Liar Lies About Evolution

[@ROFT]

Every "debunk" of evolution: I don't know anything about evolution but I read some lies and I'm going to repeat them. Also nuh uh.

[@naruarthur]

"i studied evolution only by the guys that fight against it"

[@user-vm3dd4yd2l]

Literally bro, they never studied evolution ever or biology

[@jacksonbrown1830]

be sure to pretend that no progress has been made since darwin first thought about it

[@rayfighter]

​@@naruarthurthat grand takedown in the end is exactly and only thing these superstitious condoms lying through their teeth should always get.

[@uzumakikiq]

The "I win, I destroyed evolution" crack me the hell up 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@BaronVonQuiply]

About 3 hours ago a Matt Walsh clone couldn't werdz gud and declared to me that he "destroyed the leftist ideology" because he doesn't understand women

[@queuecee]

I've heard a theist claim that he "debunked" evolution FIFTY years ago! And THAT is why there has been NO research in evolution since that time... right? Not a single research paper on evolution during the last fifty years???

[@seraphinaaizen6278]

The most laughable thing about their "observational science" script is that evolution has in fact been observed and documented at every level, up to and including speciation.

[@robertcarsten4050]

You forget creationists have debunked that fact with their argument "nuh-uh" The nerve of this dummy to accuse Peterson of the same concept he has built is entire personality on is irksome

[@cliveadams7629]

Yeah, but they never saw a banana turn into an ape, so evolution is bust!

[@TaxEvasi0n]

Can you show me the empirical evidence of a land mammal evolving in to a whale? Don't bother if all you have is abductive reasoning and extrapolation. I'm not looking for taxonomical similarities and categorisations - I don't care for equivocation arguments. I want to see genuine real time change on the biggest scale. I accept speciation through evolution, and I can see the plausibility as far as genera. But beyond that, it is incredibly doubtful and is only held together through taxonomical similarities. This is a genuine reply. I am someone who is new to evolution and I want to learn the facts honestly and earnestly. If you have an organisms name I can research, I am happy to do so.

[@Ugly_German_Truths]

@@TaxEvasi0n Why would it be necessary to show more than the genetic and fossil evidence for whale evolution? Is it puishing the goal post day again in Science Denial Land???

[@seraphinaaizen6278]

@@TaxEvasi0n "Can you show me the empirical evidence of a land mammal evolving in to a whale?" Yes. We literally have fossil evidence of their ancestors, and we know how long ago whales diverged from their common ancestor with the hippopotamus through genetic comparison. "I want to see genuine real time change on the biggest scale." Ah, so like all creations, you don't actually care about evidence. You don't know what evidence even is. Heck, you are so dishonest and uneducated on this subject, that if evidence was presented to you a) you'd just deny it and b) you wouldn't recognize it anyway. This is the problem with creationists: You think evolution works the way it does in pokemon. "But beyond that, it is incredibly doubtful and is only held together through taxonomical similarities." No, it isn't. And if you think that, then you don't know anything about the subject. Which, wouldn't be surprising, because creationists never demonstrate even a kindergarten level education on evolution (and, often, science in general). "This is a genuine reply." No, it isn't. You are not an honest actor and don't pretend to be. You are a creationist shill attempting to waste people's time and effort by putting forward bad faith arguments to try and promote your slavish devotion to bronze age folklore at the expense of reality. You are a waste of skin. If life was an exam, you would get a failing grade. You are an offence to the human race by continuing to use up oxygen better spent on other people. You are making the entire human race less intelligent because of your religious agenda. NOTHING I could say or present to you will convince you that evolution is true, because if you actually cared about reality, you would not be a creationist. You would not be leaving troll comments on a youtube video if you were genuinely interested in research. This information is not hidden. It would be very easy to find if you actually cared. But you don't. And we both know you don't.

[@drg8687]

His concept of observational science is a moving target. Our lifetimes will be over in a hundred years, and then all of that observational science becomes historical science.

[@michaelmay5453]

That is not how any of this works though. If something was true a hundred years ago it's still true (and testable) today. "observational science" isn't a thing. You formulate the test and then it can be repeated forever with the same results, this is called peer review.

