this engine on race gas. And no, if the engine is capable of 1650 hp in a car, it is not capable of 2500 hp in a boat. When this engine was developed a few years ago, Mercury Racing raced a version dubbed Quadzilla with four turbos that had an output of 1750 hp and those things needed rebuilds after each race. Boat engines are under a lot more strain, run wot for much longer periods with higher cylinder pressure than car engines. There's a reason why see so few offshore engines above 1500 hp and the 2000hp car engines are all over the place. I've built both, and it takes a lot more to build a strong 1000 hp boat engine than a strong 1000 hp car engine. That's also why boat engines have a much shorter cycle between rebuilds. This exact engine has an output of 1350 hp in marine applications on 91 AKI fuel, 1650 is not a baseline in any way shape or form, it is what the engine is capable of.

[@buck19]

+ABOlsen69X I'm seein 2.4litres churn out 750whp ethanol and boosted down for regular street use. your telling me a 9 litre with unlimited funds cant achieve a better hp/ltr when it doesn't go thru the gear shock a street strip car gets. not to mention your IATs, EGTs, and oil temp are better in a marine application, consisting it's getting cooling from the body of water it floats in, meaning more oxygen for more fuel and less heat related stress. overheating at extended WOT should not be an issue, where as the street applications would see temps an easy 100° higher. ???

[@buck19]

+ABOlsen69X and I say the 1650 is a baseline cause that was at 20 psi pump gas...

[@AB-80X]

Don't take this in an offensive way, but I think you need a basic understanding of what an offshore marine engine is, what it can and can't do to understand this and you don't have that. The way you describe things and compare them, has nothing to do with anything. In order to understand a high performance marine engine like the Merc 1650, you need to forget everything about car engines. There's a reason why a built 1400 hp whipple blown EFI marine engine is more expensive than a 2500 hp twin turbo EFI street engine. Everything needs to be overbuilt to an extreme degree, and yes, running WOT for long periods with high cylinder pressures is very tough on the engines. The ocean may provide a lot of water, but there are a limit to how much water you can flow through the cooling system without doing damage, so it's really a moot point. As for the 1650 having to run 112 AKI or higher,? Don't believe me? Why don't you ask Mercury racing or just have a look on their website? It's all there. If you really want to know about this stuff, I suggest that you become a member of the offshroeonly.com forum. Lots of nice people there, including many who run the Merc TT 1100's, 1350's and 1650's. There are great engine builders like Eddie Young, Bob Madera, Dustin Whipple and Tyson Garvin who are always up for answering questions. Have a good day.

[@fixitup686]

F1 engine for 2021

[@Themayseffect]

Seems like a situation of "we did it because we can". Dumbest build ever on a practical standpoint. Engine is way too fucking large for a track car.

[@mr19zee]

Can it fit in a 93 Mazda Miata? Lol JK

[@hpa101]

Do it. I dare you =P - Taz.

[@jlo13800]

The rotary 2 stroke wankle and sled motors run better oil injection than this thing. this big block valved 552 CID 2 stroke needs a turbo to barely make under 3 hp pet CID, A rotax 850 etec make over 3hp per CID without turbo

[@Gs112780]

Pump gas 1350 Hahahah

[@randallamps]

Its the British Invasion.

[@TheBraine44]

Hennessy is way out of your league. Stay on your boat monopoly.

[@98integraGSR]

John Hennessey is a dumbass and a CROOK. He's a JOKE in the performance world that overcharges for shoddily engineered bullshit and routinely rips off his customers.

[@jlo13800]

Finally a big block 2 stroke valved, loop charged though with oil injection, roller bearings throughout the motor, impressive big 2 stroke hear

[@1994F150L]

Wow 6 feet wide 4 feet tall probably over a ton zero parts availability so whatever

[@ChutneyInc.]

JethroBodean I read they have everything need to make it happen with money. I'm sure they will keep your investment running if you give them over 10g's. I would m8

[@greatmess32]

Funny considering its LS based you fuckwit

[@WattsUpDev]

Robert Anderson The small block is LS based not the 9 Liter

[@WattsUpDev]

JethroBodean They do have parts availability, in-fact they have multiple factories.

[@jlo13800]

It’s a big block valved 2 stroke