LEGO Star Wars Clone Turbo Tank (Timelapse & Review) - Set 75151

The 2016 edition of the Clone Turbo Tank is here! I compare the 2005 and 2010 version against the newest version of this massively big vehicle!
- Ages 8-14 | Pcs. 903 | $109.99
Thank You for watching my review on this set, don't forget to subscribe and get the latest updates as well as following me on:
INSTAGRAM: / minifigs4u
TWITTER: / solid_brix
SBS FACEBOOK: / solidbrixstudios
M4U FACEBOOK: / minifigs4u
FLICKR: www.flickr.com/...
SITE: www.minifigs4u.com

[@jannisbaur4227]

The Lego Sets are going to be smaller and smaller, I Hate that!

[@nickhechtel640]

yeah that is why I stopped building Lego, because it costs nearly the same

[@samjones7988]

This set is way more accurate

[@ABrickInterest]

+nick hechtel You could just build without buying sets.

[@jdstudios1912]

It's sad but true eventually though people will stop buying and lego will have to 're think this op pricing

[@TheFettuck]

Or the Star Wars license became more expensive because of Disney!! :D

[@brendan2550]

All I would prefer is more mini figs, and it to be larger

[@TheVeganwife]

5 NEW Solid Brix Reviews in 2 days! LOVE IT!!!!!!

[@landen872]

In summary it's a smaller more convenient playable version for kids of the 2005 one

[@HellDoggyjr]

Well you know what, since I never had ANY T tanks. I'm quite happy buying this set and just upsizing it with spare parts, Isn't that the beauty of lego? Plus I really love the lil AT-RTs.

[@mohamedelsayed7032]

best set in 2016

[@FERRERofficial]

With its size, it reminds me of the horrible AAT we got

[@eoinkelly6993]

lego needs to make play sets and MOC sets for star wars

[@amaanmohamed7743]

this is reduced to 78 pounds Gb (95 dollars US) should i buy it?

[@AdamG1983]

The watchtower is kind of ridiculous. Pretty exposed to sniper fire.

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

I know, you could easily get shot. When I get this set, I might modify that tower.

[@mariovelez578]

its not a grenade, its a thermal detonator!

[@mariovelez578]

and you didn't give your rating

[@matthewpennington6679]

I have been asking some people wether I should get this set. everyone says go for it. the main reason I was going to get it was because I never had any of the other turbo tanks. if I picked up this one it would be my first. should I get it? or try to get the clone wars one on eBay? any advice????

[@matthewpennington6679]

***** Thanks for the input!

[@jeffreymuu5451]

+dominic ks yeah good luck trying to find it for 110$ and in the box 😒

[@billiejoebassstudios8511]

the at-rt driver are actully scout trooper

[@kikkoproductions307]

Lego really needs too step it up....

[@rokdri9983]

gotta go fast- LEGO enterprise

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

Why is everybody beating this set to death? The thing is, LEGO have focused on making the tank great quality and that it does not break with quite an impact of something, or if it hits something. It has more detail on it as well. It is hard and would cost more to make the tank large and as sturdy as it is that size with this set. I mean you can still fit troops inside it and a lot of things inside the front cabin and rear cabin. It also has those spring loaded rocket and grenade launchers unlike the previous two which is cool. I am a fan of cannons that fire. And for those who say "you can't fit troops inside", well just replace those tiles with plates in the central compartment then you can sit troops there. So the size is not that big of a problem to me and I might still get it.

[@sheldon_o]

i agree

[@Sonaint]

Why the fuck would lego focus on impact its fuckign retarded

[@courtesywater6hi992]

And here we have the Lego salesman of the month👏👏👏👏@TheBrickGuy7939

[@matthewalbright8951]

I could just modify my 2010 version

[@danielmayayo4533]

I did, looks much better than this

[@Trollmaster925]

Daniel Mayayo did u include a look out tower on your 2010 one? If u did, could u explain to me how you did it

[@LEGOMINDBREAKERCS]

LEGO is getting very stingy.

