I prefer the terminology 'lowest common multiple' because "least common" can be misinterpreted as something entirely unrelated to the question at hand. With "lowest," you know that you're just looking for the smallest multiple that is found between all numbers in a given question.
@girirajvardhan2722 Жыл бұрын
Can you explain with context?
@Catimixto7 ай бұрын
It's even worse in spanish, "Mínimo común multiplo"
@travelvids93865 ай бұрын
@girirajvardhan2722 least common can also mean rare.
@fatimeh03 ай бұрын
hah @@obsyrd_freg
@indrahx59052 ай бұрын
I came here to find out what "least common multiple" meant - because it isn't self explanatory. "Lowest common" makes way more sense and it's how we describe it in German as well (kleinstes gemeinsames Vielfaches).
@davemaciver36818 ай бұрын
I'm planning to go back to uni in the next couple of years to study nursing which needs higher maths for some reason and I zoned out by that stage as I was already going to college for acting. I was GREAT at maths when I was in school, went to master classes and everything, but haven't bothered with it for 2 and a half decades. We're getting to the point of the course where I'm feeling proud of myself for getting stuff right! Thanks other Dave :)
@albabahmed27354 жыл бұрын
You are a blessing to us who forgot how to do basic math :D
@suzi83643 жыл бұрын
Me :3
@user-ri7qy1en7l3 жыл бұрын
@@suzi8364 I forgot the multiplication table and now here I am starting from the very first
@etherealbladerx81534 жыл бұрын
You're "Checking Comprehension" music is as if the one who composed Earthbound music tried his hand at making the Wii shop channel music 😂 just a little funny to me 😊 great stuff as always
@jayw87264 жыл бұрын
I took me 20years to properly understand this since this was first explained in Grade 4 back in year 2000! Reckon my teacher was really lacking in her pedagogy! 😂
@aliaoda88642 жыл бұрын
Same
@vdvoskin1 Жыл бұрын
there is an easier way to find the lest common multiple. lets take 18 and 24. start dividing both members by any common number that will yield a whole number, so first division is by 2: 18/2=9 and 24/2=12, remaining numbers can be further divided so we continue, second division is by 3: 9/3=3 12/3=4, we cannot divide anymore so we simply multiply the remaining numbers by the numbers we used to divide: 3*4*2*3=72.
@sandpaper6095 Жыл бұрын
Genius
@vaibhavgore165 Жыл бұрын
🙌
@rizzwan-4206910 ай бұрын
lemme try 12 and 80 divide by 4: 3 and 20. 20×3×4=12×20 clearly 240 this works and it's faster.
@maithrisiri9 ай бұрын
Thanks
@emcmnd41963 жыл бұрын
I figured out a incredibly fast way to find the least common multiple of two numbers. That is to find the ratio between the numbers and then simlify it into the simplest fraction form. Finally, multiple the small number of the two number with the big number of the fraction or the oppsite. The result is the least common multiple of the two numbers
@NickHope3 жыл бұрын
By that method you can either multiply the numerator (the top number) of the simplified fraction by the denominator (the bottom number) of the original fraction, or vice versa with the same result.
@zaini97153 ай бұрын
And how exactly would you find the simplest fraction? From a whole number??
@ignacioleikis17844 жыл бұрын
So the way to calculate the LCM of two numbers is to take the greatest number of factors of one number with the greatest number of factors from the other, irregardless of whether one factor repeats from one number to the other?
@aashsyed12773 жыл бұрын
yep. it's not told in other countries but it is told in india& pakistan
@4karma860 Жыл бұрын
10% done with the playlist :3
@Carrymejane11 ай бұрын
HAHAHAHAHAHSAHAW
@potat0wn3d6 ай бұрын
16.5
@asifshawon4511Ай бұрын
😂😂
@tres-2buniverse72911 ай бұрын
I think there is a simpler way to find the least common multiple by finding the biggest number which can divide both of the members,6 in this case 18/6=3 24/6=4 since 6 is common multiple for both numbers, then we multiply it with the result of the smallest numbers 3.4.6=72 (I dont know what Im doing though I suck at math so dont take this comment seriously)
@tres-2buniverse72911 ай бұрын
20/4=5 28/4=7 5.7.4=140 it worked for the second one too I think this works
@tres-2buniverse72911 ай бұрын
14/2=7 36/2=18 18.7.2=252 still works
@tres-2buniverse72911 ай бұрын
50/5=10 65/5=13 13.10.5=650 and this is the last still works too,I find it easier to multiply relatively bigger numbers compared to simplifying a big number
@timurnachname16817 жыл бұрын
What do you Think about the euclid Algorithm for LCM and HCF?
@surjeetkumarsingh82516 жыл бұрын
Timur nachname 2
@yatu90022 жыл бұрын
4:17 wait how is 4/12 bigger than 3/12 because when you divide you get 3 > 4 how it should be 4 > 3 or it is about how many times does the number fit into if the number fit's into it
@shubhampal5328 Жыл бұрын
Dividing 4 into 12 parts will always be greater than diving 3 into 12 parts.
@lutherjeremy6150 Жыл бұрын
hello, let me help yatu, imagine it's a circle piece of 4/12 and 3/12, if you simplify the 4/12 and 3/12, you get 1/3 and 1/4. Well, 1/3 circle is bigger than 1/4 circle right ? hope it helps🙏🏾
@sultanmo96312 жыл бұрын
Not me, a senior engineering student learning about LCM here :)
@torosalvajebcn6 жыл бұрын
Another way to know which fraction is bigger is by cross multiplication
@IzeDesu10 ай бұрын
yes its easier but in some equations its more relevant to use LCM
@AbhishekDwivedi-zx5nv Жыл бұрын
Thank you Professor .