[@drg8687]

@@michaelmay5453 I know and agree. I was providing an obvious defeater to his statement.

[@cerealdude890]

The guy is a loon, but that’s a mischaracterization of his argument. He would call that observational science that happened in the past, not historical science.

[@drg8687]

@@cerealdude890 no, he said a human life time.

[@michaelmay5453]

@@cerealdude890 Neither observational science or historical science are terms that anyone actually use in reality.

[@danielessex2162]

Gotta love when someone wants a debate and then reaponds with "I'm not here to answering questions" after answering questions previously

[@martin2289]

Baffling how creationists like this spectacular example of the Dunning-Kruger effect seem to think that nobody's ever heard their ridiculous bullshit arguments get completely wrecked countless times over already.

[@helmedon]

Beneficial mutations include things like 1. Lactose tolerance 2. Rich color vision 3. A resistance to HIV 4. Having two different colored eyes (heterochromia) 5. Skin color 6. Hair color 7. Antibiotic resistant bacteria Flavobacterium K172: a point insertion mutation (a single thymidine inserted at at position 98 of allele nyl B) created a new open reading frame which expressed a novel peptide with a unique enzymatic activity: it was capabale of metabolizing nylon oligomers. This occurred in a pond near a textile factory in Japan that was heavily contaminated with nylon waste, and the newly evolved ability to “eat nylon” conferred a significant increase in fitness such that rapidly the nylon-eating bacteria became the predominant strain in the pond. Beneficial mutations can confer an advantage to the organism possessing them and, over time, these mutations can spread throughout a population.

[@BaronVonQuiply]

# 4 reminds me, if you looked at various pictures of me from a child to now, you'd see my eyes are two different colors. Just not at the same time.

[@foolishlyludicrous]

Would that be classified as a frame shift mutation?

[@SuperChickenBurgers]

what benefit does #4 have?

[@OceanusHelios]

@@SuperChickenBurgers It attracts the opposite sex. ;)

[@catpoke9557]

@@SuperChickenBurgers You get to look cool

[@MrPalp]

I have 500 PHD´s! I got them by studying how the replace function in photoshop works! It was a hard thing to master.

[@martinconnelly1473]

You do know just counting the number of times a P, a H and a D occur in a book does not give you that number of PHDs 😜

[@foulrot]

Did he claim that Alexi Kondrashiv came up with the idea of evolution? That's pretty wild considering Kondrashov was born in 1957

[@celiand2618]

Dr Alexei Kondratyev. Currently works on neurodegenerative diseases... A job that would not even exist if evolution was not true and the theory accurate as part of his work is on the ones we can keep alive thanks to the progress of medecine when natural selection would have taken out the bearers... The caller misunderstood Kondratyev's work to a point... Deserving of gulag.

[@jasonibbs]

​@celiand2618 Kondrashov. But he still isnt any closer for that as the seems to be referencing creationist sites that are cherry picking a quote about genetic degradation that doesnt even talk about entropy.

[@celiand2618]

@@jasonibbs thanks I checked Kondrashov and yeah does not ring with what this personn did either... Kondrashov seems to postulate that through sexual reproduction even slightly detrimental mutations will be reduced.

[@jaredmitchell1302]

"I have 160 PHDs"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@michaelmay5453]

I'd believe half of that number if it was IQ points.

[@madara211000]

167 to be exact!

[@uncleanunicorn4571]

Then he would know Aleksei Jerkmeoff has to submit his findings for peer-review to be worth serious consideration.

[@uncleanunicorn4571]

@@michaelmay5453 Stealing this comment

[@crimm2465]

Is he trolling? Or did that guy have some kind of psychological issues?

[@lubrew5862]

It’s always funny to listen to someone read off their script and get confused when they ask an answer and the person doesn’t give them the answer that’s in their script. I was waiting for this guy to just state but that isn’t in my script. I have heard this same script at least a dozen times. Running off at the end because Peterson wouldn’t follow his script was just so telling.