[@lightseeker2349]

Sounds like the world today.

[@bbdoeslegos9404]

@@lightseeker2349 little did you know...

[@toedplays]

Wow, that's so much smaller.

[@DesertRider760]

+lord litten covington So true. They keep downsizing it seems like

[@fan9775]

+lord litten covington Is it contagious!?😲 (failed dbz abridged reference)

[@marcosbuslon5271]

+lord litten covington he is the smartest man on earth

[@marcosbuslon5271]

+Cole Hersey stupid kid

[@tk-5509]

+Cole Hersey Probaly he is 6 year old. .

[@mightknight123]

Remember the latest versions of the AAT and the MTT? When all this stupid "downsizing" started. I was really hoping, Lego learned something from releasing these two sets prior to this new turbo tank. But obviously they didn't.

[@mightknight123]

RJAWolfe07 Can't deny nor confirm this, but it sounds really likely to be the case. At least, that would explain a lot.

[@slufffyg503]

One day a battle map will cost $40 and only come with two minifighes.

[@tostie3110]

+RJAWolfe07 I'd like to blame Disney, but luckily they have nothing to do with the Star Wars lisence Lego has. I remember how ridiculously expensive the Cars sets were.

[@poalima6527]

Aloysius O'Hare it's an AT-ATC

[@thebrockster8783]

Hazmat Hazard You know, every vehicle they make is downsized, bar a few. The At At has always been downsized, so if they ever do one, it’s gonna be downsized, it’s just not possible. Look up how large those things are, they’d me about a meter tall or more in LEGO form

[@oom-3262]

Well, it may be smaller, but i like it. It looks better finished than the other versions...

[@venom-123]

And has the small walker which is cool to me

[@zeriman7773]

im getting a turbo tank soon but i dont know which one to get so which one do you think i should get the 2016 or the 2010?

[@paulovitor9388]

​@@zeriman77732010. I'll get the 2010 too, but later

[@nickgrushin9407]

When you want to buy this set but your broke as shit

[@vvv1761]

True we could build our own if we look up the the instruction online

[@brendan2550]

+Rijfvmjiwvfeovfnovfwdnojjowndvfjnivwfnjiwvf then how will you get the parts?

[@brendan2550]

+Rijfvmjiwvfeovfnovfwdnojjowndvfjnivwfnjiwvf then how will you get the parts?

[@Jomoman]

Go on eBay buy the older ones when you get the cash this one is no where near worth the money.

[@PrinceMarcusWilliam]

Brick Link

[@legopieface]

Lego Star Wars is getting lazy, while also getting more expensive. I'm done purchasing them tbh.

[@NuclearPineapple]

Buy the old sets instead. Much better investment.

[@benjaminrobertson4034]

ikr its so lame now days like the cantina force awakens jeez Lego pick it up bros

[@SageSea1]

don't listen to pinapple old sets are clunky and off from 2006 and under. plus the newer minfigs are great, and the vehicles are alot more packed and have more play features, so what if they're a little smaller? some of them are bigger actually, and this set is still good, just it and the mtt are really downsized, but still fun unless your trying to reenact the movies for some reason

[@legopieface]

Andrew Bultemaa Oooh, 400 pieces dedicated to a play feature I'll use once and never use again! Sometimes less is more.

[@SageSea1]

legopieface im not just talking little missiles and crap, boo to them, but the way things unfold, or hold things, or get a handle you know. if you don't ever use those more than once, then it's clear your sets probably just sit and collect dust

[@legoman716]

imagine a ucs-version in proper minifigure-scale of this ...!

[@sapporo1664]

That would be a couple thousand pieces to much

[@ThatOneGuy46696]

19:35 You forgot to adjust for inflation. The 2010 set is worth ~$131, and the 2005 version is worth ~$120. On scale, none of LEGO's interpretations are to scale. The A6 Juggernaut, of which LEGO have been basing the sets off of, has wheels that are more than 4 times the size of a clone trooper. I have, however, measured, and can confirm, that this set is one minifigure (scaled to 1.83 meters, rounded to 2 meters) from being the smaller, Legends model... the A5 Juggernaut.

