I am a scientist who spent a year looking into this in 1994 . We consistently found palladium transmuted into silver, but lack of funding prevented further research.
@W1LdnKaiАй бұрын
Meanwhile billions were being blown on hot fusion...
@msxcytbАй бұрын
@@W1LdnKaimaybe not consistent or credible enough…
@jamieclarke321Ай бұрын
My professor told me he had seen lattice confinement making palladium glow
@mathoph26Ай бұрын
Interresting, did you publish or preprint somewhere ?
@Daniel-jk7peАй бұрын
@mathoph26 yeah it's published in the science journal of My Ass
@markspannАй бұрын
Gareth, at first I thought your opening comment that "a discovery so revolutionary it could rewrite the laws of physics" was directed at the LENR field in general, until I got to the end of the video. When you suggested that LENR is in need of a unifying theoretical framework to explain the highly variable experimental results, that's when I nearly jumped out of my seat because I knew where you were going. I'm in total agreement, and Indeed this has been the greatest obstacle to moving the LENR field forward in my opinion, and without question the Structured Atom Model has the potential to become the greatest scientific discovery ever. Edo Kaal and his team have laid the foundation for SAM but what is needed now, is for more LENR researchers to help Kaal design experiments, and to run experiments specifically to test the validity of the SAM model. The experimental data is needed to help the SAM team continue to further refine the model, and the benefits to the LENR community could be enormous and vital to moving the field forward out of the morass that has plagued it for decades.
@josephlarrybradley508Ай бұрын
All bullshit. Down vote and mark channel as Don't recommend .
@trungtamienmayquocquang7233Ай бұрын
@@josephlarrybradley508 then you should go away
@esecallumАй бұрын
another video last year showed it was at the microscopic cracks where it was taking place due to very fields strengths or something
@ajayvee6677Ай бұрын
I agree with you @markspam. SAM in a rare local nuclear environment seems a fruitful Avenue to explore.
@Kaimelar8Ай бұрын
Most underrated channel on KZbin, thanks!
@Peter-o9n6pАй бұрын
Oh it's very highly rated with flerfs, moon-landing deniers, and electric universe types. They live for this stuff!
@GideonFerranteАй бұрын
@@Peter-o9n6p No, I think he was referring to the fact that Gareth objectively analyses the academic peer review circle jerk theories, with a full understanding of what they're saying, an ability to point out their strengths and flaws, while offering his own coherent remedies to those flaws, as well as shining a light criminally overlooked theories that actually make more sense in the grand scheme or at the very least provide potential answers to questions left hanging. FYI, this isn't an electric universe many alternatives to the standard model are featured, although elements of said hypothesis are reviewed with the same objectivity, and lack of bias (unlike purveyors of the belief system you are beholden to).
@GideonFerranteАй бұрын
@@Peter-o9n6p @Peter-o9n6p No, I think he was referring to the fact that Gareth objectively analyses the academic peer review circle jerk theories, with a full understanding of what they're saying, an ability to point out their strengths and flaws, while offering his own coherent remedies to those flaws, as well as shining a light criminally overlooked theories that actually make more sense in the grand scheme or at the very least provide potential answers to questions left hanging. FYI, this isn't an electric universe many alternatives to the standard model are featured, although elements of said hypothesis are reviewed with the same objectivity, and lack of bias (unlike purveyors of the belief system you are beholden to). Ok,?
@Kaimelar8Ай бұрын
@@Peter-o9n6p lol, I love the comparison to moon landing deniers, it's so clever and never been used before, brilliant! 😂
@karanlidder5319Ай бұрын
Thank you. More people need to look at everything through the electric universe model lens.
@markspannАй бұрын
Agreed, and it's fascinating that the SAM model is EU Theory compliant, as it were.
@corkygoss7403Ай бұрын
Nicely done. Now head over to the MFMP channel with Bob Greenyer in order to continue your study of LENR. You may have a way to go, but there's no hurry when energy has already/always been solved. We are so duped. Cheers.
@ng429Ай бұрын
I've been watching a lot of See the Pattern since it was recommended to me. I think he would be intrigued and I do not think Electric Universe or the Structured Atom Model would be at odds for Megnetohydrodynamics and fractal Tors at all. There might be some specifics where each one's current explanations may mildly conflict, but, from what I can see, these are all quite complimentary.
@michaelstiller2282Ай бұрын
Bob gets promoted here quite frequently.
@exponentialnegative1Ай бұрын
Haha don't worry Corky, Gareth is on it. Theres no coincidences
@efdangotuАй бұрын
Turtles all the way down.
@W1LdnKaiАй бұрын
@@exponentialnegative1I imagine he has been for some time! Gareth tends to play it safe while still being on to the bleeding edge tho
@dan.j.boydzkreationzАй бұрын
I'm sure SAFIRE would be included in LENR, as they saw transmutation
@fleetwoodbeechbumАй бұрын
That what's on my mind a lot.