[@geraldpeevy4827]

It is like listening to a darth dawkins debate a decently proficient debater. Scripts are a terrible debate tactic.

[@lubrew5862]

@@geraldpeevy4827 It’s even sadder that this exact script is not original to him. I have heard it at least a dozen times starting years ago. So we know he is not original as well as not smart enough to have a conversation without a script

[@madara211000]

@@lubrew5862 Darth get his nonsense from Matt Slick who does an even worse job at the presupp script.

[@lubrew5862]

@@madara211000 I have never been able to listen to Darth Dawkins. Most pressups I just find their arguments comical but he is just such a horrible person. I get that he is trying to compensate for issues in his real life but still, he is way over the top and not worth my time.

[@madara211000]

@@lubrew5862 Consider that his wife and kids left and disowned him, he was living in his mom's basement until his mom (RIP) died and his brother kicked him out, and that he is living with his caretaker who refused to allow him to do his online yelling in the house so he is forced to do it from his car; which is why he was on TikTok for a while.

[@oxcart4172]

This bloke's channel is going places. Very well done!

[@Nubifier]

"Kondrashov argues that because of the slightly deleterious effect of mutations the population will tend to be composed of individuals with a small number of mutations. Because of the recombination effect of the sex on the genotypes the individuals with fewer and more deleterious mutations will be created. Since there is a major selective disadvantage to individuals with more mutations, these individuals die out." It's almost like this caller was trying to lie about Alexey, because they certainly wouldn't have agreed.

[@queuecee]

The person the guy was referring to is Alexey Kondrashov. It's probably in regard to his August 2012 article in Nature that talks about how older fathers seem to transmit more mutations than younger fathers. He's probably extrapolating that to claim genetic "entropy".

[@kaleelgeoff3902]

Yeah I was trying to find him with genetic entropy in the search and there is nothing. Had to find him by name alone.

[@tylerwest719]

It’s pronounced Alex Jerkmeoff

[@djhalling]

@@tylerwest719 No need to insult Kondrashov. He appears (as far as I can tell) to be a legitimate scientist who has just been misrepresented by the caller.

[@tylerwest719]

@@djhalling I’m not trying to insult Kondrashov. I’m poking fun at Planet Peterson’s comment during the debate.

[@queuecee]

He claims that he knows there was time prior to humans. How does he know, since he claims he can't know anything prior to his lifetime?

[@martin2289]

Interesting quote from an Amazon review of Kondrashov's book "Crumbling Genome: The Impact of Deleterious Mutations on Humans," which states that the author "does not in any way support the YEC concepts of Sanford nor offers any evidence against any modern understanding about the theory of evolution."

[@ROFT]

Observation in science doesn't mean watch. It means to measure using your senses or instruments. You can observe changes in the fossil record. You can observe things in the past in molecular biology. Observational science is basically all science, because all science involves using observations. It's nothing but word games of equivocation.

[@robertcarsten4050]

You have just triggered all the liars at answers in Genesis. They are seething now, I hope you're happy

[@ROFT]

@@robertcarsten4050 🙂

[@OceanusHelios]

It also means recording...collecting data. Taking sharp detailed notes. This is something everybody instinctively knows about science.

[@WetDoggo]

he's a professor of "evolutionary science"? 😂😂 I'm a pope-imam of religion stuff then... and i say god is made up, so there you go

[@BaronVonQuiply]

I'm watching this video in the past. **Ken Ham AIG nervousness intensifies**

[@joeldobbs7396]

Hahaha ha, when he calls himself a professor of evolutionary biology I damn near cried. I have had an interest in a lot of different subjects over the years, but I would never try to impersonate a professional. I usually see that kind of thing from people when they are loaded off their ass, " no no, I am a perfeshher, you dunno what yer talking about, I won a noble prize of first place and yer justa nobuddy ". Never heard someone who wasn't drunk or crazy try to pull something that ridiculous.

[@aaronlietz]

The main problem is that these folks are doing "apologetics", starting with their conclusion and working backwards toward confirmation, which is a dishonest method of seeking truth. It says "I already know the truth and now I'm going to pretend that I'm seeking the truth." So they are effectively LYING. They are not seeking truth. They are playing the "defend, defend, defend what I already assumed to be true" game.