[@scottywatts7698]

Mind exploded

[@conneredlauer1429]

Honestly I would much rather have a first order star destroyer

[@conneredlauer1429]

it doesn't have to small it could just be the size of the 2014 one

[@jeffreymuu5451]

+Conner Edlauer yeah good luck building the docks and all those complicated sloping shit

[@jeffreymuu5451]

You mean a resurgent class star destroyer?

[@conneredlauer1429]

Jeffrey Muu yeah it could be close to what the size of the 2014 one or the venator class cruiser from the clone wars

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

I have never had a large Clone Turbo Tank before so I will just get this. I have the Microfighters Clone Turbo Tank though.

[@king_solo_boss8719]

All the new sets are just stupid and disney is slowly making lego sets smaller and prices are just dumb

[@crazymau5fan521]

Disney isn't involved dumbass

[@deepzi2452]

+Crazy Mau5 Fan Disney owns Lego... Disney owns Star Wars... Fucking Disney owns everything

[@crazymau5fan521]

+Khoi Le you're an idiot for thinking that.

[@SageSea1]

in the long run, disney does not control how sets are made, they only enforce what general direction the sets be made, and bask under the lego license. they're also involved in producing and marketing, though.

[@thundering_fox]

+Crazy Mau5 Fan well they kinda do...

[@Justinlm99]

Luminaree Ubduli? Really, bruh...

[@tr-8rthestormtrooperthatsa299]

Dude, I think he has a speech problem or something, calm down.

[@lukedavis237]

no... it was just a mispronunciation for lack of knowledge about the character...

[@PanCakeFace]

1. That's not how u spell her name 2. If u watch ep 3 of Star Wars she is in the background

[@therhun5938]

I stopped buying/building lego just cuz everything is getting smaller and it costs more 🤑

[@thundering_fox]

True I still try to get the older sets that I don't have...

[@bmwalker611]

+Thundering Dragon same

[@swaggonaut8680]

I like the smaller one now better. I build Mocs and because of this a smaller one is really helpful

[@parahthemad]

Nice review! Have you considered doing a moc mixing allthe best features of each clone turbo tank, Dave?

[@Ryan-wx4jw]

Yeah! That would be awesome!

[@3Moloch]

Artifex Creations has a RC moc of the turbo tank

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

I have seen that it is so cool.

[@cupodesigns5517]

In this era, we still use steering wheels..

[@ericmichaud1273]

In my opinion, this set needed more clone troopers.

[@venom-123]

Yeah and 2 walkers

[@nuclearstudios7497]

Certain youtubers deserve 1M+ Subscribes, such as Noble Artist or Solid Brix Studios. But, They need more ideas, different video ideas, more things. For example, Solid Brix studios should do more moc building, ( he already did ), and stop motion. With all those minificgures You have, You should stop motion like certain battles from clones wars but in Lego form. Or custom battles. That will get your attention, and grab more. It may take time, work and effort, but it all is worth it when you see your youtube check in the mail with tons of 0s behind large numbers.

[@thefifth5hot]

Holy shit this is tiny compared to the other ones and it's almost the same price. Definitely not worth it in my opinion

[@mitchhirt]

I've never had any kind of turbo tank, the 2010 one got discontinued when I was saving up for it. This one, despite the size, seems adequate, especially considering the prices of the old ones now

[@lukethoms5198]

I legit remember watching you when I was 8 now I'm 13 and love the vids still keep it going

[@EricGallant24]

Oh my god please redo your review of the 2010 version. you sound drunk and you harp on how annoying Ashoka was in the show

[@delta_.]

This is my favorite set in this wave tbh

[@thl0236]

My too, because I dont have a turbo tank so I buyed this new version and I like it

[@marcosbuslon5271]

+Yeah bro it's because you don't know the better versions

[@lightseeker2349]

+Marcos Buslon Not everyone is fortunate enough to own the 2010 or 2005 versions even though they are better. For some people who started with Lego later, this set is good enough.