@TheBelrickАй бұрын
Chickens can use transmutation and I am sure that they don't combust into 6000deg flames.
@markspannАй бұрын
SAFIRE indeed saw both excess energy and transmutations. They published only a fraction of their findings choosing to keep much of the more astonishing results for their private interests, which is of course their right.
@eastonjasАй бұрын
The tungsten probe they used was vaporised. HHO gas can vaporise tungsten though HHO gas only burns at around 130°C. Obviously it’s not the heat that causes the tungsten to vaporise.
@markspannАй бұрын
@@eastonjas That was one of the most astonishing results when the tungsten vaporized. To me it's still unclear what type of LENR reaction it was, perhaps an instantaneous & simultaneous fission/fusion cascade. This is why Gareth is rightfully calling for a return to the classical scientific approach - work to understand the underlying physics before venturing into the practical applications of the phenomena.
@neilcreamer8207Ай бұрын
Nicely summarised, Gareth. LENR is the epitome of pre-paradigmatic science. It's an area where a mass of disparate and sometimes conflicting results is waiting for theory to catch up. It's quite possible that uninspected assumptions are delaying that but this is definitely a space to keep watching.
@martinhastingsis28 күн бұрын
I Love This Chanel. Thanks Gareth and Happy New Year. I'm looking forward to an informative 2025. Blessings from New Zealand.
@SeethePattern17 күн бұрын
Thanks you and a Happy New Year to you as well.
@16ChandElierАй бұрын
Thanks a lot 🎉... appreciated if u can provide ppt or PDF file of this lecture for my students with refer of your page on youtube 🎉
@t00by00zerАй бұрын
Merry Christmas. Your channel is a real gift. Thank you.
@SeethePatternАй бұрын
Thank you and I hope you also have a fabulous Christmas
@ThienLuu-n3iАй бұрын
@@SeethePatternhey bro i want you have video about lerner please
@exponentialnegative1Ай бұрын
@ThienLuu-n3iugh Lerner doesnt have much updates... I want some too
@ThienLuu-n3iАй бұрын
@@exponentialnegative1 me too and mery christmas with family
@Chris.DaviesАй бұрын
Thank you. Michael McKubre's talks have been foundational in my acceptance of the LENR phenomena. He is a very experienced calorimetry scientist, and his decades of work at SRI International on the subject is unequivocal: there IS an anomalous heat effect, but until sufficient research into this new science is fully funded, and complete, there can be no product of more significance than a domestic water-heater booster. Which it must be said, all by itself, could save Terawatt hours each year if adopted.
@nixter1nixter1Ай бұрын
This episode in scientific history feels like a massive missed opportunity for humanity, I keep thinking how different the world might be today if this had been taken seriously in 1989. An enormous amount of wasted time and not enough effort was put into studying the claims. Eventually, irrefutable evidence will surface and the work can finally begin. I hope that the researchers who normalize the phenomenon will mention Fleischmann and Pons's work, and how they opened the door to the discovery.
@ericlipps9459Ай бұрын
We can hope, at least.
@ng429Ай бұрын
You, Sir, might be interested in checking out the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project if you are not yet familiar with them.
@corkygoss7403Ай бұрын
Thanks pal. I'm withholding comment until I listen, but you read my mind. If you aren't studying Bob Greenyer's work, you just aren't studying.
@uwekettering5566Ай бұрын
@@corkygoss7403 BOOOOM :)
@sFeral25 күн бұрын
@@corkygoss7403 Why hasn't he taken my advice and contacted some big experimenter youtubers to spread the knowledge through reproduction of the basic experimental proof (the existence of EVOs allegedly created in cavitation, sonoluminescence events)? Channels like TheThoughtEmporium have reproduced far more sophisticated experiments, including capturing sonoluminescence on video
@arcmodeАй бұрын
I think the logical conclusion is that LENR requires some synchronization between the internal structures of atoms or their nuclei (SAM model could provide a good starting point perhaps). This would explain why is not easily reproducible and appears to be "random". It would also explain the energy dissipation happening as an effect on the internal structures of initial atomic configurations required for the production of the resulting atomic structures.
@TomisaMakerАй бұрын
The Structured Atom Model (SAM) looks very familiar to me - it very similar what i have learned somewhere, where different elements build a compounds in specific geometric models like tetrahedrons, cubes, pyramids and is very similar to a VSEPR theory (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion) where you predict a shape of a molecule based on free electron pairs (:) and number of bonds(=) around a central atom - so SAM reminds me of VSEPR in that way - VSEPR but for atom structure (or atomic nuclei). What i find fascinating that neutron cant be on its own for very long as it "degrades" into proton, electron and anti-neutrino via beta-decay, but SAM says that a free neutron doesnt exist and it actually a proton and electron in a unstable state (why this reminds me of an hydrogen atom, i dont know - though it would be some unstable hydrogen atom, too with a anti-neutrino as surplus of energy). SAM look like a chemical bonds theory between elements, but in deeper level where bonds are formed between protons and electrons and neutrons doesnt exist - its all hydrogen in different states, all over again, which confuses me sometimes.
