Les Feldick - Is Paul Our Apostle?

Support this channel: lesfeldick.net/donate
"Through The Bible with Les Feldick"
If you would like to order books or DVDs or to donate to Les Feldick Ministries, you may do so at the Official site: LesFeldick.com
For our video study compilation website, visit LesFeldick.net #LesFeldick #BibleStudy #Live

[@daniellecauley3883]

AMEN

[@savannahhernandez3467]

AMEN, AMEN, AND AMEN AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊

[@Onelove858]

Great Truth Teaching! ❤

[@savannahhernandez3467]

AMEN TO THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊

[@oralialandreth6136]

Rejoice and pray 🙏🙏🙏!!!!

[@savannahhernandez3467]

AMEN TO THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊

[@tammyhicks1460]

God has in these last days spoken to us by His Son..-Hebrews 1:2

[@lima1877]

You said, they were in the body of Christ but didn’t realize it yet. Hmmm As per your theology, one can be saved without realizing it yet. Hmm

[@DerrickthePinecone]

Les, I agree that Paul is our minister today, and that is a fact. 1st Corinthians 15:1-4 tells us how we must be saved today as Gentiles (and Jews can be saved, as well, in this Age of Grace, but they must come through Paul's Gospel), but I want to point out something that I think that you are wrong about, and in fact, there are THREE particular issues that I've discovered where you're in error. I will list them below: 1) You say that the 'Body of Christ' started with the Apostle Paul, but this is clearly erroneous. I noticed that in many of your teachings, you generally skip over Romans 16, and you skim through it, and you overlook verses that refute the idea that the Body of Christ "started with Paul." Take a look at Romans 16: 7. Paul says in his own words that there were people "IN CHRIST" before (BEFORE) him! Romans 16, verse 7 says: "Salute Adronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me." Notice: "who also were IN CHRIST BEFORE ME." There were individuals that were already 'in Christ' BEFORE Paul, so that refutes the idea that the Body of Christ "started" with Paul. That would be impossible! No: the Body of CHRIST (Christ's Body) started with CHRIST. People that were saved AFTER Jesus died were STILL in the Body of Christ (they were a part of the Church), but the only difference is that they didn't realize it yet, because it hadn't yet been revealed to Paul. It's very clear from Romans 16:7 that this is the case, because if not, how do you reconcile the fact that Paul says in his own words that there were people IN CHRIST "before" him? 2) You say that there are TWO GOSPELS: that Peter preached one gospel, and Paul preached another gospel, and that both Peter and Paul were preaching two DIFFERENT gospels. This is Bullingerism. That is, this particular doctrine (which is erroneous) was started by E.W. Bullinger. However, when you read Acts chapter 15, you discover that Peter and the others AGREE with Paul! Acts chapter 15, verse 11, look carefully at what Peter says in his own words there. Paul WENT BACK and told the other disciples the MYSTERY (revelation) that he had received from Jesus Christ, Himself, and when Paul went back and told them at the Council of Jerusalem, they all agreed that this was correct, and so they began preaching what Paul had revealed to them. It's a major ERROR to say that Peter was preaching something different than Paul, because look at what Peter preached himself--look at 1st Peter 1:18,19. Peter says the following: "Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers: verse 19 (key passage!): "But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:" Peter here is PREACHING THE BLOOD! This is clearly PAULINE! How else would Peter know to preach on the Blood? This is precisely what PAUL preaches time and time and time again--all throughout Romans and elsewhere, he preached on the BLOOD Atonement of Jesus Christ, and here in 1st Peter, Peter says the same thing. It's Pauline. How does one reconcile this? They weren't teaching two gospels; no, they AGREED that this is correct; the disciples and Peter were like, "Ah-ha! Okay, you're right. We will go to our spheres of activity and preach that, because that is CORRECT!" ... and Acts 15:11, OUT OF PETER'S OWN MOUTH, look carefully what he says in that verse. "BELIEVE". 3) The final thing that I disagree with you on is that you say that the Church began at the END of the Book of Acts, but this is clearly erroneous. How could that be the case when people were getting saved all throughout the Book of Acts? The Church began AFTER Christ died; there are 7 DIFFERENT WAYS that people received the Holy Spirit after Christ died. Not all of them were the same way. The Body of Christ wasn't revealed until Christ revealed it to Paul, yes this is true, but the people that were saved right AFTER Christ's died, etc., they were still in the Body of Christ, because it says that Jews AND Gentiles are 'of one body', and that Body is Christ's Body. You can't just say that those that believed weren't in the Body of Christ, because if that's the case, what else would they be connected to? It doesn't jive. Anyway, those are the three things I disagree with you on, and I believe you can prove in the Bible ALL THINGS that are erroneous and false, because the Holy Spirit recognized all false doctrine that was to come, and so all of the answers to refute claims can be found in the Bible. I love you, and I know you've helped a lot of people, but I think we should be precise and root out false teachings and error. Bullinger is clearly what you agree with, and that's fine, but I just want you to realize that it is FALSE. Many Blessings to you, in the Name of Yeshua!

[@nileslivingstonsr3930]

...P.S. ...Has Les Feldick, TBN, DAYSTAR, LESEA, EWTN, BET, CBN, and "the many" other "Christian T.V." Networks NEVER READ ( believed, or obeyed ): ...Deu. 4:14-28; Ex. 20:4; Num. 33:52; Isa. 44:10-13; Psalm 135:15-18; ...Acts 17:29-30; Rom. 1:18-32, v.23; Rev. 9:20-21; 21:8; 22:18-19?? ...The simple is Les Feldick, and ALL the rest of THE WORKERS OF INIQUITY are BLINDED by the god of THIS WORLD ( II Cor. 4:6; Matt. 15:7-14; John 14:23-24; Matt. 7:13-15, 21-23, 26-27; Isa. 56:9-12; Jer. 23:1-40; Isa. 10:1-23; 30:1-3; II Cor. 11:3-4, 13-15; Titus 1:6-16; 3:10-11; Zech. 5:1-11; Rom. 16:17-18; Phil. 3:2, 18-19; I Tim. 6:3-10; Matt. 6:19-24; ...II Tim. 2:23-26; James 5:19-20; ...Eze. 2:1-3:27; 13:1-23; Rev. 17:1-18:24; Isa. 2:6-22; II Peter 2:1-22!! ...NOW, ..."the ball is in your court." ...REPENT, or else!! ( Rev. 2:1-3:19 ). ...You ALL didn't believe the apostle Paul, when he said that the LOVE of MONEY is the root of ALL evil ( I Tim. 6:3-10; II Thess. 2:1-12; Rev. 13:1-18; Luke 18:18-25; Eph. 4:28-30; 5:1-17; Prov. 28:4-5; 14:7; 29:12 ...apparently, you don't know, nor care what the word ALL means!! ...Amen.

[@redhed9776]

Wow.....ummm.....no

[@johnmorgan7947]

When words are MANY .....😢

[@13kimosabi13]

Sadly, you don’t Rightly Divide God’s Word as we are told to do in => 2 Tim 2:15 kjv. When your teacher told everyone to sit down….did you think she meant your Dad at work or Mom at home should sit down ? It’s about CONTEXT => and you simply can’t do it properly. Your Bible wasn’t written in English and the words used in your translation, weren’t always the best choice nor do they always convey the correct meaning. You need a Vines and a Strongs concordance. Bottom line…..it’s Ok that you are so messed up…..because Jesus did everything necessary that a sinful human like you could not.