Legal Errors in Family Law Cases

[@MCR1565]

47:00… spot on! Thank you!🙏

[@roberts735]

Can you touch on; constitutional rights, equal protection rights, due process, quasi criminal, separation of powers, supremacy clause….

[@SpeakerLawFirm]

Yes, we are going to have a webinar on constitutional rights in family law cases in the next season (starts Nov 2023)

[@cathycoryell2351]

Most likely defaults to State's Rights. The USA is fundamental built on States having ability to have different laws governing them. Family law included. What applies in Michigan, will be different in NY, or CA or PA, etc. Esp. In child supoort calculations. All States will say, if you can't work it out with the other parent, then yeah, the state will drive key decisions like education, housing, medical care decisions. It's hard to accept. Good luck.

[@PocketInquires]

​@@SpeakerLawFirm Why would you pledge to post a video regarding _Constitutional Rights_ in a Civil Law Jurisdiction where almost none of them apply? The Constitution doesn't _give_ to citizens any rights - rather, it created and empowered the government to _Protect_ the rights of citizens. These cases are heard almost always in a criminal jurisdiction, with Article III judges - with very few exceptions. Family Law, to start with under very few exceptions, is a _State_ issue and Not Federal. Rather than Article III judges, "Support" hearings are conducted by "Magistrates", "Hearing Officers", "Support Magistrates" who are not elected, but become "judges" under appointment of an actual judge who has to authorize the actions, findings and rulings of the magistrate. Article III judges get their job descriptions from the Constitution. Family Law hearing officers are guided by Administrative Law, not _"Constitutional"_ Law or even "Civil" Law. It's actually more Commercial than anything else, but that's another story. Article 1 §8 Clause 3 (the Commerce Clause) is as far as Administrative Law wants to go to analyze the Constitutionally Protected Rights of Citizens. So, the Supremacy Clause never becomes a point of record.

[@danemuma9323]

Child support 😂 when will men and women wake up. No man can be forced to pay support. It is a voluntary scheme. A man has constitutional rights that has full rights to his son's and daughters. Now a man should always take care of their son's and daughters but never through the State of corruption ​@@cathycoryell2351

[@RW5_88]

Very informative insight from the speakers. Thank you for sharing your knowledge & experience.

[@cherribrown4937]

Yall are awesome! Very informational and beyond helpful for anyone involved in any custody case. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SUCH A WIDE VARIETY OF INSIGHTS!..thank you!

[@brandonharvey7939]

The State needs to start educating the public so they understand that when 2 consenting adults create a child together, they not only agree to co-parent with the State but that they surrender power to the State to make unilateral decisions that will determine the course of the child's entire life and that the person making those decisions arent going to spend more than 5 minutes contemplating them. Had I known this prior to conceiving a child, under no circumstance would I have done so in the State of Michigan and I urge everyone who plans to conceive a child or who is expecting a new born child to do their research and get out of this State before it is too late because once they sink their hooks in, you and your kid are screwed for life and theres no escape.

[@TeddyShraderjr-h5l]

Your ignorance is showing hard .. lol . You wanna be Owned that's on you so keep your opinion to yourself 🐑. You know nothing about this Sham system

[@GaryWilliamowski]

Friend of the court makes a percentage of the money so does the courts. And visitation is base on child support mother have custody that means more money for her and the state

[@christyschaar957]

Wonderful content! May Lord bless you for making great use of your knowledge!!!!

[@EmpowerYourMoney]

I drafted and was granted a motion for reconsideration in my divorce and child custody case. Question- why are abused parties allowed to drop charges. The issue with dropping charges must and demands psychological intervention and a stay. Thank you.

[@jenniferthom]

I kept bringing up the statutes and was ignored.

[@TeddyShraderjr-h5l]

Because statutes aren't laws... That help you?

[@blazebrown9102]

Can you speak regarding a Bias GAL that does not submit supporting documents for Guardianship of a handicapped adult family member?

[@TheHolliHolland]

What documents? 😄 I never got a report. One wasn't provided in court either.

[@blazebrown9102]

​​@@TheHolliHolland Are you saying the GAL did not submit supportive documents in what he stated in court? You can request a report from the attorney handling the case or the Court system and use the case number to identify what you're looking for.

[@GaryWilliamowski]

You lawyer know child support is not law its all commercial contracts .

[@TeddyShraderjr-h5l]

Yep exactly . I got so much stuff recorded down about this Extorted,trafficking system. I do believe now since 1995 Supreme Court Ruling about welfare being Backfilled was Shutdown. So now it acts under treaty(Hague) and under other U N Conventions. And so when the county sets up child support orders to the Hague that makes the counties acting as a foreign reciprocating country. So that goes to say why is a state doing treaties? Only countries can be into treaties not States. All courts are operating under the trading with the enemy act as codified entitled 50 USC total 28 USC chapter 176 federal debt collection both of office makes anyone in government a foreign agent.

[@jenniferwyatt8945]

What happens during the initial hearing if the movant doesn't meet the burden of proof? Because the FCC instead of ending things assigned a GAL. And much ignoring of the law by the FCC

[@Devfullfaithandcredit]

Families don't care about how busy your days are , or how long the it takes to go throe all the evidance. Got it admitted . It's your job. . Maybe, your should actually do some case management conferences. Work out some of thes evidentiary issues pre trial . Admit the evidance

[@melisataghon3007]

They are the judge! Why do I need to educate them???

[@conceptobject]

Because they only have 3 years of education.

[@MrProfessional777]

Because they don't care. No accountability.

[@candyvarvel]

I was told my daughter was given to her father (not married in Ohio) due to my military service. (Dual military) Is that even legal? I was her primary care provider. I was not active duty, just National Guard so i was only going to be away for my training.

[@845Zaza]

I like the lady at the bottom

[@GaryWilliamowski]

Nothing but office water cooler talk because all state use no fault divorce act . The need the mother to say he hit me get a order of protection on him then she can get the children because she asking the court for the children until the divorce then the judge will say she had them for two years. Best interest they use what such Bull shit

[@torrinjohn]

Why don't you follow the federal rules set out in the green book under section 8? Calling this person a judge in this matter is a lie!

[@torrinjohn]

I bet your don't share the same legal coaching to pro se defendant...

[@Devfullfaithandcredit]

Smile , and keep taking the money .