@TheIgnoramusАй бұрын
This. Very well done.
@davidsaintjohn4248Ай бұрын
Agreed. You can get a better SAM using tetrahedral neutrons which avoids this stuff
@DeathValleyDazedАй бұрын
Wow, loving this update after being at The U of Utah during the cold fusion controversy. Agree that with all the energy out there we must eventually obtain a low cost practical means of accessing this🤞
@qwerty90615Ай бұрын
Randell Mills' hydrino (hydrogen with below ground state electron) forming a virtual neutron to overcome Coulomb barrier was mentioned in this good video, but the vast majority of his work was not focused on nuclear reactions. You may want to consider the work of Mills for a future documentary.
@magnetsandmushroomsАй бұрын
Mills specifically states that there is NO LENR going on in his devices - so it should be automatically excluded from this topic.
@qwerty90615Ай бұрын
@magnetsandmushrooms At ~13:30, thie video mentions virtual neutron and Mills. Quoting Holverstott, 《In hydrino-catalyzed fusion (what Mills called “Coulombic Annihilation Fusion”) a hydrino molecule reduces the space between the two nuclei and promotes fusion events. It was not the dominant energy releasing process, but it could result in some nuclear byproducts. Mills’s first patent applications even focused on this possibility.》
@EugenethePhilostopherАй бұрын
Good overview. Thanks.
@robsting5408Ай бұрын
LENR is not in competition with fission. LENR reaction can produce around 20 MeV maximum. Fision releases ten times more. In addition, if one tries D+T, then the main energy production will be in neutron with the kinetic energy of ~15 MeV. The latter is very difficult to transform to heat, while the fission fragments will be stopped in few tens of micrometer, directly producing heat. Both the hot and cold fusions are not perspective in the practical manner.
@CeltokeeАй бұрын
Excellent and comprehensive. Touches on nearly every possibility, leaves out nearly nothing. Although there are two approaches not touched on, as they are mostly unknown. For example, nearly all the approaches (except one that is very briefly touched upon) ignore entropy as a cardinal barrier. The greatest offenders, of course, are the traditional, high-energy approaches, e.g., jamming masses of fusable material together via a fission explosion, or plasma confinement approaches. All **so** 1950s; they are neanderthal approaches. The anti-approach is one that addresses entropy as a barrier. All I'll say about that. The other (mostly unknown approach not touched on) is one that is out-of-the-box. Can't mention it in this forum. But thank you for a great job.
@W1LdnKaiАй бұрын
Where might you be able talk about such things? You've piqued my curiosity
@janap128Ай бұрын
Bose Einstein condensation is the mechanism that reduces entropy since all the constituent particles in the condensate have the same waveform and energy.
@CeltokeeАй бұрын
@@janap128 Very good point.
@janap128Ай бұрын
The out of date information about the LENR reaction that this video conveys needs a major update. There is a major point of confusion that this video is conveying. The LENR reaction has two separate aspects that do not interact: transmutation and power production. Recently developed LENR plasma reactors produce power formatted as direct electrical current power with minimal transmutation and heat production. Two systems designed by A. Rossi and G. Egely produce power directly without any excess heat output or transmutation. Other LENR systems approaches produce transmutation without energy production. The thunderstorm reactor by Thor is such a system that converts carbon in hydrocarbon combustion engine exhaust emissions into oxygen without the production of excess energy. See the Pattern, please do some research into the latest developments in LENR R&D.
@shdwbnndbyytАй бұрын
There are many (mostly military) research papers from the 1930's until the early 1980's that checked for elemental transmutatuions in biological systems. They found multiple cases where when plants or animals were deliberately shorted on one essential element, but provided with certain other ones, that the plants or animals continued to thrive and produce. One interesting case was with chickens surviving for over a year, while still providing eggs, while they had no calcium in their "ground", coops, nesting materials, water or feeds. When butchered the chickens had as strong of bones as those of the control group that did receive a calcium supplement added to their feed.
@CeltokeeАй бұрын
Interesting, but seems to me to be better explained by replacement (of one element for another) rather than transmutation.
@matthorrocks6517Ай бұрын
Yeah maybe. Seems a bit extreme to form an element from others. I've also heard of nuclear transmutation on underground explosions. Hmm. I guess that's off topic.