[@marcosbuslon5271]

+LightSeeker258 fair enough

[@jonedwards5953]

+LightSeeker258 starting to become an oldie. my sets are typically 2008 to 2012, with the turbo tank and the malevolence being my favorite large sets i own.

[@anthonyspitery6332]

I would pay money on ebay just for Luminara and Quinlan Vos

[@GoldLeader1100]

Anthony Spitery hah me to bro that's what I thought as well during the review!

[@firstorderfrank3301]

Notice how only the prequel sets are getting smaller. ( turbo tank, mtt, aat).

[@gunnarhenning7070]

i got this for $80 bucks on amazon

[@thedan836]

The G channel me too

[@TheTranq]

I've been an avid Lego Star Wars fan my whole life, but I haven't purchased any of the recent sets because they are so small and overpriced. Hoping Lego makes a return soon

[@BattlefieldPlayer]

Probs not. Lego will keep riding the Star Wars hype train because the movies will be a big in the years to come.

[@bwah8787]

360 p worth it! ;) nice vid man! reply?

[@ninjatacoshark]

I'm probably just going to try to get the 2010 version off eBay because this set is really disappointing

[@SageSea1]

just because it's tiny bit longer does not make it better. this beats the old one in every other way (set wise, because pricing still ridiculous)

[@SageSea1]

ok just realized other thing is like 25% bigger, but this is still alot better in many other ways, modify the 2010 version to look like this, but keep size, and you have a real clone turbo tank

[@jdstudios1912]

I know a guy who has one his name is dccmaster he'd sell it off

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

Just put some studded plates in the central compartment where the AT RT goes, then you can fit troops in this one.

[@jonnydonny9411]

I Would but th 2010 one of you

[@the_headless_horseman9682]

I got this set few weeks ago and I really like it. The only somewhat problem is the size, but all the other things make up for it. It has great minifigs ( new Luminara and Quinlan ), the details are great and that AT RT is great ( especially cause it's so small, not like all the other oversized ones) .

[@aquatibrick387]

Technically, the AT-ST is known as the "chicken walker", but I suppose AT-RTs have a similar way of walking. Lol :P

[@ThatOneGuy46696]

I got a 2010 version, all that is left intact is a portion of the frame :(

[@poalima6527]

I'm a bit surprised they didn't include Yoda like from episode 3 order 66 where Yoda slices off Commander Gree and a scout troopers heads off.

[@viperson9818]

Still waiting for a second episode 3 at rt as he said

[@romyenigma]

You know what? I don’t care if it’s “too small”, it’s cool and detailed, the at-rt is cool too. But if they added more mini figs it would have justified it’s price.

[@owenfleming8922]

guys, 120$ in 2010 is about 130 today. And 90 in 2005 is about 110 today. Lego is getting better quality. You must take inflation into account

[@captainkappa9067]

I've never owned the 2006 or 2010 versions, so the size isn't really a problem for me. I do think it looks a bit small, but the detail and the modifications I've made (a removable clone deployment platform and an improved scout tower) make up for that.

[@PrinceMarcusWilliam]

David you keep calling the missiles flick missiles. Its just spring loaded while the other form is flick fire.

[@datkrazikid]

Who’s still watching in 2020 waiting for another turbo tank??????

[@the23rdradiotower41]

Would you get this for 20 dollars off and no figs? Hypothetically…

[@tylervoza3796]

this set may be small, but it fits in the 2 lanes on road plates, so you can run it down your city streets, and run everything and everyone over.

[@deusxinvisiblewar3]

I have the 2005 version: do you recommand me to buy this one ?

