Lecture 16 - Example 2: Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

Lecture 16: Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
Example 16-106 Hibbeler Dynamics Book

[@jambooskate5840]

I'm an engineering student in Ontario. This is the best explanation of solving a dynamics question.. it was concise and easy to follow. Could you please solve more Rigid body questions from RC Hibbeler? Thank you for being awesome. Absolutely terrific solution.

[@m.fatihdinc4675]

berfect, 10 boint solution. it really helbed

[@bhosh]

Purdue Engineering student, USA. Best explanation I've ever come across. Absolutely phenomenal, thank you!

[@AndrewTheRocketCityRailfan4014]

So helpful. Now that’ll make exam preparation easier

[@jc_hz4196]

You have earned my subscription. Very well detailed it’s all I needed , great help for my final

[@NicoXBT]

You truly are a master! Thanks a lot for the clear explanation

[@studyu1]

عظيم جدا جزاك الله خيرا

[@Onzyshineray]

sir you make me understand now thanks. alot from Malaysia🇲🇾

[@cagdastemel3729]

Very smooth and clear explanation. Thank you so much for this amazing and helpful video.

[@thewhiteshiba4026]

Great video, really helped!

[@pridez6132]

Much clear than my lecturer. good job

[@williamwelmans8648]

Thank you so much, a wonderful lecture!

[@williamwelmans8648]

A lovely tutorial... Thank you!

[@williamwelmans8648]

A very nice lecture, thank you!

[@khaledshikh8436]

انت رجال❤

[@odirelengkalabatane]

Thank you for the clear lecture.

[@nizarhaidar5225]

thank you Dr. Faysal

[@ccn690]

Thank you, this is very helpful ✨

[@johnbarneswood]

Very helpful!

[@martindomoszlai1026]

Thank you a lot sir!

[@padaddadada5417]

Thank you for this lecture

[@melkamukassie9586]

thank you /// you are helpfull

[@ibrahimbilal3090]

This was GOOD

[@ejminava407]

Thank you so much

[@wendel5933]

excellent

[@divyapandey4347]

Can you solve it by I center method ???

[@devrimeskibina9521]

At 17.04, I think alpha CB should be -k not +k. Since alpha ab is -k

[@DrewMann]

Was it an oversight at 10:21 when you wrote -0.5 omega cb? Should that have been -0.8 omega cb instead?

[@meorpaan9771]

I saw that too

[@blakelayton4794]

Yes, I agree with you. But I think the answer he gives as omega cb = 3 is correct.

[@tikaram4349]

Now I can solve numerical of gate exam

[@sarabhian2270]

Well it's pretty nice, isn't it?

[@karinalopezzamora922]

if V_c is only moving horizontally, why did you consider the j component?

[@faysalfayezful]

Vc moved in both i and j directions - it was resolved

[@yousefmagdi4657]

I love you.

[@hyoukagaming_n_graphics2150]

why do alpha cb is considered anti clockwise? alpha ab is clockwise slowing down Wab.. so why alpha cb speeding up Wcb?

[@smokeypillow]

I think its just an assumption

[@johnbarneswood]

I agree with Smokey, it's just an assumption. It's a wrong assumption though. This part tripped me up as well.

[@oktoluq]

Why do you put minus for the term ω²r

[@faysalfayezful]

Luqman Hakim it is the rule

[@pradumn9800]

Hello Sir I didn't get resolve of Velocity of slider in X and Y direction ..please make it clear

[@dre160]

It's a right triangle pointing down and to the left. I'm sure you get it now since it's been 2 years.