This lecture covers the methodology of claim construction, focusing in particular on the Phillips case.
Пікірлер: 6
@alexandermiller658310 ай бұрын
I love that near the end of each of these lectures, the professor turns into a demonic creature speaking the tongue of satan and then returns to human language. Comic relief 😂
@akshatgautam8 жыл бұрын
This is a stellar critique of wishy-washy judicial opinion writing.
@Zakariah19713 жыл бұрын
Clear as mud, thanks professor.
@peterkou33297 жыл бұрын
The Provisonal Patent Application does not require Claims.Will the Specification suffice, with particular emphatic protection by citing the Invention ?For example, in the preamble preceding the Specification, begin with the heading,"claim of invention"
@joeysixstring24426 жыл бұрын
This sounds a lot like the arguments for and against the “plain meaning” approach in contract interpretation.
@bruce7mail1227 жыл бұрын
Professor Wagner, in close of Lecture 12, you refer to a recent case, Tavo vs. Sanders, promised for further discussion. Where is the discussion? I look forward to hearing your perspective. Please direct!