[@drklnk23]

You just got yourself a subscriber. The fact that he doesn't understand mutation and you held his feet to the fire. Chef's kiss 😂.

[@TaxEvasi0n]

As a Creationist myself looking for genuine information about evolution, including arguments, it is of no help when the adversary to evolution doesn't even believe in dinosaurs. I'm out. Can't learn anything when one side has absolutely no sense to argue from.

[@Nanology101]

"You're talking nonsense" "Dinosaurs never existed" lol

[@ianchisholm5756]

Riz smugly repeating what the clever boys told him at the mosque.

[@sfamerken12]

Nothing clever has ever been said at a mosque. At least nothing related to the reality of biological science.

[@SonuSingh-sn8qg]

This guy is a flat earther too.

[@queuecee]

For the kind of confidence he has in his misinformation, he almost has to be a flat earther.

[@reluctantheist5224]

I recognise the voice, who is it ?

[@nicksykes4575]

I wonder what his sky daddy would say about him lying his ass off, and making himself a laughing stock!

[@alexritchie4586]

The Dawah Movement says that Allah states it is good and correct to lie to the kafir in order to convert them.

[@stednitza]

​@@alexritchie4586 That's actually fucked

[@alexritchie4586]

@@stednitza So it is, but it also makes them lazy and foolish as they put most of their efforts into flattering or convincing sounding lies and not actual arguments or apologia.

[@puffy10]

Alexander Jerk-me-off killed me😂😂😂

[@Virtualblueart]

It's funny that the Expanded Star Wars universe had a species that only trusted touch to verify if something was real because all other senses were essentially looking at the past.

[@corringhamdepot4434]

If I define car mechanics out of existence then I can assert that all cars will never break down, because if any did, then no cars would ever work. 🤔

[@drdave8607]

That inbreeding argument was just mint. Instant Rage-Gauge into the red.

[@TwoForFlinchin1]

So if this guy found a tree in the woods and wasn't around to see the tree get planted from seed he would then think a viable explanation is that aliens created it with a life scanner? You can't make a future prediction on whether the tree was planted from a seed. If this guy calls back you should ask him about the watchmaker argument since that's an argument based in historical observation.

[@Kulascus]

"I don't want you put you in a Got You moment" in the strong brittish accent is the foulest way to say "this isn't a gotch ya" 😂

[@alexritchie4586]

We can watch bacteria populations mutate over the span of a human long weekend, never mind a human lifetime.

[@Basiclemon54]

10:59 you can see the exact moment on his face where he gets just as confused as me as to what he's yapping about and it's hilarious

[@rossk4864]

At about 21:50, the interviewee attributes Alexey Kondrashov as "the beginner" and "pioneer" of evolution, an absurd statement given that Kondrashov was born in 1957. Having 167 phd's means that each doctoral submission is candidate's name and subject on a post card with $15 attached!

[@Virtualblueart]

Mail order diplomas, gotta collect them all.😂

[@martinconnelly1473]

One genuine PHD takes maybe 3 or 4 years, 167 PHDs he can Foxtrot Oscar.

[@joethompson132]

“Therefore I win” wow no understanding of debate either. Maddening

[@nicholasbanton]

That was schadenfreude-licious!

[@corringhamdepot4434]

"It is, it is, it is ..............................." What a complete Richard. When Peterson spends 90% of the time presenting evidence, and Dick Brain spends 10% of the time making unsupported assertions. "You are wrong, you are wrong, Peterson".

[@northernbrother1258]

The geologic column is observable today.

[@OceanusHelios]

Stratigraphic layers is the correct scientific term. If you google geologic column you end up with a bunch of anti-evolutonist bunko stuff. They change terms slightly and make them more popular to wiggle into the debate. They want people to pretend it is found in only one spot and is just a single instance and none of these worldwide layers have any connection or relation to one another. They also want people to pretend the earth is a plane and not a sphere. Be careful to not fall for their terms and the usage of their terms.

