Thank you so much to Prof Jon Stewart and the University of Copenhagen! Really appreciate having access to this free quality content.
@douglasmcdermid30926 жыл бұрын
Ditto
@LordLoss4 жыл бұрын
Amazing quality
@jorgesanchez2503 жыл бұрын
Was Socrates real? I am afraid he is a character like the Arlequino.
@sharonbre93472 жыл бұрын
I was raised on Cartesian solipsism and later worked in the analytic tradition. I studied Kierkegaard in graduate school to ask questions that the analytical approach could not even entertain. I relate to the inwardness and the role of the self in the organization of experience.
@NS-wo6ze5 жыл бұрын
Simple to follow and meaningful delivery, as philosophy should be for philosophers and non philosophers alike. Great lecture, sir ! (Oxford).
@velintangardzhiev95817 жыл бұрын
Thank You very much for your work mr. Steward!
@andrewmceneff20105 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture! Many thanks from Ireland.
@ScottLordnovelist5 жыл бұрын
Thank you again. Just checking back during another course on Existentialism.
@TheBirdBrothers4 жыл бұрын
Great content, thank you for sharing this.
@sdustin79862 жыл бұрын
I took this course. Very well done. Recommended.
@katarzynaklimek31915 жыл бұрын
Very understandable for non-philosophers :-) Awesome! 👍
@chrissidiras3 жыл бұрын
Dear sound engineers please deliver some lessons on sound engineering to our beloved friends philosophers. Thank you!
@MediocreApologist4 жыл бұрын
highly recommend .
@briankelly58286 жыл бұрын
A very clear and helpful introduction -thank you.
@namagome558 жыл бұрын
good stuff!
@thenewjerusalem48078 жыл бұрын
excellent
@abooswalehmosafeer1735 жыл бұрын
THANKS.
@jackreacher.3 ай бұрын
I participate wholeheartedly in educational lectures. The multidimensional coincidental unification of self-conscious acceptance of a juxtaposition furthering the comprehension of logos extending from mythos inspires my breathing to cease and the beating of my heart to pause. I am Socrates while I, Euthyphro, anticipating each of our utterances while emitting the intention of our cognition. I run from me to escape the aggression of my interrogation. I am guilty of my accusation. Who is this Kierkegaard?
@StreetsOfVancouverChannel8 жыл бұрын
Very helpful :)
@likira1116 жыл бұрын
"he didnt have many friends which was probably due to the fact he had a tendency to tease and antagonise his fellow students with his superior intellect , he enjoyed soundly refuting their arguemnets making them look silly, unfortuanlyy since he wasnt the largest boy in his class his provocations had the consequence of him getting beat" idol
@JerryLiuYT6 жыл бұрын
I remember a guy like that in school. He never got beat, but he was always ostracized.
@space-time-somdeep5 ай бұрын
Wow ❤❤
@RocketKirchner4 жыл бұрын
'' the concept of dread is the possibility of freedom ''Kierkegaard . SK understood the burden of free will and need to make the leap of faith into the harsh landscape of becoming a true christian practionier
@chingunanderson82293 жыл бұрын
Interesting. Although he is American, he speaks English as if he was a Danish person. His words are sharp and short.
@Mstr8893 жыл бұрын
Assimilation
@stephenhall11 Жыл бұрын
You don't hear nearly as much as you would expect about Kierkegaard. In a way he is a half forgotten thinker. For a long time I have been searching for someone that could say something meaningful about Kierkegaard's idea of the Individual. I am hopeful and will be paying close attention.
@grantsmythe86259 ай бұрын
I studied S.K., in my youth and now in my old age I'm returning to him. He is a profound exponent of Christianity.
@caderichardstv58028 ай бұрын
fr nobody gonna talk about the audio?
@lynnfisher3037Ай бұрын
No. Stop complaining about it. Be grateful( familiar with that concept?) that many people were involved in putting this together so that we could LEARN something important without charging for their scholarship. For shame(if you even understand THAT concept).😢
@kittylor95316 жыл бұрын
great lecture
@patricks15605 жыл бұрын
I'm still stuck on "Fear and Trembling". My first Kierkgaard book. Ooee - isn't that deep. I'm tempted to take shortcuts but I've learnt from experience that going to the source is the only sure way to get value. Second hand opinions are just that - second hand.
@KirurUwU5 жыл бұрын
It seems to me that it is best to read Kierkegaard chronologically, but then all the way through to avoid misconceptions. Fear and Trembling is a rather later work.
@patricks15605 жыл бұрын
Maybe, but I just grab what I can. When I accidentally come upon a book that has some value, I suck it dry. I'm a working class guy, nobody structured my reading, but after reading a certain amount of crap one develops a sense for what is good..
@RocketKirchner4 жыл бұрын
@@patricks1560 the most important part of Fear and Trembling is the chapter of ''The teleological suspension of the ethical ''. thus Abraham transcends the universal ethical man Socrates by being willing to obey God and offer up his own son which represents Abes future . thus Abe is without a past or future apprehends the eternal now .
@zachd46933 жыл бұрын
@@KirurUwU Fear and Trembling is a very early work of Kierkegaard's, being published in 1843-the same year as Either/Or which established his first authorship.
@KenLongTortoise2 жыл бұрын
@@RocketKirchner Socrates > Abe precisely because Abe made a bad choice
@muminmannen4 жыл бұрын
Open Culture brought me here
@richardzellers3 жыл бұрын
Is the explanation of irony here really just sarcasm?
@rockycomet45872 жыл бұрын
That's what I was thinking.
@KenLongTortoise2 жыл бұрын
No, it is the actual definition of irony
@christan43122 жыл бұрын
Call Jesus blood
@Wingedmagician4 жыл бұрын
The way you say Kierkegaard is giving me anxiety.
@JerryLiuYT6 жыл бұрын
Bad audio :)
@likira1116 жыл бұрын
was Socrates then even that smart or just sassy and driven by values? everyone likes to take things to a higher level but how wasnt he just some annoying person everyone got annoyed by? wasnt he just as much a bag of hot air as the others but won the arguemnts and then wasnt seen as such.
@Laou416 жыл бұрын
well, they killed him for a reason.
@bingbingbong28866 жыл бұрын
+Matthew Zunder, LOL
@ryancain60124 жыл бұрын
That is an opinion entertained by the scholarship. But even if this were the case, history has found Socrates noble because he seemed to have a commitment to a higher purpose than his peers. It is wisdom to pursue truth to one's ability rather than take advantage of others who, perhaps, have lesser ability than oneself. Whether this was in fact the case or not, the Socratic figure (which SK respected) seems to be worthy of the merit ascribed to it.
@JP-rf8rr3 жыл бұрын
That's oddly enough what his opposition saw him as. The problem is that most of his talks is just him asking questions. What is justice, what's good for the soul, how we know things. In most of his dialogues he doesn't argue for any particular case or make many positive claims. He admits that he is annoying in the apology but he says that's a good thing. He claims to be the gadfly that makes the horse move. He pushes people to talk about the important things of life and to know oneself so that we may be happy in the ancient sense. To get a better idea what that kind of happiness is I recommend this lecture going over that question specifically. kzbin.info/www/bejne/epy2i2t6iNatrdU