@mathoph26Ай бұрын
It is a really interresting topic that I was aware of since 10 years. At the time I did not have the computationnal level to understand quantum mechanics and nuclear physics. The thing is that nuclear force, i.e elementary bounding force between neutron and proton, are still unknown: we have only empiric laws, everywhere, even in standard model, there is no well define interraction such as the electrostatic attraction between electron and proton. Instead there is effective fields: in other words, fudge parameters potentials. So why not LENR ? Because we do not even understand the Deuterium nucleus (proton+neutron) almost 100 years after nuclear shell model.
@christopherleubner6633Ай бұрын
Simply certain metals that require two electrons to complete their orbital shells can dilute the space charge field around deuterium or tritium and the lowered activation energy makes quantum tunneling more likely. The low activation energy also causes odd products for example 2D will create helium 4 directly rather than 3He plus a neutron and a side reaction is creating hydrogen plus helium 3 and 2 tritium will generate two 3He. DT reaction is the same as the thermonuclear reaction creating 5He that immediately decompose to 4He and a free neutron.
@SpecYTandXАй бұрын
The stong force is gravity
@mathoph26Ай бұрын
@@christopherleubner6633 i am interrested, do you have any paper pdf on this one ?
@christopherleubner6633Ай бұрын
@mathoph26 you can find several papers on it from to OSTI server at ORNL. In short they were using palladium diffusion membranes to separate helium from DT mixtures and the membranes were destroying themselves, occasionally with significant energy that decay heat or pressure would not account for and producing neutrons.
@koenraad4618Ай бұрын
Hydrino creation can be explained also by creating electrons with slightly more mass first, since only heavier (than normal) electrons can have a stable orbits around a proton below ground state n=1.
@obiwanceleriАй бұрын
I remember reading that results could easily take more than a month to manifest but at the time the US government had given 30 days for experts to reproduce the results. One thing is certain, there was and still is billions to be lost if technologies such as LENR see the light of day.
@MadawaskaObservatoryАй бұрын
excellent video
@gerryjamesedwards1227Ай бұрын
I'm wondering if some of LENR behind the Ti particles that were produced by the Safire project. It should go a long way to explain the superabundance of heavy elements that we see in the universe.
@nadahereАй бұрын
Where is your evidence of Ti particles? Do you mean the *element* Titanium?
@4pharaohАй бұрын
Thought experiment: Make a bunch of spheres formed from Tightly coiled ridged wire with gaps between windings equal to the wire gauge. Throw them at each other and they will almost always bounce off each other. (Think standard fusion) However, with just the right alignment and spin the balls will easily mesh together ( think LENR) If Elemental particles are composed of many waves as QM /QFT insists then the probabilistic nature of all fusion is a result of matching orientations, and waves (quantum spin? Angular spins) between particles. Think high frequency magnetic music.
@dinf8940Ай бұрын
youre on the right track. there are many ways to accomplish (well, increase chances really) that, thus many forms of lenr, where hot fusion/fission is simply brute forcing the interaction. solid lattices introduce too many variables, anyone looking to crack that nut should focus on discharge plasma under nmr like conditions
@4pharaohАй бұрын
@ Even with “solid” lattices, I intuitively imagine there being dynamic subatomic movements necessary to maintain those lattice bonds, with “static” and “solid” being impossibilities in nature at those levels. If this indeed is the case, then those movement are likely to be periodic in nature, not random. ) again- intuitively imagining) Therefore breaking or bypassing those bonds, (which I assume, must be done as part of the Fusion/LENR process) would most effectively and likely require a matching ( complementary?) periodic waveforms. Food for thought: what do I know?
@FractalOmniverse5 күн бұрын
@4pharaoh definitely a nice hypothesis 😊
@Mezog001Ай бұрын
As a material scientist, if cracks and the list are the driver here then cold reduction a material to the point a breaking. Then rapidly heat the material for the needed temperature and run the reaction. The next phase would be to run the reaction with different heating rate. I would run an ANOVA to see if there are differences in the heating rate. I would also pull tensile samples on material before and after cold working and after running the experiment. This will allow for the judging of loss of mechanical strength and regain of elasticity after the experiment. It seems like people are not really consulting the material science crowd here as this is basic metallurgy.
@qwerty90615Ай бұрын
Materials science, including metallurgy, has been a focus of different labs. I could include a lot of links, but YT would cancel.