[@Astralmess]

I refuse to believe some people are wilfully so ignorant. it physically hurts to hear debates like this. subscribed lol.

[@DigitalinDaniel]

'There were beings that existed before humans that had lifespans of 5000 years." ...Sponges? We just call them sponges. xD

[@MileHighInTheSky]

All those PHDs, and this guest doesn’t understand that there is no such thing as a “mute point”. It’s called a “moot point”. 😂😂

[@robertcarsten4050]

No no the mute point is the temperature that objects lose their ability to make noise. I would think the guests mute point is roughly 1400 c°

[@marcsman07]

JEEEZ that caller was very dishonest.

[@glitterlok]

167 PhDs! Incredible.

[@mojomusica]

Caller need a new script, that one is old and useless, just like the caller. Do they ever listen to what they say and what is said to them? I get the impression that he was just going to ramble through his script, no matter what replies he got, or how wrong he was proved to be.

[@madara211000]

As soon as he said "genetic entropy", I realized the guest was lost

[@professorsad4090]

It took you that long to realise?

[@madara211000]

@@professorsad4090 Not that long, sometimes they come around. This guy, he jumped head first into a well.

[@professorsad4090]

@@madara211000 yeah, this guy also switched between flat and globe earth, pretty sure he just does it for the attention, or he’s truly just a moron.

[@ksbrst2010]

​@@madara211000Well so we know he must either be a very fast dinger (and heat resistant) or he qualifies for a Darwin Award.

[@foolishlyludicrous]

"Do you agree that evolution requires an increase in genetic information? " "No. " "So where would that increase in information come from? " "..."

[@Jashtvorak]

Creationists can use micro and macro evolution only after they show a mechanism that stops changes in organisms.

[@HisZotness]

“Ok” = I’m ignoring what you just said.

[@user-vm3dd4yd2l]

😂😂😂😂

[@inutamer3658]

You don't even have to make them distinguish an arbitrary length of time for observation. You cannot observe something until after it happens that's logically sound, because the alternative is before it happens

[@Bunny99s]

"No matter how many small steps you take you never get this huge step"? So when you take a shovel and move only one shovel of dirt every hour, so a small step, you can never clear out the area you need for your house? What kind of logic is that? I don't understand how these people can't get that small changes simply accumulate over time and when looking at samples a long time apart they look quite different. That's essentially how ANYTHING works. It's like claiming that a liter of water in an open glass can never evaporate. Yes small bits evaporate but never the whole glass... Well, how about waiting for "a bit" longer? Come back after a few years and I guarantee that the water is gone. Small steps accumulate over time, that's true for almost everything.

[@z08840]

when they ask to demonstrate "new genetic information" - tell them to sequence their genome against their parents' genome

[@exhumus]

You ruled him out as a person with engaging with at the attempt of an "observational vs historical" science argument. It's a distinction only creationists make.

[@cwack12]

Oh man. Riz is such a troll

[@QuranOnlyFans]

Riz?

[@WhoThisMonkey]

14:25 "this is factual information I am giving you here!" The way this is said makes me wonder if he's aware other 'information' he puts out is not factual.

[@OceanusHelios]

12:10 "I want to debate Evoluion: That is the first mistake. Disprove evolution. Go thorugh all the experiments that support evolution, ALL of them. Go through all of the observations. ALL of them. Read all of them. Disprove it if you can. It's like saying "I want to debate gravity." Well, don't just debate gravity...jump up into the air and see if you get stuck. See you when you come down to earth and have your feet on the ground again.

[@brentjones804]

I respect that Peterson doesn't use kid gloves in these debates. These guys are a*-hole$ to science and knowledge.

[@user-vm3dd4yd2l]

I love how he tries to say no no no, but can you see Atoms no do they exist? Yes😂😂😂

[@Halfendymion]

I'm betting this guy wasn't around to observe humans being placed on the Earth, which would make it historical science

[@dark_fire_ice]

By what mechanism makes a past event invalid?