[@TepidWater]

When he drags the set across the table, the scraping sound really hurts my ears

[@benjaminrobertson4034]

imagine a minifig scale tho amazing

[@N05L31]

I like this set despite the size. However, I'm actually pretty surprised that there's a significant size difference between this and the 2005 one. I expected that from the 2010 version, but definitely not the 2005 one. The small price difference makes sense since a US dollar is worth much less now than it was in 2010

[@Markgangzta]

Missed the 2010 version but do have the 2005 version and honestly I think this one looks a lot better. I loved it as a kid but now it just looks like shit and the minifigures are pretty awful. I also don't care about size, people really don't understand how scale works. A turbo tank at minifig scale would easily be the biggest set lego has ever made, and people want it for like $90 lmao.

[@bambostarla6259]

Walrusberg the minifigures are pretty rare. I can confirm that the tank itsself is VERY frail

[@TheTranq]

The original turbo tank in 03 was the best by far

[@kslo6179]

TheTranq *05

[@mikelife2831]

He sounds so depressed when he did this reviews

[@willbourque2810]

Need another turbo tank fr.

[@adrianlau6683]

The 2010 tank is honestly the best tank, in terms of looking good while being big in size

[@bricksickstudiosbricksicks8171]

I only want the at-rt and Jedi

[@munirnayfeh94]

reminds me of the 2014 mtt

[@endercoplp8602]

I would realy like it if the make new Versionen of old sets with only One versions or something new like an Episode 3 UT AT

[@camflanagan8945]

I stopped buying legos a few years ago but I love your content u were the first youtuber that I started watching years ago. I have watched all u vids and will continue to! have fun in ur apartment. I plan on buying the turbo tank.

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

Why is everybody beating this set to death? The thing is, LEGO have focused on making the tank great quality and that it does not break with quite an impact of something, or if it hits something. It has more detail on it as well. It is hard and would cost more to make the tank large and as sturdy as it is that size with this set. I mean you can still fit troops inside it and a lot of things inside the front cabin and rear cabin. It also has those spring loaded rocket and grenade launchers unlike the previous two which is cool. I am a fan of cannons that fire. And for those who say "you can't fit troops inside", well just replace those tiles with plates in the central compartment then you can sit troops there. So the size is not that big of a problem to me and I will still get it.

[@erykchatian963]

Nice....Finally someone who have mind!!!

[@TheBrickGuy7939]

Eryk Chatian I am not actually sure if I will get this one or the 2010 one. But either way, this one still had a lot of effort put into it.

[@happymcjingles1.03]

They don't call AT-RT's chicken walkers, a chicken walker is the AT-ST... I know because of Starwars battle front 2.

[@jeffreymuu5451]

And he new one which lacks content

[@highlandshereditary1749]

+Jeffrey Muu same... I much prefer battlefront II... Not many people actually know about it... It's sad come to think of it... Much better game

[@HolocronStudios]

I don’t know if I built mine wrong, but my doors keep caving in, and the hinges for the doors squeak alot

[@Cnw8701]

Well, at least I finally have something that will fit on my shelf (better than my 2006 Star Destroyer, anyway).

[@TheBenjaman]

wow this comment section compared to for example jang brix or the brick show comment section is so different. It complains alot more and is less nice to each other.

[@ABrickInterest]

I think you guys should just go on bricklink and buy one of the clone wars turbo tanks without the figs.

[@terminallumbago0781]

i want this set cuz it has quilan voss

[@terminallumbago0781]

+happy duckyyy ps im aware i spelt his name wrong

[@JakobKaiserMOCs]

Quinlan Vos and Luminara 're lookin' pretty neat, but the rest is mostly crap.

[@thedetective6500]

"Little bit of a different spin" ha, ha ha, I got that. Different spin, wheels spin, ha!

[@say_bray]

the only thing I want about this instead of size is MORE CLONES GOD IS CALLED CLONE TURBO TANK LOOK AT THE CLONE PART IT'S NOT THE JEDI TURBO TANK LEGO UPDATE THIS FOR MORE CLONES

[@SineXTroid]

I hate the size of the new 2016 Turbo Tank so much. Why is Lego making all the remake of old sets smaller and more expensive? Since I do like the new updated Lego Quinlan Vos & Luminara Unduli in the set I'm still going to get it for my Jedi Collection. I was really hoping for the Turbo Tank to be in almost similar size as the older ones.