@christopherleubner6633Ай бұрын
Yes phase change can increase the rate of quantum tunneling by causing the charge field to line up the nuclei
@koenraad4618Ай бұрын
During the quantum tunneling of electrons (for instance Fowler Nordheim tunneling involved with the field emission of electrons from a solid surface to a gas/plasma environment), I assume electrons can become heavy (at least by an amount of 0.76 MeV/c^2) by up taking some Zero Point Energy. According to the Pilot wave theory, each particle is in constant interaction with superluminal Pilot waves that carry energy and very little momentum. Only during the ultra brief moment of quantum tunneling (which is a superluminal particle movement) an elementary particle is in non-equilibrium with its pilot wave energy background, meaning its potential energy can increase or decrease, for instance its mass energy (which is electric potential energy divided by c^2 according to electrodynamic mass theory). Pilot waves travel much faster than the speed of light, so the momentum of a quantum of pilot wave energy is much smaller than a photon with similar energy. It is for this reason that heavy electrons and newly created neutrons (via heavy electron capture) are slow (cold) and not fast (hot), thus can trigger LENR reactions. This explanation of LENR is logical: it requires a superluminal electron movement (quantum tunneling) to receive the energy of superluminal pilot wave radiation, AKA Zero Point Energy. This energy only changes the potential energy of the electron (its intrinsic mass, or its extrinsic potential energy), and not its kinetic energy. And Fowler Nordheim quantum tunneling almost always occurs in all these different LENR (or neutron creation) experiments. For example, Ken Shoulders' electron cluster is likely a cluster of heavy electrons, created at the moment of electron emission from a sharp high voltage cathode tip.
@terrellian1Ай бұрын
I don't remember if STP has done anything on panspermia, or even if it's within your scope, but what happened to the Cold fusion scientists seems to follow the same pattern as the work and experiences of Chandra Wickramasinghe, even though it's a different realm of physics. I'd be interested in your take on his ideas on panspermia and the steady state theory along with Fred Hoyle. If it's already been done a link would be awesome.
@WilliamLiousАй бұрын
I wonder whether structured atomic model can reflect upon this.
@16ChandElierАй бұрын
I am so appreciated, if you can provide me a PPT or PDF file of this valuable lecture and I promise to add a reference to your KZbin page for my students 🎉
@jesperandersson889Ай бұрын
the short-curcuit in fact has properties that mysterious as well (no kidding) but Saffire surely shows the way
@tetrabromobisphenolАй бұрын
8:40 The reaction almost certainly is more complex than suggested, and it may well involve activation through neutrinos and/or cosmic radiation. So these reactions may not be low energy at all, they may derive from rare (ultra) high energy interactions with condensed matter in certain configurations. Those possibilities do not seem to have been investigated yet.
@SuperRobinjames23 күн бұрын
Thanks
@MrHichammohsen1Ай бұрын
LENR also happens naturally in plants.
@BobWidlefishАй бұрын
Gareth: you missed Bob Greenyer’s relic neutrino plasmoid model. I think it has more explanatory power than any of the other ones.
@TheIgnoramusАй бұрын
I hope one day we understand Bob Greenyer, and Malcolm Bendal better. It’s time for a change. Plasmoid helical motion, and geometric negative entropy.
@doityourself3293Ай бұрын
LENR BATTERY --- You can take any alkaline battery that is still in the neutral state after it is made and is still not polarized as + and - and cause LENR 100% of the time. By hot starting it with a high speed electronic load and a high speed power supply. Hot starting a neutral battery causes LENR, you will see all kinds of new elements in the inside of that alkaline battery. What is a hot start-- it requires a power supply of about 1.5 V @ 40Amp and a high speed electronic load with a switching speed of about 4KHZ. Once the battery is zapped with hot start. 3 days later you will have new elements and a shorted battery full of dendrites with new elements in it. If you think i am kidding I can assure you I am not. Note: you can not buy batteries that have not been tested off the shelf and polarized. You can only get them direct from the manufacture that are still in there Neutral state from production. ( These are a special order). My guess would be the slow reaction time of the chemicals vs. The atomic physics of the elements in the batteries is what causes LENR. Most neutral batteries take around 150 ms to from a charge and produce current in a wire.
@GideonFerranteАй бұрын
I think that between the various alternative theories to the standard model you have the absolute truth. You all hold key pieces of the puzzle. Specifically electric universe, plasma cosmology, Ken Wheeler's toroidal dialectric plane/counter space/plane of inertia/ether... even some of the Geocentric theorists (I'm no longer going to mock "flat earthers" because they're at the very least basing their hypotheses on observations unlike the establishment). One of these geocentrists, Shane St.Pierre I believe, impressively debunked the theory of gravity (on a Livestream with a bunch of mainstreamers who were left speechless) and even developed a coherent equation based on kinematics, something that is concrete science hidden in plain sight that the mainstream go out of their way to ignore or never mention. I encourage anyone who has never heard of kinematics to look it up although it may be a fruitless task on YT.
@TheIgnoramusАй бұрын
If I understand you right…you’re talking about simply canceling out earths Velocity vector, its spin, solar system velocity, and direction in the Milky Way, you can great anti-gravity through simple Vector-canceling equation. Correct me if I’m wrong. This is where “vibrational “ coherence comes in at the macro scale, all our speed summed and countered.