[@rylanasher4756]

" I dont even belive dinosaurs existed!" he shouted this as if it was a "duh" revelation. Way to deligitamise and disintegrate any opinion on any scientific fact you might ever have. This guy really thinks he has a point? He thinks he has actual knowledge, and that we should take him seriously, after saying something like that? Stay away from the internet buddy, you aren't doing yourself any favours.

[@jacksonbrown1830]

I don't know what rizz said, but the chat is dunking on him so hard

[@vonwux]

Can you actually be a 'professor of evolutionary biology' if you don't believe in evolution to start with? Isn't that a bit like me claiming to be the Dean of the Santa Claus physics department while refusing to acknowledge Christmas? It's an awful analogy but I already made the business cards, so what can you do.

[@martinconnelly1473]

You could be the professor of evolutionary biology in a school that is teaching arguments against it without knowing that the arguments you are presenting have all been shot down already. You could sit in the staff room alongside the professor of why atheism is false, why the earth is less than 7000 years old, why the earth is flat and how Noah's ark was the greatest feat of engineering and animal husbandry ever.

[@vonwux]

@@martinconnelly1473 Aye, that's a fair point. Unfortunately they exist too. Well, sans the flat earth bit. For now

[@jordanhester4821]

Well the other side of the coin would be an atheist that's a professor of theology, which I think is pretty normal

[@vonwux]

@@jordanhester4821 Because you can study and understand the field of theology regardless of your own beliefs?

[@jordanhester4821]

@@vonwux So the same is true about a creationist teaching evolution

[@jordanhester4821]

One minute into the discussion and he already made the claim that science doesn't exist, then proceeds to act like it was a gotcha. Incredible :]

[@LanceHall]

Where is the arbitrary point at which past becomes present or vice versa? At what point does he believe past events stop leaving evidence that can be studied in the present?

[@123gamer153]

the person this guest keeps referring to is "Alexey Kondrashov" I had to go to a creationist website to actually get the name. However Alexey doesn't believe in YEC and he doesn't pose any arguments against evolutionary biology. from what i could read Alexey has been taken out of context.

[@zacattack32441]

Yeah, I'm pretty sure the guest is referring to Kondrashov saying that older father's pass on more mutations to their children than younger ones. That's not "generic entropy", thas getting older and accumulating mutations. Its completely different and also irrelevant.

[@Robeebert]

13:00 You cant give them analogies, dude. They are incapable of understanding hypotheticals and analogies.

[@deedrabbit]

Macro evolution doesn't require long spaces of time. Rapid speciation can occur.

[@DeetotheDubs]

25:36 "I'm well-endowed ... with knowledge." More like unbridled Dunnig-Kruger with extra ego.

[@mud-uc2il]

It's IRL lag; deal with it.

[@jasonibbs]

Looked up Kondrashov and the only references to genetic entropy from him are creationist sites and the only quote i see across several sites is talking about degradation of genetics (in humans) from multiple factors and none of them were entropy. I would look up more but as all im finding on it is from creationists, the whole subject is worthless to bother with.

[@Leszek.Rzepecki]

Adaptation is a thing in evolution, though. It's just a biological phenomenon, by which the progeny of any organism are selected by the environment so those best able to survive in that environment pass their genes on, while those less able tend not to.

[@magnuscolable]

Dude says he doesn't believe in evolution but Alexi Kondrashiv says we're devolving? So that's a reason to not believe in evolution?

[@robertcarsten4050]

Which like all people outside the theatre of apologetics these liars cherry pick to try and make a point. Kondrashov does not say we arw devolving

[@R0swell5104]

Brilliant 👍👍👍

[@danielessex2162]

So if he thinks you can not study historical events via science how does he claim there were species of a thing that lived for between 1,000-5,000 years each?

[@michaelmay5453]

BTW, if you are doing research, I can probably provide some for you that is both peer reviewed and well written if I do say so myself.

[@bakerchiropractic1065]

English, according to linguists, is a Western Germanic language..I speak both and there are many cognates

[@SonuSingh-sn8qg]

That was a fun end

[@Deathovseasons]

The comment on horizontal gene transfer only occurring in bacteria is wildly inaccurate, there are plenty of recorded instances of horizontal gene transfer from plant to fungi in lichens, plant to animal or even animal to animal as some examples.

