Lecture 8 | Case Of Poles On The Real Axis|Improper Integration| Theta Classes

[@HarshKumar-yx9lv]

Residue for z=1 k liye nikala toh extra -1 kese aaya agar common liya toh kese liya

[@MrAAMNNITAllahabad]

In 37:02 why you added -1?? Please let me know. And thank you for the video, really helpful.

[@thetaclasses]

In numerator we have (z-1) and in denominator we have (1-z) so I have taken -1 as common from denominator so that our term becomes -1x (z-1) so now (z-1) when cancel out from both numerator and denominator we get -1

[@md.shadmanshakib5318]

Really Awesome

[@ashishprajapati2220]

Thanks 🙏 sir for wonderful lecture

[@harry-ho9ti]

a heartful thanks sir for uploading the valuable lecture.

[@krushnachandrashankhua637]

Nice explanation sir👍

[@md.shadmanshakib5318]

U r really good...

[@yasardimashqi6907]

Perfect! Thanks.

[@md.shadmanshakib5318]

Very helpful no doubt

[@MrDot-qp2wi]

Love from odisha

[@md.shadmanshakib5318]

Love from Bangladesh

[@AmitYadav-ol9fj]

Sir jab pole real axis par hai fir bhi uspe kyo residue nikal rhe hai ...us points ko to identate kar diya jata hai na ???

[@thetaclasses]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nJa9k4BjaadqoM0 do check this lecture in which I had explained your query

[@rushikeshaoley8284]

very helpful

[@ravisinghchauhan2754]

But here P(z) and Q(z) are polynomial, then how can apply this theorem.

[@thetaclasses]

main focus of theorem is to make sure that poles lying on real axis or not.

[@little_bit_curious5122]

thank you sir

[@tathagattripathi1203]

Sir, ye jo dono questions aapne karaye usme contour konsa le rahe ?

[@thetaclasses]

This is the lecture in which I had explained a contour which should be taken when poles lies on the real axis kzbin.info/www/bejne/nJa9k4BjaadqoM0

[@ashishprajapati2220]

Thanks 🙏 sir

[@rishikasingh0773]

Thanks sir