@GideonFerranteАй бұрын
@TheIgnoramus I'll try pasting a link to the video but it's here in KZbin so if it doesn't work simply search for: "Flat Earther Explains Gravity In 2 Minutes".
@GideonFerranteАй бұрын
@TheIgnoramus I won't pretend to be the source of this information, nor am I well versed enough to perfectly explain it. I would share the video but YT won't allow it. Simply look up the one I mentioned, and the follow title:
@GideonFerranteАй бұрын
@TheIgnoramus *"Flat Earther Explains Gravity In 2 Minutes"*
@multi_misa72Ай бұрын
I can't remember have you made a video on SAFIRE project?
@nadahereАй бұрын
Yes, he made a vid about SAFIRE. Do a search on his channel
@martinwilliams9866Ай бұрын
Palladium electrode fusion combined with muon catalyst fusion is the way forward. Might Nucleonic tunneling be a thing?
@ogam5Ай бұрын
Also - might I request / recommend a segment ASAP inquiring about about the [more] SPECIFIC biological impacts of a rapidly-weakening terrestrial EMF - particularly as it relates to proprietary ecosystemic compromise and potential extinction, MOST of all by internalized (for at LEAST three decades) graphene & aluminum-compound nanoparticulates? Can provide my own EXTENSIVE insights, contingencies for response.....please reply to let me know - thanks!
@colterdenison6364Ай бұрын
Another related phenomena to look into is the formation of hydrinos.
@JakubVyoralАй бұрын
Check Pavel Werner's ring theory of nucleus. He has videos on his youtube channel and published some scuentifuc papers. It could explain observed behavior
@Tony-zi9qgАй бұрын
Electronuclear catalysis mediated by electromagnetic soliton quasiparticles.
@janap128Ай бұрын
You are on the right track. The quasiparticle is the electron quasiparticle. There are 70 types. The electron can combines with any number of various boson waveforms. This gives these various bosons the ability to acted like an electron but not actually be an electron (aka dressed boson)
@PalimpsestProdАй бұрын
isn't it more likely that something is affecting / interacting with the W force in ways we don't understand?
@onemanmob6756Ай бұрын
Is LENR behind of what happens in the 'thunderstorm generator'? Before watching this video I laughed at the cocept of that device, now I no longer am....
@DareToWonder15 күн бұрын
nuclear technology is wonderful
@TheShorterboyАй бұрын
"two prevailing beliefs" you missed the third which is money, if this worked as advertisaed it upends the whole planet economically
@ianp3112Ай бұрын
This is another SCAM like the Electric Universe. It's for people who can't, or won't, accept Reality! 😊
@trungtamienmayquocquang7233Ай бұрын
@@ianp3112 aim then scam is bbt kid
@ThienLuu-n3iАй бұрын
@@ianp3112no bbt scam kid😅😅
@michelKAZUSАй бұрын
Bonjour. Pourquoi ne pas faire les expériences avec des matériaux monoisotopiques du palladium [9 isotopes],cela pourrait peut-être simplifier les recherches. J'ai déjà réussi à séparer les quatre isotopes du plomb par voie chimique ; il suffit de trouver la bonne réaction chimique.
@Ta2dwitetrashАй бұрын
Money is the embodiment of energy. Free/cheap energey would crash every currency on the planet. And anyone hording money for power would lose everything. And thats every government and every elite. Youll never see it.
@drowningpenguin1588Ай бұрын
The amount of energy required to power AI will change this. Corporations are already buying Fission power Plants. If they can save a dollar, they will hunt down the opportunity. Not only power though, synthesis of elements will also enable them to produce raw material for manufacturing chips. The need for cheap power and cheap materials for AI development will supersede those concerns. It would alleviate the two greatest challenges that AI companies expect to see in their future. I’m not sold on AI, but I do know that if a company sees a chance for reducing their greatest limitation for growth they’ll pounce on the opportunity.
@r.connor9280Ай бұрын
Transmutation through transactions The ultimate power
@CeltokeeАй бұрын
Many have been killed for far less.
@TheBelrickАй бұрын
It is worse than this. We, our genus, is not meant to advance. We are literally being denied the stars
@findingthereal9052Ай бұрын
Embodiment is the wrong word, abstraction or symbol? There will always be a limiting factor to work and if free energy exists and is being suppressed this by necessity points to a secret global organization that can enforce the suppression, NHI?
@neoh524Ай бұрын
So now we can move on from this electron orbiting the nucleus model
@YS.Ай бұрын
👍
@phobosmoon4643Ай бұрын
Metal 'fuses' to metal when a plane touches a plane in the vacuum of space. am I an idiot or is that not at all related?
@TheIgnoramusАй бұрын
You are not an idiot. You are correct.
@Chris.DaviesАй бұрын
Vacuum Welding is what that's called.
@kayakMike1000Ай бұрын
Probably not related. Fusion is nuclear changes.