[@mungelomwaangasikateyo376]

Sarcoromyces SHOUT OUT!🎉🎉🎉

[@aja8814]

wtf was the part about the 5000 year lifespan species??????

[@EricBurns1]

The only example you need to bring up for evolution is the London Underground Mosquitos. It didn't exist until the underground tube system was built and they can't breed with mosquitos above ground. Boom, evolution of a new species.

[@thedeebo410]

"BuT tHeY'rE sTiLl MoSqUiToS, hurr durr!"

[@BaronVonQuiply]

30:41 Is too perfect

[@cliffordbohm]

Accurate predictons this is what we shoukd be talking about. If you can only account for past.events but cant make future predictions you have a model, but you need to be able to yest that model to claim you have someyhung like a theor. Howere but since we have been able to make future predictions about what we will find in the historical record. We have been able to make accurate future predictions on historical data!

[@Mr.AndersonCrosses]

Check out a paper from 2024 by Hancock and Cardinale that completely dismantles Genetic Entropy.

[@BaronVonQuiply]

I feel outgunned by this caller... I only have **one** post hole digger.

[@martinconnelly1473]

His are Piled Higher and Deeper on top of his Bull Shit Certificate

[@mojomusica]

I thought Peterson was too easy on him. There were a few more epithets he could have thrown in there, I won't mention them as I would get banned by Y/T, but I think we all know what he deserved to be called. Even more annoyingly, he sounded like he was from the UK, most likely London, I am embarrassed to even live on the same continent, never mind the same country.

[@Rage_Harder_Then_Relax]

Dude, I wouldn't concern yourself over it too much. These types of people are in every country and city around the world. LOL.

[@Taylor-vz4ot]

this man doesn't understand that we have numerous methods for measurement and testing. like my parents, he has the "only if you can observe it" means you can see and touch it. well, we can touch old things, and we can test them in various ways and SEE the data, and we can and do retest to determine the reliability of the data. this is just "i don't want to accept proven science that doesn't mesh with my world view". i know this because i've had this very argument with my own parents on several occasions before finally leaving them after all the abuse i suffered under them.

[@thefub101]

So we can never solve a crime unless the police witness it themselves right ? 😅😅

[@Weirdaman]

I have PHD in Peestorageology and indeed, Peterson consulted me when he wrote his book. Pee is stored in balls.

[@JackoaTrades]

"I've got a 167 PhD's" 🤣😂🤣

[@davids11131113]

He probably got his PhD from Kent Hovind

[@RileyInTheBox]

"All ovservation is in the past," is a bad counterpoint. You're right that his assertion that "historical science" is illegitimate is nonsense. I think a better counterpoint is that the Bible is not a historical document or a scientific account. Even if you take it as such, it presents a hypothesis that is refuted by observational science.

[@OceanusHelios]

The bible being historical breaks down in the first few paragraphs of the bible. "God said let there be light...." and then some things were created, according to the story...earth, ocean, sky, animals, plants....lastly humans. Okay, so if humans were last on this list, how did they observe all the stuff from before? Apparently they weren't there yet. The absurdites of the story are abundant.

[@user-vm3dd4yd2l]

How does he say it’s not in the past does he not know how vision works?

[@heiyuall]

He doesn’t even have a script. He has Cult of Ham flashcards and a hardon for schadenfreude.

[@deviouskris3012]

Riz is funny. He has accidentally debunked flat earth, creationism and his own credibility.

[@abigaildavis9159]

It's hilariously painful to watch 😅. Planet Peterson is internet gold.

[@henrim9348]

How about observable creation? Has anyone observed God create men from dirt and women from men?

[@OceanusHelios]

Not even their hyopthectical Adam observed that when it happened....and their Adam couldn't have observed creation either. By their story he could have observed Eve being made from his bone right before he thought "I am going to bone that."

[@psychoticgod5035]

That whole starting bit about historical science and how it doesn't count made me wonder what place it has in a debate about evolution. You dont want to talk about the past on a subject about the past? I guess that also means you can run behind god because that is also in the past.