[@ordahnumbah2063]

$110???!!!?!???!?!?! for that shit? damn I'm glad I gave up Legos years ago before this happened.

[@jack_does_whatever]

Whoah man, don't get a common grenade confused with a THERMAL DETONATOR! Big difference dude... Great vid btw.

[@GretchentheAlligator]

Its way too small! Ive noticed how the sets have gotten way smaller since the clone wars sets, the Republic Gunship, AT-TE, AT-RT, Turbo Tank, the Republic Fighter Tank, the MTT, the Droid Gunship, but yet the prices stay the same so wtf lego! I'm so glad I got the bigger better clone wars sets!

[@erykchatian963]

U call this expensive what about minifigs4u shop.......!? XD

[@dorkingbubble]

I don't think the smaller size of this turbo tank matters to most kids since they probably won't be comparing it to the 2005 or 2010 versions. I can understand how it's size may be disappointing to seasoned collectors though. Same goes for the 75080 AAT.

[@redtsar]

I think they made it smaller cause they're thinking about this set for kids, just like the MTT they did recently (All they had to friggen do is make the MTT 7662 in Seperatist blue and i would buy 10 in a heartbeat). They're jus thinking about the kids that are just getting into the star wars hype like david said, which sux.

[@Bandoolero]

boys i bought the 2010 version without minifigs, command center, walker for $40. i'm a happy puppy.

[@ABrickInterest]

You never adjust for inlfation when comparing past prices... 90$ in 2005 is the same as $120 in our time

[@spadesofpaintstudios1719]

The trubotank from 2005 is better it came with exclusive minifigures like light up mace windu and clones

[@VorpalSlade]

Is it just me or did they use the back of 2010 for the front of 2016 (roughly, of course)? When he flipped it I was like wait what the front of the new one is smaller than not only the front of the 2010 one but the BACK of it, too??

[@hamst3rgod979]

Clicked on video "SLAM" May have slightly jumped

[@TheVeganwife]

Can you please put your Ep7 Stormtrooper STANDEE behind you?

[@countdooku3890]

should i Buy it for 80 dollars

[@eliteastrea]

Fisch55 555 yeah

[@elipaul9289]

This set isn't necessarily bad, but its just to overpriced. For the price they obviously should have made it bigger, maybe included another clone or wookie and a spider droid. I like the minifigs and the at-rt walker and the build is pretty good, but its just way to small and also has no space inside for the minifigs to stand. And I also hate the stud-shooters.

[@masterofrecipe5972]

Clone Turbo Tank is an inaccurate name for this model it should be called Clone Tiny Tank. If it were $30 cheaper it might be worth it.

[@kytrucking67]

So disappointed wanted this real bad but size wise its weak. I hope lego isn't going in the direction of smaller sets I will be buying a lot less if this is the case. Good review I'll buy another 2010 set!!!

[@NTC_Overwatch]

Big Sets keep getting smaller, but other sets are sized pretty consistently. At this point, LEGO just keeps cutting corners on big sets.

[@dalekperov]

I waited so long for new edition of Turbo Tank and I'm absolutely disappointed. Now I understand I need previous version.

[@kylemeneses7359]

remake of Jabbas SailBarg= smaller, remake of the Clone Turbo Tank= smaller. why lego?

[@ethanroberts9043]

In my opinion, the size of this thing doesn't matter to me. I had the 2010 CTT and it was terrible. it fell apart just from me rolling it around on my couch. I think that the quality is better in this one so therefore this one was worth spending my money on.

[@kevin77111]

vader's tie vs a wing, jakku, rex at-te, and this all overpriced. only FO tie fighter and takodana in last batch...looks to be a new trend

[@dayo2411]

I miss old Lego sets they were big and cool but I'm watching on September 28 2016 and I just built it and I thought I was missing some bags and it is so smalllllll