@maximvsdread1610Ай бұрын
Did a school of Red Herring just swim by?
@thethirdchimpanzeeАй бұрын
What about Muon-Catalyzed Fusion!?
@DudeManDude-ot5fvАй бұрын
What if they are like glitches in how things work?
@GlacialScionАй бұрын
"Low Energy" = Cold "Nuclear Reaction" = Fusion For anyone curious about validity of the topic.
@cokemachine5510Ай бұрын
I have a feeling Tesla will come up! 2:36
@critical-thoughtАй бұрын
And still, we know so little.
@christopherleubner6633Ай бұрын
It is real but it isnt ever going to be a real power source. It is caused by a quantum mechanical effect known as "tunneling". Without going into too much its a way to circumvent a high energy barrier allowing a state change or reaction to occur. In this case the elections from deuterium can fill shell vacancies particularly the 4D 9 and 10 transitions of palladium, but any metal that needs 2 extra electrons to complete the shells will do. When this occurs it creates a metallic alloy dilution of the charge field. This makes tunneling more likely. ❤
@TheIgnoramusАй бұрын
I believe that’s only one step of many.
@shockwave326Ай бұрын
LENR is how SAFIRE is working
@janap128Ай бұрын
Did you consider that SAFIRE is a plasma system that has a temperature above 300,000K. Yes, many current LENR systems are now plasma based. So how does all this old theory apply to the plasma based LENR systems?
@shockwave326Ай бұрын
@@janap128 how is safire old ??? and safire ran on 20 watts of power thats LENR and low energy u goof !!! temps of 300,000 are u high ? the highest temps in safire were 80,000 f ,,,, stop spreading lies
@janap128Ай бұрын
@@shockwave326 by old theory, I mean fusion caused by penetrations' of the coulomb barrier (aka cold fusion). Also, SAFIRE measured a voltage drop of 30 volts inside the double layers. Inside a plasma, a volt is equal to 11,000°C per volt of plasma temperature. That voltage measurement is where the 300,000K double layer plasma temperature estimate comes from. I am sorry that my first reply was misinterpreted. I meant to mean that the cold fusion theory cannot explain LENR inside a hot plasma. Is that clear now?
@shockwave326Ай бұрын
@@janap128 i have followed safire since it started and no one has quoted temps of 300,000 as i said 80,000 degrees is the number that was given as the temp being contained inside the double layer that the probe then entered and the probe then was destroyed
@stephenanderle542225 күн бұрын
Not in heaven or on earth! Not enough heat or more important pressure.
@richardburfoot461Ай бұрын
‘Possible’ nuclear reactions - not ‘potential’. 4:19
@EnergyTREАй бұрын
LENR occurs due to coherent field interactions and resonances within the Æther, facilitated by geometric and energetic alignments.
@exponentialnegative1Ай бұрын
You would appreciate this channels playlist on Aether!
@EnergyTREАй бұрын
@@exponentialnegative1 yes for some reason they assume it's a particle 🤣
@nadahereАй бұрын
@@EnergyTRE What ever Aether is, that mystery is unclear to us
@EnergyTREАй бұрын
@nadahere 😆 no it's not.... many great mind had a very sound understanding of the Æther. Many accurate models exist. You're just not accepting their work for some reason. Materialist and atomism aren't correct. Einstein was a crossdressing spy thief not a pioneer. He was an incredibly racist. Even Edison was antisemitic and Christian 😂 like that makes sense. Are you taught that in government schools.... No you're not. Modern science is dead. They can't come up with anymore fairytale or fantasy land ideas. The cult of bumping particles is coming to an end. Electricity is a byproduct not the main event
@EnergyTREАй бұрын
@@nadahere only you not everyone
@peterlang777Ай бұрын
NASA Vladimir pines patent from Glenn research in Ohio. 2017 . lattice fusion with deuterium and erbium
@johnlord8337Ай бұрын
The stellar engine within the Electrostatic (ES) and Electrogravitic (EG) Model is self-explanatory. - The Aether has 3 energy level space fabrics and 3 string (loop) theory - The Matter has 3 energy level space fabrics and 3 string (loop) theory The stellar engine is a supercompacted supersolid star core of gravitons - The stellar engine's photosphere is a supercompacted region of Aether space fabric COLD FUSING (NON-NUCLEAR) of Hydrogen to Iron - The photosphere uses the 3 energy level Aether space time fabrics of 3 strings (and loop) theory graviton-tensor-graviton-tensor-graviton ... - Aether Gravitons, Electrino gravitons, and Small electron gravitons are positron-positron pairings producing gravitational force - Aether Graviton tensors, Electrino tensors, and Small electron tensors are electron-positron pairings having dual electrical force and gravitational force - The Aether space fabric strings within the stellar engine's star core massive gravitational force of the photosphere converts these multiple 3 positrons into their respective energy level supra gravitons producing pressure, ... and the multiple electrons into their respective energy level supra electrons producing ionization - These supra