@Zone_Ranger7 жыл бұрын
I like to use LCM(a,b)=a*b/GCD(a,b)
@mayankarora53772 жыл бұрын
what if the GCD of both numbers is 1 ? then this formula will imply LCM^2 which is obviously incorrect
@Zone_Ranger2 жыл бұрын
@@mayankarora5377 then the lcm(a,b)=a*b
@anthonystark62152 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Professor!
@Warlocktopus7 жыл бұрын
i thought LCM stood for lowest common multiple. I learned something ^^
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
lowest = least, same thing!
@topiado20734 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains 😄
@ljr6490 Жыл бұрын
Isn't this kinda similar to an OR operator with the joining the most abundant primes?
@sampannoi2 ай бұрын
at first i thought he was a scary math techer but now i think i have to teach math to my school math scary teacher
@lifewithtine23974 күн бұрын
Aight Xmas break to learn math 🔥
@Metal_Icarus3 ай бұрын
Thanks for making this video!
@ShohsanamShonazarova2 ай бұрын
Thank you, Professor.
@lisaleidy3442 жыл бұрын
So helpful, thank you.
@MemoUlloahАй бұрын
Best channel ever!!
@MiltosPol-qn3zh7 жыл бұрын
Very good
@jonnyabatti51204 жыл бұрын
In the comprehension 18 24, i factored 24 -> 12*2 and then 12 -> 4*3 and then 4 -> 2*2. Why am I wrong? Hope you can help me
@asifbaig38114 жыл бұрын
in order to find LCM we have to divide by lowest number because we have the lowest number 24/12= 2 and 18/9 = 2 so we won't be able to find least number. To find you have to 2 (24,18) 2(12,9) 2(6,3) 2(2,3) 3(1,3) (1,1) 2*2*2*2*3
@asifbaig38114 жыл бұрын
Please ignore the explanation is wring
@zemo74832 жыл бұрын
You have to write only primes as it factors. They are 24= 2*2*2*3 18=2*3*3 Now the 2 appears three times in 24's factors and, 3 appears twice in 18's factors so , LCM= 2*2*2*3*3 = 72
@Lewis_8 Жыл бұрын
@@zemo7483 72 you mean...
@zemo7483 Жыл бұрын
@@Lewis_8 yes
@user-xf6zw5jy5v4 жыл бұрын
This helped allot
@riiachka5 жыл бұрын
prof dave, i think that in the checking comprehendsion the answer for 18 and 20 is wrong. shouldnt it be 180?
@ProfessorDaveExplains5 жыл бұрын
that's not one of the questions
@riiachka5 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains oh sorry i meant 24, not 20
@jonnyabatti51204 жыл бұрын
Joey Koch what i dont get is 24 if i factor it 12*2 and go from there i get the wrong answer. So when doing this what do i havw to keep in mind
@jonnyabatti51204 жыл бұрын
In the comprehension 18 24, i factored 24 -> 12*2 and then 12 -> 4*3 and then 4 -> 2*2. Why am I wrong?
@0Coeus3 жыл бұрын
@@jonnyabatti5120 Nothing in your comment is wrong, you are just not done with all the steps. The prime factorisation of 24 is 2*2*2*3 (this is what you did) The prime factorisation of 18 is 2*3*3 To find the least common multiple you take the multiples of each whole number from the factorisation that has the most. 24 has three of the number 2, while 18 only has one, so we take the three. 18 has two of the 3's, while 24 only has one, so we take the two: 2*2*2*3*3 = 72 The video does not explain why this works, so I guess thats a story for another time :)
@Brindleee11 ай бұрын
Also this is soo helpful ❤
@sphephilezwane5539 Жыл бұрын
You the best😭😭❤️❤️
@yeayeah83214 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@tulsidevi67684 жыл бұрын
Why unlikes for this video,🤔🤷
@chourouk-gr9qg5 ай бұрын
Thnx man
@TaeKinzel Жыл бұрын
I heard one fast food place made a 1/3 burger but people thought it was smaller so it didn't work out.
@user-vh4jn4vv8e7 жыл бұрын
Nice
@OwlbaTr0ss8 ай бұрын
why does this work tho? I understad the process but I do not understand why it works, is it just one of those stupid "that's just the way it is in math things that just works and we don't know why"?
@salah1x3 жыл бұрын
I understand it pretty well now, but I still don't find any useful application for it. I can find which fraction is greater simply by converting it to decimals instead of doing all of this
@asdfcsa41fas3 жыл бұрын
works for small fractions. but it is highly unlikely that you are going to convert something like 57/960 into decimal. easier to find the lcm between 960 and whatever other number you are comparing it to.
@sanjayx53942 жыл бұрын
Lcm
@hewathekoalafan72363 жыл бұрын
Hi there can we get more
@ProfessorDaveExplains3 жыл бұрын
Check my mathematics playlist, it has everything you need.
@Brindleee11 ай бұрын
Haha I love ur theme song
@Sec0ndSqu4re10 ай бұрын
GCD FOR GREATEST COMMON DENOMINATOR NOT LCM FRO LEAST COMMON MULTIPLE but at least its good
@yodazo96582 ай бұрын
wow, I'm good at math
@mamadwali42785 ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@tysongordon46234 жыл бұрын
who else is watching this for school this is how many people are l l v
@rdw37215 ай бұрын
Me😂😂
@therandomisedo7175 Жыл бұрын
6*9 huh 😂
@MamathaPonugoti6 ай бұрын
I not anshould last 4 questions
@timppaUT10 ай бұрын
No it doesn't!? :P You can't multiply infinity by three!? :D