I think I am a communitarianist (+everything else) so when ever someone mentions or explains it I leap. Thanks for the content. Subbed. Ps. Another thanks to my 11 grade English teacher who though libertarian(at least I think he was) accidentally helped me realize that I am a communitarianist.
@LBoomsky3 ай бұрын
22:59 Clearly it's not tho lol, i mean life is the ultimate right because it encompasses the ability for all other rights. Bodily autonomy is both an aspect of one's life, being the measurement of a thing one owns, their body. But actions pertaining life itself are higher priority thus can bypass the right to one's own body if it is from which life exists and thus out to not be killed. Pro choice have it out of order. Emotism does not determine the difference, the nature of the rights define the status of the rights in the code of morality.
@glasselevator3 ай бұрын
@@LBoomsky The idea though is that a common pro choice view holds that the fetus isn’t a thing that has a right to life (because it isn’t alive, or some analogous view), while a common pro life view is that the fetus does have a right to life. This is a descriptive claim anyway about what people believe.
@LBoomsky3 ай бұрын
@@glasselevator ok, I guess I was more yapping about emotivism tho lol I think it assumes that emotion drives morality when I think emotion is simply one bias of accuracy rather than the full picture of truth.
@glasselevator3 ай бұрын
@@LBoomsky yeah for sure, I think we probably agree, just clarifying