gravitons and supra electrons are the actual active fusion agents within the stellar engine photosphere, fusing Hydrogen up to Iron - The normal deep space Aether space fabric has sub-quantum entanglement and is in a cosmic steady state tension, with the tensors having dual gravitational force holding the other gravitons together (preventing cosmic expansion), and the electrical force pushes away the gravitons (preventing cosmic collapse) - Aether space fabric operates within wave physics and QM QED - The stellar engine photosphere has emissions of radio eaves, microwaves, and infrared - The Lord (radio waves, microwaves), Humphrey (infrared), and Pfund (infrared) electron transition series operate within the Aether realm - ****** This, by mechanical definition, is Cold Fusion, as a non-nuclear Hot Fusion radioactive (Uranium series et al) mechanism - The stellar engine's chromosphere is a supercompacted region of Matter space fabric COLD FUSING (NON-NUCLEAR) of Cobalt up to Element 91 non-radioactive Protactinium - **** and only higher nuclear radioactive HOT FUSING happens with Uranium up to Element 118 - The chromosphere uses the 3 energy level Matter space time fabrics of 3 strings (and loop) theory graviton-tensor-graviton-tensor-graviton .... - Matter electron gravitons, Muon electron gravitons, and Tau electron gravitons are positron-positron pairings producing gravitational force - Matter electron tensors, Muon electron tensors, and Tau electron tensors are electron-positron pairings having dual electrical force and gravitational force - The Matter space fabric strings with the stellar engine's star core massive gravitational force of the chromosphere converts these multiple 3 positrons into their respective energy level supra gravitons producing pressure, ... and the multiple electrons into their respective energy level supra electrons producing ionization - These supra gravitons and supra electrons are the actual active fusion agents within the stellar engine chromosphere, fusing Cobalt up to Element 91 Protactinium, ... and then into the higher nuclear fusion of Uranium up to Element 118 The normal deep space Matter space fabric has quantum entanglement and is in a cosmic steady state tension, with the tensors having dual gravitational force holding the other gravitons together (preventing cosmic expansion), and the electrical force pushes away the gravitons (preventing cosmic collapse) - Matter space fabric operates within light/particle physics and QM QCD - The stellar engine chromosphere has emissions of visible light, UV rays, [x rays], gamma rays - The Paschen (visible light), Balmer (UV rays, [x rays]), and Lyman ([x rays], gamma rays) electron transition series operate within the Matter realm - ***** This, by mechanical definition, is Cold Fusion of non-nuclear elements, ... and Hot Fusion radioactive (Uranium series et al) mechanism Here is the real truths of the Sun's stellar engine and processes. It is the same for the (wrongly worded) Black Hole, which is not a black HOLE, not portal, nor wormhole to multiple dimensions. A black body is the naked remains of a former (super)nova star explosion's star core or star core fragment. The black body is reattempting electrogravitic accretion of its surrounding space debris in evolving back its photosphere, and eventual chromosphere. The event horizon is the photosphere--chromosphere boundary. There is no spaghettification effect, and no light capture, other than the Aether variable light speed photinos which remain captured (and still glowing) in the photosphere. The event horizon is the corollary of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, where the photosphere's electron transition series of radio waves, microwaves, and infrared are emitted. A black body is also conducting Cold Fusion within its evolving photosphere.
@thebeautifulones5436Ай бұрын
Yeah!
@ogam5Ай бұрын
.....Gareth, don't know whether you've seen this RELATED installment from 'Dark Journalist' yet, but - do believe that Farrell's conclusions are LARGELY correct.....kzbin.info/www/bejne/mGOcZWmipbGoeK8
@someguy78216 күн бұрын
But then they couldn't use "muh climate" to restrict movement and lower standards of living.
@FractalOmniverse5 күн бұрын
Comment boost
@vladnurk4710Ай бұрын
Looking for new converts Cold Fusion dream keeps on being resurrected every few yrs and it has been debunked as a hoax every time
@barrydysert2974Ай бұрын
🙏💜⚡
@raycar1165Ай бұрын
Terra 🌞 Pax 🌏🌎🌍☯️⚡️ Much ❤ Love
@XXfeaАй бұрын
Watch out Joe Rogan!!
@tinymetaltreesАй бұрын
Headline: Physicists Conceal Discovery Of Dark Fusion With Cryptic Acronym: LENR 🤨
@photojinndjinnАй бұрын
We are rediscovering what in antiquity was called alchemy. Not fairytale magic equations but a real understanding of and the ways to control, manipulate, and shape matter. Think petrification, fully transmuted from organics into jeweled agate at the molecular level. Vitrification of rock. Also.. electroplating is tangentially related me thinks... Anyways just my random thoughts on this. 🪐